From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 01 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!herts.ac.uk!P.Ofarrell
From: P.Ofarrell@herts.ac.uk (Paul O'Farrell)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Finding open reading frames
Date: 2 Aug 1996 04:20:46 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 16
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <7290.9608021123@altair.herts.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

"Does anyone know any site which analyses nucleotide sequences in all
six reading frames, and identifies all ORF's ?"


I dont know if this is exactly what your looking for, but the BLASTX
programme Will compare all 6 reading frames of your sequence to the protein
data bases for homology. It won't find orf's for you, but if you find good
homology you'll know what reading frame to use.

If you send a message to blast@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov with help as the body of
the message they'll email you the full instructions.
Paul





From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 01 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!hunter.premier.net!news.cais.net!nntp04.primenet.com!news.shkoo.com!nntp.primenet.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!in2p3.fr!swidir.switch.ch!01-newsfeed.univie.ac.at!Austria.EU.net!EU.net!Portugal.EU.net!news.rccn.net!scsing.switch.ch!swsbe6.switch.ch!surfnet.nl!news.wau.nl!usenet
From: Pedro Silva <Pedro.Silva@epr.bc.wau.nl>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Finding open reading frames
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 1996 09:47:43 -0700
Organization: wau.nl
Lines: 2
Message-ID: <3202312F.1A73@epr.bc.wau.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: flex076.tran.wau.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I)

Does anyone know any site which analyses nucleotide sequences in all
six reading frames, and identifies all ORF's ?

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 01 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!news.ucdavis.edu!dcn67.dcn.davis.ca.us!user
From: ijiwaru@wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: ScFv-expression in pVIII???
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 1996 00:21:20 +0500
Organization: University of California, Davis
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <ijiwaru-0208960021200001@dcn67.dcn.davis.ca.us>
References: <31FF67DA.D63@mailserv.cuhk.hk> <ijiwaru-3107961021000001@dcn71.dcn.davis.ca.us>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dcn67.dcn.davis.ca.us
X-Newsreader: Value-Added NewsWatcher 2.0b27.1+

In article <ijiwaru-3107961021000001@dcn71.dcn.davis.ca.us>,
ijiwaru@wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us wrote:

> In article <31FF67DA.D63@mailserv.cuhk.hk>, b574713@mailserv.cuhk.hk wrote:
> 
> > Dear phage-library workers'
> >         I would like to know whether ScFv-antibody normally expressed in
> pIII protein can 
> > be expressed in pVIII protein. If not, are there any ways to increase
> ScFv-antibody copy
> > number per phage which is about 1-5 copies per phage in the case of pIII
> protein? The
> > problem I found is the ScFv-Ab phage derived from my hybridoma  binds
> only weakly to
> > the antigen.
> 
> You probably wouldn't have much success with displaying ScFvs on pVIII as
[stuff deleted}
I do have to correct myself, I do know of one successful display of
something rather large in pVIII.  Charles Craik has built phage with
trypsin:pVIII incorporated into it and the trypsin is active.  However,
this is the only case I know of with something that large (~24kD).

Good luck.

> 
> Lyle Najita
> Plant Pathology
> University of California - Davis

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 01 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!in2p3.fr!swidir.switch.ch!01-newsfeed.univie.ac.at!Austria.EU.net!EU.net!main.Germany.EU.net!fu-berlin.de!informatik.tu-muenchen.de!lrz-muenchen.de!uni-erlangen.de!winx03!wpxx02!not-for-mail
From: krasel@wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de (Cornelius Krasel)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Qiagen DNA purification resin - what is it?
Followup-To: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts
Date: 2 Aug 1996 08:24:17 GMT
Organization: University of Wuerzburg, Germany
Lines: 80
Message-ID: <4tsdvh$k7e@winx03.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
References: <4tlpbs$2hc4@news.doit.wisc.edu> <gjenkins-0108960831430001@144.92.218.197> <4tr6io$2l76@news.doit.wisc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:47539 bionet.molbio.proteins:8431

[fixed some attribution; followups to the cloners' group only]

I wrote some BS in my last posting (seems my brain was on vacation while
writing :-) I cancelled it. You will still find it in the archives :-(

Dima Klenchin (klenchin@macc.wisc.edu) wrote:
> In article <gjenkins-0108960831430001@144.92.218.197>,
>    gjenkins@facstaff.wisc.edu (Glenn Jenkins) wrote:
> ->In article <4tlpbs$2hc4@news.doit.wisc.edu>, klenchin@macc.wisc.edu 
> ->(Dima Klenchin) wrote:
> ->
> ->> Just curious - what type of anion exchanger is it? 
> ->> QAE? And what is the support made of? Simply can't believe
> ->> this is smth magic that qiagen developed. Must be some oldie
> ->> for which a new application was found. 
> ->
> ->My understanding is that it is has charged groups (ie. DEAE?) attached 
> ->to a silica matrix. These groups are attached in high density which allows 
> ->a greater salt gradient to be used to elute the DNA. Thus you will have 
> ->less overlap with proteins and RNA. 
> ->
> ->I do not find a great advantage of their preps($$) except if I want 
> highly
> ->pure DNA. Time wise is it not much of a savings either. One day when I
> ->have time I want to do the basic miniprep and apply the Na Acetate/DNA
> ->solution to a DEAE sepharose column to see what sticks. I suspect there
> ->will not be much of a difference.
> ->
> ->Does anyone else have any ideas?
> 
> Well, DEAE for *NA purification has been used *widely* in "dark ages" 
> (before all these fancy kit$). I'm still wondering what's that special 
> about Qiagen's stuff. And, alas, there is no information on _type_ of 
> exchanger in archives. Silica is the support? Great. That would mean that 
> the resin should not been used below pH ~ 6.0 Is this true? 

Some of the Quiagen blurb:

---start---

QIAGEN resin is a unique anion-exchanger with a hydrophilic surface
modification that selectively separates nucleic acids from other
substances, such as proteins, carbohydrates, metabolites, or dyes.
The macroporous anion-exchanger, with a particle size of approx.
100 um, has a hydrophilic surface coating containing DEAE groups,
creating an extremely high surface charge density. The large pore
size, together with the high density of anion-exchange groups,
provide the extraordinarily broad separation range that makes
QIAGEN resin unique.

The separation range of QIAGEN resin extends from 0.1 M to 1.6 M salt.
Conventional anion-exchangers, based on cellulose, dextran or agarose,
have separation ranges only up to 0.4 M salt. Binding and elution of
all substances is thus limited to a narrow range of salt concentrations.
As the elution peaks of proteins, RNA, and DNA overlap extensively
with one another, a satisfactory separation cannot be achieved.

QIAGEN resin will not function in the presence of anionic detergents
such as SDS, or at a pH less than 4.0.

---end---

I don't think their support is silica: Qiagen has been fairly quick
to sue competitors who use similar resins; however, they have apparently
not been able to sue Macherey & Nagel, who sell a similar kit (called
"Nucleobond") where the resin is derivatized silica. Also, the description
of the resin (the "hydrophilic coating") does not speak for silica.

The DNA from Qiagen columns in my experience is about as clean as DNA
from CsCl preps (but contains less salt). It's much less hassle, however.

Usual disclaimers apply. (I don't work for Qiagen. I don't get any
profit from this posting. I don't ... :-)

--Cornelius.

-- 
/* Cornelius Krasel, U Wuerzburg, Dept. of Pharmacology, Versbacher Str. 9 */
/* D-97078 Wuerzburg, Germany   email: phak004@rzbox.uni-wuerzburg.de  SP3 */
/* "Science is the game we play with God to find out what His rules are."  */

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 01 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!fu-berlin.de!informatik.tu-muenchen.de!lrz-muenchen.de!news
From: diabetes@lrz.uni-muenchen.de (Wolfgang Schechinger)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Q: Looking for GFP-cDNA
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 1996 21:48:34 GMT
Organization: Institute for Diabetes Research
Lines: 17
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4ttt3g$7g@sparcserver.lrz-muenchen.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dial146.ppp.lrz-muenchen.de
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:47582 bionet.molbio.proteins:8434

Hi everyone out there. 

Actually, everything is in the subject line. I want to link GFP to a
protein I plan to express in E. coli and in eucaryotic cells. If you
could share afew nanograms of GFP-cDNA and some microliters of
PCR-primers, please let me know. I would be very happy.

Greetings from Munich!
Wolfgang Schechinger
Institute for Diabetes Research
Kölner Platz 1
80804 Muenchen
Germany
Phone +49 (89) 30 79 31 24
Fax            30 81 73 3
E-mail: DIABETES@LRZ.UNI-MUENCHEN.DE


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 01 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!iata.csic.es!poseva
From: poseva@iata.csic.es (Eva Dupille)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: (none)
Date: 2 Aug 1996 06:42:36 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 2
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <01BB8088.62C4E8C0@alzacarias.iata.csic.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

unsubscribe


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Aug 02 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!maze.dpo.uab.edu!topaz.microbio.uab.edu!sai
From: Arioch <sai@topaz.microbio.uab.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Discussion:questions about gel filtration...
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 1996 21:03:51 -0500
Organization: University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.93.960803204858.7856A-100000@topaz.microbio.uab.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: topaz.microbio.uab.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

hey all,
	...cant seem to get a straight answer out of the other people in
my lab, so i'll try here...ok..after having tried dialysis  and the
ultrafree concentration device and not having too much success with them,
i've turned to gel filtration to (a).desalt my protein sample/buffer
exchange into buffer of choice...; and (b) use gel filtration to separate
out some of the proteins that are NOT too close apart in size...we are
using the pharmacia gels in our lab; specifically the g-50 for my purposes
of desalting.  my question has to do with trying to give some good detail
to my protocol...i already know about what length of column to pour,
column packing and stuff like that.  my question is after i have poured my
column and packed it, how do i replace the buffer the gel is in (20%
ethanol)  with my eluent buffer (i.e. the final buffer i want my protein
to be in)...do i just repeatedly wash the column with my eluent buffer?
if so, then wont the salts in my eluent buffer get retarded in the gel
matrix (i.e. the pores)??  wont this just result in the salts taken out of
my eluent buffer?  how, then, does this cause the column to be
"equilibrated" with my eluent buffer?  also, when i run my protein samples
thru it, how does my protein then go thru its buffer exchange?  i can
understand that any salts that the current buffer the protein is in will
get trapped and the protein will flow thru...wont it end up coming out in
just water then?  i would appreciate it if someone can clarify this for
me...thx much...cheers...

Arioch (sai@topaz.microbio.uab.edu)
Graduate Student ( and Lord of Chaos...)
Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics...
Milieu of Entropy (a.k.a University of Alabama at Birmingham...)


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Aug 02 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.alt.net!news1.alt.net!news.exodus.net!www1.hlc.net!ppp3.dialup.peakaccess.net!user
From: wdspiv@peakaccess.net (Warren D. Spivack)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Cathepsin D
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 18:28:26 -0400
Organization: None
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <wdspiv-2907961828260001@ppp3.dialup.peakaccess.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp3.dialup.peakaccess.net
X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0.1

Does anybody know the cleavage specificity for Cathepsin D?
Need this info a.s.a.p.

-- 
"When the bough breaks the cradle will fall...

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Aug 02 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!news.doit.wisc.edu!klenchin
From: klenchin@facstaff.wisc.edu (Dima Klenchin)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Discussion:questions about gel filtration...
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 96 04:23:41 GMT
Organization: UW-Madison
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <4u154l$2kqg@news.doit.wisc.edu>
References: <Pine.SGI.3.93.960803204858.7856A-100000@topaz.microbio.uab.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: f182-117.net.wisc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.0 Beta #2
X-No-Archive: Yes

In article 
<Pine.SGI.3.93.960803204858.7856A-100000@topaz.microbio.uab.edu>, Arioch 
<sai@topaz.microbio.uab.edu> wrote:
#hey all,
#        ...cant seem to get a straight answer out of the other people in
#my lab, so i'll try here...ok..after having tried dialysis  and the
#ultrafree concentration device and not having too much success with them,
#i've turned to gel filtration to (a).desalt my protein sample/buffer
#exchange into buffer of choice...; and (b) use gel filtration to separate
#out some of the proteins that are NOT too close apart in size...we are
#using the pharmacia gels in our lab; specifically the g-50 for my purposes
#of desalting. 

For small volumes (> 200 ul) spin columns work best with no dilutions.
Alternatively, you can try PD-10 columns from Pharmacia (<2.5 ml loading).
In both cases, Sephadex G-25 is used and works better for desalting of
protein solutions.  

# my question has to do with trying to give some good detail
#to my protocol...i already know about what length of column to pour,
#column packing and stuff like that.  my question is after i have poured my
#column and packed it, how do i replace the buffer the gel is in (20%
#ethanol)  with my eluent buffer (i.e. the final buffer i want my protein
#to be in)...do i just repeatedly wash the column with my eluent buffer?

Yes. At least 5 (better 10) column volumes.

#if so, then wont the salts in my eluent buffer get retarded in the gel
#matrix (i.e. the pores)??  wont this just result in the salts taken out of
#my eluent buffer?  how, then, does this cause the column to be
#"equilibrated" with my eluent buffer?  

Everything gets retarded to some extent. That's why *many* volumes of
equilibration. After a while, concentration of everything inside and 
outside beads becomes equal, i.e. equibrated. 

#also, when i run my protein samples
#thru it, how does my protein then go thru its buffer exchange?  i can
#understand that any salts that the current buffer the protein is in will
#get trapped and the protein will flow thru...wont it end up coming out in
#just water then?  

No, it won't. It'll come out in the buffer with which the column was 
equilibrated AND eluted. 

To help you out with understanding how gel filtration works in it's 
extreme (and simplest) case of desalting works, I can give an
example that illustrates the principle: imagine that you have a beaker 
full with protein in solution A and a sponge with pores that do not allow 
the protein to get into it. You want to change the solution to B. What you 
do is: 
1. soak the sponge (it absorbes, say, 1/2 of total volume), remove it and 
add solution B to the beaker. Now you have 50% of each A,B).
2. sqeeze the sponge, soak again, and fill with B again (easy to see that
now you have 75% B and 25% A).
        Repeat 1, 2 until you have only acceptable traces of A in a beaker 
full with protein dissolved now in B.

That's how column gel filtration works but instead of repeating the same 
procedure with many sponges (or sqeezing one repeatedly), you pack them
in a huge pile and force the solution to go through them sequentially 
(= column). 

- Dima


 





From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Aug 02 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!nature.berkeley.edu!lhom
From: lhom@nature.berkeley.edu (Louis Hom)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts
Subject: Continuous gel ref
Date: 4 Aug 1996 05:20:50 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <4u1bvi$ah4@agate.berkeley.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nature.berkeley.edu
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.proteins:8437 bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:47602

Can someone point me to a good reference on continuous buffer systems for
PAGE?  TIA.
-- 
_______________________________________________________________________________
Lou Hom >K '93		       	    	     "Putney is confusing obscenity 	
lhom@nature.berkeley.edu  		      with originality." 
http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~lhom	       	  -- Myron X in "Putney Swope"

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sat Aug 03 23:00:00 1996
Newsgroups: ebi.announce,bionet.general,bionet.molbio.embldatabank,bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molecules.peptides,embnet.general
Path: biosci!daresbury!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!ebi.ac.uk!saturn.ebi.ac.uk!apweiler
From: apweiler@saturn.ebi.ac.uk (Rolf Apweiler)
Subject: ANNOUNCEMENT: Second Beta release of TREMBL, a supplement to SWISS-PROT 
Sender: news@ebi.ac.uk (Mr news)
Message-ID: <DvGtAA.BKE@ebi.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 15:20:34 GMT
Lines: 81
Reply-To: apweiler@saturn.ebi.ac.uk (Rolf Apweiler)
Organization: European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL) - UK
X-Newsreader: mxrn 6.18-31
Keywords: Protein database
Xref: biosci bionet.general:22893 bionet.molbio.embldatabank:666 bionet.molbio.proteins:8439 bionet.molecules.peptides:393


Second Beta release of TREMBL, a protein sequence database supplementing 
the SWISS-PROT Protein Sequence Data Bank


INTRODUCTION
============

TREMBL is a protein sequence database supplementing the SWISS-PROT Protein
Sequence Data Bank. TREMBL contains the translations of all coding 
sequences (CDS) present in the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database not 
integrated in SWISS-PROT. At the moment we treat TREMBL as an independent 
dataset in SWISS-PROT format, but shortly TREMBL will become a part of 
SWISS-PROT. 


SECOND BETA RELEASE OF TREMBL
=============================

This TREMBL release is created from the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database 
release 47 and contains 107'065 sequence entries, comprising 28'667'743 amino 
acids.

TREMBL is split in two main sections; SP-TREMBL and REM-TREMBL:

SP-TREMBL (SWISS-PROT TREMBL) contains the entries (89'883) which should be 
incorporated into SWISS-PROT. SP-TREMBL is partially redundant against 
SWISS-PROT, since approximately 40'000 SP-TREMBL entries are only 
additional sequence reports of proteins already in SWISS-PROT. We will try 
to merge these sequence reports as fast as possible with the already 
existing SWISS-PROT entries for these proteins, so as to make SWISS-PROT
and TREMBL completely nonredundant.
SP-TREMBL is organized in subsections:

fun.dat (Fungi):                4939 entries
hum.dat (Human):                5985 entries
inv.dat (Invertebrates):       11476 entries
mam.dat (Other Mammals):        2096 entries
mhc.dat (MHC proteins):         2221 entries
org.dat (Organelles):           6466 entries
phg.dat (Bacteriophages):        928 entries
Pln.dat (Plants):               5790 entries
pro.dat (Prokaryotes):         17393 entries
rod.dat (Rodents):              5473 entries
unc.dat (Unclassified):          243 entries
vrl.dat (Viruses):             24595 entries
vrt.dat (Other Vertebrates):    2278 entries


REM-TREMBL (REMaining TREMBL) contains the entries (17'182) that we do 
not want to include in SWISS-PROT.

ACCESS/DATA DISTRIBUTION
========================

FTP server:     ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/trembl

TREMBL is also available on the SWISS-PROT CD-ROM.



TREMBL HAS BEEN PREPARED BY:
============================

Rolf Apweiler, Alain Gateau, Vivien Junker, Fiona Lang, Claire O'Donovan,
and Nicoletta Mitaritonna at the EMBL Outstation - European Bioinformatics
Institute (EBI) in Hinxton, UK;
Amos Bairoch at the Medical Biochemistry Department of the University 
of Geneva.

=======================================================================
Rolf Apweiler                           | 
EMBL Outstation                         | Email:apweiler@ebi.ac.uk
European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) | URL:  http://www.ebi.ac.uk
Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton   | Tel:  +44 (1223) 494435
Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK                  | Fax:  +44 (1223) 494968
========================================================================





From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 04 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!news
From: Paul Digard <pd1@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts
Subject: Re: Continuous gel ref
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 1996 17:46:40 +0000
Organization: University of Cambridge, England
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <32063380.5132@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk>
References: <4u1bvi$ah4@agate.berkeley.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mac08.vrl.path.cam.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
To: Louis Hom <lhom@nature.berkeley.edu>
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.proteins:8441 bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:47635

Louis Hom wrote:
> 
> Can someone point me to a good reference on continuous buffer systems for
> PAGE?  TIA.
> --


 McClellan, T. (1982). Electrophoresis buffers for polyacrylamide 
gels at various pH. Anal. Biochem. 126, 94-99.

This might be helpfull?

Paul Digard

Division of Virology
Department of Pathology
University of Cambridge

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 04 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: jmerelo@kal-el.ugr.es (J.J. Merelo Guervos)
Newsgroups: bionet.software,bionet.molbio.proteins,comp.ai.neural-nets
Subject: [Web]: protein 2ary structure from CD spectra using NNs
Date: 5 Aug 1996 15:34:54 -0700
Organization: GeNeura Team
Lines: 48
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <51raprl7l6.fsf@kal-el.ugr.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net
Xref: biosci bionet.software:16239 bionet.molbio.proteins:8444 comp.ai.neural-nets:23410


Dear usenetters:

We announce the establishment of a web server for prediction of
protein secondary structure percentages from UV circular dichroism
spectra. You only need to submit 41 CD values ranging from 200 nm 
to 240 nm (given in deg cm^2 dmol^-1 multiplied by 0.001) and
the server gives back the estimated percentages of helix, beta and
rest of secondary structure of your protein plus an estimation of
the accuracy of the prediction.

The prediction is done using a Kohonen neural network with a 2-dimensional 
output layer. The algorithm has been published [1, 2] and possitively 
referenced in a recent review [3]. The program itself (k2d) can be
retrieved by anonymous ftp (see the k2d home page for details). 

The http address of the k2d server is:
http://kal-el.ugr.es/k2d/spectra.html

The home page of the k2d program is at:
http://kal-el.ugr.es/k2d/k2d.html
or at
http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/~andrade/k2d.html

As the server just began we would be very grateful in
receiving your feedback about it.

J.J. Merelo
M.A. Andrade




References

[1] Merelo, J.J., M.A. Andrade, A. Prieto and F. Moran. 1994. 
Neurocomputing. 6, 443-454 

[2] Andrade, M.A., P. Chacon, J.J. Merelo and F. Moran. 1993. 
Prot. Eng. 6, 383-390 

[3] Greenfield, N.J. 1996. 
Anal. Biochem., 235, 1-10 

-- 
JJ Merelo                         | http://kal-el.ugr.es/htbin/jj-plex
Grupo Geneura ---- Univ. Granada  | http://kal-el.ugr.es/


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 04 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!warwick!news.nott.ac.uk!NewsWatcher!user
From: kevin.bailey@nottingham.ac.uk ()
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Cathepsin D
Followup-To: bionet.molbio.proteins
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 1996 12:31:16 +0100
Organization: Cripps Computing Centre, The University of Nottingham
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <kevin.bailey-050896123116@128.243.183.238>
References: <wdspiv-2907961828260001@ppp3.dialup.peakaccess.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpbjwk1.biochem.nottingham.ac.uk

In article <wdspiv-2907961828260001@ppp3.dialup.peakaccess.net>,
wdspiv@peakaccess.net (Warren D. Spivack) wrote:

> Does anybody know the cleavage specificity for Cathepsin D?
> Need this info a.s.a.p.

		Don't know if this is much use but I think cathepsins sequencially remove
dipeptides from the N-terminal end of proteins, but I'm not sure how
specific they are, I think that an N-terminal lys or arg will block
cathepsin C from removing dipeptides. The only ref I know of for cath.D is
Barrett in Biochemical Journal vol 117 p.601 (but it's an old ref, may be a
lot more info known these days). 

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 04 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!bioftp.unibas.ch!ubaclu.unibas.ch!ubaclu.unibas.ch!nntp
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: NMR post-doc positions -> Biozentrum, U. Basel, Switzerland
Message-ID: <32066C01.167E@ubaclu.unibas.ch>
From: andrei <alexandrescu@ubaclu.unibas.ch>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 1996 23:47:45 +0200
Nntp-Posting-Host: nmr.bioz.unibas.ch
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b5aGold (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP17)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 62

Applications are invited for two Biomolecular-NMR post doctoral
positions in the Department of Structural Biology of the Biozentrum,
University of Basel - Switzerland. Persons who have received a Ph.D.
within the last 6 months, or who expect to receive their Ph.D. within 3
months are strongly preferred. 

One position is for a person with a technical NMR background.  The
applicant should have strong computational skills, and extensive
experience in programming multidimensional heteronuclear NMR pulse
sequences in a UNIX environment.

The second position is for an NMR spectroscopist with a molecular
biology background.  Applicants should ideally have hands-on experience
with PCR, mutagenesis, T7 expression systems, 13C/15N isotopic labeling,
and protein purification.

In addition, outstanding candidates with a primary interest in protein 
folding and original ideas on how to make progress with THE PROBLEM 
are also strongly encouraged to apply.

Our group's current research interests include:

1)  Folding and dynamics of non-homologous proteins that share an 
OB-fold structural motif.

2)  Protein engineering.

3)  Isotopically labeled peptides for NMR studies of
peptide-protein        
complexes.

4)  NMR structure determination.


NMR experiments will be carried out on a dedicated 600 MHz Varian 
Unity-Plus spectrometer, on which our group (3 NMR users) has 30 % 
measurement time.  This instrument is equipped with pulse field 
gradients, triple resonance probes, and 4 channels for multidimensional 
heteronuclear experiments.  An SGI Crimson, and INDY computer are 
available for NMR data processing and analysis.

Successful candidate should be highly motivated, and should have a 
track-record of original publications.

Interested and qualified applicants should send a C.V. as well as the 
names and addresses of 3 referees familiar with the applicant's work to: 

Dr. Andrei T. Alexandrescu
Biozentrum
University of Basel
Klingelbergstrasse 70
Basel/Switzerland
CH-4056

Tel: 41-61-267-2091
Fax: 41-61-267-2109

email: alexandrescu@ubaclu.unibas.ch 


Use of Fax or e-mail is appreciated, and will expedite responses to
inquiries.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 04 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!NANOTHINC.COM!tess
From: tess@NANOTHINC.COM (Tess Mercer)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Nanobiology Call for Papers
Date: 5 Aug 1996 14:25:40 -0700
Organization: Nanothinc
Lines: 57
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <32060527.42B8@nanothinc.com>
Reply-To: tess@nanothinc.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Topical Overview:

Call for Papers - 
Nanobiology:  Research, Theory, and Current
Applications                  

Nanotechnology, as a general topic, covers a very wide array
of different disciplines and areas of research.  However, in
the realm of biological and biomolecular applications and 
developments, there are a number of current examples,
including some commercial applications, which are reshaping
the approach to which previously difficult, or even "unsolvable"
procedures can now be resolved, or greatly improved upon.

It is specifically in the realm of thoeretical, near term, or currently
available technologies, and how they are affected by application
of "nanobiological" processes, that will be reviewed in this
section of the journal.   By definition, a nanobiological 
process could be described, in this context, as any process
which utilizes the contrived manipulation of individual 
biomolecules or biomolecular structures to fullfill a desired task,
create an object, a material or application of a material,
or as an intermediate step in fullfilling a multistaged 
series of assembly or construction tasks involving biomolecular
materials.

This definition could also be expanded to include the methodologies
of visualiztion or detection of nanoscale activities in a 
biomolecular environment, or in the development of instrumentation
and processes related to these tasks.

Also, there are other tangential aspects of nanobiological
processes which are also relevant, and deserve attention.
Particularly in the areas of potential nanoscale computing
or information processing applications which may utilize
or incorporate biological components or processes, there has 
been considerable interest and research ativities.

Please let us know if you are interested. Information about our company,
Nanothinc, can be found at http://www.nanothinc.com. 

Also, I have additional Notes for Contributors which I can fax to your
attention.

Sincerely,



Maritess T. Mercer
Director of Administration
Project Manager
Nanothinc
1797 Union Street                           
San Francisco, CA 94123
Tel:  (415) 202-9969, Fax: (415) 202-9975
URL: http://www.nanothinc.com
Email:  tess@nanothinc.com

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 04 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.biu.ac.il!news.huji.ac.il!avdat3.bgu.ac.il!usenet
From: irisp@bgumail.bgu.ac.il (Iris Porat)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Participation on confrence "Thermophiles '96', sep, 96, Athens
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 1996 20:00:02 GMT
Organization: Ben Gurion University
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <32065204.4499656@news.bgu.ac.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bgumail.bgu.ac.il
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141

I will participate on the conference Thermophiles '96. I will rent a
room for 13$ for night. The hostel is located about 10 miles from
Athens (15 minute by car). I will rent a car, for 20$ for day.
I am looking for a travel companion. 

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 04 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: BIOSCI Administrator <biosci-help@net.bio.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Research Diagnostics, Inc. sponsors BIOSCI!
Date: 5 Aug 1996 17:40:14 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 47
Sender: biohelp@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4u649e$nl0@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

We are pleased to welcome a new sponsor of the BIOSCI project

     Research Diagnostics, Inc., distributor of fine immunochemical
        products

Research Diagnostics is sponsoring the CELL-BIOLOGY, DIAGNOSTICS,
IMMUNOLOGY, and PROTEIN-ANALYSIS groups.  You can view their ads on
those groups by visiting our WWW archives at
http://www.bio.net/archives.html.  Please thank them for their support
of BIOSCI if you contact them.

This is our complete list of sponsors:

     Molecular Dynamics, Inc., a leading producer of innovative
        instrumentation systems for the life sciences 
     Knight-Ridder Information, Inc., a major provider of electronic
        information to business, research, and scientific professionals
     BIOSIS, publisher of Biological Abstracts and Zoological Record
     CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc., a leading manufacturer of
        innovative reagents and kits for the life sciences
     The UnCover Company, an internationally-known firm that offers
        article delivery and current issue alerting from 17,000 periodicals.
     LI-COR, Inc., manufacturer of automated infrared DNA sequencing
        and genetic analysis systems.
     The Nest Group, Inc. a value-added distributor of HPLC columns, DNA
        kits, and electrophoresis gels for biomolecule separation.
     Sun Microsystems, Inc., a leading provider of solutions for
        open network computing environments.
     Academic Press, a leading scientific publisher for more than 50 years.
     QIAGEN, a leading provider of innovative, user-friendly technologies
        for nucleic acid and protein purification. 
     Trends in Biochemical Sciences, the leading monthly magazine in
        biochemisty and molecular biology.
     Research Diagnostics, Inc., distributor of fine immunochemical
        products

The assistance of these organizations will allow us to continue to
provide our service to you beyond the end of our grant this year.
Please thank our sponsors for their support of BIOSCI in your
communications with them.

				Sincerely,

				Dave Kristofferson
				BIOSCI/bionet Manager

				biosci-help@net.bio.net

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Aug 05 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!in2p3.fr!swidir.switch.ch!scsing.switch.ch!swsbe6.switch.ch!surfnet.nl!highway.leidenuniv.nl!ruly46!mirihyel
From: Peter Hohenstein <mirihyel@ruly46.medfac.leidenuniv.nl>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: custom made knock out mice
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 1996 11:11:44 +0200
Organization: Leiden University, The Netherlands
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960805111115.11408D-100000@ruly46>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ruly46.medfac.leidenuniv.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: mirihyel@ruly46

Hello,

I'm looking for companies who make mice from (alreaddy targeted) ES
cells. Does anybody have information on this?

Thanks in advance.

Peter Hohenstein
Dept. Human Genetics
University of Leiden
The Netherlands



                   





From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Aug 05 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!usenet
From: "Brett S. Phinney" <brettsp@mail.utexas.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Protein precipitation and detergent
Date: 6 Aug 1996 13:38:20 GMT
Organization: University of Texas
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <01bb839c$899e2440$6a715380@UT.cc.utexas.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: slip-c-10.ots.utexas.edu
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1132

I know this topic was just discussed, but I was curious if chloroform
methanol precipitation of protein will remove detergents such as SDS or
Triton X, has anyone had any experience with this.


Thanks  a lot

-- 
Brett Phinney
Cell Research Institute
University of Texas, Austin

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Aug 05 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: a.c.noorlandt@chem.ruu.nl (Albert Noorlandt)
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics,bionet.cellbiol,bionet.immunology,bionet.metabolic-reg,bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molbio.proteins.7tms_r,alt.med,alt.pharm,sci.bio.misc,sci.chem,sci.chem.analytical,sci.med,sci.misc,sci.techniques
Subject: 1997 FEBS Meeting on Cell Signalling Mechanisms
Date: 6 Aug 1996 17:24:42 -0700
Organization: CBLE
Lines: 29
Sender: biohelp@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <a.c.noorlandt-0608961446360001@cble89.chem.ruu.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net
Xref: biosci bionet.biophysics:2198 bionet.cellbiol:5225 bionet.immunology:9491 bionet.metabolic-reg:805 bionet.molbio.ageing:2916 bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:47700 bionet.molbio.proteins:8451 bionet.molbio.proteins.7tms_r:804 sci.bio.misc:4117 sci.chem:61653 sci.chem.analytical:5118 sci.med:133749 sci.misc:12601

FEBS Special Meeting on
Cell Signalling Mechanisms, From membrane to nucleus
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 29­July 3, 1997

Everything you want to know about this meeting on www-page:

   http://www.cble.chem.ruu.nl/febs97/index.html

The meeting will cover the following topics:
€  Tyrosine kinases
€  MAP-, Ser/Thr-kinases
€  G-coupled receptors
€  Lymphokine receptors
€  Ras, Rac, Rho-proteins
€  Ca2+, cGMP, NO
€  Lipid signalling
€  Steroid receptors
€  Transcription factors
€  Cell cycle, Apoptosis

For further information contact:
Secretariat FEBS Special Meeting 1997
Lidy Groot Congress Events
P.O. Box 83005
1080 AA Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel. +31.20.679 3218
Fax: +31.20.675 8236
Email: lidy.groot@inter.nl.net

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Aug 05 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!MANI.CBS.UMN.EDU!npv
From: npv@MANI.CBS.UMN.EDU (Nora Plesofsky-Vig)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: re:protein precipitation
Date: 6 Aug 1996 11:21:22 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 6
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <9608061821.AA00675@mani.cbs.umn.edu>
Reply-To: nora@biosci.cbs.umn.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

I have used ethanol (4 vol) to precipitate proteins away from Triton  
X-100 (with 1 ethanol wash) for running the proteins in SDS PAGE. It  
works well enough for this purpose, but I don't know how much Triton  
is left behind.

Nora Plesofsky-Vig

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Aug 05 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.uth.tmc.edu!exrady335.mdacc.tmc.edu!ylek
From: ylek@utmdacc.uth.tmc.edu (David Voehringer)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Cytochrome C antibody
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 14:46:09
Organization: University of Texas Health Science Center
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <ylek.57.000EC554@utmdacc.uth.tmc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: exrady335.mdacc.tmc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]

Does anyone know where I could find a anti-mouse Cytochrome C antibody??
David W. Voehringer
Department of Experimental Radiotherapy
Univ. of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
1515 Holcombe Bvld.
Houston, Tx. 77030
(713) 792-3797

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Aug 06 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!pendragon!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in3.uu.net!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!agate!hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk!news.cuhk.edu.hk!news.hklink.net!icon1.intercon.net!usenet
From: TPM <ctsngai@icon.intercon.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: chemifluorescence vs chemiluminescence
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 1996 18:18:43 -0700
Organization: CTS
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <32094073.169F@icon.intercon.net>
Reply-To: ctsngai@icon.intercon.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: anp5.intercon.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b6 (Win95; I; 16bit)

Hi Everybody,

Does anyone compare the methods "Chemifluorescence" and
"Chemiluminescence"? What are the pros and cons of these methods? The
experience from all the existing user is most welcomed.

Thanks.


TPM

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Aug 06 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!surfnet.nl!highway.leidenuniv.nl!ruly46!mirihyel
From: Peter Hohenstein <mirihyel@ruly46.medfac.leidenuniv.nl>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: glycine strand in tagged protein
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 17:02:56 +0200
Organization: Leiden University, The Netherlands
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960807165628.27761A-100000@ruly46>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ruly46.medfac.leidenuniv.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: mirihyel@ruly46

Hello,

I'm working on the expression of a cDNA  in 3T3 and I intend to tag this
protein C terminally with the HA tag. Somebody told me about putting
several glycine residues between the protein of interest and the tag, the
idea being that glycine is the smallest amino acid and therefor has the
best 'moving' capacity. In this way the tag would be maximum available for
the antibodies.

However, the person who told me this had no idea where he had it from, and
I can't find any references on it. So my questions are: does anybody have
experience with this, and if so, how many glycines should I put between
protein and HA-tag?

Any information on this would be appreciated!

Peter Hohenstein
Dept. Human Genetics
University of Leiden
The Netherlands





From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Aug 06 23:00:00 1996
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!warwick!yama.mcc.ac.uk!liv!woodie
From: woodie@liverpool.ac.uk (Dr I.P. Woodrow)
Subject: Re: chemifluorescence vs chemiluminescence
Message-ID: <DvrwqI.J0p@liverpool.ac.uk>
Sender: news@liverpool.ac.uk (News System)
Nntp-Posting-Host: ash-22.liv.ac.uk
Organization: The University of Liverpool
References:  <32094073.169F@icon.intercon.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 15:08:41 GMT
Lines: 43

In article <32094073.169F@icon.intercon.net>, TPM <ctsngai@icon.intercon.net> writes:
> Hi Everybody,
> 
> Does anyone compare the methods "Chemifluorescence" and
> "Chemiluminescence"? What are the pros and cons of these methods? The
> experience from all the existing user is most welcomed.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> TPM

The major difference is that fluorescence is due to absorbed light being 
re-emitted at a lower wavewlength (and doesn't need the "chemi" as it naturally 
occurs in chemicals anyway) , whilst chemiluminsecence is the production of 
photons of light throught chemical reactions. This means that you have to 
"excite" fluorescent molecules with light to see them, whilst chemiluminsecence
occurs only when the relevant chemicals are mixed (the most commonly encountered
lab example of this is in luciferase from fireflies).

With fluorescence you often get some background interference from the incident 
(excitation) light as there is often some overlap in the wavelength peaks. It is
 very sensitive technique all the same. Fluorescent dyes are tailored to a 
range of uses, so you should have no problem finding what you need.

I have less experience with chemiluminescence. You are certainly limited by 
the applications as luminescent reactions are pretty rare if memory serves.
Havbing said this it shouldbe more sensitive than fluorecence as there is no 
incident radiation (there are likelty to be other practical considerations to
this as there always are!)

Fluorescence is usually measured on a fluorimeter (oddly enough!), with the 
fluorescence measured usualy at 90 deg to the incident light to minimise 
interference from this. Luminescence can be measured on a scintilation counter 
(scintillation is avery similar phenomenon). Also flashier (no pun intended!)
fluorimters can measure luminescence.

Hope this is some help!


Iain



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Aug 06 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!howland.erols.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!hunter.premier.net!news.cais.net!nntp.uio.no!news.kth.se!news
From: Arne Elofsson <arne@rune.biokemi.su.se>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molec-model
Subject: Prediction servers and predictions
Date: 07 Aug 1996 11:38:25 +0200
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <ygbsp9z7cvi.fsf@rune.biokemi.su.se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rune.biokemi.su.se
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.2.37/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.proteins:8453 bionet.molec-model:1100


Dear netters

I will teach a course in "Theoretical DNA and Protein analysis" and as
more and more of the tools get available over the WWW I will focus on
using the WWW to analyze the sequence/protein you are interested in.

The students will work on a small set of selected sequence and use the
WWW to try to find out as much as possible about these proteins. In a
way it is similar to what Tim Hubbard and Anna Tramontano did but on a
much smaller scale. We will use this course as a test of different
servers that are available over the net. A summary evaluating the
different servers will be published on the net.

SO I would rally appreciate
1) Any server that you want the students to use and test. 
   (If you have a small, easy to use and fast program that you want
ous to test we can provide a WWW interface for the server)
2) Any comprehensive list of servers and others related links.
3) Any protein sequence that you want the students to work on. 

thank you a lot


arne

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
      From: Arne Elofsson         Email: arne@rune.biokemi.su.se
      Tel:+46(0)8-161553   WWW:  http://www.biokemi.su.se/~arne/

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Aug 06 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!EU.net!main.Germany.EU.net!fu-berlin.de!informatik.tu-muenchen.de!lrz-muenchen.de!uni-regensburg.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de!phoenix.mgen.uni-heidelberg.de!chw
From: Christoph H. Winter <chw@sirius.mgen.uni-heidelberg.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Large MW Standard f. SDSPAGE
Date: 7 Aug 1996 08:25:27 GMT
Organization: Molecular Genetics
Lines: 11
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4u9jtn$blt@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: phoenix.mgen.uni-heidelberg.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Nuntius 2.0.4_68K
X-XXMessage-ID: <AE2E1F97370133F3@phoenix.mgen.uni-heidelberg.de>
X-XXDate: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 08:25:27 GMT

I need a super-high-marker protein standard for SDS-PAGE (200-300kd).
Does anybody know (available)  proteins which work in this range to
supplement a normal high marker?


Thank you in advance

Christoph                   

---
< mailto:chw@sirius.mgen.uni-heidelberg.de >

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Aug 06 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in3.uu.net!gwu.edu!mnrao
From: mnrao@gwis2.circ.gwu.edu (Manjunath N.Rao)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Protein binding to its ligand
Date: 7 Aug 1996 19:55:17 GMT
Organization: The George Washington University, Washington DC
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <4uasb5$au5@cronkite.seas.gwu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.164.127.252
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Hello Everyone,
I am experiencing a strange problem  in studying the ligand binding 
property of a protein isolated recently. This protein binds a hydrophobic 
lipid ligand ( a small moleculae with a mol wt. of 600).  I have 
conducted one experiment wherein I have incubated increasing amounts of 
the radioactive ligand alone and radioactive ligand plus 20 fold excess 
of cold ligand with the protein concentration also increasing 
proportionately.   I expected to find out the specific binding as well as
 protein to ligand (p:l) binding ratio.  However, I now find that at lower 
protein concentration the ratio of p:l is very high (1:16) and as protein 
concentration increases the p:l ratio decreases and almost reaches 1:1.
I would like to know whether anyone of you have heard of or experienced 
such a property in a ligand binding  protein.
I appreciate any help in this regard.  Thanks in advance
MNR.
--
*******************************

*************************

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Aug 06 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!altitude!usenet
From: Achim Recktenwald <achim@ibex.ca>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Discussion:questions about gel filtration...
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 1996 08:15:34 -0500
Organization: IBEX Technologies, Inc., Biochemistry, 5485 Pare, Montreal, PQ, H4P 1P7, Canada
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <320896F6.4BA@ibex.ca>
References: <Pine.SGI.3.93.960803204858.7856A-100000@topaz.microbio.uab.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ibex.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
To: Arioch <sai@topaz.microbio.uab.edu>

Arioch wrote:
> 
[snip]
>  my question is after i have poured my
> column and packed it, how do i replace the buffer the gel is in (20%
> ethanol)  with my eluent buffer (i.e. the final buffer i want my protein
> to be in)...do i just repeatedly wash the column with my eluent buffer?


With gel filtration, esp. these Sephadex gels,  it is a very bad move to introduce 
ethanol. I usually use a Buchner funnel or a glass-frit to get my gel into the 
buffer i want and then make my column. But before I pour the column, I degass the 
gel very thoroughly. This is a very important step.
If you have your gel already in the column but in etanol, you will never succeed in 
removing all the air-bubbles in those pores deep in the gel. But these pores are 
the most important for the efficiency of the gel filtratrion.

I would recommend to unpack your column, get the gel into the right buffer, degass 
it, and pour it again. After that I would use ~2CV to wash the column with your 
running buffer.

If you want to keep the column for further runs, store it in PBS with some azide. 
Before using it again you should wash it with ~10CV of buffer.

Achim

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Aug 06 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!CSHL.ORG!leemor
From: leemor@CSHL.ORG (Leemor Joshua-Tor)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: postdoctoral position at Cold Spring Harbor
Date: 7 Aug 1996 06:21:57 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 49
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <v01530502ae2e037f5b57@[143.48.60.60]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

POSTDOCTORAL POSITION in STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
at COLD SPRING HARBOR


A postdoctoral position is available at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in
either of two areas:

        1. Structural and biochemical studies of a unique DNA-binding
protease. Gal6 (yeast bleomycin hydrolase) is a conserved protease that
limits the use of the anti-cancer drug bleomycin. We are combining
structural and biochemical information of the protein, its complexes and
various mutants, along with yeast molecular biology and genetics which is
done in collaboration with Stephen Johnston at Southwestern Medical Center
at Dallas, to study its functions and conserved cellular role. See:
        L. Joshua-Tor, H. E. Xu, S. A. Johnston and D. C. Rees, Crystal
Structure of a Conserved Protease That Binds DNA: The Bleomycin Hydrolase,
Gal6, Science, 269, 945-950 (1995).

        2. Structural studies of complexes of eukaryotic transcription
factors. We are combining structural studies with genetic information to
study the molecular interactions important for transcriptional activation
in eukaryotes.

Our X-ray crystallography facilities include an R-axis detector equipped
with an Oxford cryosystem, several graphics workstations and have access to
the nearby National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS) at Brookhaven. We also
have state-of-the-art facilities for carrying out biochemical and molecular
biology studies. Cold Spring Harbor provides a unique stimulating
environment for rich scientific interactions.

The positions are available for highly motivated applicants with a Ph. D.
and experience in either: (a) protein crystallography or a related field;
or (b) those with experience in biochemistry or molecular biology and a
keen interest in protein crystallography and structural biology. Please
send CV, list of publications, a summary of research experience and
interests, and names and numbers of three references to Dr. Leemor
Joshua-Tor, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, P. O. Box 100, Cold Spring
Harbor, NY 11724. Tel. (516) 367 8821. For additional information please
call or send e-mail to leemor@cshl.org


*******************************************************************
  Leemor Joshua-Tor, Ph.D.
  Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory           Tel. (516) 367 8821
  1 Bungtown Road                         Fax  (516) 367 8873
  Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724            e-mail: leemor@cshl.org
*******************************************************************



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Aug 07 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!warwick!leicester!usenet
From: "Dr E. Buxbaum" <EB15@le.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Protein precipitation and detergent
Date: 8 Aug 1996 09:42:52 GMT
Organization: University of Leicester, UK (PCFS User)
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <4uccqs$39f@falcon.le.ac.uk>
References: <01bb839c$899e2440$6a715380@UT.cc.utexas.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc47.msb.le.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)

It does. The problem usually is to get the protein back into solution 
afterwards.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Aug 07 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!usenet.cis.ufl.edu!usenet.ufl.edu!cybernet.cse.fau.edu!usenet
From: Dr Peter Lutz <lutz@acc.fau.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: HELP protein analysis
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 1996 13:39:51 -0400
Organization: Florida Atlantic University
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <3208D4E7.165F@acc.fau.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bsmac03.sci.fau.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC)

I am trying to measure monoamine concentration in brain tissue
and report it in ng/mg protein. I am using an extraction procedure to
quantify the monoamines. Does anyone know of a method or a source
where I can find a mthod to help with this procedure?

You can reach me either at the above e-mail address or
 at dbrager@gate.net

Thanks for all your help,

Darrin Brager
Florida Atlantic University



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Aug 07 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!newsgate.duke.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!warwick!bham!usenet
From: T.M.Franklin@bham.ac.uk (Tanya)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Histone 1 Ab
Date: 8 Aug 1996 14:17:07 GMT
Organization: The University of Birmingham, UK
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <4ucst3$9bd@sun4.bham.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcs124.bham.ac.uk
X-Newsreader: WinVN version 0.80

Dear All,

Is there anyone out there who has an antibody raised to histone 1, preferably
the concerved region. I have a protein which I suspect might be a histone and
I need to be able to confirm or disprove the posibility of its being a Histone 1.
I have sent the protein for amino acid analysis but would like to be able to
provide further prof.

Thanks in advance, Tan.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Aug 07 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!crick.bms.com!usenet
From: "Patricia W. Cash" <cash@bms.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: glycine strand in tagged protein
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 1996 08:16:13 -0700
Organization: Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <320A04BD.457@bms.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960807165628.27761A-100000@ruly46>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 140.176.114.56
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I)

Peter Hohenstein wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm working on the expression of a cDNA  in 3T3 and I intend to tag this
> protein C terminally with the HA tag. Somebody told me about putting
> several glycine residues between the protein of interest and the tag, 


Peter,

We've used a spacer amino acid such as amino caproic acid to separate 
peptides or proteins from tags.  The amino caproic acid is convenient 
because it's added in one step and it seemed to give enough distance so 
as not to interfere with the binding of the protein. 

Pat

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Aug 07 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in3.uu.net!newsfeed.pitt.edu!newsflash.concordia.ca!news.mcgill.ca!VM1.MCGILL.CA
From: Susan James <CYHB000@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Tryptic digest problems
Date: 08 AUG 96 16:43:56 EST
Organization: McGill University
Lines: 35
Sender: usenet@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA
Message-ID: <08AUG96.18070864.0093@VM1.MCGILL.CA>
References: <01bb7e20$2afd09a0$5d715380@UT.cc.utexas.edu> <tedmunds-0108961235410001@10.0.2.15>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vm1.mcgill.ca

In article <tedmunds-0108961235410001@10.0.2.15> tedmunds@world.std.com (Tim Edmunds) writes:
>In article <01bb7e20$2afd09a0$5d715380@UT.cc.utexas.edu>, "Brett S.
>Phinney" <brettsp@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if anybody had any experience doing tryptic digests using
>> SDS-PAGE and reversed phase HPLC to separate their protein fragments. I'm
>> trying to digest 2 proteins, and collect and sequence the fragments, the
>> problem is that when I digest the protein and run it on an SDS-PAGE gel I
>> see what I consider is a good digestion if not complete, i.e. the two
>> places where the proteins should be are now gone. But when I run the same
>> sample on an HPLC using a 2 mm C-18 column, I see 1 big peek and a few
>> smaller ones. The big peek is about 50-100 times bigger then the smaller
>> ones. Could it be possible that all of my fragments are co-eluting, or I'm
>> not getting a good digestion. If I'm not getting a good digestion, then why
>> do I not see any of my original protein, or at least very large fragments,
>> when I run them on a gel. I should get about 30 fragments after a trypsin
>> digestion.
>
>You do not say if you reduced and alkylated the protein prior to digestion
>or if you are running reduced SDS gels. If the tryptic digest was done on
>native protein then the disulfide bonds would remain intact during HPLC
>giving rise to fewer and larger peptides than you would see on a reducing
>SDS gel. I would suggest reducton and alkylation prior to digestion or
>following digstion but prior to HPLC depending on what your objective is.
>
>Tim Edmunds
>.
>.
I have done many tryptic digests on peptides. One problem with reducing
and alkylating them first (at least with vinyl pyridine) is that the
trypsin will often cleave at the site of the vinyl-pyridine, giving rise
to way too many fragments that are hard to interpret. We do the digest
first and the alkylation after.
Sue


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Aug 07 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!gondor!newsfeeder.sdsu.edu!news.sgi.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in3.uu.net!EU.net!usenet2.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!uknet!strath-cs!queens-belfast.ac.uk!queens-belfast.ac.uk!nntp
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Recombinant ICE and Apopain/CPP32
Message-ID: <320A05DF.78D2@queens-belfast.ac.uk>
From: Andrew Wallace <a.wallace@queens-belfast.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 1996 16:21:03 +0100
Nntp-Posting-Host: awall.bc.qub.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 12

Does anyone know where I can get some recombinant ICE and apopain/CPP32?
I am in contact with a company called Upstate Biotechnology which sells
His6-tagged apopain but they are out of it at the moment. Are there any
other apoptosis-associated aspases currently available?

Thanks, Andrew

-- 
======================================================================
 Andrew Wallace,Ph.D., Queen's University Belfast,  N. Ireland (UK)   
 a.wallace@qub.ac.uk   http://www.qub.ac.uk/b&bchem/awpage/wallace.htm   
======================================================================

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Aug 07 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!gondor!newsfeeder.sdsu.edu!news.sgi.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in3.uu.net!EU.net!usenet2.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!uknet!strath-cs!queens-belfast.ac.uk!queens-belfast.ac.uk!nntp
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Cathepsin D
Message-ID: <320A055A.4C44@queens-belfast.ac.uk>
From: Andrew Wallace <a.wallace@queens-belfast.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 1996 16:18:50 +0100
References: <wdspiv-2907961828260001@ppp3.dialup.peakaccess.net> <kevin.bailey-050896123116@128.243.183.238>
Nntp-Posting-Host: awall.bc.qub.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 15

According to the Benyon and Bond book on proteolytic enzymes, the 
specificity of Cathepsin D is similar to that of pepsin, i.e.

-P1-P1'- (P1  = non-specific but aromatic and other hydrophobic residues 
preferred, especially Phe, Leu; P1, P1' cannot be Val, Ala, Gly).

Reference: Takayuki, T. and Tang, J. (1980) Methods Enzym. v.80, p.565.

Andrew

-- 
======================================================================
 Andrew Wallace,Ph.D., Queen's University Belfast,  N. Ireland (UK)   
 a.wallace@qub.ac.uk   http://www.qub.ac.uk/b&bchem/awpage/wallace.htm   
======================================================================

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Aug 07 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!newsgate.duke.edu!solaris.cc.vt.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!01-newsfeed.univie.ac.at!03-newsfeed.univie.ac.at!news.univie.ac.at!emb1.bcc.univie.ac.at!rc150295
From: Christian Radauer <rc150295@emb1.bcc.univie.ac.at>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: solubilisation for 2-D gels
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 1996 21:13:43 +0200
Organization: Vienna University, Austria
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960808210112.26859B-100000@emb1.bcc.univie.ac.at>
References: <9607230031.AA21598@maths.marc.cri.nz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: emb1.bcc.univie.ac.at
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <9607230031.AA21598@maths.marc.cri.nz> 

On 22 Jul 1996, Laurence Barker wrote:

> Subject: solubilisation for 2-D gels 
> 
> Hello, 
> I am attempting to run membrane proteins on a 2-D gel, but am 
> experiencing no separation in the IEF first dimension. I have tried using 
> 0.5% Triton X-100 in the solubilisation buffer, and have now been 
> informed that minimal SDS/DTT might help also. Does anyone know about the 
> use of chloryl hydrate to help in solubilisation/inhibition of 
> aggregation, if that is what is happening ?
> Any help glady accepted,
> 
> Laurence Barker.
> 
> The Horticultural and Food Research Institute of New Zealand, 
> Mt Albert Research Centre,
> Auckland, 
> New Zealand
> l.barker@auckland.ac.nz

Hi Laurence,

I have no experience with membrane proteins, but I don't have problems 
separating clear and DNA-free solutions using the following solutions:

Sample solution:
9 M Urea, 4% CHAPS, 0.5% SDS, 2% 2-Mercaptoethanol, 2% Ampholytes

Gel solution:
3.9% Acrylamide, 0.1% PDA, 1.5% CHAPS, 0.5% NP-40, 8.5 M Urea, 2% Ampholytes

The dipolar detergent CHAPS is said to be quite efffective in 
solubilizing proteins, small concentrations of SDS should enhance the 
resolution. The addition of reducing agents (2-ME or DTT) has no 
influence on protein solubilisation but disturbs your pH-Gradient above 
pH 7.5, where the thiol groups dissociate, so use it only if you are not 
intersted in basic proteins.

Hope that helps,

Christian 
 -------------------------------------------------------
Christian Radauer
Institute of General and Experimental Pathology
University of Vienna

AKH 3Q                      Phone: +43 (1) 40400 5116
Waehringer Guertel 18-20      FAX: +43 (1) 40400 5130
A-1090 Wien
Austria

e-mail: rc150295@emb1.bcc.univie.ac.at
-------------------------------------------------------


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Aug 07 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!JASON.UTHCT.EDU!SHAUN
From: SHAUN@JASON.UTHCT.EDU ("Shaun D. Black")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Sequencing Proteins from Westerns of Urea-treated samples
Date: 8 Aug 1996 11:05:52 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 28
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <960808130444.6777@jason.uthct.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hi All,

     Recently, we have had trouble sequencing bands were cut from Western
blots of samples that have been extracted with 3.5 M urea .  We know
that the sequencer is working correctly from known controls run before and
after (at the same pmol level).

     Briefly, samples in 0.1 M Tris pH 7.4 were treated with 3.5 M urea for 
15 min at RT.  Urea is ultrapure molecular-biology grade used without further
purification.  Samples are then centrifuged and supernatant and pellet
fractions are separated.  Fractions are then diluted about 1:1 vol/vol
with SDS-PAGE gel loading buffer and submitted to SDS-PAGE with a Laemmli
system.  Samples were boiled for 2 min before loading.  Then, when gels had
been run, they were soaked briefly in blotting buffer (Towbin with a
smidge of SDS), blotted to PVDF, and then stained with amido black.  Bands 
were excised with a razor blade, and bands were submitted to sequence analysis
with an ABI gas-phase instrument.  No peaks above 1-2 pmol were seen at
any cycle (with multiple bands from the blot).

     Any idea why?  Could small amounts of cyanate from the urea be blocking
our proteins, even in the presence of 0.1 M Tris as a scavenger?  Any ideas
how we can get around this?  Thanks, in advance!  Best regards,  Shaun

  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 
  = Shaun D. Black, PhD   | Internet address:     shaun@jason.uthct.edu = 
  = Dept. of Biochemistry | University of Texas Health Center, at Tyler = 
  = World Wide Web:    http://pegasus.uthct.edu/UTHCT-Home/Welcome.html =
  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 08 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news
From: Pier Carlo Montecucchi <100143.765@CompuServe.COM>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molecules.peptides,sci.bio.technology,sci.chem
Subject: Snail toxins block pain
Date: 9 Aug 1996 10:23:56 GMT
Organization: HI-TECH INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS
Lines: 5
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <4uf3js$6ui$1@mhade.production.compuserve.com>
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.proteins:8469 bionet.molecules.peptides:403 sci.bio.technology:5890 sci.chem:61860

Does some people know something about omega toxin developed at 
Neurex Corp.?
Regards
Pier Carlo Montecucchi
E mail 100143,765@compuserve.com 

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 08 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!unixg.ubc.ca!van-bc!n1van.istar!van.istar!west.istar!ott.istar!istar.net!tor.istar!east.istar!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!cronkite.d48.lilly.com!newsmgr
From: "David B. Flora" <Flora_David_B@lilly.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Sequencing Proteins from Westerns of Urea-treated samples
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 15:44:15 +0000
Organization: Lilly Research Laboratories
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <320B5CCF.2DC5@lilly.com>
References: <960808130444.6777@jason.uthct.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tray.d50.lilly.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Macintosh; I; PPC)

Shaun D. Black wrote:
> 
>      Any idea why?  Could small amounts of cyanate from the urea be blocking
> our proteins, even in the presence of 0.1 M Tris as a scavenger?  Any ideas
> how we can get around this?  Thanks, in advance!  Best regards,  Shaun

Hello,

It sounds like the urea you are using may be blocking your N-termini...you could try 
passing your urea solution over a mixed bed ion-exchange resin such as Amberlite 
Monobed (made by Rohm and Haas).

Dave

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 08 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!usenet
From: Zia <ziadn@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Sequencing of small peptides
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 13:38:15 -0700
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <320BA1B7.3FF@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
Reply-To: ziadn@uclink4.berkeley.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: ziadn.hip.berkeley.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b5aGold (Win16; I)

Hi! In our laboratory we got some custom peptides syntesized by company.
We had asked to bitonylate peptides at NH2 terminal. When peptides came
some peptides related to one virus are labelled Biot-Spacer A.A.-Amino
Acids of our sequence-OH while dor other virus the peptides are labelled 
Biot-Spacer A.A.-Amino Acids of our sequence-NH2. I feel that company
might have done some mistake either in labelling or actually
synthesizing the peptide in reverse sequence. The sequence we supplied
is about 15-20 A.A. long and spacer is about 5-6 A.A. long. I am
interested to sequence these peptides. Can any one tell me how easy/hard
it may be to sequence these peptides? We do not have capability to
sequence the peptides, so is it very expensive to get it sequenced
commercially or can any lab help to sequence those peptides as a help to
me? I do not need to sequence all of them. May be one or two peptides of
each virus should be enough to sequence to figure out whether there is
any mistake in synthesizing the peptides. 

Thanks,

Zia.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 08 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!News1.mcs.net!van-bc!unixg.ubc.ca!lpss
From: lpss@unixg.ubc.ca (Alex Chang)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: BioRad PROTEIN A BINDING BUFFER
Date: 9 Aug 1996 19:01:33 GMT
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <4ug1ud$qra@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: netinfo.ubc.ca
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

I am using BioRad's Protein A column to purify some antibody. They have a
binding buffer (protein A MAPS II Binding Buffer) comes with the column.
I am running out of the buffer now and it is very expensive to buy a new
batch.

Anyone knows the recepe of the buffer please email me.

--
Alex Chang
Pathology
University of British Columbia
achang@hivnet.ubc.ca


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 08 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in3.uu.net!ott.istar!istar.net!tor.istar!east.istar!news.nstn.ca!newsflash.concordia.ca!news.mcgill.ca!VM1.MCGILL.CA
From: Susan James <CYHB000@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Histone 1 Ab
Date: 09 AUG 96 14:34:23 EST
Organization: McGill University
Lines: 24
Sender: usenet@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA
Message-ID: <09AUG96.15739001.0074@VM1.MCGILL.CA>
References: <4ucst3$9bd@sun4.bham.ac.uk> <kevin.bailey-090896133043@128.243.183.238>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vm1.mcgill.ca

In article <kevin.bailey-090896133043@128.243.183.238> kevin.bailey@nottingham.ac.uk () writes:
>In article <4ucst3$9bd@sun4.bham.ac.uk>, T.M.Franklin@bham.ac.uk (Tanya)
>wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Is there anyone out there who has an antibody raised to histone 1, preferably
>> the concerved region. I have a protein which I suspect might be a histone and
>> I need to be able to confirm or disprove the posibility of its being a Histone 1.
>> I have sent the protein for amino acid analysis but would like to be able to
>> provide further prof.
>>
>> Thanks in advance, Tan.
>
>   You could also consider digesting the protein and sequencing a fragment.
>A clear sequence would identify it as histone, though I appreciate there
>are regions common to more than one class of histones.
>.
>.
You might also try to have and mass done of your sample. Either ionspray
or Maldi should give you an exact mass with relatively little material.
Less than 1nmole should be enough.
Susan


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 08 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!warwick!news.nott.ac.uk!NewsWatcher!user
From: kevin.bailey@nottingham.ac.uk ()
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Histone 1 Ab
Followup-To: bionet.molbio.proteins
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 13:30:43 +0100
Organization: Cripps Computing Centre, The University of Nottingham
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <kevin.bailey-090896133043@128.243.183.238>
References: <4ucst3$9bd@sun4.bham.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpbjwk1.biochem.nottingham.ac.uk

In article <4ucst3$9bd@sun4.bham.ac.uk>, T.M.Franklin@bham.ac.uk (Tanya)
wrote:

> Dear All,
> 
> Is there anyone out there who has an antibody raised to histone 1, preferably
> the concerved region. I have a protein which I suspect might be a histone and
> I need to be able to confirm or disprove the posibility of its being a Histone 1.
> I have sent the protein for amino acid analysis but would like to be able to
> provide further prof.
> 
> Thanks in advance, Tan.

			You could also consider digesting the protein and sequencing a fragment.
A clear sequence would identify it as histone, though I appreciate there
are regions common to more than one class of histones.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 08 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in3.uu.net!ott.istar!istar.net!van.istar!west.istar!n1van.istar!van-bc!unixg.ubc.ca!news.bc.net!uvaix3e1.comp.UVic.CA!usenet
From: olafson@uvic.ca (Robert Olafson)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Sequencing Proteins from Westerns of Urea-treated samples
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 23:10:56 GMT
Organization: University of Victoria
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <4ugge1$1g2g@uvaix3e1.comp.UVic.CA>
References: <960808130444.6777@jason.uthct.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: masamune.bioc.uvic.ca
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

SHAUN@JASON.UTHCT.EDU ("Shaun D. Black") wrote:

>Hi All,

>     Recently, we have had trouble sequencing bands were cut from Western
>blots of samples that have been extracted with 3.5 M urea .  We know
>that the sequencer is working correctly from known controls run before and
>after (at the same pmol level).

>     Briefly, samples in 0.1 M Tris pH 7.4 were treated with 3.5 M urea for 
>15 min at RT.  Urea is ultrapure molecular-biology grade used without further
>purification.  Samples are then centrifuged and supernatant and pellet
>fractions are separated.  Fractions are then diluted about 1:1 vol/vol
>with SDS-PAGE gel loading buffer and submitted to SDS-PAGE with a Laemmli
>system.  Samples were boiled for 2 min before loading.  Then, when gels had
>been run, they were soaked briefly in blotting buffer (Towbin with a
>smidge of SDS), blotted to PVDF, and then stained with amido black.  Bands 
>were excised with a razor blade, and bands were submitted to sequence analysis
>with an ABI gas-phase instrument.  No peaks above 1-2 pmol were seen at
>any cycle (with multiple bands from the blot).

>     Any idea why?  Could small amounts of cyanate from the urea be blocking
>our proteins, even in the presence of 0.1 M Tris as a scavenger?  Any ideas
>how we can get around this?  Thanks, in advance!  Best regards,  Shaun

>  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 
>  = Shaun D. Black, PhD   | Internet address:     shaun@jason.uthct.edu = 
>  = Dept. of Biochemistry | University of Texas Health Center, at Tyler = 
>  = World Wide Web:    http://pegasus.uthct.edu/UTHCT-Home/Welcome.html =
>  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Hi Shaun,

Cyanate from urea is notorious for blocking N-terminals in neutral to
basic pH.  The best way I know of to guard against this is to acidify
your urea stock.  In acidic donditions (pH 6.0) the cyanates are
destroyed.  So make sure it is acidified prior to using it.  The
formation of these compounds is time dependant so the shorter your
protein is exposed to urea in a non acidic environment, the better.
Since you are loading the samples onto a gel immediately, I don't
believe you will have a problem.  However, if you still don't get any
sequence, take the PVDF out of the sequencer and subject it to amino
acid analysis.  The binding of stain to protein is always sample
dependant, and you may not have as much material as you think you do.
I should tell you that there is an alternative method for cleaning up
your urea, and that is to store it over few mL of mixed bed ion
exchange resin which will suck up all the "nasties" as my boss likes
to call them.  I think Amberlite resin is the one that has been used
in this lab in the past.  I've never done this, but my supervisor
assures me that it works.  He's from the old school, so the older the
procedure, the better it works.

Good luck,
Dustin Lippert


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 08 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!unixg.ubc.ca!van-bc!n1van.istar!van.istar!west.istar!ott.istar!istar.net!tor.istar!east.istar!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!cronkite.d48.lilly.com!newsmgr
From: "David B. Flora" <Flora_David_B@lilly.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Sequencing Proteins from Westerns of Urea-treated samples
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 15:46:42 +0000
Organization: Lilly Research Laboratories
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <320B5D62.74F8@lilly.com>
References: <960808130444.6777@jason.uthct.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tray.d50.lilly.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Macintosh; I; PPC)

Shaun D. Black wrote:
> 
>      Any idea why?  Could small amounts of cyanate from the urea be blocking
> our proteins, even in the presence of 0.1 M Tris as a scavenger?  Any ideas
> how we can get around this?  Thanks, in advance!  Best regards,  Shaun

Hello,

It sounds like the urea you are using may be blocking your N-termini...you could try 
passing your urea solution over a mixed bed ion-exchange resin such as Amberlite 
Monobed (made by Rohm and Haas).

Dave

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 08 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!EU.net!usenet2.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!uknet!yama.mcc.ac.uk!news.salford.ac.uk!aber!bath.ac.uk!dcl-cs!strath-cs!st-and!gatty!njc
From: Nicholas James Cole <njc@st-andrews.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: phosphorylation
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 1996 17:04:03 +0100
Organization: St. Andrews University
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960809170113.9642B-100000@gatty>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gatty.st-and.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
NNTP-Posting-User: njc
X-Sender: njc@gatty

hello can anyone out there suggest a method to analyse proteins (Muscle) 
in such a way that the same sample is first analysed as normal and then 
analysed fully phosphorylated and then dephosphorylated...using gel 
electrophoresis? many thanks for any advice,

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Aug 08 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!unixg.ubc.ca!news.bc.net!uvaix3e1.comp.UVic.CA!usenet
From: olafson@uvic.ca (Robert Olafson)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Sequencing Proteins from Westerns of Urea-treated samples
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 23:32:42 GMT
Organization: University of Victoria
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <4ughmq$2nb4@uvaix3e1.comp.UVic.CA>
References: <960808130444.6777@jason.uthct.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: masamune.bioc.uvic.ca
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

Our resident protein sequencing expert had some further thoughts on
your situation.  She has apparently never seen a successful sequence
of an amido black stained protein, however, this probably is the
nature of the protein and not the stain.  Part of the problem might be
the staining solution.  I'm not sure what the conditions of staining
are, but if your amido black is in acetic acid, the acid may be
acetylating your N-terminal.  This commonly occurs when people use
standard protocols for Coomassie staining, which are all done in 5-10%
acetic acid.  Most of our samples are stained with Coomassie in 40%
methanol and destained with 50% methanol. You might consider this as
an alternative.  The only other possibility that we can think of is
that your protein is naturally blocked, in which case you're
hooped...hope that's not your problem.

again, good luck
Dustin Lippert




From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Aug 09 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!news.sgi.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in3.uu.net!news00.sunet.se!sunic!news99.sunet.se!news.uni-c.dk!news
From: jmollerup@aki.ku.dk (Jens Mollerup)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: antibody to alkaline phosphatase (E.coli)
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 10:52:29 GMT
Organization: News Server at UNI-C, Danish Computing Centre for Research and Education.
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <4uf4j1$ef8@news.uni-c.dk>
References: <4t49dj$c5h@cc-server9.massey.ac.nz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc152.aki.ku.dk
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

Richard Johnson <R.D.Johnson@Massey.ac.nz> wrote:

>Does anyone know of a good source for anti-alkaline phosphatase antibody?

>thanks

>Richard

DAKO A/S has a rabbit anti-calf alkaline phosphatase antibody (code
no. Z0271), that probably could be delivered to you by MED-BIO 
Enterprises Ltd. in New Zealand

Good Luck

Jens Mollerup
Univ. Copenhagen




From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Aug 09 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!server-b.cs.interbusiness.it!jussieu.fr!univ-lr.fr!usenet
From: jlopes@ketch.univ-lr.fr (Joao Lopes)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Cutinase
Date: 10 Aug 1996 18:01:46 GMT
Organization: Universite de La Rochelle
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <4uiiqa$b1n@hpuniv.univ-lr.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bio.univ-lr.fr
Keywords: Cutinase, Enzyme, Chromatography, Purification


 I'm trying to purify Cutinase by ion exchange chromatography from a mix  
of proteins ( about 50 % cutinase ). Until now, two collums were used (  
cation and anion exchangers ), but in my lab we've optimized a method  
using only a cation exchanger.
 The problem of the purified enzyme Cutinase is that it aggregates and so  
we loose some activity. Methods used for breaking aggregates are well  
knowed but all methods I've try gave week results. Sonication, pH changes,  
additives are an exemple.
 Dilution raises activity but then I have a biggest problem.

 If someone can give an opinion, I'll be grateful.

 joao.lopes@bio.univ-lr.fr


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Aug 09 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!nnrp.info.ucla.edu!unixg.ubc.ca!van-bc!n1van.istar!van.istar!west.istar!ott.istar!istar.net!tor.istar!east.istar!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!news-m01.ny.us.ibm.net!news.biu.ac.il!news.huji.ac.il!avdat3.bgu.ac.il!usenet
From: irisp@bgumail.bgu.ac.il (Iris Porat)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Lolking for PCR program
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 14:45:01 GMT
Organization: Ben Gurion University
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <320c9fcf.697550@news.bgu.ac.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bgumail.bgu.ac.il
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141

I loking for PCR program, for PC, something similar to the program
Amplify that exist for Machintosh.
Thank you,
                                  Iris Porat
Ben Gurion University
Israel

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Aug 09 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!CC.CSIC.ES!ciblr1a
From: ciblr1a@CC.CSIC.ES (Gloria)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Help with dimers
Date: 10 Aug 1996 13:12:15 -0700
Organization: cib
Lines: 637
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <01I84KI1PWSI008CDH@pinarvms.csic.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hello!
We have a little problem with our protein. When we   analyse the cellular extracts by
by Western blotting we detect two bands: one correspondig wito the protein and the other with  
an apparent molecular weight according with a dimer. The problem appears when we try to disgregate
the dimer with DTT 0.1 M, Urea+SDS+heat that it results imposible. Could someone tell us how to 
get it? ormay be everything is an artefact.    
Thanks.
Gloria Gonzale> PROTEIN-ANALYSIS/bionet.molbio.proteins Newsgroup Archive
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please visit our sponsors' WWW pages and tell them you saw their ad
> on BIOSCI.
> 
> [Research Diagnostics, Inc.] [The Nest Group, Inc.]
> 
>   See us for antibodies, antigens... RPC, HILIC, IEX & HIC Chromatography
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Post a new article to PROTEIN-ANALYSIS/bionet.molbio.proteins via
> the BIOSCI mail-Usenet gateway. (Requires that your browser be able
> to handle mailto URLs.)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Read the most recent PROTEIN-ANALYSIS/bionet.molbio.proteins
> articles (Aug 96)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Back to the BIOSCI Home Page
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> The archive is broken down by month (MM) and year (YY)
> The articles are stored in directories named YYMM
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> The archives are indexed using freeWAIS. To search for a keyword or
> phrase occurring in the PROTEIN-ANALYSIS/bionet.molbio.proteins
> newsgroup, enter your query below. freeWAIS supports the Boolean
> operators "and" and "not" and the truncation operator *. If multiple
> search terms are entered without boolean operators, messages
> containing any one or more of the terms are returned, i.e., an "or"
> search is the default. For example
> 
> PCR and sequenc* not DNA
> 
> will find messages that contain the text "PCR" and any words
> starting with "sequenc" (sequence, sequencing, etc.) but exclude
> messages containing the text "DNA." Terms do not occur in any
> specific order in the message.
> 
> Search for:
> 
> Maximum hits returned:
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> [     ] Name                   Last modified     Size  Description
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  [DIR]   Parent Directory       10-Aug-96 12:08      -
> 
>  [DIR]   8912/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9001/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9002/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9003/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9004/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9005/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9006/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9007/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9008/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9009/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9010/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9011/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9012/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9101/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9102/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9103/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9104/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9105/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9106/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9107/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9108/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9109/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9110/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9111/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9112/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9201/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9202/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9203/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9204/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9205/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9206/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9207/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9208/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9209/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9210/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9211/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9212/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9301/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9302/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9303/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9304/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9305/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9306/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9307/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9308/                  13-Nov-95 01:45      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9309/                  13-Nov-95 01:45      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9310/                  13-Nov-95 01:45      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9311/                  13-Nov-95 01:45      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9312/                  13-Nov-95 01:46      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9403/                  13-Nov-95 01:46      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9404/                  13-Nov-95 01:47      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9405/                  13-Nov-95 01:47      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9406/                  13-Nov-95 01:47      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9407/                  13-Nov-95 01:48      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9408/                  13-Nov-95 01:48      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9409/                  13-Nov-95 01:49      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9410/                  13-Nov-95 01:49      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9411/                  13-Nov-95 01:49      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9412/                  13-Nov-95 01:50      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9501/                  13-Nov-95 01:50      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9502/                  13-Nov-95 01:51      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9503/                  13-Nov-95 01:51      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9504/                  13-Nov-95 01:52      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9505/                  13-Nov-95 01:53      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9506/                  13-Nov-95 01:53      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9507/                  13-Nov-95 01:54      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9508/                  13-Nov-95 01:54      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9509/                  13-Nov-95 01:55      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9510/                  13-Nov-95 01:56      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9511/                  27-Dec-95 19:27      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9512/                  31-Dec-95 18:25      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9601/                  31-Jan-96 15:49      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9602/                  29-Feb-96 21:40      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9603/                  31-Mar-96 19:13      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9604/                  30-Apr-96 23:01      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9605/                  31-May-96 21:26      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9606/                  30-Jun-96 19:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9607/                  31-Jul-96 18:57      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9608/                  10-Aug-96 11:26      -
> PROTEIN-ANALYSIS/bionet.molbio.proteins Newsgroup Archive
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please visit our sponsors' WWW pages and tell them you saw their ad
> on BIOSCI.
> 
> [Research Diagnostics, Inc.] [The Nest Group, Inc.]
> 
>   See us for antibodies, antigens... RPC, HILIC, IEX & HIC Chromatography
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Post a new article to PROTEIN-ANALYSIS/bionet.molbio.proteins via
> the BIOSCI mail-Usenet gateway. (Requires that your browser be able
> to handle mailto URLs.)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Read the most recent PROTEIN-ANALYSIS/bionet.molbio.proteins
> articles (Aug 96)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Back to the BIOSCI Home Page
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> The archive is broken down by month (MM) and year (YY)
> The articles are stored in directories named YYMM
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> The archives are indexed using freeWAIS. To search for a keyword or
> phrase occurring in the PROTEIN-ANALYSIS/bionet.molbio.proteins
> newsgroup, enter your query below. freeWAIS supports the Boolean
> operators "and" and "not" and the truncation operator *. If multiple
> search terms are entered without boolean operators, messages
> containing any one or more of the terms are returned, i.e., an "or"
> search is the default. For example
> 
> PCR and sequenc* not DNA
> 
> will find messages that contain the text "PCR" and any words
> starting with "sequenc" (sequence, sequencing, etc.) but exclude
> messages containing the text "DNA." Terms do not occur in any
> specific order in the message.
> 
> Search for:
> 
> Maximum hits returned:
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> [     ] Name                   Last modified     Size  Description
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  [DIR]   Parent Directory       10-Aug-96 12:08      -
> 
>  [DIR]   8912/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9001/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9002/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9003/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9004/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9005/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9006/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9007/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9008/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9009/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9010/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9011/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9012/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9101/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9102/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9103/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9104/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9105/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9106/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9107/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9108/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9109/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9110/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9111/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9112/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9201/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9202/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9203/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9204/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9205/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9206/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9207/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9208/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9209/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9210/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9211/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9212/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9301/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9302/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9303/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9304/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9305/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9306/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9307/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9308/                  13-Nov-95 01:45      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9309/                  13-Nov-95 01:45      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9310/                  13-Nov-95 01:45      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9311/                  13-Nov-95 01:45      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9312/                  13-Nov-95 01:46      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9403/                  13-Nov-95 01:46      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9404/                  13-Nov-95 01:47      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9405/                  13-Nov-95 01:47      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9406/                  13-Nov-95 01:47      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9407/                  13-Nov-95 01:48      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9408/                  13-Nov-95 01:48      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9409/                  13-Nov-95 01:49      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9410/                  13-Nov-95 01:49      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9411/                  13-Nov-95 01:49      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9412/                  13-Nov-95 01:50      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9501/                  13-Nov-95 01:50      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9502/                  13-Nov-95 01:51      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9503/                  13-Nov-95 01:51      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9504/                  13-Nov-95 01:52      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9505/                  13-Nov-95 01:53      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9506/                  13-Nov-95 01:53      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9507/                  13-Nov-95 01:54      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9508/                  13-Nov-95 01:54      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9509/                  13-Nov-95 01:55      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9510/                  13-Nov-95 01:56      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9511/                  27-Dec-95 19:27      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9512/                  31-Dec-95 18:25      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9601/                  31-Jan-96 15:49      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9602/                  29-Feb-96 21:40      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9603/                  31-Mar-96 19:13      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9604/                  30-Apr-96 23:01      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9605/                  31-May-96 21:26      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9606/                  30-Jun-96 19:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9607/                  31-Jul-96 18:57      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9608/                  10-Aug-96 11:26      -
> PROTEIN-ANALYSIS/bionet.molbio.proteins Newsgroup Archive
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please visit our sponsors' WWW pages and tell them you saw their ad
> on BIOSCI.
> 
> [Research Diagnostics, Inc.] [The Nest Group, Inc.]
> 
>   See us for antibodies, antigens... RPC, HILIC, IEX & HIC Chromatography
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Post a new article to PROTEIN-ANALYSIS/bionet.molbio.proteins via
> the BIOSCI mail-Usenet gateway. (Requires that your browser be able
> to handle mailto URLs.)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Read the most recent PROTEIN-ANALYSIS/bionet.molbio.proteins
> articles (Aug 96)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Back to the BIOSCI Home Page
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> The archive is broken down by month (MM) and year (YY)
> The articles are stored in directories named YYMM
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> The archives are indexed using freeWAIS. To search for a keyword or
> phrase occurring in the PROTEIN-ANALYSIS/bionet.molbio.proteins
> newsgroup, enter your query below. freeWAIS supports the Boolean
> operators "and" and "not" and the truncation operator *. If multiple
> search terms are entered without boolean operators, messages
> containing any one or more of the terms are returned, i.e., an "or"
> search is the default. For example
> 
> PCR and sequenc* not DNA
> 
> will find messages that contain the text "PCR" and any words
> starting with "sequenc" (sequence, sequencing, etc.) but exclude
> messages containing the text "DNA." Terms do not occur in any
> specific order in the message.
> 
> Search for:
> 
> Maximum hits returned:
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> [     ] Name                   Last modified     Size  Description
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  [DIR]   Parent Directory       10-Aug-96 12:08      -
> 
>  [DIR]   8912/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9001/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9002/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9003/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9004/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9005/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9006/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9007/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9008/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9009/                  13-Nov-95 01:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9010/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9011/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9012/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9101/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9102/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9103/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9104/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9105/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9106/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9107/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9108/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9109/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9110/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9111/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9112/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9201/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9202/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9203/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9204/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9205/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9206/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9207/                  13-Nov-95 01:43      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9208/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9209/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9210/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9211/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9212/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9301/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9302/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9303/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9304/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9305/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9306/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9307/                  13-Nov-95 01:44      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9308/                  13-Nov-95 01:45      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9309/                  13-Nov-95 01:45      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9310/                  13-Nov-95 01:45      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9311/                  13-Nov-95 01:45      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9312/                  13-Nov-95 01:46      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9403/                  13-Nov-95 01:46      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9404/                  13-Nov-95 01:47      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9405/                  13-Nov-95 01:47      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9406/                  13-Nov-95 01:47      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9407/                  13-Nov-95 01:48      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9408/                  13-Nov-95 01:48      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9409/                  13-Nov-95 01:49      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9410/                  13-Nov-95 01:49      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9411/                  13-Nov-95 01:49      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9412/                  13-Nov-95 01:50      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9501/                  13-Nov-95 01:50      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9502/                  13-Nov-95 01:51      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9503/                  13-Nov-95 01:51      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9504/                  13-Nov-95 01:52      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9505/                  13-Nov-95 01:53      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9506/                  13-Nov-95 01:53      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9507/                  13-Nov-95 01:54      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9508/                  13-Nov-95 01:54      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9509/                  13-Nov-95 01:55      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9510/                  13-Nov-95 01:56      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9511/                  27-Dec-95 19:27      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9512/                  31-Dec-95 18:25      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9601/                  31-Jan-96 15:49      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9602/                  29-Feb-96 21:40      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9603/                  31-Mar-96 19:13      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9604/                  30-Apr-96 23:01      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9605/                  31-May-96 21:26      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9606/                  30-Jun-96 19:42      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9607/                  31-Jul-96 18:57      -
> 
>  [DIR]   9608/                  10-Aug-96 11:26      -
z  



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Aug 09 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!news.sgi.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!nnrp.info.ucla.edu!wlheye.jsei.ucla.edu!hassane
From: hassane@wlheye.jsei.ucla.edu (hassane mchaourab)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Beckman HPLC:system gold nouveau
Date: 10 Aug 1996 21:34:09 GMT
Organization: Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <4uiv8h$19a8@uni.library.ucla.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wlheye.jsei.ucla.edu

Hi,

 I am setting up a new lab. I am considering for HPLC the beckman 
system gold noveau(Plastic Pumps). Since I have never used this
equipment and could not find many users in my department I am looking
for advice.
Thanks

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sat Aug 10 23:00:00 1996
Message-ID: <320EC071.1E80@oa.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:26:09 -0500
From: Charles <cewhiteh@oa.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: bionet.cellbiol,bionet.immunology,bionet.general,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Eukaryotic Promoter Database
References: <bilha001-1108961531020001@dialup-4-6.gw.umn.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: cewhiteh.virtual.oa.net
Lines: 4
Path: biosci!rutgers!gatech!arclight.uoregon.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-stk-200.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-pen-14.sprintlink.net!newshost.oa.net!
Xref: biosci bionet.cellbiol:5245 bionet.immunology:9521 bionet.general:22945 bionet.molbio.proteins:8485

Dear Brent:

The Signal Scan data base can be used over the Web:

http://bimas.dcrt.nih.gov/molbio/signal/

Good Luck......

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 11 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!gatech!news.jsums.edu!news.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.orst.edu!newshub.tc.umn.edu!newsstand.tc.umn.edu!dialup-4-6.gw.umn.edu!user
From: bilha001@gold.tc.umn.edu (Brent)
Newsgroups: bionet.cellbiol,bionet.immunology,bionet.general,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Eukaryotic Promoter Database
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 1996 15:31:02 -0600
Organization: J&B INC.
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <bilha001-1108961531020001@dialup-4-6.gw.umn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-4-6.gw.umn.edu
Xref: biosci bionet.cellbiol:5246 bionet.immunology:9522 bionet.general:22946 bionet.molbio.proteins:8486


   I have heard of a searchable database that will allow me to search
promoters for potential target genes based on the consensus binding site
of a DNA binding protein. Can somebody direct me to this database?

                           Thanks,
                           BRENT

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 11 23:00:00 1996
Message-ID: <320EC272.599D@oa.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:34:42 -0500
From: Charles <cewhiteh@oa.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: bionet.cellbiol,bionet.immunology,bionet.general,bionet.molbio.proteins
To: Brent <bilha001@gold.tc.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: Eukaryotic Promoter Database
References: <bilha001-1108961531020001@dialup-4-6.gw.umn.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: cewhiteh.virtual.oa.net
Lines: 4
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!news.sprintlink.net!news-stk-200.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-pen-14.sprintlink.net!newshost.oa.net!
Xref: biosci bionet.cellbiol:5247 bionet.immunology:9524 bionet.general:22947 bionet.molbio.proteins:8488

Brent:

You can use the Signal Scan Program at this Web site:

http://bimas.dcrt.nih.gov/molbio/signal/

Good Luck......

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 11 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!news.sgi.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!newstand.syr.edu!usenet
From: dslomczy@mailbox.syr.edu
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Beckman HPLC:system gold nouveau
Date: 11 Aug 1996 19:11:36 GMT
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY (USA)
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <4ulb98$449@newstand.syr.edu>
References: <4uiv8h$19a8@uni.library.ucla.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sudial-69.syr.edu
X-Newsreader: News for Windows NT X1.0-74

 >I am setting up a new lab. I am considering for HPLC the beckman 
>system gold noveau(Plastic Pumps). Since I have never used this
>equipment and could not find many users in my department I am looking
>for advice.
>Thanks
What are going to use the equipment for?  Will it be for Protein purification 
or analytical methods.  First ask this question then look for the equipment 
which is best suited for your needs.  There are many excellent manufacturers
of HPLC equipment (HP, Waters, LKB-Pharmacia, Isco, and others).  Look at 
all the equipment and then decide - it can be an expensive mistake.

I hope this helps

                                                  David Slomczynski
                                             dslomczy@mailbox.syr.edu 


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 11 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!surfnet.nl!news.wau.nl!usenet
From: William Kloek <William.Kloek@algemeen.glf.wau.nl>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Program for schematic representation proteins
Date: 12 Aug 1996 09:10:40 GMT
Organization: Wageningen Agricultural University
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <4umseg$or4@Trex.IenD.wau.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: flex060.biot.wau.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)

HI,

I am looking for a program that can make from an aminoacid sequence of a 
protein that characterizes the protein with a straight line. On 
this line information should be given by means of markers concerning 
hydrophobic residues, Pro residues and possibilities for S-S bridges.It 
should also be possible to indicate the charge by a vertical line up -or 
down, depending on the charge being positive or negative and the length 
should indicate the magnitude of the charge.
Does anybody know if such a program is available in the public domain. 
Please also E-mail,

Thanks


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 11 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!warwick!bham!usenet
From: altabios@bham.ac.uk (John E. Fox)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Sequencing of small peptides
Date: 12 Aug 1996 12:39:59 GMT
Organization: Alta Bioscience
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <4un8mv$grl@sun4.bham.ac.uk>
References: <320BA1B7.3FF@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcs118.bham.ac.uk
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.90.6

In article <320BA1B7.3FF@uclink4.berkeley.edu>, Zia <ziadn@uclink4.berkeley.edu> says:
>
>Hi! In our laboratory we got some custom peptides syntesized by company.
>We had asked to bitonylate peptides at NH2 terminal. When peptides came
>some peptides related to one virus are labelled Biot-Spacer A.A.-Amino
>Acids of our sequence-OH while dor other virus the peptides are labelled 

Dear Zia,
Looks to me as though some of the peptides have free acid groups
at the C-terminal and written as sequence - OH
The others labelled - NH2  will have amide C-terminal.

By any chance do the NH2 peptides have proline as their C-amino acid?
That would explain the choice of amide.

John Fox

******************************************************************
Alta BioScience                         Email: altabios@bham.ac.uk
School of Biochemistry                  Phone: 0121-414-5450
The University of Birmingham            Fax:   0121-414-3376
Edgbaston, BIRMINGHAM, B15 2TT, UK

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 11 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!GUITAR.ROCKEFELLER.EDU!ilya
From: ilya@GUITAR.ROCKEFELLER.EDU (Ilya Vakser)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Announcement - protein docking program GRAMM
Date: 12 Aug 1996 15:30:16 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 92
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <320FB1B6.167E@guitar.rockefeller.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

-----------
GRAMM v1.03
-----------

This note is to announce the availability of GRAMM (Global RAnge 
Molecular Matching) software. GRAMM is a program for protein docking. To 
predict the structure of a complex, it requires only the atomic 
coordinates of the two molecules (no information about the binding sites 
is needed). The program performs an exhaustive 6-dimensional search 
through the relative translations and rotations of the molecules. The 
molecular pairs may be: two proteins, a protein and a smaller compound, 
two transmembrane (TM) helices, etc. GRAMM may be used for high-
resolution molecules, for inaccurate structures (where only the gross 
structural features are known), in cases of large conformational 
changes, etc.

The Global Range Molecular Matching (GRAMM) methodology is an empirical 
approach to smoothing the intermolecular energy function by changing the 
range of the atom-atom potentials. The technique allows to locate the 
area of the global minimum of intermolecular energy for structures of 
different accuracy. The quality of the prediction depends on the 
accuracy of the structures. Thus, the docking of high-resolution 
structures with small conformational changes yields an accurate 
prediction, while the docking of ultralow-resolution structures will 
give only the gross features of the complex.

_________________

I am making GRAMM publicly available following a number of requests from 
different labs. I would like to make it clear, however, that both the 
methodology and the program, at present, are in the process of active 
development and validation, especially in the area of the low-resolution 
docking, and have to be viewed like that. The program is free. However, 
I would expect proper references. I will also appreciate bug reports. To 
get GRAMM, send the request to ilya@guitar.rockefeller.edu. The GRAMM 
site on the Web is http://guitar.rockefeller.edu/. 

GRAMM was created during my stay in the Weizmann Institute (1991-1993), 
in the Washington University (1993-1995), and in the Rockefeller 
University (1995-1996). I deeply appreciate the assistance of my 
colleagues in all these institutions (especially, Profs. Ephraim 
Katchalski-Katzir, Garland Marshall, and Andrej Sali).

Platforms

Presently, GRAMM is compiled on SGI R4000, SGI R4400, SGI R8000, and SGI 
R10000 Unix workstations. In the near future I will expand this list, so 
check the GRAMM site for the updates. Interestingly, GRAMM also works on 
a PC platform under Windows95 (the performance on P5-120 with 16 MB RAM 
is only two times slower than on SGI 250 MHZ Indigo2 R4400).

Papers on GRAMM methodology

* E. Katchalski-Katzir, I. Shariv, M. Eisenstein, A. A. Friesem, C.
  Aflalo, I. A. Vakser, 1992, Molecular surface recognition:
  Determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by
  correlation techniques, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 2195-2199.
  (Basic algorithm of protein recognition by correlation technique with
  Fast Fourier transform. High-resolution 'geometric' docking).

* I. A. Vakser, C. Aflalo, 1994, Hydrophobic docking: A proposed
  enhancement to molecular recognition techniques, Proteins, 20,
  320-329. (High-resolution 'hydrophobic' docking).

* I. A. Vakser, G. V. Nikiforovich, 1995a, Protein docking in the
  absence of detailed molecular structures, in: Methods in Protein
  Structure Analysis (M. Z. Atassi & E. Appella, eds.), Plenum Press,
  New York, pp. 505-514.

* I. A. Vakser, 1995b, Protein docking for low-resolution structures,
  Protein Eng., 8, 371- 377. ('Low-resolution' protein docking).

* I. A. Vakser, 1996a, Long-distance potentials: An approach to the
  multiple-minima problem in ligand-receptor interaction, Protein Eng.,
  9, 37-41. (Interpretation of the low-resolution docking in terms of
  energy potentials).

* I. A. Vakser, 1996b, Low-resolution docking: Prediction of complexes
  for underdetermined structures, Biopolymers, in press (39, No.3).
  (Validation of the low-resolution docking).

* I. A. Vakser, 1996c, Main-chain complementarity in protein-protein
  recognition, Protein Eng., in press (9, No.7). (Docking of Ca
  structures).

------------------------------------------------------------------
Ilya A. Vakser
The Rockefeller University, Box 270
1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021
Phone: (212) 327-7206; Fax: (212) 327-7540
Email: ilya@guitar.rockefeller.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 11 23:00:00 1996
Message-ID: <320EC2A4.4AE3@oa.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:35:32 -0500
From: Charles <cewhiteh@oa.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: bionet.cellbiol,bionet.immunology,bionet.general,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Eukaryotic Promoter Database
References: <bilha001-1108961531020001@dialup-4-6.gw.umn.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: cewhiteh.virtual.oa.net
Lines: 8
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!news.sprintlink.net!news-stk-200.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-pen-14.sprintlink.net!newshost.oa.net!
Xref: biosci bionet.cellbiol:5248 bionet.immunology:9525 bionet.general:22948 bionet.molbio.proteins:8489

Brent wrote:
> 
>    I have heard of a searchable database that will allow me to search
> promoters for potential target genes based on the consensus binding site
> of a DNA binding protein. Can somebody direct me to this database?
> 
>                            Thanks,
>                            BRENT

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 11 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!EU.net!usenet2.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!uknet!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!daresbury!bioftp.unibas.ch!news.vub.ac.be!news.belnet.be!swsbe6.switch.ch!scsing.switch.ch!rzunews.unizh.ch!NewsWatcher!user
From: maga@vetbio.unizh.ch (Giovanni Maga)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: phosphorylation
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 17:37:43 +0200
Organization: University of Zurich Irchel- Biochemistry
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <maga-1208961737430001@130.60.120.18>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960809170113.9642B-100000@gatty>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.60.120.18

In article <Pine.SUN.3.91.960809170113.9642B-100000@gatty>, Nicholas James
Cole <njc@st-andrews.ac.uk> wrote:

> hello can anyone out there suggest a method to analyse proteins (Muscle) 
> in such a way that the same sample is first analysed as normal and then 
> analysed fully phosphorylated and then dephosphorylated...using gel 
> electrophoresis? many thanks for any advice,

Know it sounds obvious but...what about start with a certain amount (i.e.
1 ug) of your protein in 70 ul (just to say), take out 20 ul and load the
gel (unmodified sample), add the kinase, make the reaction take out 20 ul,
load (phosphorylated sample), add the phosphatase, make the reaction, take
20 ul and load (dephosphorylated sample). This if you worry about the
reproducibility. If you do not, the easiest thing is to set up four
parallel reactions (unmodified sample incubated alone and plus phosphatase
as negative controls; sample incubated with the kinase, sample incubated
with kinase and then with phosphatase).
Don't know...doesn't it sound good enough to you?
Giovanni.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 11 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!nntp.coast.net!news.dacom.co.kr!usenet.seri.re.kr!news.postech.ac.kr!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!agate!newsgate.duke.edu!godot.cc.duq.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!EU.net!main.Germany.EU.net!fu-berlin.de!news.th-darmstadt.de!tutor.oc.chemie.th-darmstadt.de!martin
From: martin@tutor.oc.chemie.th-darmstadt.de (Martin Kroeker)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: inhibitor modelling based on 3D structures
Date: 12 Aug 1996 15:53:53 GMT
Organization: Technische Hochschule Darmstadt
Lines: 18
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4unk2h$ods@rs18.hrz.th-darmstadt.de>
References: <320F4683.F84@pclsp2.kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tutor.oc.chemie.th-darmstadt.de
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

mihara (mihara@PCLSP2.KUICR.KYOTO-U.AC.JP) wrote:
: Dear Sir,
: We are looking for an inhibitor for L-haloacid dehalogenase, i.e., compound(s) 
: structurally similar to L-2-chloropropionic acid. We heard that through Cambridge 
: Structural Database(CSD), a lot of compounds understood by X-ray analysis might have 
: such information but we can not get access to this database. Could you tell us how to 
: access to CSD or introduce to us candidate compounds? Thank you in advance. 
: Li and Nishihara
The CSD is distributed as a single CD-ROM containing crystallographic data
of approx. 140000 compounds. Please check out http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk for 
more details and postal addresses of their regional contacts. 
Hope this helps,
Martin
--
Dr.-Ing. Martin Kroeker                 
Inst. f. Organ. Chemie                   martin@oc2.oc.chemie.th-darmstadt.de
Univ. (TH) Darmstadt                           db7p@hrzpub.th-darmstadt.de
Germany                                     

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 11 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!agate!newsgate.duke.edu!news-server.ncren.net!concert!newz.oit.unc.edu!usenet
From: "Helen R. Mott" <hrm@med.unc.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: GMPPCP
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 11:41:39 -0400
Organization: University of North Carolina
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <320F50B3.41C6@med.unc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: indy2.med.unc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP22)

Does anyone happen to know of a supplier of the non-hydrolysable GTP analog
GMPPCP within the USA? We used to get supplies from Boehringer, Fluka or
Calbiochem but they all seem to have stopped making it!

Thanks in advance

Helen Mott

        -----------------------------------------------------------------
        Dr Helen R. Mott        Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
        hrm@med.unc.edu         University of North Carolina, CB #7260
                                Chapel Hill, NC 27599
        Fax(919) 966 2852       Ph:(919) 966 6781
        -----------------------------------------------------------------

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 11 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!PCLSP2.KUICR.KYOTO-U.AC.JP!mihara
From: mihara@PCLSP2.KUICR.KYOTO-U.AC.JP (mihara)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: inhibitor modelling based on 3D structures
Date: 12 Aug 1996 06:54:50 -0700
Organization: Institute for Chemical Research ,Kyoto University
Lines: 7
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <320F4683.F84@pclsp2.kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Reply-To: mihara@pclsp2.kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Dear Sir,
We are looking for an inhibitor for L-haloacid dehalogenase, i.e., compound(s) 
structurally similar to L-2-chloropropionic acid. We heard that through Cambridge 
Structural Database(CSD), a lot of compounds understood by X-ray analysis might have 
such information but we can not get access to this database. Could you tell us how to 
access to CSD or introduce to us candidate compounds? Thank you in advance. 
Li and Nishihara

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Aug 11 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!solace!eru.mt.luth.se!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.mathworks.com!enews.sgi.com!news.sgi.com!cgl!picasso.ucsf.edu!smiller
From: smiller@picasso.ucsf.edu (Stephen Miller)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molecules.peptides,sci.bio.technology,sci.chem
Subject: Re: Snail toxins block pain
Date: 12 Aug 96 20:20:20 GMT
Organization: UCSF Computer Graphics Lab
Lines: 14
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <smiller.839881220@picasso.ucsf.edu>
References: <4uf3js$6ui$1@mhade.production.compuserve.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: picasso-yp.ucsf.edu
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.proteins:8496 bionet.molecules.peptides:405 sci.bio.technology:5911 sci.chem:61984

Pier Carlo Montecucchi <100143.765@CompuServe.COM> writes:

>Does some people know something about omega toxin developed at 
>Neurex Corp.?

Look up papers by Baldomero Olivera in Medline or CC. Neurex also publishes
some papers, usually including J. Ramachandran among the authors. There's
another competing group in Tokyo at the Mitsubishi Institute of (something).
The omega-conotoxins are neuronal calcium-channel blockers, and are all
rigid peptides with THREE disulfide bonds. Impressive conformational
restriction!

Steve.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Aug 12 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!csn!nntp-xfer-1.csn.net!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.erols.net!agate!spool.mu.edu!munnari.OZ.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!murphy
From: rm@clyde.its.unimelb.edu.au (Roger  )
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molecules.peptides,sci.bio.technology,sci.chem
Subject: Re: Snail toxins block pain
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 96 03:47:51 GMT
Organization: University of Melbourne
Lines: 23
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <4urloq$5at@news.unimelb.EDU.AU>
References: <4uf3js$6ui$1@mhade.production.compuserve.com> <smiller.839881220@picasso.ucsf.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: murphy.pharmacology.unimelb.edu.au
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.0 Beta #0
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.proteins:8504 bionet.molecules.peptides:407 sci.bio.technology:5920 sci.chem:62010

In article <smiller.839881220@picasso.ucsf.edu>, smiller@picasso.ucsf.edu (Stephen Miller) wrote:
>Pier Carlo Montecucchi <100143.765@CompuServe.COM> writes:
>
>>Does some people know something about omega toxin developed at 
>>Neurex Corp.?
>
>Look up papers by Baldomero Olivera in Medline or CC. Neurex also publishes
>some papers, usually including J. Ramachandran among the authors. There's
>another competing group in Tokyo at the Mitsubishi Institute of (something).
>The omega-conotoxins are neuronal calcium-channel blockers, and are all
>rigid peptides with THREE disulfide bonds. Impressive conformational
>restriction!
>
>Steve.
>

Neurex have apparently used omega-conotoxin MVIIA injected intrathecally for 
chronic pain relief.  Otherwise, I agree with Steve - look up either Olivera's 
papers or K. Sato's papers.

Cheers,

Roger Murphy

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Aug 12 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!csn!nntp-xfer-1.csn.net!carbon!night.primate.wisc.edu!ames!enews.sgi.com!news.sgi.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!purdue!mozo.cc.purdue.edu!news
From: Vadim Beilinson <vbeilinson@dept.agry.purdue.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: info on polyclonal antibodies against soybean BBI needed
Date: 13 Aug 1996 18:48:18 GMT
Organization: Purdue University
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <4uqili$qui@mozo.cc.purdue.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: soypr2.agry.purdue.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit)

Dear Researcher,
would you please provide me with information on a source for polyclonal antibodies 
against soybean Bowman-Birk inhibitor (BBI). Thank you very much for your time.
Vadim.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Aug 12 23:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!news.sgi.com!swrinde!howland.erols.net!agate!newsgate.duke.edu!godot.cc.duq.edu!usenet
From: "Frank R. Gorga" <gorga@next.duq.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Specificity of NEM toward cysteine residues
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 13:43:24 -0700
Organization: Duquesne University
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <3210E8EC.6EE0@next.duq.edu>
References: <dodel-1308961626090001@chokotoff.biocell.fundp.ac.be>
NNTP-Posting-Host: phosphorus.chemistry.duq.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I)

Dominique DELFORGE wrote:
> <snip>
 
> My questions are: Does someone know something about the c