From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Mon Sep 01 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!classic.msn.com!rcb5
From: rcb5@classic.msn.com ("Ronald Blue")
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Neutrotranmitters frequencies?
Date: 1 Sep 1997 19:17:32 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 5
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <UPMAIL16.199709020215450250@classic.msn.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Do the neurotransmitters have unique radio frequencies which will
cause them to viberate or move quickly.  
Could use these to seperate the chemicals?
What are the frequencies?
Ron Blue

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Tue Sep 02 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!hammer.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed1-hme1!newsfeed.internetmci.com!204.238.120.130!jump.net!jumpnet.com!news
From: Br. Michael<stanthony@jumpnet.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: St. Anthony of Padua
Date: 3 Sep 1997 04:40:53 GMT
Organization: St. Anthony Center
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <5uipol$4er@news.jumpnet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: jump-dialup-0026.jumpnet.com

September 1, 1997

	We need your help NOW! The Order of St. Anthony/St. Anthony Center is an ecumenical tax exempt Religious Order dedicated to helping the oppressed. One group of oppressed is the alcoholics and addicts. A few months ago we entered into an escrow contract with owner financing, to purchase 152 acres just southeast of Austin.  This property would provide a larger home for the monastery and those who want to work with us, as well as property on which to develop the first St. Anthony Detox and Recovery Center. This contract requires a $250,000 down payment. 
	We planned an 84 hour music festival for this weekend called The Cow Pasture Special.We were featuring Blood Sweat & Tears, the Ricky Van Shelton Band, Willie Nelson and many local groups. This would have covered the down payment and more. At the last minute our financial backers for the festival reneged on their commitments. We could not find alternative backing fast enough and had to cancel the festival. Now we are asking for donations or loans of approximately $300,000 to cover the down payment and liabilities we acquired in having to cancel the festival.Closing on the property is this Thursday, 9/4/97.
	If you or people you know have a special interest in the desperate need for detox and recovery facilities, please contact us immediately at (512) 467-0613; FAX (512) 467-9027; 7511 Carriage Drive; Austin, Texas 78752 or e-mail at stanthony@jumpnet.com.
For The St. Anthony Center:
With Love and Peace; I am, Br. Michael, OSA

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Tue Sep 02 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!sloan.org!trance
From: trance@sloan.org
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: POSTDOCS: Comp. Molec. Biol.
Date: 3 Sep 1997 08:17:49 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 213
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <40DA4980.1801@sloan.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

     Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
     and
     U.S. Department of Energy
     
     Postdoctoral Fellowships in Computational Molecular Biology
     (Round III)
     
     APPLICATION DEADLINE: JANUARY 19, 1998
     
     The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the U.S. Department of Energy 
     believe that a nexus with exceptional scientific potential is emerging 
     between the powerful theoretical and practical tools of molecular 
     biology and the revolutionary power of modern computational 
     techniques. However, too few scientists possess the cross-disciplinary 
     skills in both molecular biology and computation that are needed to 
     further such advances. 
     
     The purpose of these fellowships is to catalyze career transitions 
     into computational molecular biology from physics, mathematics, 
     computer science, chemistry, and related fields. Ideal candidates will 
     have strong educational backgrounds in such fields and wish to bring 
     these backgrounds to bear upon computational molecular research 
     questions. In exceptional cases, we will also consider applications 
     from more traditional biological orientations in transition to 
     computational molecular biology. Applicants already firmly rooted in 
     computational molecular biology, or who are proposing to continue 
     pursuit of research undertaken for their Ph.D.s, may be more 
     appropriate candidates for other postdoctoral opportunities. 
     
     This postdoctoral program is designed to give computationally 
     sophisticated young scientists an intensive postdoctoral opportunity 
     in an appropriate molecular biology laboratory. We particularly wish 
     to encourage applications from those holding doctorates in 
     mathematics, physics, computer science, chemistry, or other relevant 
     fields who would like to develop the capacity to apply their 
     computational sophistication to the complex problems that increasingly 
     face molecular biology. 
     
     The focus of this program is upon computational molecular biology 
     related to data and information from studies of human and other 
     genomes. Computational molecular biology is taken broadly to include 
     the application of mathematics (continuous and discrete), statistics, 
     probability, and computer science to fundamental problems of molecular 
     biology. The goal is to foster interactions between the mathematical 
     and biological sciences and to provide rigorous training for 
     scientists in this new interdisciplinary area. Of special interest are 
     important problems in structural biology and genome analysis, 
     including analysis of protein and nucleic acid sequence, protein and 
     nucleic acid structure, genome structure and maps, cross-species 
     genome analysis, multi-genic traits, and structure-function 
     relationships where the structures are from genomes, genes, or gene 
     products. 
     
     Applications will be reviewed by:
     
     
     Philip P. Green, University of Washington
     Barry Honig, Columbia University
     Leroy E. Hood, University of Washington
     Michael Levitt, Stanford University
     Michael S. Waterman, University of Southern California 
     
     Awards will support up to two years of research work in an appropriate 
     molecular biology department or laboratory in the U.S. or Canada 
     selected by the applicant. The principal selection criteria will be 
     the potential of the applicant and the proposed postdoctoral research 
     and training plan for furthering rigorous computational approaches to 
     analysis of important molecular biological problems, both theoretical 
     and empirical. The capabilities of the proposed laboratory and senior 
     scientist in computational molecular research, and support for the 
     postdoctoral research by the senior scientist (department chair or 
     laboratory director) will be an important  element considered in 
     selection. In addition, where possible, applicants are encouraged to 
     seek a secondary faculty sponsor from the mathematical/computer 
     sciences sector of the same campus.  Only one proposal per applicant 
     will be considered, and a senior scientist should endorse only one 
     applicant for this competition. 
     
     There are no formal application forms needed for this program. 
     
     Further details and application procedures are as follows: 
     
     Number, Starting Date and Grant Period: 
     
     Up to 10 fellowships will be granted during 1998, each with a total 
     budget of $100,000 (including indirect and overhead costs, which 
     together will be limited to 15% of direct costs). These funds are to 
     be spread over a grant period of two years ($50,000 per year). 
     Selections for this third round will be announced in May, 1998. 
     Funding may begin any time after September 1, 1998. 
     
     Stipend: 
     
     -$42,000 per year to Fellow, inclusive of benefits.
     -$ 1,500 per year in research expenses to be allocated at the          
     discretion of the Fellow.
     -Institutional overhead of up to 15% of direct costs.
     
     Eligibility: 
     
     Fellow - Applicants must be citizens or legal permanent residents of 
     the United States. Ph.D. earned within the past 5 years or expected by 
     June, 1998, in mathematics, physics, computer science, chemistry or 
     other relevant fields. (Initiation of postdoc requires completion of 
     Ph.D.) Applications to extend an existing postdoc cannot be 
     considered. 
     
     Institution - Non-profit private or public institution of higher 
     education or research, located in the United States or Canada. 
     Applicant must make formal arrangements with a senior scientist (e.g. 
     laboratory director) at the institution where the postdoctoral 
     fellowship would be held before applying for the award. 
     
     Materials Needed for Application:
     
     From Applicant (8 copies, fully collated):
     
     Cover Page, including:
     
     - Applicant's name, address, telephone, fax and e-mail - Applicant's 
     current department and institution 
     - Title of proposed postdoctoral research project and institution at   
     which it would be conducted (including mail and email addresses and  
     telephone and fax numbers) 
     - Planned starting date of postdoctoral fellowship 
     - Applicant's Ph.D. granting institution and year of receipt (or date  
     realistically expected) 
     - Brief educational history indicating the year and institution of     
     graduate study and of any postdoctoral research
     - Laboratory, department and institution in which postdoctoral         
     fellowship would be held 
     - Name, address and telephone of senior scientist 
     - Names, addresses, telephone numbers, etc., of references
     
     Abstract of proposed research (not to exceed 300 words) 
     
     Proposed research/training plan describing scientific importance of 
     subject, with considerable specificity as to analytic methods and data 
     to be employed, and reason for choice of proposed sponsoring scientist 
     and institution (with a firm maximum of 1,500 words, including 
     selected citations). 
     
     If desired, copies of up to two reprints may be attached to each 
     collated copy of proposal. 
     
     Statement of applicant's reasons for interest in computational 
     molecular biology, current career goals, and potential role of 
     postdoctoral fellowship in attaining such goals (ca. 250 words). 
     
     A summary of the major findings of the applicant's dissertation 
     research (250 words). 
     
     Curriculum vitae including educational background, topic of doctoral 
     dissertation, positions held to date, scientific awards and grants 
     received citing source, duration and amount (direct costs),full 
     titles, and references of all publications. 
     
     Formal institutional endorsement of proposal may be included, but is 
     not required unless and until a formal award offer has been made. 
     
     A stamped, self-addressed postcard (if applicant desires) to confirm 
     that application materials have been received (allow at least 3 weeks 
     for processing; no telephone calls, please). 
     
     All applications should be final and complete; no substitutions or 
     additions. 
     
     From Sponsoring Senior Scientist (8 copies, fully collated): 
     
     Letter of agreement to host and supervise the research of postdoctoral 
     applicant, including any necessary institutional clearances, e.g. 
     animal experimentation, human subjects, recombinant DNA, etc.  Letter 
     must include qualitative comments concerning scientific merit of 
     proposed research and training plan. 
     
     Brief description (500 words) of current research, sources of funding, 
     relevance of applicant's proposed research, and personnel with whom 
     applicant would work. 
     
     Curriculum vitae including educational background, current and former 
     positions, scientific awards and grants received citing source, 
     duration and amount (direct costs), full titles and references of 
     publications related to computational molecular biology. 
     
     From References (8 copies): 
     
     The applicant must request reference letters from three scientists 
     (excluding sponsoring scientist) in relevant disciplines who are 
     knowledgeable about applicant's capabilities and previous research, 
     and to whom he/she has sent a copy of the research/training plan 
     proposed for the postdoctoral fellowship. If possible, one of these 
     three should have personal knowledge of the applicant's doctoral 
     research, and all must comment on the applicant's summary of the major 
     findings of his/her recent research. 
     
     Reference letters should include comments on overall ranking of 
     applicant, e.g. top 1% of Ph.D.s, top 10%, etc. It is the applicant's 
     responsibility to assure that reference letters (8 copies) are sent. 
     
     Deadline and Announcements: 
     
     The deadline for receipt of all application materials from applicant, 
     sponsoring scientist, and related reference letters is January 19, 
     1998 (firm). Announcements will be made by May, 1998. 
     
     Send Application To:
     
     Dr. Michael S. Teitelbaum
     Sloan/DOE Joint Postdoctoral Fellowships 
       in Computational Molecular Biology
     Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
     630 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2550
     New York, NY 10111-0242

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Tue Sep 02 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!news.ohsu.edu!not-for-mail
From: Matt Jones <jonesmat@ohsu.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Question about Eyring Rate Theory
Date: 3 Sep 1997 19:08:01 GMT
Organization: Vollum Institute
Lines: 35
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <5ukcih$h76$2@fremont.ohsu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.53.99.48
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Nuntius 2.0.4_68K
X-XXDate: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 20:18:52 GMT


Hi all,

In describing chemical reactions, people often use the Theory of Absolute
Reaction Rates, also known as Eyring Rate Theory. As you know, the idea
is that reactants and products are separated by a "transition state"
which is less favorable (thermodynamically, has a higher energy) than
either products or reactants. Thus, after forming, it quickly
disintegrates leaving either the initial reactants again or the products.
The energy difference between the reactants and the transition state
indicates the rate of the forward reaction, whereas the difference
between the transition state and the reactants indicates the rate of the
backward reaction. 

Usually, the reaction is drawn schematically on X and Y axes, in which
the Y axis represents the energy at each point in the reaction pathway,
and the X axis is usually labelled "Reaction Coordinate". 

My questions are these:

1) What is the physical meaning of "Reaction Coordinate"? Is it related
to the physical distance between reactant molecules? Does it have units,
and if so what are they? 

2) Is there actually an equation that uses the Reaction Coordinate as the
independent variable, with energy as the dependent variable, that one can
use to generate these Eyring diagrams? What is this equation, and where
can I find a published derivation (The Eyring 1935 paper that I read does
not really give such an equation, or if it does, I didn't recognize it). 

Thanks much,

Matt Jones
The Vollum Institute
Portland, OR USA

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Tue Sep 02 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!hammer.uoregon.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!01-newsfeed.univie.ac.at!03-newsfeed.univie.ac.at!news.univie.ac.at!loop.mdy.univie.ac.at!hs
From: hs@mdy.univie.ac.at (Hellfried Schreiber)
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: ICMSB97 - Final Programme
Date: 3 Sep 1997 18:56:21 GMT
Organization: Vienna University, Austria
Lines: 262
Sender: hs@loop.mdy.univie.ac.at (Hellfried Schreiber)
Message-ID: <5ukbsl$1c0q@www.univie.ac.at>
NNTP-Posting-Host: loop.mdy.univie.ac.at


                         -------------------
                           Final Programme
                         -------------------


   S E C O N D  I N T E R N A T I O N A L  C O N F E R E N C E  O N

          M O L E C U L A R  S T R U C T U R A L  B I O L O Y

                        >>  I C M S B  97 <<
                           

                       SEPTEMBER 10 - 14, 1997 

                           VIENNA, AUSTRIA


                           Organized by the 
                       Austrian Chemical Society
                  Working Group Biophysical Chemistry


----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                    Scientific Schedule and Social Programme
                    ========================================


* Wednesday 10.9.97

  From 14:00        		Registration

  19:00     Dr. Max Perutz (Honorary)
            Glutamine Repeats and Inherited Neurodegenerative Diseases

  20:00     Welcome Get-Together     



* Thursday 11.9.97      	STRUCTURE AND PREDICTION
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

  9:00      Announcements

  9:10      H. Michel (Plenary)           
            Structure and Possible Mechanism of Action of the 
            Cytochrome c Oxidase from Paracoccus denitrificans

  9:55      R. Crowther (Plenary)
            The Fold of the Core Protein of Hepatitis B Virus 
            Determined by Electron Cryo-Microscopy

  10:40     Coffee Break

  11:10     T. Richmond (Plenary)               
            X-Ray Structure of the Nucleosome Core Particle at 2.8A
            Resolution

  11:55     R. Dutzler (Short Commun.)          
            Sugar Transport through Maltoporin: 
            From Structure to Mechanism of a Facilitated Diffusion Channel

  12:15     J.-P. Renaud (Short Commun.)        
            Ligand Binding to Retinoid Receptors

  12:35     Lunch

  14:00     G. Rose (Plenary)              
            Simulation of Protein Folding Using LINUS

  14:45     B. Rost (Plenary)              
            Learning from Evolution to Predict Protein Structure

  15:30     L. LoConte (Short Commun.)          
            Visible Volume: A New Way of Exploring Protein Structures

  15:50     Coffee Break

  16:20     S. Benner (Plenary)            
            Natural History and the Physical Sciences: 
            Predicting the Structure of Proteins

  17:05     M. Sippl (Plenary)             
            Molecular Forces in Protein Folding and Prediction

  17:50     M. Rodionov (Short Commun.)         
            Amino Acid Interaction Patterns and Sequence 
            Conservation in Protein Superfamilies

  18:10     Close

  20:00     Cocktail Reception for all participants and accompanying people
            at the City Hall of Vienna "Wiener Rathauskeller"


* Friday 12.9.97                MACROMOLECULAR INTERACTIONS      	
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

  9:00      Announcements

  9:10      W. van Gunsteren (Plenary)          
            Calculation of Free Energy and Binding Constants 
            for Biomolecular Complexes

  9:55      A. Frankel (Plenary)                
            Design and Evolution of RNA-Binding Proteins

  10:40     Coffee Break

  11:10     T. Steitz (Plenary)            
            DNA and RNA Polymerases:
            Structural Diversity and Common Mechanisms

  11:55     P. Walsh (Short Commun.)       
            RNA Binding by the N-Terminus of
            the Wilms, Tumor 1 Tumor Suppressor Protein

  12:15     J. Forbes (Short Commun.)           
            Probing the Hydrophobic Interactions of Surfaces, 
            Peptides, and Macromolecules with the Atomic Force Microscope

  12:35     Lunch

  14:00     Poster Session I

  15:30     Coffee Break

  16:00     R. Rigler (Plenary)            
            Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy, Detection and Selection 
            of Single Molecules

  16:45     A. Watts (Plenary)             
            Atomic Resolution of Bound Ligands in Functionally Active, 
            Membrane Receptors using Non-Crystallographic Methods

  17:30     G. Miller (Short Commun.)           
            Molecular Dynamics Simulations on G Protein-Coupled Receptors: 
            Implementation and Validation of a Membrane Mimetic
  17:50     Close

  This evening has been left free for participants to enjoy Vienna


* Saturday 13.9.97              CATALYSIS AND DESIGN 	
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

  9:00     Announcements

  9:10     O. Jardetzky (Plenary)              
           Protein Dynamics and Conformational Transitions 
           in Allosteric Proteins

  9:55     A. Wlodawer (Plenary)               
           Retroviral Integrases - the Last Frontier in Designing Drugs 
           against AIDS

  10:40     Coffee Break

  11:10     R. Goody (Plenary)             
            Problems and Perspectives in Designing Drugs against AIDS

  11:55     H. Bjrkbacka (Short Commun.)  
            Conformational Changes Induced Upon Oxidation of Chloroplastic
            Carbonic Anhydrase Studied by Intrinsic Tryptophan Fluorescence

  12:15     K. Sakakibara (Short Commun.)  
            Molecular Design of the Amide Transition-state Analog 
            by Molecular Mechanics

  12:35     Lunch

  14:00     Poster Session II

  15:30     Coffee Break

  16:00     M. Weir (Plenary)              
            Role of Structural Biology in Drug Discovery

  16:45     K. Mueller (Plenary)            
            Combined Rational and Random Design Concepts in Drug Discovery

  17:30     J. Priestle (Plenary)               
            A Target Based Strategy for Drug Discovery

  18:15     Close

  On this evening, participants are encouraged to attend the dinner at a
  wine cellar in the city centre. The "Heurigen" atmosphere, with wine
  and Viennese food is very characteristic of Vienna 

* Sunday 14.9.97                FOLDING
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

  9:00      Announcements

  9:10      R. Baldwin (Plenary)                
            Nature of the Apomyoglobin Folding Pathway

  9:55      K. Dill (Plenary)                   
            Sightseeing along the Landscapes of Protein Folding

  10:40     Coffee Break

  11:10     C. Dobson (Plenary)            
            Exploring the Structural Basis of Protein Folding

  11:55     A. N=94ppert (Short Commun.)          
            Initial Hydrophobic Collapse is not Necessary for Protein Folding: 
            A Study by Stopped-Flow Dynamic Light Scattering and Stopped-Flow 
            Circular Dichroism

  12:15     I. Bahar (Short Commun.)       
            Simulation of Protein Folds Using a Low Resolution Model

  12:35     Lunch

  14:00     P. Schuster (Plenary)               
            RNA Structures Beyond the One Sequence-One Structure Paradigm

  14:45     F. Hartl (Plenary)             
            Chaperone-Assisted Protein Folding

  15:30     End of Conference

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

For further information contact:

      Dr. Andreas Kungl 
      Gesellschaft Oesterreichischer Chemiker
      AG Biophysikalische Chemie
      Nibelungengasse 11
      A-1010 Wien, Austria
      Tel.: ++ 43 1 5874249 or ++ 43 1 5873980
      FAX.: ++ 43 1 5878966
      e-mail: biophys@goech.co.at

============================================================================


Distribution: 
Followup-To: 
Organization: Univ. of Vienna, Inst. for Theoretical Chemistry
Keywords: 


-- 


+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                                             |
|                           Hellfried Schreiber, Ph.D.                        |
|                                                                             |
+---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
|                                       |                                     |
|  Institute for Theoretical Chemistry  |                                     |
|  Theoretical Biochemistry Group       |   Mail:  hs@mdy.univie.ac.at        |
|  Waehrigerstrasse 17                  |   Voice: +43 1 40480 - 618          |
|  A-1090 Wien, Austria, Europe         |   FAX:   +43 1 4028525              |
|                                       |                                     |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Tue Sep 02 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!rutgers!nntp.upenn.edu!news.misty.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!globalcenter1!news.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!feta.direct.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.he.net!news.pagesat.net!news.itis.com!not-for-mail
From: Petr Kuzmic <pkuzmic@biokin.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Re: Question about Eyring Rate Theory
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 18:20:08 -0500
Organization: BioKin Consulting
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <340DF0A8.83B27D08@biokin.com>
References: <5ukcih$h76$2@fremont.ohsu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wa3.itis.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)

Matt Jones wrote:

> 1) What is the physical meaning of "Reaction Coordinate"? Is it related
> to the physical distance between reactant molecules? Does it have
> units, and if so what are they?

There are probably better qualified people reading this group (I think
Bob Alberty does) who could answer your question, but here is my $0.02
worth.  

For a two-atom reaction such as H. + H. ----> H2, the reaction
coordinate simply is the distance of the two atoms, or geometrically a
straight line.  When more than two atoms are involved, things get a
little hairy, because now we are in multi-dimensional space: no one
single interatomic distance will suffice.  Still, you can think of the
reaction coordinate in geometric terms if you accept the notion of
multidimensional spaces.  It is a winding "curve" running on the
"surface" of potential energy.  

BTW, did you try to type "reaction coordinate" into the Infoseek search
engine?  Here is what came out on

	http://www.chem.ucalgary.ca/groups/ziegler/IRC.html

	I cut and pasted from the above Web site (Tom Ziegler's group at
Calgary):

	The starting point of studying chemical reactions in computational
chemistry is to locate and characterize the reactants, products, and
transition states on the potential energy surface (PES). For some
reactions the PES can be rather complicated so that it is not obvious to
determine if the transition state (TS) connects to desired reactant(s)
and product(s). In such cases tracing reaction path from the TS to
reactant(s) and product(s) becomes essential for understanding the
reactions. Besides, the information of the PES along the reaction path
is also desired for detailed kinetic and dynamic studies. A nature
definition of reaction path is the steepest descent path from the TS
down to both reactant and product sides on the PES. When mass-weighted
Cartesian coordinates are used, this path is so-called intrinsic
reaction coordinate (IRC). Physically, IRC is the solution of equation
of motion of the nuclei which move on the PES with infinitesimal
velocity. Mathematically, IRC proves to be a quasi-geodesic curve in the
Riemannian space corresponding to the PES and hence the shortest path
connecting the reactant to product via the TS. The IRC is thus a simple
yet rigorous approach for probing complicated reaction processes. 

So there you have it, it is a curve in Riemanian space.  

Doesn't it tell us chemists that math is worth looking at?

------------------------+------------------------
Petr Kuzmic, Ph.D.      |          (608) 256-4790
BioKin Consulting       |      fax (708) 256-1269
P.O. Box 8336           |      pkuzmic@biokin.com
Madison WI 53708        |   http://www.biokin.com
------------------------+------------------------

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Tue Sep 02 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov!cpk-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.bc.net!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.ucalgary.ca!mars.online.uleth.ca!news
From: Marc Roussel <roussel@henri.chem.uleth.ca>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Re: Question about Eyring Rate Theory
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 16:24:33 -0600
Organization: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Lethbridge
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <340DE3A1.167E@henri.chem.uleth.ca>
References: <5ukcih$h76$2@fremont.ohsu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: henri.chem.uleth.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; OSF1 V3.2 alpha)
To: Matt Jones <jonesmat@ohsu.edu>

Matt Jones wrote:
> In describing chemical reactions, people often use the Theory of
> Absolute Reaction Rates, also known as Eyring Rate Theory.

It's generally called Transition State Theory (TST) now.

> My questions are these:
> 
> 1) What is the physical meaning of "Reaction Coordinate"? Is it
> related to the physical distance between reactant molecules? Does it
> have units, and if so what are they?

The reaction coordinate can be any coordinate which varies monotonically
during the reaction.  For instance, during an AB + C -> A + BC reaction,
you might take the reaction coordinate to be either the distance from
atom A to atom B or the distance from B to C.  The former increases
during the reaction while the latter decreases.  For the purposes of
calculating rate constants using TST however, some choices are better
than others.  Some of the most beautiful work on this problem has been
done by Marcus:

@article{Marcus64a,
        Author="R.A. Marcus",
        Journal="J. Chem. Phys.",       volume=41,      number=9,
        pages="2614-2623",      year=1964,
        Title="Generalization of the activated complex theory of
                reaction rates.  I. Quantum mechanical treatment",
        Annote="A version of transition  state theory  not requiring a
                Cartesian  metric is derived."
}

@article{Marcus64b,
        Author="R.A. Marcus",
        Journal="J. Chem. Phys.",       volume=41,      number=9,
        pages="2624-2633",      year=1964,
        Title="Generalization of the activated complex theory of
                reaction rates.  II.  Classical mechanical treatment",
        Annote="It is shown that,  in the right  metric (constructed
                from  geodesics of the potential energy surface),
                there is always  a separable coordinate  in the
                classical  transition state  theory  that  may  be
                used   as  a  reaction coordinate."
}

These papers are classics and well worth reading by anyone with an
interest in TST.  It takes a little background in non-Euclidean geometry
to understand them fully though.

> 2) Is there actually an equation that uses the Reaction Coordinate as
> the independent variable, with energy as the dependent variable, that
> one can use to generate these Eyring diagrams?

     The whole point of TST is that you don't need to know much about
the reaction coordinate or about how the energy varies along it.  You
need only identify the transition state and know a few things about the
geometry of the energy surface there (esp. the curvature along the
reaction coordinate which gives you the "frequency" which enters into
TST calculations; at the TS, the reaction coordinate is the direction of
steepest descent from the saddle point so there is no problem
identifying it there).  This information is (at least in principle)
available from high-precision ab initio calculations.
     The "Eyring diagrams" you refer to are just pedagogical aids.  When
needed to make a point in a paper, I think most people just sketch them.

				Marc R. Roussel
				(roussel@uleth.ca)
				Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
				University of Lethbridge

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Wed Sep 03 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!news.ohsu.edu!not-for-mail
From: Matt Jones <jonesmat@ohsu.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Re: Question about Eyring Rate Theory
Date: 4 Sep 1997 19:55:38 GMT
Organization: Vollum Institute
Lines: 94
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <5un3nq$r93$1@fremont.ohsu.edu>
References: <5ukcih$h76$2@fremont.ohsu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.53.99.48
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Nuntius 2.0.4_68K
X-XXDate: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 21:06:27 GMT

In article <340DF0A8.83B27D08@biokin.com> Petr Kuzmic, pkuzmic@biokin.com
writes:

>So there you have it, it is a curve in Riemanian space.  
>
>Doesn't it tell us chemists that math is worth looking at?
>

Thanks for both of the very helpful responses I've gotten so far. After
looking up some these references, I have this to say:

Ouch! I definitely should have paid more attention in BOTH chemistry and
math class!

I also have a few more questions:

This is from the Ziegler web page:
"A nature definition of reaction path is the steepest descent path from
the TS
down to both reactant and product sides on the PES."

So, tell me if I have this right. One way to think of the reaction
coordinate is to first figure out the "energy surface" for a reaction.
Let's say we're dealing with the reaction A+BC-->ABC, where A, B and C
are single atoms. We could calculate the energy change with distance for
A and B, and for A and C seperately (B and C remain at a fixed distance
from each other, so their relative energy in isolation doesn't change).
Then we could plot this as energy versus the coordinate plane defined by
the A-B distance as one axis and the A-C distance as the other axis.
We'll probably get a sheet with a lump sticking up out of it, right? The
tip of this lump is the transition state. I guess this would really be a
saddle point if there were a lot of lumps, which there must be because
there are very high energies associated with some distances that could
possibly exist. Now, the reaction coordinate is the curve we would trace
if we followed the steepest descent down from the saddle to the products
on one side and the reactants on the other. That's the shortest distance
between reactants and products that goes through the transition state. I
guess we could calculate the length of this curve, keeping our units
straight. So the energy coordinate is _related_ to the spatial distance,
but it's not really a spatial distance because it's going to have units
of energy per angstrom per angstrom or something like that (for this
example). If we had a system with several atoms on different molecules,
then instead of a sheet, we'd have a solid or a hypersurface of some
sort, but still the reaction coordinate would represent the shortest
distance _along_ this energy vs space surface that contained the
transition state.

Is this a reasonable layman's summary  of the main idea, or am I still
getting something grossly wrong? At the moment, for me, understanding
Hamiltonian operators and tensor products and Riemann spaces is right out
of the question. Maybe next week ;-).

One more thing. In the Marcus paper (J. Chem. Phys. 41:2624-2633), he
says: 
"For the reaction to occur some n-1 dimensional hypersurface in the
n-dimensional configurational space must be crossed. (The hypothetical
system constrained to exist on this surface is the 'activated complex.'
The surface is called the 'reaction hypersurface'.)"

In light of what I wrote above, I'm confused about which surface is which
here. I would first imagine that the 'reaction hypersurface' he's
referring to is what I had in mind when I talked about the "reaction
coordinate" above. "Surface" would apply in the case where there's lots
of atoms in the system. Instead of a line or curve (n-1 dimensional when
dealing with 2D space, A-B and A-C axes), you have a sheet for 3D, a
solid for 4D etc. The activated complex lies on this surface (because of
the way you define the surface, i.e. the shortest distance that contains
the transition state). OK. But at the beginning he talks about the system
_"crossing"_ the hypersurface. In my example above, this would be
analogous to crossing (intersecting?) the reaction coordinate, which I
don't think makes any sense. The reaction moves along it, but doesn't
cross it. Or does he mean to cross in the sense of "to traverse" or "to
travel along"?

Can anyone help clear up my confusion on this point (and any others that
I may be confused about)?

Oh, yeah. One final, final question (for now). Those "Eyring Diagrams"
that people draw in 2D: are they analogous to making a cross-sectional
slice through the energy surface that contains the entire curve of
steepest ascent and descent containing the transition state (in my
example above, the energy surface is a lumpy plane, and the cross section
along the reaction coordinate would be a lumpy line, which is what people
usually draw)?  If so, then when they label the X-axis "reaction
coordinate" they're not really talking about what I was talking about
above (units: energy per angstrom per angstrom) but rather just the
straight line where that cross section intersects the A-B x A-C plane
(units: angstrom per angstrom). I realize that people don't intend those
things to be taken too literally, but still I'd like to understand what's
going on.  

If you made it this far, thanks a lot for your patience! 

Matt

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Wed Sep 03 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov!cpk-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!EU.net!news0.Belgium.EU.net!Belgium.EU.net!chaos.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be!usenet
From: Guy Droogmans <guy.droogmans@med.kuleuven.a.c.be>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics,bionet.neuroscience,bionet.software
Subject: WinASCD: analysis of single channel and whole cell currents
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 1997 09:46:50 +0200
Organization: kuleuven.ac.be
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <340E676A.3433D85D@med.kuleuven.a.c.be>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fysiologie-12.med.kuleuven.ac.be
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Xref: biosci bionet.biophysics:3494 bionet.neuroscience:20217 bionet.software:19430

WinASCD is a program to analyze single channel and whole-cell pClamp
data
(Clampex, Fetchex, AxoTape).
It is a 32-bit (WIn95/NT) updated version of an original DOS program
that I
started writing more than 10 years ago.
It includes the following main features:
1. a data correction module for
        baseline restoration (drift correction)
        background subtraction (correction for leak and capacitative
current)
2. a module for calculating average and peak currents
        ensemble averaged current
        avg current for continuous data
        avg and peak current for triggered data
3. a module to construct linear combinations of records belonging to the

   same or different files
4. a module to fit sum of exponentials or a kinetic model to indivudual
    current traces, ensemble averaged currents and composed records
5. a module for the Analysis of Single Channel Data, including
    Amplitude histogram construction and fit with Gauss peaks
    Kinetic Analysis: idealization, dwell time histograms, first
latencies,
                                burst analysis,  analysis of the number
of events
6. a module for the analysis of current fluctuations, including current
    variance analysis  and FFT.

Each window (graphical or text) can be printed (not a screen dump) or
saved
as a TAB delimited ASCII file for import in e.g. a presentation software

package.
A demo version of the program in which output is disabled is available
from
        ftp://cc5.kuleuven.ac.be/pub/droogmans/winascd.zip
--
Guy Droogmans
Laboratorium voor Fysiologie
Campus Gasthuisberg, KU Leuven
B-3000 Leuven (Belgium)
Tel 32 16 345 726
Fax 32 16 345 991



From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Thu Sep 04 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!feta.direct.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.he.net!news.pagesat.net!news.itis.com!not-for-mail
From: Petr Kuzmic <pkuzmic@biokin.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Software available: Biochemical kinetics and equilibria
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 11:25:51 -0500
Organization: BioKin Consulting
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <3410328F.B04B504C@biokin.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: j29.itis.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)


_____________________________________________________
              PUBLIC DOMAIN PROGRAM DYNAFIT AVAILABLE

DynaFit is a program for simulation and least-squares
fitting of biochemical kinetic data.  The user enters
the reaction mechanism symbolically, such as this:

; "Slow, tight" inhibition of HIV proteinase
                                            
[mechanism]                                 
   E + S <==> ES     :     k       ks       
   ES ---> E + P     :     kr               
   E + I <==> EI     :     k1      k2       
   EI <==> EJ        :     k3      k4       

The machine then derives the underlying system of 
differential equations (to compute the time-course of
the reaction) or algebraic equations (to compute the 
composision at equilibrium). 

_____________________________________________________
                                        TEST PROBLEMS

The program should be downloaded along with a set of
test examples, all of them based on real experimental
mostly from biochemical kinetics, but the same methods
can be used for other areas of chemistry and biology.

_____________________________________________________
                                              REVIEWS

A reviewer had this to say about DynaFit: "If you do any 
kind of kinetic data analysis as part of your research 
program, be sure to download DynaFit from the BioKin Web 
site."  (HMS Beagle Newsletter "Software Alert", volume
1997 No. 9).

_____________________________________________________
                                                LINKS

http://www.biokin.com/                    BioKin home
http://www.biokin.com/dynafit/index.shtml ... DynaFit

_____________________________________________________
                                           REFERENCES

P. Kuzmic (1996) Anal. Biochem. 237, 260-273.

_____________________________________________________________
Petr Kuzmic Ph.D. * BioKin Ltd. * Madison, WI 53708-8336, USA
pkuzmic@biokin.com * http://www.biokin.com * 608.256.1269 fax

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Thu Sep 04 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!TTUHSC.EDU!phyan
From: phyan@TTUHSC.EDU (Alan Neely)
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Neutrotranmitters frequencies?
Date: 5 Sep 1997 06:38:56 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 10
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970905084542.006c00b4@ttuhsc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

What are you talking about ? I am sure that neurotransmitter like any other
molecule has an NMR spectra related to the rotation of nuclei. Vibration in
on the infrared range and I am afraid that movement is pretty random.
Cromatography and electroforesis are more likely to help you in this. 


Waht is your background ? What are you really up to ?

Alan


From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Thu Sep 04 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!feta.direct.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.he.net!news.pagesat.net!news.itis.com!not-for-mail
From: Petr Kuzmic <pkuzmic@biokin.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Re: Question about Eyring Rate Theory
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 00:13:23 -0500
Organization: BioKin Consulting
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <340F94F3.34B8779A@biokin.com>
References: <5ukcih$h76$2@fremont.ohsu.edu> <5un3nq$r93$1@fremont.ohsu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: q41.itis.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)


Matt Jones wrote:

> Then we could plot this as energy versus the coordinate plane defined
> by the A-B distance as one axis and the A-C distance as the other axis.
> We'll probably get a sheet with a lump sticking up out of it, right?
> The tip of this lump is the transition state. 

Not really: your second idea is better:

> I guess this would really be
> a saddle point

> Is this a reasonable layman's summary  of the main idea, or am I still
> getting something grossly wrong? 

I think you are on the right track. Especially the part about saddle
points.  A friend of mine did his Ph.D. and then a post-doc with Roald
Hoffmann finding methods to get from an energy minimum (say, a minimum
according to the molecular orbital theory) UP TO THE SADDLE POINT, where
the transition state actually "is".  (You see, the energy minimum is
relatively easy to find, compared to finding the structure of the saddle
point, because there you have to climb up the hill but only in a certain
very intelligent way.)



> Oh, yeah. One final, final question (for now). Those "Eyring Diagrams"
> (snip)
> they're not really talking about what I was talking about
> above (units: energy per angstrom per angstrom)

Be careful: the "Intrinsic Reaction Coordinate" of Ziegler is a more
exotic beast then drawings of "r.c." in undergaduate texts. Really what
most people mean is just an interatomic distance between two atoms
making and breaking a bond, while all the other atoms (if any) in the
system follow along their respective least "expensive" pathway.  

Why don't you mail Dr. Ziegler himself and ask him about the Web page
his group posted? Maybe he can unleash someone on you to explain the
details, or send you some reprints and other info on R.C.




------------------------+------------------------
Petr Kuzmic, Ph.D.      |          (608) 256-4790
BioKin Consulting       |      fax (708) 256-1269
P.O. Box 8336           |      pkuzmic@biokin.com
Madison WI 53708        |   http://www.biokin.com
------------------------+------------------------

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Thu Sep 04 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!howland.erols.net!newsfeed1-hme1!newsfeed.internetmci.com!205.219.188.10!news.lr.net!usenet
From: lin <lin@worldpath.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Laser WANTED
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 17:36:16 -0400
Organization: LRNet, Inc.
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <34107B50.ECF79FE8@worldpath.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ndur2-3.worldpath.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en] (Win95; I)


Wanted old PHASE-R Pulse dye lasers.
Re mail if you got one !!!





From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Fri Sep 05 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu!vncnews!HSNX.wco.com!feta.direct.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!howland.erols.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news-in-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!199.45.32.37!world1.bellatlantic.net!news
From: CASH4U@dream.com
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: GET THE CASH YOU NEED ////////////
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 16:43:58
Organization: Bell Atlantic Internet Solutions
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <5usfd8$d3n@world1.bawave.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: client-110-27.bellatlantic.net


CASH GRANTS   CASH GRANTS   CASH GRANTS

Foundations all over the United States GIVE CASH GRANTS.

ANYONE can apply for a Grant from 18 years and up...

This money HAS to be given away, WHY not to YOU?

Grants from $500.00 to $50,000.00 possible, in some instances.

Grants don't have to be paid back.

Grants can be ideal for people who are or were bankrupt 
or just have bad credit.

Get the money you need to start that business, you have always wanted.

To get your  list of  FOUNDATIONS that give grants, AND instructions 
on how to apply.

Send a check or money order for ONLY $7.00 to:

TO RECEIVE BY US MAIL ENCLOSE A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED, #10 ENVELOPE.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
B.C.S.
39 GURLEY ROAD  #201
EDISON, NJ  08817
Att: GRANT INFO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Include your E-MAIL ADDRESS for faster service.





From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Sun Sep 07 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!thetimes.pixel.kodak.com!news.kodak.com!news-pen-16.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.nysernet.net!news.nysernet.net!206.229.87.50!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news-in-east.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.bc.net!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.ucalgary.ca!mars.online.uleth.ca!news
From: Marc Roussel <roussel@henri.chem.uleth.ca>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Re: Question about Eyring Rate Theory
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 15:46:10 -0600
Organization: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Lethbridge
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <34147222.167E@henri.chem.uleth.ca>
References: <5ukcih$h76$2@fremont.ohsu.edu> <5un3nq$r93$1@fremont.ohsu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: henri.chem.uleth.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; OSF1 V3.2 alpha)
To: Matt Jones <jonesmat@ohsu.edu>

Matt Jones wrote:
> If we had a system with several atoms on different molecules,
> then instead of a sheet, we'd have a solid or a hypersurface of some
> sort, but still the reaction coordinate would represent the shortest
> distance _along_ this energy vs space surface that contained the
> transition state.

Not exactly.  The reaction path would be the lowest energy path
connecting the saddle point to the reactant and product minima.  This is
almost certainly not the shortest distance.

> One more thing. In the Marcus paper (J. Chem. Phys. 41:2624-2633), he
> says:
> "For the reaction to occur some n-1 dimensional hypersurface in the
> n-dimensional configurational space must be crossed. (The hypothetical
> system constrained to exist on this surface is the 'activated
> complex.' The surface is called the 'reaction hypersurface'.)"

Let's take the simplest case.  If you think about the traditional
diagrams, the energy is shown as a one-dimensional curve.  The product
and reactant are separated by a maximum (a point, which is a
zero-dimensional object).  Now think about an energy surface.  The
surface is two-dimensional and the reactants and products are separated
by a line (one-dimensional) running through the saddle point and
perpendicular to the direction of steepest descent.  The generalization
to higher dimensions is obvious :-).

				Marc R. Roussel
				(roussel@uleth.ca)
				Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
				University of Lethbridge

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Mon Sep 08 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!europa.clark.net!4.1.16.34!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!newsfeed.ecrc.net!news1.chicago.cic.net!iagnet.net!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!news.itis.com!not-for-mail
From: Petr Kuzmic <pkuzmic@biokin.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Henri (1902) translation
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 22:47:11 -0500
Organization: BioKin Consulting
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <3414C6BF.9A360377@biokin.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wa48.itis.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)

Greetings,

I have posted on the BioKin website (http://www.biokin.com) an English
translation of

	Victor Henri (1902) 
	"General Theory of Action of Certain Hydrolases"
	Compt. rend. hebd. Acad. Sci. Paris 135, 916-919 (1902).

I think it is particularly amusing from today's perspective that Mr.
Henri imagined the enzyme exerting its catalytic influence without a
direct physical contact with the substrate (see problem 2.2 p. 37 of
Athel Cornish-Bowden "Fundamentals..." 1979 edition). 

If anyone (especially native French speakers) would care to comment on
the translation, it would be much appreciated (I depended on my
dictionary to do this).  

	Petr


_____________________________________________________________
Petr Kuzmic Ph.D. * BioKin Ltd. * Madison, WI 53708-8336, USA
pkuzmic@biokin.com * http://www.biokin.com * 608.256.1269 fax

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Tue Sep 09 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!feed1.news.erols.com!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news-in-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!131.103.1.114!news1.chicago.cic.net!iagnet.net!nntp.earthlink.net!usenet
From: specpress@earthlink.net (Claire Haller)
Newsgroups: bionet.neuroscience,bionet.biophysics,bionet.cellbiol
Subject: SCIENCE-WEEK: This Week's Headlines (5 Sep 97)
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 01:13:26 GMT
Organization: SCIENCE-WEEK
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <5v4sb3$17i@argentina.earthlink.net>
Reply-To: prismx@earthlink.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.35.118.102
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: biosci bionet.neuroscience:20258 bionet.biophysics:3506 bionet.cellbiol:8037

Headlines in This Week's SCIENCE-WEEK (September 5, 1997)
[complete digests free at http://members.aol.com/sciweek]

Karolinska Institute Accuses One of Its Researchers of Fraud
University of California Loses Important Insulin Patent Law Suit
An International Group to Search for Supernova Neutrinos
Mesospheric Water Data Supports Small-Comet Theory
Report of First Quantum Mechanical Entanglement of Atoms
RNA Polymerization a Focus at Origin of Life Meeting
New Investigations of RNA Structure and Catalysis
First Emission of Low-Energy UV Photons from an Atomic Nucleus
Mechanism of Macrophage Invasion by Tuberculosis Pathogen
Receptor-Mediated Retrograde Chemical Signaling in Neurons
A New Technique for Localizing Intracellular Calcium Ions
Evidence for Retrovirus Involvement in Autoimmune Diabetes

The Editors
SCIENCE-WEEK
A Free Weekly Digest of the News of Science
prismx@earthlink.net
http://members.aol.com/sciweek


From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Tue Sep 09 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!europa.clark.net!194.162.162.196!newsfeed.nacamar.de!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!news.misty.com!nntp.upenn.edu!axe1.med.upenn.edu!axelsen
From: axelsen@axe1.med.upenn.edu (Paul H Axelsen)
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: POSTDOCTORAL POSITIONS: Molecular Recognition and Membrane Biophysics
Date: 10 Sep 1997 15:38:16 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <5v6et8$h1g$2@netnews.upenn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: axe1.med.upenn.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2-upenn1.1]

POSTDOCTORAL POSITIONS AVAILABLE: Molecular Recognition and Membrane Biophysics

Projects involve the use of novel spectroscopic techniques (infrared and UV)
and mass spectrometry to study the behavior of antibiotics, fusogenic peptides,
and blood coagulation proteins on lipid membranes with a view towards rational
drug design.  The laboratory is stably funded and the positions are available 
immediately.  Applicants MUST be available for interview prior to appointment.
Persons with a talent for mastering sophisticated new technology, and seeking 
to work on important biomedical problems, should inquire by email to 

                      axe@pharm.med.upenn.edu
or

Prof. Paul H. Axelsen 
Departments of Pharmacology and 
  Medicine, Infectious Diseases Section 
University of Pennsylvania             
Rooms 130/131 John Morgan Bldg        
3620 Hamilton Walk               
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6084    

215-898-9238 / 9766 (tel)    
215-573-2236 (fax)
http://axe2.med.upenn.edu (www)


--

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              
Axe@pharm

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Wed Sep 10 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!howland.erols.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!bullseye.news.demon.net!demon!newsgate.unisource.nl!surfnet.nl!ruu.nl!gillies
From: Malcolm Gillies <malcolm@vei.co.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics,bionet.molec-model,sci.bio.technology,sci.chem
Subject: [2nd Announce] Molecular Graphics & Modelling Electronic Conference 2
Followup-To: poster
Date: 11 Sep 1997 14:46:01 GMT
Organization: Virtual Environments International, Oxford UK
Message-ID: <5v9079$qr0$1@newshost.cc.ruu.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cmcind.far.ruu.nl
Originator: gillies@cmcind.far.ruu.nl
Lines: 96
Xref: biosci bionet.biophysics:3509 bionet.molec-model:1787


[please note that the deadline for submissions has been
 extended until September 15 for abstracts and September 22
 for papers and posters]

Second Electronic Molecular Graphics and Modelling Conference
*************************************************************
October 6-17, 1997

    World Wide Web:    http://www.vei.co.uk/mgmec2/
    Email:             mgmnorg@vei.co.uk

The Second Electronic Molecular Graphics and Modelling Conference
(MGM EC-2) will be held on the Internet and World Wide Web
from Oct 6-17, 1997 and will cover a broad range of disciplines
related to molecular modelling, graphics and simulation methods
and applications.

Conference subject areas are: Protein Structure; Membranes and
Membrane Proteins; Protein Folding; Modelling of In Vivo Activity;
Knowledge-based Library Design; Surface Science; Host-guest
interactions; Carbohydrates and Protein-Carbohydrate Interactions;
Enzyme Mechanisms; Conformational Sampling; Nucleic Acids; Quantum
Chemistry; Structure-based Design; Visualization; and Perspectives.

Presentations of papers or posters must be prepared in Hypertext Markup
Language (HTML) with figures in GIF or other Web-compatible formats so
that participants can view the papers via the World Wide Web (The
presentations may also include enhancements such as 3D structures,
VRML, Java, RealAudio, Quicktime movies etc.)

Authors may submit WWW presentations for non-permanent display during
the conference, or for refereed print or electronic publication in the
Journal of Molecular Graphics or the Internet Journal of Chemistry (IJC),
http://www.ijc.com/

During the conference, interaction, presentations and discussions will
take place via the Internet using a Java-based virtual conference
centre, WWW-based discussion forums and an electronic mailing list.
Before the conference, a timetable for lectures and discussion sessions
for each section will be posted.

The Conference will feature a Virtual Exhibition where exhibitors will
be able to describe the activities of their organization, display their
products and services and interact with registrants. Potential
exhibitors should contact the conference organisers.

Further information regarding the conference is available from the
conference WWW site at http://www.vei.co.uk/mgmec2/

Inquiries may also be sent by email to the conference organisers at
mgmnorg@vei.co.uk

REGISTRATION
************

If you intend to participate in MGM EC-2 please use the special
registration form accessible via http://www.vei.co.uk/mgmec2/.

In addition it is necessary to pay for registration via ordinary
means:  The conference fee will be 45 pounds sterling (75 US dollars)
with a special rate for students of 30 pounds sterling (50 US dollars).

DEADLINES AND DATES               
*******************

1) DEADLINE for receipt of ABSTRACT.

   The deadline for receipt of presentation abstracts is September 15.

2) DEADLINE for receipt of PRESENTATION

   The deadline for receipt of papers and posters is September 22.

3) Refereeing Period

   The refereeing period will commence upon completion of the conference.

Molecular Graphics & Modelling Network (MGMN) mailing list
**********************************************************

Conference-related news and announcements will be posted regularly to
the MGMN mailing list (mgmn@vei.co.uk).

If you wish to subscribe to the MGMN list send the following one line
message to mgmn-request@vei.co.uk

subscribe your_email@address

To unsubscribe send the following message:

unsubscribe your_email@address
--
Posted by Malcolm Gillies <malcolm@vei.co.uk>
Molecular Modelling Coordinator
Virtual Environments International, Oxford UK
http://www.vei.co.uk/

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Thu Sep 11 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!howland.erols.net!iagnet.net!nntp.earthlink.net!usenet
From: specpress@earthlink.net (Claire Haller)
Newsgroups: bionet.neuroscience,bionet.biophysics,bionet.cellbiol
Subject: SCIENCE-WEEK: This Week's Headlines (12 Sep 97)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 03:31:26 GMT
Organization: SCIENCE-WEEK
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <5vad5l$qsa@chile.earthlink.net>
Reply-To: prismx@earthlink.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.36.135.18
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: biosci bionet.neuroscience:20275 bionet.biophysics:3510 bionet.cellbiol:8048


Headlines in This Week's SCIENCE-WEEK (September 12, 1997)
[complete digests free at http://members.aol.com/sciweek]

First Annual Decline in Number of U.S. Graduate Science Students
Anthropological Evidence for Earliest Known Net Hunters
No Evidence of Nearby Galactic or Intergalactic Hydrogen Reserves
First Production of Matter From Light
First Evidence of an Exotic Meson
Evidence for Decline of Sea-Ice Surrounding Antarctica
First Commercial Catalytic Antibody for Chemical Synthesis
Animal Virus Engineered to Attack HIV Virus
A Possible Novel Mechanism of Gene Mutation in Cancer
More Evidence for Cofactors in Prion Pathogenesis
Prenatal Lead Exposure and Postnatal Lead Toxicity
First Mice Engineered for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
New Multi-Drug Resistance of Plague Pathogen

The Editors
SCIENCE-WEEK
A Free Weekly Digest of the News of Science
prismx@earthlink.net
http://members.aol.com/sciweek


From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Fri Sep 12 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!newsfeed.dacom.co.kr!europa.clark.net!205.252.116.205!howland.erols.net!ix.netcom.com!news
From: Alex Damien <AlexDn@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: International Symposium
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 09:00:53 -0700
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <341AB8B5.1F52@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: AlexDn@ix.netcom.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: wfd-nj1-21.ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Sep 13  9:29:14 AM CDT 1997
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-NC320  (Win16; I)


The following page contains the program schedule for the 1st
INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM on Enigmatic and Uncertain Substances and
Microorganisms in Bucaramanga, Colombia, South America.

AIDS WITHOUT HIV: Myth or Reality?

http://www.netcom.com/~alexdn/sympos.html

Please spread this message to all Internet sites (www, newsgroups,
mailing lists, etc.) that would be of interest.  Thank you.

George DeCarlo



From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Fri Sep 12 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!xfer.kren.nm.kr!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!prodigy.com!nntp.earthlink.net!raw
From: raw@healthcareforums.com (Ruth Ann)
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: * Biomedical COMMUNICATIONS Freeware *
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 02:57:08 -0800
Organization: Worldwide Healthcare Forums
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <raw-1309970257080001@news.earthlink.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.28.33.14
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.2.0b13

*NEW*  Please excuse any cross-posting.

Instant Online Communication with your Family + 
BioNET Colleagues & Friends. 

Free: PeopleLink is a new communications service that lets people stay in
touch no
matter where they are on the Internet. The PeopleLink application notifies users
whenever selected friends, colleagues or family members appear online, and
enables
them to instantly communicate in real-time. Combining the interactivity of
chat with 
the selectivity and privacy of email. PeopleLink provides the simplest,
safest, and most
dependable way for online Healthcare Professionals to connect and communicate. 
 
PeopleLink is free to users, takes less than 5 minutes to download at
28.8, sets up easily, 
and is available for Windows 95, Windows 3.x, Macintosh PowerPC and 68K
platforms.
Download at
http://www.healthcareforums.com/plink.html

----------------------------------
Visit 200 Healthcare Forums in English - http://www.healthcareforums.com
BIOMEDICAL FORUM found under the main topic - Field of Medical Specialty
Worldwide Healthcare Forums SITE TRANSLATIONS:
Deutsch Healthcare FORUMS - http://www.healthcareforums.com/wwwboard/index4.html
Español Healthcare FORUMS - http://www.healthcareforums.com/wwwboard/index5.html
Français Healthcare FORUMS -
http://www.healthcareforums.com/wwwboard/index6.html

*COMING SOON*
Japanese Healthcare FORUMS
Chinese Healthcare FORUMS

----------------------------------
NEW SUPER SEARCH ENGINE PAGE with 28 ENGINES 
http://www.healthcareforums.com/Sengines.html

----------------------------------
POST A MESSAGE & START THREAD AT

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
www.healthcareforums.com
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||     




From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Fri Sep 12 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!newsfeeds.sol.net!news.pagesat.net!news.itis.com!not-for-mail
From: Petr Kuzmic <pkuzmic@biokin.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Software available: (bio)chemical kinetics and equilibria
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 14:43:15 -0500
Organization: BioKin Consulting
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <341AECD3.CDB146A2@biokin.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: k11.itis.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)

_____________________________________________________
              PUBLIC DOMAIN PROGRAM DYNAFIT AVAILABLE

DynaFit is a program for simulation and least-squares
fitting of biochemical kinetic data.  The user enters
the reaction mechanism symbolically, such as this:

; "Slow, tight" inhibition of HIV proteinase
                                            
[mechanism]                                 
   E + S <==> ES     :     k       ks       
   ES ---> E + P     :     kr               
   E + I <==> EI     :     k1      k2       
   EI <==> EJ        :     k3      k4       

The machine then derives the underlying system of 
differential equations (to compute the time-course of
the reaction) or algebraic equations (to compute the 
composision at equilibrium). 

_____________________________________________________
                                        TEST PROBLEMS

The program should be downloaded along with a set of
test examples, all of them based on real experimental
mostly from biochemical kinetics, but the same methods
can be used for other areas of chemistry and biology.

_____________________________________________________
                                              REVIEWS

A reviewer had this to say about DynaFit: "If you do any 
kind of kinetic data analysis as part of your research 
program, be sure to download DynaFit from the BioKin Web 
site."  (HMS Beagle Newsletter "Software Alert", volume
1997 No. 9).

_____________________________________________________
                                                LINKS

http://www.biokin.com/                    BioKin home
http://www.biokin.com/dynafit/index.shtml ... DynaFit

_____________________________________________________
                                           REFERENCES

P. Kuzmic (1996) Anal. Biochem. 237, 260-273.

_____________________________________________________________
Petr Kuzmic Ph.D. * BioKin Ltd. * Madison, WI 53708-8336, USA
pkuzmic@biokin.com * http://www.biokin.com * 608.256.1269 fax

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Tue Sep 16 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!internet!biosci!not-for-mail
From: biohelp (BIOSCI Administrator)
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: BIOSCI/bionet miniFAQ & Fundraiser
Date: 17 Sep 1997 02:00:05 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 233
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199709170900.CAA27951@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

(LAST REVISION: 30-JUL-95)

This BIOSCI "miniFAQ" is designed to answer the questions that come up
the *most frequently*.  The main BIOSCI FAQ (Frequently Asked
Questions) is accessible on the World Wide Web at URL
http://www.bio.net/.

If you can not find an answer to your question in this or other
documentation, the BIOSCI technical support staff answers e-mail
queries sent to

		       biosci-help@net.bio.net

We can only answer questions about the use of the newsgroups and
mailing lists.  We unfortunately do not have the staff to do Internet
information searches or answer scientific questions.  Please post
those to the appropriate BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.


	Contents:
	--------
	0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!

	1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.

	2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.

	3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.

	4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.


0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!
------------------------------
BIOSCI's government funding has been expended, and we are now
operating solely from advertising revenue that we have raised from our
Web site at http://www.bio.net/.  We need just a few minutes of your
time to help us serve you.

You can do two important things which will take very little time for
you individually and will immensely help us continue to help you.

First, please use our WWW system at http://www.bio.net/ to access the
archives.  You can post or reply to messages via your Web browser as
described in item #1 below.  Your usage helps attract sponsors. If you
contact any of our sponsors, please be sure to thank them for
supporting BIOSCI. It is critical for them to get this feedback if
they are to continue their sponsorship for the long term.

Second, if you work for a company or organization that provides
products or services of interest to the biology community, please pass
this message on to your marketing or marketing communications
department or other appropriate group.  Please ask them to help
support BIOSCI by sponsoring our Web site and explain the uses and
benefits of the system to the biology community. If they are
interested, they can then contact us for further information at our
tech support address, biosci-help@net.bio.net.


1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.
--------------------------------------------------------
As of 10 December 1995, all BIOSCI/bionet full newsgroups are
accessible through the World Wide Web (WWW) at URL http://www.bio.net.
One can read and reply publicly or privately to both recent postings
and archived messages through one's Web browser if it is configured
properly to send e-mail.  Each newsgroup is equipped with its own WAIS
index.  The main BIOSCI home page also has access to the BIO-JOURNALS
Table of Contents database WAIS index and the BIOSCI user address
database described in another item further below.


2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.
-------------------------------------------------------
BIOSCI is a set of parallel USENET newsgroups (the "bionet" groups),
mailing lists, and a hypermail archive at URL http://www.bio.net/.
The same postings are distributed on all media (except for a small
number of mailing-list-only groups at net.bio.net).  Unfortunately it
is becoming a despicable practice on the Internet (by a few people out
to make a fast buck) to do automated mass postings to thousands of
newsgroups and mailing lists.  These attempts to grab free advertising
are refered to as "spams" in the usual, somewhat boneheaded, net
terminology.  USENET is more susceptible to this practice, and many
spams originate on the USENET groups and then are passed on to the
mailing lists.  However, spammers also get lists of mailing addresses
and hit these too, so neither medium is immune.

What should you do personally if you get junk mail?
---------------------------------------------------
Just delete it and move on without reading it further.  Filing a
protest is becoming increasingly useless because spammers are often
disguising the addresses where the messages are sent from.  Unless you
really understand Internet mail systems, your attempt at protest by
sending replies to the message will often end up being sent to the
address of an innocent person that the spammer is victimizing.

What can BIOSCI/bionet do to protect its newsgroups?
----------------------------------------------------
The only solution currently available is to moderate the newsgroup.
If this newsgroup is already moderated, then you are in good shape.
Moderation protects the USENET distribution from about 95% of the
spams that are being sent to date and protects the mailing lists
completely.  Moderation means, however, that someone has to take the
time to review each message before it goes out.  We have set up
software here that simply allows the moderator to forward to an
address at net.bio.net messages that (s)he wishes to have distributed.
This takes no more time than that needed to read the message and pass
it on, say about 1 min. per message.

Most newsgroups currently have a discussion leader who is responsible
for their newsgroup.  The discussions leaders and their e-mail
addresses are listed in the BIOSCI Information Sheet which is
available on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  If a newsgroup is being
hit with too many junk postings, please contact the discussion leader
for that group and see if there is interest in moderating the group.
Please do not assume that by simply posting a complaint to the
newsgroup itself, anyone on the BIOSCI staff will act on your
complaint.  With close to 100 newsgroups to run, the BIOSCI staff has
to rely on the discussion leaders of each newsgroup to report problems
directly to us at biosci-help@net.bio.net.

We will moderate any of our newsgroups if the discussion leader tells
us that the readership of the group wishes to do so and if a moderator
is willing to do the work.  For most BIOSCI/bionet groups, this
entails only a few minutes of work each day.

Moderating a newsgroup will resolve probably 95% of the junk postings
on the USENET distribution.  Unfortunately there are easy ways for
determined spammers to override the moderation mechanism on USENET,
but we can protect our e-mail subscribers from unwanted postings if
the newsgroup is moderated.  You can also access our newsgroups over
the WWW at URL http://www.bio.net.  While this Web interface will not
stop spammers from trying to post to the groups, this will give you
yet another way, besides using USENET news, to keep the junk out of
your personal mail files.  For those of you with local USENET news
systems, the Web interface will also give you faster access to new
newsgroups and recent postings.


3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.
------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE NOTE: The BIOSCI management does NOT act on
subscription/unsubscription requests that are posted improperly to the
newsgroups and mailing lists.  People who do this only bother everyone
on the lists to no avail.  Please be sure to follow the proper
procedures below.

Gory details are in the BIOSCI Information sheets on the Web at
http://www.bio.net.  Below we give an example utilizing the
METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list at both of our two BIOSCI sites:

Users in the Americas and Pacific Rim countries who use the BIOSCI
------------------------------------------------------------------
node at computer net.bio.net:
----------------------------

A) Determine the "listname" which is the <=8 character mail address
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   for the group.  These can be found in the BIOSCI Info. Sheet.  For
   the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS group the mailing address is
   methods@net.bio.net.  The listname is the portion of the address to
   the left of the @ sign, i.e., "methods".  The listname is used with
   the "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" commands illustrated below.

B) Mail all commands in the body of a mail message addressed to
   biosci-server@net.bio.net.  Do NOT send commands to the newsgroup
   posting addresses!  Leave the Subject: line blank, any text on it
   will be ignored.

C) In the body of your message put one or more of the following
   commands with an "end" command on the last line, e.g.,

   subscribe methods
   unsubscribe methods
   end

   Do NOT put your e-mail address or other text on these lines.  The
   server only allows you to cancel your subscription if the address
   on your mail header matches the address on our mailing list.
   Please ask for help at biosci-help@net.bio.net if your address has
   changed, e.g., if you know you are on the list but the server tells
   you that you are not a member.


Users in Europe, Africa, and Central Asia who use the BIOSCI node at
--------------------------------------------------------------------
computer daresbury.ac.uk (also known as dl.ac.uk):
-------------------------------------------------

To subscribe and unsubscribe to/from the BIOSCI lists, you need to
specify the full USENET newsgroup name with "bionet-news." prepended.
The USENET newsgroup names are listed in the BIOSCI Information sheet
on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  For the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list
the USENET newsgroup name is bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts, thus the
appropriate commands are

    sub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

    unsub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

These commands are included in a message addressed to mxt@dl.ac.uk,
NOT to the newsgroup mailing addresses.  As usual, include the text in
the body of the message as text on the Subject: line is ignored.

To unsubscribe from all the lists at the UK node, use

    unsub bionet-news

Please note that if the address in the list is different than the one
in your mail message header, you will not be able to unsubscribe by
this method. If you have problems, please mail biosci@daresbury.ac.uk.


4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Please take this opportunity to add your name, address, and research
interest information to the BIOSCI User Address Database if you have
not already done so.

You can fill out the address form directly through our Web page at URL
http://www.bio.net/adrform.html.

The address database is reindexed nightly for WWW access (the URL is
http://www.bio.net/).  If you are not directly on the Internet but can
reach it by e-mail, please use our waismail server to access the user
directory.  waismail use is described above.  You can also request a
user address form by e-mail from biosci-help@net.bio.net.

Please check your database entry from time-to-time to see if your
address information is still up-to-date.  Because of our limited
personnel resources, we ask that you resubmit a *complete* form to
revise your entry; we only replace complete entries and do not have
resources to edit old forms.


From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Wed Sep 17 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!139.130.235.93!news.telstra.net!loomi.telstra.net!not-for-mail
From: John Wickham <johnshel@real.net.au>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: JRAK equipment
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 22:17:24 -0700
Organization: Sonic Seeker Developments
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <34220AE4.2178@real.net.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mercury.real.net.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win95; I; 16bit)
Cache-Post-Path: mercury.real.net.au!unknown@syd-pm2-26.real.net.au


********************* JRAK Biosignals Close Out Sale 
********************************

JRAK Biosignals has made quality equipment for the medical and 
physiological 
research fraternerty for over 10 years. We are quitting this market as 
the
world of physiological reaserch has moved on to other areas such as 
biotechnology etc.
Thus we are offering a final opportunity to our customers to get 
equipment at a 50%
discount.

JRAK will continue to service and support our existing customers, but 
will not make 
any more equipment of this type.

This is a list of our current stock, selling for 50% of the list price.

									
List Price
Instrumentation Racks
	1x	RK8	Instrumentation Rack (240V)			
$1285

Rack-mounted modules
	1x	SA.1	Dual channel Scaling Amplifier			
$620
	1x	PA.2	Pressure Amplifer				
$920
	1x	WD.1	Window Discriminator				
$790
	1x	ST.1	Isolated Stimulator				
$880
	1x	BA.1	Biological Amplifier				
$1090
	1x	BA.2	Isoloated biological amplifier			
$1425
	2x	NR.1	Nerve Ratemeter					
$1090 ea
	1x	EI.1	EMG Integrator					
$870
	1x	IA.1	Intracellular/Microelectrode			
$1090
			Amplifier
	1x	F.1	Dual channel Signal Filter			
$795
	1x	MA.1	Audio Monitor					
$590

Stand-Alone Units
	2x	BA.2b	Isolated Biological Amplifiers			
$1425 ea
	1x	IA.1b	Intracellular/Microelectrode Amplifier		
$1290
	1x	MA.1b	Audio Monitor					
$790

Analogue-Digital Converter
	1x	JLINK A/D Converter - with JVIEW software		
$2250

Note:

Prices are in $AUS, FOB melbourne and exclude sales tax.

Reply to johnshel&real.net.au  or david.walker@med.monash.edu.au
for further information.

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Wed Sep 17 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!europa.clark.net!4.1.16.34!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!prodigy.com!prodigy.com!not-for-mail
From: york@ibm.net
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Manuscripts/Wanted/writers
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 02:54:48
Organization: Prodigy Services Corp
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <5vqj47$rma$12@newssvr04-int.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: port66.myer.prodigy.net

We/are the International Literary Agency of New York. We also have 2 
other branches, one in the Lake George region of New York and the
other in Marco Island, Florida, consequently we are able to accept new
clients. Please adhere strictly to the following guidelines for submission
of all fiction & nonfiction.
Fiction: Brief synopsis, first chapter, self-addressed, stamped envelope (S.A.S.E.)
Nonfiction: Brief synopsis, first chapter, S.A.S.E.
Screenplays: (for TV & Movies) Brief synopsis, first 20 pages, S.A.S.E.
Short Stories: Brief synopsis, first 3 pages, S.A.S.E.
Poetry: Send in 3 of your best poems only, S.A.S.E.

>>>Woodside International Literary Agency
33-29 58 Street
Woodside, New York  11377
(718) 651-8145

Please do not send in complete manuscript unless invited.



From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Thu Sep 18 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!europa.clark.net!4.1.16.34!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!prodigy.com!nntp.earthlink.net!usenet
From: prismx@earthlink.net (Claire Haller)
Newsgroups: bionet.neuroscience,bionet.biophysics,bionet.cellbiol
Subject: SCIENCE-WEEK: This Week's Headlines (19 Sep 97)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 02:00:47 GMT
Organization: SCIENCE-WEEK
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <5vsmge$s5e@suriname.earthlink.net>
Reply-To: prismx@earthlink.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.36.139.39
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: biosci bionet.neuroscience:20337 bionet.biophysics:3518 bionet.cellbiol:8086

Headlines in This Week's SCIENCE-WEEK (September 19, 1997)
[complete digests free at http://members.aol.com/sciweek]

A Criticism of Nomenclature in Molecular Biology
Heavy Elements Finally Named
India Sterile-Mosquito Project to be Revived
A Summary of Current Mars Mission Results
On Coherent Spin States of Optically Excited Electrons
On Analysis of Self-Organizing Polymeric Materials
Lungfish Replaces Coelacanth As Closest to Land Animals
Complete Sequencing of E. Coli Genome
On the Use of Yeast as a Model for Eukaryotic Biology
First Determination of Prion Protein Structure
Induced Reversal of Kinesin Motion in Cells
Fluorescent Protein Analysis of Eukaryotic Cell Secretion
Evidence for Differing Roles of the Two Estrogen Receptors
An Analysis of Sickle Cell Disease
Evidence for Linkage Between AIDS and Malaria

The Editors
SCIENCE-WEEK
A Free Weekly Digest of the News of Science
prismx@earthlink.net
http://members.aol.com/sciweek


From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Fri Sep 19 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: <RUMYM@BGEARN.ACAD.BG>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: How much is the useful work? (Pentcho Valev)
Date: 20 Sep 1997 10:13:30 +0100
Lines: 62
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <60043q$fmg@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Original-To: biophys@dl.ac.uk

(I am sorry for writing my name in the subject space - the reason is that
my messages are archived under somebody else's name).

   Some time ago I tried to start a discussion about useful work and the
validity of the second law in general, but my arguments were either vague
or wrong so the group was probably right not to pay much attention to
them. Still everybody would agree that research of this kind is too painful -
it always seems psychopathic at first, most often it is, so the reaction is
always hostile and the author doomed to failure. Yet I do not think that
problems of this kind should not be discussed - after all, heresy has
always been an important factor in science (although heretics are sometimes
burned).
   This time I am presenting an almost obvious example showing a violation
of the second law. What is even more interesting is the theoretical
generalization which is in fact a development of the classical thermodynamic
concept of useful work. If correct, the new results will have a tremendous
effect on quantitative bioenergetics.

   Please consider the following system:

   NaCl (high concentration)       M       NaCl (low concentration)

where M is a membrane permeable only to Na+ (not even to water).
   At equilibrium, a capacitor-like double layer will be formed at the
membrane, positive on the right side and negative on the left one.
Accordingly, there will  be a transmembrane potential difference which will
be maximal at equilibrium. But this means that the process can be
presented in the following way:

     Na+(left)  =  Na+(right)  +  el. potential (work)           /1/

In fact, this is a reaction which produces work at equilibrium, in violation
of the second law| We can easily imagine an isothermal cyclical process in
which work is gained: The electrical potential does some work (e.g. pushes
some different ions through the membrane or just shifts the electrometer)
and decreases. This shifts /1/ to the right. As the
work production stops, the initial equilibrium is restored.
   I cannot see how one can refute this perpetuum mobile. One will have to
prove either that the el. potential cannot do work (?|) or that the
reaction is not reversible (?|).
   The generalization of this case leads to the following result: The
meximum useful work that can be extracted from a chemical reaction is not
-(delta G), but rather -(delta G  +  delta H). In this particular case
delta G = 0, so, as can be seen, Wmax = -(delta H).

   It would be interesting to examine other cases. For galvanic reactions,
the delta H component cannot be done, i.e. the heat of reaction is
immaterial to the work done. Vice versa, if the same reaction occurs not
in a galvanic system, i.e. the electron transfer is direct,  the delta G
component is not normally produced, i.e. W = -(delta H).

   Tha last case is representative of many bioenergetic processes. For
the ATP-ADP system, again, W = -(delta H). This is an expression of
the obvious fact  that, in the elementary chemical act,  one molecule ATP
can only use its internal energy for doing work.

At the moment I can only present theoretical cases in which the maximum
work Wmax = -(delta G  +  delta H)  is done, but am sure that
somewhere in the living system this work is obtained  -  Nature cannot have
missed this opportunity.

Pentcho Valev

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Sat Sep 20 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!hammer.uoregon.edu!news.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.nacamar.de!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!news.misty.com!nntp.upenn.edu!axe1.med.upenn.edu!axelsen
From: axelsen@axe1.med.upenn.edu (Paul H Axelsen)
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: POSTDOCTORAL POSITIONS AVAILABLE: Molecular Recognition and Membrane Biophysics
Date: 21 Sep 1997 23:22:19 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <604a7b$15q$4@netnews.upenn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: axe1.med.upenn.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2-upenn1.1]

Projects involve the use of novel spectroscopic techniques (infrared and UV)
and mass spectrometry to study the behavior of antibiotics, fusogenic peptides,
and blood coagulation proteins on lipid membranes with a view towards rational
drug design.  The laboratory is stably funded and the positions are available 
immediately.  Applicants MUST be available for interview prior to appointment.
Persons with a talent for mastering sophisticated new technology, and seeking 
to work on important biomedical problems, should inquire by email to 

                      axe@pharm.med.upenn.edu
or

Prof. Paul H. Axelsen 
Departments of Pharmacology and 
  Medicine, Infectious Diseases Section 
University of Pennsylvania             
Rooms 130/131 John Morgan Bldg        
3620 Hamilton Walk               
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6084    

215-898-9238 / 9766 (tel)    
215-573-2236 (fax)
http://axe2.med.upenn.edu (www)


--

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              
Axe@pharm

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Sun Sep 21 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!hammer.uoregon.edu!mic.fibernet.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news-in-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!169.226.1.109!rebecca!euclid.wadsworth.org!tivol
From: tivol@news.wadsworth.org (William Tivol)
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Re: How much is the useful work? (Pentcho Valev)
Date: 22 Sep 1997 20:53:32 GMT
Organization: Wadsworth Center, NY Health Dept.
Lines: 97
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <606lsc$r2h@euclid.wadsworth.org>
References: <60043q$fmg@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: alcor.wadsworth.org
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

RUMYM@BGEARN.ACAD.BG wrote:

:    Some time ago I tried to start a discussion about useful work and the
: validity of the second law in general, but my arguments were either vague
: or wrong so the group was probably right not to pay much attention to
: them.

	One of the questions you addressed at that time was about the mole-
cular dynamics of how to get more work out of ATP hydrolysis than delta H.
I read up on this, and here is what I found:
	First, consider a simpler system--a solution of ADP and Pi.  Since
the equilibrium constant for the reaction ATP + H2O -> ADP + Pi is not in-
finite, the second law predicts that in a solution of ADP and Pi there will
be condsensations which produce ATP.  On the molecular level this can be
explained by considering collisions between ADP and Pi.  The molecules in
this system have a distribution of kinetic energies, vibrational and rota-
tional states, etc., which I will assume are Maxwellian.  Therefore, some
of the collisions will be between ADP and Pi molecules which have enough
total energy to produce ATP.  Of these collisions, a fraction will occur
with the correct orientation, and ATP will, indeed, be produced.  As this
process continues, there will come a time when there are just the right
concentrations of ADP, ATP, Pi and H2O so that for each collision which
produces ATP there will be a collision of ATP with H2O which produces ADP
and Pi.  At this point, the system is in equilibrium.  As for your example,
which concerned ATP hydrolysis and electrical potentials across a membrane,
similar considerations of the energy content in the individual molecules
undergoing the reaction can be sufficient to produce the reaction (and ra-
pidly, if the concentrations of reactants and products make delta G nega-
tive).  As you pointed out, the total energy of the system is unchanged,
and, therefore, the energy which went into the chemical bonds must be sub-
tracted from the total kinetic (& vib + rot, etc.) energy of the system,
so the temperature will decrease.

: Still everybody would agree that research of this kind is too painful -
: it always seems psychopathic at first, most often it is, so the reaction is
: always hostile and the author doomed to failure. Yet I do not think that
: problems of this kind should not be discussed - after all, heresy has
: always been an important factor in science (although heretics are sometimes
: burned).

	If one can't stand the flames, one shouldn't think about these things
(At least one shouldn't post them on the internet. ;-))

:    This time I am presenting an almost obvious example showing a violation
: of the second law. What is even more interesting is the theoretical
: generalization which is in fact a development of the classical thermodynamic
: concept of useful work. If correct, the new results will have a tremendous
: effect on quantitative bioenergetics.

:    Please consider the following system:

:    NaCl (high concentration)       M       NaCl (low concentration)

: where M is a membrane permeable only to Na+ (not even to water).
:    At equilibrium, a capacitor-like double layer will be formed at the
: membrane, positive on the right side and negative on the left one.
: Accordingly, there will  be a transmembrane potential difference which will
: be maximal at equilibrium. But this means that the process can be
: presented in the following way:

:      Na+(left)  =  Na+(right)  +  el. potential (work)           /1/

: In fact, this is a reaction which produces work at equilibrium, in violation
: of the second law| We can easily imagine an isothermal cyclical process in
: which work is gained: The electrical potential does some work (e.g. pushes
: some different ions through the membrane or just shifts the electrometer)
: and decreases. This shifts /1/ to the right. As the
: work production stops, the initial equilibrium is restored.
:    I cannot see how one can refute this perpetuum mobile. One will have to
: prove either that the el. potential cannot do work (?|) or that the
: reaction is not reversible (?|).

	If you look at the electrical potential far from the membrane, it
goes to zero on each side.  There are enough excess Cl- on the left and Na+
on the right to balance everything.  The excess Cl- will be distributed on
the left such that [Cl-] = const*exp(-eV/kT), where one still has to cal-
culate V, and the same applies to the Na+ on the right.  Since there are
just as many + charges as -, virtually all the electric field lines will 
be confined to a finite distance from the membrane (yes, some of the lines
will loop around through a plane at any finite distance from the membrane,
but they will assymtotically approach zero at large distances).  If you
put electrodes near the membrane in an attempt to extract work from the
system, you will move it off equilibrium, and some work can be extracted
as equilibrium is re-established, but you will not get perpetual motion.

:    Tha last case is representative of many bioenergetic processes. For
: the ATP-ADP system, again, W = -(delta H). This is an expression of
: the obvious fact  that, in the elementary chemical act,  one molecule ATP
: can only use its internal energy for doing work.

	It can also use its kinetic energy and any vib, rot & electronic
energy if it is not in the ground state.  Thermodynamics predicts that
some molecules will not be in the ground state.

: Pentcho Valev
				Yours,
				Bill Tivol

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Sun Sep 21 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!rutgers!gatech!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.he.net!news.pagesat.net!news.itis.com!not-for-mail
From: Petr Kuzmic <pkuzmic@biokin.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Re: How much is the useful work? (Pentcho Valev)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 14:41:34 -0500
Organization: BioKin Consulting
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <3426C9EE.1E1E808B@biokin.com>
References: <605tr4$1lo@mserv1.dl.ac.uk> <tkordas-2209971256040001@farmr37.med.uth.tmc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: s22.itis.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)

Timothy J. Kordas wrote:

> You've just re-invented the battery. Your potential drops steadily (doing
> work) until equilibrium is reached. Congratulations.
> 
> **
> 
> Does anyone else read these things, or am I just a sucker ?

   I read 'these things' as brain-teasers on coffee-breaks.  My strategy
is to skip the details that describe exactly how the newest perpetuum
mobile works.  At this stage of the game, I simply wait for an elegant
and insightful refutation... 

      -Petr

_____________________________________________________________
Petr Kuzmic Ph.D. * BioKin Ltd. * Madison, WI 53708-8336, USA
pkuzmic@biokin.com * http://www.biokin.com * 608.256.1269 fax

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Sun Sep 21 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!news.uh.edu!news.uth.tmc.edu!farmr37.med.uth.tmc.edu!user
From: tkordas@gsbs3.gs.uth.tmc.edu (Timothy J. Kordas)
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Re: How much is the useful work? (Pentcho Valev)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 12:56:04 -0600
Organization: UT Houston Medical School
Lines: 54
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <tkordas-2209971256040001@farmr37.med.uth.tmc.edu>
References: <605tr4$1lo@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: farmr37.med.uth.tmc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.3.1

<RUMYM@BGEARN.ACAD.BG> wrote:

[given a system as illustrated here]
>    NaCl (high concentration)       M       NaCl (low concentration)    <
> 
> where M is a membrane permeable only to Na+ (not even to water).       <
[we get]
>    At equilibrium, a capacitor-like double layer will be formed at the <
> membrane, positive on the right side and negative on the left one.     <
> Accordingly, there will  be a transmembrane potential difference which will
> be maximal at equilibrium. But this means that the process can be      <
> presented in the following way:                                        <
> 
>      Na+(left)  =  Na+(right)  +  el. potential (work)           /1/      <

[and a situation is proposed:]
> For instance: Some neutral molecule
> approaches the membrane where an enzyme splits it into a positive and a
> negative part:
> 
>    A  =  B+  +  C-
> 
> Obviously B+ will be pushed to the left and C- to the right, i.e. they can
> be separated at the membrane and this is electrical work. Again, this is not
> exactly perpetuum mobile, but the more important conclusion remains: the
> system can do work at equilibrium. So let me present the problem in its most
> general form.

In your hypothetical situation you've used the membrane potential to
split the species B and C into different compartments. However, by adding
anions to the cation-compartment (the left-hand one in your illustration)
while at the same time added cations to the anion-compartment (the right-hand
compartment in your illustration).

When calculating the membrane potential, you must account for all ions
involved, regardless of their ability to permeate the membrane. Your
membrane model does work just fine, but you had to put work into it!
You only maintain the Na and Cl distributions across the membrane by
putting work into the system: biological membranes, mostly, use the
Na/K-ATPase powered by ATP generated from oxidation of fuel.

You've just re-invented the battery. Your potential drops steadily (doing
work) until equilibrium is reached. Congratulations.

**

Does anyone else read these things, or am I just a sucker ?

-Tim

-- 
Timothy J. Kordas
UT-Houston Medical School
Dept. of Pharmacology

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Sun Sep 21 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: <RUMYM@BGEARN.ACAD.BG>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: How much is the useful work? (Pentcho Valev)
Date: 22 Sep 1997 15:03:16 +0100
Lines: 66
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <605tr4$1lo@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Original-To: biophys@dl.ac.uk

There is a mistake in my message of 20 September, in the interpretation
of the following system:



   NaCl (high concentration)       M       NaCl (low concentration)    <

where M is a membrane permeable only to Na+ (not even to water).       <
   At equilibrium, a capacitor-like double layer will be formed at the <
membrane, positive on the right side and negative on the left one.     <
Accordingly, there will  be a transmembrane potential difference which will
be maximal at equilibrium. But this means that the process can be      <
presented in the following way:                                        <

     Na+(left)  =  Na+(right)  +  el. potential (work)           /1/      <
                                                                          <
In fact, this is a reaction which produces work at equilibrium, in violation
of the second law| We can easily imagine an isothermal cyclical process in <
which work is gained: The electrical potential does some work (e.g. pushes <
some different ions through the membrane or just shifts the electrometer)  <
and decreases. This shifts /1/ to the right. As the                        <
work production stops, the initial equilibrium is restored.                <

First of all, perpetuum mobile is impossible if MACROwork is done, i.e.
"shifting the electrometer" is a wrong example. Secondly, the reaction on
which work is done must be IRREVERSIBLE. For instance: Some neutral molecule
approaches the membrane where an enzyme splits it into a positive and a
negative part:

   A  =  B+  +  C-

Obviously B+ will be pushed to the left and C- to the right, i.e. they can
be separated at the membrane and this is electrical work. Again, this is not
exactly perpetuum mobile, but the more important conclusion remains: the
system can do work at equilibrium. So let me present the problem in its most
general form.

   Let the reaction  A = B  drive the reaction  C = D:

   A + C = B + D

A = B itself is at equilibrium, but the concentration of D is zero so
the coupled reaction still goes to the right. Also, A = B is exothermic and
C = D is endothermic.
   What is this? A = B drives C = D  by giving it some of its energy; is
this work done by A = B on C = D or just heat exchange? The question  is
not only theoretical: if C = D is some biopolimer synthesis, the
concentration of D is practically zero (there is no reverse reaction), so
does ATP do work in this case or not?

   In fact, all problems arise when classical thermodynamics face
irreversibility. My approach differs from irreversible thermodynamics and
is based on the following obvious (in my opinion) definition: When a
system transfers energy to another system and the process is ISOTHERMAL,
the system DOES WORK on the other system. It follows that, when the
system is a chemical reaction, the maximum work that can be produced in
this way is equal to the enthalpy of reaction.

   I hope that this purely chemical aspect will attract more attention than
the teasing examples demonstrating violation of the second law. It can also
be shown that the delta G component of the maximal work is always macroscopic
(as could be expected - it comes from classical thermodynamics), whereas
the delta H component is in fact chemical work in the narrow sense - it is
always microscopic.

Pentcho

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Sun Sep 21 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!howland.erols.net!newsxfer3.itd.umich.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!audrey02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: huntpharm@aol.com (Huntpharm)
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: US-CT-JOB OPPORTUNITY IN BONE RESEARCH
Date: 22 Sep 1997 13:07:51 GMT
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <19970922130701.JAA00957@ladder02.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder02.news.aol.com
X-Admin: news@aol.com
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
SnewsLanguage: English

I am looking for a Scientist to lead a lab unit in the Osteoporsis
Research department to support the identification of therapeutic targets
for osteoporosis.  You will participate in the analysis of potential
therapeutics through the use of biochemical and cellular biological assays.
 The candidate will develop new approaches to the determination of drug
action on bone cells and tissues both in vitro and ex vivo.  You should
possess a PhD in Biology, Cell Biology, Biochemistry, or related field with
2 years postdoctoral experience. We are a leading  pharmaceutical company
with research facilities in Conneticut and can provide excellent benefits
(health insurance, dental, and vision plan, bonus program, paid vactation
and more). A high impact, high profile position with excellent opportunity
for advancement.  Please contact Scott Shanes by phone at 609-584-8733 Ext.
218, fax CV and cover letter to 609-584-9575 or E-Mail to sis@dmc10.com


From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Mon Sep 22 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: Yu Wai Chen <ywc@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: question about EPR
Date: 23 Sep 1997 09:00:02 -0700
Organization: MRC Centre for Protein Engineering
Lines: 15
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3427B81E.452E1C7F@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Dear all,

I am interested in obtaining structural information about a protein
which forms aggregates in physiological conditions.  Do you think I can
use site-directed spin labelling and then EPR to get side-chain mobility
data?  Can EPR be run on aggregated samples?  What other techniques
would you suggest?

Thanks.  Any advice would be appreciated.
-- 
===================================================================
Yu Wai CHEN, Ph.D. ..................  email: ywc@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
 Centre for Protein Engineering,              tel: 44-(1223) 402148
 MRC Centre, Cambridge  CB2 2QH, U.K.         fax: 44-(1223) 402140
 WWW homepage: http://www.mrc-cpe.cam.ac.uk/people/wai.html

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Mon Sep 22 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: <RUMYM@BGEARN.ACAD.BG>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Work done by ATP (Pentcho Valev)
Date: 23 Sep 1997 15:07:17 +0100
Lines: 68
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <608iel$gaf@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Original-To: biophys@dl.ac.uk

Bill Tivol wrote:
    One of the questions you addressed at that time was about the mole-  <
cular dynamics of how to get more work out of ATP hydrolysis than delta H. <
I read up on this, and here is what I found:                               <
    First, consider a simpler system--a solution of ADP and Pi.  Since        <
the equilibrium constant for the reaction ATP + H2O -> ADP + Pi is not in- <
finite, the second law predicts that in a solution of ADP and Pi there will<
be condsensations which produce ATP.  On the molecular level this can be   <
explained by considering collisions between ADP and Pi.  The molecules in  <
this system have a distribution of kinetic energies, vibrational and rota- <
tional states, etc., which I will assume are Maxwellian.  Therefore, some  <
of the collisions will be between ADP and Pi molecules which have enough   <
total energy to produce ATP.  Of these collisions, a fraction will occur   <
with the correct orientation, and ATP will, indeed, be produced.  As this  <
process continues, there will come a time when there are just the right    <
concentrations of ADP, ATP, Pi and H2O so that for each collision which    <
produces ATP there will be a collision of ATP with H2O which produces ADP  <
and Pi.  At this point, the system is in equilibrium.  As for your example,<
which concerned ATP hydrolysis and electrical potentials across a membrane,<
similar considerations of the energy content in the individual molecules   <
undergoing the reaction can be sufficient to produce the reaction (and ra- <
pidly, if the concentrations of reactants and products make delta G nega-  <
tive).  As you pointed out, the total energy of the system is unchanged,   <
and, therefore, the energy which went into the chemical bonds must be sub- <
tracted from the total kinetic (& vib + rot, etc.) energy of the system,   <
so the temperature will decrease.                                          <

Let me state again the concrete example. An ATPase transports H+ against an
electrical but not pH gradient, and the process is close to equilibrium.
The concentrations of ATP, ADP and P are such that

    delta G = delta Go + RTln((ADP)(P)/(ATP)) =  -50 KJ/mole

As delta H of ATP hydrolysis is -20 KJ/mole, the heat absorbed in the reaction
is Qr = 30 KJ/mole, i.e. as one mole ATP does work, it uses not only its
internal energy, delta H, but also absorbs 30 KJ heat from the environment
and converts it into work too. If we refer these values to one molecule ATP,
we will have to divide them by the Avogadro number.
   What is bothering is that, as we examine the elementary chemical act, we
can easily imagine how the internal energy, delta H, is converted into work
(e.g. something like discharge of a spring) but can by no means imagine
a mechanism allowing absorbtion of heat from the environment. The only
possible assumption is that only molecules ATP which have enough kinetic
energy can react, but in this case there would be a piston-like mechanism
somewhere in the ATPase allowing convertion of this kinetic energy
into work. Moreover, the ADP and P molecules must strike the piston from
the other side so that, as their concentrations decrease, the work produced
in this way get more. Quite an unrealistic picture - the only way to accept
it is to refrain from thinking in physical terms and adopt thermodynamic
formalism only.
   In fact, the delta G work can only be macroscopic - e.g. in galvanic
reactions. It can even be PV work - in fact, this is implicit in all
textbook derivations, but authors do not state it explicitly as they remember
the dogma that delta G is useful and not PV work. However V, by definition,
is the volume of the system = as long as it does not change, we can take
portions of the system, expand them etc.-the work done belongs to delta G.
However no one wants to consider this physical picture (some time ago I
made an unsuccesful attempt to discuss it in the btk-group).
   In conclusion: delta G is statistical work, a result of the simultaneous
action of many particles. Applied to a limited number of particles (the
participants in the elementary molecular act) it gets wrong. However
thermodynamics has left to the opponents to find a way to verify the
concept, and this is extremely difficult. I believe the example above
offers the only possible verification - one should determine, calorimetrically,
the heat of reaction as an ATPase transports, almost reversibly, H+ against
an electrical gradient.

Pentcho

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Mon Sep 22 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: <RUMYM@BGEARN.ACAD.BG>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: How much is the useful work? (Pentcho Valev)
Date: 23 Sep 1997 09:53:28 +0100
Lines: 46
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <608028$o1p@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Original-To: biophys@dl.ac.uk

Bill Tivol wrote:

:    NaCl (high concentration)       M       NaCl (low concentration)      <
                                                                           <
: where M is a membrane permeable only to Na+ (not even to water).         <
                                                                           <
    If you look at the electrical potential far from the membrane, it         <
goes to zero on each side.  There are enough excess Cl- on the left and Na+<
on the right to balance everything.  The excess Cl- will be distributed on <
the left such that [Cl-] = const*exp(-eV/kT), where one still has to cal-  <
culate V, and the same applies to the Na+ on the right.  Since there are   <
just as many + charges as -, virtually all the electric field lines will   <
be confined to a finite distance from the membrane (yes, some of the lines <
will loop around through a plane at any finite distance from the membrane, <
but they will assymtotically approach zero at large distances).  If you    <
put electrodes near the membrane in an attempt to extract work from the    <
system, you will move it off equilibrium, and some work can be extracted   <
as equilibrium is re-established, but you will not get perpetual motion.   <

Bill,  your first sentence is quite correct, but unfortunately it contradicts
thermodynamics. If, far from the membrane, the electrical potential goes
to zero on each side, the Na+ electrochemical potential is not uniform
throughout the system.
   This can also solve the problem with my unfortunate perpetuum mobile.
I would like to ask electrochemists: As we measure the transmembrane
potential difference, the membrane is made impermeable (e.g. another
impermeable one is placed beside it). What will happen to the value shown
by the electrometer? If it decreases, perpetuum mobile is possible.
The decrease can only be due to diffusion of ions from the membrane to
the depth of the compartments, so the electrical potential there will
slightly increase in magnitude. Restoring the permeability of the membrane
will restore the value of the electrometer, since new Na+ will cross from
left to right. This process can continue until, theoretically, the potentials
in the two phases get uniform, different and corresponding to the
concentration difference. All shiftings of the electrometer constitute the
work gained.
   Then the membrane remains permeable and the initial equilibrium (in which
the electrical potential far from the membrane is zero) is restored.
   There are two independent and easy ways to verify all this experimentally.
The first one is to measure the electrical potential far from the membrane
(I suspect your first statement is based on such a measurement).  The second
one (maybe not so easy) is to "open" and "close" the membrane consecutively
and register the value shown by the electrometer. If I had the slightest
opportunity, I would do both experiments.

Pentcho

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Mon Sep 22 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!rutgers!nntp.upenn.edu!dsinc!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!gsl-penn-ns.gsl.net!news-peer.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news-in-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!169.226.1.109!rebecca!euclid.wadsworth.org!tivol
From: tivol@news.wadsworth.org (William Tivol)
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Re: How much is the useful work? (Pentcho Valev)
Date: 23 Sep 1997 21:38:11 GMT
Organization: Wadsworth Center, NY Health Dept.
Lines: 56
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <609cs3$pbt@euclid.wadsworth.org>
References: <608028$o1p@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: alcor.wadsworth.org
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

RUMYM@BGEARN.ACAD.BG wrote:
: Bill Tivol wrote:

: :    NaCl (high concentration)       M       NaCl (low concentration)      <
:                                                                            <
: : where M is a membrane permeable only to Na+ (not even to water).         <
:                                                                            <
:     If you look at the electrical potential far from the membrane, it      <
: goes to zero on each side.  

: Bill,  your first sentence is quite correct, but unfortunately it contradicts
: thermodynamics. If, far from the membrane, the electrical potential goes
: to zero on each side, the Na+ electrochemical potential is not uniform
: throughout the system.

	I think not.  The concentration differences should balance the
electrical potential differences to produce the same electrochemical
potential throughout each compartment.  I haven't calculated either the
electrical potential or the Na & Cl distributions, so I can't prove this.

:    This can also solve the problem with my unfortunate perpetuum mobile.
: I would like to ask electrochemists: As we measure the transmembrane
: potential difference, the membrane is made impermeable (e.g. another
: impermeable one is placed beside it). What will happen to the value shown
: by the electrometer? 

	Since the electric field will penetrate a membrane unless it's
a conductor, placing an impermeable membrane beside the first one should
not change things--if the system is at equilibrium.  Placing an infinite
metal foil next to the membrane will cause the electric field between the 
membrane and the foil to change to that which would be produced by a com-
bination of the membrane and another located behind the foil and of oppo-
site charge, and the field on the other side of the foil will be that due 
to the excess Na+ or Cl- plus the appropriate mirror charges.  Once the
appropriate charge distribution is known, the potential can be calculated.

:    There are two independent and easy ways to verify all this experimentally.
: The first one is to measure the electrical potential far from the membrane
: (I suspect your first statement is based on such a measurement).

	Actually, it's based on my recent reading.

:  The second
: one (maybe not so easy) is to "open" and "close" the membrane consecutively
: and register the value shown by the electrometer. If I had the slightest
: opportunity, I would do both experiments.

	There are many biomembranes whose permeabilities can be altered by
changing experimental parameters, so this experiment is certainly possible.
The electronics necessary to make the measurements and the skill to produce
the appropriate membrane across a small hole dividing two compartments can
be obtained for a reasonable commitment of time (I'd guess ~ 1 year) and $$$
(I'd guess ~$10k).  A lab where I worked ~20 years ago did these kinds of
things routinely.
				Yours,
				Bill Tivol

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Mon Sep 22 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov!cpk-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: Universal Light Tones <zybernet@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: FASCINATING BOOKS, VIDEOS, MUSIC
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 10:55:09 -0700
Organization: Universal Light Tones
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <3428027C.D2E@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: zybernet@ix.netcom.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: lap-ca2-09.ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Sep 23 10:49:00 AM PDT 1997
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-NC320  (Win95; U)

FASCINATING & POWERFUL  VIDEOS, BOOKS, MUSIC AND
VIBRATIONAL HEALING FEATURING WORLD-CLASS ARTIST &
PERFORMERS WITH BEST SELLING AUTHORS IN MIND & BODY
MEDICINES AND THE SCIENCE.
 
Sound Healing, Contemporary Jazz/ New Age Music, Guided Relaxation,
Super Health, Documentation-Fire Walk, The Healing Sounds of
Nature-Cymatics, Mechanics of Consciousness & Creation and more.
For more info. Visit Universal light Tones Web Page.

http://www2.netcom.com/~zybernet/links.html 
or 
http://www.igdesign.com/ult

From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Mon Sep 22 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news-in-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!169.226.1.109!rebecca!euclid.wadsworth.org!tivol
From: tivol@news.wadsworth.org (William Tivol)
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: Re: Work done by ATP (Pentcho Valev)
Date: 23 Sep 1997 22:01:46 GMT
Organization: Wadsworth Center, NY Health Dept.
Lines: 70
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <609e8a$ppb@euclid.wadsworth.org>
References: <608iel$gaf@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: alcor.wadsworth.org
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

RUMYM@BGEARN.ACAD.BG wrote:
: Bill Tivol wrote:
:     One of the questions you addressed at that time was about the mole-  <
: cular dynamics of how to get more work out of ATP hydrolysis than delta H. <
: I read up on this, and here is what I found:                               <
:     First, consider a simpler system--a solution of ADP and Pi.  Since        <
: the equilibrium constant for the reaction ATP + H2O -> ADP + Pi is not in- <
: finite, the second law predicts that in a solution of ADP and Pi there will<
: be condsensations which produce ATP.  On the molecular level this can be   <
: explained by considering collisions between ADP and Pi.  The molecules in  <
: this system have a distribution of kinetic energies, vibrational and rota- <
: tional states, etc., which I will assume are Maxwellian. [skip]

: Let me state again the concrete example. An ATPase transports H+ against an
: electrical but not pH gradient, and the process is close to equilibrium.
: The concentrations of ATP, ADP and P are such that

:     delta G = delta Go + RTln((ADP)(P)/(ATP)) =  -50 KJ/mole

: As delta H of ATP hydrolysis is -20 KJ/mole, the heat absorbed in the reaction
: is Qr = 30 KJ/mole, i.e. as one mole ATP does work, it uses not only its
: internal energy, delta H, but also absorbs 30 KJ heat from the environment
: and converts it into work too. If we refer these values to one molecule ATP,
: we will have to divide them by the Avogadro number.
:    What is bothering is that, as we examine the elementary chemical act, we
: can easily imagine how the internal energy, delta H, is converted into work
: (e.g. something like discharge of a spring) but can by no means imagine
: a mechanism allowing absorbtion of heat from the environment. The only
: possible assumption is that only molecules ATP which have enough kinetic
: energy can react, but in this case there would be a piston-like mechanism
: somewhere in the ATPase allowing convertion of this kinetic energy
: into work. Moreover, the ADP and P molecules must strike the piston from
: the other side so that, as their concentrations decrease, the work produced
: in this way get more. Quite an unrealistic picture - the only way to accept
: it is to refrain from thinking in physical terms and adopt thermodynamic
: formalism only.

	Consider that the H+ is initially occupying a particular location
in a channel of the protein on the more negative side of the membrane, and
the H+ has no access to the far side:

				|
			      __|__
			      H+_
			       / \
				|
				|

Suppose that ATP hydrolysis alters the channel so that the H+ no longer has 
access to the original side of the membrane, but its spatial location (and
perhaps the electrical potential there) is unchanged:

				|
			      __|__
			     |H+_
			      ~~ \
				|
				|

The ADP and Pi readily leave the ATPase, since their concentrations are low
(necessary for the concentration term in your eqn to be large & negative).
At this point, it is easy to see how energy transfer to the H+ could leave
it with enough energy to travel to other parts of the far side compartment,
whereupon the ATPase can revert to its original conformation.  No special
mechanism is required to transfer energy from the environment.  Your pro-
posal to measure the heat change of the environment may be difficult, but
I think it can be done with modern calorimeters.
				Yours,
				Bill Tivol


From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Tue Sep 23 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!feed1.news.erols.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!alan
From: alan@ebi.ac.uk (Alan Robinson)
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: ANNOUNCE: Conference on Visualisation for the Life Sciences
Date: 24 Sep 1997 08:45:25 GMT
Organization: EBI - European Bioinformatics Institute
Lines: 146
Message-ID: <60ajv5$4q$3@niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: uranus.ebi.ac.uk
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

     Frontiers in Visualisation and Human-Computer Interaction '97

             "Visualising the Future of the Life Sciences"


            The Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK. 

                      10th and 11th December, 1997

                       http://www.ebi.ac.uk/fiv97/

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

                            Conference Theme

This two day conference will provide an outstanding opportunity to hear 
some of the world's leading speakers in the related areas of human-
computer interaction and visualisation.

Review talks on the current uses of visualisation in the biosciences.

An arena for professionals in the biosciences and pharmacology to meet 
with the leading graphics and interaction experts and to develop new 
ideas and synergies.

Hence a major Conference Theme could be expressed as "How can 
Visualisation be used to extract Information and Knowledge from the 
Data of these Sciences?"


                   Keynote Speakers on Visualisation

The two keynote speakers are: 

Professor Andries van Dam, Thomas J. Watson, Jr., University Professor 
of Technology and Education and Professor of Computer Science, Brown 
University, Providence, RI and

Prof. Dr. Josi Luis Encarnagco, Professor Technical University of 
Darmstadt and Director of the Fraunhofer Institute for Computer 
Graphics in Darmstadt.

Both speakers have been visionary pioneers in establishing the 
discipline of computer graphics, Van Dam being a founder of SIGGRAPH 
and Encarnagco being the driving force behind the founding of 
EUROGRAPHICS.


                           Invited Speakers

Professor Paolo Zanella, Head of the European Bioinformatics Institute 
and Chair in the Faculty of Sciences, Department of Informatics of the 
University of Geneva.

Dr. Jonathan K.C. Knowles, formerly Director of Glaxo Wellcome Research 
Europe and now Director of Global Research of Hoffmann-La Roche.

Dr. Detlev Kroemker, Head of the Animation and HD-Image Communication
Department of the Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics. 

Dr. Jean-Francis Balaguer, Technology Manager for 3D Graphics, artemedia
online, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Professor Philip E. Bourne, Senior Staff Scientist at the San Diego
Supercomputer Center , an Associate Adjunct Professor in the Department 
of Pharmacology at the University of California San Diego, and an 
Adjunct Senior Scientist at the Burnham Institute.

Dr. Michael Berman, General Manager of Silicon Graphics Biomedical Ltd.,
a subsidiary of SGI based in Jerusalem, Israel.

Dr. Alan Robinson, Visualisation Support for the BioStandards Initiative
at the European Bioinforatics Institute.

John Wise, currently Head of IT at the Imperial Cancer Research Fund,
soon to be Head of Non-Clinical Development Information Management at 
Roche.

Dr. Chris Jones is currently on sabbatical leave at the European 
Bioinformatics Institute from CERN where he has been responsible for
most IT services including a virtual reality project prototyping the
next major accelarator and experiments for the year 2005.


                         Conference Programme

The Conference Agenda will cover:

         Frontiers in 3D Human Interactions 
         Applications of Virtual Reality 
         Distributed Computer-Supported Collaborative Working, CSCW-VR 
         Visualisation in the Biosciences 
         Panel discussion on the Conference Theme of how visualisation 
                could be used to extract knowledge from the data 
         Live Demonstrations of the state of the art of Visualisation, 
                including 3D stereo projection in the auditorium and 
                high speed link to Darmstadt

There will also be an opportunity for poster submissions and a trade 
show.


                          Conference Location

The Conference will take place in the newly completed conference 
facilities at the Wellcome Trust Genome Campus in the grounds of 
Hinxton Hall, Cambridge, UK. 

The campus is the site of The European Bioinformatics Institute, The 
Sanger Centre and the UK MRC Human Genome Mapping Project Resource 
Centre.

The Conference Banquet will take place in the Dining Hall of King's 
College, Cambridge.


                        Conference Registration

The Closing Date for early registration and submission of abstracts is 
10th November, 1997. Late registration will be possible from the 11th 
November, however the registration fee will increase by 50 GBP. 
Registration forms are available at the conference web site:
                      http://www.ebi.ac.uk/fiv97/


Frontiers in Visualisation '97 is supported by the Astra Bioinformatics 
Centre.


Requests for further information and questions should be addressed to 
Chris Jones (Chris.Jones@cern.ch) or Alan J. Robinson (alan@ebi.ac.uk).



--
============================================================
Alan J. Robinson                      Tel:+44-(0)1223 494625
EMBL Outstation                       Fax:+44-(0)1223 494468
European Bioinformatics Institute     Email:  alan@ebi.ac.uk
Wellcome Trust Genome Campus
Hinxton, Cambridge,
CB10 1RQ, UK                