From owner-repertoires@net.bio.net Sun Oct 06 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!news.ucdavis.edu!info.ucla.edu!unixg.ubc.ca!lpss
From: lpss@unixg.ubc.ca (Alex Chang)
Newsgroups: bionet.molecules.repertoires
Subject: What is the best immuno-panning method
Date: 7 Oct 1996 18:28:26 GMT
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <53bi4a$5gh@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: netinfo.ubc.ca
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

I recently have lots of trouble to do immuno-panning using MaxiSorb 
Immunotube (Nunce) for my phage (M13) display library. I'd like to know 
whether there is a better method to do this.



--
Alex Chang
Pathology
University of British Columbia
achang@hivnet.ubc.ca

From owner-repertoires@net.bio.net Tue Oct 08 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: "Janet Clench, Library, Tel:(39 6)91093220" <CLENCH@irbm.it>
Newsgroups: bionet.molecules.repertoires
Subject: the latest update on COmb. Libraries and similar repertoires
Date: 9 Oct 1996 08:36:49 +0100
Lines: 221
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <53fkmh$9la@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Original-To: molreps@dl.ac.uk

********************************************************
SUBJECT:	Combinatorial & Phage Libraries
DATE:		September 23, 30, October 7 1996
********************************************************

Biochemistry  35: 36 (SEP 10 1996)
MA Kelly, HB Liang, II Sytwu, I Vlattas, NL Lyons, BR Bowen, LP 
Wennogle
Characterization of SH2 - Ligand interactions via library affinity 
selection with mass spectrometric detection
11747-11755

Journal of Biological Chemistry  271: 37 (SEP 13 1996)
MJ Rosok, DE Yelton, LJ Harris, J Bajorath, KE Hellstrom, I 
Hellstrom, GA Cruz, K Kristensson, H Lin, WD Huse, SM Glaser
A combinatorial library strategy for the rapid humanization of 
anticarcinoma BR96 Fab
22611-22618

Protein Science  5: 9 (SEP 1996)
ZJ Ren, GK Lewis, PT Wingfield, EG Locke, AC Steven, LW Black
Phage display of intact domains at high copy number: A system based 
on SOC, the small outer capsid protein of bacteriophage T4
1833-1843

Chemistry & Biology  3: 8 (AUG 1996)
SB Feng, TM Kapoor, F Shirai, AP Combs, SL Schreiber
Molecular basis for the binding of SH3 ligands with non-peptide 
elements identified by combinatorial synthesis
661-670

Chemistry & Biology  3: 8 (AUG 1996)
HM Geysen, CD Wagner, WM Bodnar, CJ Markworth, GJ Parke, FJ 
Schoenen, DS Wagner, DS Kinder
Isotope or mass encoding of combinatorial libraries
679-688

Journal of Organic Chemistry  61: 18 (SEP 6 1996)
YF Shao, WC Still
Sequence-selective receptors of peptides. A simple molecular design for 
construction of large combinatorial libraries of receptors
6086-6087

Journal of Immunology  157: 3 (AUG 1 1996)
HI Yamanaka, T Inoue, O Ikedatanaka
Chicken monoclonal antibody isolated by a phage display system
1156-1162

Current Opinion in Structural Biology  6: 4 (AUG 1996)
ZX Shao, FH Arnold
Engineering new functions and altering existing functions
513-518

Nature Biotechnology  14: 9 (SEP 1996)
S Klussmann, A Nolte, R Bald, VA Erdmann, JP Furste
Mirror-image RNA that binds D-adenosine
1112-1115

Nature Biotechnology  14: 9 (SEP 1996)
BT Mcguinness, G Walter, K Fitzgerald, P Schuler, W Mahoney, AR 
Duncan, HR Hoogenboom
Phage diabody repertoires for selection of large numbers of bispecific 
antibody fragments
1149-1154

Journal of Molecular Biology  262: 1 (SEP 13 1996)
YG Mikawa, IN Maruyama, S Brenner
Surface display of proteins on bacteriophage lambda heads
21-30

Journal of Biomolecular NMR  8: 1 (JUL 1996)
G Barbato, DO Cicero, E Bianchi, A Pessi, R Bazzo
High-resolution solution structure of two members of a 
conformationally homogeneous combinatorial peptide library based on 
the classical zinc-finger motif
36-48

Nature Medicine  2: 9 (SEP 1996)
RHJ Begent, MJ Verhaar, KA Chester, JL Casey, AJ Green, MP 
Napier, LD Hopestone, N Cushen, PA Keep, CJ Johnson, RE 
Hawkins, AJW Hilson, L Robson
Clinical evidence of efficient tumor targeting based on single-chain Fv 
antibody selected from a combinatorial library
979-984

Tetrahedron  52: 37 (SEP 9 1996)
IE Pop, CF Dhalluin, BP Deprez, PC Melnyk, GM Lippens, AL Tartar
Monitoring of a three-step solid phase synthesis involving a Heck 
reaction using magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopy
12209-12222

Tetrahedron Letters  37: 36 (SEP 2 1996)
SR Gilbertson, XF Wang
The combinatorial synthesis of chiral phosphine ligands
6475-6478

Tetrahedron Letters  37: 36 (SEP 2 1996)
KW Jung, XY Zhao, KD Janda
A linker that allows efficient formation of aliphatic C-H bonds on 
polymeric supports
6491-6494

Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research  29: 9 (SEP 1996)
R Pasqualini, E Koivunen, E Ruoslahti
Peptides in cell adhesion: Powerful tools for the study of integrin-ligand 
interactions
1151-1158

Journal of Clinical Investigation  98: 4 (AUG 15 1996)
HK Jin, B Li, B Cunningham, J Tom, RH Yang, P Sehl, GR Thomas, 
A Ko, D Oare, DG Lowe
Novel analog of atrial natriuretic peptide selective for receptor-A 
produces increased diuresis and natriuresis in rats
969-976

Immunology  89: 1 (SEP 1996)
M Duenas, LT Chin, AC Malmborg, R Casalvilla, M Ohlin, CAK 
Borrebaeck
In vitro immunization of naive human B cells yields high affinity 
immunoglobulin G antibodies as illustrated by phage display
1-7

Trends in Biotechnology  14: 9 (SEP 1996)
MA Jongsma, WJ Stiekema, D Bosch
Combatting inhibitor-insensitive proteases of insect pests
331-333

Trends in Biotechnology  14: 9 (SEP 1996)
C Khosla, RJX Zawada
Generation of polyketide libraries via combinatorial biosynthesis
335-341

Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics  333: 1 (SEP 1 1996)
SL Deutscher, ME Crider, JA Ringbauer, AA Komissarov, TP Quinn
Stability studies of nucleic acid-binding Fab isolated from combinatorial 
bacteriophage display libraries
207-213

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease  1316: 3 
(AUG 23 1996)
S Tyutyulkova, QS Gao, A Thompson, S Rennard, S Paul
Efficient vasoactive intestinal polypeptide hydrolyzing autoantibody 
light chains selected by phage display
217-223

European Journal of Biochemistry  240: 1 (AUG 15 1996)
B Fleckenstein, H Kalbacher, CP Muller, D Stoll, T Halder, G Jung, 
KH Wiesmuller
New ligands binding to the human leukocyte antigen class II molecule 
DRB1(*)0101 based on the activity pattern of an undecapeptide library
71-77

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition in English  35: 15 (AUG 19 
1996)
BM Cole, KD Shimizu, CA Krueger, JPA Harrity, ML Snapper, AH 
Hoveyda
Discovery of chiral catalysts through ligand diversity: Ti-catalyzed 
enantioselective addition of TMSCN to meso epoxides
1668-1671

International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research  48: 2 (AUG 
1996)
AM Sefler, G Lauri, PA Barlett
A convenient method for determining cyclic peptide conformation from 
1D H-1-NMR information
129-138

Journal of the American Chemical Society  118: 33 (AUG 21 1996)
YH Chu, YM Dunayevskiy, DP Kirby, P Vouros, BL Karger
Affinity capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry for screening 
combinatorial libraries
7827-7835

Journal of the American Chemical Society  118: 34 (AUG 28 1996)
BA Katz, BS Liu, R Cass
Structure-based design tools: Structural and thermodynamic comparison 
with biotin of a small molecule that binds to streptavidin with 
micromolar affinity
7914-7920

Journal of the American Chemical Society  118: 34 (AUG 28 1996)
K Russell, DC Cole, FM Mclaren, DE Pivonka
Analytical techniques for combinatorial chemistry: Quantitative infrared 
spectroscopic measurements of deuterium-labeled protecting groups
7941-7945

Journal of Organic Chemistry  61: 16 (AUG 9 1996)
R Fathi, MJ Rudolph, RG Gentles, R Patel, EW Macmillan, MS 
Reitman, D Pelham, AF Cook
Synthesis and properties of combinatorial libraries of phosphoramidates
5600-5609

Tetrahedron Letters  37: 35 (AUG 26 1996)
P Seneci, C Sizemore, K Islam, P Kocis
Combinatorial chemistry and natural products. Teicoplanin aglycone as 
a molecular scaffold for solid phase synthesis of combinatorial libraries
6319-6322

Drug Discovery Today  1: 9 (SEP 1996)
N Terrett
Combinatorial chemistry
402

Research on Chemical Intermediates  22: 7 (1996)
I Ugi, M Goebel, B Gruber, M Heilingbrunner, C Heiss, W Horl, O 
Kern, M Starnecker, A Domling
Molecular libraries in liquid phase via UGI-MCR
625-644

Theoretica Chimica Acta  94: 2 (AUG 1996)
S Fujita
Pseudo-point groups and chronality in enumeration of reaction pairs
105-124

Chemicke Listy  90: 8 (AUG 1996)
F Svec
Combinatorial syntheses or ''mathematics'' and ''libraries'' in 
chemistry
477-485



From owner-repertoires@net.bio.net Wed Oct 16 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov!not-for-mail
From: toms@ncifcrf.gov (Tom Schneider)
Newsgroups: bionet.info-theory,bionet.molecules.repertoires
Subject: Re: General Questions (Observations to follow)
Date: 17 Oct 1996 17:12:04 GMT
Organization: NCI-FCRDC Frederick Biomedical Supercomputing Center
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <545pd4$9a24@ncisun1-nf0.ncifcrf.gov>
References: <ben.lieberman-ya023180001510960941090001@tali.uchsc.edu> <5413ai$9a23@ncisun1-nf0.ncifcrf.gov> <ben.lieberman-ya023180001710960905280001@tali.uchsc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kaylor.ncifcrf.gov
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
Xref: biosci bionet.info-theory:4333 bionet.molecules.repertoires:257

Ben Lieberman (ben.lieberman@uchsc.edu) wrote:
 
: Already figured out a way to do it in-vivo.  It would require modifying the
: host strain to protect internal sequences against digestion.  This may be
: possible by "evolving" a methylase first, then going after the restriction
: enzyme, or by "co-evolving" the host and the enzyme (just like nature only
: faster).  The methylase method would reduce the number of possible
: sequences to be selected to those containing methylation (A or C) residues.

It's not clear to me how this selection would work.  (You might not want to
post your idea; it may be patentable.)

Your discussion above suggests a scheme.  Possibly one could put the initial
methylase/restriction enzyme on a plasmid to allow rounds of dirty PCR
amplification to make mutations.  (The plasmid replication and drug
resistance would be easily selected for, bad ones would not replicate.)  Then
select bacteria that are resistant to a lambda vir (ie cI- operator-) that
has many copies of the sequence you want to attack.  One might think that the
main problem would be detecting bacteria that become resistant to lambda
infection, but if you did rounds of extraction of the plasmid, PCR mutation
and re-transformation, this would be avoided!  The sequence you have in the
lambda should initially be similar to the methylase/restriction system.

: Alternatively there may be a possible way of combinatorial combinations of
: point directed mutagensis to do the same in vitro - but I have to think :
more about it.

The possibility exists to express a restriction enzyme on the surface of a
bacteriophage, along with a streptavidin to bind the phage to the end of a
repeat-sequence DNA attached to a magnetic bead.  Phage that consistently cut
themselves away from the bead would be the ones you want.

I'm cross posting to bionet.molecules.repertoires.

Lest folks think that this is not relevant to the bionet.info-theory group,
consider that the evolution of restriction enzyme binding sites is MORE
mysterious than that of "fuzzy" sites like ribosome or spliceosome sites
because of Shannon's channel capacity precision theorem.  How can they be so
precise without having many "pins"?  How can they evolve across the big gaps
in sequence patterns?

: Thanks for the reply.

You're welcome!

  Tom Schneider
  National Cancer Institute
  Laboratory of Mathematical Biology
  Frederick, Maryland  21702-1201
  toms@ncifcrf.gov
  http://www-lmmb.ncifcrf.gov/~toms/

From owner-repertoires@net.bio.net Mon Oct 21 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: Andrew Wallace <a.wallace@qub.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molecules.repertoires
Subject: Re: General Questions (Observations to follow)  <fwd>
Date: 22 Oct 1996 18:57:24 +0100
Lines: 57
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <54j1u4$jom@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Original-Sender: awallace@uk.ac.qub
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Authentication: none
Read-Receipt-To: Andrew Wallace <a.wallace@qub.ac.uk>
Original-To: molreps@dl.ac.uk

Reposting this as it was sent to the wrong address the first time...

On Fri, 18 Oct 1996 12:55:04 +0100  Andrew Wallace 
<a.wallace@qub.ac.uk> wrote:


> 
> Dear Tom et al.,
> 
> Would it be possible for one of you to cross-post the start of this 
> discussion to bionet.molecules.repertoires so that everyone can follow 
> it from the beginning?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew
> 
> P.S. Note new web page location (see sig) and new direct phone number
> Tel. +44-1232-272089/2196 (office/lab)
> 
> On 17 Oct 1996 17:12:04 GMT Tom Schneider <toms@ncifcrf.gov> wrote:
> 
> 
> > Ben Lieberman (ben.lieberman@uchsc.edu) wrote:
> >  
> > : Already figured out a way to do it in-vivo.  It would require modifying the
> > : host strain to protect internal sequences against digestion.  This may be
> > : possible by "evolving" a methylase first, then going after the restriction
> > : enzyme, or by "co-evolving" the host and the enzyme (just like nature only
> > : faster).  The methylase method would reduce the number of possible
> > : sequences to be selected to those containing methylation (A or C) residues.
> > 
> > It's not clear to me how this selection would work.  (You might not want to
> > post your idea; it may be patentable.)
> >
> 
> [I deleted the rest to save bandwidth...]
>  
> >   Tom Schneider
> >   National Cancer Institute
> >   Laboratory of Mathematical Biology
> >   Frederick, Maryland  21702-1201
> >   toms@ncifcrf.gov
> >   http://www-lmmb.ncifcrf.gov/~toms/
> > 
> > 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Andrew Wallace, Ph.D,  Queen's University Belfast, N. Ireland (UK)
> a.wallace@qub.ac.uk    http://web.qub.ac.uk/bb/awpage/wallace.html
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Wallace, Ph.D,  Queen's University Belfast, N. Ireland (UK)
a.wallace@qub.ac.uk    http://web.qub.ac.uk/bb/awpage/wallace.html



From owner-repertoires@net.bio.net Tue Oct 22 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!EMAIL.UNC.EDU!briankay
From: briankay@EMAIL.UNC.EDU (Brian Kay)
Newsgroups: bionet.molecules.repertoires
Subject: Phage Display Book out
Date: 23 Oct 1996 11:45:47 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 24
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <v0301050bae93dfe1e8dc@[152.2.66.22]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hi All,

The "Phage Display of Peptides and Proteins: A Laboratory Manual" has
finally been published. You can find the table of contents at URL:
http://www.unc.edu/depts/biology/bkay/phagedisplay.html


Brian

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Brian Kay
Associate Professor of Biology
321 Fordham Hall
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280

Office: 919-962-2144
Fax: 919-962-1625
Email: briankay@email.unc.edu
Webpages: http://kay02.bio.unc.edu/
Phage Display Book: http://www.unc.edu/depts/biology/bkay/phagedisplay.html
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=



From owner-repertoires@net.bio.net Tue Oct 22 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!bioftp.unibas.ch!infobiogen.fr!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!howland.erols.net!EU.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!csn!nntp-xfer-1.csn.net!news-2.csn.net!csn!nntp-xfer-2.csn.net!tali.UCHSC.edu!ben.lieberman
From: ben.lieberman@uchsc.edu (Ben Lieberman)
Newsgroups: bionet.molecules.repertoires
Subject: Re: General Questions (Observations to follow)  <fwd>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 08:49:04 -0600
Organization: UCHSC
Lines: 39
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <ben.lieberman-ya023180002310960849040001@tali.uchsc.edu>
References: <54j1u4$jom@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: brbmxt204.uchsc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.3.1

In article <54j1u4$jom@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>, Andrew Wallace
<a.wallace@qub.ac.uk> wrote:


> > Would it be possible for one of you to cross-post the start of this 
> > discussion to bionet.molecules.repertoires so that everyone can follow 
> > it from the beginning?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Andrew

Sure thing Andrew,
  This disscussion started with a list of questions I had about information
theory and biology.  You can probably still find the beginning of the
thread in the bionet.info-theory group.  The general gist of this part of
the thread was about how to "co-evolve" bactera (e.g. E. coli) to produce a
restriction enzyme that would specifically recognize any sequence you were
interested in cutting.  My rough idea was to start with a mutator strain of
E.coli (one in which the DNA polymerase error correction activity is
comprimised) and a plasmid encoding a "randomized" version of a well known
restriction enzyme (e.g. EcoRI) were the DNA contacts are well established. 
By allowing the amino acids comprising the recognition site in the protein
to be altered (yes the mutator strain will also make hash of the coding
sequence, but this is going to be a selection screen so it won't matter),
and providing a the sequence of interest in a selectable way (Tom suggested
using lambda phage), you can allow a natural selection to take place.  The
details of this are very shaky, and I am not sure yet how to pull it off,
but the value (commercial and scientific) are obvious.  Think about how
much restriction enzyme is produced by companies on a yearly basis and you
get the idea.  Also, the idea of engineering DNA binding proteins to suit
is very attractive.

Ben Lieberman
ben.lieberman@uchsc.edu

-- 
I sometimes wish that things could be more like they are.
                                    - J. Jensen -

From owner-repertoires@net.bio.net Sun Oct 27 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!internet!biosci!not-for-mail
From: biohelp (BIOSCI Administrator)
Newsgroups: bionet.molecules.repertoires
Subject: BIOSCI/bionet miniFAQ & Fundraiser
Date: 28 Oct 1996 02:00:36 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 239
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199610281000.CAA10608@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

(LAST REVISION: 30-JUL-95)

This BIOSCI "miniFAQ" is designed to answer the questions that come up
the *most frequently*.  The main BIOSCI FAQ (Frequently Asked
Questions) is accessible on the World Wide Web at URL
http://www.bio.net/.

If you can not find an answer to your question in this or other
documentation, the BIOSCI technical support staff answers e-mail
queries sent to

		       biosci-help@net.bio.net

We can only answer questions about the use of the newsgroups and
mailing lists.  We unfortunately do not have the staff to do Internet
information searches or answer scientific questions.  Please post
those to the appropriate BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.


	Contents:
	--------
	0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!

	1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.

	2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.

	3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.

	4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.


0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!
------------------------------
BIOSCI's government funding has been expended, and we are now
operating solely from advertising revenue that we have raised from our
Web site at http://www.bio.net/.  We need just a few minutes of your
time to help us serve you.

You can do two important things which will take very little time for
you individually and will immensely help us continue to help you.

First, please use our WWW system at http://www.bio.net/ to access the
archives.  You can post or reply to messages via your Web browser as
described in item #1 below.  Your usage helps attract sponsors. If you
contact any of our sponsors, please be sure to thank them for
supporting BIOSCI. It is critical for them to get this feedback if
they are to continue their sponsorship for the long term.

Second, if you work for a company or organization that provides
products or services of interest to the biology community, please pass
this message on to your marketing or marketing communications
department or other appropriate group.  Please ask them to help
support BIOSCI by sponsoring our Web site and explain the uses and
benefits of the system to the biology community. If they are
interested, they can then contact us for further information at our
tech support address, biosci-help@net.bio.net.


1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.
--------------------------------------------------------
As of 10 December 1995, all BIOSCI/bionet full newsgroups are
accessible through the World Wide Web (WWW) at URL http://www.bio.net.
One can read and reply publicly or privately to both recent postings
and archived messages through one's Web browser if it is configured
properly to send e-mail.  Each newsgroup is equipped with its own WAIS
index.  The main BIOSCI home page also has access to the BIO-JOURNALS
Table of Contents database WAIS index and the BIOSCI user address
database described in another item further below.


2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.
-------------------------------------------------------
BIOSCI is a set of parallel USENET newsgroups (the "bionet" groups),
mailing lists, and a hypermail archive at URL http://www.bio.net/.
The same postings are distributed on all media (except for a small
number of mailing-list-only groups at net.bio.net).  Unfortunately it
is becoming a despicable practice on the Internet (by a few people out
to make a fast buck) to do automated mass postings to thousands of
newsgroups and mailing lists.  These attempts to grab free advertising
are refered to as "spams" in the usual, somewhat boneheaded, net
terminology.  USENET is more susceptible to this practice, and many
spams originate on the USENET groups and then are passed on to the
mailing lists.  However, spammers also get lists of mailing addresses
and hit these too, so neither medium is immune.

What should you do personally if you get junk mail?
---------------------------------------------------
Just delete it and move on without reading it further.  Filing a
protest is becoming increasingly useless because spammers are often
disguising the addresses where the messages are sent from.  Unless you
really understand Internet mail systems, your attempt at protest by
sending replies to the message will often end up being sent to the
address of an innocent person that the spammer is victimizing.

What can BIOSCI/bionet do to protect its newsgroups?
----------------------------------------------------
The only solution currently available is to moderate the newsgroup.
If this newsgroup is already moderated, then you are in good shape.
Moderation protects the USENET distribution from about 95% of the
spams that are being sent to date and protects the mailing lists
completely.  Moderation means, however, that someone has to take the
time to review each message before it goes out.  We have set up
software here that simply allows the moderator to forward to an
address at net.bio.net messages that (s)he wishes to have distributed.
This takes no more time than that needed to read the message and pass
it on, say about 1 min. per message.

Most newsgroups currently have a discussion leader who is responsible
for their newsgroup.  The discussions leaders and their e-mail
addresses are listed in the BIOSCI Information Sheet which is
available on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  If a newsgroup is being
hit with too many junk postings, please contact the discussion leader
for that group and see if there is interest in moderating the group.
Please do not assume that by simply posting a complaint to the
newsgroup itself, anyone on the BIOSCI staff will act on your
complaint.  With close to 100 newsgroups to run, the BIOSCI staff has
to rely on the discussion leaders of each newsgroup to report problems
directly to us at biosci-help@net.bio.net.

We will moderate any of our newsgroups if the discussion leader tells
us that the readership of the group wishes to do so and if a moderator
is willing to do the work.  For most BIOSCI/bionet groups, this
entails only a few minutes of work each day.

Moderating a newsgroup will resolve probably 95% of the junk postings
on the USENET distribution.  Unfortunately there are easy ways for
determined spammers to override the moderation mechanism on USENET,
but we can protect our e-mail subscribers from unwanted postings if
the newsgroup is moderated.  You can also access our newsgroups over
the WWW at URL http://www.bio.net.  While this Web interface will not
stop spammers from trying to post to the groups, this will give you
yet another way, besides using USENET news, to keep the junk out of
your personal mail files.  For those of you with local USENET news
systems, the Web interface will also give you faster access to new
newsgroups and recent postings.


3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.
------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE NOTE: The BIOSCI management does NOT act on
subscription/unsubscription requests that are posted improperly to the
newsgroups and mailing lists.  People who do this only bother everyone
on the lists to no avail.  Please be sure to follow the proper
procedures below.

Gory details are in the BIOSCI Information sheets on the Web at
http://www.bio.net.  Below we give an example utilizing the
METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list at both of our two BIOSCI sites:

Users in the Americas and Pacific Rim countries who use the BIOSCI
------------------------------------------------------------------
node at computer net.bio.net:
----------------------------

A) Determine the "listname" which is the <=8 character mail address
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   for the group.  These can be found in the BIOSCI Info. Sheet.  For
   the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS group the mailing address is
   methods@net.bio.net.  The listname is the portion of the address to
   the left of the @ sign, i.e., "methods".  The listname is used with
   the "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" commands illustrated below.

B) Mail all commands in the body of a mail message addressed to
   biosci-server@net.bio.net.  Do NOT send commands to the newsgroup
   posting addresses!  Leave the Subject: line blank, any text on it
   will be ignored.

C) In the body of your message put one or more of the following
   commands with an "end" command on the last line, e.g.,

   subscribe methods
   unsubscribe methods
   end

   Do NOT put your e-mail address or other text on these lines.  The
   server only allows you to cancel your subscription if the address
   on your mail header matches the address on our mailing list.
   Please ask for help at biosci-help@net.bio.net if your address has
   changed, e.g., if you know you are on the list but the server tells
   you that you are not a member.


Users in Europe, Africa, and Central Asia who use the BIOSCI node at
--------------------------------------------------------------------
computer daresbury.ac.uk (also known as dl.ac.uk):
-------------------------------------------------

To subscribe and unsubscribe to/from the BIOSCI lists, you need to
specify the full USENET newsgroup name with "bionet-news." prepended.
The USENET newsgroup names are listed in the BIOSCI Information sheet
on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  For the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list
the USENET newsgroup name is bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts, thus the
appropriate commands are

    sub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

    unsub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

These commands are included in a message addressed to mxt@dl.ac.uk,
NOT to the newsgroup mailing addresses.  As usual, include the text in
the body of the message as text on the Subject: line is ignored.

To unsubscribe from all the lists at the UK node, use

    unsub bionet-news

Please note that if the address in the list is different than the one
in your mail message header, you will not be able to unsubscribe by
this method. If you have problems, please mail biosci@daresbury.ac.uk.


4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Please take this opportunity to add your name, address, and research
interest information to the BIOSCI User Address Database if you have
not already done so.

You can fill out the address form directly through our Web page at URL
http://www.bio.net/adrform.html.

The address database is reindexed nightly for WWW access (the URL is
http://www.bio.net/).  If you are not directly on the Internet but can
reach it by e-mail, please use our waismail server to access the user
directory.  waismail use is described above.  You can also request a
user address form by e-mail from biosci-help@net.bio.net.

Please check your database entry from time-to-time to see if your
address information is still up-to-date.  Because of our limited
personnel resources, we ask that you resubmit a *complete* form to
revise your entry; we only replace complete entries and do not have
resources to edit old forms.

				Sincerely,

				Dave Kristofferson
				BIOSCI/bionet Manager

				biosci-help@net.bio.net

From owner-repertoires@net.bio.net Sun Oct 27 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!news.sgi.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.uoregon.edu!news.rediris.es!news.csic.es!news
From: cibsm1s@fresno.csic.es (Jesus Sanz)
Newsgroups: bionet.molecules.repertoires
Subject: Peptide display
Date: 28 Oct 1996 17:34:35 GMT
Organization: CIB/CSIC
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <552qrb$q3p@granado>
NNTP-Posting-Host: jesus.cib.csic.es
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+


Hi, netters,

I've recently used the phage display system and was able to
identify a family of sequence-related peptides that bind to
my protein. I syntethized the peptides but they did not have
any effect on the activity of the enzyme. However, I constructed
a fusion with a choline-binding protein that can be purified
in a single step in DEAE-cellulose. The reason for doing this
was that maybe the peptide needed to be conformationally constrained
in order to interact with the enzyme (in the phage-display system
the peptide is actually fused to gene III protein). Such fusion
works, i.e., modulates the activity of the enzyme, although
the activation is not what I call "impressing".

I am sure that, if I can find the suitable "scaffold", the peptide
fused to it can be extremely effective. I would appreciate any information 
from you about polypeptides with some of all of the following properties:

1) Allow fusions
2) Overproduced and easy to purify
3) Small size (<12 kDa, so that I can monitor the binding by NMR techniques,
for example)
4) Non toxic for humans (so that I can use them "in vivo")

Am I asking for too much? (Don't answer me).

Thank you very much for any response.

Jesus

---------
Dr. Jesus M. Sanz                         E-mail:cibsm1s@fresno.csic.es
Centro de Investigaciones                 Talk: jesuso@jesus.cib.csic.es
   Biologicas                             Phone:(34)(1)5611800 Ext 4368
Velazquez, 144;  28006-Madrid, Spain      Fax:(34)(1)5627518
---------

From owner-repertoires@net.bio.net Tue Oct 29 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!NMSU.EDU!dkim
From: dkim@NMSU.EDU ("D. KIM")
Newsgroups: bionet.molecules.repertoires
Subject: ultra pellet of M13
Date: 30 Oct 1996 06:27:01 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 5
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961030072550.11871A-100000@verdi>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Can anyone tell me what are good conditions for doing an ultracentrifuge 
pellet of M13 phage?  I'd guess this is a CsCl cushion method . . .
Thanks
Daniel Kim
dkim@nmsu.edu

From owner-repertoires@net.bio.net Tue Oct 29 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!novell.pg.tno.nl!R.HANEMAAIJER
From: R.HANEMAAIJER@novell.pg.tno.nl ("R Hanemaaijer")
Newsgroups: bionet.molecules.repertoires
Subject: FAb-isolation\purification
Date: 30 Oct 1996 02:57:42 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 17
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <MAILQUEUE-101.961030103143.416@novell.pg.tno.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net


I've a question about the isolation\purification of Fab's. We have 
selected specific Fab's from a human library and isolated them from 
the E. Coli's by the freeze-dry method. We would like to use them as 
catching antibodies coated on 96-well plates and therefore need to 
purify them.
Has anyone of you good experiences with the purification of Fab's ? 
We tried protein G (Pharmacia claimed that protein G binds both 
intact antibodies and Fabs), but the few Fab's we tried with protein G 
did not bind. We cannot use a ligand-coated column, because the 
amount of protein is limited.

Hope someone can help me,

Thanks,

Roeland Hanemaaijer

From owner-repertoires@net.bio.net Tue Oct 29 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: Franco Felici <FELICI@irbm.it>
Newsgroups: bionet.molecules.repertoires
Subject: Re: ultra pellet of M13
Date: 30 Oct 1996 15:50:35 -0000
Lines: 12
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <557tgb$ec6@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Original-To: molreps@dl.ac.uk

Daniel Kim asks:

>Can anyone tell me what are good conditions for doing an ultracentrifuge
>pellet of M13 phage? 

Phage can be pelleted from aqueous suspensions through ultracentrifugation 
at 50,000 rpm for 4 hours at 4 C in a Beckman 70Ti rotor (or equivalent).

Best wishes,

Franco Felici
felici@irbm.it

