From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Wed Feb 01 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!adam.cc.sunysb.edu!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.moneng.mei.com!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!decwrl!tribune.usask.ca!quartz.ucs.ualberta.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!leblanc
From: leblanc@unixg.ubc.ca (Heidi N LeBlanc)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.bio-matrix,bionet.molbio.embldatabank,bionet.molbio.evolution,bionet.molbio.gdb,bionet.molbio.genome-program,bionet.molbio.hiv,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.molbio.yeast,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Re: controversies & ethics
Followup-To: bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.bio-matrix,bionet.molbio.embldatabank,bionet.molbio.evolution,bionet.molbio.gdb,bionet.molbio.genome-program,bionet.molbio.hiv,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.molbio.yeast,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Date: 2 Feb 1995 17:45:59 GMT
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <3gr5on$amt@nnrp.ucs.ubc.ca>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950130115343.5258D-100000@rocky> <3gk3au$pdp@rebecca.albany.edu> <3gm7u9$t5e@nntp1.u.washington.edu> <MjA0jS200WBMA7T1sy@andrew.cmu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: interchg.ubc.ca
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.ageing:1224 bionet.molbio.bio-matrix:537 bionet.molbio.embldatabank:439 bionet.molbio.evolution:2394 bionet.molbio.gdb:285 bionet.molbio.genome-program:1148 bionet.molbio.hiv:865 bionet.molbio.rapd:954 bionet.molbio.yeast:2287 bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:519

One of the problems isn't so much what we *do* with biotechnology, as how 
what we do is generally perceived.  We as scientists think "Oh, what a 
clever idea, putting an arctic fish gene into strawberries".  
Non-scientists, with whatever level of education, often seem to think 
this is just monstrous.  The issue might not really be whether what we 
are doing is ethical, or whether the ethics are unique to biotech, but 
rather that the level of tinkering we can achieve is vaguely felt to be 
just plain unnatural.  The ethical problems might really be PR problems, 
and no less real for that.  

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Wed Feb 01 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!daresbury!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!emu.pmms.cam.ac.uk!rgep
From: rgep@emu.pmms.cam.ac.uk (Richard Pinch)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: DNA profiling statistics
Followup-To: sci.math
Date: 2 Feb 1995 18:12:16 GMT
Organization: DPMMS University of Cambridge
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <3gr7a0$9f2@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: emu.pmms.cam.ac.uk
Summary: Reference wanted to mathematical techniques used
Keywords: DNA profiling; statistical techniques

Can anyone provide me with a reference to the statistical techniques
used in DNA profiling (`fingerprinting')?  I would prefer an explanation
which assumes little or no knowledge of molecular biology but addresses
the mathematical problems in a reasonably sophisticated way.

Thanks,

Richard Pinch;	Queens' College, Cambridge


From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 02 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!CS.Arizona.EDU!news.Arizona.EDU!hamblin.math.byu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!world!chi
From: chi@world.std.com (Cambridge Healthtech Institute)
Subject: Genetic Screening Meeting
Message-ID: <D3Fx0G.CI8@world.std.com>
Organization: Cambridge Healthtech Institute
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 1995 20:02:39 GMT
Lines: 43
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:23957 bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:527

Cambridge Healthtech Institute is sponsoring a conference: 
"Advances  in Genetic Screening and Diagnosis of Human Diseases,"
to be held March 9-10, 1995 in San Francisco, California.

Breakthroughs in understanding the genetic basis for 
inherited diseases and genes that determine predisposition 
to a number of other more common disorders are occurring 
almost weekly.  This is the result of technical advances 
spinning off of the Human Genome Project, and a recognition 
of the tremendous medical and commercial value of such 
capabilities.  A number of the disorders for which gene 
identification is being pursued will be highlighted.  Part 
of the growth in genetic testing will occur as the number of 
genes for which tests become available explodes in the next 
few years.  Another key factor will be the potential for 
drastic reductions in costs, which will shift the emphasis 
from single application testing of high risk individuals to 
preventive screeniing of much broader populations.  New 
technology, including chip-based devices, will make it 
possible to simultaneously test for many genes and 
mutations.  These developments will force enormous changes 
in healthcare, insurance and society.  A number of speakers 
will address the anticipated impact of these changes, as 
well as commercial implications of these new tests.  A panel 
of executives from four of the leading diagnostic companies 
will conclude the meeting with discussion of their vision of 
the key issues and challenges for this field.

For more information contact Cambridge Healthtech Institute: 
chi@world.std.com


***********************************************************************
*>>>>>>>>>>>>        Cambridge Healthtech Institute      <<<<<<<<<<<<<*
*>>>>>               1000 Winter Street, Suite 3700              <<<<<*
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~          Waltham, MA  02154       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
*tel: 617.487.7989                                   fax: 617.487.7937*
*e-mail: chi@world.std.com      ++++++++    ftp: ftp.std.com: /pub/chi*
*>>>>>>>>>>>>World Wide Web: http://id.wing.net/~chi/homepg.html<<<<<<*
***********************************************************************




From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 02 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!daresbury!bioftp.unibas.ch!citi2.fr!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!swidir.switch.ch!news.unige.ch!usenet
From: mike@medsun.unige.ch (Mike Morris)
Subject: LOD score too high - answers
Message-ID: <1995Feb3.154305.27274@news.unige.ch>
Sender: usenet@news.unige.ch
Reply-To: mike@medsun.unige.ch
Organization: University of Geneva -Medical Center-, Switzerland
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 1995 15:43:05 GMT
Lines: 26

  You may remember I posted this query a few days ago (if you don't
remember, you are probably not interested!). 
  Thanks for all your answers - the group is read by a lot more
people than you might suspect!

  To remind you, when testing a disease against two closely-linked
(to each other) markers, using MLINK, I got:
	1 (disease), 2	lod = 4.7
	1, 3		lod = 2.7
	1, 2, 3		lod = 16!

  The consensus was (which makes perfect sense - I was simply ignorant)
that the third value is "Ott's generalized lod score", which is based
on the probability of ALL THREE LOCI BEING LINKED versus ALL 3 BEING
UNLINKED. And I know that 2 of them are linked.

  So there you are! Thanks, folks

	Mike Morris

*******************************************************************           
Division of Medical Genetics       tel (Switzerland) (22) 702.56.94
CMU, University of Geneva          fax (Switzerland) (22) 702.57.06
Geneva, Switzerland                email mike@medsun.unige.ch                  



From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 02 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.moneng.mei.com!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!decwrl!waikato!auckland.ac.nz!NewsWatcher!user
From: JEB.Harrison@auckland.ac.nz (Jane E B Harrison)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.molbio.gene-org,bionet.molbio.genome-program
Subject: Databases
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 1995 15:15:03 +1200
Organization: University of Auckland
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <JEB.Harrison-0302951515030001@130.216.55.60>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.216.55.60
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:521 bionet.molbio.genome-program:1151

Hullo all,

A Collegue of mine is after a database for human chromosomal
translocations.  Does such a beast exist?  How would a person get to the
database?  

Please email responses.

Thanks x 10E6

JAne

-- 
Jane E B Harrison                     "Science is like being God-
Medical School                        only I have time and budget constraints"
University of Auckland           
'All opinons are MINE and MINE alone'

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 02 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!CS.Arizona.EDU!news.Arizona.EDU!hamblin.math.byu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!caen!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gatech!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!festival!leeds.ac.uk!news
From: gen6ads@sun.leeds.ac.uk (A D Stewart)
Subject: Re: My LOD score is too high!
Message-ID: <1995Feb3.125632.23783@leeds.ac.uk>
Reply-To: gen6ads@sun.leeds.ac.uk
Organization: University of Leeds, U.K.
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 1995 12:56:31 +0000 (GMT)
References: <1995Feb1.073351.16180@news.unige.ch>
Lines: 46

In article 16180@news.unige.ch, mike@medsun.unige.ch (Mike Morris) writes:
>  Not a common complaint, I guess. But I cannot understand (or believe)
>a result we recently had from LINKAGE 5.1.
>
>  We have a consanguineous family, with a monogenic AR disease (locus
>1). We have two perfectly linked markers (2 and 3), which complement 
>each other in terms of informativity. The markers are at most 1% apart
>(no rec. in this family).
> 
>  I ran MLINK, "Lod score table", with the following results:
>  Locus order   Rec fractions   Rec varied   lod max (always theta=0)
>      1 2             .0            1           3.1
>      1 3             .0            1           1.3
>  >>> 1 2 3         .0 .01          1          16.1  <<< 
>
>  As I understand this, either I have screwed up somewhere, or the
>program interprets the third line as "1 vs. superlocus 2+3", and I
>get a genuine result. But 16 seems much too high!
>
>  Can anyone clarify this for me?
>
>	Mike Morris
>
>*******************************************************************           
>Division of Medical Genetics       tel (Switzerland) (22) 702.56.94
>CMU, University of Geneva          fax (Switzerland) (22) 702.57.06
>Geneva, Switzerland                email mike@medsun.unige.ch                  
>
>


Its not possible to say what your lod score should be without knowing
your pedigree structure, of course.

Why don't you simulate the maximum lod score that you could get
by inputting a single hypothetical 'magic marker' which is fully
informative (from what you say, this would be equivalent to 
numbering each of the haplotypes of your existing data as a single
locus, reasonable if there is no recombination with such close markers).
The marker allele frequencies could be very important - try a wide range 
for the disease-linked allele. 
This is not a tidy theoretical answer, but should give you the information
you need. 




From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 02 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.software
Path: biosci!CS.Arizona.EDU!news.Arizona.EDU!hamblin.math.byu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!pipex!uknet!bcc.ac.uk!dac159!dcurtis
From: dcurtis@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (David Curtis)
Subject: Re: Linkage software complex trait analysis
Sender: news@ucl.ac.uk (Usenet News System)
Message-ID: <dcurtis.58.000DFD7D@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 1995 13:59:19 GMT
References: <3g3g1k$7lc@hawk.le.ac.uk> <3gbisp$n63@nic-nac.CSU.net>
Organization: Institute of Psychiatry
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]
Lines: 15
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:525 bionet.software:10928


>>       I'm looking at genetic susceptiblity in the mouse. 
>>I've done an F2 cross between resistant and susceptible strains 
>>and now I'm trying to identify any regions of the genome that 
>>may have susceptiblity genes, using linkage.

>Well, I've heard of a program called "LINKAGE". Maybe you can ftp somewhere
>and get it. I dunno if it's public domain.

Yes it's public domain.No it's no good for experimental crosses, it's for 
generalised pedigrees in humans. I doubt you'd find it with archie. It's 
available (as the FASTLINK package) at gc.bcm.tmc.edu.




From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 02 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!news.ttu.edu!aurora.LaTech.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!pipex!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!bcc.ac.uk!dac159!dcurtis
From: dcurtis@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (David Curtis)
Subject: Re: Commenting pedfiles?
Sender: news@ucl.ac.uk (Usenet News System)
Message-ID: <dcurtis.57.000DE1CE@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 1995 13:52:49 GMT
References:  <1995Jan30.133338.15924@news.unige.ch>
Organization: Institute of Psychiatry
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]
Lines: 5

>  Is it possible to include comments in pedfiles ? They seem so 
>sensitive to odd spaces or returns that it seems unlikely, but...

You can append comments to the ends of lines in most circumstances (not when 
e.g. using ERPA) 

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 02 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!agate!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gatech!swiss.ans.net!emi.com!pauling.wadsworth.org!rebecca!labonnes
From: labonnes@csc.albany.edu (S. LaBonne)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.bio-matrix,bionet.molbio.embldatabank,bionet.molbio.evolution,bionet.molbio.gdb,bionet.molbio.genome-program,bionet.molbio.hiv,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.molbio.yeast,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Re: controversies & ethics
Date: 2 Feb 1995 21:41:47 GMT
Organization: University at Albany, SUNY
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <3grjir$n5d@rebecca.albany.edu>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950130115343.5258D-100000@rocky> <3gm7u9$t5e@nntp1.u.washington.edu> <MjA0jS200WBMA7T1sy@andrew.cmu.edu> <3gr5on$amt@nnrp.ucs.ubc.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bathsheba.albany.edu
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.ageing:1227 bionet.molbio.bio-matrix:539 bionet.molbio.embldatabank:442 bionet.molbio.evolution:2397 bionet.molbio.gdb:287 bionet.molbio.genome-program:1154 bionet.molbio.hiv:867 bionet.molbio.rapd:956 bionet.molbio.yeast:2301 bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:523

In article <3gr5on$amt@nnrp.ucs.ubc.ca>,
Heidi N LeBlanc <leblanc@unixg.ubc.ca> wrote:
>One of the problems isn't so much what we *do* with biotechnology, as how 
>what we do is generally perceived.  We as scientists think "Oh, what a 
>clever idea, putting an arctic fish gene into strawberries".  
>Non-scientists, with whatever level of education, often seem to think 
>this is just monstrous.  The issue might not really be whether what we 
>are doing is ethical, or whether the ethics are unique to biotech, but 
>rather that the level of tinkering we can achieve is vaguely felt to be 
>just plain unnatural.  The ethical problems might really be PR problems, 
>and no less real for that.  

I quite agree, and my fear is that we needlessly _exacerbate_ these PR
problems if we single out biotechnology for the kind of special treatment
exemplified by the proposed course that started this discussion.  Then
naturally laypeople conclude, "Gee, even the scientists think this stuff
is especially problematical, so we _certainly_ should be worried".

-- 
Steve LaBonne *********************** (labonnes@csc.albany.edu)
"It can never be satisfied, the mind, never." - Wallace Stevens

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 02 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!emi.com!pauling.wadsworth.org!rebecca!labonnes
From: labonnes@csc.albany.edu (S. LaBonne)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.bio-matrix,bionet.molbio.embldatabank,bionet.molbio.evolution,bionet.molbio.gdb,bionet.molbio.genome-program,bionet.molbio.hiv,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.molbio.yeast,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Re: controversies & ethics
Date: 2 Feb 1995 16:43:49 GMT
Organization: University at Albany, SUNY
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <3gr245$i9p@rebecca.albany.edu>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950130115343.5258D-100000@rocky> <3gm7u9$t5e@nntp1.u.washington.edu> <3gml85$fb5@rebecca.albany.edu> <MjA0jS200WBMA7T1sy@andrew.cmu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: freia.albany.edu
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.ageing:1226 bionet.molbio.bio-matrix:538 bionet.molbio.embldatabank:440 bionet.molbio.evolution:2395 bionet.molbio.gdb:286 bionet.molbio.genome-program:1152 bionet.molbio.hiv:866 bionet.molbio.rapd:955 bionet.molbio.yeast:2298 bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:522

In article <MjA0jS200WBMA7T1sy@andrew.cmu.edu>,
Howard M. Bomze <hb10+@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>   Steve Bonne has been saying that there are no new ethical
>considerations for agricultural biotechnologies.  However, he has been
>missing one very important one, that is the possibility of an engineered
>gene to be transfered to a different species.  The transgenic plant not
>only has the sequences of the desired gene, it also contains the
>sequences which are necesary to insert the gene into the genome.  So a
>question which must be looked at is this:  If a gene for herbicide
>resistance has been put into a corn plant so that that herbicide can be
>used to kill all of the crab grass in the corn field, what happens if
>the gene is transfered to the crab grass?  

Is there an _ethical_ problem here?  I guess I can parse this as
meaning, "if we failed to be concerned about this possibility and
released the engineered corn without satisfying ourselves that it
won't happen, we would be behaving unethically".  Certainly I agree.

Since comparable transfers of desired traits have been performed by
selective breeding since the Neolithic (not to mention that horizontal
gene transfers occur all the time in nature), I still don't see the
_qualitatively_ new ethical considerations that you seem to think
exist here.  (Introducing rabbits into Australia is a good
pre-biotechnology example of failing to anticipate massive undesired
consequences of an environmental manipulation.) Don't get me wrong- we
clearly need to start thinking a lot more seriously about the
potential undesired impacts of _all_ new technologies.  I just think
that to single out biotechnology as some kind of special case borders
on superstition.


-- 
Steve LaBonne *********************** (labonnes@csc.albany.edu)
"It can never be satisfied, the mind, never." - Wallace Stevens

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Fri Feb 03 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!hubcap.clemson.edu!biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!emi.com!pauling.wadsworth.org!rebecca!labonnes
From: labonnes@csc.albany.edu (S. LaBonne)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.bio-matrix,bionet.molbio.embldatabank,bionet.molbio.evolution,bionet.molbio.gdb,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.molbio.genome-program,bionet.molbio.hiv,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.molbio.yeast
Subject: Re: controversies & ethics
Date: 31 Jan 1995 01:21:34 GMT
Organization: University at Albany, SUNY
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <3gk3au$pdp@rebecca.albany.edu>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950130115343.5258D-100000@rocky>
NNTP-Posting-Host: freia.albany.edu
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.ageing:1230 bionet.molbio.bio-matrix:541 bionet.molbio.embldatabank:444 bionet.molbio.evolution:2403 bionet.molbio.gdb:288 bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:529 bionet.molbio.genome-program:1158 bionet.molbio.hiv:869 bionet.molbio.rapd:957 bionet.molbio.yeast:2304

In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.950130115343.5258D-100000@rocky>,
Phandaal  <ez006804@peseta.ucdavis.edu> wrote:
>I've been asked to give a lecture to upper-division college students on
>the controversies and ethical considerations in producing transgenic
>organisms, especially transgenic plants.  It's been a while since I gave
>this lecture, and so I was wondering if anybody had any good examples of
>controversies or ethical considerations that I could incorporate into the 
>talk.
>
>Two I can think of off-hand are:
>
>1) introducing insecticidal proteins (such as the Bacillus thuringiensis
>protein) into plants may create resistant insect populations (under the
>force of heavy selection pressure), which could then overrun the resistant
>plants and make worthless the efforts by conventional growers who *use* Bt
>protein as a topical pesticidal spray. 
>
>2) altering fatty acid metabolism in oil-crops (like canola) so that they 
>produce oils found chiefly in palm and coconut could severely damage the 
>palm oil and coconut oil industries in Third World countries... thus 
>severely depressing the economies of these already struggling countries.

My problem with these examples is that I see nothing about them that
is unique to transgenic technology.  Similar sorts of problems are
raised all the time by "conventional" technologies, including very
ancient ones like selective breeding.  An analogue to 1 is simply
overuse of pesticides (or antibiotics for that matter), which can
render them worthless in the way you describe.  And 2 in no way
raises ethical issues different from, say, starting a palm oil
industry in Key West, possibly after selective breeding of oil
palms to produce strains that give high yields there.

Indeed, I doubt that there _are_ any ethical issues which depend
_specifically_ on agricultural use of biotechnology as opposed
to agricultural technologies in general.  

-- 
Steve LaBonne *********************** (labonnes@csc.albany.edu)
"It can never be satisfied, the mind, never." - Wallace Stevens

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Sat Feb 04 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!news.uh.edu!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!mckee
From: mckee@starbase.neosoft.com (George McKee)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.bio-matrix,bionet.molbio.embldatabank,bionet.molbio.evolution,bionet.molbio.gdb,bionet.molbio.genome-program,bionet.molbio.hiv,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.molbio.yeast,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Re: controversies & ethics
Followup-To: bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.bio-matrix,bionet.molbio.embldatabank,bionet.molbio.evolution,bionet.molbio.gdb,bionet.molbio.genome-program,bionet.molbio.hiv,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.molbio.yeast,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Date: 5 Feb 1995 15:25:32 GMT
Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services   +1 713 968 5800
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <3h2qlc$d6o@uuneo.neosoft.com>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950130115343.5258D-100000@rocky> <3gk3au$pdp@rebecca.albany.edu> <3gm7u9$t5e@nntp1.u.washington.edu> <MjA0jS200WBMA7T1sy@andrew.cmu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: starbase.neosoft.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.ageing:1236 bionet.molbio.bio-matrix:543 bionet.molbio.embldatabank:445 bionet.molbio.evolution:2412 bionet.molbio.gdb:290 bionet.molbio.genome-program:1164 bionet.molbio.hiv:871 bionet.molbio.rapd:960 bionet.molbio.yeast:2314 bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:530

Howard M. Bomze (hb10+@andrew.cmu.edu) wrote:
:    Steve Bonne has been saying that there are no new ethical
: considerations for agricultural biotechnologies.  However, he has been
: missing one very important one, that is the possibility of an engineered
: gene to be transfered to a different species.  The transgenic plant not
: only has the sequences of the desired gene, it also contains the
: sequences which are necesary to insert the gene into the genome.

This is one of those "ethical" problems that are really biological
problems in disguise.  Injecting new genes into the genomes of other
organisms is precisely what retroviruses such as HIV have been doing
for eons longer than biologists.  To consider genetic engineering
per se to be unethical is the same as considering crossbreeding
unethical.
	The ethical considerations come into play when the new
variety, however it was created, is being considered for introduction
into the ecosystem.  Introducing the gypsy moth into North America
as a silk producer was far more disastrous than any frost-free
tomato is likely to be.

	- George McKee
--
Internet: mckee@neosoft.com
Voice: +1 713 890 8122

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Sun Feb 05 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!adam.cc.sunysb.edu!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.moneng.mei.com!uwm.edu!msunews!netnews.upenn.edu!sanger.bcm.tju.edu!tromp
From: tromp@sanger.bcm.tju.edu (Gerard Tromp)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.software
Subject: Re: Linkage software complex trait analysis
Date: 6 Feb 1995 17:20:01 GMT
Organization: Biochemistry
Lines: 29
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3h5lo1$co6@netnews.upenn.edu>
References: <3g3g1k$7lc@hawk.le.ac.uk> <3gbisp$n63@nic-nac.CSU.net> <dcurtis.58.000DFD7D@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sanger.bcm.tju.edu
Keywords: S.A.G.E., Mapmaker
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:533 bionet.software:10961


There are packages for mapping with experimental animal crosses. One that comes 
to mind is S.A.G.E. , a package available from Dr. Elston at Louisiana State
Medical Center in New Orleans. Another is MAPMAKER by Eric Lander et al., 
available by anonymous ftp from genome.wi.mit.edu.  



Notes about availability of LINKAGE and FASTLINK.

1. LINKAGE is available by anonymous ftp at york.cpmc.columbia.edu, the site is 
   that of Dr. Jurg Ott, one of the co-authors of the package. The operating
   system is VMS - VAX - and may be somewhat unfamiliar to those who are used to 
   unix.
2. FASTLINK is available by anonymous ftp at softlib.rice.edu, the site is that of
   Dr. Alejandro Schaffer. Dr. Schaffer maintains and improves FASTLINK, so it 
   would be to your advantage to retrieve it from there rather than from other 
   sites.

-- 

Gerard Tromp, Ph.D.
Research Assistant Professor		Vox:	215-955-4487
Department of Biochemistry			215-955-4488 
	and Molecular Biology		Fax:	215-955-5393
Thomas Jefferson University
233 South Tenth Street, Room 328	E-mail:	tromp@sanger.bcm.tju.edu
Philadelphia, PA 19107 
U.S.A. 

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Sun Feb 05 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!news.oleane.net!oleane!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!swidir.switch.ch!news.unige.ch!NewsWatcher!user
From: bottani@cmu.unige.ch (A. Bottani)
Subject: Bartter syndrome
Message-ID: <bottani-0602951633250001@129.194.99.70>
Sender: usenet@news.unige.ch
Organization: Division of Medical Genetics, University of Geneva
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 1995 15:33:25 GMT
Lines: 13

Does someone know if the Bartter syndrome gene has recently been mapped? I
have the vague feeling that I saw it in one of the genetic journals, but
cannot remember where...
Would be glad to get the exact reference (in case I am not dreaming...)

-- 
Armand Bottani, MD
Division of Medical Genetics
9, Av. de Champel
CH - 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
Tel. (+41) - 22 - 702 5709
Fax. (+41) - 22 - 702 5706
Email bottani@cmu.unige.ch

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Mon Feb 06 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!galaxy.ucr.edu!ratatosk.yggdrasil.com!news.duke.edu!godot.cc.duq.edu!hudson.lm.com!news.pop.psu.edu!news.cac.psu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.moneng.mei.com!uwm.edu!msunews!netnews.upenn.edu!sanger.bcm.tju.edu!tromp
From: tromp@sanger.bcm.tju.edu (Gerard Tromp)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.software
Subject: Re: Linkage software complex trait analysis
Date: 6 Feb 1995 17:20:01 GMT
Organization: Biochemistry
Lines: 29
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3h5lo1$co6@netnews.upenn.edu>
References: <3g3g1k$7lc@hawk.le.ac.uk> <3gbisp$n63@nic-nac.CSU.net> <dcurtis.58.000DFD7D@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sanger.bcm.tju.edu
Keywords: S.A.G.E., Mapmaker
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:534 bionet.software:10975


There are packages for mapping with experimental animal crosses. One that comes 
to mind is S.A.G.E. , a package available from Dr. Elston at Louisiana State
Medical Center in New Orleans. Another is MAPMAKER by Eric Lander et al., 
available by anonymous ftp from genome.wi.mit.edu.  



Notes about availability of LINKAGE and FASTLINK.

1. LINKAGE is available by anonymous ftp at york.cpmc.columbia.edu, the site is 
   that of Dr. Jurg Ott, one of the co-authors of the package. The operating
   system is VMS - VAX - and may be somewhat unfamiliar to those who are used to 
   unix.
2. FASTLINK is available by anonymous ftp at softlib.rice.edu, the site is that of
   Dr. Alejandro Schaffer. Dr. Schaffer maintains and improves FASTLINK, so it 
   would be to your advantage to retrieve it from there rather than from other 
   sites.

-- 

Gerard Tromp, Ph.D.
Research Assistant Professor		Vox:	215-955-4487
Department of Biochemistry			215-955-4488 
	and Molecular Biology		Fax:	215-955-5393
Thomas Jefferson University
233 South Tenth Street, Room 328	E-mail:	tromp@sanger.bcm.tju.edu
Philadelphia, PA 19107 
U.S.A. 

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Mon Feb 06 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!HELIX.MGH.HARVARD.EDU!HAINES
From: HAINES@HELIX.MGH.HARVARD.EDU ("Jonathan L. Haines")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: call for abstracts
Date: 7 Feb 1995 08:06:04 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 113
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <01HMRKRGHHQA8XNFWF@HELIX.MGH.HARVARD.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

                            CALL FOR ABSTRACTS


                    THE 1995 INTERNATIONAL CHROMOSOME 9
                                 WORKSHOP


The 1995 International Chromosome 9 Workshop will be held from
April 23 to April 25, 1995 in Williamsburg, Virginia, USA.  

 ABSTRACTS MUST BE RECEIVED NO LATER THAN MARCH 1ST, 1995.

Electronic transmission in addition to hard copy submission is
strongly encouraged.  Abstracts should be emailed to the following
address:

                        chrom9@genemap.mc.duke.edu.

If electronic submission is not possible, please send both the hard
copy of your abstract and an electronic version on diskette in
either WordPerfect 6.0 or ASCII format. Abstracts should be sent to
the following address:

                Dr. M.A. Pericak-Vance
                Bryan Research Building
                Research Drive
                Duke University Medical Center
                Box 2900
                Durham, NC  27705  USA
                Phone: (919)684-6274
                FAX: (919)684-6514

The format for the abstract should include

          title, author's names, and affilitiations
          separated by two lines from the body of the abstract.  

The body of the abstract should be no longer than 250 words. 
Abstracts will be judged competitively based on their strength of
contribution to the overall genetic and phyical map of chromosome
9.  Abstracts dealing solely with the mapping of specific disease
loci, without additional mapping information are discouraged. 
Notification of abstract acceptance will be by March 10, 1995.   
Abstract submission is not sufficient to guarantee either
attendance or reimbursement.  Participants with accepted abstracts
must confirm attendance by March 20, 1995.  Individuals who
register after that time are not guaranteed a place at the
workshop. 

In submitting your abstract please be aware of the following rules
that will apply to this year's workshop.  These stipulations are in
accordance with the new HUGO guidelines for workshop participation
and reinbursement.

1. Abstract submission is required for attendance.  Reimbursement
funds are available for 35 participants [17 US, 18 Other]. 
Reimbursement consideration will be competitive and based on
abstract content and its contribution to the genetic and physical
map of chromosome 9. A limited number of individuals will be able
to attend if they provide their own funding.  ONLY ONE INDIVIDUAL
PER LABORATORY [OR RESEARCH GROUP] WILL BE REIMBURSED.  THERE WILL
BE NO EXCEPTIONS.

2. Abstract acceptance does not automatically guarantee
reimbursement.  Reimbursement for both hotel and meals [all
participants] and travel [US participants only] will occur after
the workshop completion and ONLY AFTER SUBMISSION OF THE
INDIVIDUAL'S ABSTRACT DATA TO DRS. POVEY AND HAINES FOR GDB
SUBMISSION.  GDB submission forms will be included with your
abstract acceptance.  Completed GDB forms are required for
reimbursement and MUST be submitted BEFORE the workshop, as this
will hasten the reimbursement process.

Individuals attending the workshop and presenting data who fail to
meet the GDB submission requirements WILL NOT BE REIMBURSED for any
or part of the meeting.  THERE WILL BE NO EXCEPTIONS.

3. Reimbursement procedures and policies are as follows:

     a. All participants: 3 nights lodging [Saturday, Sunday, and
Monday] and board [dinner (Saturday) until lunch (Tuesday)] at the
George Washington Inn and Conference Center in Colonial
Williamsburg.  Additional lodging requirements are the
responsibility of the participants.  Prearranged ground
transportation by Van from the airport to hotel and back will also
be provided.

      b. US participants:  Travel for US participants will be
limited to reimbursements of no more than $600.00 in airfare. 
Saturday night stayover has been arranged to allow for reduced
rates.  Airfares OR or other travel expenditures exceeding $600.00
are the responsibility of the individual investigator.  Local
participants will be reimbursed for travel by car at the standard
rate of 0.30 per mile. TRAVEL FOR NON-US PARTICIPANTS IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANTS (BUT MAY BE COVERED
BY THEIR HOME COUNTRY (SEE BELOW).  HOWEVER, NON-US PARTICIPANTS
WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME STRICT CRITERIA FOR ABSTRACT ACCEPTANCE
AND ROOM AND BOARD REIMBURSEMENT.

     c. Non-US participants:  Europeans who hope to attend the
meeting should let Dr. Sue Povey know as soon as possible.  If your
abstract is accepted it is hoped that you will be eligible for
travel funding but the arrangements for applying for this varies
from country to country.  Dr. Bronwen Loder of HUGO will send
individual instructions as soon as your abstracts are accepted. 
She will also be able to give advice to non-European/non-US
applicants.  United Kingdom applications go directly to the MRC but
only after you are on the official list of invitees.

4.  All participants will be expected to prepare a poster
presentation of their submitted abstract.  Additional details for
poster submission will be provided after acceptance as will meeting
details including local travel arrangements, maps, etc..

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Mon Feb 06 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!rutgers!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!caen!msunews!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!iccu6!ppp2.ipswichcity.qld.gov.au!hanscom
From: hanscom@iccu6.ipswichcity.qld.gov.au (Hany Hanna)
Subject: Genetics
Sender: news@ipswichcity.qld.gov.au
Message-ID: <hanscom.18.00004E07@iccu6.ipswichcity.qld.gov.au>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 05:18:17 GMT
Lines: 10
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ppp2.ipswichcity.qld.gov.au
Organization: Global Infolinks Internet Server, Ipswich Qld Australia
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]

Hello all,

I have a few questions that I need to ask a professional in the field of 
genetics and hereditary problems.  However, because the metter must remain  
confidential, I must ask for a personal address and use E-mail.

So if you happen to know someone who can help, send me thier E-Mail address or 
give them mine.  This matter is very important to me,  I appreciate your help.

CU, HANY

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Mon Feb 06 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!rutgers!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!zip.eecs.umich.edu!panix!news.columbia.edu!namaste.cc.columbia.edu!wl101
From: wl101@namaste.cc.columbia.edu (Wentian Li)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Linkage Newsletter 9(1), Feb 1995
Date: 7 Feb 1995 16:33:13 GMT
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 232
Message-ID: <3h87c9$s48@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: namaste.cc.columbia.edu

                 .----------------------------.
                 |                            |
                 |     Linkage Newsletter     |
                 |                            |
                 `----------------------------'
                 Vol. 9   No. 1   February 1995

Published by Jurg Ott, Columbia University, New York

Editorial Assistant:  Katherine Montague
     Fax: 212-568-2750
     Tel. 212-960-2507
     E-mail:  jurg.ott@columbia.edu
Postal address:
     Columbia University, Unit 58
     722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032


LINKAGE COURSES

     In 1995, the following linkage courses will be held:

     February 27 - March 3:  Introductory course at the Universi-
ty of Zurich (Switzerland), Irchel Campus Computer Center.  This
course is full.
     June 12-16:  Introductory course at Columbia University, New
York (maximum of 30 participants).  We often receive many more
applications than we can accept and will carry this course twice
in case of high demand (date not yet set).
     October 2-6:  Advanced course at the University of Zurich
(Switzerland), Irchel Campus Computer Center.
     The next Advanced course at Columbia University will be held
early in January 1996.

     To obtain information on these courses, please write to
Katherine Montague, course coordinator, by e-mail or fax.  The
textbook to be used for theoretical background and course exer-
cises is Terwilliger JD & Ott J: Handbook of Human Genetic
Linkage, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994 (additional materi-
al for advanced courses will be handed out at the course). 
Course participants are expected to bring this book with them to
the course;  in case of problems please contact Katherine Monta-
gue.


UPGRADING OUR ftp SITE

Our anonymous ftp site (york.cpmc.columbia.edu) runs on an old
Vaxstation 3100 with ftp software that is not well adapted to the
system.  Unfortunately, the Vaxstation occasionally freezes up
and must be rebooted -- there is evidently little that can be
done about this.  So, if you experience problems accessing the
ftp site, please try again later.  Also, accessing it at night or
in the morning tends to be more successful than at peak hours.

     A new member of our team, Dr. Wentian Li, started installing
a new anonymous ftp site on our Sparcstation IPC.  It is expected
to be much more stable then the current one.  Furthermore, it
runs under Unix rather than under VMS as on the Vaxstation.  As
soon as a larger hard disk is installed, we will transfer all
files from the Vaxstation to the Sparcstation.  When ready, the
anonymous ftp site can be reached as linkage.cpmc.columbia.edu
and the old site (york.cpmc.columbia.edu) will be taken out of
service.  The new ftp site is expected to be up by mid-March.


SOFTWARE NEWS

ESPA program

We regularly receive requests for the ESPA program, which carries
out affected sib pair analysis with estimation of unobserved
parental marker genotypes.  This pro-gram is not available from
us -- please address any requests to the developer of ESPA, Dr.
Lodewijk Sandkuyil (sandkuyl@rullf2.LeidenUniv.nl), Voorstraat 27
a, 2611 JK  Delft, The Netherlands.  Tel: 011,31-15-123 638,
Fax: 011,31-15-143-925. 


Bug in LINKAGE regarding loops

Dr. Alejandro Schaffer submitted the following report:

     The purpose of this message is to report a dangerous bug in LINKAGE. 
     The bug is that if maxloop is set to a number strictly lower than the
     actual number of loops, then LINKAGE gives no warning.  In some cases it
     will give plausible but incorrect results.  In contrast, in FASTLINK if
     maxloop is set to a number strictly lower than the actual number of
     loops, the program gives a warning and exits with instructions on how to
     fix the problem, without computing anything.

Editor's note:  Readers of the Newsletter (January 1992) have
been made aware of this problem.  However, thus far no test had
been implemented in LINKAGE to catch the situation that maxloop
is smaller than the actual number of loops.  This test has now
been implemented in the DOS version of LINKAGE (available on our
ftp site) and will be implemented shortly in other LINKAGE
versions.


Newer versions of FASTLINK

The following announcement was submitted by Dr. Alejandro Schaf-
fer:

     Since May 1993, we have been distributing faster versions of the genetic
     linkage analysis programs in LINKAGE 5.1.  Several users have dubbed the
     new code "FASTLINK".

     Version 2.2 of FASTLINK is now ready and available.  The changes from
     version 2.1 (distributed in March 1994) include
       1. Bug fixes to bugs introduced in FASTLINK and bugs inherited from
          LINKAGE
       2. More dynamic memory allocation
       3. More diagnostics to detect user errors politely
       4. Crash-recovery is now possible for LINKMAP and MLINK, in addition
          to LODSCORE and ILINK
       5. Lots of information about portability of FASTLINK to different
          operating systems is included
       6. A document entitled "The Mystery of the Unknown" explaining how
          the preprocessor program UNKNOWN works among other goodies.  See
          the file README.updates, which comes with the distribution, for
          details.

     Like FASTLINK 2.1, this version is being distributed from a computer at
     Rice University.  Here are the instructions for retrieving the code:

          ftp softlib.cs.rice.edu

     Login as anonymous and leave your full e-mail address as password.

          cd pub/fastlink

     In that directory you will find various files.  You can get everything
     at once by retrieving the file:

          fastlink.tar.Z

     and then (outside of ftp) doing the commands:

          uncompress fastlink.tar.Z
          tar xvf fastlink.tar

     If you prefer to get your files piecemeal, instead of getting
     fastlink.tar.Z, start by getting README* The file README (with no
     extension) will give you a roadmap to all the documentation.  I am
     maintaining a mailing list of FASTLINK users.  If you have retrieved the
     code and would like to be on the mailing list, send me e-mail at the
     address below.

     Special thanks to many FASTLINK users including:  Lucien Bachner, Alan
     Cox, David Featherstone, Sandep Gupta, Victoria Haghighi, Carol Haynes,
     Jerry Halpern, Kimmo Kallio, Luc Krols, Shriram Krishnamurthi, Tara Cox
     Matise, Ken Morgan, Jurg Ott, Steve Roberts, Joe Terwilliger, Gerard
     Tromp, Ellen Wijsman, Xiaoli Xie, who provided bug reports, suggestions
     for improvements, guidance on documentation, and assistance with
     portability.  I could not have prepared FASTLINK 2.2 without your help!

     We are also distributing executable versions of FASTLINK for DOS.  The
     ftp instructions are similar.  Instead of doing
          cd pub/fastlink
     do
          cd pub/fastlink/dos
          binary

     In that directory you will find 13 files.  One is an executable for
     UNKNOWN (called unknown.exe).  We have 3 versions each of LODSCORE,
     ILINK, LINKMAP, and MLINK with the constant maxhap set to 48, 96, 250
     respectively.  For example, the file li96.exe is LINKMAP with maxhap set
     to 96 and the file il250.exe is ILINK with maxhap set to 250.  maxhap is
     the maximum product allowed for the number of alleles at each locus. 
     For example, if you want to a 3-locus analysis with 2x4x8=64 alleles,
     you should not use the versions with maxhap set to 48, but you can use
     either the 96 or 250 versions.

     Alejandro Schaffer, PhD
     Department of Computer Science
     Rice University
     Houston, TX 77251
     schaffer@cs.rice.edu
     Phone: (713) 527-8101 x3813
     FAX: (713) 285-5930


Compiling with the 'colig.bat' batch program

Dr. Joseph Terwilliger made me aware of a problem with the
'colig' batch program that we distribute to facilitate recompil-
ing the LINKAGE programs for DOS (Turbo/Borland Pascal):

     I have a question for you about the turbo pascal colig.bat file.  Why
     does it have the line del *.tp* at the end?  This seems to delete
     turbo.tpl, which is needed to compile the programs here on the PC's in
     Finland.  Is it okay to change that line to DEL *.TPU instead of TP*, to
     preserve the *.TPL files?

     Response:  When the LINKAGE programs are compiled with Tur-
bo/Borland Pascal, intermediate files are created and are left on
the hard disk.  These files are named *.tpx, where x=U for
regular Turbo Pascal, x=P when compiled for protected mode, and
x=W when compiled to run under Windows.  The statement 'del
*.tp*' deletes any of these files that might have been created. 
This procedure was chosen under the assumption that the compiler
would reside in a different directory.  If it resides in the same
directory as the programs to be compiled, one of the compiler
files, 'turbo.tpl', will also be deleted.  Thus, the 'colig.bat'
and 'colit.bat' batch programs have now been restructured so that
'turbo.tpl' will no longer be deleted.


Meeting Announcement

The following announcement has been submitted to the Newletter by
the meeting organizers:

     Fourth Annual meeting of the INTERNATIONAL GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY SOCIETY,
     June 20-22, 1995 - Snowbird, Utah.  The meeting will be held in the
     Cliff Lodge (just 29 miles from Salt Lake City International Airport) in
     conjunction with the Society of Epidemiological Research.  Abstracts for
     consideration of oral presentations and posters are due February 10,
     1995.  For abstract forms, contact Michele Brown, University of Utah,
     (801) 581-558099 or fax (801) 581-3165.  For program information contact
     Melissa Austin, University of Washington, Seattle, (206) 685-9384, fax
     (206) 685-3407.


Support through grant HG00008 from the National Center
for Human Genome Research is gratefully acknowledged.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wentian Li, Ph.D				tel: 212-960-2200 ext 490
Associate Research Scientist			     212-960-2507 (main office)
Department of Psychiatry			FAX: 212-568-2750

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Tue Feb 07 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!JEEVES.UCSD.EDU!hoschek
From: hoschek@JEEVES.UCSD.EDU (gisela hoschek)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: English Language Help
Date: 8 Feb 1995 10:08:51 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 17
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <9502081806.AB07710@jeeves.UCSD.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

     Editors and reviewers let me know that there is a need for help to
authors of research papers to be submitted for publication in English or
for grant applications to English speaking sources.  I would like to help
(translating and/or proof-reading) where my expertise qualifies me:
molecular biology, biochemistry, molecular genetics. I am not looking for
employment, but would like to work with individual authors. Since I
recently retired from the lab bench for health reasons, I want to stay
connected and active, and put to use the skills and knowledge I acquired
over the last 20 years. I have worked mainly in the field of plant
molecular genetics (UCLA and UCSD), with excursions into entomology
(bacculoviruses) and cancer research (in tissue culture). I speak German
fluently, and French enough to understand. For more INFO please contact me:

e-mail: hoschek@jeeves.ucsd.edu
tel.: (619) 944-4233



From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Wed Feb 08 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!vt.edu!fishgen
From: fishgen@vt.edu (Bruce  J. Turner)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: pedigree analysis software
Date: 8 Feb 1995 23:20:33 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 7
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199502090720.XAA12774@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

A graduate student in Jeff Walter's lab here is in need of a source of
pedigree analysis software for her studies of birds.  She has roughly 6000
individuals and wants to put them all in a pedigree.  Any suggestions for
public domain or commercial software that could do this would be
appreciated.



From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Wed Feb 08 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!agate!news.duke.edu!godot.cc.duq.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!bcc.ac.uk!dac159!dcurtis
From: dcurtis@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (David Curtis)
Subject: Re: LOD score too high - answers
Sender: news@ucl.ac.uk (Usenet News System)
Message-ID: <dcurtis.62.000A86F5@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 10:31:33 GMT
References:  <1995Feb3.154305.27274@news.unige.ch>
Organization: Institute of Psychiatry
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]
Lines: 22

>  To remind you, when testing a disease against two closely-linked
>(to each other) markers, using MLINK, I got:
>        1 (disease), 2  lod = 4.7
>        1, 3            lod = 2.7
>        1, 2, 3         lod = 16!

>  The consensus was (which makes perfect sense - I was simply ignorant)
>that the third value is "Ott's generalized lod score", which is based
>on the probability of ALL THREE LOCI BEING LINKED versus ALL 3 BEING
>UNLINKED. And I know that 2 of them are linked.

Sorry, I don't quite understand this. With MLINK, you generally only vary one 
recombination fraction. To test the hypothesis of all linked against none 
linked you'd have 1 - 0.0 - 2 - 0.0 - 3 against 1 - 0.5 - 2 - 0.5 - 3, which 
would mean changing two intervals simultaneously. What you wanted to test was 
1 - 0.0 - 2 - 0.0 - 3 against 1 - 0.5 - 2 - 0.0 - 3, i.e. the disease being 
linked or unlinked against the two markers tightly linked to each other. The 
mistake which might be relatively easy to make would be to test 1 - 0.0 - 2 - 
0.0 - 3 against 1 - 0.0 - 2 - 0.5 - 3. This assumes the disease and first 
marker are linked, and tests whether the second marker is linked to them. 
That's not what you did is it? Otherwise, I don't quite see how you managed to 
do what you say you did.

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Wed Feb 08 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!WATSON.HGEN.PITT.EDU!dweeks
From: dweeks@WATSON.HGEN.PITT.EDU ("Daniel E. Weeks")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Re: LOD score too high - answers
Date: 9 Feb 1995 11:59:25 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 44
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950209142317.24560A-100000@watson.hgen.pitt.edu>
References: <dcurtis.62.000A86F5@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

On Thu, 9 Feb 1995, David Curtis wrote:

> To test the hypothesis of all linked against none 
> linked you'd have 1 - 0.0 - 2 - 0.0 - 3 against 1 - 0.5 - 2 - 0.5 - 3, which 
> would mean changing two intervals simultaneously. 

   Unfortunately, this is exactly what LINKMAP does when it computes 
Ott's generalized lod score (which is described in his book).  I think 
this may be identified only as a lod score in the LRP output, but in the 
final.out text output, it is identified as Ott's generalized lod score 
(without further explanation).  LINKMAP should compute multipoint lod 
scores, but it cannot since it only does one order at a time.  

For example, if 1 is the trait locus, and our given marker map is 
2---0.05---3, then the multipoint lod score for the order 
2---0.0---1---0.05---3 requires computation of two likelihoods:

A) The likelihood under order 2---0.0---1---0.05---3
and
B) The likelihood under order 1---0.5---2---0.05---3 (i.e., with the 
trait off the map).

Thus, post-processing of LINKMAP output is required to compute valid 
multipoint lod scores.  I believe Jurg Ott distributes a utility 
program to do this.  I have one as well, which is now available in the 
file 'map.tar.Z' by anonymous ftp from watson.hgen.pitt.edu.  Please note 
that my conversion program requires that you start each group of LINKMAP 
runs with the trait locus off the marker map on the left.

I hope this helps clarify matters.

-- Dan Weeks --
________________________________
 Daniel E. Weeks, Ph.D.        
 The Wellcome Trust Centre     Department of Human Genetics   
 for Human Genetics            University of Pittsburgh        
 University of Oxford          Crabtree Hall, Room A310     
 Windmill Road                 130 DeSoto Street             
 Oxford OX3 7BN                Pittsburgh, PA 15261          
                              
 (+44) 865 742 441             (1-412) 624-3066               
 FAX: (+44) 865 742 196        FAX: (1-412) 624-3020          
 daniel.weeks@well.ox.ac.uk    dweeks@watson.hgen.pitt.edu  


From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 09 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news.cs.utah.edu!news.cc.utah.edu!corona!patrick
From: Patrick O'Neil <patrick@corona>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.bio-matrix,bionet.molbio.embldatabank,bionet.molbio.evolution,bionet.molbio.gdb,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.molbio.genome-program,bionet.molbio.hiv,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.molbio.yeast
Subject: Re: controversies & ethics
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 23:28:35 -0700
Organization: University Of Utah Computer Center
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950209231506.19239H-100000@corona>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950130115343.5258D-100000@rocky>
NNTP-Posting-Host: corona.med.utah.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950130115343.5258D-100000@rocky> 
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.ageing:1267 bionet.molbio.bio-matrix:553 bionet.molbio.embldatabank:450 bionet.molbio.evolution:2429 bionet.molbio.gdb:295 bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:543 bionet.molbio.genome-program:1178 bionet.molbio.hiv:887 bionet.molbio.rapd:972 bionet.molbio.yeast:2369



On Mon, 30 Jan 1995, Phandaal wrote:
> I've been asked to give a lecture to upper-division college students on
> the controversies and ethical considerations in producing transgenic
> organisms, especially transgenic plants.  It's been a while since I gave
> this lecture, and so I was wondering if anybody had any good examples of
> controversies or ethical considerations that I could incorporate into the 
> talk.

 I spent a year working in a plant molec bio lab that was being partially 
funded by a private company to produce a more fungal resistent 
sugarbeet.  Technically, it would be a transgenic in that a gene, VERY 
closely related to an already present gene, from Arabidopsis was/is to be 
introduced into the sugarbeet and overexpressed, thus bolstering the 
sugarbeet's fungal resistence.  I enjoyed the work very much and saw 
absolutely nothing wrong with it.  It was making use of an already 
existent defensive gene that resides in many plants and simply increasing 
its output by using an easy to maniplate gene from a common lab plant.  
This sugarbeet will allow, hopefully, less use of chemical fungicides.  
  You could argue that it will simply apply selective pressure for fungi 
to evolve resistence...but then, so does the use of fungicides or natural 
defenses.  A more resistent fungi will, conversely, select for more 
fungal-resistent plants.  This can be applied to your first point below too.

> 
> Two I can think of off-hand are:
> 
> 1) introducing insecticidal proteins (such as the Bacillus thuringiensis
> protein) into plants may create resistant insect populations (under the
> force of heavy selection pressure), which could then overrun the resistant
> plants and make worthless the efforts by conventional growers who *use* Bt
> protein as a topical pesticidal spray. 

The use of the spray itself puts selective pressure on insects to develop 
resistence.  The point is moot.

> 
> 2) altering fatty acid metabolism in oil-crops (like canola) so that they 
> produce oils found chiefly in palm and coconut could severely damage the 
> palm oil and coconut oil industries in Third World countries... thus 
> severely depressing the economies of these already struggling countries.

If business was nice, then companies would never be put out of business.  
It may be tough but I could not support artificially supporting a 
weakly-based economy by ignoring a possible economic boon here.  Any 
economy that ties itself to one commodity is *automatically* doomed to bite 
it pretty hard.  Look at Louisiana and the effects of it having placed 
all its economic eggs in the oil business basket -- the state is only now 
beginning to recover from over a decade of depressed economy and hard times.

Patrick

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 09 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news.cs.utah.edu!news.cc.utah.edu!corona!patrick
From: Patrick O'Neil <patrick@corona>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.bio-matrix,bionet.molbio.embldatabank,bionet.molbio.evolution,bionet.molbio.gdb,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.molbio.genome-program,bionet.molbio.hiv,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.molbio.yeast
Subject: Re: controversies & ethics
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 23:44:24 -0700
Organization: University Of Utah Computer Center
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950209233449.19239J-100000@corona>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950130115343.5258D-100000@rocky> <3gk3au$pdp@rebecca.albany.edu> <3gm7u9$t5e@nntp1.u.washington.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: corona.med.utah.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <3gm7u9$t5e@nntp1.u.washington.edu> 
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.ageing:1269 bionet.molbio.bio-matrix:554 bionet.molbio.embldatabank:451 bionet.molbio.evolution:2430 bionet.molbio.gdb:296 bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:544 bionet.molbio.genome-program:1179 bionet.molbio.hiv:888 bionet.molbio.rapd:973 bionet.molbio.yeast:2370



On 31 Jan 1995, Jared Roach wrote:
>         2) The human race as a whole (or national governments, or
> individuals) is slow to reach consensus on ethical issues (i.e.
> religion, abortion, the creation of new species, etc.)  Science
> should slow its pace of discovery to allow Ethics to catch up.

I could never go along with this point.  What, tell us all that we 
should quit looking at this?  Stop research concerning that?  Take up a 
new trade, like house painting?  I do and will continue to study and learn 
just as quickly as I am physically capable.  I could never say, "well, 
that result sure does point to a VERY exciting, very interesting, line of 
research that would increase my understanding of x.  Well, maybe I'll 
just cool my jets and let it go for a decade or so.  Sure don't want to 
upset those who can't handle the fast pace of scientific understanding."

In any case, it is a pointless thought since if this or that or those 
countries stopped research on x, then some other country or group would 
take it up because there would be a possible economic boon tied to it.  
If not us, then someone else.  Humans have never and will never all agree 
to the same extent on ANYTHING.  I would go to any location that would 
support what I am interested in researching, be it transgenics or gene 
therapy, etc.


From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 09 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news.cs.utah.edu!news.cc.utah.edu!corona!patrick
From: Patrick O'Neil <patrick@corona>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.bio-matrix,bionet.molbio.embldatabank,bionet.molbio.evolution,bionet.molbio.gdb,bionet.molbio.genome-program,bionet.molbio.hiv,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.molbio.yeast,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Re: controversies & ethics
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 23:52:53 -0700
Organization: University Of Utah Computer Center
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950209234533.19239K-100000@corona>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950130115343.5258D-100000@rocky> <3gk3au$pdp@rebecca.albany.edu> <3gm7u9$t5e@nntp1.u.washington.edu>
	<3gml85$fb5@rebecca.albany.edu> <MjA0jS200WBMA7T1sy@andrew.cmu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: corona.med.utah.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <MjA0jS200WBMA7T1sy@andrew.cmu.edu> 
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.ageing:1270 bionet.molbio.bio-matrix:555 bionet.molbio.embldatabank:452 bionet.molbio.evolution:2431 bionet.molbio.gdb:297 bionet.molbio.genome-program:1180 bionet.molbio.hiv:889 bionet.molbio.rapd:974 bionet.molbio.yeast:2371 bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:545



On Wed, 1 Feb 1995, Howard M. Bomze wrote:
>    Steve Bonne has been saying that there are no new ethical
> considerations for agricultural biotechnologies.  However, he has been
> missing one very important one, that is the possibility of an engineered
> gene to be transfered to a different species. 

This already happens in nature by various means, one of which is viral.  
There is no absolute genetic sanctity in nature.  As for transgenics, 
especially in plants, one tool for introducing foreign genes is 
agrobacteria.  This microbe is fully capable of vectoring interspecific 
DNA without lab manipulation.  The DNA so introduced in the lab does not 
carry any special DNA destabilizer, rather, it depends on the rather 
scattershot and low-yield natural method of homologous recombination or 
illegitimate recombination.  Another method has absolutely no danger of 
transfering a new DNA transfer method to nature:  the gene gun.  DNA of 
interest bound to microscopic gold beads and shot into cells offers 
absolutely no threat of tranfering into an uncontrollable means of 
interspecific gene transfer in the wild.

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 09 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!rutgers!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!NewsWatcher!user
From: bir1@cornell.edu (Bruce Reisch)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.software
Subject: Re: Linkage software complex trait analysis
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1995 14:39:52 -0500
Organization: Cornell University
Lines: 15
Sender: bir1@cornell.edu (Verified)
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <bir1-1002951439520001@132.236.10.52>
References: <3g3g1k$7lc@hawk.le.ac.uk> <3gbisp$n63@nic-nac.CSU.net> <dcurtis.58.000DFD7D@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk> <3h5lo1$co6@netnews.upenn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 132.236.10.52
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:547 bionet.software:11027

In article <3h5lo1$co6@netnews.upenn.edu>, tromp@sanger.bcm.tju.edu
(Gerard Tromp) wrote:

> There are packages for mapping with experimental animal crosses. One
that comes 
> to mind is S.A.G.E. , a package available from Dr. Elston at Louisiana State
> Medical Center in New Orleans. Another is MAPMAKER by Eric Lander et al., 
> available by anonymous ftp from genome.wi.mit.edu.  
> 

Also, there is a program called Map Manager 2.6.2 for the Macintosh. 
Developed by Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, Kenneth Manly,
voice 716-845-3372, internet mapmgr@mcbio.med.buffalo,edu
See their WWW page at http://mcbio.med.buffalo.edu/mapmgr.html
This program handles backcrosses, intercrosses, and recombinant inbred strains.

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 09 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!WATSON.HGEN.PITT.EDU!dweeks
From: dweeks@WATSON.HGEN.PITT.EDU ("Daniel E. Weeks")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Re: LOD score too high - answers
Date: 10 Feb 1995 06:59:52 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 15
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950210095359.25640C-100000@watson.hgen.pitt.edu>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950209142317.24560A-100000@watson.hgen.pitt.edu>

On 9 Feb 1995, Daniel E. Weeks wrote:
> > To test the hypothesis of all linked against none 
> > linked you'd have 1 - 0.0 - 2 - 0.0 - 3 against 1 - 0.5 - 2 - 0.5 - 3, which 
> > would mean changing two intervals simultaneously. 
> 
>    Unfortunately, this is exactly what LINKMAP does when it computes 
> Ott's generalized lod score (which is described in his book).  

  Opps, it is ILINK which computes Ott's generalized lod score, not MLINK or
LINKMAP.  David Curtis' discussion of MLINK was correct - MLINK does only
change one theta at a time, and, as pointed out, this may result in a 'lod
score' that is not a proper multipoint lod score because it was standardized
by the wrong likelihood. 

-- Dan Weeks --

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Sat Feb 11 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!news.ttu.edu!aurora.LaTech.edu!darwin.sura.net!maze.dpo.uab.edu!usenet
From: Mpsy0l3@uabdpo.dpo.uab.edu (Flammable)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: What is the Genome-Project?
Date: 11 Feb 1995 23:37:33 GMT
Organization: Friedman Graphix
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <3hjhnt$eae@maze.dpo.uab.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tty17.maze.ppp.uab.edu
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+

Please send me some E-Mail to Mpsy013@uabdpo.dpo.uab.edu and in it please
tell me what the Genome project is about, what it entails, who's involved,
or any other information you have availible. ANYTHING you can give me 
would be incredibly apperciated. Thank you.

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Sun Feb 12 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!uknet!bcc.ac.uk!dac159!dcurtis
From: dcurtis@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (David Curtis)
Subject: Re: LOD score too high - answers
Sender: news@ucl.ac.uk (Usenet News System)
Message-ID: <dcurtis.63.000B62B8@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 11:23:03 GMT
References: <1995Feb3.154305.27274@news.unige.ch> <dcurtis.62.000A86F5@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Organization: Institute of Psychiatry
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]
Lines: 26


>>  To remind you, when testing a disease against two closely-linked
>>(to each other) markers, using MLINK, I got:
>>        1 (disease), 2  lod = 4.7
>>        1, 3            lod = 2.7
>>        1, 2, 3         lod = 16!

>>  The consensus was (which makes perfect sense - I was simply ignorant)
>>that the third value is "Ott's generalized lod score", which is based
>>on the probability of ALL THREE LOCI BEING LINKED versus ALL 3 BEING
>>UNLINKED. And I know that 2 of them are linked.

The consensus here seems to have been quite wrong then, and you weren't 
ignorant, it's MLINK that's misleading. 

The short and simple answer is that when doing multipoints MLINK doesn't 
output a lod score (log base 10). Instead it outputs twice the natural log of 
the likelihood ratio, which is an anachronistic statistic called a location 
score. It differs from the lod score by 2ln(10), about 4.6. All talk of 
testing the wrong intervals, standardising on the wrong likelihood or getting 
"Ott's generalised lod score" is really a side issue. The real problem is that 
MLINK doesn't output what it says it outputs as a "log like difference", it 
outputs a 2ln(like) difference. My advice is to look at the raw log 
likelihoods you get and ignore the totals and what MLINK claims are the 
differences.


From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Sun Feb 12 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!TENET.EDU!dashley
From: dashley@TENET.EDU (Don Ashley)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Re: What is the Genome-Project?
Date: 12 Feb 1995 21:24:32 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 10
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9502122331.B7153-0100000@Leslie-Francis.tenet.edu>
References: <3hjhnt$eae@maze.dpo.uab.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Please include me in the same request.  Don    dashley@tenet.edu

On 11 Feb 1995, Flammable wrote:

> Please send me some E-Mail to Mpsy013@uabdpo.dpo.uab.edu and in it please
> tell me what the Genome project is about, what it entails, who's involved,
> or any other information you have availible. ANYTHING you can give me 
> would be incredibly apperciated. Thank you.
> 
> 

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Mon Feb 13 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: THE BELL CURVE
From: mike.mehta@canrem.com (Mike Mehta)
Path: biosci!rutgers!gatech!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!bmdhh222.bnr.ca!bcarh8ac.bnr.ca!bcarh189.bnr.ca!nott!torn!uunet.ca!uunet.ca!portnoy!canrem.com!mike.mehta
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <60.354.3898.0N1CFD8E@canrem.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 21:03:00 -0500
Organization: CRS Online  (Toronto, Ontario)
Lines: 34


Hello,

I am reading a book called "The Bell Curve" by Richard Hernstein and
Charles Murray.  It is a book about intelligence and class structure
in American life.  Since I have started reading this book, I have
become extremely interested in intelligence and genetics.  I was
hoping to receive as much information: opinions, facts, recent
updates, regarding these topics.  There are hundreds of questions I am
dying to ask, so to start:

-  What is intelligence defined as?  Does it have multiple
definitions?

-  What methods exist of measuring intelligence?  How accurate are
they?  Can I obtain copies of these tests or test questions?

-  Is Intelligence generally considered to be due to genetics or
environment?  What evidence is there supporting either?

-  What do you people see as the consequences of the revelation that
intelligence may differ ON AVERAGE by racial group?

-  Have scientists found an 'intelligence gene'?

-  How does the brain function to form thought?  Is it just a reaction
to various chemicals being shifted around?  If that is true, can we
accurately predict every thought of the mind?

As well, information on cases regarding tests done on identical twins,
or children and parents, etc.  would be appreciated.  I am open to any
and all comments and opinions.  Please respond,

Mike

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Mon Feb 13 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!DRUID.HSC.COLORADO.EDU!mariod
From: mariod@DRUID.HSC.COLORADO.EDU (Mario de la Pena)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Re: THE BELL CURVE
Date: 14 Feb 1995 09:48:21 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 13
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9502141042.B2217-0100000@druid>
References: <60.354.3898.0N1CFD8E@canrem.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Mike,
	About "The Bell Curve" book, I think you shoud read the comments 
about the book published in Scientific American (either December 94 or 
February 95 - I don't remember exactly) The author made a recollection of 
the shaky basis on which the book stands especially when confronted with 
the veracity of some of the key statistics in the book and its sources. I 
am pretty sure you'll find those comments very interesting for the 
interpretation of your reading.

Mario de la Pena, Ph.D.
Eleanor Roosevelt Institute for Cancer Research
Denver, CO


From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Mon Feb 13 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!news.unb.ca!coranto.ucs.mun.ca!leif!roger
From: roger@kean.ucs.mun.ca (ROGER GREEN,MEDICINE,ST.JOHN'S,NF,CAN)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Re: THE BELL CURVE
Date: 14 Feb 95 18:20:30 -0230
Organization: Memorial University. St.John's Nfld, Canada
Lines: 62
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1995Feb14.182030.1@leif>
References: <60.354.3898.0N1CFD8E@canrem.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: leif.ucs.mun.ca

In article <60.354.3898.0N1CFD8E@canrem.com>, mike.mehta@canrem.com (Mike Mehta) writes:
> Hello,
> I am reading a book called "The Bell Curve" by Richard Hernstein and
> Charles Murray.  It is a book about intelligence and class structure
> in American life.  Since I have started reading this book, I have
> become extremely interested in intelligence and genetics.  I was
> hoping to receive as much information: opinions, facts, recent
> updates, regarding these topics.  There are hundreds of questions I am
> dying to ask, so to start:
> 
> -  What is intelligence defined as?  Does it have multiple
> definitions?
	Multiple definitions. Any discussion of "intelligence" should begin 
with the definition being used. 

> -  What methods exist of measuring intelligence?  How accurate are
> they?  Can I obtain copies of these tests or test questions?
	Any number of "IQ" tests may be used as a 
measure of intelligence: not because they are particularly meaningful, but 
because "IQ", as defined in these tests, is easy to measure and fairly 
reproducible.

> -  Is Intelligence generally considered to be due to genetics or
> environment?  What evidence is there supporting either?
	You pays your money and takes your choice. I believe that if you
are talking about performance on an "IQ" test, then genetic factors 
outweigh environmental ones, perhaps by a wide margin. Be prepared for 
other opinions on this.

> -  What do you people see as the consequences of the revelation that
> intelligence may differ ON AVERAGE by racial group?
	About the same consequence as the revelation that skin colour or 
height differs, ON AVERAGE, between "racial groups". (Not sure how you define 
"racial groups"). In other words, it's hardly surprising.

> -  Have scientists found an 'intelligence gene'?
	To my knowledge, not yet. However intelligence is defined, there 
will be several genes involved (as there are in the determination of height.) 
Geneticists have not had much luck in finding genes for ANY complex trait.

> -  How does the brain function to form thought?
	I have almost no idea.

>-  Is it just a reaction to various chemicals being shifted around?
	Almost certainly.

>-  If that is true, can we accurately predict every thought of the mind?
	Not yet.  (I assume you're joking.)

> As well, information on cases regarding tests done on identical twins,
> or children and parents, etc.  would be appreciated.  I am open to any
> and all comments and opinions.  Please respond,
> 
> Mike
			__________________________

	This is probably not the right group for this kind of discussion. 
I suggest any follow-ups go to one of the other groups where discussions of 
"The Bell Curve" have been going on for some time.

Roger C. Green,	Faculty of Medicine               Phone: (709)737-6884
Memorial University , St. John's, Newfoundland    FAX  : (709)737-7010

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Mon Feb 13 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!rutgers!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!nntp.cac.washington.edu!max.u.washington.edu!wijsman
From: wijsman@max.u.washington.edu
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: RE: pedigree analysis software
Date: 14 Feb 95 09:25:23 PST
Organization: ÿÿÿÿ
Lines: 15
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1995Feb14.092523.1@max.u.washington.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: max.u.washington.edu

The only package I know of which will handle such a large dataset is
PEDPAK, written largely by & distributed by Alan Thomas, who is in
Bath, England.  I don't have any more details on his contact address,
although could find someone who does.  The package is not public domain,
& costs some significant $$, I believe.  Nothing that is being used routinely
in human genetics comes close to handling that large a number of individuals.
PEDPAK uses a marriage-node representation of pedigrees.

Ellen Wijsman

> A graduate student in Jeff Walter's lab here is in need of a source of
> pedigree analysis software for her studies of birds.  She has roughly 6000
> individuals and wants to put them all in a pedigree.  Any suggestions for
> public domain or commercial software that could do this would be
> appreciated.

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Mon Feb 13 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!TENET.EDU!dashley
From: dashley@TENET.EDU (Don Ashley)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Re: THE BELL CURVE and 'IMMORTALITY'
Date: 14 Feb 1995 04:51:29 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 46
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9502140612.G29199-0100000@Gayle-Gaston.tenet.edu>
References: <60.354.3898.0N1CFD8E@canrem.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Mike,

When the geneticists break through with telomerase manipulations and the 
aging process is arrested, the bell curve of intelligence will be harder 
to plot.

Don 

On Mon, 13 Feb 1995, Mike Mehta wrote:

> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am reading a book called "The Bell Curve" by Richard Hernstein and
> Charles Murray.  It is a book about intelligence and class structure
> in American life.  Since I have started reading this book, I have
> become extremely interested in intelligence and genetics.  I was
> hoping to receive as much information: opinions, facts, recent
> updates, regarding these topics.  There are hundreds of questions I am
> dying to ask, so to start:
> 
> -  What is intelligence defined as?  Does it have multiple
> definitions?
> 
> -  What methods exist of measuring intelligence?  How accurate are
> they?  Can I obtain copies of these tests or test questions?
> 
> -  Is Intelligence generally considered to be due to genetics or
> environment?  What evidence is there supporting either?
> 
> -  What do you people see as the consequences of the revelation that
> intelligence may differ ON AVERAGE by racial group?
> 
> -  Have scientists found an 'intelligence gene'?
> 
> -  How does the brain function to form thought?  Is it just a reaction
> to various chemicals being shifted around?  If that is true, can we
> accurately predict every thought of the mind?
> 
> As well, information on cases regarding tests done on identical twins,
> or children and parents, etc.  would be appreciated.  I am open to any
> and all comments and opinions.  Please respond,
> 
> Mike
> 
> 

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Tue Feb 14 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!ns1.faseb.org!darwin.sura.net!maze.dpo.uab.edu!usenet
From: Mpsy0l3@uabdpo.dpo.uab.edu (Flammable)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Genome Project Updates?
Date: 15 Feb 1995 02:26:34 GMT
Organization: Friedman Graphix
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <3hrooq$19v3@maze.dpo.uab.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tty5.maze.ppp.uab.edu
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+

Does anyone know of any major advances in the Genome project
in the last few years? If so would you please E-Mail them to me?
Thank You.


From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Tue Feb 14 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!world!decwrl!pa.dec.com!dibit.hsr.it!casarig
From: casarig@dibit.hsr.it (Giorgio Casari)
Message-ID: <ab6560af010210047543@[192.167.193.52]>
Subject: mac linkage software
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 19:07:39 +0100
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA15946; Mon, 13 Feb 95 10:15:29 -0800
X-Received: by pobox1.pa.dec.com; id AA11187; Mon, 13 Feb 95 10:15:23 -0800
X-Received: from dibit.hsr.it by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com (5.65/10Aug94)
	id AA28620; Mon, 13 Feb 95 10:09:36 -0800
X-Received: from [192.167.193.52] by dibit.hsr.it (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA11068; Mon, 13 Feb 1995 19:07:39 +0100
X-Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-To: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage.usenet@decwrl.dec.com
Lines: 13

If anyone knows where to find Mac software for linkage analysis, please
write me.Thanks. Giorgio

******************************************************************************
Dr Giorgio Casari
Tigem - Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine
Via Olgettina 58
20132 Milan - Italy
tel 39-2-21560201
fax 39-2-21560220
temporary e-mail: casarig@dibit.hsr.it 



From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Tue Feb 14 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!daresbury!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!ebi.ac.uk!harper
From: harper@ebi.ac.uk (Rob Harper)
Subject: RE: pedigree analysis software
Sender: news@ebi.ac.uk (Mr news)
Message-ID: <D41GLH.CuB@ebi.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 1995 11:15:17 GMT
Lines: 78
Reply-To: harper@ebi.ac.uk
References:  <1995Feb14.092523.1@max.u.washington.edu>
Organization: European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL) - UK
X-Newsreader: mxrn 6.18-16


Some information about packages that might be of interest.
Info obtained from the Biocatalogue at URL http://www.ebi.ac.uk/

 PAP

AC             BC00165
NAME           PAP
DOMAIN         Pedigree Analysis Package
DESCRIPTION    The Pedigree Analysis Package (PAP) is a set of FORTRAN 77
DESCRIPTION    programs for computing likelihoods of genetic models on 
DESCRIPTION    pedigrees.
AUTHOR         -
RT             -
ADDRESS        -
CONTACT        -
SITE           ftp anonymous corona.med.utah.edu
SITE           Directory /pub/pap/unix
SITE-CONTACT   Peter Cartwright  pc@molson.med.utah.edu
OS             UNIX
LANGUAGE       FORTRAN 77
VOLUME         -

 FASTLINK

AC             BC00109
NAME           FASTLINK
DOMAIN         Genetic Linkage software
DESCRIPTION    Faster Sequential Genetic Linkage Computations
DESCRIPTION    modified versions of the general pedigree programs of LINKAGE 5.1
AUTHOR         Bob Cottingham
RA             Cottingham R.W., Idury R.M., Schaffer A.A.;
RT             "Faster Sequential Genetic Linkage Computations.";
RL             Am. J. Hum. Genet. 53: 252-63(1993).
RX             Medline; 93304419.
ADDRESS        Department of Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine,
ADDRESS        Houston, TX 77030, USA.
CONTACT        bwc@bcm.tmc.edu
SITE           ftp anonymous gc.bcm.tmc.edu
SITE           Directory /pub/linkage
SITE-CONTACT   bwc@bcm.tmc.edu
OS             Unix
LANGUAGE       C 
VOLUME         -

 SAGE

AC             BC00104
NAME           SAGE
DOMAIN         Epidemiology
DESCRIPTION    Statistical Analysis Package for Genetic Epidemiology
DESCRIPTION    is composed of 18 programs
DESCRIPTION    AGEON : Estimating the Distribution of Age-of-Onset
DESCRIPTION    ASSOC : marker-trait Associations in Pedigree Data
DESCRIPTION    BCROSS : Genetic Hypothesus for Quantitative Data on Inbred
DESCRIPTION    strains, their F1 and Backcross(es)
DESCRIPTION    CLUSTR : Power Transformation to Obtain Normality and
DESCRIPTION    Homoscedasticity from Clustered Data
DESCRIPTION    FCOR : Family Correlations
DESCRIPTION    FSP : Family Structure Program
DESCRIPTION    LODLINK : Lod Score Linkage Analysis
DESCRIPTION    MAPLOC : Mapping a Disease-Related Trait Relative to a
DESCRIPTION    Set of Linked markers
DESCRIPTION    MAXFUN : Function maximization Subroutine
DESCRIPTION    REGC,REGD,REGTL,REGTN : Segregation Analysis Programs
DESCRIPTION    RELATE : Relationship to Proband
DESCRIPTION    SIBPAL : Sib-Pair Linkage Analysis
DESCRIPTION    DBSORT, RENUM, SPLIT : Toolkit Programs
AUTHOR         Dr. R.C. Elston
RT             -
ADDRESS        Department of Biometry and Genetics,
ADDRESS        Louisiana State University Medical Center
ADDRESS        1901 Perdido Street, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, USA
CONTACT        sage@haldne.biogen.lsumc.edu
SITE           -
SITE-CONTACT   -
OS             SunOS 4.1.x, Apple Macintosh II, PC 386,486 (MSDOS)


From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Tue Feb 14 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!pipex!uknet!comlab.ox.ac.uk!oxuniv!ayoung
From: ayoung@vax.oxford.ac.uk (Geordie +1865 740 011)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Course in analysis of multifactorial diseases
Message-ID: <1995Feb15.142252.28969@oxvaxd>
Date: 15 Feb 95 14:22:52 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAX 6620
Lines: 105

                  WELLCOME SUMMER SCHOOLS

      FOURTEENTH ADVANCED COURSE 16th - 21st July 1995

The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford 
Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7BN

       All email inquiries to: wss@umds.ac.uk.

HUMAN GENOME ANALYSIS: GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIFACTORIAL DISEASES

An intensive computer-based course aimed at scientists actively involved 
in genetic analysis of multifactorial traits.  The following topics will be 
covered:

Programme

1.	Gel analysis

Operation of GENESCAN software for defining tracks and checking size 
standards on the ABI fluorescent 373A DNA sequencer.  Including sample sheet 
set up, installation of matrix files, analysis and pre-process parameters.

2.	Genotyping

Scoring of microsatellite results using GENOTYPER and GAS software, 
including setting up of macros files, export of data, allele binning and 
format conversions.

3.	Linkage

Introduction to basic concepts of linkage analysis, in particular, those 
related to non-Mendelian diseases.

4.	Sibpair Analysis

Comparison of identity-by-descent, identity-by-state and maximum 
likelihood methods of affected sib-pair analysis.  Analysis of quantitative 
traits.

5.	Lodscore analysis

Use of LINKAGE program to calculate likelihoods for general pedigrees, 
including construction of locus linkage maps, error checking and analysis of 
marker locus linked to disease.

6.	Affected Relative Methods

General non-parametric tests aimed at detecting linkage by examining 
correlation between the affected members of a pedigree.

7.	Associated Tests

Use of tests for linkage disequilibrium between markers and disease, 
construction and analysis of haplotypes.

Teaching will take the form of lectures by invited speakers, informal 
tutorials, hands-on computer sessions and analysis of disease family data 
sets.  There will also be an opportunity to analyse and discuss 
participants' own data sets.

Course Instructors

SUMIT BHATTICHARYYA, HEATHER CORDELL, JUNE DAVIES, SIW DANIELS, TONY 
MERRIMAN, LYNN PRITCHARD, PETER REED, JOHN TODD, JOE TERWILLIGER, MARGARET 
TOWN, DAN WEEKS,  ALAN YOUNG.

Confirmed speakers include:

MIKE BOEHNKE (Ann Arbor), ARAVINDA CHAKRAVARTI (Case Western), DOUG EASTON 
(Sutton), MARTIN FARRALL (Oxford), MARK LATHROP (Oxford),  MARGARET 
PERICAK-VANCE (Duke).

Participants

Applicants should be scientists at an advanced level of research 
(post-doctoral or equivalent).  Documentation verifying that the applicant 
is actively engaged in a linkage or family-based association study 
(animal/human) must be provided with the application, as well as evidence of 
access to a fluorescence-based automated genotyping system.  The course is 
subsidised by the Wellcome Trust for scientists based in academic 
institutions anywhere in the world.  This is a residential course, without 
exception, and there is a charge of 350 pounds Sterling towards board and
lodging.

Applications

There are no formal application forms, but applicants should send a hard 
copy of their full CV together with a 300 word outline of their research 
plans and supporting documentation, to Dr Pelin Faik, Course Co-ordinator, 
Division of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, UMDS, Guy's Campus, London 
Bridge SE1 9RT.

Tel:  0171 403 6998
Fax:  0171 407 5281
Email: wss@umds.ac.uk.

	Closing date for applications is 14th April 1995
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ___
    /   \   /                 |    /      Alan Young @ uk.ac.ox.vax
   /____/  /  ___    __       |___/
  /    /  /  /   |  /  |         /           "The bigger they are,
 /     \_/\__\__/|_/  /_________/               the harder they fall on you."

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Tue Feb 14 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!panix!zip.eecs.umich.edu!umn.edu!lenti.med.umn.edu!dean
From: dean@lenti.med.umn.edu (Dean Flanders)
Subject: GAS and CEPH Database
Message-ID: <D4278M.ro@news.cis.umn.edu>
Sender: news@news.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration)
Nntp-Posting-Host: lenti.med.umn.edu
Organization: University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 1995 20:52:07 GMT
Lines: 23

Where can I get GAS, which is an affected pedigree member program I 
believe.  In addition does anyone know where I can get the Unix version 
of the CEPH database, I can only find the PC version.  I believe the Unix 
version is Sybase orientated.

Thanks!

Dean

=========================================================================
Division of Genetics and Metabolism   I
University of Minnesota               I
Box 485 UMHC                          I    "If all you have is a hammer,
Harvard Street at East River Road     I     you tend to look at every
Minneapolis, MN  55455                I     problem as a nail."
                                      I
Voice (612) 625-5628                  I                      -Maslow
Fax (612) 624-6645                    I
Email dean@gene.med.umn.edu           I
==========================================================================




From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Wed Feb 15 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.bio-matrix,bionet.molbio.embldatabank,bionet.molbio.evolution,bionet.molbio.gdb,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.molbio.genome-program,bionet.molbio.hiv,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.molbio.yeast
Path: biosci!daresbury!trane.uninett.no!ugle.unit.no!news.uit.no!pclab12.hibo.no!FG1
From: FG1@stud.hibo.no
Subject: Re: controversies & ethics
Sender: news@news.uit.no (News admin.)
Message-ID: <FG1.1.2F432A23@stud.hibo.no>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1995 10:34:11 GMT
Lines: 58
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950130115343.5258D-100000@rocky> <Pine.SOL.3.91.950209231506.19239H-100000@corona>
Organization: Bodoe College
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.ageing:1331 bionet.molbio.bio-matrix:557 bionet.molbio.embldatabank:457 bionet.molbio.evolution:2449 bionet.molbio.gdb:301 bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:562 bionet.molbio.genome-program:1199 bionet.molbio.hiv:914 bionet.molbio.rapd:987 bionet.molbio.yeast:2405

In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.950209231506.19239H-100000@corona> Patrick O'Neil <patrick@corona> writes:
>From: Patrick O'Neil <patrick@corona>
>Subject: Re: controversies & ethics
>Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 23:28:35 -0700



>On Mon, 30 Jan 1995, Phandaal wrote:
>> I've been asked to give a lecture to upper-division college students on
>> the controversies and ethical considerations in producing transgenic
>> organisms, especially transgenic plants.  It's been a while since I gave
>> this lecture, and so I was wondering if anybody had any good examples of
>> controversies or ethical considerations that I could incorporate into the 
>> talk.

> I spent a year working in a plant molec bio lab that was being partially 
>funded by a private company to produce a more fungal resistent 
>sugarbeet.  Technically, it would be a transgenic in that a gene, VERY 
>closely related to an already present gene, from Arabidopsis was/is to be 
>introduced into the sugarbeet and overexpressed, thus bolstering the 
>sugarbeet's fungal resistence.  I enjoyed the work very much and saw 
>absolutely nothing wrong with it.  It was making use of an already 
>existent defensive gene that resides in many plants and simply increasing 
>its output by using an easy to maniplate gene from a common lab plant.  
>This sugarbeet will allow, hopefully, less use of chemical fungicides.  
>  You could argue that it will simply apply selective pressure for fungi 
>to evolve resistence...but then, so does the use of fungicides or natural 
>defenses.  A more resistent fungi will, conversely, select for more 
>fungal-resistent plants.  This can be applied to your first point below too.

>> 
>> Two I can think of off-hand are:
>> 
>> 1) introducing insecticidal proteins (such as the Bacillus thuringiensis
>> protein) into plants may create resistant insect populations (under the
>> force of heavy selection pressure), which could then overrun the resistant
>> plants and make worthless the efforts by conventional growers who *use* Bt
>> protein as a topical pesticidal spray. 

>The use of the spray itself puts selective pressure on insects to develop 
>resistence.  The point is moot.

>> 
>> 2) altering fatty acid metabolism in oil-crops (like canola) so that they 
>> produce oils found chiefly in palm and coconut could severely damage the 
>> palm oil and coconut oil industries in Third World countries... thus 
>> severely depressing the economies of these already struggling countries.

>If business was nice, then companies would never be put out of business.  
>It may be tough but I could not support artificially supporting a 
>weakly-based economy by ignoring a possible economic boon here.  Any 
>economy that ties itself to one commodity is *automatically* doomed to bite 
>it pretty hard.  Look at Louisiana and the effects of it having placed 
>all its economic eggs in the oil business basket -- the state is only now 
>beginning to recover from over a decade of depressed economy and hard times.

>Patrick


From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Wed Feb 15 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!internet!biosci!not-for-mail
From: biohelp (BIOSCI Administrator)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: UNSUBSCRIBING, BIOSCI ARCHIVES, ADDRESS DATABASE & BIOSCI FAQ
Date: 16 Feb 1995 02:00:23 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 338
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199502161000.CAA03250@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net


Four important items follow: How to cancel e-mail subscriptions to
BIOSCI newsgroups, BIOSCI archive searching, the BIOSCI FAQ, and the
BIOSCI User Address Directory form.  If you have not yet listed
yourself in our BIOSCI user directory, please take a few minutes to
complete and return the form below.  If your personal information has
changed since you listed yourself, please send us a complete new
updated form.  We can not make manual revisions to existing entries.

				Sincerely,

				Dave Kristofferson
				BIOSCI/bionet Manager

				biosci-help@net.bio.net



	 **** How to cancel a BIOSCI e-mail subscription ****

If you want to cancel your e-mail subscription to this group, 
PLEASE DO NOT POST YOUR UNSUBSCRIBE REQUEST TO THE NEWSGROUP ADDRESS
(NOR REPLY TO A MESSAGE POSTED TO THE NEWSGROUP)!!!

This would send your request to all of the readers of the newsgroup,
but it might still not be seen by the BIOSCI staff - thus you would
annoy many people and possibly not accomplish your goal anyway.

IF YOU ARE LOCATED IN THE AMERICAS OR PACIFIC RIM COUNTRIES, please
send a message to

biosci@net.bio.net

Instructions on how to subscribe/unsubscribe will be returned
automatically, so the contents of your message do not matter.

IF YOU ARE LOCATED IN EUROPE, AFRICA OR CENTRAL ASIA, please send a
message to

MXT@dl.ac.uk

containing the word 

help

in the body of the message to retrieve e-mail server instructions.
Any text placed on the Subject: line of your message will be ignored,
so be sure to put the "help" command in the body of the message.

If you need personal assistance, a BIOSCI staff member can be
contacted at either of the following addresses.  Please contact the
address designated for your location.

Support Address                      Location
---------------                      --------
biosci@daresbury.ac.uk               Europe, Africa, and Central Asia
biosci-help@net.bio.net              Americas and the Pacific Rim


		 **** SEARCHING BIOSCI ARCHIVES ****

The easiest way to search the BIOSCI archives is to use gopher
software and connect over the Internet to net.bio.net, the U.S. BIOSCI
computer.  We maintain three indexes which are searchable from the
main gopher menu on net.bio.net: (1) an index of all BIOSCI postings;
(2) an index of individual journal article references from the Table
of Contents postings on the BIO-JOURNALS newsgroup; and (3) an index
of BIOSCI users including regular mail and e-mail addresses, phone/FAX
numbers, research interests, and newsgroup participation.

E-mail users can search the BIOSCI archives by using our waismail
e-mail server.  For instructions send the message

help

to waismail@net.bio.net.  Leave the Subject: line blank (anything
entered on the Subject: line is ignored).

WAIS software can also be used to search the archives as described in
the BIOSCI FAQ (see below).

Finally, the BIOSCI archive files are accessible by anonymous FTP to
net.bio.net [134.172.2.69] in the directory pub/BIOSCI.


       **** BIOSCI FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ) SHEET ****

New users of BIOSCI/bionet may want to read the "Frequently Asked
Questions" or "FAQ" sheet for BIOSCI.  The FAQ provides details on how
to participate in these forums and is available for anonymous FTP from
net.bio.net [134.172.2.69] in pub/BIOSCI/doc/biosci.FAQ or for
retrieval by gopher to net.bio.net, port 70.  It may also be requested
by sending the command

info faq

in the body of an e-mail message to the Internet address
biosci-server@net.bio.net.  Please do not enter the info faq command
on the Subject: line of your message since the e-mail server ignores
text on the Subject: line.

The FAQ is also posted on the first of each month to the newsgroup
BIONEWS/bionet.announce immediately following the posting of the
BIOSCI information sheet.


	       **** BIOSCI USER ADDRESS DIRECTORY ****

Please take this opportunity to add your name and address information
to the BIOSCI User Address Database if you have not already done so.

Below is the address form that we would like each reader of the
BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups to complete and return if you would like to
be listed in our database.  The database serves as a directory that
enables biologists, who are currently using (or even just reading) the
BIOSCI newsgroups, to look up e-mail addresses and other information
about our users.

The address database is reindexed nightly for WAIS, waismail, and
gopher access.  If you have access to gopher, connect to net.bio.net
to search the database.  If you have access to WAIS, please use our
WAIS source biologists-addresses.src.  If you are not on the Internet,
please use our waismail server (send the word "help" to
waismail@net.bio.net to get instructions; any text on the Subject:
line of your message will be ignored, so put the help command in the
body of the mail message.).

Please carefully follow the instructions for completing the form
below and return it to either of the following two addresses
(whichever is more convenient for you).  Thanks in advance for taking
the time to complete and return the form.

Addresses for returning forms         Location        Network
-----------------------------         --------        -------
biovote@net.bio.net                   U.S.A.          Internet/BITNET
biovote@daresbury.ac.uk               U.K.            JANET


	     MAKING SURE THAT YOUR INFORMATION IS CURRENT

This notice will be mailed bimonthly to each newsgroup.  You should
check your database entry from time-to-time to see if your address
information is still up-to-date.


		  Using Gopher to complete the form
                  ---------------------------------

If you don't want to use a text editor, you can also use Dan
Jacobson's gopher site to fill out the address database form as
follows.  Otherwise skip this section on gopher and proceed to the
instructions for filling out the form below.

> To add yourself to the database just point your
> gopher client at merlot.gdb.org and select the following:
> 
> -->  14. Searching For Biologists/
> 
>  -->  9.  E-mail Addresses of Biosci-Bionet Users/
> 
>   -->  1.  Add (or Correct) Your Address to the BIOSCI User Address
> Data..
> 
> 
> And fill out the form.

or Rob Harper's gopher site in Europe as follows:

> Europeans can point their gopher client at gopher.csc.fi and add their
> information to the database. All entries will be mailed directly to
> Dave for incorporation in a wais source.
> 
> The path to the questionare is as follows.
> 
> 
> 6.  Information in English/
> 
>     5.  Scientific and other topics/
> 
>         1.  Finnish EMBnet BioBox/
> 
>             9.  FAQ Files/
> 
>                 5.  Bionauts Address Database (questionaire) <TEL>
> 



	    IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY

Please enter all responses after the : on each line, leaving one (1)
blank space after the : (i.e., before the start of your text).

Please do NOT extend your responses past the end of each line (80
characters).

PLEASE DO NOT alter any of the field identifiers such as "first name: ". 
If you have nothing to enter after a field identifier, PLEASE LEAVE IT
- do not delete it even if there is no data on the line in question.

Several lines are provided at the end of the form for comments, but,
please adhere to the line length restriction.

On the date: line, please enter the date in the DD-MM-YY format, e.g.,
15-05-93 for 15 May 1993.  This line will tell others when the
information was last updated.  Please be sure to include the 0's for
single digit days or months, e.g., 15-05-93, not 15-5-93.

Note that the "e-mail network: " line below is for specifying, e.g.,
"Internet," "BITNET," "EARN," "JANET," or whatever other network that
your computer may be on.

If you are uncertain about any field, please feel free to leave it
blank, but please DO NOT DELETE the field identifier from the form!

In the first field below, "New information or Update ...", please
enter "N" if this is the first time that you have registered in the
directory or "U" if you are correcting a listing that you sent to us
previously.

The comment: lines may be used for anything that you like but PLEASE
DO NOT DELETE THEM FROM THE FORM OR ALTER THEM.  One suggested use is
to list the names of the newsgroups in which you participate.  Please
use the MAILING LIST name (see below - the latest version of the list
can be requested from biosci@net.bio.net) instead of the USENET name
even if you don't participate by e-mail.  WAIS might get confused by
the periods in the USENET names.  This allows one to retrieve via WAIS
or waismail the list of participants in a particular group.

For example:

comment: ARABIDOPSIS PLANT-BIOLOGY BIONEWS

On the comment: lines
use these names below ---- NOT the USENET names below

MAILING LIST NAME          USENET Newsgroup Name
-----------------          ---------------------
ACEDB-SOFT                 bionet.software.acedb
AGEING                     bionet.molbio.ageing
AGROFORESTRY               bionet.agroforestry
ARABIDOPSIS                bionet.genome.arabidopsis
ASCB                       bionet.prof-society.ascb
BIOCAN                     bionet.prof-society.cfbs
BIOFORUM                   bionet.general
BIO-INFORMATION-THEORY     bionet.info-theory
BIONAUTS                   bionet.users.addresses
BIONEWS                    bionet.announce
BIO-JOURNALS               bionet.journals.contents
BIO-MATRIX                 bionet.molbio.bio-matrix
BIOPHYSICAL-SOCIETY        bionet.prof-society.biophysics
BIOPHYSICS                 bionet.biophysics
BIO-SOFTWARE               bionet.software
BIOTHERMOKINETICS          bionet.metabolic-reg
BIO-WWW                    bionet.software.www
CARDIOVASCULAR-RESEARCH    bionet.biology.cardiovascular
CELEGANS                   bionet.celegans
CELL-BIOLOGY               bionet.cellbiol
CHLAMYDOMONAS              bionet.chlamydomonas
CHROMOSOMES                bionet.genome.chromosomes
COMPUTATIONAL-BIOLOGY      bionet.biology.computational
CSM                        bionet.prof-society.csm
CYTONET                    bionet.cellbiol.cytonet
DROSOPHILA                 bionet.drosophila
EMBL-DATABANK              bionet.molbio.embldatabank
EMF-BIO                    bionet.emf-bio
EMPLOYMENT                 bionet.jobs
EMPLOYMENT-WANTED          bionet.jobs.wanted
FASEB                      bionet.prof-society.faseb
GDB                        bionet.molbio.gdb
GENBANK-BB                 bionet.molbio.genbank
GENETIC-LINKAGE            bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
GRASSES-SCIENCE            bionet.biology.grasses
HIV-MOLECULAR-BIOLOGY      bionet.molbio.hiv
HUMAN-GENOME-PROGRAM       bionet.molbio.genome-program
IMMUNOLOGY                 bionet.immunology
INFO-GCG                   bionet.software.gcg
JOURNAL-NOTES              bionet.journals.note
METHODS-AND-REAGENTS       bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts
MICROBIOLOGY               bionet.microbiology
MOLECULAR-EVOLUTION        bionet.molbio.evolution
MOLECULAR-MODELLING        bionet.molec-model
MOLLUSC-MOLECULAR-NEWS     bionet.molbio.molluscs
MYCOLOGY                   bionet.mycology
NEUROSCIENCE               bionet.neuroscience
N2-FIXATION                bionet.biology.n2-fixation
PARASITOLOGY               bionet.parasitology
PHOTOSYNTHESIS             bionet.photosynthesis
PLANT-BIOLOGY              bionet.plants
POPULATION-BIOLOGY         bionet.population-bio
PROTEIN-ANALYSIS           bionet.molbio.proteins
PROTEIN-CRYSTALLOGRAPHY    bionet.xtallography
PROTISTA                   bionet.protista
RAPD                       bionet.molbio.rapd
SCIENCE-RESOURCES          bionet.sci-resources
STADEN                     bionet.software.staden
STRUCTURAL-NMR             bionet.structural-nmr
TROPICAL-BIOLOGY           bionet.biology.tropical
URODELES                   bionet.organisms.urodeles
VIROLOGY                   bionet.virology
WOMEN-IN-BIOLOGY           bionet.women-in-bio
YEAST                      bionet.molbio.yeast
ZBRAFISH                   bionet.organisms.zebrafish

Listing newsgroups on the comment: line is optional, of course.

Thanks again for your cooperation!



--------------- please cut here and return portion below ---------------

New information or Update to old record (enter N or U): 
date (DD-MM-YY): 
first name: 
middle initial: 
family name: 
job title: 
e-mail address: 
e-mail network: 
phone number: 
FAX number: 
institution: 
address1: 
address2: 
address3: 
city: 
state/province: 
country: 
postal code: 
research interest: 
research interest: 
comment: 
comment: 
comment: 
comment: 
comment: 


From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Wed Feb 15 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!daresbury!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!ebi.ac.uk!tome
From: tome@ebi.ac.uk (Patricia Rodriguez-Tome)
Subject: Re: GAS and CEPH Database
Sender: news@ebi.ac.uk (Mr news)
Message-ID: <D43EEz.Cvq@ebi.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1995 12:23:22 GMT
Lines: 90
Reply-To: tome@ebi.ac.uk (Patricia Rodriguez-Tome)
References:  <D4278M.ro@news.cis.umn.edu>
Organization: European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL) - UK
X-Newsreader: mxrn 6.18-16


Hello,

In article <D4278M.ro@news.cis.umn.edu>, dean@lenti.med.umn.edu (Dean Flanders) writes:
>Where can I get GAS, which is an affected pedigree member program I 
>believe. 

You can find this information in the BioCatalog maintained at the EBI.
(URL http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biocat/biocat.html)
Here is the corresponding entry :

AC             BC00116
NAME           GAS
DOMAIN         Genetic tools
DESCRIPTION    This package provides facilities for reading, writing,
DESCRIPTION    sectioning and performing statistical analyses on 
DESCRIPTION    phenotypic and genotypic data.
AUTHOR         Alan Young
RT             -
ADDRESS        Department of medicine at Oxford University (UK)
CONTACT        ayoung@vax.oxford.ac.uk
SITE           ftp anonymous well.ox.ac.uk
SITE           Directory /pub/genetics/gas
SITE-CONTACT   -
OS             DOS,SUN/Solaris, SunOS,DecAlpha(OSF1), Dec5000(ULTRIX)
LANGUAGE       C
VOLUME         -
REQUIRES       -

 In addition does anyone know where I can get the Unix version 
>of the CEPH database, I can only find the PC version.  I believe the Unix 
>version is Sybase orientated.

There is a Unix (Sybase) version of the database, but I don't know exactly
how it is distributed (I am enquiring).
The contact for the ceph database is : cephdbm@cephb.fr
The ascii files for the ceph db can be found at the ceph ftp server:
ftp.cephb.fr
directory : /pub/ceph_genotype_db/ceph_db/UNIX

here is part of the readme file
>
     -    ceph_db/UNIX/asc/ contains text files that represent all the
          concatenated markers and their genotypes for each chromosome.
          Read the ceph_db/UNIX/asc/Readme file to know what each line 
          of these files represents.
          To decompress these files use the following command:

                 uncompress chrii.asc.Z

              or uncompress *.asc.Z  ( to decompress several ...asc.Z files)

     -    In ceph_db/UNIX/link/ you will find for all markers in DB 7.1 
          the files in LINKAGE format. There is a chrii.pdi (for pedin.dat)
          and chrii.dti (for datain.dat) for each chromosome. To decompress
          these files, use the uncompress command.

                uncompress chrii.pdi.Z chrii.dti

     -    ceph_db/UNIX/mkr/ contains the list of all the markers in DB 7.1.
          This list is useful because it lets you know which marker number
          corresponds to which marker name. To decompress
          these files, use the uncompress command.

                 uncompress mk71.ii.Z


     -    In ceph_db/UNIX/lods/ you have the lod score table files 
          (lod scores for all marker pairs) for each chromosome.
          To decompress them use the uncompress command.

                 uncompress chrii.lods.Z



>Thanks!
>
>Dean
>

Regards,

Pat
-- 
=======================================================================
Dr. Patricia Rodriguez-Tome		| Email:tome@ebi.ac.uk
EBI - European Bioinformatics Institute	| URL:	http://www.ebi.ac.uk
Hinxton Hall, Hinxton			| Tel:	+44 (0)223 494 413
Cambridge CB10 1RQ, UK			| Fax:	+44 (0)223 494 468
========================================================================

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 16 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!uknet!bcc.ac.uk!dac159!dcurtis
From: dcurtis@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (David Curtis)
Subject: Re: THE BELL CURVE
Sender: news@ucl.ac.uk (Usenet News System)
Message-ID: <dcurtis.69.000E1156@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 1995 14:03:58 GMT
References:  <60.354.3898.0N1CFD8E@canrem.com>
Organization: Institute of Psychiatry
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]
Lines: 37


>-  What is intelligence defined as?  Does it have multiple
>definitions?

As a general factor underlying performance on tests, or just the performance 
on the tests.

>-  What methods exist of measuring intelligence?  How accurate are
>they?  Can I obtain copies of these tests or test questions?

There are a number of standardised tests which have reasonable reliability and 
which are published and generally available.

>-  Is Intelligence generally considered to be due to genetics or
>environment?  What evidence is there supporting either?

There is good evidence for a contribution of both. It would be extremely naive 
to think that either completely determines intelligence. One kind of evidence 
comes from comparing identical to non-identical twins - the identical ones 
score more closely than non-identical.

>-  What do you people see as the consequences of the revelation that
>intelligence may differ ON AVERAGE by racial group?

Most experts believe this is unlikely to be true, and certainly that there is 
not sufficient evidence currently to say that it is true.

>-  Have scientists found an 'intelligence gene'?

No.

>-  How does the brain function to form thought?  Is it just a reaction
>to various chemicals being shifted around?  If that is true, can we
>accurately predict every thought of the mind?

The system is far to complex to envisage being able to do anything like that.


From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Sat Feb 18 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!agate!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!nic-nac.CSU.net!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!olivea!news.bu.edu!gw1.att.com!princeton!hedgehog.Princeton.EDU!news
From: "Lee M. Silver" <LSILVER@MOLBIOL.PRINCETON.EDU>
Subject: Re: RE: pedigree analysis software
Message-ID: <1995Feb17.154022.15427@Princeton.EDU>
Originator: news@hedgehog.Princeton.EDU
Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
Nntp-Posting-Host: molecular17.princeton.edu
Organization: Princeton University
References:  <1995Feb14.092523.1@max.u.washington.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 1995 15:40:22 GMT
Lines: 18


> 
> > A graduate student in Jeff Walter's lab here is in need of a source of
> > pedigree analysis software for her studies of birds.  She has roughly 6000
> > individuals and wants to put them all in a pedigree.  Any suggestions for
> > public domain or commercial software that could do this would be
> > appreciated.

If you (or anybody else) would like information on a Macintosh 
software package that is able to keep track of the inter-relationships
 between animals in a large pedigree, please send me an
E-mail message (LSILVER@Molbiol.princeton.edu) or a FAX 
(1-609-258-1703 or 1-609-258-3345).  The software package that I have
developed (and is now commercially available at a modest cost)
 is specifically designed for the purpose of tracking pedigrees rather
than do linkage analysis (for which there are numerous other packages).

Happy breeding

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Sun Feb 19 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!EU.net!uknet!bcc.ac.uk!dac159!dcurtis
From: dcurtis@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (David Curtis)
Subject: Re: THE BELL CURVE
Sender: news@ucl.ac.uk (Usenet News System)
Message-ID: <dcurtis.71.000B0E2A@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 1995 11:03:14 GMT
References: <60.354.3898.0N1CFD8E@canrem.com> <1995Feb14.182030.1@leif>
Organization: Institute of Psychiatry
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]
Lines: 10

>> -  What do you people see as the consequences of the revelation that
>> intelligence may differ ON AVERAGE by racial group?
>        About the same consequence as the revelation that skin colour or 
>height differs, ON AVERAGE, between "racial groups". (Not sure how you define 
>"racial groups"). In other words, it's hardly surprising.

Just to say that I, and I believe many others, vehemently disagree that 
intelligence differs on average between racial groups. It is certainly absurd 
to suggest that the magnitude of the effect (if it exists at all) is at all
comparable with the way that skin colour differs between races. 

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Mon Feb 20 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!galaxy.ucr.edu!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!news.duke.edu!godot.cc.duq.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!comlab.ox.ac.uk!oxuniv!ayoung
From: ayoung@vax.oxford.ac.uk (Geordie +1865 740 011)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: course in genetic analysis
Message-ID: <1995Feb21.144756.29103@oxvaxd>
Date: 21 Feb 95 14:47:56 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAX 6620
Lines: 105

                  WELLCOME SUMMER SCHOOLS

      FOURTEENTH ADVANCED COURSE 16th - 21st July 1995

The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford 
Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7BN

       All email inquiries to: wss@umds.ac.uk.

HUMAN GENOME ANALYSIS: GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIFACTORIAL DISEASES

An intensive computer-based course aimed at scientists actively involved 
in genetic analysis of multifactorial traits.  The following topics will be 
covered:

Programme

1.	Gel analysis

Operation of GENESCAN software for defining tracks and checking size 
standards on the ABI fluorescent 373A DNA sequencer.  Including sample sheet 
set up, installation of matrix files, analysis and pre-process parameters.

2.	Genotyping

Scoring of microsatellite results using GENOTYPER and GAS software, 
including setting up of macros files, export of data, allele binning and 
format conversions.

3.	Linkage

Introduction to basic concepts of linkage analysis, in particular, those 
related to non-Mendelian diseases.

4.	Sibpair Analysis

Comparison of identity-by-descent, identity-by-state and maximum 
likelihood methods of affected sib-pair analysis.  Analysis of quantitative 
traits.

5.	Lodscore analysis

Use of LINKAGE program to calculate likelihoods for general pedigrees, 
including construction of locus linkage maps, error checking and analysis of 
marker locus linked to disease.

6.	Affected Relative Methods

General non-parametric tests aimed at detecting linkage by examining 
correlation between the affected members of a pedigree.

7.	Associated Tests

Use of tests for linkage disequilibrium between markers and disease, 
construction and analysis of haplotypes.

Teaching will take the form of lectures by invited speakers, informal 
tutorials, hands-on computer sessions and analysis of disease family data 
sets.  There will also be an opportunity to analyse and discuss 
participants' own data sets.

Course Instructors

SUMIT BHATTICHARYYA, HEATHER CORDELL, JUNE DAVIES, SIW DANIELS, TONY 
MERRIMAN, LYNN PRITCHARD, PETER REED, JOHN TODD, JOE TERWILLIGER, MARGARET 
TOWN, DAN WEEKS,  ALAN YOUNG.

Confirmed speakers include:

MIKE BOEHNKE (Ann Arbor), ARAVINDA CHAKRAVARTI (Case Western), DOUG EASTON 
(Sutton), MARTIN FARRALL (Oxford), MARK LATHROP (Oxford),  MARGARET 
PERICAK-VANCE (Duke).

Participants

Applicants should be scientists at an advanced level of research 
(post-doctoral or equivalent).  Documentation verifying that the applicant 
is actively engaged in a linkage or family-based association study 
(animal/human) must be provided with the application, as well as evidence of 
access to a fluorescence-based automated genotyping system.  The course is 
subsidised by the Wellcome Trust for scientists based in academic 
institutions anywhere in the world.  This is a residential course, without 
exception, and there is a charge of 350 pounds Sterling towards board and
lodging.

Applications

There are no formal application forms, but applicants should send a hard 
copy of their full CV together with a 300 word outline of their research 
plans and supporting documentation, to Dr Pelin Faik, Course Co-ordinator, 
Division of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, UMDS, Guy's Campus, London 
Bridge SE1 9RT.

Tel:  0171 403 6998
Fax:  0171 407 5281
Email: wss@umds.ac.uk.

	Closing date for applications is 14th April 1995
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ___
    /   \   /                 |    /      Alan Young @ uk.ac.ox.vax
   /____/  /  ___    __       |___/
  /    /  /  /   |  /  |         /           "The bigger they are,
 /     \_/\__\__/|_/  /_________/               the harder they fall on you."

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Tue Feb 21 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!WELCHLINK.WELCH.JHU.EDU!dmeyers
From: dmeyers@WELCHLINK.WELCH.JHU.EDU (Deborah Meyers Phd)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: subscribe
Date: 22 Feb 1995 12:40:41 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 5
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <9502222039.AA05767@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Please add my address to the subscription list for this bulletin board.
Thanks,
Deborah Meyers
dmeyers@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu


From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Tue Feb 21 22:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Path: biosci!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news.cs.utah.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!pipex!uknet!festival!leeds.ac.uk!news
From: gen6ads@sun.leeds.ac.uk (A D Stewart)
Subject: Re: What is the Genome-Project?
Message-ID: <1995Feb22.093704.23648@leeds.ac.uk>
Reply-To: gen6ads@sun.leeds.ac.uk
Organization: University of Leeds, U.K.
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 09:37:03 +0000 (GMT)
References: <3hjhnt$eae@maze.dpo.uab.edu>
Lines: 33

In article eae@maze.dpo.uab.edu, Mpsy0l3@uabdpo.dpo.uab.edu (Flammable) writes:
>Please send me some E-Mail to Mpsy013@uabdpo.dpo.uab.edu and in it please
>tell me what the Genome project is about, what it entails, who's involved,
>or any other information you have availible. ANYTHING you can give me 
>would be incredibly apperciated. Thank you.


This is a common request from high schools all over.  It would be nice if
teachers would teach ...

To be more positive, an easy starting point is on the WWW:

http://www.gdb.org/Dan/DOE/intro.html

This outlines the USA HGP - of course there are significant programmes
in other countries too, including France, Germany, Britain ...

Best wishes,

Alistair Stewart

a.d.stewart@leeds.ac.uk

Department of Genetics
University of Leeds
Leeds LS2 9JT
England

FAX   (+44) 113 244 1175
PHONE (+44) 233 3108




From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Tue Feb 21 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!TEOSINTE.AGRON.MISSOURI.EDU!byrne
From: byrne@TEOSINTE.AGRON.MISSOURI.EDU (Patrick Byrne)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Journal of Quantitative Trait Loci
Date: 21 Feb 1995 16:04:57 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 154
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199502220003.SAA02692@teosinte.agron.missouri.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

	 ANNOUNCING THE JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI

The Journal of Quantitative Trait Loci (JQTL), sponsored by the Crop
Science Society of America (CSSA), will provide a peer-reviewed, fully
electronic forum in which articles dealing with the theory and practice
of QTL analysis will be published.  The publication format will
facilitate links to related publications and databases, and will permit
the inclusion of more complete analyses than is generally feasible in
bound media.  Improved publication speed, easy and inexpensive access,
and flexibility should make JQTL a preferred journal for the
publication of papers dealing with the analysis of the inheritance of
quantitative traits.

PURPOSE OF THE JOURNAL
1. JQTL will publish articles relevant to the analysis, manipulation,
   and use of genes modifying quantitative characters in any species.  
   We are defining quantitative characters as those for which the
   phenotypic variation among genotypes is continuous and cannot be
   separated into discrete classes.  This definition of QTL makes no
   assumptions regarding the number of genes controlling such characters, 
   nor the magnitude of genetic effects.  When appropriate, authors will 
   be encouraged to include datasets upon which their analyses depend.

2. JQTL will serve as a medium for announcing, describing, and storing
   new software developed for QTL analysis.

3. JQTL will publish secondary analyses of primary datasets when such 
   analyses prove novel and illuminating.

4. JQTL will publish worthy editorial commentaries and review articles as
   space and interest warrant.

GENERAL STANDARDS
Papers will be submitted either electronically or on diskette. They
will consist of ASCII text, with .gif files holding images.  Papers
will be written in general accordance with style standards of CROP
SCIENCE (Publications Handbook and Style Manual, 1988, American Society
of Agronomy, Madison, WI).  Papers will be submitted to the Editor, who
will then request review by two Technical Editors.

INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN ARTICLES SUBMITTED
All articles should contain a) title, b) affiliation, phone number,
and e-mail addresses of all authors, c) abstract briefly summarizing 
the work, d) introduction, methods, results and discussion sections 
in accordance with ASA guidelines, and e) literature cited. 

For all articles containing datasets authors must supply a data
dictionary (description of data fields) and a description of how the
data was gathered.

Software submission:  All software described in a JQTL article should
be, if at all possible, available for JQTL readers.  Ideally, an
anonymous ftp site would already exist from which software could be
downloaded.  If this is not the case, and the software was developed by
the authors, then the software should be uploaded to
hordeum.oscs.montana.edu.  All executable software should be
accompanied by source code, if available, as well as a user manual.
Acceptable formats are

Unix: a compressed tar file (compressed with either the compress program 
   or by gzip)
DOS/Windows: a zip file
MacIntosh: a StuffIt archive (.sit) file

ORIGINALITY AND NOVELTY
To be considered for publication, neither data nor analyses should have
been published previously in any peer-reviewed journal, book, or
bulletin.  While updates (i.e., second year datasets or datasets
gathered in new environments using lines already characterized) may be
considered for publication, they will generally be accepted as
appendices to prior articles.  New analyses of previously published
datasets will be accepted if they provide novel insights into the
data.

PEER REVIEW AND COMMENT
Each submitted article will be reviewed by two scientists familiar with
the area of research.  They will be asked to review the manuscript for
compliance with the above criteria, to judge suitability of the article
for inclusion in JQTL, and to write brief critiques of the manuscript
to be returned to the author.  The editors will attempt to evaluate the
performance of submitted software.

SUBMISSION PROTOCOL
Articles may consist of text, tables, and data sets (all in ASCII
format) and figures (in .gif format).  Other acceptable formats may be
announced in the future.  There are no size limitations.

Prior to submission, authors should e-mail the Editor (current address:
blake@hordeum.oscs.montana.edu) to request a submission number.  Files
should then be renamed to include the submission number (e.g.,
text##.asc, fig1##.gif, fig2##.gif, tabl##.asc, data##.asc, etc.).
This will avoid the problem of one submission over-writing another.

Submit files via ftp to hordeum.oscs.montana.edu
Login as jqtlsubm 
Password: your e-mail address.
 
The Editor will scan each submitted article for gross compliance with
standards, then will send all appropriate articles to two Technical
Editors.  They will review the paper, suggest modifications if
necessary, and return the files to the Editor, who will in turn send
them to the author as files appended to a letter describing the
Technical Editors' recommendations.  For manuscripts dealing with
re-analysis of previously published data, the Editor will invite the
corresponding author of the original publication to submit a review.
This will provide the original authors an avenue for direct feedback
prior to publication of the new analyses.

After receiving the Technical Editors' recommendations, the author may
revise (if necessary) and resubmit the paper with "r" appended to each
file name (e.g., text##r.asc, fig1##r.gif, tabl##r.asc).  Each accepted
manuscript will then be sent to CSSA headquarters for HTML formatting,
and thence to the U.S. National Agricultural Library for immediate
publication.  JQTL will be continuously updated with new articles.

JOURNAL ACCESS
Beginning April 1, 1995, JQTL will be available for public on-line
access from the National Agricultural Library via World Wide Web at

		http://probe.nalusda.gov:8000/ 

under the heading Newsletters, Journals, and Other Publications.  

No charge will be levied for publication or for journal access during
1995, although nominal fees may be assessed at a later date.  JQTL will
be indexed in the AGRICOLA bibliographic database and by other
biological indexing services.

JOURNAL ANNUAL
By the end of the first year of publication we hope to have the
capacity to make annual CDs of the journal available for a nominal
fee.

JQTL Editor:  Thomas Blake, Montana State University

JQTL Technical Editors:
Jim Anderson, North Dakota State University
Doug Bigwood, USDA, National Agricultural Library
Cynthia Bottema, Waite Institute (Australia)
Pat Byrne, USDA, Agricultural Research Service
Rebecca Doerge, Cornell University
Jon Geadelmann, Holden's Foundation Seeds, Inc.
Dave Matthews, Cornell University
Phil McClean, North Dakota State University
Laura Oberthur, Montana State University
Andrew Paterson, Texas A&M University
Mark Sorrells, Cornell University

CSSA Editor-in-chief:  P. Stephen Baenziger, University of Nebraska

CSSA Board of Directors:  R.C. Shearman, President
        		  A.B. Maunder, President-Elect
        		  V.B. Cardwell, Past President
        		  R.F. Barnes, Executive Vice President

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Tue Feb 21 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!WELCHLINK.WELCH.JHU.EDU!fmcm
From: fmcm@WELCHLINK.WELCH.JHU.EDU (Francis McMahon)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: subscribe
Date: 22 Feb 1995 12:04:49 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 4
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950222150245.28503A-100000@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Please add my address to the subscription list for this bulletin board.
Thanks,
Francis McMahon
fmcm@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Wed Feb 22 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!NS.UNIVET.HU!pkabai
From: pkabai@NS.UNIVET.HU (Kabai Peter)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Re: pedigree analysis software
Date: 23 Feb 1995 02:58:44 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 22
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9502221321.E2957-0100000@ns.univet.hu>
References: <199502090720.XAA12774@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

To Jeff Walter!
Hi, you may wish to contact Dr. Joseph K. Kovach at
the Menninger Foundation. He has run a genetic experiment 
on quail for decades and developed a program to trace
anything back to any generation.
His e-mail address is: 72073.3147@compuserve.com
Good luck,
Peter Kabai,
Budapest, Hungary

On 8 Feb 1995 fishgen@vt.edu wrote:

> 
> 
> ----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> A graduate student in Jeff Walter's lab here is in need of a source of
> pedigree analysis software for her studies of birds.  She has roughly 6000
> individuals and wants to put them all in a pedigree.  Any suggestions for
> public domain or commercial software that could do this would be
> appreciated.
> 
> 

From owner-gene-linkage@net.bio.net Thu Feb 23 22:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: bryan6@ix.netcom.com (Bryan Thornberg)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.gene-linkage
Subject: Re: DNA/Electrophoresis...I Would Like Some Input
Date: 24 Feb 1995 00:31:14 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 13
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3ij9ci$g14@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com>
References: <3ij94h$fvq@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-pit2-19.ix.netcom.com

In <3ij94h$fvq@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com> bryan6@ix.netcom.com (Bryan 
Thornberg) writes: 

>
>I am currently in the process of putting a college course onto the 
>Internet relating to electrphoresis . This will be a hands-on course to 
>allow students to see DNA (fingerprinting), proteins, lipoproteins, and 
>specific unique features and benefits of the gels themselves. I would 
>like some additional input on what could be added t