From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Sat Nov 01 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!newsfeed.internetmci.com!152.163.199.19!portc03.blue.aol.com!audrey01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: dwhite9096@aol.com (DWhite9096)
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: Chromosome numbers
Date: 2 Nov 1997 05:12:48 GMT
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <19971102051201.AAA27829@ladder01.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder01.news.aol.com
X-Admin: news@aol.com
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com

I'm working on a genetics project for The Waksman Student Scholars program, and
 i'm having lots of trouble finding the number of chromosomes in such organisms
 as E.Coli bacteria, yeast, dog, onion, etc. Does anyone know of a page that
 would list them?...please let me know, thanks
                                                                          
       SuperDorothy


From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Sun Nov 02 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!not-for-mail
From: zhaojk@prairienet.org (Zhao Jiankang)
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: Human gender control
Date: 3 Nov 1997 11:50:29 GMT
Organization: Prairienet
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <63kdq5$rv3$1@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bluestem.prairienet.org
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]

Hi.  Dear friends.  Can we artificially control the gender of human 
being?  I am concerned about this matter because I want to have a boy.  
If the answer is yes, please also tell me how, OK?  Thank you very much.
-- 


From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Mon Nov 03 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news-in-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!194.59.190.100!newsfeed.ecrc.net!news.space.net!news.klaus-datentechnik.de!news
From: "Daniel Pikarski" <Daniel.Pikarski@kdt.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: human genome
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 12:17:25 +0100
Organization: Klaus Datentechnik GmbH
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <63n1gk$6ri@news.klaus-datentechnik.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: modem09.kdt.de
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1008.3
X-MimeOle: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE Engine V4.71.1008.3

 I am searching for everything man knows about the human genes !

PLEASE HELP ME !





From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Fri Nov 07 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!USERS.AFRICAONLINE.CO.KE!wellcome
From: wellcome@USERS.AFRICAONLINE.CO.KE ("Wellcome Trust, Nairobi.")
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: Long primers for PCR
Date: 8 Nov 1997 05:39:56 -0800
Organization: Wellcome Trust Research Laboratories
Lines: 17
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <346501EB.72EF@users.AfricaOnline.Co.Ke>
Reply-To: wellcome@users.africaonline.co.ke
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Dear Colleagues,

If there any risk of amplifying a fragment DNA with primer which are 50
to 60 pb. Actually, I want to introduce a enzyme restriction site in
these primers so that I can easily  detected them in agore or Acrylamide
gel. Therefore I do need longer primers. But I wandering about doing a
PCR such long oligonucleotides.
My regards,

-- 
Wellcome Trust Research Labs, 
PO Box 43640,
Nairobi, Kenya.
Tel 254 (2) 725390, Fax 254 (2) 711673
E-mail: wellcome@users.africaonline.co.ke



From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Sat Nov 08 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!207.206.0.75!streamer1.cleveland.iagnet.net!iagnet.net!news-w.ans.net!dahlia.singnet.com.sg!columbine.singnet.com.sg!news.swiftech.com.sg!p-09-06.swiftech.com.sg
From: "Wendy Ng " <ydnew@mbox2.singnet.com.sg>
Newsgroups: alt.teens,alt.philosophy.taoism,alt.philosophy.zen,bionet.mycology,bionet.neuroscience,bionet.parasitology,bionet.plants,bionet.genome.chromosomes,bionet.microbiology,alt.flame.niggers,alt.nswpp,alt.poltics.white-power,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads,alt.pa
Subject: Re: Please help me in this regard.
Date: 9 Nov 97 14:54:04 GMT
Organization: ..
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <01bced1f$a6a791a0$86497fcb@default>
References: <01bcc8c3$3ebd42e0$e3e92399@itjfvkli> <60bl1n$5lp$1@netty.york.ac.uk> <Pine.OSF.3.93.971023075136.13685E-100000@crab.jcu.edu.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.swiftech.com.sg
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161
Xref: biosci bionet.mycology:6880 bionet.neuroscience:20692 bionet.parasitology:2948 bionet.plants:17120 bionet.genome.chromosomes:1904 bionet.microbiology:11564

VERY VERY VERY VERY UNLIKELY!!!!

Kaih Bomai <bmh-kbb@jcu.edu.au> wrote in article
<Pine.OSF.3.93.971023075136.13685E-100000@crab.jcu.edu.au>...
> 
> I am  student and that I need to know at the current rate of
> inter-marriage that is going  on in the world - is it possible that in
> some time in the future.....will they be ever a particular human with
same
> genotype.
> Please help
> 
> 
> 

From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Sat Nov 08 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!207.206.0.75!streamer1.cleveland.iagnet.net!iagnet.net!news-w.ans.net!dahlia.singnet.com.sg!columbine.singnet.com.sg!news.swiftech.com.sg!p-09-06.swiftech.com.sg
From: "Sze Toh Khai Munn" <stkm001@swiftech.com.sg>
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: Re: Human gender control
Date: 9 Nov 97 15:01:45 GMT
Organization: ..
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <01bced20$b96d0f80$86497fcb@default>
References: <63kdq5$rv3$1@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.swiftech.com.sg
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161

There is a possibility of choosing the sex of your child, if that's what
you mean. This is done by selecting or separating the X and Y chromosomes
from the sperm. I think this subject is still very new but it has already
been reported in cattle and such. Not to mention expensive. I don't think
that they have approved it on humans though. Anybody correct me if I'm
wrong. Thanks.

Zhao Jiankang <zhaojk@prairienet.org> wrote in article
<63kdq5$rv3$1@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>...
> Hi.  Dear friends.  Can we artificially control the gender of human 
> being?  I am concerned about this matter because I want to have a boy.  
> If the answer is yes, please also tell me how, OK?  Thank you very much.
> -- 
> 
> 

From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Sat Nov 08 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.nacamar.de!uni-erlangen.de!winx03!news
From: s88891@stud-mail.uni-wuerzburg.de (Mathias Holpert)
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: Re: Long primers for PCR
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 1997 19:53:35 GMT
Organization: University of Wuerzburg, Germany
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <34660d04.7035125@news.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
References: <346501EB.72EF@users.AfricaOnline.Co.Ke>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wex142.extern.uni-wuerzburg.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451

On 8 Nov 1997 05:39:56 -0800, wellcome@USERS.AFRICAONLINE.CO.KE
("Wellcome Trust, Nairobi.") wrote:

>Dear Colleagues,
>
>If there any risk of amplifying a fragment DNA with primer which are 50
>to 60 pb. Actually, I want to introduce a enzyme restriction site in
>these primers so that I can easily  detected them in agore or Acrylamide
>gel. Therefore I do need longer primers. But I wandering about doing a
>PCR such long oligonucleotides.
>My regards,

Generally, it is possible to work with primers as long as those you
intend to use. I have used primers longer than that to introduce
specific mutations into my plasmid and they worked me. But the longer
the primer, the more likely it is to form weird secondary structures
or primer-dimers. You may want to play with your PCR conditions- but
is definitely possible.

Good luck

Mathias

P.S.: Are you sure that your primers need to be this long if you just
want to introduce a new restriction site?

From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Sat Nov 08 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!ais.net!news.idt.net!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!news.demon.co.uk!demon!bebbo.demon.co.uk!dene
From: Dene Bebbington <dene@bebbo.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.teens,alt.philosophy.taoism,alt.philosophy.zen,bionet.mycology,bionet.neuroscience,bionet.parasitology,bionet.plants,bionet.genome.chromosomes,bionet.microbiology,alt.flame.niggers,alt.nswpp,alt.poltics.white-power,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads,alt.pa
Subject: Re: Please help me in this regard.
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 18:12:22 +0000
Organization: Deno's Domicile
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <smOks1AG0fZ0EwXv@bebbo.demon.co.uk>
References: <01bcc8c3$3ebd42e0$e3e92399@itjfvkli>
 <60bl1n$5lp$1@netty.york.ac.uk>
 <Pine.OSF.3.93.971023075136.13685E-100000@crab.jcu.edu.au>
 <01bced1f$a6a791a0$86497fcb@default>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bebbo.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: bebbo.demon.co.uk [194.222.67.195]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: Turnpike Version 3.01 <A3St8wqhVH52zMa$n4Px$j$nWF>
Lines: 20
Xref: biosci bionet.mycology:6882 bionet.neuroscience:20693 bionet.parasitology:2949 bionet.plants:17122 bionet.genome.chromosomes:1907 bionet.microbiology:11569

Wendy Ng <ydnew@mbox2.singnet.com.sg> wrote:
>VERY VERY VERY VERY UNLIKELY!!!!
>
>Kaih Bomai <bmh-kbb@jcu.edu.au> wrote in article
><Pine.OSF.3.93.971023075136.13685E-100000@crab.jcu.edu.au>...
>> 
>> I am  student and that I need to know at the current rate of
>> inter-marriage that is going  on in the world - is it possible that in
>> some time in the future.....will they be ever a particular human with
>same
>> genotype.

They are commonly known as twins. Do you know what a genotype is?

-- 
Dene Bebbington                    http://www.bebbo.demon.co.uk

"Beside the braes of dawn. One clear new morning. Down where the lilies
stood in bloom. I knew that I was just a stranger in this world. A wind
just passing through." - Calum & Rory Macdonald (Runrig)

From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Sun Nov 09 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!193.174.75.126!news-was.dfn.de!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!news.ruhr-uni-bochum.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!not-for-mail
From: Andreas John <aj@ithe.rwth-aachen.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: Reading out DNA
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 10:19:23 +0100
Organization: Aachen University of Technology / Rechnerbetrieb Informatik
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <3466D19B.41C67EA6@ithe.rwth-aachen.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fritz.ithe.rwth-aachen.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.2 sun4c)
CC: aj@ithe.rwth-aachen.de

Hallo!

Could anyone please explain to someone who is not an expert in
this field how the information stored in the DNA sequences of
the various chromosomes is read out/interpreted during the
growth of a creature? Is it similar to what can be done in
mathematics with Iterated Function Theory, where complex structures
are created by iterative application of a finite set of rules
(= finite number of bases in DNA)?

Please email to aj@ithe.rwth-aachen.de

Andreas John

From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Sun Nov 09 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!4.1.16.34!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!nih.gov!NewsWatcher!user
From: jcz@nchgr.nih.gov (Jean C. Zenklusen)
Newsgroups: alt.teens,alt.philosophy.taoism,alt.philosophy.zen,bionet.mycology,bionet.neuroscience,bionet.parasitology,bionet.plants,bionet.genome.chromosomes,bionet.microbiology,alt.flame.niggers,alt.nswpp,alt.poltics.white-power,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads,alt.pa
Subject: Re: Please help me in this regard.
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 08:46:42 -0500
Organization: NIH - NCHGR
Lines: 38
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <jcz-1011970846430001@165.112.238.32>
References: <01bcc8c3$3ebd42e0$e3e92399@itjfvkli> <60bl1n$5lp$1@netty.york.ac.uk> <Pine.OSF.3.93.971023075136.13685E-100000@crab.jcu.edu.au> <01bced1f$a6a791a0$86497fcb@default> <smOks1AG0fZ0EwXv@bebbo.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 165.112.238.32
Xref: biosci bionet.mycology:6885 bionet.neuroscience:20695 bionet.parasitology:2950 bionet.plants:17127 bionet.genome.chromosomes:1909 bionet.microbiology:11575

In article <smOks1AG0fZ0EwXv@bebbo.demon.co.uk>, Dene Bebbington
<dene@bebbo.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> >Kaih Bomai <bmh-kbb@jcu.edu.au> wrote in article
> ><Pine.OSF.3.93.971023075136.13685E-100000@crab.jcu.edu.au>...
> >> 
> >> I am  student and that I need to know at the current rate of
> >> inter-marriage that is going  on in the world - is it possible that in
> >> some time in the future.....will they be ever a particular human with
> >same
> >> genotype.
> 
> They are commonly known as twins. Do you know what a genotype is?
> 
> -- 
> Dene Bebbington                    http://www.bebbo.demon.co.uk
> 
> "Beside the braes of dawn. One clear new morning. Down where the lilies
> stood in bloom. I knew that I was just a stranger in this world. A wind
> just passing through." - Calum & Rory Macdonald (Runrig)

Sorry, but no. They are known as "identical" twins. Only monozygous twins
have exactly the same allellic variance for all their genes (at least at
birth, mutations can occur later in life changing their genotype).
Non-identical twins (dizygotes, comming from two eggs) share as much
genotype with each other as any pair of siblings.

-- 
Dr. Jean C, Zenklusen, M.S., Ph.D.
National Institutes of Health
National Center for Human Genome Research
Building 49, Room 2C28
49 Convent Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892
E-mail:jcz@nchgr.nih.gov

"Science has explained nothing: the more we know the profounder is the surrounding darkness"
A. Huxley

From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Sun Nov 09 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!rutgers!nntp.upenn.edu!dsinc!news.voicenet.com!news.idt.net!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.algonet.se!uni-erlangen.de!winx03!news
From: s88891@stud-mail.uni-wuerzburg.de (Mathias Holpert)
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: Re: Please help me in this regard.
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 20:26:04 GMT
Organization: University of Wuerzburg, Germany
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <34676777.13831759@news.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
References: <01bcc8c3$3ebd42e0$e3e92399@itjfvkli> <60bl1n$5lp$1@netty.york.ac.uk> <Pine.OSF.3.93.971023075136.13685E-100000@crab.jcu.edu.au> <01bced1f$a6a791a0$86497fcb@default> <smOks1AG0fZ0EwXv@bebbo.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wex141.extern.uni-wuerzburg.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451

On Sun, 9 Nov 1997 18:12:22 +0000, Dene Bebbington
<dene@bebbo.demon.co.uk> wrote:


>>
>>Kaih Bomai <bmh-kbb@jcu.edu.au> wrote in article
>><Pine.OSF.3.93.971023075136.13685E-100000@crab.jcu.edu.au>...
>>> 
>>> I am  student and that I need to know at the current rate of
>>> inter-marriage that is going  on in the world - is it possible that in
>>> some time in the future.....will they be ever a particular human with
>>same
>>> genotype.
>
>They are commonly known as twins. Do you know what a genotype is?

What do twins have to do with the current rate of inter-marriage, and
thus, with the original question?

Ciao

Mathias

From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Mon Nov 10 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uninett.no!news-stkh.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!newsfeed1.funet.fi!news2.funet.fi!news.funet.fi!news.helsinki.fi!biotek80.pc.helsinki.fi!roos
From: roos@operoni.helsinki.fi (Christophe Roos)
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: Re: Reading out DNA
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 08:16:15
Organization: Institute of Biotechnology
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <roos.291.0008459D@operoni.helsinki.fi>
References: <3466D19B.41C67EA6@ithe.rwth-aachen.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: biotek80.pc.helsinki.fi
X-Trace: oravannahka.Helsinki.FI 879228925 24808 (None) 128.214.165.67
X-Complaints-To: usenet@oravannahka.Helsinki.FI
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]


> Could anyone please explain to someone who is not an expert in this
> field how the information stored in the DNA sequences of the various
> chromosomes is read out/interpreted during the growth of a creature?

The chromosomes can be considered as very long strings of four letters
(to know more about genome sequencing projects, go to the URL
http://www.ornl.gov/TechResources/Human_Genome/genetics.html#organism).
The four letter code (ACGT) is read in groups of three (triplets), each
triplet being "translated" into one given amino acid. 64 different
triplets can be achieved, about three of them meaning "stop" in the
translational stage (depending on the organism and organelle under
consideration). The rest of them code for about 20 different amino
acids, meaning that several triplets have the same translation. The
amino acids (peptides) form linear chains. Once a chain (polypeptide) is
complete, it will fold into a complex three-dimensional structure, that
will give the polypeptide (protein) its function. In brief, the linear
4-letter code of the genes (discrete segments of the chromosomes) is
translated into proteins that will adopt 3-dimensional structures given 
by their amino acid sequence/order. A complex interplay of proteins and 
many other molecules as well as environmental factors will eventually 
lead to the formation of an organism.

You can view the genome (the set of all chromosomes in one cell of an
organism) as a manual or book of instructions how to make a cell (in a
community if you consider a multicellular organism).

> Is it similar to what can be done in mathematics with Iterated
> Function Theory, where complex structures are created by iterative
> application of a finite set of rules (= finite number of bases in
> DNA)? 

Partially yes, partially no. With regards to the above comparison of
the genome to a book of instructions, it is clearly an
oversimplification to say that the instructions can be viewed as a set
of iterations performed on the alphabet... The finite "set of rules" is
on a higher complexity level than the four bases (alphabet): it is
probably more apropriate to view the different modules (domains) of the
proteins as the unitary blocks (maybe the sentences in the book could
be used for the iterative process).

Historically, one interest of mathematicians for genetics lie in 
the view that all the complexity of living organisms lie in the four 
letter code. However, one remarkable difference introduced by biological 
systems is the lack of unitary "rules" at some level from DNA sequence 
to complex organisms.


ChR

_________________________________________________________________________
Christophe Roos            Dr.Sc., doc.   |   Institute of  Biotechnology
                                          |   &  Dept. of Biosciences
Phone:                 +358 9 7085 9367   |   Division   of  Genetics
Fax:                   +358 9 7085 9366   |   P.O.Box 56, Viksbaagen 9
E-mail:     Christophe.Roos@Helsinki.FI   |   FIN-00014 Univ. of Helsinki
X-400:    /G=Christophe/S=Roos/O=Helsinki/ADMD=fumail/C=Fi        Finland
<A HREF="http://www.helsinki.fi/~roos/index.html">WWW Home Page: Roos</A>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Mon Nov 10 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!mark.ucdavis.edu!awabi.library.ucla.edu!208.134.241.18!newsfeed.internetmci.com!192.87.106.104!surfnet.nl!newshost.vu.nl!not-for-mail
From: Marisol Rodriguez Pena <pena@chem.vu.nl>
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: Re: Human gender control
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 18:05:24 +0000
Organization: Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <34689E64.7A6D@chem.vu.nl>
References: <63kdq5$rv3$1@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <01bced20$b96d0f80$86497fcb@default>
NNTP-Posting-Host: macdyn144.chem.vu.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Macintosh; I; 68K)

Sex selection in humans has been carried out succesfully a couple of 
years ago in Madrid, Spain in a woman who carried the Haemofilia gene 
and so she did not want to have male kids (50% risk of been 
haemophylic). After the procedure she had two healthy girls!.
I must point out that this procedure SOULD NOT BE indicated to choose 
the sex of you kid in healthy families. I do not know if there is 
legislation any way...

Greatings


MS Rodriguez Pena 
-- 
MS Rodriguez Pena, MD, phD
Department of Pharmacochemistry, Faculteit der Scheikunde
Vrije Universiteit. 
De Boelelaan 1083,
1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: 31-20-4447572
Fax: 31-20-4447610

From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Thu Nov 20 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!rutgers!nntp.upenn.edu!dsinc!news.voicenet.com!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news-dc-2.sprintlink.net!news-east.sprintlink.net!news-dc-26.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!worldnet.att.net!news.u.washington.edu!roach
From: roach@u.washington.edu (Jared Roach)
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: How much of the human genome has been sequenced.
Date: 21 Nov 1997 00:09:04 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <652jf0$fal$1@nntp3.u.washington.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: saul2.u.washington.edu
X-Trace: nntp3.u.washington.edu 880070944 15701 (None) 140.142.64.2
X-Complaints-To: help@cac.washington.edu
NNTP-Posting-User: roach

Hello all,
	I have updated my "How much of the human genome has been sequenced?" 
web page. I calculate that we have sequenced 2.68% of the human genome as 
of November 18, 1997.
	My page is at:
http://weber.u.washington.edu/~roach/human_genome_progress2.html

Best Wishes,
	Jared

	
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jared C. Roach
Department of Molecular Biotechnology
Health Sciences Building, Room K354
University of Washington
Box 357730
Seattle, WA 98195
phone  (206) 616-4536
FAX    (206) 685-7301
roach@u.washington.edu
http://weber.u.washington.edu/~roach/



From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Sat Nov 22 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov!cpk-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news-in-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!199.227.0.16!news.gate.net!not-for-mail
From: "TEKTRON-1" <news@gate.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: CLO2 Exposer
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 03:20:39 -0500
Organization: CyberGate, Inc.
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <658otd$1qcc$1@news.gate.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: brnga2-5.gate.net
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3

I was Exposed to CLO2 and other chemicals that may be formed in a 3rd stage
D-2 Bleaching tower process,  I was working on the top clearing away pulp
material from the gear box and had to get on my knees to see under the gear
box, this was all done to prepare it for painting,the floor was a grating
floor and there was some kind of purge or vent pip under me, and at the
level I was working the gas was much stronger than when standing, I could
taste the chemicals, and complained to employees of the contractor and Stone
Container personnel, They all said not to worry it was harmless, it burnt my
eyes, mouth, throat, nose, and made my teeth feel like chalk.
After my second day on the job I was hospitalized for three days. I now have
Lung damage,seizures,sleeping disorder, chemical sensitivity, depression,and
more.
I never had any of these problems before and no history to assume this, but
still Stone is saying they were already there, I just think that they must
say this on all injure cases to try to protect them selves. But I would like
to get a history on Stone Container injures,and also how many people have
had seizures from exposure to these chemicals because Stone's tox. expert is
saying that the chemicals could not cause seizures and has also stated that
I have had all these problems before with out any proof, I thought that an
expert would use an expert process to form an opinion and get a history on
me before giving such a invalid opinion, please help me on this.
Thanks.



From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Sun Nov 23 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov!cpk-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!newsfeed.wli.net!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.ssi1.com!uunet!not-for-mail
From: Binesh Bannerjee <binesh@hex21.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes,sci.bio.technology
Subject: Length of Human DNA.
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 21:05:41 -0500
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <3478E0F5.D2A48114@hex21.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: jolt.hex21.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en] (WinNT; I)

I realize this may be an idiotic, naive question, so if there is an FAQ
somewhere, please let me know...
Looked in rtfm didn't find it...

Anyhow, I have two questions (just out of curiosity...)

I'm not sure if I remember this correctly from way long ago...
How many nucleotides are in human DNA?
And, is the number of nucleotides in human DNA constant across humans
(let's say barring gender differences)...

Like is it males have 6 billion 583 million 743 thousand 542 base pairs,
and
           females have 6 billion 672 million 243 thousand 938 base
pairs?

Is that number close? 6 billion? Or are there much more or much less?
I read in a book that there were 200,000 genes in human DNA, and it said
1000
nucleotides per gene, which has to be an approximation, right? Since 3
nucleotides
gives you an amino acid, wouldn't the number of nucleotides in a gene
have to be evenly divisible by 3?

But by that calculation, 200 million base pairs approximately in a human
DNA?

How do we know that introns are non functional? Introns exist within a
gene, right?
Not junk outside of start and stop codons, right?

Any answers appreciated...
Including, well, if you want to know, go take a molecular bio course!
Stop pestering us
with such trivial questions! It's not something we can explain in a 50
line response!

(I'm just a lowly Unix programmer, trying to understand things...)

Binesh Bannerjee


From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Sun Nov 23 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!usenet
From: bbruner@uclink4.berkeley.edu (Bob Bruner)
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes,sci.bio.technology
Subject: Re: Length of Human DNA.
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 02:32:23 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 78
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <3478e660.23941642@agate.berkeley.edu>
References: <3478E0F5.D2A48114@hex21.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbruner.hip.berkeley.edu
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/16.230

On Sun, 23 Nov 1997 21:05:41 -0500, Binesh Bannerjee
<binesh@hex21.com> wrote:
>
>Anyhow, I have two questions (just out of curiosity...)
>
>How many nucleotides are in human DNA?

About 3 billion base pairs.

>And, is the number of nucleotides in human DNA constant across humans
>(let's say barring gender differences)...

Yes. (other than the inevitable minor differences which would occur
due to mutations)

>Is that number close? 6 billion? Or are there much more or much less?

Well, 3 billion base pairs is 6 billion bases. But the "length" is 3
billion.


>I read in a book that there were 200,000 genes in human DNA, and it said
>1000
>nucleotides per gene, which has to be an approximation, right? 

Current estimates are more like 50 to 100,000 genes. But this will be
only an estimate until we learn the complete genome sequence -- in 10
years or so.

Yes, the number of nucleotides per gene is an approximation, based on
some view of the average gene size. And of course, that ignores
non-coding sequences, such as the introns that you mention below.

>Since 3
>nucleotides
>gives you an amino acid, wouldn't the number of nucleotides in a gene
>have to be evenly divisible by 3?

Yes, again referring only to coding regions.


>But by that calculation, 200 million base pairs approximately in a human
>DNA?

You mean 200,000 genes times 1000 nucleotides per gene seems _much_
less than the genome size??? Yes, indeed. A major portion of the
genome is non-coding. This includes the introns, as well as regions
between genes. Some of this serves regulatory purposes, but some
undoubtedly has no real purpose.

For a slow growing organism, such as humans, there is little cost to
maintain unneeded DNA.

>
>How do we know that introns are non functional? 

The intron RNA generally seems to be degraded.

However, this is a generality. In some cases, the intron RNA does have
some special function. Further, the presence of the intron within the
gene may affect gene function. So we should not generalize that
introns are inert.

>Introns exist within a
>gene, right?Not junk outside of start and stop codons, right?

correct.


>Any answers appreciated...
>Including, well, if you want to know, go take a molecular bio course!

Sure, why not!  You do sound rather knowledgeable and interested.  We
do get programmers in Mol Biol courses -- and we need  them. Mol Biol
is quite dependent on computers. But this is also a good place for
questions.

bob

From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Tue Nov 25 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!europa.clark.net!205.252.116.205!howland.erols.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-sea-19.sprintlink.net!news-in-west.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!131.216.1.86!news.nevada.edu!news.tamu.edu!sorghum.tamu.edu!user
From: ahp2343@bioch.tamu.edu (Andrew H Paterson)
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: Postdoctoral Opportunities
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 19:49:16 -0500
Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <ahp2343-2511971949160001@sorghum.tamu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sorghum.tamu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Nov 1997 01:46:44 GMT


POSTDOCTORAL OPPORTUNITIES IN PLANT GENOME ANALYSIS.  
(Paterson lab -- Texas A&M University)

Up to six postdoctoral positions (most are new) are available in areas
listed below. The successful candidates will develop and apply new
molecular methods to crop plant genomes, using extensive databases of
prior information (cf. GENETICS 138:499, 138:829, 141:391; PNAS 92:6127;
SCIENCE, 269:1714; NATURE GENETICS 14:380), and existing high-density maps
and YAC/BAC libraries. Outstanding candidates are sought for the following
projects:

(1) Molecular cloning of genes associated with domestication of the cereal
crops.  Specific targets include Sh-1, which regulates the "shattering" of
the mature cereal inflorescence, and Ma-1 which regulates the
short-daylength requirement of many tropical grasses for the initiation of
flowering.  Each has been fine-mapped to small chromosomal intervals using
a detailed RFLP map (about 2,000 loci), and chromosome walking has been
initiated in a 6.5x BAC library.

(2) Fine mapping and molecular cloning of plant genes conferring apomixis
(asexual seed production).  This work benefits from one of the most
simply-inherited and best characterized apomixis systems known, in a
Pennisetum  taxon that has a modest genome size and high level of DNA
polymorphism.  The work also benefits from an extensive body of
comparative data to other small genome grasses, for which BACs are already
in hand, and with established collaboration with a leading forage
Pennisetum breeder (M. A. Hussey).

(3) Fine mapping and molecular cloning of plant genes conferring insect
resistance.  This work will benefit from established map positions for
several genes conferring resistance to the sorghum greenbug (Schizaphis
graminum), as well as a detailed molecular map (about 2,000 RFLP loci) and
6.5x-genome BAC library.  Finally, the work benefits from an active and
productive collaboration with a leading sorghum entomologist (G. L.
Teetes).

(4) Unified molecular mapping of higher plant genomes.  Development and
implementation of new technologies for identifying conservation of gene
order across large evolutionary distances (such as across different
taxonomic families).

(5) Identification of genes that are expressed specifically in particular
plant organs, and in response to specific developmental cues.   Specific
targets include genes that are expressed predominantly in rhizomes
(underground stems), and genes that are transcriptionally regulated in
coordination with the vegetative-reproductive transition of grasses.

(6) Molecular characterization of primary and secondary gene pools, and
advanced-backcross QTL introgression in cotton.  This work will use a
well-established cotton map and microsatellite primers, and is in
collaboration with several leading cotton breeders.

QUALIFICATIONS: Ph.D. in genetics, molecular biology, microbiology, or
allied field, a high level of professional motivation, strong oral and
written communication in English, and good interpersonal skills ("team
players").  Applicants are especially sought who have experience in
analysis of large genomic DNAs, and/or analysis of transcriptional
regulation of gene expression. Salary commensurate with experience,
competitive benefits. 

TO APPLY, send full CV, reprints of a sampling of first-authored
publications, addresses (preferably email) and phones of at least three
professional references to Dr. Andrew Paterson, Plant Genome Mapping
Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.  EMAIL
ahp2343@bioch.tamu.edu.  Affirmative Action/EOE.

From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Wed Nov 26 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!internet!biosci!not-for-mail
From: biohelp (BIOSCI Administrator)
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: BIOSCI/bionet miniFAQ & Fundraiser
Date: 27 Nov 1997 02:00:39 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 233
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199711271000.CAA07962@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

(LAST REVISION: 30-JUL-95)

This BIOSCI "miniFAQ" is designed to answer the questions that come up
the *most frequently*.  The main BIOSCI FAQ (Frequently Asked
Questions) is accessible on the World Wide Web at URL
http://www.bio.net/.

If you can not find an answer to your question in this or other
documentation, the BIOSCI technical support staff answers e-mail
queries sent to

		       biosci-help@net.bio.net

We can only answer questions about the use of the newsgroups and
mailing lists.  We unfortunately do not have the staff to do Internet
information searches or answer scientific questions.  Please post
those to the appropriate BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.


	Contents:
	--------
	0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!

	1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.

	2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.

	3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.

	4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.


0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!
------------------------------
BIOSCI's government funding has been expended, and we are now
operating solely from advertising revenue that we have raised from our
Web site at http://www.bio.net/.  We need just a few minutes of your
time to help us serve you.

You can do two important things which will take very little time for
you individually and will immensely help us continue to help you.

First, please use our WWW system at http://www.bio.net/ to access the
archives.  You can post or reply to messages via your Web browser as
described in item #1 below.  Your usage helps attract sponsors. If you
contact any of our sponsors, please be sure to thank them for
supporting BIOSCI. It is critical for them to get this feedback if
they are to continue their sponsorship for the long term.

Second, if you work for a company or organization that provides
products or services of interest to the biology community, please pass
this message on to your marketing or marketing communications
department or other appropriate group.  Please ask them to help
support BIOSCI by sponsoring our Web site and explain the uses and
benefits of the system to the biology community. If they are
interested, they can then contact us for further information at our
tech support address, biosci-help@net.bio.net.


1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.
--------------------------------------------------------
As of 10 December 1995, all BIOSCI/bionet full newsgroups are
accessible through the World Wide Web (WWW) at URL http://www.bio.net.
One can read and reply publicly or privately to both recent postings
and archived messages through one's Web browser if it is configured
properly to send e-mail.  Each newsgroup is equipped with its own WAIS
index.  The main BIOSCI home page also has access to the BIO-JOURNALS
Table of Contents database WAIS index and the BIOSCI user address
database described in another item further below.


2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.
-------------------------------------------------------
BIOSCI is a set of parallel USENET newsgroups (the "bionet" groups),
mailing lists, and a hypermail archive at URL http://www.bio.net/.
The same postings are distributed on all media (except for a small
number of mailing-list-only groups at net.bio.net).  Unfortunately it
is becoming a despicable practice on the Internet (by a few people out
to make a fast buck) to do automated mass postings to thousands of
newsgroups and mailing lists.  These attempts to grab free advertising
are refered to as "spams" in the usual, somewhat boneheaded, net
terminology.  USENET is more susceptible to this practice, and many
spams originate on the USENET groups and then are passed on to the
mailing lists.  However, spammers also get lists of mailing addresses
and hit these too, so neither medium is immune.

What should you do personally if you get junk mail?
---------------------------------------------------
Just delete it and move on without reading it further.  Filing a
protest is becoming increasingly useless because spammers are often
disguising the addresses where the messages are sent from.  Unless you
really understand Internet mail systems, your attempt at protest by
sending replies to the message will often end up being sent to the
address of an innocent person that the spammer is victimizing.

What can BIOSCI/bionet do to protect its newsgroups?
----------------------------------------------------
The only solution currently available is to moderate the newsgroup.
If this newsgroup is already moderated, then you are in good shape.
Moderation protects the USENET distribution from about 95% of the
spams that are being sent to date and protects the mailing lists
completely.  Moderation means, however, that someone has to take the
time to review each message before it goes out.  We have set up
software here that simply allows the moderator to forward to an
address at net.bio.net messages that (s)he wishes to have distributed.
This takes no more time than that needed to read the message and pass
it on, say about 1 min. per message.

Most newsgroups currently have a discussion leader who is responsible
for their newsgroup.  The discussions leaders and their e-mail
addresses are listed in the BIOSCI Information Sheet which is
available on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  If a newsgroup is being
hit with too many junk postings, please contact the discussion leader
for that group and see if there is interest in moderating the group.
Please do not assume that by simply posting a complaint to the
newsgroup itself, anyone on the BIOSCI staff will act on your
complaint.  With close to 100 newsgroups to run, the BIOSCI staff has
to rely on the discussion leaders of each newsgroup to report problems
directly to us at biosci-help@net.bio.net.

We will moderate any of our newsgroups if the discussion leader tells
us that the readership of the group wishes to do so and if a moderator
is willing to do the work.  For most BIOSCI/bionet groups, this
entails only a few minutes of work each day.

Moderating a newsgroup will resolve probably 95% of the junk postings
on the USENET distribution.  Unfortunately there are easy ways for
determined spammers to override the moderation mechanism on USENET,
but we can protect our e-mail subscribers from unwanted postings if
the newsgroup is moderated.  You can also access our newsgroups over
the WWW at URL http://www.bio.net.  While this Web interface will not
stop spammers from trying to post to the groups, this will give you
yet another way, besides using USENET news, to keep the junk out of
your personal mail files.  For those of you with local USENET news
systems, the Web interface will also give you faster access to new
newsgroups and recent postings.


3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.
------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE NOTE: The BIOSCI management does NOT act on
subscription/unsubscription requests that are posted improperly to the
newsgroups and mailing lists.  People who do this only bother everyone
on the lists to no avail.  Please be sure to follow the proper
procedures below.

Gory details are in the BIOSCI Information sheets on the Web at
http://www.bio.net.  Below we give an example utilizing the
METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list at both of our two BIOSCI sites:

Users in the Americas and Pacific Rim countries who use the BIOSCI
------------------------------------------------------------------
node at computer net.bio.net:
----------------------------

A) Determine the "listname" which is the <=8 character mail address
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   for the group.  These can be found in the BIOSCI Info. Sheet.  For
   the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS group the mailing address is
   methods@net.bio.net.  The listname is the portion of the address to
   the left of the @ sign, i.e., "methods".  The listname is used with
   the "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" commands illustrated below.

B) Mail all commands in the body of a mail message addressed to
   biosci-server@net.bio.net.  Do NOT send commands to the newsgroup
   posting addresses!  Leave the Subject: line blank, any text on it
   will be ignored.

C) In the body of your message put one or more of the following
   commands with an "end" command on the last line, e.g.,

   subscribe methods
   unsubscribe methods
   end

   Do NOT put your e-mail address or other text on these lines.  The
   server only allows you to cancel your subscription if the address
   on your mail header matches the address on our mailing list.
   Please ask for help at biosci-help@net.bio.net if your address has
   changed, e.g., if you know you are on the list but the server tells
   you that you are not a member.


Users in Europe, Africa, and Central Asia who use the BIOSCI node at
--------------------------------------------------------------------
computer daresbury.ac.uk (also known as dl.ac.uk):
-------------------------------------------------

To subscribe and unsubscribe to/from the BIOSCI lists, you need to
specify the full USENET newsgroup name with "bionet-news." prepended.
The USENET newsgroup names are listed in the BIOSCI Information sheet
on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  For the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list
the USENET newsgroup name is bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts, thus the
appropriate commands are

    sub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

    unsub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

These commands are included in a message addressed to mxt@dl.ac.uk,
NOT to the newsgroup mailing addresses.  As usual, include the text in
the body of the message as text on the Subject: line is ignored.

To unsubscribe from all the lists at the UK node, use

    unsub bionet-news

Please note that if the address in the list is different than the one
in your mail message header, you will not be able to unsubscribe by
this method. If you have problems, please mail biosci@daresbury.ac.uk.


4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Please take this opportunity to add your name, address, and research
interest information to the BIOSCI User Address Database if you have
not already done so.

You can fill out the address form directly through our Web page at URL
http://www.bio.net/adrform.html.

The address database is reindexed nightly for WWW access (the URL is
http://www.bio.net/).  If you are not directly on the Internet but can
reach it by e-mail, please use our waismail server to access the user
directory.  waismail use is described above.  You can also request a
user address form by e-mail from biosci-help@net.bio.net.

Please check your database entry from time-to-time to see if your
address information is still up-to-date.  Because of our limited
personnel resources, we ask that you resubmit a *complete* form to
revise your entry; we only replace complete entries and do not have
resources to edit old forms.


From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Wed Nov 26 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!zdc-e!szdc!newsp.zippo.com!mdrn
From: MORTAZAV@NET1CS.modares.ac.ir (S.M.J. Mortazavi)
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: I NEDD HELP !!
Date: 27 Nov 1997 01:25:11 -0800
Organization: None
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <1512C341233@net1cs.modares.ac.ir>
NNTP-Posting-Host: SpoolDir

Hi All,

  I want to subscribe bionet.genome.chromosomes . Please write me how can I 
participate in this newsgroup.

Best Wishes
S. M. Javad mortazavi Mehrabadi , Ph.D
e-mail : mortazav@net1cs.modares.ac.ir

From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Fri Nov 28 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uninett.no!news.net.uni-c.dk!news.uni-c.dk!news.uni-c.dk!news.cybercity.dk!not-for-mail
From: "Ivan Moller" <ivan.m@vip.cybercity.dk>
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes,sci.bio.technology
Subject: Re: Length of Human DNA.
Date: 29 Nov 1997 15:00:30 GMT
Organization: A poorly-installed InterNetNews site
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <01bcfcd7$99e633a0$a28a08c3@default>
References: <3478E0F5.D2A48114@hex21.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: msx-05-2-1.1033.cybercity.dk
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1157

> How many nucleotides are in human DNA?
> And, is the number of nucleotides in human DNA constant across humans
> Is that number close? 6 billion? Or are there much more or much less?
> I read in a book that there were 200,000 genes in human DNA, and it said
> 1000 nucleotides per gene, which has to be an approximation, right? Since
3
> nucleotides gives you an amino acid, wouldn't the number of nucleotides
in a 
> gene have to be evenly divisible by 3?
> 
> But by that calculation, 200 million base pairs approximately in a human
> DNA?

The correct size of the human genome is 2.8 bilion base pairs (two
nucleotides)

Your calculation assumes that the DNA only consists of genes, like pearls
on
a string, which is not correct. 
Yes, the number of base pairs that encodes the protein is divisible by 3.

> 
> How do we know that introns are non functional? Introns exist within a
> gene, right?

All we know is that they don't encode the final protein, as they are
spliced out of the messenger RNA, than encodes the protein.

> Not junk outside of start and stop codons, right?

No, it's inside the start and stop codon.



From owner-chromosomes@net.bio.net Sun Nov 30 22:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!GOLD.TC.UMN.EDU!linst003
From: linst003@GOLD.TC.UMN.EDU (Tom Linstroth)
Newsgroups: bionet.genome.chromosomes
Subject: chromosomes
Date: 30 Nov 1997 17:42:20 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 6
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <34813638.2700@gold.tc.umn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

I need a list of common organisms with their number of chromosomes to
complete a homework assignment. My teacher has asked for 25 different
organisms. Will some kind person please help direct me to a source of
reference as everything I have seen on the net is too technical. Thanks

JBL

