From owner-biotechniques@net.bio.net Wed Oct 11 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: MMCCARTHY@biotechnet.com
Newsgroups: bionet.journals.letters.biotechniques
Subject: Citation Information for BioTechniques Articles
Date: 12 Oct 1995 12:55:31 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 27
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Approved: MMCCARTHY@BIOTECHNET.COM
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <01HWCWOSYI5E8X0JI8@delphi.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

     When you receive your October issue of BioTechniques, check
beneath the title of each article for the complete citation
information (volume number, inclusive page numbers, month and
year of publication) for that article.  This information has been
incorporated into the BioTechniques page format as the result of
a suggestion posted to this newsgroup by Paul Hengen
(pnh@ncifcrf.gov), who pointed out that determining the correct
citation information for BioTechniques articles (especially from
photocopies) can be difficult because all pages in the journal
are not numbered.

     One purpose of the BIOTECHNIQUES newsgroup is to facilitate
rapid communication between readers and the BioTechniques
editorial staff - kind of an electronic "Letters to the Editor".  

(The *primary purpose* of the newsgroup is to enable readers,
authors and all interested individuals to discuss and
troubleshoot the techniques, including general approaches and
specific protocols, that appear monthly in the journal,
BioTechniques.)

So if you have an idea that you think would make BioTechniques
more valuable, interesting or easier to use, post your
suggestions here - we'd like to hear your opinions!

Mary McCarthy  (Moderator)
Associate Editor, BioTechniques

From owner-biotechniques@net.bio.net Tue Oct 17 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: Robert Horton <horton@biosci.cbs.umn.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.journals.letters.biotechniques
Subject: AmpliGrease and PCR Dye FAQ
Date: 18 Oct 1995 09:12:21 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 207
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Approved: MMCCARTHY@BIOTECHNET.COM
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199510172144.QAA18694@biosci.cbs.umn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net


These questions refer to two publications in BioTechniques:

References:

Hoppe, B.L., Conti-Tronconi, B.M. and Horton, R.M. "Gel-loading
dyes compatible with PCR". BioTechniques, 12(5):679-80, 1992.

Horton, R.M., Hoppe, B.L., and Conti-Tronconi, B.M. AmpliGrease:
"Hot-start" PCR using petroleum jelly. BioTechniques
16(1):42-43, 1994.

The first paper describes gel-loading dyes that can be added to
a PCR without interfering with the reaction, and the second
describes the use of ordinary petroleum jelly (Vaseline TM) as a
meltable barrier for hot-start PCR. The hot-start protocol makes
use of the PCR-compatible dye. No, there is no real commercial
product called "AmpliGrease".

: # Since publication, have you made any improvements?

A few small things:

1) Heat the sample block up to denaturation temperature before
you put the samples in. The grease melts at about 50degrees, and
you can get some "cold-start" effect from this first cycle. We
have seen actual examples where reactions came out noticeably
cleaner when starting in a hot block.

2) Don't cycle the reactions too fast. I did some reactions in a
home-made robo-cycler, and it took about 40 cycles to reach the
same yield as 30 cycles in a conventional block-type machine.
The robot cycled the tubes so fast that there was not enough
time for mixing by diffusion.  I suspect that if you included a
long initial soak (maybe even a long 72degree soak) in the first
cycle, you should be able to cycle fast afterwards, but I never
tried it (they made me take my robot apart...)	:(

3) an oven is more convenient for melting the grease than a hot
plate (see below).

: # There is a hot bonnet on the PCR-machine that I use; do I
: still overlay with oil?

I would overlay with oil, for two reasons.

First, the oil protects the itty bitty droplet of top mix from
evaporation, which can be significant even before you put the
tubes in the cycler if you leave the lid open for too long.
Remember, we recommend 10ul total reaction volume, because this
protocol depends on diffusion to mix top and bottom mixes. The
Perkin-Elmer Cetus protocol recommends 100ul volumes because
they use convective mixing. In our protocol, the densities of
the top and bottom mixes are so different it would presumably be
difficult to get good convective mixing. 10ul can evaporate
while you're not looking.

Second, the oil mixes with the Vaseline during cycling, to make
a mixture that stays liquid afterwards. You need to add oil to
2.5 to 3 times the volume of grease to prevent resolidification.
If the grease resolidifies, you have a real mess to deal with in
trying to pipette out your sample. It will really plug up a
pipette tip.

: # Where do you heat the tubes to melt the AmpliGrease?

Most importantly, you do NOT want to use your PCR machine,
because of the potential for contamination. We originally used a
hot plate (just watch the samples to be sure they don't boil!).
Now I use a little oven set at about 70 degrees. I bet a
hairdryer would work, if you can find a real hot one.

: # Can I overlay the samples with heated, fluid AmpliGrease,
: rather than heating it afterwards?

I haven't tried it. If you use warm Vaseline and a large gauge
needle, it is pretty easy to dispense in the "gel" state. If the
room is cold and/or your needle is too small, its difficult. I
did try dispensing liquid wax some time back - boy, that's a
pain (hard to keep melted).

: # Can you please send me a protocol for the production of your
: Cresol Red and Sucrose loading dye, and also where to buy
: them?

We have used Cresol Red from Aldrich and from Sigma, but
we've only tried the free acid (Sigma cat #C-7524). There is
also a salt of cresol red which is more soluble, but I haven't
tried it. With the free acid, we make essentially a saturated
solution of Cresol Red in 60% sucrose. In a 50ml tube, put 30g
sucrose and ~20 mg cresol red. Mix well (preferably, let it
tumble for a while.). Sterile filter, aliquot, and freeze for
long-term storage (we aliquot all PCR reagents for purposes of
contamination control). The solution is actually so hypertonic
that we've never seen anything grow in it, even at room temp for
several months, but its probably best to keep the working
aliquot in the refrigerator, and stocks in the freezer.

In my most recent batch of loading dye, I used Sigma Ultra-grade
sucrose (cat #S-7903). I suspect that if one were studying plant
genes, especially sugar beets or cane, one might want to be more
careful in the choice of sucrose, but we have never been able to
attribute a band to the sucrose. (I have, however, cloned E.
coli genes from "mammalian cDNA". Presumably this is because the
enzymes used, RT, Taq, etc., are recombinant and are generally
contaminated with some amount of bug DNA.)

: # Where at the supermarket do I ask for Regular or Molecular
: Grade Vaseline?

Unfortunately, you still need to do your own quality control on
Vaseline at this point in time. Practically, this means you just
need to try it and see if it works. Just be aware that not all
batches of Vaseline are suitable for use in PCR. As mentioned in
the paper, we found one jar which gave sporadic results, as if
an inhibitor were present, but not mixed in very well. Four or
five other jars have worked flawlessly. If you could get
Molecular Grade Vaseline, I'm sure it would cost 100 times as
much.    :)

Other points: It has recently come to my attention that another
group published the use of tartrazine (yellow food coloring,
FD&C #5) as a PCR-compatible loading dye before we did (Wittwer,
C.T., and Garling, D.J, Rapid cycle DNA amplification: time and
temperature optimization. BioTechniques 10(1):76-83, 1991). It
was a real twilight-zone experience for me to see this for
several reasons:

1) they used one of the same dyes

2) they published in the same journal

3) Dr. Wittwer's works on rapid-cycle PCR are among my all-time
favorite PCR papers.

There is no doubt I read Dr. Wittwer's paper when it first
appeared. Perhaps it started me thinking about coloring PCRs.
When Bobbi Hoppe approached me about doing an undergraduate
research project, I had this project in the back of my mind. I
went to the store and bought a pack of food colors. Only yellow
worked. I'm sure that's what Dr. Wittwer's group did, too.
Before we submitted this paper, we looked high and low for
earlier work, and did not find anything. I had by then
completely forgotten that Wittwer's group had mentioned it in
their rapid-cycling paper, and it did not occur to me to look
there. There is no doubt we should have referenced them; as far
as I know, theirs is the first report of using dyes to color
PCRs (but then, I've been known to miss such things).

If anyone knows of other works in this area that I have missed,
I would appreciate having them brought to my attention (normal
Medline searches don't bring up much).

Idaho Technologies, the manufacturers of the commercial version
of the hot-air rapid PCR cycler, now recommend the use of
sucrose and cresol red (see the e-journal "The Rapid Cyclist" at
http://128.110.195.115/ for protocols).

There is a PCR-compatible red dye in Redivue radiolabeled
nucleotides (Amersham). It is very intense, and is definitely
not cresol red, as judged by differences in migration and the
fact that it doesn't turn yellow at pH 7. It is PCR-compatible.
Amersham won't say what it is, though (I called 'em).

There is a commercially available PCR-compatible gel-loading dye
called RediLoad, advertised (where else?) in BioTechniques. The
supplier is Research Genetics, Inc., Huntsville, AL, home page:
http://www.resgen.com/, FAX: 205-536-9016. They charge $77 for
enough to do 1000 one hundred microliter reactions. I don't know
what the dye is, but I'd guess it might be the same as
Amersham's Redivue dye (judging from the color in the photo and
its gel migration).

You can get good at pipetting a small sample from beneath oil
(even the thicker grease/oil mix that results from AmpliGrease
hot starts), but it takes practice. A few years back, it seemed
like you couldn't open an issue of BioTechniques without seeing
yet another method for removing the blasted oil from a PCR - I
think it has frustrated quite a few people. A few hints: - Watch
out for bubbles in which your sample is enveloped in a skin of
oil. They can float out of the well and burst on the surface,
spreading your sample far and wide. With practice, you can pop
these bubbles against the side of the well as they start to
form. Oil floating to the top without your sample is no big
deal. Smooth, fairly rapid sample application will help prevent
more bubbles from forming as you load. - When you're trying to
fish out that itty bitty droplet of reaction volume from
underneath the oil, rest your hands on some solid support. Use
spare fingers from the hand holding the tube to steady the
pipette tip. This is a delicate operation; steadying the tip
with your other hand is not cheating! - Practice a few times
before you give up and resort to trying to remove the oil!
You'll probably get the hang of it.

I thank from Dr. Steffano Loffrede (Division of Gastroenterology,
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine) for stimulating questions.

Comments or questions regarding this posting should be directed
to: horton@biosci.cbs.umn.edu



Robert M. Horton (PhD!) /\ "Crash programs fail because of the theory that
U of M Dermatology Dept || with nine women pregnant you get a baby a month"
Box 98 UMHC, 4-154 PWB /||\ -W. von Braun.   Disclaimer: "Bob who?"
Minneapolis, MN 55455   ^^   horton@biosci.cbs.umn.edu       (612)625-8941


From owner-biotechniques@net.bio.net Thu Oct 19 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: BIOSCI Administrator <biohelp@net.bio.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.journals.letters.biotechniques
Subject: IMPORTANT: BIOSCI miniFAQ
Date: 20 Oct 1995 06:20:27 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 196
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Approved: MMCCARTHY@BIOTECHNET.COM
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199510200900.CAA29679@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net


This is a new "miniFAQ" designed to answer the questions that come up
the *most frequently*.  The main BIOSCI FAQ (Frequently Asked
Questions) is accessible on the World Wide Web at URL
http://www.bio.net/.

	Contents:
	--------
	1) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.

	2) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.

	3) How to access BIOSCI/bionet newsgroup archives.

	4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.


1) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.
-------------------------------------------------------
BIOSCI is a set of parallel USENET newsgroups (the "bionet" groups)
and mailing lists.  The same postings are distributed on both media
(except for a small number of mailing-list-only groups at
net.bio.net).  Unfortunately it is becoming a despicable practice on
the Internet (by a few people out to make a fast buck) to do automated
mass postings to thousands of newsgroups and mailing lists.  These
attempts to grab free advertising are refered to as "spams" in the
usual, somewhat boneheaded, net terminology.  USENET is more
susceptible to this practice, and many spams originate on the USENET
groups and then are passed on to the mailing lists.  However, spammers
also get lists of mailing addresses and hit these too, so neither
medium is immune.

What should you do personally if you get junk mail?
---------------------------------------------------
Just delete it and move on without reading it further.  Filing a
protest is becoming increasingly useless because spammers are often
disguising the addresses where the messages are sent from.  Unless you
really understand Internet mail systems, your attempt at protest by
sending replies to the message will often end up being sent to the
address of an innocent person that the spammer is victimizing.

What can BIOSCI/bionet do to protect its newsgroups?
----------------------------------------------------
The only solution currently available is to moderate the newsgroup.
If this newsgroup is already moderated, then you are in good shape.
Moderation protects the newsgroups from about 95% of the spams that
are being sent to date.  This means that someone has to take the time
to review each message before it goes out.  We have set up software
here that simply allows the moderator to forward to an address at
net.bio.net messages that (s)he wishes to have distributed.  This
takes no more time than that needed to read the message and pass it
on, say about 1 min. per message.

Most newsgroups currently have a discussion leader who is responsible
for their newsgroup.  The discussions leaders and their e-mail
addresses are listed in the BIOSCI Information Sheet which is
available on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  If a newsgroup is being
hit with too many junk postings, please contact the discussion leader
for that group and see if there is interest in moderating the group.
Please do not assume that by simply posting a complaint to the
newsgroup itself, anyone on the BIOSCI staff will act on your
complaint.  With close to 100 newsgroups to run, the BIOSCI staff has
to rely on the discussion leaders of each newsgroup to report problems
directly to us at biosci-help@net.bio.net.

We will moderate any of our newsgroups if the discussion leader tells
us that the readership of the group wishes to do so and if a moderator
is willing to do the work.  For most BIOSCI/bionet groups, this
entails only a few minutes of work each day.

Moderating a newsgroup will resolve probably 95% of the junk postings.
Unfortunately there are easy ways for determined spammers to override
the moderation mechanism.  We are working on new systems to provide
access to our newsgroups over the WWW.  These should be available
soon, probably November 1995, and will allow you to use your Web
browser to look at the news postings.  While this will not stop
spammers from trying to post to the groups, this will give you yet
another way, besides using USENET news, to keep the junk out of your
personal mail files.


2) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.
------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE NOTE: The BIOSCI management does NOT act on
subscription/unsubscription requests that are posted improperly to the
newsgroups and mailing lists.  People who do this only bother everyone
on the lists to no avail.  Please be sure to follow the proper
procedures below.

Gory details are in the BIOSCI Information sheets on the Web at
http://www.bio.net.  Below we give an example utilizing the
METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list at both of our two BIOSCI sites:

Users in the Americas and Pacific Rim countries who use the BIOSCI
------------------------------------------------------------------
node at computer net.bio.net:
----------------------------

A) Determine the "listname" which is the <=8 character mail address
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   for the group.  These can be found in the BIOSCI Info. Sheet.  For
   the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS group the mailing address is
   methods@net.bio.net.  The listname is the portion of the address to
   the left of the @ sign, i.e., "methods".  The listname is used with
   the "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" commands illustrated below.

B) Mail all commands in the body of a mail message addressed to
   biosci-server@net.bio.net.  Do NOT send commands to the newsgroup
   posting addresses!  Leave the Subject: line blank, any text on it
   will be ignored.

C) In the body of your message put one or more of the following
   commands with an "end" command on the last line, e.g.,

   subscribe methods
   unsubscribe methods
   end

   Do NOT put your e-mail address or other text on these lines.  The
   server only allows you to cancel your subscription if the address
   on your mail header matches the address on our mailing list.
   Please ask for help at biosci-help@net.bio.net if your address has
   changed, e.g., if you know you are on the list but the server tells
   you that you are not a member.


Users in Europe, Africa, and Central Asia who use the BIOSCI node at
--------------------------------------------------------------------
computer daresbury.ac.uk (also known as dl.ac.uk):
-------------------------------------------------

To subscribe and unsubscribe to/from the BIOSCI lists, you need to
specify the full USENET newsgroup name with "bionet-news." prepended.
The USENET newsgroup names are listed in the BIOSCI Information sheet
on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  For the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list
the USENET newsgroup name is bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts, thus the
appropriate commands are

    sub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

    unsub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

These commands are included in a message addressed to mxt@dl.ac.uk,
NOT to the newsgroup mailing addresses.  As usual, include the text in
the body of the message as text on the Subject: line is ignored.

To unsubscribe from all the lists at the UK node, use

    unsub bionet-news

Please note that if the address in the list is different than the one
in your mail message header, you will not be able to unsubscribe by
this method. If you have problems, please mail biosci@daresbury.ac.uk.


3) How to access BIOSCI/bionet newsgroup archives.
--------------------------------------------------
Back postings of all BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups can be found on the
World Wide Web at URL http://www.bio.net/.  There are several
searchable newsgroup indices at this site.  E-mail users can search
the BIOSCI archives by using our waismail e-mail server.  For
instructions send the message

help

to waismail@net.bio.net.  Leave the Subject: line blank (anything
entered on the Subject: line is ignored).


4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Please take this opportunity to add your name, address, and research
interest information to the BIOSCI User Address Database if you have
not already done so.

You can fill out the address form directly through our Web page at URL
http://www.bio.net/adrform.html.

The address database is reindexed nightly for WWW access (the URL is
http://www.bio.net/).  If you are not directly on the Internet but can
reach it by e-mail, please use our waismail server to access the user
directory.  waismail use is described above.  You can also request a
user address form by e-mail from biosci-help@net.bio.net.

Please check your database entry from time-to-time to see if your
address information is still up-to-date.  Because of our limited
personnel resources, we ask that you resubmit a *complete* form to
revise your entry; we only replace complete entries and do not have
resources to edit old forms.

				Sincerely,

				Dave Kristofferson
				BIOSCI/bionet Manager

				biosci-help@net.bio.net

