From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Nov 01 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!mr.net!newshub.tc.umn.edu!fu-berlin.de!informatik.tu-muenchen.de!lrz-muenchen.de!uni-erlangen.de!winx03!wpxx02!not-for-mail
From: krasel@wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de (Cornelius Krasel)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Protein Data Bank Resources!
Date: 2 Nov 1996 18:07:02 GMT
Organization: University of Wuerzburg, Germany
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <55g2k6$2m@winx03.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
References: <55fsv5$rvr@hptemp1.cc.umr.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]

Raghavender Pillutla (raghav@saucer.cc.umr.edu) wrote:
> I find it very difficult to get information from the protein data bank of 
> brookhaven national laboratory. I find the database organisation very 
> complex and cannot get what I want. I would like to know if any resources 
> such as books, or CD-roms are available which tell me how to access 
> information from Protein Data Bank. If these are available, I would 
> appreciate if someone told me where I can find them also.

You should use a WWW gateway. There are several:

- the one at the PDB itself which you apparently don't like:
  http://www.pdb.bnl.gov/cgi-bin/browse
- full-text search at the NIH:
  http://molbio.info.nih.gov/cgi-bin/pdb
- Moose:
  http://db2.sdsc.edu/moose/

--Cornelius.

-- 
/* Cornelius Krasel, U Wuerzburg, Dept. of Pharmacology, Versbacher Str. 9 */
/* D-97078 Wuerzburg, Germany   email: phak004@rzbox.uni-wuerzburg.de  SP3 */
/* "Science is the game we play with God to find out what His rules are."  */

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Nov 01 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!mr.net!news.mid.net!nntp.ksu.edu!hptemp1.cc.umr.edu!raghav
From: raghav@saucer.cc.umr.edu (Raghavender Pillutla)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Protein Data Bank Resources!
Date: 2 Nov 1996 16:30:29 GMT
Organization: UMR Missouri's Technological University
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <55fsv5$rvr@hptemp1.cc.umr.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: saucer.cc.umr.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Hello netters,

I find it very difficult to get information from the protein data bank of 
brookhaven national laboratory. I find the database organisation very 
complex and cannot get what I want. I would like to know if any resources 
such as books, or CD-roms are available which tell me how to access 
information from Protein Data Bank. If these are available, I would 
appreciate if someone told me where I can find them also.


Thanks a lot,
Raghu

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Nov 01 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!feed1.news.erols.com!arclight.uoregon.edu!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!peacocks.demon.co.uk!user
From: bill@peacocks.demon.co.uk (William Peacock)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Diff. between intrinsic/extrinsic cell membrane proteins
Followup-To: bill@peacocks.demon.co.uk
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 1996 20:41:40 +0100
Lines: 9
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <bill-0211962041410001@peacocks.demon.co.uk>
Reply-To: bill@peacocks.demon.co.uk
NNTP-Posting-Host: peacocks.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: peacocks.demon.co.uk

PLease could someone tell me whether proteins found within cell membranes
which penetrate the membrane but do not span the entire membrane are
classed as intrinsic or extrinsic proteins; reference book s seem split
over this.

Thanks,
William Peacock

            

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Nov 01 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!news.sgi.com!mr.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!feed1.news.erols.com!news.enteract.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: "The Kindly One" <don't@worry.about.it>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Reprobing western blots
Date: 3 Nov 1996 04:39:27 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <01bbc941$1f8e5760$4ef61fcc@natasha>
References: <327545E7.6162@lucano.uco.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lex-ky2-14.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Nov 02  8:39:27 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1155

Biol. Cel. <bc2biced@lucano.uco.es> wrote in article
<327545E7.6162@lucano.uco.es>...
> I need to reprobe western blots with a primary antibody after
> detect with ECL a firs immunodetection. How can I separate the first
> antibody and reprobe the blot?
> 
> 	Thank you in advance.
> 
Read the protocol given by ECL!!!  It works great for us. I think it
involves using 2X tris and 
incubating for an hour or so at 50(or 60) degrees. That should take off the
primary Ab and then
you can reprobe. It's all in the ECL booklet.



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Nov 01 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!uwm.edu!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!news.doit.wisc.edu!daemon
From: klenchin@facstaff.wisc.edu (Dima Klenchin)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Diff. between intrinsic/extrinsic cell membrane proteins
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 96 01:41:13 GMT
Organization: UW-Madison
Lines: 13
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <55gppg$1dfu@news.doit.wisc.edu>
References: <bill-0211962041410001@peacocks.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: f181-194.net.wisc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-No-Archive: Yes

In article <bill-0211962041410001@peacocks.demon.co.uk>, bill@peacocks.demon.co.uk wrote:
#PLease could someone tell me whether proteins found within cell membranes
#which penetrate the membrane but do not span the entire membrane are
#classed as intrinsic or extrinsic proteins; reference book s seem split
#over this.

This is just a matter of definition not worth to think about. 
IMO, it's better to use "functional" definition, one possible 
example of which is extraction with ~ 6 M urea. 
"True" membrane proteins (embedded in the membrane) cannot
be extracted since urea does not dissolve membrane bilyaer. 

- Dima

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sat Nov 02 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!news.sgi.com!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!sdd.hp.com!night.primate.wisc.edu!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!news.doit.wisc.edu!daemon
From: klenchin@facstaff.wisc.edu (Dima Klenchin)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Q:stability of immobilized enzyme
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 96 05:18:18 GMT
Organization: UW-Madison
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <55jqsh$k20@news.doit.wisc.edu>
References: <55iiif$65e@rks1.urz.tu-dresden.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: f181-190.net.wisc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-No-Archive: Yes

In article <55iiif$65e@rks1.urz.tu-dresden.de>, xn@space.wh1.tu-dresden.de 
wrote:
#Hello
#
#Does anyone knows  a paper or literature that deals with the stability
#of  an enzyme (especially glucoseoxidase  (GOD   EC1.1.3.4  )) after
#immobilization into a polymeric surface. I wonder if the
#immobilization might conservate the enzyme activity for longer time.

I don't have any refs, but think such should be easy to find in > 10 yo 
literature when immobilized enzymes were thought to be the "next great 
thing". Specifically, glucoseoxidase activity, once immobilized on 
sepharose (no personal experience) or in the form of conjugates with Ab
(that's I know for sure), is very stable. By analogy to conjugates, I'd
say that sepharose could could be equilibrated with 50% glycerol or 40% 
ethylene glycole (I like the latter better because of lower viscosity) and
stored at -20C forever. 

- Dima

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sat Nov 02 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!nntp.uio.no!news.nacamar.de!news-kar1.dfn.de!news-stu1.dfn.de!news-mue1.dfn.de!news-nue1.dfn.de!news-lei1.dfn.de!news.uni-leipzig.de!news1.urz.tu-dresden.de!news
From: xn@space.wh1.tu-dresden.de (Anne Riedel)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Q:stability of immobilized enzyme
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 1996 16:51:30 GMT
Organization: TU-Dresden
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <55iiif$65e@rks1.urz.tu-dresden.de>
Reply-To: xn@space.wh1.tu-dresden.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: gaga408.wh1.tu-dresden.de
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

Hello

Does anyone knows  a paper or literature that deals with the stability
of  an enzyme (especially glucoseoxidase  (GOD   EC1.1.3.4  )) after
immobilization into a polymeric surface. I wonder if the
immobilization might conservate the enzyme activity for longer time.

Thanks in advance
Anne

Please reply via e-mail


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sat Nov 02 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!newshost.convex.com!newsgate.duke.edu!news-server.ncren.net!concert!ussun2n.glaxo.com!uswsum.glaxo.com!user
From: sujoy_ghosh@glaxo.com (sujoy ghosh)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: GST fusion proteins HELP
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 15:18:37 -0400
Organization: glaxo wellcome
Lines: 18
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <sujoy_ghosh-2210961518370001@uswsum.glaxo.com>
References: <324AA269.D71@warren.med.harvard.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: uswsum.glaxo.com

In article <324AA269.D71@warren.med.harvard.edu>,
berez@WARREN.MED.HARVARD.EDU wrote:

> I am trying to express a leech homeobox protein in bacteria to make an 
> antibody.  The protein is insoluble.  I followed the Frangioni and 
> Neel paper for solubilizing using sarkosyl.  I get a good amount of 
> the protein into the supernatant, then I add Triton to restore binding 
> to glutathione sepharose but I don't get a good yeild.  I get back the 
> tiniest fraction of what is in the supernatant.  I also seem to get 
> poor elution from the beads.  Any ideas?
> 
> Ashley Bruce


What are your growth conditions? Assuming you are growing your cultures at
37 degrees, try growing them at 20 degrees for 1-3 hours. It might help.

Sujoy

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 03 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!EU.net!sun4nl!wirehub!news.euro.net!xs4all!xs4all!usenet
From: heidel@xs4all.nl (Edwin Heidelberg)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Protein properties
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1996 12:57:24 GMT
Organization: XS4ALL, networking for the masses
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <55kp4t$bh5@news.xs4all.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: asn02-02.dial.xs4all.nl
X-XS4ALL-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1996 13:55:57 MET
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82


Hi there,


I am working for my graduation project an a flowsheeting program,
which we can use to optimise downstream processes. I want to create a
database with properties for proteins from which the user can pick the
components in a mixture.

I have to find properties like:

Molecular weight
Radius
Diffusion Coefficient
Iso Electric Points
Precipitation Coeeficients (Cohn equation)
Sedimentation coefficient

The proteins in the database are:

Catalase
Alpha-amylase
Beta-Galactosidase
and a lot of other familiar proteins.

Before spending a couple of weeks in the library finding all the
properties, does anyone know if there are any links to useful
databanks. Thanks in advance.


Regards


Edwin Heidelberg


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 03 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!online.no!sn.no!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!altitude!usenet
From: "Achim Recktenwald, PhD" <achim@ibex.ca>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Protein Separation
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 1996 15:25:15 -0500
Organization: IBEX Technologies, Inc., Biochemistry, 5485 Pare, Montreal, PQ, H4P 1P7, Canada
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <327A5CAA.11A5@ibex.ca>
References: <01bbc0ec$0e73b720$58fd5380@UT.cc.utexas.edu> <553gbe$meg@ecuador.earthlink.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ibex.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
To: bamsden@prozyme.com

Bruce Amsden wrote:
> 
> "Brett S. Phinney" <brettsp@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> 
> >I need to separate and purify two very similar membrane proteins, and have
> >not been successful so far. They both have a very similar molecular weight
> >and presumably shape, because they only separate on an SDS-PAGE under
> >reducing conditions (unfortunately I need them non-reduced). They also seem
> >to have a similar hydophobicity plot, because I have not been able to
> >separate them using Reversed phase HPLC either. They do have differing
> >isoelectric points and have been separated using IEF in the past, but I
> >have not been able to figure out how to purify my proteins away from the
> >ampolytes.
> 
> >Does anyone have any suggestions on how I can separate and purify these?
> 
> >Any help would be greatly appreciated
> 
> >--
> >Brett Phinney
> >Cell Research Institute
> >University of Texas, Austin
> 
> Once you've purified your protein by IEF, can't you use gel filtration
> chromatography to get rid of the ampholytes?
> 
> Bruce Amsden


The latter usually never works. The stuff sticks to proteins like crazy
glue.

Achim

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 03 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!news.udel.edu!chopin.udel.edu!not-for-mail
From: xiaohan@chopin.udel.edu (Xiaohan Du)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Test only:
Date: 4 Nov 1996 14:17:55 -0500
Organization: University of Delaware
Lines: 2
Sender: Cash@wilmington.trust
Message-ID: <55lfh3$d43@chopin.udel.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chopin.udel.edu

Test only. Please ignore.
:

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 03 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!nntp.uio.no!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!surfnet.nl!news.unisource.nl!xs4all!xs4all!usenet
From: tvink@xs4all.nl (Tom Vink)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: immobilized neuraminidase
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1996 11:07:31 GMT
Organization: XS4ALL, networking for the masses
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <55kis0$8se@news.xs4all.nl>
References: <hornig-0411960944260001@bclutz2.ethz.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mas03-02.dial.xs4all.nl
X-XS4ALL-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1996 12:08:48 MET
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

hornig@bc.biol.ethz.ch (Ruediger Hornig) wrote:

>Hello everybody,

>for removing sialic acid residues from the outside of intact cells, I
>would like to use neuraminidase. Does anybody know who is supplying it
>immobilized on beads or does anybody think of a different way to remove
>the enzyme from the reaction mixture ?

>thanks in advance for your help

>Rudi

>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/    _/    ETH Zurich
>   _/        _/    _/    _/    Biochemie II
>  _/_/_/    _/    _/_/_/_/    Rüdiger Hornig (hornig@bc.biol.ethz.ch)
> _/        _/    _/    _/    Universitaetstr. 16, ETH Zentrum
>_/_/_/_/  _/    _/    _/    CH-8092 Zurich (Switzerland)
>                           Phone: +41 1 632 3007  FAX: +41 1 632 12 69

>         http://www.bc.biol.ethz.ch/BiochemistryII/BioII.html
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Rudi,

You could inactivate the Neuraminidase by adding an inhibitor after
the treatment of the cells.




From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 03 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!news.sgi.com!esiee.fr!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!in2p3.fr!swidir.switch.ch!scsing.switch.ch!elna.ethz.ch!bclutz2.ethz.ch!user
From: hornig@bc.biol.ethz.ch (Ruediger Hornig)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: immobilized neuraminidase
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1996 09:44:26 +0100
Organization: ETH Zurich
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <hornig-0411960944260001@bclutz2.ethz.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bclutz2.ethz.ch

Hello everybody,

for removing sialic acid residues from the outside of intact cells, I
would like to use neuraminidase. Does anybody know who is supplying it
immobilized on beads or does anybody think of a different way to remove
the enzyme from the reaction mixture ?

thanks in advance for your help

Rudi

----------------------------------------------------------------------
    _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/    _/    ETH Zurich
   _/        _/    _/    _/    Biochemie II
  _/_/_/    _/    _/_/_/_/    Rüdiger Hornig (hornig@bc.biol.ethz.ch)
 _/        _/    _/    _/    Universitaetstr. 16, ETH Zentrum
_/_/_/_/  _/    _/    _/    CH-8092 Zurich (Switzerland)
                           Phone: +41 1 632 3007  FAX: +41 1 632 12 69

         http://www.bc.biol.ethz.ch/BiochemistryII/BioII.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 03 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!nntp.uio.no!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!tulane.edu!rs5.tcs.tulane.edu!not-for-mail
From: jayuziuk@rs5.tcs.tulane.edu (Jeffrey Yuziuk)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: immobilized neuraminidase
Date: 4 Nov 1996 15:23:17 GMT
Organization: Tulane University
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <55l1p5$eno@rs10.tcs.tulane.edu>
References: <hornig-0411960944260001@bclutz2.ethz.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rs5.tcs.tulane.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]

Dear Rudi,

You can make the immobilized neuraminidase yourself. It is quite easy.
Just follow the standard methods for affinity column preparation, but of
course, use a method/matrix that doesn't inactivate your enzyme. A student
in my lab did it with no problem and it worked great!

Jeff

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 03 22:00:00 1996
Message-ID: <327E00C0.418A@uni-konstanz.de>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1996 15:42:08 +0100
From: Bernd Langkau <bernd.langkau@uni-konstanz.de>
Reply-To: bernd.langkau@uni-konstanz.de
Organization: University of Constance
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.hiv,bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molbio.yeast
CC: Bernd.Langkau, Thomas.Seebacher
Subject: Molbio-Software (Macintosh)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: toprope.verwaltung.uni-konstanz.de
Lines: 7
Path: biosci!daresbury!nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!due.unit.no!nntp.uio.no!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!mr.net!newshub.tc.umn.edu!fu-berlin.de!news.belwue.de!news.uni-konstanz.de!toprope.verwaltung.uni-konstanz.de
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.hiv:2624 bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:51140 bionet.molbio.proteins:9194 bionet.molbio.yeast:6070

A new program for the evaluation of gel images is available from
http://www.uni-konstanz.de/tt/software/mwmacro.html or from
ftp://ftp.uni-konstanz.de/pub/local/Biologie/MW-Macro.sea.bin. 

The new shareware program (50.-DM) calculates molecular weights,
pI-values and band intensities from scanned gel images. The program
requires Macintosh computers and NIH-Image software.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 04 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!CS.Arizona.EDU!news.Arizona.EDU!hamblin.math.byu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.uoregon.edu!news.ironhorse.com!newshub.csu.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!uunet!in3.uu.net!netnews.worldnet.att.net!newsadm
From: clkstanley@postoffice.worldnet.att.net
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Best way to clean cuvettes?
Date: 5 Nov 1996 04:56:00 GMT
Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <55mhd0$gpk@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net>
References: <3263EF78.3D54@topaz.microbio.uab.edu> <542agq$p33@winx03.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <54kr3l$82f@info-server.surrey.ac.uk> <54n9td$1n3@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de> <55d4lk$aed@info-server.surrey.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 165.238.84.241
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22ATT (Windows; U; 16bit)
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:51172 bionet.molbio.proteins:9199

I have used both quartz and disposable, and quatrz bears the bell away as 
far as reproducibility. Call me old-fashioned, but I would trust a result 
from a quartz cuvette ove a result from a plastic one anyday.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 04 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!CS.Arizona.EDU!news.Arizona.EDU!hamblin.math.byu.edu!acs2.byu.edu!news.cuny.edu!news.sprintlink.net!news-hub.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.alt.net!newspost1.alt.net!usenet
From: belcom@public.bta.net.cn
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Need help urgently !!!
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 1996 16:37:40 GMT
Organization: Altopia Corp. - Affordable Usenet Access - http://www.alt.net
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <327f6cfc.6641315@news.alt.net>
Reply-To: belcom@public.bta.net.cn
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.182

>HELP! HELP! HELP!
>
>One Chinese lady (49 years old) has been found a special disease which
>could not get medicine and treatment in China. This disease happened one in
>millions of people. The doctor's dianosis is as following:
>
>1) Tongue Biopsy: Amyloidosis
>
>2) Kidney Biopsy: Mild Mesangial proliferation GN
>
>3) Past history:
>
>        a. Thyroidectomy due to hyperthyroidism for 8 years
>
>        b. Post-operation of carpal tunnel syndrome for 1 year
>
>We need your help on finding new methods and new medicine to treat this
> disease.
>Thank you very much. Please help urgently!
>
>E-mail address: belcom@public.bta.net.cn
>



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 04 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!amgen!usenet
From: John Philo <jphilo@amgen.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: basic molarity/curie question
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 1996 13:37:37 -0800
Organization: Amgen Inc.
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <327FB3A1.69E1@amgen.com>
References: <otterpop-ya023180000411962248480001@news.msu.edu>
Reply-To: jphilo@amgen.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
To: Otter <otterpop@pilot.msu.edu>

Otter wrote:
> 
> I am trying to figure out the molarity of my reaction.  I am using
> tritiated s-adenosyl-methionine which has a specific activity of 55.1
> Ci/mmol.  I am using 2 micro Ci in my reactions.  How many micro moles is
> that?  Since I am trying to learn how to perform this calculation, can you
> please show me how you come up with the molarity.

To get the total number of moles you divide the number of curies by the
specific activity. To get things in the units you want, first convert
the specific activity from 55.1 Ci/mmol to .0551 Ci/micromol and the
amount you are using to 2E-6 Ci.  Then you have (2E-6 Ci)/(.0551
Ci/micromol) = 3.63E-5 micromol = 3.63E-11 mol

To come up with the molarity, you must divide the number of moles (not
micromoles) by the volume in which this activity is dispersed, in
liters.  If, for example, your sample is 100 microliters then the
molarity is
(3.63E-11 mol) / (1E-4 liter) = 3.63E-7 molar

'Hope this helps.
 
John Philo, Protein Chemistry
Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
jphilo@amgen.com
*** Disclaimer: These are the opinions of the poster not Amgen Inc.***

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 04 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: David Stepp <dstepp@post.its.mcw.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.biology.cardiovascular,bionet.metabolic-reg,bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.evolution,bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molecules.peptides,bionet.neuroscience
Subject: Physiologic Application of Molecular Biology
Date: 5 Nov 1996 16:38:08 -0800
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Madison
Lines: 24
Sender: biohelp@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.90.961105162843.10146F-100000-100000@post.its.mcw.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net
Xref: biosci bionet.biology.cardiovascular:1263 bionet.metabolic-reg:869 bionet.molbio.ageing:3035 bionet.molbio.evolution:5287 bionet.molbio.proteins:9202 bionet.molecules.peptides:494 bionet.neuroscience:16569


Many of us spend our days (and nights!) cloning, expressing and/or
knocking out genes that interest us.  Often times, however, we are too 
deep in the trees and lose sight of what our gene's function is in the 
context of a whole animal or even at the organ level.  I would be 
interested to know what level of enthusiasm there is out there for 
studying the physiology of your favorite gene.  If you are overexpressing 
a transcription factor that regulates cardiac gene expression, for 
example, what effect does this have on cardiac performance, blood 
pressure etc.? 

Granting agencies are asking for more than molecular biology these days;
they want relevance to a physiological or pathophysiological process. 
Within this context, would you be interested in learning physiology 
techniques (blood pressure measurements, cardiac and smooth contractility,
shear stress, electrophysiology etc) in a 2-3 week course as a means of
broadening your knowledge base and enhancing your experimental research??
 
Please forward your thoughts and comments to jmiano@post.its.mcw.edu.
 
Thanks in advance!
 

Joe Miano & David W. Stepp

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 04 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!CS.Arizona.EDU!news.Arizona.EDU!hamblin.math.byu.edu!acs2.byu.edu!news.cuny.edu!news.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-pen-16.sprintlink.net!news.up.net!news.mtu.edu!msunews!otterpop
From: otterpop@pilot.msu.edu (Otter)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: basic molarity/curie question
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1996 22:48:48 -0500
Organization: Michigan State University
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <otterpop-ya023180000411962248480001@news.msu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pm166-04.dialip.mich.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MSUnetID: otterpop
X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.3.1

I am trying to figure out the molarity of my reaction.  I am using
tritiated s-adenosyl-methionine which has a specific activity of 55.1
Ci/mmol.  I am using 2 micro Ci in my reactions.  How many micro moles is
that?  Since I am trying to learn how to perform this calculation, can you
please show me how you come up with the molarity.

Thanks for your time and help,

Otter

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 04 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!uunet!in3.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!audrey01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: danter1@aol.com
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Tech/Postdoc Bethesda, MD
Date: 6 Nov 1996 02:59:26 GMT
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) (1.10)
Lines: 87
Sender: news@aol.com
Message-ID: <19961106030200.WAA16744@ladder01.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder01.news-fddi.aol.com

I would like to recruit one highly motivated individual to be the first
person to work with me in my new research lab as either a technician,
postdoc or research assistant. You can have a BS, MS or Ph.D. and the
salary will be commensurate with your experience and what I think you can
bring to my lab. The salary range is from $22K to $32K and includes
benefits i.e. health insurance, you must be a US citizen, and must be
willing to work in the Bethesda, MD area, and must be willing to start by
1 Feb. 1997 or sooner. Funding is available for two years and possibly
longer. A first-time postdoc would be expected to write postdoctoral
fellowships. The perfect individual for this job would have to be
competent in molecular biology i.e. in designing and constructing
plasmids, making and purifying fusion proteins from bacteria, PCR, site
directed mutagenesis and random mutagenesis methods, doing plasmid preps,
etc. He/she would also have experience running protein and agarose gels,
western blotting, working SAFELY with radioisotopes, and performing
immunofluorescence experiments. Experience with EM a plus. He/she would
have experience working with Saccharomyces cerevisiae i.e. growing strains
in liquid and on solid medium, doing gene disruptions, tetrad dissection,
and experience with 2-hybrid or other genetic screening methods would be a
plus. You have to be willing to work with rabbits and mice (these will not
be your co-workers and the lab doesn't have mice, I think?). The fusion
proteins will be used to make polyclonal antibodies in rabbits and I will
also want to "raise" ascites from monoclonal hybridoma cell lines in mice.
The person would also be familiar with the Macintosh OS and be able to
learn Filemaker Pro, Nisuswriter, DNAStar software, Photoshop, Canvas, and
Cricketgraph. The candidate need only have a subset of these skills and no
one is expected to have all of them.

One project which you may work on involves defining the function of a new
protein required for exocytosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. If you work
on this project, you would be expected to epitope tag the protein for
immunoprecipitation experiments and for immunofluorescence localization,
make temperature sensitive (or other conditional mutant) alleles of this
gene, and look for genetic interactions between your mutants and other
late-acting sec mutants. You would make fusion proteins to make polyclonal
antibodies in rabbits and do genetic screens, either 2-hybrid or
suppression screens of your mutants, to look for interacting gene
products. A postdoc would be encouraged to develop his own project
consistent with the goals of my lab.

I am Daniel TerBush and I have been recently appointed Assistant Professor
in the Department of Biochemistry at the F. Edward Hebert School of
Medicine at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in
the Bethesda, MD. My appointment started 1
November 1996. If you respond, I will send you a follow-up E-mail with
more
information about USUHS. I did my Ph.D. work in Dr. Ronald Holz's lab at
the
University of Michigan studying exocytosis in bovine adrenal chromaffin
cells. I have recently completed a postdoc in Peter Novick's laboratory at
Yale University where I have identified a multiprotein complex required
for exocytosis in yeast (TerBush and Novick, 1995, July, JCB 130:
299-312).

To respond to this advertisement, send a cover letter and C.V. to
danter1@aol.com. In the cover letter please confirm in the first paragraph
that you are a US citizen (unfortunately I can't fund a non-US citizen),
that working in the Bethesda, MD area is OK and that you can start by 1
Feb. 1997. Tell me in a general way about your work experience and cover
anything that isn't necessarily easy to fit into a C.V. (For instance, I
started a Macintosh computer repair company as a graduate student to make
extra money but this is not something that fits nicely on a scientific
C.V.). Also, tell me what level of education you have BS, MS or Ph.D. and
the type of position you are looking for. Depending on the number of
responses I receive, I may not reply right away but I will try to respond
to all applications. You will have to be willing to come to me to be
interviewed since I do not have funding to pay for your visit. Please keep
this in mind when if you respond to this listing. 

Finally, I just wanted to comment on why the "position title" is not more
focused, i.e. postdoc only, or technician only, etc. Since you are the
first person I am hiring, I would like someone with a lot of technical
skill i.e. a postdoc or experienced technician. But I am willing to
consider someone less experienced with a burning desire to learn and do
research and willing to commit at least two years of time to my lab. If
you are applying as a postdoc, currently I do not have a technician. I
expect to have additional funding in April which will allow me to hire
one, but until then (or if the funding falls through) you will have to be
willing to share with me and any graduate students the "lab chores". I
have the attitude that if something needs to get done then I'll do it
myself and postdoctoral candidates and research assistants should share
this attitude. If you are applying as a technician, you will be getting
stuck with a lot of the "lab chores" as part of your job responsibilities.
However, as money becomes available I'll try to hire a lab aide to make
solutions and pour plates to give you more time to do science.



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Nov 05 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!botany.uq.edu.au!J.Marcus
From: J.Marcus@botany.uq.edu.au ("Marcus, Dr J.")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Sensitive peptide assay?
Date: 6 Nov 1996 14:37:27 -0800
Organization: Dept of Botany, Univ of Qld
Lines: 55
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <CCB5FE10CC2@botany.uq.edu.au>
Reply-To: Marcus@tpp.uq.edu.au
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hi Cornelius,

You wrote:
> I wonder whether there is a sensitive peptide assay being
> able to detect between 10 pmol and 1 nmol of a peptide.  I
> was thinking about UV detection at 214 nm but I think that
> the extinction coefficient is not high enough (when I
> assume that it's 1000 per peptide bond -- which is just a
> wild guess -- I would be able to detect 1 nmol / 100 ul).
> 
> Any ideas?

Do you need to know the concentration or just find out if 
your peptide is there?

Assuming you want to quantitate, here are some thougths 
that may or may not be useful...

1) A very good method for accurate quantitation is acid 
hydrolysis followed by amino acid analysis.

2) Perhaps a less time consuming way would be to run your 
peptide on an RP-HPLC column and look at 214nm absorbance.  
100 microgram/ml concentration should give an absorbance of 
around 1 at 214nm.  Peaks of 0.01 Absorbance should easily 
be detectable; that translates to 1 microgram/ml 
concentration.  If your protein peak is about 0.5 ml in 
volume then you would have 0.5 micrograms of protein.  So, 
if your protein is say 10,000 Da you would be detecting 50 
pmols of protein.  If your protein was 100,000 Da your 
would be detecting 5 pmol.  Not bad if you ask me.  The 
nice thing here is that you can get your protein back. 

3) If you have enough sample and your don't mind using some 
of it up you can do a micro BCA assay.  Pierce sell the 
reagents but the mix is easy to make yourself.

I hope that is useful.

Sincerely,
John Marcus




_________________________________________________________
John Marcus            Marcus@tpp.uq.edu.au (Dr J.Marcus)
Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Plant Pathology
5th Level John Hines Building
University of Queensland
St. Lucia, QLD 4072
AUSTRALIA

Fax: 61-7-3365-4771
Phone: 61-7-3365-4764

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Nov 05 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!sally.ogs.co.uk
From: Sally Prime <sallyp@ogs.co.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: 2D PAGE quantitation software
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 19:05:57 +0000
Organization: Oxford Glycosciences
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <3280E195.58F6@ogs.co.uk>
References: <3277E4E7.3E5B@durham.ac.uk>
Reply-To: sallyp@ogs.co.uk
NNTP-Posting-Host: sally.ogs.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: sally.ogs.co.uk
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Is anyone aware of any cheap, or better still free software for
> quantifying and comparing 2D PAGE protein patterns?  WWW address, E-mail
> number or other contact address would be useful.

I am not aware of any cheap 2D PAGE quantitation and matching software,
possibly due to the fact that it is complex and expensive software to
produce. For a serious package at lowish cost, try the Phoretix 2D
package, which runs on NT. 

--
--------------------------------------------
Sally Prime Ph.D.,       sallyp@ogs.co.uk
Oxford Glycosciences,    T (+44) 1235 543225
Unit 4 Hitching Court,   F (+44) 1235 554701
Blacklands Way,
Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 1RG

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Nov 05 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!newspump.sol.net!news-peer.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news-lond.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!netcom.net.uk!nntpfeed.doc.ic.ac.uk!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!sunews!suma3!sapgdfel
From: Ian Goodfellow <sapgdfel@reading.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Convert protein sequence to DNA
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 11:52:05 +0000
Organization: University of Reading, U.K.
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.95.961104115022.20631A-100000@suma3.reading.ac.uk>
References: <98E7055D3A@medlib2.kku.ac.th>
NNTP-Posting-Host: suma3-e2.reading.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
To: SURASAK WONGRATANACHEEWIN <SURAS-W@MEDLIB2.KKU.AC.TH>
In-Reply-To: <98E7055D3A@medlib2.kku.ac.th>

On 23 Oct 1996, SURASAK WONGRATANACHEEWIN wrote:

> Hi Netters,
> 
>     Anybody there can tell me how to convert the protein sequences 
> into correct DNA sequences (DNA of pseudomonas)? 
> 
>     Thanks for help.
>     
>     Surasak

HI,

the ideal program is Backtranslate from the GCG packages or is it egcg -
anyway one of them is ideal. You can make a codon usage chart from Pseudo.
if there isn't one available and the program will use that to predict the
most likely sequence.

If you want any more details - just email me directly

Regards

Ian

Ian Goodfellow
I.G.Goodfellow@reading.ac.uk


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Nov 05 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!news.sgi.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!netcom.net.uk!news.u-net.com!yama.mcc.ac.uk!liv!rgu.ac.uk!news
From: 933467u@app_science.rgu.ac.uk
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Cost of Epogen Production / Treatment.
Date: 1 Nov 1996 21:01:02 GMT
Organization: Computer Sevices Unit, The Robet Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <55doee$smj@news.rgu.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: novixint.rgu.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

To anyone who can help me,

I'm a forth year student at the Robert Gordon Universtiy in Aberdeen, 
Scotland.  I'm desperately seeking information on some of the economic 
implications of synthetically produced Erythropoietin (AKA EPO, Epogen, 
etc.).  Can anyone tell me how much it would cost to produce say, 100ml 
of the stuff?  How much would it cost to treat a patient with EPO for a 
month?

If no-one can answer my questions directly,  I'd appreciate it if someone 
could suggest where I might find the information I need.

Thanks for your time folks,  Alan Mercer.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Nov 05 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!news.alaska.edu!newsfeed.acns.nwu.edu!news.cc.uic.edu!usenet
From: "Edward B. Arias" <earias1@uic.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Need help with GST fusion protein purification
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 1996 19:15:26 -0500
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <327D359E.3132@uic.edu>
Reply-To: Dept., of, Physiology, &, Biophysics
NNTP-Posting-Host: k034.phyb.uic.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; U)

I'm having a problem purifying a 104 kDa GST fusion protein with the
Pharmacia kit.  I've tried most of the trouble shooting tips to no
avail.  One ref in the manual takes about losing GST fusion
protein:glutathione sepharose beads affinity if your fusion protein is
80+ kDa.  I'm a grad student and this is the last thing I must do to
graduate...that is purify out some of my protein which is 75 kDa (+ the
29 kDa GST = 104 kDa fusion protein which gets bound to the beads).

Any help or comments with those using the GST fusion protein kit from
Pharmacia with similar problems is greatly appreciated.
-- 
Edward B. Arias  -  "Just Say Know"
UIC Dept of Physiology & Biophysics
835 S. Wolcott Ave.
Chicago, IL 60612-7342
Tel:	312.996.4161
FAX:	312.996.1414
E-mail:	earias1@uic.edu
WWW:	http://www.uic.edu/~earias1

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Nov 05 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!nntp.uio.no!news.nacamar.de!fu-berlin.de!zrz.TU-Berlin.DE!news-ber1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!news-kar1.dfn.de!news-stu1.dfn.de!news-mue1.dfn.de!news-nue1.dfn.de!uni-erlangen.de!winx03!wpxx02!not-for-mail
From: krasel@wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de (Cornelius Krasel)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Sensitive peptide assay?
Date: 6 Nov 1996 17:55:34 GMT
Organization: University of Wuerzburg, Germany
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <55qjem$kt0@winx03.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]

I wonder whether there is a sensitive peptide assay being able to detect
between 10 pmol and 1 nmol of a peptide.  I was thinking about UV detection
at 214 nm but I think that the extinction coefficient is not high
enough (when I assume that it's 1000 per peptide bond -- which is just
a wild guess -- I would be able to detect 1 nmol / 100 ul).

Any ideas?

--Cornelius.

-- 
/* Cornelius Krasel, U Wuerzburg, Dept. of Pharmacology, Versbacher Str. 9 */
/* D-97078 Wuerzburg, Germany   email: phak004@rzbox.uni-wuerzburg.de  SP3 */
/* "Science is the game we play with God to find out what His rules are."  */

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Nov 05 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!netnews.com!ix.netcom.com!news
From: bellew@ix.netcom.com (Leo Bellew)
Newsgroups: bionet.biology.cardiovascular,bionet.metabolic-reg,bionet.molbio.ageing,bionet.molbio.evolution,bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molecules.peptides,bionet.neuroscience
Subject: Re: Physiologic Application of Molecular Biology
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 1996 02:52:47 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <32824be3.49540134@nntp.ix.netcom.com>
References: <Pine.ULT.3.90.961105162843.10146F-100000-100000@post.its.mcw.edu>
Reply-To: bellew@ix.netcom.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: phi-pa11-56.ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Nov 06  6:56:03 PM PST 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99f/32.299
Xref: biosci bionet.biology.cardiovascular:1267 bionet.metabolic-reg:870 bionet.molbio.ageing:3037 bionet.molbio.evolution:5290 bionet.molbio.proteins:9210 bionet.molecules.peptides:497 bionet.neuroscience:16596

I have been the architect or chief engineer on many high-tech computer
software projects over the last 30 years where we have developed
computer models of reality in many different situations utilizing
engineering devices borrowed from areas such as artificial language
and automata theory. I am very interested in the potential for
utilizing these technologies in mapping the human genome to
physiological function. In your note, you seem to imply that the
relationships are known, at least in respect to the physiology
techniques the course would be devoted to. Can you tell me if the
problem of relating the human genome to physiological function is
largely solved, and what formal mental, mathematical or simulative
models provide the loci for that solution.

Leo Bellew

On 5 Nov 1996 16:38:08 -0800, David Stepp <dstepp@post.its.mcw.edu>
wrote:

>
>Many of us spend our days (and nights!) cloning, expressing and/or
>knocking out genes that interest us.  Often times, however, we are too 
>deep in the trees and lose sight of what our gene's function is in the 
>context of a whole animal or even at the organ level.  I would be 
>interested to know what level of enthusiasm there is out there for 
>studying the physiology of your favorite gene.  If you are overexpressing 
>a transcription factor that regulates cardiac gene expression, for 
>example, what effect does this have on cardiac performance, blood 
>pressure etc.? 
>
>Granting agencies are asking for more than molecular biology these days;
>they want relevance to a physiological or pathophysiological process. 
>Within this context, would you be interested in learning physiology 
>techniques (blood pressure measurements, cardiac and smooth contractility,
>shear stress, electrophysiology etc) in a 2-3 week course as a means of
>broadening your knowledge base and enhancing your experimental research??
> 
>Please forward your thoughts and comments to jmiano@post.its.mcw.edu.
> 
>Thanks in advance!
> 
>
>Joe Miano & David W. Stepp


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Nov 06 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!warwick!leicester!usenet
From: "Dr E. Buxbaum" <EB15@le.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: basic molarity/curie question
Date: 6 Nov 1996 19:24:46 GMT
Organization: University of Leicester, UK (PCFS User)
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <55qolu$q8o@falcon.le.ac.uk>
References: <otterpop-ya023180000411962248480001@news.msu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc47.msb.le.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)

otterpop@pilot.msu.edu (Otter) wrote:
>I am trying to figure out the molarity of my reaction.  I am using
>tritiated s-adenosyl-methionine which has a specific activity of 55.1
>Ci/mmol.  I am using 2 micro Ci in my reactions.  How many micro moles is
>that?  Since I am trying to learn how to perform this calculation, can you
>please show me how you come up with the molarity.
>
>Thanks for your time and help,
>
>Otter

if 1 mmol has 55.1 Ci, then 2 uCi correspond to 0.000002 Ci * 0.001 mol / 
55.1 Ci = 36.3 pmol. Divide this by the volume of your assay (in 
liter) and you get your concentration in pmol/l or pM.

The trick is always to work in basal units. Write down all walues with 
their units and check, that the result will have the correct unit. Then 
do the calculation itself. 

By the way, strictly speaking you should be working with Bq, not Ci.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Nov 06 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!sn.no!nntp.uio.no!nntp.zit.th-darmstadt.de!fu-berlin.de!news.belwue.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news
From: Joerg Freigang <joerg.freigang@uni-konstanz.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Refolding problem
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 1996 16:26:17 +0100
Organization: Universitaet Konstanz
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <3281FF98.41C6@uni-konstanz.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: loop3.biologie.uni-konstanz.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP9)

I am trying to refold a protein belonging to the IGSF from inclusion
bodies. The protein contains two disulfide bonds and a his-tag. I tried
the refolding procedure developed by R. Rudolph for Fab-fragments as
well as some other standart refolding procedures, but I couldn't get any
detectable amounts of monodispers protein.
Any suggestions what the problem could be and what else should be tried?
Even 1 % of correctly folded protein would be enough.

Joerg
 --- 
Joerg Freigang
email: Joerg.Freigang@uni-konstanz.de     Tel: +49 7531 88 2211
Fakultaet fuer Biologie, Universitaet Konstanz
Postfach 5560, M 656, D-78434 Konstanz, Germany

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Nov 06 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!news.sgi.com!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!altitude!usenet
From: "Achim Recktenwald, PhD" <achim@ibex.ca>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Best way to clean cuvettes?
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 1996 07:36:22 -0500
Organization: IBEX Technologies, Inc., Biochemistry, 5485 Pare, Montreal, PQ, H4P 1P7, Canada
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <3281D7C5.1699@ibex.ca>
References: <3263EF78.3D54@topaz.microbio.uab.edu> <542agq$p33@winx03.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <54kr3l$82f@info-server.surrey.ac.uk> <54n9td$1n3@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de> <55d4lk$aed@info-server.surrey.ac.uk> <55mhd0$gpk@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ibex.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
To: clkstanley@postoffice.worldnet.att.net
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:51273 bionet.molbio.proteins:9215

clkstanley@postoffice.worldnet.att.net wrote:
> 
> I have used both quartz and disposable, and quatrz bears the bell away as
> far as reproducibility. Call me old-fashioned, but I would trust a result
> from a quartz cuvette ove a result from a plastic one anyday.


I agree, if you want to do serious spectroscopy, esp. in the lower
wavelengths, you should use quartz cuvettes. For the range >400nm it
might not be that necessary. 

Achim

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Nov 06 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!CS.SANDIA.GOV!scistra
From: scistra@CS.SANDIA.GOV (Sorin C. Istrail)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: RECOMB97: Hotel Reservation and Registration Information
Date: 7 Nov 1996 15:39:59 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 114
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199611072333.QAA14895@frodo2.cs.sandia.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net



Please call the ElDorado hotel and make your reservation AS SOON
AS POSSIBLE. This is a four-star and four-diamond hotel and we have 
a limited number of rooms avaiblable. ElDorado will direct the 
overflow to another hotel.



FIRST ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
      COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

                RECOMB 97
      http://www.cs.sandia.gov/recomb97

           January 20-23, 1997                     
             Eldorado Hotel
           Santa Fe, New Mexico
                     
              Sponsored by        
                 SIGACT

            with support from        
            SLOAN Foundation 
          US Department of Energy





ELDORADO HOTEL RESERVATIONS INFORMATION

**** A four-star, four diamond-hotel ****

Phones:

  1-800 955-4455
  505-988-4455

Fax:

  505-995-4544
  (reservations only)

Webpage:

  http://www.eldoradohotel.com

Email:
 
  rez@eldoradohotel.com

Room Rates:

 Single/double $85 

  Sunday(1/19), Monday(1/20), Tuesday(1/21), 
  Wednesday(1/22), Thursday(1/23), Friday(1/24)
  Saturday (1/25)


 Single/Double $135

  Saturday(1/18)

(For comparison, if reservations are not made at the 
RECOMB97 group rate, the average single/double rate would be $144 
for these types of rooms.)




RECOMB97 REGISTRATION INFORMATION

A registration form can be obtained from the conference web page
http://www.cs.sandia.gov/recomb97

Advanced Registration

  ACM Member     Non-ACM Member
  $285           $360

Late/On-site Registration (After December 12)

  ACM Member     Non-ACM Member
  $360           $435

Full time student

  Advanced Registration                         $160
  Late/On-site Registration (After Decemebr 12) $210

Registration fee includes: one copy of the proceedings,
four lunches, eight coffee breaks, and a banquet ticket.
Student registration fee includes all of the above except
the banquet ticket.

For more information check out the conference web page
http://www.cs.sandia.gov/recomb97

or contact

  Sorin Istrail
  RECOMB97 Conference Chair
  Sandia National Laboratories                     
  Massively Parallel Computing Research Laboratory 
  MS 1110                                          
  Albuquerque, NM 87185-1110                       

  Phone: (505) 845-7612                            
  Fax  : (505) 845-7442                            
  Secretary: (505) 845-7432
  Email: scistra@cs.sandia.gov                     
  www  : http://www.cs.sandia.gov/~scistra         

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Nov 07 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!iata.csic.es!poseva
From: poseva@iata.csic.es (Eva Dupille)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: TCA precipitation
Date: 8 Nov 1996 01:11:23 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 11
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <01BBCD5C.B2A71400@alzacarias.iata.csic.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hello,
I have a protein problem precipitation. I did a TCA precipitation, 15 % =
for 1 h at 4 C, and I got, nothing at all.
Sure that I have proteins, I get enzyme activity and with biorad, before =
precipitation, I have around 10 micrograms/ml.
Is it a problem of temperature or incubation time ??
Please, if you have some comments, let me know. That s boring to lose so =
many time in protein purification, to lose all the samples for a protein =
precipitation problem ..
Thanks in advance, sorry for the approximative english.
Eve

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Nov 07 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov!cpk-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!warwick!bignews.shef.ac.uk!usenet
From: PMA95SSK@shef.ac.uk (Fade To  Black)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: REQ: Amonia disease ( sad but true )
Date: 8 Nov 1996 23:35:46 GMT
Organization: Nothing man
Lines: 64
Message-ID: <560g4i$ijg@bignews.shef.ac.uk>
Reply-To: PMA95SSK@shef.ac.uk ( Fade To Black)
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc021049.shef.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7


Hello,

I would like to know about 'Amonia disease' known as 'body odor.
Since I have a serious problem with that disease, I have to know about
this as possible as I can. What an annoying disease I have!
My life is getting worse day by day. I just can't stand this feeling anymore.
 I need to define things stighten out my brians otherwise I'll go insane.
Of course,Sure I got a pride. I 've been hurt by many people . They just can't 
stand myself.
If they are jealous of me in many ways, it's so easy for them to make fun of 
me in public.
I was forced to sacrifice lots of things due to that disease.
I'm not fat. I do exercise everyday . ( Running , playing sports , going to 
gym )
I just always had to face the fact. Time is the time, I have a right to live 
like others.
Obviously, I went to see the doctor about my rare but awful disease.
Initially, I was branded as ' paranoid ' by him. Believe me, I had to persuade 
him in 10 minteus.
It's weird, cos doctor's are used to patient's various odor. So basically, 
they don't have a sensitive nose
as others do. The truth is not to be denied. The truth surely pays. 
I fully understand my GP's situation. My case is very rare. I'm not 
intelligent or talented on particular thing.
But I 'm very careful & patient man. In fact, it's a sad thing to know that my 
life is going to the edge.
I have always believed that the search for the meaning of life has been a
futile one.  It's a cliche, but the meaning of life is simply to enjoy
every minute, every second, that life throws at me. I became 21 recently. Life 
is really crap on the work front.
But I 'm thankful to the people who were always cheering me up.
Yeap  , people have a tendency to make fun of other's weakness , sadly I am 
one of those.
The guilty surely pays. I did my best. I just can't help it. It's natural.
Well, I do take a shower or bath as many times as I can. Doesn't work. I 
invested lots of money for perfume.
It wasn't helpful neither. Do I need a diet? Well.

Thanks a lot.

Yours sincerely.

P.S This is serious. Believe or not, my account ( pc novell ) was disabled by 
the supervisor , cos
some people had compalined about my article last june. 
-- 
            __          _       _    
       __| |       |   /  \    |      |[] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - []
   \__        | |       /      |   \   [] -*REMEMBER:Death is nature's way[]
         \              _        |\    [] -* to  tell you to slow down.   []
    _ ___/    |_    /        \  _    _|[] -*                              []
     
     Stan 's web page : http://www.shef.ac.uk/students/pm/pma95ssk  
                ======= E-Mail :PMA95SSK@shef.ac.uk ======
       __~@   __~@           __~@        Run                   -----   __~@
    _-\__<,_-\__<,        _-\__<,     for your life...       -----  _-\__<,
   (*)/' ((*)/' (*)      (*)/' (*)                          -----  (*)/' (*)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* This sadness must go on - 
       From the late Van Gough's last word **
   
                      


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Nov 07 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!MANI.CBS.UMN.EDU!npv
From: npv@MANI.CBS.UMN.EDU (Nora Plesofsky-Vig)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: re: TCA ppt
Date: 8 Nov 1996 12:16:54 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 7
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <9611082017.AA02114@mani.cbs.umn.edu>
Reply-To: nora@biosci.cbs.umn.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

I have had trouble in the past with TCA precipitation, due to not  
removing enough of the TCA after the precipitation. I have found that  
washing three times with cold acetone after TCA precipitation gave  
fine yield of protein. 


Nora Plesofsky-Vig

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Nov 07 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!feed1.news.erols.com!hunter.premier.net!hammer.uoregon.edu!csulb.edu!not-for-mail
From: cohlberg@csulb.edu (Jeff Cohlberg)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: TCA precipitation
Date: 8 Nov 1996 17:35:52 GMT
Organization: Cal State Long Beach
Lines: 14
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <55vr1o$ku0@hatathli.csulb.edu>
References: <01BBCD5C.B2A71400@alzacarias.iata.csic.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: skimmer.csulb.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]

Eva Dupille (poseva@iata.csic.es) wrote:
: Hello,
: I have a protein problem precipitation. I did a TCA precipitation, 15 % =
: for 1 h at 4 C, and I got, nothing at all.

The efficiency of TCA precipitation often depends on salt concentration.
If you're trying to precipitate from a dilute buffer, try adding 0.2 M
NaCl before adding the TCA.
 -- 
Jeffrey A. Cohlberg, Professor
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
California State University, Long Beach
1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840
Phone: (310) 985-4944	FAX: (310) 985-8557   E-mail: cohlberg@csulb.edu

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Nov 07 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!nntp.uio.no!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!oleane!plug.news.pipex.net!pipex!hole.news.pipex.net!pipex!bowl.news.pipex.net!pipex!news00.sunet.se!sunic!news99.sunet.se!umdac!news
From: "Pär Wästerby" <pwy@chem.umu.se>
Newsgroups: bionet.cellbiol,bionet.general,bionet.info-theory,bionet.metabolic-reg,bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molecules.peptides,bionet.structural-nmr,sci.med.pharmacy
Subject: A novel Progesterone Researsh Project
Date: 8 Nov 1996 13:40:17 GMT
Organization: Fysikalisk kemi
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <01bbcd58$e8fc8520$3024ef82@pepsi>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pepsi.chem.umu.se
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1155
Xref: biosci bionet.cellbiol:5894 bionet.general:23924 bionet.info-theory:4368 bionet.metabolic-reg:871 bionet.molbio.proteins:9221 bionet.molecules.peptides:501 bionet.structural-nmr:1598 sci.med.pharmacy:36113

Dear all,
we would really apprecieate if there is someone that could give us
information about Progesterone and its metabolites. Since we are going to
do chromotographic separation, we are interested in physical data,
structure data and acid - base properties (pKa values). It would also be
very helpful to find a review aritcle in the area.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Nov 07 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!howland.erols.net!EU.net!usenet2.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!uknet!bhamcs!news.ox.ac.uk!is.bbsrc.ac.uk!news
From: Mick Partis <mick.partis@hri.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: TCA precipitation
Date: 8 Nov 1996 10:53:07 GMT
Organization: Horticulture Research International
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <55v3ej$ius@is.bbsrc.ac.uk>
References: <01BBCD5C.B2A71400@alzacarias.iata.csic.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc0233.hriw.bbsrc.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

poseva@iata.csic.es (Eva Dupille) wrote:
>Hello,
>I have a protein problem precipitation. I did a TCA precipitation, 15 % 
>for 1 h at 4 C, and I got, nothing at all.
>Sure that I have proteins, I get enzyme activity and with biorad, before 
>precipitation, I have around 10 micrograms/ml.
>Is it a problem of temperature or incubation time ??
>Please, if you have some comments, let me know. That s boring to lose so 
>many time in protein purification, to lose all the samples for a protein 
>precipitation problem ..
>Thanks in advance, sorry for the approximative english.
>Eve

You don't say why you want to precipitate your protein:  if you are 
running assays and just want to get rid of the protein then 15% TCA 
should inactivate.  If you need a precipitate then why not add a carrier 
protein?  Adding some serum albumin (or any cheap, pure protein) at about 
1 mg/ml before adding your TCA and your protein should co-precipitate.  
If you are precpitating prior to running SDS-PAGE, just make sure the MW 
of the carrier protein is different from that of your protein.

Mick
-- 
mick.partis@hri.ac.uk         Horticulture Research International
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1957/



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Nov 07 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!news-stkh.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!eru.mt.luth.se!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.mathworks.com!enews.sgi.com!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!cph-1.news.DK.net!dkuug!dknet!funny.bahnhof.se!seunet!news2.swip.net!mn6.swip.net!news00.sunet.se!sunic!news99.sunet.se!umdac!news
From: "Pär Wästerby" <pwy@chem.umu.se>
Newsgroups: bionet.general,bionet.info-theory,bionet.metabolic-reg,bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molecules.peptides,sci.med.pharmacy
Subject: A novel Progesterone Researsh Project
Date: 8 Nov 1996 13:52:12 GMT
Organization: Fysikalisk kemi
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <01bbcd7b$e9d3bd60$3024ef82@pepsi>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pepsi.chem.umu.se
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1155
Xref: biosci bionet.general:23937 bionet.info-theory:4372 bionet.metabolic-reg:873 bionet.molbio.proteins:9226 bionet.molecules.peptides:504 sci.med.pharmacy:36130

Dear all,
we would really apprecieate if there is someone that could give us
information about Progesterone and its metabolites. Since we are going to
do chromotographic separation, we are interested in physical data,
structure data and acid - base properties (pKa values). It would also be
very helpful to find a review aritcle in the area.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Nov 08 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!uknet!usenet2.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!agate!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!news1.ucsd.edu!usenet
From: Dmitry Beransky <dberansky@ucsd.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: PDB parsing [Q]
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 1996 14:21:44 -0800
Organization: UCSD
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <328503F4.BE0@ucsd.edu>
Reply-To: dberansky@ucsd.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: bio-york120.ucsd.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC)

Hello all,

I'm not sure if this is the right newsgroup to post such a message, but
it is the closest I could find.  

I need to write a program that among other things parses PDB files.  I'm
a programmer and I've never before dealt with PDB files.  I know that
there are currently two formats in which , PDB files can be found: v.1
and v.2.  My question is this:  is it possible to tell the difference
between the two formats programmatically?

If there is another place more suited to the nature of my question, do
let me know.

Thanks in advance


====================================================
Dmitry Beransky
University of California, San Diego
Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Multimedia Interactive Learning Laboratory (MILL)|Tel. 619/534-8560
Department of Biology, UC San Diego              |Fax 619/534-1835
Web:  http://millftp.ucsd.edu/

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Nov 08 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!news-stkh.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news-peer.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!uwm.edu!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!news.doit.wisc.edu!daemon
From: klenchin@facstaff.wisc.edu (Dima Klenchin)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Big Problems with Novagen´s HisTag Protein Purification
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 96 20:44:48 GMT
Organization: UW-Madison
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <562n1r$1s10@news.doit.wisc.edu>
References: <01bbce57$8fc130a0$09019386@Schmidt.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: f182-120.net.wisc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-No-Archive: Yes

In article <01bbce57$8fc130a0$09019386@Schmidt.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>, "Thorsten Schmidt" <Thorsten.Schmidt@rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote:
#Dear Sir or Madam!
#
#I have big Problems with Novagen`s HisTag Protein Purification-Kit.

#One should get 50-100 mg total protein after cell lysis and -after
#purification- 20 mg target protein from one 100 ml culture.

#I followed strikly Novagen´s purification protocol but the problems begin
#with the
#total protein. Instead of the predicted 50-100 mg, I get only 2 (!).

Did you have 0.5-1 mg/ml to start with? Not all proteins are expressed in 
soluble form to this level. 

#The second problem is the colomn chromatographie:
..
#How can I increase the column´s flow rate?

1) use "real" chromatography with peristaltic pump
2) connect tubing to the outlet of you gravity column; the lenth of tubing 
will control flow rate
3) [maybe] dilute you lysate 

- Dima

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Nov 08 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!feed1.news.erols.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!fu-berlin.de!news-ber1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!news.ruhr-uni-bochum.de!usenet
From: "Thorsten Schmidt" <Thorsten.Schmidt@rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Big Problems with Novagen´s HisTag Protein Purification
Date: 9 Nov 1996 16:03:40 GMT
Organization: Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum, Rechenzentrum
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <01bbce57$8fc130a0$09019386@Schmidt.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialppp-9.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1155

Dear Sir or Madam!

I have big Problems with Novagen`s HisTag Protein Purification-Kit.

I use the pET30-Vector which allows translation of my target protein
containing
6 His-residues. The target protein expression is inhibited during cell
growth and
induced by IPTG addition.
The 6 Histidines are used for protein-purification:
The Histidines bind to a "His bind resin" carrying Ni ions.
One should get 50-100 mg total protein after cell lysis and -after
purification- 20 mg target protein from one 100 ml culture.

But which differences between theory and my experience!!!

I followed strikly Novagen´s purification protocol but the problems begin
with the
total protein. Instead of the predicted 50-100 mg, I get only 2 (!).
But there might be no fault possible: One just harvests the cells by
centrifugation, resuspends the cells in a buffer (containing 5 mM imidazol,
0,5 M NaCl and 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7,9), sonicates and then removes debris by
ultra centrifugation (39.000 g).
Changes in the protocol (addition of Lysozyme, 0,1 % Triton) increases the
total protein amount only to 30 mg.
This leads to my first question:
What can I also do to increase the total protein yield?
May Lysozyme or Triton lead to problems with the HisTag purification?

The second problem is the colomn chromatographie:
According to the protocol I expect a flow rate of 25 ml/h.
But the real flow rate is just 10 ml/h. Filtration of the cell lysate or
new packing of
the column did not help.
Although SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the target protein is expressed, I
got no target protein (0,04 mg instead of 20 mg!). 

Have you made experiences with this purification kit?
Why is the total protein concentration so low?
How can I increase the column´s flow rate?
Why is it impossible to purify my target protein?
Can you help me?

Thank you for your answer!

yours sincerely

Thorsten Schmidt

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Nov 08 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!yama.mcc.ac.uk!viking.ucsalf.ac.uk!news.salford.ac.uk!aber!bath.ac.uk!dcl-cs!strath-cs!queens-belfast.ac.uk!queens-belfast.ac.uk!nntp
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Visiting Studentships at QUB
Message-ID: <327F090C.5C20@qub.ac.uk>
From: Andrew Wallace <a.wallace@qub.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 1996 09:29:48 +0000
Reply-To: a.wallace@queens-belfast.ac.uk
Organization: Queens University Belfast
Nntp-Posting-Host: awall.bc.qub.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 26

Three Visiting Studentships, tenable for two years initially with the 
possibility of renewal for a third year, are available for postgraduate 
research in the Colleges of Engineering, Health Sciences and Science 
& Agriculture. Their value is currently 6060 pounds Sterling per 
annum, plus exemption from enrolment and tuition fees of the 
University.

Applicants must have at least a 2.1 honours degree (or its equivalent) 
from a University other than Queens, and must have shown aptitude 
for research or other original work. Students who have not yet 
graduated and postgraduate students already registered for a doctorate 
at any University are ineligible to apply.

Application forms are available from the Academic Council Office, 
The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, Northern 
Ireland (UK). The closing date is 1st December 1996.

Email: joyce.thompson@qub.ac.uk
Fax:    +44-1232-313537
Tel:     +44-1232-245133 ext 3004/5/6

-- 
==================================================================
Andrew Wallace,Ph.D., Queen's University Belfast,  N. Ireland (UK)   
a.wallace@qub.ac.uk   http://web.qub.ac.uk/bb/awpage/wallace.html   
==================================================================

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Nov 08 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!btnet!netcom.net.uk!news.u-net.com!yama.mcc.ac.uk!viking.ucsalf.ac.uk!news.salford.ac.uk!aber!bath.ac.uk!dcl-cs!strath-cs!str-ccsun!intsvr1.bell.ac.uk!root
From: helen <student5@hamilton.bell.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Troponon I  - query
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 1996 21:09:26 +0000
Organization: a Digital Internet AlphaServer Site
Lines: 2
Message-ID: <327FAD06.509E@hamilton.bell.ac.uk>
Reply-To: student5@hamilton.bell.ac.uk
NNTP-Posting-Host: cscpc35.bell.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)

Does anyone know of a homology between animal and human structure for
Troponin I ?

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Nov 08 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!gatech!csulb.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!howland.erols.net!agate!nature.berkeley.edu!lhom
From: lhom@nature.berkeley.edu (Louis Hom)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Disulfides & organelles
Date: 10 Nov 1996 00:18:09 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <563701$3fq@agate.berkeley.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nature.berkeley.edu

So, as far as I know, the cytoplasm is a reducing environment, so that the
tendency is for cysteins to be found in the reduced state.  In contrast, the
extracellular environment favors disulfide formation (I hope I'm right so
far). 
	So my question is, is it generally true that you'd expect to see
disulfide formation in structures/organelles that are topologically
equivalent to the outside of the cell? 
 
-- 
_______________________________________________________________________________
Lou Hom >K '93		       	    	       "Into each life a little rain  
lhom@nature.berkeley.edu  		        must fall, even in San Diego." 
http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~lhom	       	      -- from "My Blue Heaven" 

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sat Nov 09 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!fnnews.fnal.gov!lakesis.fapesp.br!jazz.cr-df.rnp.br!news.dcc.ufmg.br!mono.icb.ufmg.br!waisberg
From: Michael Waisberg <waisberg@mono.icb.ufmg.br>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Ab against a receptor???
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 13:43:06 -0300
Organization: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.93.961107134105.3364E-100000@mono.icb.ufmg.br>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mono.icb.ufmg.br
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

I would like to produce ab's against one receptor in order to
analize it's properties but I don't have enough receptors to make the
immunization. I would like to know if there is a simple way to extract one
amount large enough to make this immunization or even if it is possible
to produce these ab' without extracting the receptor..
Thanks.

_________________________________________________________________________
Michael Waisberg
Adress:
R. Desemb. Alarico Barroso n 630
Bairro: Ouro Preto
BH/ MG
Brazil
Cep: 31310-380
Tel: (031)4981773
waisberg@mono.icb.ufmg.br


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sat Nov 09 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!netcom.net.uk!news.u-net.com!yama.mcc.ac.uk!liv!rgu.ac.uk!news
From: 933467u@app_science.rgu.ac.uk
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: EPOGEN and PROCRIT
Date: 5 Nov 1996 15:03:24 GMT
Organization: Computer Sevices Unit, The Robet Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <55nkvs$cgm@news.rgu.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: grays.rgu.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

To anyone who can help me,

I understand that EPOGEN is given to dialysis patents and PROCRIT is 
given to people suffering from cancer and HIV / AIDS.  Can anyone tell me 
if there's any difference between these drugs at the molecular level?

As they're given to different classes of patient, I assume that they're 
different drugs?  On the other hand it MIGHT be that due to some legal 
ruling, the manufacturers of the drugs (Amgen and Ortho Biotech) have 
been told to stick to seperate areas of the market. If this is the case, 
perhaps their products have different names simply to help people 
differentiate?  In effect, one drug has been given two names???

If no-one can answer these questions directly, I'd appreciate it if 
someone can advise me as to where I might find the information.

Thanks for your time folks,  Alan Mercer.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sat Nov 09 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!newsgate.duke.edu!news.duq.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!portc02.blue.aol.com!portc01.blue.aol.com!audrey01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: researchd@aol.com
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Troponon I  - query
Date: 10 Nov 1996 21:39:01 GMT
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) (1.10)
Lines: 4
Sender: news@aol.com
Message-ID: <19961110214100.QAA13212@ladder01.news.aol.com>
References: <327FAD06.509E@hamilton.bell.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder01.news.aol.com
X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader

See our antibodies to troponin and pure troponin standrad at
http://www.researchd.com

direct page access: http://www.researchd.com/troponin/troponin.htm

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 10 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!JASON.UTHCT.EDU!SHAUN
From: SHAUN@JASON.UTHCT.EDU ("Shaun D. Black")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Specificity of Endoproteinase Asp-N
Date: 11 Nov 1996 16:18:12 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 24
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <961111181714.725d@jason.uthct.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Howdy all,

      There are two ways to deal with cleavage at Cys residues, as best I
know:

      1. Modify with ethyleneimine.  This converts Cys into a derivative 
         that is isosteric with Lys, so trypsin will cleave such modified
         AE-Cys residues.

      2. Cyanylate Cys with Cyano-Thionitrobenzoate (CTNB).  Chemical
         peptide cleavage at the Cyano-Cys residues can be effected under
         alkaline conditions.

Methods in Enzymology has protocols for both of these procedures.  I hope
this helps a bit. 

Best regards,  Shaun

  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  = Shaun D. Black, PhD   | Internet address:     shaun@jason.uthct.edu   =
  = Dept. of Biochemistry | University of Texas Health Center, at Tyler   =
  = World Wide Web:    http://pegasus.uthct.edu/UTHCT-Home/Welcome.html   =
  = Network of Emerging Scientists: http://pegasus.uthct.edu/nes/nes.html =
  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 10 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!botany.uq.edu.au!J.Marcus
From: J.Marcus@botany.uq.edu.au ("Marcus, Dr J.")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Specificity of Endoproteinase Asp-N
Date: 11 Nov 1996 14:34:49 -0800
Organization: Dept of Botany, Univ of Qld
Lines: 36
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <D435371581E@botany.uq.edu.au>
Reply-To: Marcus@tpp.uq.edu.au
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Dear Kali,

You wrote:

> I am looking for something to specifically cleave at Cys residues.  I 
> am aware of Endoproteinase Asp-N which cleaves at Aspartic acid also. 
> Does anyone know of anything I could use? I am looking forward to your 
> great ideas.
> Thanks for the help, Kali
> 
If you are really desparate you might try modifying Cys 
residues with iodoacetamide.  Once modified, I think it 
allows trypsin to cleave at that position (maybe not 
efficiently but you should get some cleavage).  You would 
have to modify both arginines and lysines (see Pierce 
catalog) so that they are not susceptible to trypsin 
cleavage.  A bit of work, but if you are desparate, it 
might work.

Hope that helps.

John




_________________________________________________________
John Marcus            Marcus@tpp.uq.edu.au (Dr J.Marcus)
Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Plant Pathology
5th Level John Hines Building
University of Queensland
St. Lucia, QLD 4072
AUSTRALIA

Fax: 61-7-3365-4771
Phone: 61-7-3365-4764

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 10 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!vt.edu!kkniel
From: kkniel@vt.edu (Kali Phelps)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Specificity of Endoproteinase Asp-N
Date: 11 Nov 1996 13:06:57 -0800
Organization: student
Lines: 5
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <32879636.652B@vt.edu>
Reply-To: kkniel@vt.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

I am looking for something to specifically cleave at Cys residues.  I 
am aware of Endoproteinase Asp-N which cleaves at Aspartic acid also. 
Does anyone know of anything I could use? I am looking forward to your 
great ideas.
Thanks for the help, Kali

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 10 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!news.he.net!stc06.ctd.ornl.gov!fnnews.fnal.gov!cbgw1.lucent.com!cbgw3.lucent.com!news.pbi.net!samba.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!bug.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!in-news.erinet.com!news.izzy.net!aanews.merit.net!news.gmi.edu!msunews!NewsWatcher!user
From: 23144jda@msu.edu (Jenny Davila-Aponte)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Affinity chromatography
Followup-To: bionet.molbio.proteins
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 17:01:42 -0400
Organization: Michigan State University
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <23144jda-111196170142@35.8.197.48>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 35.8.197.48

I am trying to purify a fucosyltransferase that is involved in cell wall
synthesis in higher plants, and one of the steps of my purification
strategy is a GDP affinity column step.  This step gives me good
enrichment, but the recovery of activity is mediocre (15 - 20%).  Obtaining
tissue for protein extraction is laborious, so I would like to improve my
recovery of activity.  I have tried changing several ingredients of my
column buffer: buffer, pH, detergent, divalent cations, ionic strength, and
stabilizing agents; but have not been able to improve my recovery.  The
column buffer that I am currently using contains 20% glycerol, 50 mM pipes
KOH pH 6.2, 100 mM KCl, 0.1% decylmaltoside, aprotinin, caproic acid,
leupeptin, and pepstatin.  I would appreciate any advice or useful
suggestions

Amy DeRocher
deroche1@pilot.msu.edu

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 10 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!news.sgi.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!amgen!usenet
From: John Philo <jphilo@amgen.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Big Problems with =?iso-8859-1?Q?Novagen=B4s?= HisTag Protein 
	Purification
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 09:09:47 -0800
Organization: Amgen Inc.
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <32875DDB.3D50@amgen.com>
References: <01bbce57$8fc130a0$09019386@Schmidt.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Reply-To: jphilo@amgen.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
To: Thorsten Schmidt <Thorsten.Schmidt@rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>

Thorsten Schmidt wrote:
> =

> Dear Sir or Madam!
> =

> I have big Problems with Novagen`s HisTag Protein Purification-Kit.
> =

> (snip)
> =

> I followed strikly Novagen=B4s purification protocol but the problems b=
egin
> with the
> total protein. Instead of the predicted 50-100 mg, I get only 2 (!).
> (snip)
> Changes in the protocol (addition of Lysozyme, 0,1 % Triton) increases =
the
> total protein amount only to 30 mg.
> This leads to my first question:
> What can I also do to increase the total protein yield?

Expression levels of recombinant proteins can vary widely even when
using the same expression vector and system.  For example, proteins
whose N-terminal sequences contain several grouped proline residues
often express poorly.  Even for identical polypeptide sequences,
expression can vary depending on which of the redundant nucleotide
codons are used (many mammalian proteins do not express optimally in E.
coli because E. coli has different codon preferences). =


> May Lysozyme or Triton lead to problems with the HisTag purification?

Lysozyme shouldn't, and I doubt Triton will either, but I have no
personal experience with either.

> (snip)
> Although SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the target protein is expressed,=
 I
> got no target protein (0,04 mg instead of 20 mg!).
> (snip)
> Why is it impossible to purify my target protein?

While I have not done this myself, I know the experience of my Amgen
colleagues is that purification of His-tagged proteins on the Ni resin
fails fairly often, either because the protein hardly binds at all, or
because many other proteins are eluted along with the one of interest.

The view here is that His-tag purification of FOLDED proteins seldom
works, probably because the tag is sterically restrained from binding
well to the resin.  You may have better success if you explicitly run
your Ni column under conditions where the protein will be denatured
(perhaps adding urea or guanidine-HCl), but then you will have to refold
the protein in a separate step.  If you are hoping to purify a folded
protein using the Ni resin, you might want to try adding a spacer
sequence between your protein and the His tag so it is more exposed.

The view here is also that protein binding to the Ni resin is less
specific than one might wish.  It seems that often other proteins are
bound and elute with the tagged protein.  Presumably these other
proteins accidentally contain clusters of histidines.

'Hope this helps. Good luck.

John Philo, Protein Chemistry
Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
jphilo@amgen.com
*** Disclaimer: These are the opinions of the poster not Amgen Inc.***

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 10 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!gatech!csulb.edu!not-for-mail
From: cohlberg@csulb.edu (Jeff Cohlberg)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Disulfides & organelles
Date: 11 Nov 1996 17:14:25 GMT
Organization: Cal State Long Beach
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <567mth$m4e@hatathli.csulb.edu>
References: <563701$3fq@agate.berkeley.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gull.csulb.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]

Louis Hom (lhom@nature.berkeley.edu) wrote:
: 	So my question is, is it generally true that you'd expect to see
: disulfide formation in structures/organelles that are topologically
: equivalent to the outside of the cell? 

Yes.  For example, my understanding is that disulfide bonds are introduced
into secreted proteins by enzymes localized in the ER lumen, and the
oxidizing potential of the ER lumen and the various Golgi compartments
preserves the SS bond until the protein is secreted.  My uninformed guess
would be that lysosomal enzymes contain SS bonds to help preserve their
conformation in the extreme lysosomal environment.

Jeffrey A. Cohlberg, Professor
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
California State University, Long Beach
1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840
Phone: (310) 985-4944	FAX: (310) 985-8557   E-mail: cohlberg@csulb.edu

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 10 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!feed1.news.erols.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!amgen!usenet
From: John Philo <jphilo@amgen.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: EPOGEN and PROCRIT
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 08:46:51 -0800
Organization: Amgen Inc.
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <3287587B.764A@amgen.com>
References: <55nkvs$cgm@news.rgu.ac.uk>
Reply-To: jphilo@amgen.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
To: 933467u@app_science.rgu.ac.uk

933467u@app_science.rgu.ac.uk wrote:
>
> I understand that EPOGEN is given to dialysis patents and PROCRIT is
> given to people suffering from cancer and HIV / AIDS.  Can anyone tell me
> if there's any difference between these drugs at the molecular level?
> 
> As they're given to different classes of patient, I assume that they're
> different drugs?  On the other hand it MIGHT be that due to some legal
> ruling, the manufacturers of the drugs (Amgen and Ortho Biotech) have
> been told to stick to seperate areas of the market. If this is the case,
> perhaps their products have different names simply to help people
> differentiate?  In effect, one drug has been given two names???

EPOGEN and PROCRIT are identical at the molecular level. Ortho provided
financial support to Amgen for the development of erythropoietin as a
therapeutic. In return, they obtained licensing rights to market the
drug for all indications in the U.S. other than kidney dialysis.  

In fact, fairly often hospital pharmacies only carry one of these two
products, so PROCRIT can end up being used in dialysis patients or
EPOGEN in AIDS patients.  The two companies have a agreement on how to
compensate each other for such "out of market" sales.

John Philo, Protein Chemistry
Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
jphilo@amgen.com
*** Disclaimer: These are the opinions of the poster not Amgen Inc.***

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 10 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!feed1.news.erols.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!amgen!usenet
From: John Philo <jphilo@amgen.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Cost of Epogen Production / Treatment.
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 08:38:20 -0800
Organization: Amgen Inc.
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <3287567C.36DF@amgen.com>
References: <55doee$smj@news.rgu.ac.uk>
Reply-To: jphilo@amgen.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
To: 933467u@app_science.rgu.ac.uk

933467u@app_science.rgu.ac.uk wrote:
> 
> To anyone who can help me,
> 
> I'm a forth year student at the Robert Gordon Universtiy in Aberdeen,
> Scotland.  I'm desperately seeking information on some of the economic
> implications of synthetically produced Erythropoietin (AKA EPO, Epogen,
> etc.).  Can anyone tell me how much it would cost to produce say, 100ml
> of the stuff?  How much would it cost to treat a patient with EPO for a
> month?
> 
> If no-one can answer my questions directly,  I'd appreciate it if someone
> could suggest where I might find the information I need.
> 
> Thanks for your time folks,  Alan Mercer.

You should be able to get information about the costs of EPO treatment
from the Amgen sales and marketing people.  We have an office in
Cambridge, UK, tel. 011 44 1223 420305. You would probably also be able
to get such information from organizations providing support for kidney
disease patients.

You should probably look at the info available about EPO on the Amgen
web site, www.amgen.com.  The specific link to a page about EPO is 
http://www.Amgen.com/cgi-bin/genobject/productEpogen/tigxbJPgVC9

This page leads to background info about EPO and its actions, physician
prescription info, and information about our Patient Assistance Program
for those who cannot afford to pay for EPO treatment, and pointers to
various kidney disease organizations.

EPO, a protein hormone, is not measured in milliliters.  Internally we
measure it in micrograms, but for prescription purposes it is measured
in activity units, based on an international standard.  I believe those
international units are based on formation of red blood cell precursors
in an in vitro bone marrow assay, but I am not sure about that.

John Philo, Protein Chemistry
Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
jphilo@amgen.com
*** Disclaimer: These are the opinions of the poster not Amgen Inc.***

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 10 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!CENTRAL.MURDOCH.EDU.AU!ppanutat
From: ppanutat@CENTRAL.MURDOCH.EDU.AU (Panomporn Panutat)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Ni column problem
Date: 11 Nov 1996 02:25:18 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 7
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.90.961111182352.17638A-100000@central.murdoch.edu.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

I have a problem with eluting protein from Ni-column (QIAGEN) . I 
followed spin column protocol described by the manufacturers but the 
protein remains bound to the column. Does anyone have any suggestions as 
to how I can elute my protein without denaturing it.
Any suggestions greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Panomporn

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 10 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!news.he.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!mr.net!news.mid.net!nntp.ksu.edu!news.physics.uiowa.edu!news.uiowa.edu!phloem.biology.uiowa.edu!user
From: r-sjolund@uiowa.edu (Richard Sjolund)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Postdoc in Plant Cell and Mol. Biology
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 12:38:41 -0500
Organization: Univ. of Iowa
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <r-sjolund-1111961238410001@phloem.biology.uiowa.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: phloem.biology.uiowa.edu

A Postdoctoral position is available immediately to conduct research on
phloem sieve elements in plant tissue cultures using biochemical,
cellular, and molecular techniques. 

(See Wang, Monroe and Sjolund, 1995, Plant Physiology, 109:743-750.)
 
Applicants must have a Ph.D. in a plant science, and direct experience in
plant molecular biology and plant biochemistry.  Experience in
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, western blotting techniques, and
protein purification is desirable.   Please send a letter describing your
research and training, a C.V., and three letters of recommendation to:

Dr. Richard Sjolund
Department of Biological Sciences
Room 222 Chemistry Bld.
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa  USA 52242. 
Fax: 319: 335 3620.  Email: r-sjolund@uiowa.edu
 
The University of Iowa is an equal opportunity employer.  
Women and minority candidates are encouraged to apply.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 10 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!news.good.net!news.good.net!news.he.net!night.primate.wisc.edu!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!news.doit.wisc.edu!martinlab
From: klenchin@facstaff.wisc.edu (Dima Klenchin)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Affinity chromatography
Date: 11 Nov 1996 23:51:06 GMT
Organization: UW-Madison
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <568e5a$13mk@news.doit.wisc.edu>
References: <23144jda-111196170142@35.8.197.48>
NNTP-Posting-Host: martinlab.biochem.wisc.edu
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
X-No-Archive: Yes

In article <23144jda-111196170142@35.8.197.48>,
   23144jda@msu.edu (Jenny Davila-Aponte) wrote:
->I am trying to purify a fucosyltransferase that is involved in cell wall
->synthesis in higher plants, and one of the steps of my purification
->strategy is a GDP affinity column step.  This step gives me good
->enrichment, but the recovery of activity is mediocre (15 - 20%).  
Obtaining
->tissue for protein extraction is laborious, so I would like to improve 
my
->recovery of activity.  I have tried changing several ingredients of my
->column buffer: buffer, pH, detergent, divalent cations, ionic strength, 
and
->stabilizing agents; but have not been able to improve my recovery.  The
->column buffer that I am currently using contains 20% glycerol, 50 mM 
pipes
->KOH pH 6.2, 100 mM KCl, 0.1% decylmaltoside, aprotinin, caproic acid,
->leupeptin, and pepstatin.  I would appreciate any advice or useful
->suggestions

Many possibilities:

1. Another factor stimulates activity. Try adding flow-through back
to eluted fractions and see if activity is any different. 

2. What is eluent? Affinity (GDP*Mg)? Try higher concentrations and/or
longer elution times - when the affinity for GDP is high, k(off) is 
frequently rate-limiting step. In this case filling the column with 
eluent, stopping the flow for 30-60 min, then eluting helps. 

3. You have an inherently labile protein. Not much can be done here.
Live with it and hope that one day you hit some magic trick that will
stabilize activity. As a matter of fact, I envy you. I've not been able
to push recovery of "my" protein above 5%. 

Good luck, 

- Dima



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 10 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!gatech!csulb.edu!newshub.csu.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!news.fsu.edu!fn3.freenet.tlh.fl.us!usenet
From: "mehboob b.sheikh" <saleem5@freenet3.scri.fsu.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.jobs,bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.plants
Subject: Post-doc/visiting scientist position available
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 17:45:29 -0500
Organization: FAMU
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <3287AC88.5231@freenet3.scri.fsu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fts4p8-bfs.scri.fsu.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.proteins:9246 bionet.molbio.rapd:1710 bionet.plants:13225

POSITION ANNOUNCEMENT
	

Research Associate - Molecular Biology. Two postdoctoral positions are
available to work on peanut molecular biology.  The successful
candidates will conduct research on the molecular biology of drought and
disease resistance, and improving protein quality of peanut.  Major
goals will include identifying molecular markers for disease  and
drought resistance, cloning methionine-rich protein gene, and
transformation of peanut.  The appointee will be expected to have
demonstrated experience in modern molecular biology techniques, which
may include mRNA isolation and in vitro translation, southern and
northern hybridization, RT-PCR, gene cloning/vector  construction,
screening  cDNA library  using polyclonal antibodies, DNA sequencing and
related techniques, to detect, describe and manage the behavior of the
genes.  The laboratory is fully equipped with necessary instrumentation
and supplies for the above research.  A Ph.D. in plant science with
extensive knowledge and experience in plant molecular biology is
required. Applicants must submit a letter of application describing
research and career interests and experience, resume, transcripts and
three references to Dr. Mehboob B. Sheikh, Plant Biotechnology Program,
Division of Agricultural Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee,
Florida 32307-4100.  Phone: (904) 561-2218; E-Mail: Sheikh1@juno.com.
Florida A&M University is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action
Employer.  Minority candidates and women are encouraged to apply.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Nov 10 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!botany.uq.edu.au!J.Marcus
From: J.Marcus@botany.uq.edu.au ("Marcus, Dr J.")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Specificity of Endoprot
Date: 11 Nov 1996 20:30:41 -0800
Organization: Dept of Botany, Univ of Qld
Lines: 54
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <D4944A87E8A@botany.uq.edu.au>
Reply-To: Marcus@tpp.uq.edu.au
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Dear netters:

In an earlier post I suggested using Iodoacetamide to 
modify Cys residues to make them susceptible to Trypsin 
cleavage.  I was quite mistaken, as Daniel Milligan kindly pointed out 
to me.  Shaun Black's suggestion to use the ethyleneimine is the 
suggestion that I should have made.  Sorry if I caused any 
confusion.  

Regards,
John

> 
> --------------------------------------
> Date: 11/11/96 4:13 PM
> To: protein-analysis@net.bio.net
> From: Marcus@tpp.uq.edu.au
> Dear Kali,
> 
> You wrote:
> 
> > I am looking for something to specifically cleave at Cys residues.  I 
> > am aware of Endoproteinase Asp-N which cleaves at Aspartic acid also. 
> > Does anyone know of anything I could use? I am looking forward to your 
> > great ideas.
> > Thanks for the help, Kali
> > 
> If you are really desparate you might try modifying Cys 
> residues with iodoacetamide.  Once modified, I think it 
> allows trypsin to cleave at that position (maybe not 
> efficiently but you should get some cleavage).  You would 
> have to modify both arginines and lysines (see Pierce 
> catalog) so that they are not susceptible to trypsin 
> cleavage.  A bit of work, but if you are desparate, it 
> might work.
> 
> Hope that helps.
> 
> John
> 




_________________________________________________________
John Marcus            Marcus@tpp.uq.edu.au (Dr J.Marcus)
Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Plant Pathology
5th Level John Hines Building
University of Queensland
St. Lucia, QLD 4072
AUSTRALIA

Fax: 61-7-3365-4771
Phone: 61-7-3365-4764

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!NMSU.EDU!hroychow
From: hroychow@NMSU.EDU (Hiranya Roychowdhury)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: small volume dialysis
Date: 12 Nov 1996 14:41:50 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 21
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199611122241.PAA10831@NMSU.Edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

At 09:22 AM 11/12/96 -0800, kewugator@UFCC.UFL.EDU wrote:
>Hi, there:
>I am going to dialysis some proteins (30 KDa) in very small volume (20 ul).
>Any body has any idea that how can I have a good recovery of the proteins and 
>what kind of dialysis apparatus can be used to get the maximum recovery of the 
>proteins.
>Thanks.
>
>						Ke Wu
>
>

Try microdialysis using VSWP membrane filters from Milipore. 

Dr. Hiranya Sankar Roychowdhury
Plant Genetic Engineering Lab.
New Mexico State University
Las Cruces, NM 88003
Ph. (505) 646-5785
hroychow@nmsu.edu


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.bc.net!torn!resunix.sickkids.on.ca!NewsWatcher!user
From: michael.didonato@utoronto.ca (Michael DiDonato)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: small volume dialysis
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 15:19:06 -0500
Organization: The Hospital for Sick Children
Lines: 19
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <michael.didonato-1211961519060001@142.20.36.38>
References: <009AB424.1AC6CEA0.10@UFCC.UFL.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 142.20.36.38

In article <009AB424.1AC6CEA0.10@UFCC.UFL.EDU>, kewugator@UFCC.UFL.EDU wrote:

> Hi, there:
> I am going to dialysis some proteins (30 KDa) in very small volume (20 ul).
> Any body has any idea that how can I have a good recovery of the proteins and 
> what kind of dialysis apparatus can be used to get the maximum recovery
of the 
> proteins.
> Thanks.
> 
>                                                 Ke Wu

Dialysis buttons would be the best in this case I think.  You can get them
in a range of sizes from
5 micro liters to ~500 micro liters I think.  Unfortunately I don't know
who supplies them.

Good Luck..
Mike

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov!cpk-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!mr.net!news.mid.net!nntp.ksu.edu!news.cis.okstate.edu!usenet
From: Ron Tate <rtate@bmb-fs1.biochem.okstate.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: small volume dialysis
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 14:33:15 -0600
Organization: Oklahoma State University, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <3288DF0A.524C@bmb-fs1.biochem.okstate.edu>
References: <009AB424.1AC6CEA0.10@UFCC.UFL.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: firefly3.biochem.okstate.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)

kewugator@UFCC.UFL.EDU wrote:
> 
> Hi, there:
> I am going to dialysis some proteins (30 KDa) in very small volume (20 ul).
> Any body has any idea that how can I have a good recovery of the proteins and
> what kind of dialysis apparatus can be used to get the maximum recovery of the
> proteins.
> Thanks.
> 
>                                                 Ke Wu

I posted this suggestion a month or so ago also, BioTechniques published
a way to do this last year, Vol. 19, No.2 (1995) (I don't have the page
number) the article was titled "Waterbug Dialysis".  It involved cutting
the top portion off of a microfuge tube and closing a piece of dialysis
membrane in the lid with your sample inside the lid and then floating
the thing in a beaker of buffer.  Its one of those "Why didn't I think
of that" kind of ideas.  
If you don't have access to back issues of BioTechniques they are online
with their back issues and a searchable d-base.
Happy Hunting
-- 
>>>>>>--------------------------->
Ron
Tate                                                                   
Lab of Franklin Leach
Dept. of Biochem. & Molecular Biology
Oklahoma State University 
rtate@bmb-fs1.biochem.okstate.edu
(405) 744-9326
---------------------------------------------

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.enteract.com!news.inetnebr.com!netserv.unmc.edu!netserv!gspahwa
From: gspahwa@netserv.unmc.edu (Gurcharan Pahwa)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Secretory protein
Date: 12 Nov 1996 21:16:24 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska Medical Center
Lines: 1
Message-ID: <56apf8$s0d1@netserv.unmc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.197.98.10
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!UFCC.UFL.EDU!kewugator
From: kewugator@UFCC.UFL.EDU
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: small volume dialysis
Date: 12 Nov 1996 09:22:05 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 8
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <009AB424.1AC6CEA0.10@UFCC.UFL.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hi, there:
I am going to dialysis some proteins (30 KDa) in very small volume (20 ul).
Any body has any idea that how can I have a good recovery of the proteins and 
what kind of dialysis apparatus can be used to get the maximum recovery of the 
proteins.
Thanks.

						Ke Wu

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!daresbury!bioftp.unibas.ch!infobiogen.fr!pasteur.fr!oleane!in2p3.fr!swidir.switch.ch!swsbe6.switch.ch!scsing.switch.ch!elna.ethz.ch!bclutz2.ethz.ch!user
From: hornig@bc.biol.ethz.ch (Ruediger Hornig)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Specificity of Endoproteinase Asp-N
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 16:54:04 +0100
Organization: ETH Zurich
Lines: 29
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <hornig-1211961654040001@bclutz2.ethz.ch>
References: <32879636.652B@vt.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bclutz2.ethz.ch

In article <32879636.652B@vt.edu>, kkniel@vt.edu wrote:

> I am looking for something to specifically cleave at Cys residues.  I 
> am aware of Endoproteinase Asp-N which cleaves at Aspartic acid also. 
> Does anyone know of anything I could use? I am looking forward to your 
> great ideas.
> Thanks for the help, Kali

Dear Kali

A chemical way of cleaving a protein before C is cutting with NTCB. The
procedure requires complete denaturation in SDS and reduction of all
sulfhydryl side chains with DTT. Contrary to Asp-N and the proposed
Iodoacetamide extension of C, it's pretty easy and specific.

Hope this helps

Ruedi

----------------------------------------------------------------------
    _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/    _/    ETH Zurich
   _/        _/    _/    _/    Biochemie II
  _/_/_/    _/    _/_/_/_/    Rüdiger Hornig (hornig@bc.biol.ethz.ch)
 _/        _/    _/    _/    Universitaetstr. 16, ETH Zentrum
_/_/_/_/  _/    _/    _/    CH-8092 Zurich (Switzerland)
                           Phone: +41 1 632 3007  FAX: +41 1 632 12 69

         http://www.bc.biol.ethz.ch/BiochemistryII/BioII.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!EMPIRE.NET!wepayne
From: wepayne@EMPIRE.NET (William E. Payne)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: subscribe
Date: 12 Nov 1996 06:17:35 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 12
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <v02140b00aeadf0df6528@[205.164.80.133]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

subscribe protein-analysis William E. Payne

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
William E. Payne
40A Wheeler Road
Pepperell, MA  01463
(508) 433-8940  Phone
(508) 433-2971  Fax
wepayne@empire.net
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!math.ohio-state.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!nntp.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!casaba.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!fas-news.harvard.edu!husc7.harvard.edu!mlevin
From: mlevin@husc7.harvard.edu (Michael Levin)
Newsgroups: bionet.cellbiol,bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: need a protocol to do a Western blot for membrane protein from Xenopus
Date: 12 Nov 1996 13:12:12 GMT
Organization: Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 14
Distribution: usa
Message-ID: <569t3c$10r@decaxp.harvard.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: husc7.harvard.edu
Xref: biosci bionet.cellbiol:5930 bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:51411 bionet.molbio.proteins:9251


    This is probably a pretty easy question, but I need a protocol for
isolating protein (making sure I get membrane proteins) from Xenopus
and probing it with an antibody (whether on a gel or just on some kind
of "spot blot").  While I know the overall idea of how to do it, I
haven't worked with proteins before, so I really need a detailed
protocol, which spells out exactly what to do - which solutions (and
how to make 'em), for how long, etc. If you have such a protocol (in
your lab's computer, for example), or know where I can get one, please
email me at mlevin@husc.harvard.edu - I would greatly appreciate
it. Thanks in advance,

Mike Levin


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!agate!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!newsfeed.dacom.co.kr!arclight.uoregon.edu!nntp.primenet.com!nntp.uio.no!nntp.zit.th-darmstadt.de!fu-berlin.de!informatik.tu-muenchen.de!lrz-muenchen.de!news
From: Boris Steipe <steipe@LMB.uni-muenchen.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Ni column problem
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 11:34:09 +0000
Organization: Genzentrum
Lines: 28
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <32886033.4F59@LMB.uni-muenchen.de>
References: <Pine.OSF.3.90.961111182352.17638A-100000@central.murdoch.edu.au>
Reply-To: steipe@LMB.uni-muenchen.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: bs_boris.lmb.uni-muenchen.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Macintosh; I; PPC)

Panomporn Panutat wrote:
> 
> I have a problem with eluting protein from Ni-column (QIAGEN) . I
> followed spin column protocol described by the manufacturers but the
> protein remains bound to the column. Does anyone have any suggestions as
> to how I can elute my protein without denaturing it.

Any of the following should elute protein, that is specifically bound:

Imidazole: washing with 300 mM should elute everything
pH: protonated Histidines will not bind, pH below 6.0 will elute.
EDTA: will wash down complexed Ni - try 5mM.

BUT: if you have followed the instructions, most likely your protein is
denatured and/or nonspecifically bound to the column. Then none of the
above is likely to work. Try 8M Urea (7M if you work in the coldroom), 1
M NaCl, 10 mM EDTA. This also will clean your column between runs.

Good luck,
Boris


-- 
     +---Dr. Boris Steipe------------<steipe@LMB.uni-muenchen.de>---+
     |   Genzentrum                                                 |
     |   Feodor-Lynen Str. 25            Tel +49 (0)89 74017-417    |
     |   81377 Muenchen, Germany         Fax               - 448    |
     +---<http://www.LMB.uni-muenchen.de/users/steipe/boris.html>---+

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.pitt.edu!mv29.pathology.pitt.edu!user
From: pxpst2@vms.cis.pitt.edu (THE GREEK)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Coagulation proteins
Date: 12 Nov 1996 20:18:03 GMT
Organization: USA
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <pxpst2-1311961523370001@mv29.pathology.pitt.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mv29.pathology.pitt.edu

Any body out there with experience with the coagulation proteins?  I am
most interested in factor Xa and its reaction requirements. 
Peter Pediaditakis pxpst2@vms.cis.pitt.edu

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!CSHL.ORG!leemor
From: leemor@CSHL.ORG (Leemor Joshua-Tor)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: small volume dialysis
Date: 12 Nov 1996 15:09:17 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 60
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <v01530504aeae6cb20809@[143.48.60.60]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

>In article <009AB424.1AC6CEA0.10@UFCC.UFL.EDU>, kewugator@UFCC.UFL.EDU wrote:
>
>> Hi, there:
>> I am going to dialysis some proteins (30 KDa) in very small volume (20 ul).
>> Any body has any idea that how can I have a good recovery of the
>>proteins and
>> what kind of dialysis apparatus can be used to get the maximum recovery
>of the
>> proteins.
>> Thanks.
>>
>>                                                 Ke Wu
>
>Dialysis buttons would be the best in this case I think.  You can get them
>in a range of sizes from
>5 micro liters to ~500 micro liters I think.  Unfortunately I don't know
>who supplies them.
>
>Good Luck..
>Mike

   You can find the buttons through Hampton Research. They normally sell
stuff for crystallization but they sell these dialysis buttons.
Check out their home page: http://www.hamptonresearch.com

However, Ron Tate wrote:

>I posted this suggestion a month or so ago also, BioTechniques published
>a way to do this last year, Vol. 19, No.2 (1995) (I don't have the page
>number) the article was titled "Waterbug Dialysis".  It involved cutting
>the top portion off of a microfuge tube and closing a piece of dialysis
>membrane in the lid with your sample inside the lid and then floating
>the thing in a beaker of buffer.  Its one of those "Why didn't I think
>of that" kind of ideas.
>If you don't have access to back issues of BioTechniques they are online
>with their back issues and a searchable d-base.
>Happy Hunting
>--
>>>>>>--------------------------->
>Ron
>Tate

We use this method often for very small volumes and it works well.
Another way of making the hole in the tube cap is by using a hot
glass rod, the hole is less sharp and less likely to puncture your
dialysis membrane.

                                        good luck,
                                            Leemor


*******************************************************************
  Leemor Joshua-Tor, Ph.D.
  Assistant Investigator
  Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory           Tel. (516) 367 8821
  1 Bungtown Road                         Fax  (516) 367 8873
  Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724            e-mail: leemor@cshl.org
*******************************************************************



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.enteract.com!news.inetnebr.com!netserv.unmc.edu!netserv!gspahwa
From: gspahwa@netserv.unmc.edu (Gurcharan Pahwa)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Secretory protein
Date: 12 Nov 1996 22:49:52 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska Medical Center
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <56auug$s0d3@netserv.unmc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.197.98.10
Keywords: proteins,o-glycosylation
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

I intend to study the O-linked glycosylation of a polypeptide in
cells. For that matter I intend to use a custom designed oligonucleotide
for its stable expression in mammalian cell cultures. I need an eukaryotic
expression vector with features such as a strong promotor (SV40 etc), a
selection marker, signal peptide for secretary proteins, polypeptide
sequence for processing in the golgi.I will need complete restriction map
to design my oilgo. I shall greatly admire to have such an expression
vector so that we are able to insert our oligonucleotide  for expression
of the corresponding protein and further secretion into the medium.
I look forward to your valuable advice. Thanks
 
Jaswant.
 


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.enteract.com!news.inetnebr.com!netserv.unmc.edu!netserv!gspahwa
From: gspahwa@netserv.unmc.edu (Gurcharan Pahwa)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Secretory protein
Date: 12 Nov 1996 22:52:27 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska Medical Center
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <56av3b$s0d4@netserv.unmc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.197.98.10
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

I intend to study the O-linked glycosylation of a polypeptide in
cells. For that matter I intend to use a custom designed oligonucleotide
for its stable expression in mammalian cell cultures. I need an eukaryotic
expression vector with features such as a strong promotor (SV40 etc), a
selection marker, signal peptide for secretary proteins, polypeptide
sequence for processing in the golgi.I will need complete restriction map
to design my oilgo. I shall greatly admire to have such an expression
vector so that we are able to insert our oligonucleotide  for expression
of the corresponding protein and further secretion into the medium.
I look forward to your valuable advice. Thanks
 
Jaswant.
 

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!mr.net!news.mid.net!netserv.unmc.edu!netserv!jsingh
From: jsingh@netserv.unmc.edu (Jaswant Singh)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: test
Date: 12 Nov 1996 22:24:20 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska Medical Center
Lines: 2
Message-ID: <56atek$s0d2@netserv.unmc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.197.98.10
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

test,please ignore


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!nntp.uio.no!nntp.zit.th-darmstadt.de!news.th-darmstadt.de!odb!photon.ON-Luebeck.DE!msms
From: Manfred Schuermann <msms@ON-Luebeck.DE>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: orosomucoid genotyping
Date: 13 Nov 1996 05:40:35 GMT
Organization: Offenes Netz Luebeck e.V.
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <56bn0j$3hf@photon.ON-Luebeck.DE>
NNTP-Posting-Host: on.on-luebeck.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 unoff BETA release 961005]

Orosomucoid (ORM) 

                   is a highly polymorphic protein.  Genotyping 
is usually done by isoelectric focusing. I would like to know, 
if there is a  *DNA / PCR based*  method to demonstrate ORM alleles.
(The Genome Data Base -GDB- does not list ORM variants)


Thank you very much for helpful hints!


Manfred Schuermann, M.D.

           Institute of Human Genetics
           University of Luebeck Medical School, Germany  
   
                e-mail   msms@on-luebeck.de
                phone    +49 451 500 2620
                fax      +49 451 500 4187



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!nntp.uio.no!nntp.zit.th-darmstadt.de!news.th-darmstadt.de!odb!photon.ON-Luebeck.DE!msms
From: Manfred Schuermann <msms@ON-Luebeck.DE>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: haptoglobin genotyping
Date: 13 Nov 1996 05:39:41 GMT
Organization: Offenes Netz Luebeck e.V.
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <56bmut$3hf@photon.ON-Luebeck.DE>
NNTP-Posting-Host: on.on-luebeck.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 unoff BETA release 961005]

Haptoglobin (HP)

		   is a highly polymorphic protein.  Genotyping 
is usually done by isoelectric focusing. I would like to know, 
if there is a  * PCR based*  method to demonstrate HP alleles.
It should be possible as the underlying DNA variations are known.
(The Genome Data Base -GDB- lists HP variants that are detected 
by Southern blotting and HP probe hybridization )


Thank you very much for helpful hints!


Manfred Schuermann, M.D.

	   Institute of Human Genetics
	   University of Luebeck Medical School, Germany  
   
		e-mail   msms@on-luebeck.de
		phone    +49 451 500 2620
		fax      +49 451 500 4187




From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!news.sgi.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!feed1.news.erols.com!panix!news.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: iayork@panix.com (Ian A. York)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: small volume dialysis
Date: 12 Nov 1996 19:07:11 -0500
Organization: Panix
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <56b3ff$1jr@panix.com>
References: <009AB424.1AC6CEA0.10@UFCC.UFL.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix.com

In article <009AB424.1AC6CEA0.10@UFCC.UFL.EDU>,
 <kewugator@UFCC.UFL.EDU> wrote:
>
>I am going to dialysis some proteins (30 KDa) in very small volume (20 ul).

You might try floating dialysis.  Float a small piece of filter paper on
water (or whatever you're dialyzing into), and gently pipette the sample
on top of the filter.  After you're done, gently pipette it off again.  If
your hands aren't shaky it's very easy.

I don't know what filter would be the best - check with MilliPore for the
appropriate one.

Ian
-- 
      Ian York   (iayork@panix.com)  <http://www.panix.com/~iayork/>
      "-but as he was a York, I am rather inclined to suppose him a
       very respectable Man." -Jane Austen, The History of England

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!news.he.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!EU.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!uunet!in3.uu.net!news.u.washington.edu!saul1.u.washington.edu!egn
From: "E. Kolker" <egn@u.washington.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.general,bionet.info-theory,bionet.molbio.proteins,sci.med.pharmacy
Subject: Abstract
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 15:58:30 -0800
Organization: University of Washington
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95.961112155748.5817C-100000@saul1.u.washington.edu>
References: <01bbcd7b$e9d3bd60$3024ef82@pepsi>
NNTP-Posting-Host: saul1.u.washington.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
NNTP-Posting-User: egn
In-Reply-To: <01bbcd7b$e9d3bd60$3024ef82@pepsi>
Xref: biosci bionet.general:23997 bionet.info-theory:4377 bionet.molbio.proteins:9265 sci.med.pharmacy:36407


                        ANNOUNCEMENT AND CALL FOR PAPERS

	                Computational Biology Session:
 	                 "Computing in the Genome Era"

         Eleventh International Conference on Mathematical and Computer
                       Modelling and Scientific Computing

                            March 31 - April 3, 1997
                    Georgetown University Conference Center
                              Washington, DC, USA 


     The Eleventh International Conference on Mathematical and Computer
Modelling and Scientific Computing is scheduled to take place March 31 - 
April 3, 1997 at the Georgetown University Conference Center, Washington, 
DC, U.S.A. Plenary lectures by world-renowned scientists and sessions on 
many recent developments in engineering and sciences comprise a 
long-standing tradition at the ICMCM's. Mathematical and computer modelling
and scientific computing have become powerful tools for solving complex
problems and providing greater insights into the future. The objective of
the conference is to bring together researchers from various disciplines
including the traditional and emerging areas of engineering and sciences 
for cross-fertilization of ideas and exchange of information. 

     The objective of the Computational Biology Session "Computing in the 
Genome Era" is to discuss the current state of computational biology, its 
approaches, methods, general problems, achievements, and future developments 
with emphasis on sequence research and analysis for the Genome Projects. 
Speakers of the session include: 

S. Altschul (NCBI, NIH, Bethesda), A. Bairoch (Geneva Univ., Switzerland), 
W. Gish (Wash. Univ., St. Louis), P. Green (Univ. of Wash., Seattle), 
S. Henikoff (FHCRC, HHMC, Seattle), L. Hood (Univ. of Wash., Seattle), 
E. Koonin (NCBI, NIH, Bethesda), D. Searls (SmithKline Beecham, King of 
Prussia), E. Trifonov (Weizmann Inst., Israel).
 
     Papers (Abstracts) are invited on all relevant aspects of computational 
biology for presentation at the session, to be selected on competitive basis 
by a steering committee. One-page abstracts (about 200 words) should clearly 
describe the work and its conclusions. Full length manuscripts (limited to 
six pages) of papers presented at the conference will be published in the 
Conference Proceedings, in a special issue of the journal MATHEMATICAL 
MODELLING AND SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, Vol. 8, 1997 (ISSN 1067-0688). The 
manuscripts for the special issue are due June 15, 1997. The special issue 
of the journal will be published by September 1997. All participants shall 
pay the registration fee (pre-registration before February 15, 1997: IAMCM 
or IMACS members - $330, non-members - $375, graduate students - $210, 
undergraduate students - $175). 

     Abstracts may be submitted in hard copy or via fax or by e-mail 
(preferred!) under subject "Abstract". The abstracts must be formatted to 
fit on 8-1/2 x 11 inch (approximately 21.5 cm x 28 cm or European Standard 
A-4 size) paper, typed in single space. The title must be capitalized and 
centered followed by the author's name(s), institution, and full address, 
including fax and e-mail. Send two copies (ONE copy if sent by fax or 
e-mail) of the abstract to the session organizer BEFORE November 30, 1996: 

Eugene Kolker                                         
Dept of Molecular Biotechnology and Genome Center     
Box 357730, University of Washington                  
Seattle, WA 98195-7730, USA           

Fax: +1-206-685-7301
E-mail: egn@u.washington.edu

 
     Important dates:
     Closing date for receiving abstracts:  November 30, 1996
     Notification of acceptance: December 27, 1996

     The Computational Biology Session is sponsored by SILICON GRAPHICS.
Companies are welcome to participate in the session, present their tools
and products, and/or co-sponsor the session. The Web site for the session 
is under contruction and will include information on the session, a list of 
related sites, links to the sponsors etc.





From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Nov 11 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.uoregon.edu!waikato!auckland.ac.nz!news
From: mmm_klehnert@mednov1.auckland.ac.nz (Klaus Lehnert)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: small volume dialysis
Date: 12 Nov 1996 20:59:28 GMT
Organization: University of Auckland
Lines: 32
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <56aofg$80k@scream.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <009AB424.1AC6CEA0.10@UFCC.UFL.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mmm-55-82.mmm.auckland.ac.nz
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.11

In article ,  says...
>
>Hi, there:
>I am going to dialysis some proteins (30 KDa) in very small 
volume (20 ul).

Hi Ke Wu,
it doesn't get any cheaper and easier than that:
Take an eppendorf tube (0.5-1.5ml)
punch a hole in the lid
fill your sample
take a coin-sized piece of dialysis tubing (one layer)
put on top of tube
close lid, thereby squeezing the dialysis membrane
(opt: seal the rim of lid/tube with small strip of parafilm; 
necessary only foe low-quality tubes).
put tube into floater
put upside-down into dialysis buffer
make sure there is no air bubble trapped in the punched-out 
hole.
invert from time to time to make sure all your protein comes 
into contact with the membrane.
After dialysis, simply spin tube, this gets you all liquid to 
the bottom. 

Works always well for me, no significant loss, very little 
increase in volume

Have fun

KLAUS


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Nov 12 22:00:00 1996
Path: biosci!internet!biosci!not-for-mail
From: biohelp (BIOSCI Administrator)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: BIOSCI/bionet miniFAQ & Fundraiser
Date: 13 Nov 1996 02:00:44 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 239
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199611131000.CAA22592@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

(LAST REVISION: 30-JUL-95)

This BIOSCI "miniFAQ" is designed to answer the questions that come up
the *most frequently*.  The main BIOSCI FAQ (Frequently Asked
Questions) is accessible on the World Wide Web at URL
http://www.bio.net/.

If you can not find an answer to your question in this or other
documentation, the BIOSCI technical support staff answers e-mail
queries sent to

		       biosci-help@net.bio.net

We can only answer questions about the use of the newsgroups and
mailing lists.  We unfortunately do not have the staff to do Internet
information searches or answer scientific questions.  Please post
those to the appropriate BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.


	Contents:
	--------
	0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!

	1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.

	2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.

	3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.

	4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.


0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!
------------------------------
BIOSCI's government funding has been expended, and we are now
operating solely from advertising revenue that we have raised from our
Web site at http://www.bio.net/.  We need just a few minutes of your
time to help us serve you.

You can do two important things which will take very little time for
you individually and will immensely help us continue to help you.

First, please use our WWW system at http://www.bio.net/ to access the
archives.  You can post or reply to messages via your Web browser as
described in item #1 below.  Your usage helps attract sponsors. If you
contact any of our sponsors, please be sure to thank them for
supporting BIOSCI. It is critical for them to get this feedback if
they are to continue their sponsorship for the long term.

Second, if you work for a company or organization that provides
products or services of interest to the biology community, please pass
this message on to your marketing or marketing communications
department or other appropriate group.  Please ask them to help
support BIOSCI by sponsoring our Web site and explain the uses and
benefits of the system to the biology community. If they are
interested, the