From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Fri Jan 02 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!CPCUG.ORG!winfield
From: winfield@CPCUG.ORG
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: cops are on the way pinhead
Date: 3 Jan 1998 06:22:40 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 25
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199801031421.JAA26564@cpcug.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

thot you might want to know, i have alerted ATT card services and Worldnet
about your pitiful scam
cheers and have an unhappy new year


At 02:58 AM 1/2/98 -0800, hell@hell.com wrote:
>X-Newsreader: SgK9MsHtZEcuZIUQ
>
>
>Ok, you can get money posted to your Visa, mastercard, or directly into
your bank account by going the the following web address.  When you go there
you will see a line on the new user sign--up that says "if a friend sent
you, put their e-mail address here"  Now if you put this e-mail address
(Insanity1@worldnet.att.net)there, we BOTH will get a dollar bonus.  So go
to http://cybergold.com    and REMEMBER USE this E-mail address under the
Who referred you? section: "Insanity1@worldnet.att.net"
>
>-----------------------------------------------------
>Broaden your exposure on the Internet
>Get your free trial Bulk Email strip/send software
>Send requests to:  mf_mf@hotmail.com
>
>
>


From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Tue Jan 06 22:00:00 1998
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!nntp.texas.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!world!wware-nospam
From: wware-nospam@world.std.com (Will Ware)
Subject: PSF file format
Message-ID: <EMF38t.AEE@world.std.com>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 14:07:41 GMT
Lines: 47

I have been starting to get acquainted with the NAMD modeling package,
and I hope somebody patient will be willing to answer what are probably
some very basic questions. I see that in the sample data for NAMD,
there are four files (alanin (a NAMD script), alanin.pdb, alanin.params,
and alanin.psf). I am clear on the first three files, and I can understand
most of what's going on with the psf file, but there are a few things in
it that I don't understand. Here is a short segment of it:

      66 !NATOM
       1 MAIN 1    ACE  CA   CH3E   0.000000E+00   15.0350           0
       2 MAIN 1    ACE  C    C      0.450000       12.0110           0
       3 MAIN 1    ACE  O    O     -0.450000       15.9994           0
       4 MAIN 2    ALA  N    NH1   -0.350000       14.0067           0
       5 MAIN 2    ALA  H    H      0.250000       1.00800           0
       6 MAIN 2    ALA  CA   CH1E   0.100000       13.0190           0
       7 MAIN 2    ALA  CB   CH3E   0.000000E+00   15.0350           0
        etcetera

It's clear that the numbers over here ---------------/\  are masses, and
I can see that the CA and CB notations are used to represent small clumps
of carbons and hydrogens. What are ----/\  these numbers? My best guess
is that they are fractional electric charges due to electron imbalances in
covalent bonds, have I got that right? And if so, would I be correct in
guessing that they are fractions of a proton charge?

Later in the file, there are a couple of sections for "donors" and
"acceptors". I'm guessing this is probably a really dumb question, but
what is being donated and accepted? Donors always seem to be hydrogens
and nitrogens, and acceptors seem to be lone carbons and oxygens. I've
done a little reading about molecular mechanics modeling and I'm not
clear what acceptors and donors are in this context, and how they are
involved with modeled interatomic forces.

My last question is, where does the PSF file come from? It looks like it
is derived from the PDB file. I can imagine a program that reads in the
PDB file, figures out bonds based on interatomic distances, and then
enumerates which bond, angle, dihedral, and improper energy terms are
needed to model it, along with the other stuff in the file. If that's
the case, where do I find the software to generate the PSF file? It
doesn't seem to have come with the NAMD program.

Thanks for any answers anybody can provide for these questions.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
   People say that everyone has a few skeletons in their closet.  Not me.
   Well, not yet anyway.  I mean, the bodies are still decomposing.
Will Ware		email: wware[at]world[dot]std[dot]com

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Wed Jan 07 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!ais.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!iafrica.com!uct.uni.net.za!csir.uni.net.za!news.up.ac.za!biomac.up.ac.za!user
From: fourie@scientia.up.ac.za (Fourie Joubert)
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model,bionet.software
Subject: sybdb script in DOCK?
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 1998 13:06:12 +0200
Organization: University of Pretoria
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <fourie-0801981306120001@biomac.up.ac.za>
NNTP-Posting-Host: biomac.up.ac.za
Xref: biosci bionet.molec-model:1977 bionet.software:20277

Hi

Does anyone know of an update for the sybdb script in DOCK4.0 that
works with Sybyl 6.2 or 6.3's SPL?

Thanks!

Fourie Joubert
fourie@scientia.up.ac.za

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Wed Jan 07 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsxfer3.itd.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!peerfeed.ncal.verio.net!nntp2.cerf.net!nntp3.cerf.net!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!news.scripps.edu!not-for-mail
From: Don Bashford <bashford@gage.scripps.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: Re: PSF file format
Date: 08 Jan 1998 13:43:59 -0800
Organization: The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <rooh1mmyjk.fsf@gage.scripps.edu>
References: <EMF38t.AEE@world.std.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gage.scripps.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.2

I'm more of a CHARMM person than a NAMD person, but these two programs
have the PSF in common, so I can answer your questions.

You are correct about the electric charges, as well as the other
guesses you made about the PSF snippet you posted.  

"Donors" and "acceptors" refer to hydrogen bonds.  Some of the older
molecular mechanics empirical functions used explicit H-bonding terms,
but in the 80s there was a move toward dropping these in favor charges
and van der Waals terms with parameters tuned to reproduce H-bonding
effects.  Even so, many molecular mechanics programs retain the
capability of explicit hydrogen bonding for purposes like counting up
H-bonds.

PSF stands for Protein Structure File.  You seem to be pretty clear
about the sort of information it contains, so I won't explain that,
but your guess about how it is generated is probably not correct.
The CHARMM program (from the Karplus group at Harvard Chem. Dept.)
generates a PSF after first reading a Residue Topology File (RTF) and
then the protein sequence.  The RTF has bond-connectivity and charge
information for all the amino-acid residue types, as well as
information about how conntectivity and so forth change when you link
them together into a peptide chain or make other covalent
modifications like a Cys-Cys crosslink or protonation of a
carboxylate.  This information, in combination with the desired
residue sequence, and perhaps some directives to make other covalent
modifications, is sufficient to allow construction of the PSF without
reading any coordinates.  The X-PLOR program (from Axel Brunger of
Yale) which is closely related to CHARMM also generates PSF files, but
in a slightly different format than CHARMM.

Some molecular mechanics programs don't generate their own PSFs
because it is a complicated thing to program.  Instead, they rely on a
program like CHARMM or X-PLOR to do it for them.  I don't know whether
NAMD is one of these, but I think that some of the older programs from
the Schulten group (NAMD's origin) did use externally generated PSFs.

Donald Bashford
The Scripps Research Institute


From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Thu Jan 08 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!206.246.194.8!newsxfer.visi.net!nntp.texas.net!nntp.flash.net!news.mira.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!newshost.carno.net.au!torda
From: Andrew.Torda@anu.edu.au
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model,bionet.info-theory
Subject: Post-doc in computational chemistry, Canberra, Australia with Andrew Torda
Date: 9 Jan 1998 05:58:21 GMT
Organization: Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University
Lines: 69
Sender: Andrew.Torda@anu.edu.au
Message-ID: <694e9t$ddk$1@clarion.carno.net.au>
Reply-To: Andrew.Torda@anu.edu.au
NNTP-Posting-Host: 150.203.35.129
Originator: torda@rsc.anu.edu.au
Xref: biosci bionet.molec-model:1979 bionet.info-theory:5996

POST DOCTORAL POSITION
Computational Chemistry
in The Research School of Chemistry, Canberra, Australia
with Andrew Torda
Available immediately.

The research group of Andrew Torda is oriented towards
biomolecular calculation and simulation. We are working in
areas such as low-resolution (protein fold recognition) force
fields, refinement of experimental structures using MD
simulation, mixing knowledge-based force fields with
experimental data and combinatorial algorithms for protein
sequence optimisation.

All the projects in the group involve coding and development -
not just applications.  It would be an advantage to have a
reasonable knowledge of data structures and algorithms and
programming experience in a civilized language (not fortran).

Possible projects would be centred around some new algorithms
for aligning amino acid sequences to structures, based on the
force fields we have developed. These might include some
entertaining ideas such as quasi-Newtonian dynamics in amusing
spaces.

Projects are negotiable.

Salary: more than $40,963 - $43,834 per annum (the rates just
increased a week ago).
Grants are provided towards travel and removal.  Positions are
initially for two years with a possible extension to a third
year. There is a housing office to help find accommodation.

The Research School of Chemistry is part of the Institute of
Advanced Studies which runs special research schools in
parallel to the normal teaching schools. There are no
undergraduate teaching duties. The university is in the centre
of Canberra (the nation's capital).

Given the research orientation of the school, there is a
lively academic environment. We have close contacts with the
school's other theoretical groups in statistical mechanics,
polymer theory, quantum chemistry and chemical physics. From
the point of view of experimental groups, we maintain close
ties to the school's NMR, X-ray crystallography and molecular
biology groups.

Anyone interested in the Torda group should look at
  http://www.rsc.anu.edu.au/~torda
That also contains a pointer to a page of recent publications.

Anyone interested should contact me directly
(Andrew.Torda@anu.edu.au).

The closing date for applications will be March 3 1998.
The administrative procedure is that, if you are interested,
you are sent an official application (by slow mail).
Applicants then have to fill this out and mail it back (again
by slow mail).
The official forms will include a request for comments from
three referees.


There is an old advertisement from a previous school-wide job
offer at
  http://www.rsc.anu.edu.au/RSC/AcademicPositions/RSC_Academic_Positions.html
and read under "Postdoctoral Fellowships".

Andrew Torda

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Sat Jan 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!nntp.kreonet.re.kr!news.maxwell.syr.edu!ais.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!ks.uiuc.edu!dalke
From: dalke@ks.uiuc.edu (Andrew Dalke)
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: Re: PSF file format
Date: 11 Jan 1998 09:19:05 GMT
Organization: TB BI
Lines: 33
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <69a2q9$80h$1@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>
References: <EMF38t.AEE@world.std.com> <rooh1mmyjk.fsf@gage.scripps.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ophelia.ks.uiuc.edu


  Don Bashford <bashford@gage.scripps.edu> pretty much explained
everything, but I want to fill in some minor details.

  The PSF file used by NAMD comes from XPLOR, which is a variation of
the PSF format of CHARMM's.  The NAMD developers (of which I was one)
decided to leave the complications to XPLOR, because it is a hard
problem.  We chose XPLOR because that's what we had in-house.

  Will Ware <wware@world.std.com> asked how to generate a PSF file.
The only way I can suggest to do it is get a copy of XPLOR (or of
CHARMM and write a conversion script; it is a pretty simple
translation).  This isn't a satisfactory answer, but I know of no
freely available program that will do this.  Hint to anyone reading
this;  many people would thank you if you wrote one!

  We were not able to find a good description of the PSF format; we
had to discover it from reverse engineering.  I still don't know what
the last column of the ATOM line describes:

      66 !NATOM
       1 MAIN 1    ACE  CA   CH3E   0.000000E+00   15.0350           0
                                                        This one  ---^

Will also asked a few questions about the h-bond donor/acceptor lines.
For NAMD, those are ignored because the CHARMM force field no longer
depends on it.  Plus, reverse engineering that section of the code was
nasty.

						Andrew
						dalke@mag.com
---
Not speaking for the Molecular Applications Group.

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Sat Jan 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsgate.duke.edu!solaris.cc.vt.edu!newsrelay.netins.net!nntp.kreonet.re.kr!xfer.kren.nm.kr!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!atl.bellsouth.net!news4.atl.bellsouth.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: isp@fcc.gov (concerned user)
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: test
Message-ID: <34ba4810.3316420@news.atl.bellsouth.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 1
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 22:30:34 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: host-209-138-17-170.atl.bellsouth.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 17:30:34 EST



From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Sun Jan 11 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-backup-east.sprintlink.net!news-in-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!199.125.85.9!news.mv.net!newspump.wustl.edu!newsreader.wustl.edu!not-for-mail
From: reece@whoville.wustl.edu
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: RASMOL: linux patch for 2.6beta
Date: 12 Jan 1998 08:40:12 -0600
Organization: Biophysics & Biochemistry, Washington University, St. Louis, USA
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <82k9c5oiwj.fsf@whoville.wustl.edu>
Reply-To: Reece Kimball Hart <reece@dasher.wustl.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: whoville.wustl.edu
X-Attribution: Reece
X-URL: <URL:http://dasher.wustl.edu/~reece/>
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

This patch is for RasMol 2.6beta on linux systems.  It has no effect in
other environments.  It corrects the following compilation errors:
  rasmol.c: In function `FetchCharacter':
  rasmol.c:491: `WaitSet' has an incomplete type
  rasmol.c:497: warning: passing arg 2 of `select' ...
  rasmol.c:497: warning: passing arg 3 of `select' ...
  rasmol.c:497: warning: passing arg 4 of `select' ...
  rasmol.c: At top level:
  rasmol.c:112: storage size of `OrigWaitSet' isn't known
  rasmol.c:113: storage size of `WaitSet' isn't known

The patch is available at 
  http://dasher.wustl.edu/~reece/src/RasMol2.6b-linux-01.patch.gz
  ftp://dasher.wustl.edu/pub/reece/src/RasMol2.6b-linux-01.patch.gz

- -- 
Reece Hart, http://dasher.wustl.edu/~reece/
Do not send unsolicited bulk email.  Boycott companies which do so.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBNLlMskxUVHHReKr5AQGydgP9HK/GGm9A28jYbN5fDk6Ox/WWuF5UO/Ce
rUrZYPgcYcmWjkl9zQMUfErYOSlCN+Vnj1M+qtyBKCU1ji88Qs9Hy1bh339E9+HF
s2837ySCToPw+la/3Yp8btwcVUI48BtPdIXPgrXnqqH5yh9t1EvmOWji/XbmVI1y
6OGEwtLB23Y=
=n8kW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Sun Jan 11 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-backup-east.sprintlink.net!news-in-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!199.125.85.9!news.mv.net!newspump.wustl.edu!newsreader.wustl.edu!not-for-mail
From: reece@whoville.wustl.edu
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: RASMOL: spaceorb patch for 2.6beta
Date: 12 Jan 1998 08:41:18 -0600
Organization: Biophysics & Biochemistry, Washington University, St. Louis, USA
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <82iurpoiup.fsf@whoville.wustl.edu>
Reply-To: Reece Kimball Hart <reece@dasher.wustl.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: whoville.wustl.edu
X-Attribution: Reece
X-URL: <URL:http://dasher.wustl.edu/~reece/>
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

This patch adds SpaceOrb360 support to RasMol 2.6beta.  This patch has
only been tested with Linux; compatibility reports and patches for other
systems are appreciated. 

The SpaceOrb is a 6 degree of freedom joystick.  It looks like a baseball
mounted on a short shaft; the baseball rotates ±20° or so and translates
about ±5mm from rest.  See http://www.spaceorb.com.  Thanks to John Stone
<j.stone@acm.org> for orb.[ch].

The patch is available at 
  http://dasher.wustl.edu/~reece/src/RasMol2.6b-spaceorb-01.patch.gz
  ftp://dasher.wustl.edu/pub/reece/src/RasMol2.6b-spaceorb-01.patch.gz

- -- 
Reece Hart, http://dasher.wustl.edu/~reece/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBNLlS1UxUVHHReKr5AQGfIgP/dr+SRTsRWAakjP1so8BmxoeWK3gTBVGQ
gWU9fRiCYz1lE/lLVExULQOfRN34vSQt3nGp2OkrAbAr645xAP89qJiD82QeY5SH
dCs3EwcSmJtYffxz1yGVXxdKSLizcEA9fM7QuMweRta8c1WnnrtPReub82PnZ2tM
22HTQqbelKw=
=Al3k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Sun Jan 11 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!REMOVE.THIS.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de!fuellen
From: fuellen@REMOVE.THIS.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de (Georg Fuellen)
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: Distance Training in the Biosciences, a 5-minute Questionaire
Date: 12 Jan 1998 15:11:12 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 40
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199801122311.AAA26694@salbei.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Reply-To: fuellen@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

(apologies for crossposting)

Dear Madam or Sir,

Biology and medicine as of today demand more and more skills
in Bioinformatics. Since University curricula do not yet
satisfy this need, a group of Bioinformatics researchers at
the University of Bielefeld plans to establish a training
program filling this gap.

The planned courses consist of modules designed and conducted
by distinguished researchers and lecturers. Each module covers
a special topic and spans one month, each week including 4
hours self-study of hypertext material and 2 hours discussion
with a lecturer in a 'virtual classroom' or in your company or
academic institution.

We would like to ask you to complete the questionnaire at

http://oleander.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE:8080/cgi-bin/e2

to help us evaluate the actual demand.

Thank you for your help !

Yours faithfully,
The DisTrain planning commitee.

Christian Bueschking
Georg Fuellen
Chris Schleiermacher
Alexander Sczyrba
Prof. Robert Giegerich (academic advisor)

========
P.S. We hope to sustain our free offerings (on an entry level, like the
VSNS Biocomputing Courses we did in 1995 and 1996, see
http://www.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/bcd/welcome.html) by offering more
advanced courses for a fee. If you're interested in future offerings,
please visit http://www.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/bcd/plans.html.

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Mon Jan 12 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!MS.CC.NTU.EDU.TW!r5447003
From: r5447003@MS.CC.NTU.EDU.TW (Ling)
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: Cavity Volume of Enzyme Active Site
Date: 13 Jan 1998 01:49:14 -0800
Organization: Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Acadmia Sinica
Lines: 9
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <349337B6.167E@ms.cc.ntu.edu.tw>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Dear Netters:
	
	I am studying an enzyme with a gorge-like active site, which can be
bound by substrates or inhibitors. Can anyone suggest programs to
measure the volume of cavity ? Any suggestions are appreciated.



	Y. L. Luo

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Tue Jan 13 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!howland.erols.net!surfnet.nl!ruu.nl!not-for-mail
From: "Jurgen F. Doreleijers" <jurgen@nmr.chem.ruu.nl>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: Re: Cavity Volume of Enzyme Active Site
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 11:28:58 +0000
Organization: NMR spectroscopy; Utrecht University; The Netherlands
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <34BCA17A.41C6@nmr.chem.ruu.nl>
References: <349337B6.167E@ms.cc.ntu.edu.tw>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mule.chem.ruu.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP22)
To: Ling <r5447003@MS.CC.NTU.EDU.TW>

Try:
http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/~roman/surfnet/surfnet.html
http://www.sander.embl-heidelberg.de/whatif/chap31.html

Hope it helps,
Jurgen
-- 
    Drs Jurgen F. Doreleijers
    NMR spectroscopy, Utrecht University,  The Netherlands
    mailto:jurgen@nmr.chem.ruu.nl
    http://www-nmr.chem.ruu.nl/users/jurgen/jurgen.html

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Tue Jan 13 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!141.211.144.13!newsxfer3.itd.umich.edu!news.eecs.umich.edu!newshub.tc.umn.edu!newsstand.tc.umn.edu!usenet
From: "Alan J. Robinson" <robin073@tc.umn.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: Protein Folding
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 98 07:27:42 CST
Organization: University of Minnesota
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <41125.robin073@tc.umn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pub-18-c-167.dialup.umn.edu
X-Minuet-Version: Minuet1.0_Beta_18A
X-POPMail-Charset: English

The Ramachandran plot shows the allowable values for the phi and psi 
angles at each alpha carbon in a protein chain.

What puzzles me is that there are 3 distinct, unconnected areas on the 
plot, for right and left handed helices, and for beta sheets.  All 
other regions are claimed to be sterically impossible.  But this would 
imply that smooth variation of phi and psi during folding may be 
impossible, because the random coil values would all presumably be 
somewhere in the beta sheet region, but some residues would need to 
move to the right and left hand alpha helix regions, moving through 
disallowed "no man's land" values.

Obviously there are assumptions built into this whole model which 
are invalid, but I'm not sure where the problem lies.  Any 
suggestions, please!  (The Ramachandran plot would make more sense if 
the allowed regions were merely preferred regions - energetically 
favorable.)

Alan J. Robinson
robin073@tc.umn.edu


From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Tue Jan 13 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!feed1.news.luth.se!luth.se!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!not-for-mail
From: Jaap Heringa <jhering@nimr.mrc.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: PhD Studentship Available at NIMR, London
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 15:47:34 +0000
Organization: MRC
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <34BCDE16.67F710B0@nimr.mrc.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: serine.nimr.mrc.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.2 IP22)

A three-year Predoctoral MRC-funded Fellowship is available to
UK-Citizens in
the Division of Mathematical Biology, National Institute for
Medical Research (NIMR), Mill Hill, London. Head of the Division
is Dr Willie Taylor.

The following is a short outline of the project:


               PROTEIN STRUCTURAL DOMAINS AND REPEATS;
     ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION FROM SEQUENCE INFORMATION ALONE

The recognition of domains in protein structures is an important
prerequisite for areas in protein science such as NMR-based
structural elucidation and fold recognition. A number of empirical
observations render domain prediction from only sequence information
feasible, e.g., (i) domain interfaces show a.a. compositions
intermediate to those of core and surface regions, (ii) domain
linker regions display distinct compositions and (iii) domains in
many proteins are (distant) repeats of a same basic sequence stretch.
The project will embark on analysing existing databanks of protein
domains and use the information to devise sequence profiles against
which query sequences can be matched: A newly developed sensitive
protein segment detection method SEGS by Willie Taylor will be of great
use at this stage. Of help also will be the sensitive repeat detection
method REPRO (see Heringa & Taylor, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7:416-421,

1997).  All above information will be implemented in a computer method
aimed at delineating domain boundaries in protein sequences.

For more information, contact
Dr Jaap Heringa
Division of Mathematical Biology
National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR)
The Ridgeway, Mill Hill,
London NW7 1AA, U.K.

Tel.: +44 181 959 3666 ext. 2293
Fax : +44 181 913 8545
Email: jaap.heringa@nimr.mrc.ac.uk
WWW :  http://mathbio.nimr.mrc.ac.uk


From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Tue Jan 13 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!not-for-mail
From: Tom Chou <tc208@damtp.cam.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: Pore-molecule binding constants?
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 11:53:41 +0000
Organization: DAMTP, University of Cambridge, UK.
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <34BCA745.167E@damtp.cam.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: declaim.amtp.cam.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; OSF1 V4.0 alpha)

Dear molecular modelers:


I am looking for some numbers. 
I would like to know what is the averaged
energy (sum of interactions) of a single
water molecule in bulk at STP relative to a
typical, isolated water molecule inside a
model (eg Gramicidin, etc) single-file, or
nearly single-file pore. Ie, are pore
interior attractive (energetically) to a
water molecule relative to bulk 
(where H-bonding occurs?)? Are the
energy differences large compared to kT?

How about the same for a small ion such as Na+?

Any specific example would be useful.

Does anyone know of references?


Cheers,

Tom Chou
DAMTP
University of Cambridge
Cambridge CB3 9EW
ENGLAND

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Wed Jan 14 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!newsfeed.wli.net!feed.newsreader.com!portc03.blue.aol.com!newstf02.news.aol.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!audrey02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: squick2653@aol.com (SQuick2653)
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: J.D. Hanawalt Powder Diffraction Award Nominations
Date: 15 Jan 1998 20:45:59 GMT
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <19980115204500.PAA24619@ladder03.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder03.news.aol.com
X-Admin: news@aol.com
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com

International Centre for Diffraction Data - www.icdd.com
J.D. Hanawalt Powder Diffraction Award Nominations


The International Centre for Diffraction Data is seeking nominees for the 1998
J.D. Hanawalt Powder Diffraction Award. The award is presented every three
years for an important, recent contribution to the field of powder diffraction.
 The award consists of a citation and a cash gift of $1,000. The award
recipient is expected to submit an abstract and present a paper on the work
being recognized at an appropriate Powder Diffraction / Crystallographic
Meeting. Recipient's travel expenses to the meeting will be provided. Work
eligible for consideration must have been published after 1 January 1990.  The
selection committee welcomes suggestions, nominations, and documentation of
accomplishments for possible recipients through 15 February 1998. 
       
Contact:  Camden R. Hubbard  - hubbardcr@ornl.gov
               Chairman Hanawalt Award Selection Committee 
               c/o International Centre for Diffraction Data 
               12 Campus Boulevard 
               Newtown Square, PA 19073-3273, U.S.A. 

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Thu Jan 15 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!usenet
From: "David F. Green" <dfgreen@lms.mit.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: Re: Protein Folding
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 09:01:16 -0500
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <34BE16AC.41C6@lms.mit.edu>
References: <41125.robin073@tc.umn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mycroft.lms.mit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP22)

Alan J. Robinson wrote:

> suggestions, please!  (The Ramachandran plot would make more sense if
> the allowed regions were merely preferred regions - energetically
> favorable.)
> 

That's exactly what they are!  You can think of a Ramachandran plot has
being a slice through a 3-D plot - the "allowed" regions, being areas of
low energy.  The relative energies of various regions of the
"disallowed" region differ between amino acids, with glycine generally
having the lowest energy disallowed region.  If you look at a
Ramachandran plot showing the positions of amino acids in a real protein
(e.g. Voet and Voet, "Biochemistry" 2nd ed. figure 7.8, Matthews and van
Holde, "Biochemistry" 2nd ed. figure 6.10 ) you will see that in most
proteins, there are amino acids with lie in "disallowed" regions of the
Ramachandran plot.

It's good that you posted this question - a lot of students have trouble
understanding exactly what a Ramachandran plot means, and why some amino
acids are allowed in the "disallowed" regions.  You seem to have a good
understanding of the concepts.  Good luck in your studies!

-- 
************************************************
David F. Green
Department of Chemistry
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, MA 02139

E-mail: dfgreen@lms.mit.edu
Phone: (617) 228-6229
************************************************

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Thu Jan 15 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!nntp.kreonet.re.kr!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.nacamar.de!newsfeed.eerie.fr!jussieu.fr!not-for-mail
From: Pierre Tuffery <tuffery@urbb.jussieu.fr>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: XmMol 3.1 release
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 10:13:55 +0000
Organization: INSERM U155, Centre de Bioinformatique, Universite Paris 7
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <34BF32E3.42B@urbb.jussieu.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: jabiru.urbb.jussieu.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/780)

This is to announce the release of XmMol 3.1, a desktop tool
for molecular visualization.
The distribution is now made via the web instead of the
ftp server: http://duc.urbb.jussieu.fr/XmMol.html

===========================================================
What is new in XmMol 3.1


- Much enhanced interface with Raster3D and MolScript to reach
 a quick and simple preparation of cartoons including
different representations.
- The possibility to manage files including different molecular
types (DNA, Proteins, ...).
- The possibility to have different representation types at the same
time for fragments of a same file (a consequence of the previous point).
- Enhanced documentation (2 postscript manuals included).
- New delegates but also deep modification of some commands that
will need an adaptation of the delegates used with the previous
versions.
- Enhanced ablity for non PseudoColor displays.

This was done, as for previous versions, with the aim to keep XmMol a
desktop tool easy to use, that should allow 'ad lib' colouring, atom
display and rendering selection.

===========================================================

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Thu Jan 15 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!news.ohsu.edu!not-for-mail
From: Matt Jones <jonesmat@ohsu.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: Hydration Energy of Single Amino Acids
Date: 16 Jan 1998 17:07:21 GMT
Organization: Vollum Institute
Lines: 12
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <69o449$5sb$1@fremont.ohsu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.53.99.48
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Nuntius 2.0.4_68K
X-XXDate: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 17:14:47 GMT

Hi all,

Can someone please give me a reference on the hydration energy of amino
acids in solution, not incorporated into proteins? I have a paper by
Beveridge and colleagues from several years ago, modelling the hydration
of glycine zwitterion. However, I need to know what sorts of range exists
and whether smaller amino acids are more or less hydrated than larger
ones. 

Thanks,

Matt Jones

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Sun Jan 18 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!131.103.1.114!news1.chicago.iagnet.net!iagnet.net!mr.net!newshub.tc.umn.edu!newsstand.tc.umn.edu!usenet
From: "Alan J. Robinson" <robin073@tc.umn.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: Re: Protein Folding
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 98 13:35:56 CST
Organization: University of Minnesota
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <61238.robin073@tc.umn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pub-20-b-152.dialup.umn.edu
X-Minuet-Version: Minuet1.0_Beta_18A
X-POPMail-Charset: English

I would like to thank all those who replied to my post about the 
signficance of the Ramachandran plot and whether it is consistent 
with the folding process.

I haven't had time to fully research this, but I'm now led to 
believe that Ramachandran's original figure was based on a simplified 
computer model of a polypeptide, with equal values for phi and for psi 
at each consecutive residue.  This more or less corresponds to the 
interior of secondary structure in native folded proteins.  Thus the 
Ramachandran plot is roughly what secondary structure is sterically 
possible in folded proteins, even before hydrogen bonding takes 
place.  

Real proteins are obviously more complex than this in several 
different ways, so that the values of phi and psi observed in practice 
don't always fall within the regions shown on the plot, and certainly 
don't constrain the folding process itself in any direct way (though 
obviosuly constrained by steric considerations too.)

Alan J. Robinson
robin073@tc.umn.edu


From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Mon Jan 19 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!GATE.SINICA.EDU.TW!ccchuang
From: ccchuang@GATE.SINICA.EDU.TW (Chyh-chong Chuang)
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: grasp, how to? (1)
Date: 19 Jan 1998 18:19:53 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 29
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.980120095412.4803A-100000@gate>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net


Dear Grasp experts:

	I am a new grasp user. I hope to produce two kinds of 
representation of my molecules in grasp. I had tried, but I still don't 
get the way. 
	I have two different protein structures superimposed. 
	
	(1) I built molecular surface and mapped potential to surface for each 
protein. I am plan to represent the surface of protein 1 in left, and 
surface of protein 2 in right. But I still don't try out to do so. Could 
Someone give me some hints to do so?
	(2) And I plan to label certain residues in the sueface, but I 
did not find way to do so. Is it possible in grasp?

	Thanks all for help!

ccchuang
    
  ============================================
    Chyh-Chong Chuang
    Institude of Biological Chemistry, 
    Academia Sinica,Taipei, Taiwan
  --------------------------------------------
    Phone: 886-2-7858981 ext 7091 
    Fax: 886-2-7883473
    E-Mail: ccchuang@gate.sinica.edu.tw
  ============================================


From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Mon Jan 19 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!ais.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!204.156.128.20!news1.best.com!noos.hooked.net!news.hooked.net!not-for-mail
From: "genomik" <vagabond@hooked.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: New Website for jobs in Molec-model, Genomics, BioInformatics
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 05:13:20 -0800
Organization: Hooked Online Services
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <6a2809$ind$1@its.hooked.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: italy-55.ppp.hooked.net
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3

Nice Links too
www.genomejobs.com
Check it out



From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Thu Jan 22 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!hecate.umd.edu!not-for-mail
From: Eugene Melamud <emelamud@carb.nist.gov>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: Re: grasp, how to? (1)
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 12:25:07 -0500
Organization: CARB
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <34C8D273.446B@carb.nist.gov>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.980120095412.4803A-100000@gate>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chipotle.carb.nist.gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01SGoldC-SGI (X11; I; IRIX64 6.4 IP30)
To: Chyh-chong Chuang <ccchuang@GATE.SINICA.EDU.TW>

Try :
http://tincan.bioc.columbia.edu/Lab/grasp/grasp_contents.html#7.1

Chyh-chong Chuang wrote:
> 
> Dear Grasp experts:
> 
>         I am a new grasp user. I hope to produce two kinds of
> representation of my molecules in grasp. I had tried, but I still don't
> get the way.
>         I have two different protein structures superimposed.
> 
>         (1) I built molecular surface and mapped potential to surface for each
> protein. I am plan to represent the surface of protein 1 in left, and
> surface of protein 2 in right. But I still don't try out to do so. Could
> Someone give me some hints to do so?
>         (2) And I plan to label certain residues in the sueface, but I
> did not find way to do so. Is it possible in grasp?
> 
>         Thanks all for help!
> 
> ccchuang
> 
>   ============================================
>     Chyh-Chong Chuang
>     Institude of Biological Chemistry,
>     Academia Sinica,Taipei, Taiwan
>   --------------------------------------------
>     Phone: 886-2-7858981 ext 7091
>     Fax: 886-2-7883473
>     E-Mail: ccchuang@gate.sinica.edu.tw
>   ============================================

-- 

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
	 
	 Eugene Melamud      
   
    Email: melamud@carb.nist.gov
    Tel  : 1-301-738-6240 

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Mon Jan 26 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!internet!biosci!not-for-mail
From: biohelp (BIOSCI Administrator)
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: BIOSCI/bionet miniFAQ & Fundraiser
Date: 27 Jan 1998 02:00:06 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 233
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199801271000.CAA14487@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

(LAST REVISION: 30-JUL-95)

This BIOSCI "miniFAQ" is designed to answer the questions that come up
the *most frequently*.  The main BIOSCI FAQ (Frequently Asked
Questions) is accessible on the World Wide Web at URL
http://www.bio.net/.

If you can not find an answer to your question in this or other
documentation, the BIOSCI technical support staff answers e-mail
queries sent to

		       biosci-help@net.bio.net

We can only answer questions about the use of the newsgroups and
mailing lists.  We unfortunately do not have the staff to do Internet
information searches or answer scientific questions.  Please post
those to the appropriate BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.


	Contents:
	--------
	0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!

	1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.

	2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.

	3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.

	4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.


0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!
------------------------------
BIOSCI's government funding has been expended, and we are now
operating solely from advertising revenue that we have raised from our
Web site at http://www.bio.net/.  We need just a few minutes of your
time to help us serve you.

You can do two important things which will take very little time for
you individually and will immensely help us continue to help you.

First, please use our WWW system at http://www.bio.net/ to access the
archives.  You can post or reply to messages via your Web browser as
described in item #1 below.  Your usage helps attract sponsors. If you
contact any of our sponsors, please be sure to thank them for
supporting BIOSCI. It is critical for them to get this feedback if
they are to continue their sponsorship for the long term.

Second, if you work for a company or organization that provides
products or services of interest to the biology community, please pass
this message on to your marketing or marketing communications
department or other appropriate group.  Please ask them to help
support BIOSCI by sponsoring our Web site and explain the uses and
benefits of the system to the biology community. If they are
interested, they can then contact us for further information at our
tech support address, biosci-help@net.bio.net.


1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.
--------------------------------------------------------
As of 10 December 1995, all BIOSCI/bionet full newsgroups are
accessible through the World Wide Web (WWW) at URL http://www.bio.net.
One can read and reply publicly or privately to both recent postings
and archived messages through one's Web browser if it is configured
properly to send e-mail.  Each newsgroup is equipped with its own WAIS
index.  The main BIOSCI home page also has access to the BIO-JOURNALS
Table of Contents database WAIS index and the BIOSCI user address
database described in another item further below.


2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.
-------------------------------------------------------
BIOSCI is a set of parallel USENET newsgroups (the "bionet" groups),
mailing lists, and a hypermail archive at URL http://www.bio.net/.
The same postings are distributed on all media (except for a small
number of mailing-list-only groups at net.bio.net).  Unfortunately it
is becoming a despicable practice on the Internet (by a few people out
to make a fast buck) to do automated mass postings to thousands of
newsgroups and mailing lists.  These attempts to grab free advertising
are refered to as "spams" in the usual, somewhat boneheaded, net
terminology.  USENET is more susceptible to this practice, and many
spams originate on the USENET groups and then are passed on to the
mailing lists.  However, spammers also get lists of mailing addresses
and hit these too, so neither medium is immune.

What should you do personally if you get junk mail?
---------------------------------------------------
Just delete it and move on without reading it further.  Filing a
protest is becoming increasingly useless because spammers are often
disguising the addresses where the messages are sent from.  Unless you
really understand Internet mail systems, your attempt at protest by
sending replies to the message will often end up being sent to the
address of an innocent person that the spammer is victimizing.

What can BIOSCI/bionet do to protect its newsgroups?
----------------------------------------------------
The only solution currently available is to moderate the newsgroup.
If this newsgroup is already moderated, then you are in good shape.
Moderation protects the USENET distribution from about 95% of the
spams that are being sent to date and protects the mailing lists
completely.  Moderation means, however, that someone has to take the
time to review each message before it goes out.  We have set up
software here that simply allows the moderator to forward to an
address at net.bio.net messages that (s)he wishes to have distributed.
This takes no more time than that needed to read the message and pass
it on, say about 1 min. per message.

Most newsgroups currently have a discussion leader who is responsible
for their newsgroup.  The discussions leaders and their e-mail
addresses are listed in the BIOSCI Information Sheet which is
available on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  If a newsgroup is being
hit with too many junk postings, please contact the discussion leader
for that group and see if there is interest in moderating the group.
Please do not assume that by simply posting a complaint to the
newsgroup itself, anyone on the BIOSCI staff will act on your
complaint.  With close to 100 newsgroups to run, the BIOSCI staff has
to rely on the discussion leaders of each newsgroup to report problems
directly to us at biosci-help@net.bio.net.

We will moderate any of our newsgroups if the discussion leader tells
us that the readership of the group wishes to do so and if a moderator
is willing to do the work.  For most BIOSCI/bionet groups, this
entails only a few minutes of work each day.

Moderating a newsgroup will resolve probably 95% of the junk postings
on the USENET distribution.  Unfortunately there are easy ways for
determined spammers to override the moderation mechanism on USENET,
but we can protect our e-mail subscribers from unwanted postings if
the newsgroup is moderated.  You can also access our newsgroups over
the WWW at URL http://www.bio.net.  While this Web interface will not
stop spammers from trying to post to the groups, this will give you
yet another way, besides using USENET news, to keep the junk out of
your personal mail files.  For those of you with local USENET news
systems, the Web interface will also give you faster access to new
newsgroups and recent postings.


3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.
------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE NOTE: The BIOSCI management does NOT act on
subscription/unsubscription requests that are posted improperly to the
newsgroups and mailing lists.  People who do this only bother everyone
on the lists to no avail.  Please be sure to follow the proper
procedures below.

Gory details are in the BIOSCI Information sheets on the Web at
http://www.bio.net.  Below we give an example utilizing the
METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list at both of our two BIOSCI sites:

Users in the Americas and Pacific Rim countries who use the BIOSCI
------------------------------------------------------------------
node at computer net.bio.net:
----------------------------

A) Determine the "listname" which is the <=8 character mail address
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   for the group.  These can be found in the BIOSCI Info. Sheet.  For
   the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS group the mailing address is
   methods@net.bio.net.  The listname is the portion of the address to
   the left of the @ sign, i.e., "methods".  The listname is used with
   the "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" commands illustrated below.

B) Mail all commands in the body of a mail message addressed to
   biosci-server@net.bio.net.  Do NOT send commands to the newsgroup
   posting addresses!  Leave the Subject: line blank, any text on it
   will be ignored.

C) In the body of your message put one or more of the following
   commands with an "end" command on the last line, e.g.,

   subscribe methods
   unsubscribe methods
   end

   Do NOT put your e-mail address or other text on these lines.  The
   server only allows you to cancel your subscription if the address
   on your mail header matches the address on our mailing list.
   Please ask for help at biosci-help@net.bio.net if your address has
   changed, e.g., if you know you are on the list but the server tells
   you that you are not a member.


Users in Europe, Africa, and Central Asia who use the BIOSCI node at
--------------------------------------------------------------------
computer daresbury.ac.uk (also known as dl.ac.uk):
-------------------------------------------------

To subscribe and unsubscribe to/from the BIOSCI lists, you need to
specify the full USENET newsgroup name with "bionet-news." prepended.
The USENET newsgroup names are listed in the BIOSCI Information sheet
on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  For the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list
the USENET newsgroup name is bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts, thus the
appropriate commands are

    sub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

    unsub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

These commands are included in a message addressed to mxt@dl.ac.uk,
NOT to the newsgroup mailing addresses.  As usual, include the text in
the body of the message as text on the Subject: line is ignored.

To unsubscribe from all the lists at the UK node, use

    unsub bionet-news

Please note that if the address in the list is different than the one
in your mail message header, you will not be able to unsubscribe by
this method. If you have problems, please mail biosci@daresbury.ac.uk.


4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Please take this opportunity to add your name, address, and research
interest information to the BIOSCI User Address Database if you have
not already done so.

You can fill out the address form directly through our Web page at URL
http://www.bio.net/adrform.html.

The address database is reindexed nightly for WWW access (the URL is
http://www.bio.net/).  If you are not directly on the Internet but can
reach it by e-mail, please use our waismail server to access the user
directory.  waismail use is described above.  You can also request a
user address form by e-mail from biosci-help@net.bio.net.

Please check your database entry from time-to-time to see if your
address information is still up-to-date.  Because of our limited
personnel resources, we ask that you resubmit a *complete* form to
revise your entry; we only replace complete entries and do not have
resources to edit old forms.


From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Tue Jan 27 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: <launch@LAUNCHMASTER.COM>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: Your Web Site Re-Launch
Date: 28 Jan 1998 17:04:32 -0000
Lines: 83
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <6anof0$5nn@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: launch@LAUNCHMASTER.COM
Original-To: molmodel@dl.ac.uk

To: molmodel@daresbury.ac.uk 

     Need a re-launch?  Launchmaster will re-launch 
     your web site to 50 search engines and indexes for $95. 
     Satisfaction guaranteed! 

Millions of people use search engines to find web sites every day.  But if
 your site isn't listed, no one will find it.

Launchmaster will re-launch your site by submitting it to the top 50 search 
engines for $95.

Here's how to do it:

1.  Complete the form below and return it to us.

2.  We'll post your site to 50 search engines within two business days, and 
we'll send you a complete report when we're finished.

3.  Pay nothing now.  We'll send you an invoice after we've completed the
posting. Your satisfaction is guaranteed!

These are permanent listings.  The $95 is a one-time fee.

WHICH SEARCH ENGINES?

Here's the list:

Excite, Alta Vista, Infoseek, Galaxy, HotBot, Lycos, Magellan, Open
Text Web Index, Web Crawler, BizWeb, New Riders WWW Yellow Pages, 
LinkMonster, True North, Northern Light, YelloWWWeb, The Weekly Bookmark,
Scrub The Web, Seven Wonders, Sserv, Starting Point, Web 100, Web Walker,
Net-Announce, New Page List, One World Plaza, PageHost A-Z, PeekABoo, Project
Cool, Where2Go, World Wide Business Yellow Pages, Wow! Web Wonders!, WWW 
Worm, JumpCity, The Galactic Galaxy, TurnPike, Unlock:The Information 
Exchange, Your WebScout, Manufacturers Information Network, Net Happenings,
Net Mall, Web World  Internet Directory, InfoSpace, Jayde Online Directory,
BC Internet, BizCardz Business Directory, WebVenture, Hotlist, What's New,
WhatUSeek, JumpLink, Linkcentre Directory.

ORDER FORM

Hit the REPLY button on your e-mail program and fill out the following information.
 (This information will be posted to the search engines/indexes):


Contact name: 
Company Name:
Address:
City:              State/Prov:     Zip/Postal Code: 
Telephone: 
Fax: 
Email address: 

Contact e-mail address (in case we have questions about this order): 

URL:  http://
Site Title: 
Description (250 characters): 

Key words (250 characters, in descending order of importance):

If  billing a different address, please complete the following:

Addressee: 
Company Name:
Address:
City:              State/Prov:     Zip/Postal Code: 
Telephone: 
Fax: 
Email address: 

TERMS

Terms are net 15 days from date of invoice.

______________________________________________________________________
Launchmaster, Inc.
12 Godfrey Place
Wilton CT 06897
Phone: (203) 834-5823 
Fax:   (203) 834-1897
E-mail: launch@launchmaster.com

From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Wed Jan 28 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!worldnet.att.net!newsadm
From: "Venkatesh Murthy" <venkmurthy@worldnet.att.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: Re: Protein Folding
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 19:23:42 -0500
Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <6aohtd$ov9@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>
References: <61238.robin073@tc.umn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.68.114.85
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4


Alan J. Robinson wrote in message <61238.robin073@tc.umn.edu>...
>Real proteins are obviously more complex than this in several
>different ways, so that the values of phi and psi observed in practice
>don't always fall within the regions shown on the plot, and certainly
>don't constrain the folding process itself in any direct way (though
>obviosuly constrained by steric considerations too.)


While Ramachandran outliers are observed in protein crystal structures,
typically their numbers are smaller in higher resolution structures
suggesting that, except in very rare cases, all amino acids must conform to
the Ramachandran plot.

This makes sense when you consider that the Ramachandran plot is primarily
dependent (including favorable terms has very little effect overall) on the
repulsive portion of the van der Waals potential.  Two atoms simply cannot
occupy the same space -- the electronic repulsions in dissallowed regions is
much stronger than favorable forces at work in proteins.  Simply put, except
in exceptionally rare cases, Ramachandran outliers are more indicative of
model errors than anything else.

Also, Ramachandran did not use a computer model to generate the plot.  The
plot was calculated (and intuited) by hand.  Finally, the plot is for a
dipeptide, not a polypeptide.


Venkatesh Murthy
-------
MD/PhD Candidate
Department of Biophysics & Biophysical Chemistry
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine



From owner-molec-model@net.bio.net Sat Jan 31 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov!cpk-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!209.150.160.22!newsfeed.wli.net!nntp.flash.net!news-feeder.onramp.net!news.onramp.net!not-for-mail
From: "Cynthia S. Smagula" <biota@onramp.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.molec-model
Subject: 1998 Source Book Available Free to Researchers
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 22:21:50 +0000
Organization: BIOTA Publications
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <34D3A3F7.1FC4@onramp.net>
Reply-To: biota@onramp.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: isdn14-48.dllstx.onramp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (Macintosh; I; PPC)

Obtain a free copy of the 1998 Source Book, a comprehensive guide to
bioresearch products, by filling in the request form at the BioSupplyNet
site: http://www.biosupplynet.com. The Source Book provides  up-to-date
information about molecular biology products, lab instrumentation, and
supplies. 70,000 copies of the Source Book will be given to scientists
this year.

Biomedical researchers will find that the unique organization of the
Source Book simplifies product searching and speeds the gathering of
comparative information. The Source Book indexes products in 2250
categories, and provides up-to-date contact information, including WWW
and e-mail addresses, for 3000 suppliers. Bench Basics comparative
tables allow apples-to-apples comparisons of products. A special Lab
Set-up Check List simplifies the process of putting together a new
laboratory.

The BioSupplyNet web site at http://www.biosupplynet.com ,the online
companion to the Source Book, provides interactive access to Source Book
information as well as several enhancements, including the BioToolKit, a
searchable directory of 500 free molecular biology databases, analytic
tools, and structural imaging software applications.

