From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 01 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!192.87.106.104!surfnet.nl!highway.leidenuniv.nl!ruly46!masc
From: Martijn Scheffers <masc@ruly46.medfac.leidenuniv.nl>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Signal sequences
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 11:25:46 +0100
Organization: Leiden University, The Netherlands
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.95q.980302111737.9123A-100000@ruly46>
References: <6d25t5$2k@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ruly46.medfac.leidenuniv.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: masc@ruly46
In-Reply-To: <6d25t5$2k@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu>


Hi there,

I'am looking for information about signal sequences and their functions in
protein transport aross the ER and to the plasma membrane.

Thanks,

Martijn.

**************************************************
Martijn Scheffers
RUL, fakulteit geneeskunde
Anthropogenetica
Wassenaarseweg 72
Postbus 9503
2300 RA Leiden
tel.  : 071-5276203
e-mail: M.Scheffers@ruly46.medfac.leidenuniv.nl
**************************************************



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 01 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.news.xara.net!xara.net!server5.netnews.ja.net!mserv1.dl.ac.uk!not-for-mail
From: ctzhang@tju.edu.cn (chun ting zhang)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: How to calculate the ratio of parallel to antiparallel strands
Date: 2 Mar 1998 13:56:33 -0000
Lines: 10
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <6dedqh$sbc@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Apparently-To: proteins@dl.ac.uk

Dear Netters:

I need a program to calculate the ratio of the parallel to anti-parallel
strands from a PDB file. Those who can show me the relevant Internet
address by which I can download the program will be highly appreciated.

Thank you very much.

R. Zhang (ctzhang@tju.edu.cn)


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 01 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!news-peer.gip.net!news-lond.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!nntp.news.xara.net!xara.net!server6.netnews.ja.net!server4.netnews.ja.net!server2.netnews.ja.net!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!guardian.dcs.warwick.ac.uk!warwick!leicester!usenet
From: "Dr E. Buxbaum" <EB15@le.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: How to purified a protein by its anti-body?
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 10:39:13 -0800
Organization: University of Leicester (PCFS User)
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <34FAFCD1.79B0@le.ac.uk>
References: <6p5K.530$wu2.1980305@carnaval.risq.qc.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc51.msb.le.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win16; I)

XIAOMING YANG wrote:
> 
> I had purified a human protein from two different cell lines. The way i
> took was to employ two different columns: DEAE sepharose and DNA agarose
> columns. But, the results show that there are other two more bands on
> SDS-PAGE gel. I want to take immunopercipitation way to make a further
> purification. How can I do? Protocal? Thank!

The first thing I would do is to make a western blot to see whether or
not the antibody binds to the other bands (this could happen for example
after partial proteolysis). If they don't, you can use the antibody for
further purification. 
Immunoprecipitation is suitable only for very small scale preparations
(ng-ug amounts). You incubate the protein with the antibody, then fish
out the complex with Protein A (or Protein G) agarose beads. Wash a
couple of times with high salt/mild detergent, then use the pellet
directly for example for SDS-PAGE. Alternatively, you can use dead
Staph. aureus bacteria (Pansorbin, Calbiochem) instead of Protein A
agarose (cheaper). Calbiochem has a free booklet on Pansorbin, which
contains suggestions for washing buffer composition.

For larger scale preps, couple your antibody to activated agarose
(several chemistries are available commercially, for example from
Pharmacia) and pack the gel into a small column. Load the column with
your sample, wash with high salt/mild detergent and elute with a
denaturing buffer (Diiodosalicylate or Glycine/HCl pH 4). In any case,
have some neutralising buffer in the tubes you use to collect the
fractions to minimize exposure of your protein to the elution buffer and
thoroughly wash the column with PBS or similar immediately afterwards.
With luck, both your protein and the antibody will withstand this
procedure without permanent damage. 

If you find the different bands again after these procedures, then they
may be part of an multi-subunit protein complex.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 01 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!guardian.dcs.warwick.ac.uk!warwick!leicester!usenet
From: "Dr E. Buxbaum" <EB15@le.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Ligand Binding
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 10:22:52 -0800
Organization: University of Leicester (PCFS User)
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <34FAF8FC.3E4D@le.ac.uk>
References: <6d27os$nla$1@agate.berkeley.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc51.msb.le.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win16; I)

Louis Hom wrote:
> 
> Basic question:
>         Is there an activation energy associated with ligand binding?

Yes, there is, and it is easy to measure. Simply determine the Kd at
various temperatures and plot ln(Kd) vs the reciprocal temperature
(absolute temperature, i.e. in Kelvin). If certain conditions are met,
then the data points will be on a straight line, from the slope of which
you can calculate the activation energy.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 01 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed2.uk.ibm.net!ibm.net!nntp.news.xara.net!xara.net!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!server1.netnews.ja.net!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!guardian.dcs.warwick.ac.uk!warwick!leicester!usenet
From: "Dr E. Buxbaum" <EB15@le.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Algal Biliproteins
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 10:15:46 -0800
Organization: University of Leicester (PCFS User)
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <34FAF752.4BC7@le.ac.uk>
References: <6d079e$cqm$1@Venus.mcs.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc51.msb.le.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win16; I)

Deirdre Sholto-Douglas wrote:
 
> He describes using a Calcium phosphate gel column and the addition
> of stepwise phosphate buffers to elute the coloured proteins from
>  _Porphyra_. His methodology states that Celite was mixed to the
> gel "as support" but its unclear exactly how much was used.
> Admittedly, the gel is decidedly unstable as is and would probably
> benefit from the addition of diatomaceous earth.
> 
> Has anyone done something similar or know the rough proportions
> of such a mixture?

If by Calcium phosphate you mean Hydroxyapatite, then there are nice
beaded forms of this material on the market, for example from BioRad. An
introduction into HA chromatography can be found in Deutscher's "Guide
to Protein Purification" (in the Methods in Enzymology series).

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 01 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed2.uk.ibm.net!ibm.net!nntp.news.xara.net!xara.net!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!server1.netnews.ja.net!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!guardian.dcs.warwick.ac.uk!warwick!leicester!usenet
From: "Dr E. Buxbaum" <EB15@le.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: stable protein complex during SDS-PAGE
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 10:09:01 -0800
Organization: University of Leicester (PCFS User)
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <34FAF5BD.1542@le.ac.uk>
References: <urbig-2302981350190001@dhcp-132.biokemi.su.se> <01bd4167$1c88b480$df80808f@bchm7.bch.unp.ac.za>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc51.msb.le.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win16; I)

brendon wrote:
> 
> Thomas <urbig@biokemi.su.se> wrote in article
> HI - I HAVE HAD THE SAME TROUBLE IN THE PAST. YOU CAN DENATURE YOUR
> PROTEINS IN 6M GUANIDINE HCL, 5 mM EDTA, pH 8.1. FROM THERE, REDUCE WITH
> DITHIOTHREITOL AND CARBOXMETHYLATE.  GOOD LUCK

Guanidinum HCl may not be the ideal reagent for use in electrophoresis.
Urea, being non-charged, might be the better choice. The other little
trick I found usefull is to incubate the sample in Laemli buffer for 30
min at 37 degrees, instead of boiling them.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 01 22:00:00 1998
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!news1.chicago.iagnet.net!news2.chicago.iagnet.net!qual.net!iagnet.net!newsxfer3.itd.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gumby!newspump.wustl.edu!biko.cc.rochester.edu!news.acsu.buffalo.edu!srv1.drenet.dnd.ca!crc-news.doc.ca!nott!kwon!utnut!utinfo!nntp
From: Sam Lee <samuel.lee@utoronto.ca>
Subject: pRK5 Expression Vector
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: pharm4358b.med.utoronto.ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <34FB4315.94B62778@utoronto.ca>
Sender: nntp@utcc.utoronto.ca (News)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: University of Toronto
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 23:39:01 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (Win95; I)
Lines: 22
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:65396 bionet.molbio.proteins:12387

Hello All,

Does anyone have any information on the pRK5 expression vector? Most
importantly, what is its antibiotic resistance? What are the commercial
sources of this vector.

I have seen questions about pRK5 asked before in usenet discussion groups,
but I have not seen an answer. I have also thoroughly searched the internet
and can find no mention of it. Is there a reason why, apparently, no one
uses this vector these days?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Sam.

-------------------------------------
samuel.lee@utoronto.ca

Department of Pharmacology
University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario
Canada

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 01 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!ACC.WUACC.EDU!zzbart
From: zzbart@ACC.WUACC.EDU (barton jan)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Ligand Binding
Date: 2 Mar 1998 08:10:48 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 31
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.3.96.980302100603.473648A-100000@acc.wuacc.edu>
References: <34FAF8FC.3E4D@le.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net



On Mon, 2 Mar 1998, Dr E. Buxbaum wrote:

> Louis Hom wrote:
> > 
> > Basic question:
> >         Is there an activation energy associated with ligand binding?
> 
> Yes, there is, and it is easy to measure. Simply determine the Kd at
> various temperatures and plot ln(Kd) vs the reciprocal temperature
> (absolute temperature, i.e. in Kelvin). If certain conditions are met,
> then the data points will be on a straight line, from the slope of which
> you can calculate the activation energy.
> 
> 
There seems to be some confusion about kinetic and equilibrium processes.
Kinetic processes yield the activation energy when the ln(rate constant)
if plotted vs i/T.  Equilibrium processes yield the standard enthalpy
change when the equilibrium/dissociation constant is substituted for the
rate constant in the ln term.

Janice S. Barton, Ph.D. 
Professor and Chair of Chemistry
Department of Chemistry
Washburn University, Topeka, KS 66621
zzbart@washburn.edu
785-231-1010-x1269




From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 02 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de!Junghans
From: Junghans@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de (Junghans)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Staining of PVDF after transfer?
Date: 3 Mar 1998 06:08:03 -0800
Organization: mpih-frankfurt
Lines: 22
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <34FC0E1D.D33FCCE3@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de>
Reply-To: Junghans@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hi
I have a problem with staining of PVDF-membranes after western-blot
transfer.
How can I stain the marker or in general my proteins before
immunodetection. I tried PonceauS but this didn't work even after adding
some methanol the result was not very promising, because only very
strong bands were recognized.
Does anybody know a more sensitive method?
Thanks, Dirk Junghans
--
**************************************
Dirk Junghans
Max-Planck-Institut f. Hirnforschung
Abt. Neurochemie
Deutschordenstr. 46
60528 Frankfurt am Main

e-mail: junghans@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de
Tel. ++49 - 69-96769-457
Fax. ++49 - 69-96769-441
 


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 02 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!ais.net!newsm.ibm.net!ibm.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!news.pprd.abbott.com!unixadmin@pprd.abbott.com
From: Seth Crosby <crosbys@ugene1.pprd.abbott.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.cellbio
Subject: Tet inducible mouse
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 08:55:20 -0500
Organization: Abbott Labs
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <34FC0BB5.7F492432@ugene1.pprd.abbott.com>
Reply-To: crosbys@ugene1.pprd.abbott.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: lc922990.pprd.abbott.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:65421 bionet.molbio.proteins:12394

Hello All,

We would like to purchase a mouse transgenic for reverse tet repressor
(rTetR a.k.a. "pTet-on").  If your lab has any to spare, please contact
me.

Thanks!!
--
Seth Crosby, MD
Senior Research Scientist
Genomics/Bioinformatics
Dept. 04MD, Bldg. AP9A/3
Abbott Labs
Abbott Park, IL
(847) 938-6999
FAX  938-6046



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 02 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!news.Stanford.EDU!nntp.Stanford.EDU!not-for-mail
From: jladasky@pmgm.Stanford.EDU (John Ladasky)
Newsgroups: bionet.cellbiol,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Gradient separations of Organelles
Date: 3 Mar 1998 11:53:45 -0800
Organization: Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <6dhn49$vv@pmgm.Stanford.EDU>
References: <6dhim0$oqi$1@news.duke.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pmgm.stanford.edu
Xref: biosci bionet.cellbiol:8980 bionet.molbio.proteins:12392

In article <6dhim0$oqi$1@news.duke.edu>,
William P. Tschantz <tschantz@galactose.mc.duke.edu> wrote:
>Hi
>
>I am looking for a reletively easy protocal to separate different membrane
>fractions by gradient centrifugation preferably using sucrose or percoll
>gradients.  Mostly want to separate PM, golgi, mitochondria and lysosomes.
>Any references to point me in the right direction would be greatly
>appreciated.

	Ira Mellman's group has succeeded in isolating endosomal organelles
using an electrophoresis technique.  I heard him speak in 1996, about the
time that Immunity 1996 Mar;4(3):229-239 came out, so you might want to
start with that reference.  I don't know whether this would suit your needs,
since you seem to want to use gradient centrifugation, but check it out.

	Good luck!

-- 
Rainforest laid low.
"Wake up and smell the ozone,"
Says man with chainsaw.					- John Ladasky

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 02 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsgate.duke.edu!galactose.mc.duke.edu.uucp!tschantz
From: tschantz@galactose.mc.duke.edu (William P. Tschantz)
Newsgroups: bionet.cellbiol,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Gradient separations of Organelles
Date: 3 Mar 1998 18:37:52 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.
Lines: 17
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <6dhim0$oqi$1@news.duke.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: galactose.mc.duke.edu
Xref: biosci bionet.cellbiol:8979 bionet.molbio.proteins:12391

Hi

I am looking for a reletively easy protocal to separate different membrane
fractions by gradient centrifugation preferably using sucrose or percoll
gradients.  Mostly want to separate PM, golgi, mitochondria and lysosomes.
Any references to point me in the right direction would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks in advance

Bill

-- 
| William R. Tschantz, Ph.D.                 *                        |
| Dept of Pharmacology and  Cancer Biology   *                        |
| Duke University, Durham, NC                * Got Homebrew ??        |
| tschantz@galactose.mc.duke.edu             *                        |

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 02 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!193.174.75.126!news-was.dfn.de!news-fra1.dfn.de!zeus.rbi.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de!grapool30.rz.uni-frankfurt.de!parcej
From: parcej@biophys.mpg.de (Dr Dave Parcej)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Staining of PVDF after transfer?
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 08:46:17 +0100
Organization: MPI fuer Biophysik
Lines: 18
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <parcej-0403980846170001@mac-kb5.biophys.mpg.de>
References: <34FC0E1D.D33FCCE3@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de> <parcej-0303981541170001@mac-kb5.biophys.mpg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mac-kb5.biophys.mpg.de
X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.3.5

In article <parcej-0303981541170001@mac-kb5.biophys.mpg.de>,
parcej@biophys.mpg.de (Dr Dave Parcej) wrote:

Thats 0.01% sulphorhodamine!!!!!!

> Dirk
> Its odd that Ponceau S didnt work, but maybe youd like to try this:
> Briefly dip the blot in a 0.01%(w/v) prepared in 30% methanol. I think (ie
> you should test it with an unimportant sample first!) that you can destain
> with either water or methanol. We used this for preparing samples for
> sequencing.
> Heres the reference:
> Pappin et al (1990) Analyt Biochem. 187, 10-19
> Let me know how it works!
> Dave
> 
> 
>

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 02 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!news.scripps.edu!not-for-mail
From: "Geoffrey Swanson" <swanson@salk.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: pRK5 Expression Vector
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 08:43:57 -0800
Organization: The Salk Institute
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <6dhc1c$8r9$1@hermes.scripps.edu>
References: <34FB4315.94B62778@utoronto.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cornetto.salk.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:65426 bionet.molbio.proteins:12395


Sam Lee wrote in message <34FB4315.94B62778@utoronto.ca>...
>Hello All,
>
>Does anyone have any information on the pRK5 expression vector? ....>

I have a more-or-less correct map for pRK5. Email your details and I will
send a copy to you. The antibiotic resistance is amp. As far as I know,
there are no commercial sources for this vector. There isn't much of a
useful MCS, which is probably why not many people use it any more.

Geoff Swanson
Email: swanson@salk.edu



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 02 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!nntp.kreonet.re.kr!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.algonet.se!newsfeed.sollentuna.se!newsfeed.interlog.com!news.interlog.com!lemmings
From: lemmings@interlog.com (Carol Thomas)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Anyone doing proteomics research?
Followup-To: bionet.molbio.proteins
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 20:33:37 GMT
Organization: Interlog Internet Services
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <6dhoum$688$1@news.interlog.com>
Reply-To: lemmings@interlog.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: lemmings.interlog.com
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01

..and willing to be interviewed about it via email?

Forgive me for invading your newsgroup, but I'm a science writer with a 
tough assignment: 1500 words on proteomics by Friday, March 6th.  Since 
I normally do medical writing, this is slightly out of my field.  I've 
researched proteomics and do know what it is and how it's generally 
done, but I really need to find a few kind souls who wouldn't mind being 

interviewed, since my usual sources aren't appropriate.

What I was thinking of was a short list of questions -- what do you 
think the benefits of proteomics are, how can it help in the drug 
discovery process, how can it be done faster/more effectively, that kind 

of thing -- sent by email.  If you prefer, I'll call you long-distance 
to talk.  If you're willing to help, I'll use all your quotes accurately 

(I'm a perfectionist about quote accuracy!) and cite you with your full 
title as a source.  The magazine is Laboratory Focus, based in Ontario, 
but non-Canadian sources are entirely welcome.

I'd be very grateful for any interviewees.  Email me at 
lemmings@interlog.com or post here -- I'll be checking the newsgroup 
every day.

Many thanks,

Carol Thomas, B.Sc.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 02 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!news.tu-darmstadt.de!grapool30.rz.uni-frankfurt.de!parcej
From: parcej@biophys.mpg.de (Dr Dave Parcej)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Staining of PVDF after transfer?
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 15:41:17 +0100
Organization: MPI fuer Biophysik
Lines: 36
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <parcej-0303981541170001@mac-kb5.biophys.mpg.de>
References: <34FC0E1D.D33FCCE3@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mac-kb5.biophys.mpg.de
X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.3.5

Dirk
Its odd that Ponceau S didnt work, but maybe youd like to try this:
Briefly dip the blot in a 0.01%(w/v) prepared in 30% methanol. I think (ie
you should test it with an unimportant sample first!) that you can destain
with either water or methanol. We used this for preparing samples for
sequencing.
Heres the reference:
Pappin et al (1990) Analyt Biochem. 187, 10-19
Let me know how it works!
Dave


article <34FC0E1D.D33FCCE3@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de>,
Junghans@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de wrote:

> Hi
> I have a problem with staining of PVDF-membranes after western-blot
> transfer.
> How can I stain the marker or in general my proteins before
> immunodetection. I tried PonceauS but this didn't work even after adding
> some methanol the result was not very promising, because only very
> strong bands were recognized.
> Does anybody know a more sensitive method?
> Thanks, Dirk Junghans
> --
> **************************************
> Dirk Junghans
> Max-Planck-Institut f. Hirnforschung
> Abt. Neurochemie
> Deutschordenstr. 46
> 60528 Frankfurt am Main
> 
> e-mail: junghans@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de
> Tel. ++49 - 69-96769-457
> Fax. ++49 - 69-96769-441
>

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 02 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!feed2.news.erols.com!erols!newsxfer.visi.net!nntp.news.xara.net!xara.net!server5.netnews.ja.net!server3.netnews.ja.net!server1.netnews.ja.net!bham!med1000.bham.ac.uk!user
From: noone@cancer.bham.ac.uk (noone)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Staining of PVDF after transfer?
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 17:49:14 +0000
Organization: noone
Lines: 24
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <noone-0303981749140001@med1000.bham.ac.uk>
References: <34FC0E1D.D33FCCE3@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de> <parcej-0303981541170001@mac-kb5.biophys.mpg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: med1000.bham.ac.uk

In article <parcej-0303981541170001@mac-kb5.biophys.mpg.de>,
parcej@biophys.mpg.de (Dr Dave Parcej) wrote:


> > Hi
> > I have a problem with staining of PVDF-membranes after western-blot
> > transfer.
> > How can I stain the marker or in general my proteins before
> > immunodetection. I tried PonceauS but this didn't work even after adding
> > some methanol the result was not very promising, because only very
> > strong bands were recognized.
> > Does anybody know a more sensitive method?
> > Thanks, Dirk Junghans


Hi Dirk,

what's your recipe for the Ponceau? You have to add something like
Sulfosalicylic acid or TCA to precipitate the protein.
Anyway, the Ponceau stain is very insensitive compared to Amidoblack T etc.

Peter

p.weber@bham.ac.uk

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 03 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!daresbury!uninett.no!news.maxwell.syr.edu!korova.insync.net!news.io.com!news.tamu.edu!news.ttu.edu!usenet
From: "Benan Dincturk" <knben@ttacs.ttu.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Signal sequences
Date: 4 Mar 1998 21:04:44 GMT
Organization: Texas Tech Academic Computing Services
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <01bd47b0$7c1af6c0$5d227681@chm407-1.chem.ttu.edu>
References: <6d25t5$2k@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu> <Pine.SUN.3.95q.980302111737.9123A-100000@ruly46>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chm407-1.chem.ttu.edu
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161

Anthony Pugsley's book called "Protein Targeting" which is published in
1989 by Academic Press is a very good reference for signal peptides.

Benan
knben@ttacs.ttu.edu

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 03 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!news.idt.net!woodstock.news.demon.net!demon!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!nntp.news.xara.net!xara.net!server5.netnews.ja.net!server3.netnews.ja.net!server1.netnews.ja.net!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!guardian.dcs.warwick.ac.uk!warwick!leicester!usenet
From: "Dr E. Buxbaum" <EB15@le.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Staining of PVDF after transfer?
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 13:47:54 -0800
Organization: University of Leicester (PCFS User)
Message-ID: <34FDCC0A.EAE@le.ac.uk>
References: <34FC0E1D.D33FCCE3@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc48.msb.le.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win16; I)
Lines: 15

Junghans wrote:
> 
> Hi
> I have a problem with staining of PVDF-membranes after western-blot
> transfer.
> How can I stain the marker or in general my proteins before
> immunodetection.

I would use prestained marker proteins, which are available commercialy
from Sigma, BioRad and other companies. Slightly more expensive than the
non-stained version, but  time saving and convenient. The "rainbow
markers" from BioRad are particularly convenient imho, as the different
proteins have different colours and can be easily and unambigously
identified, even if the gel has been left to run a little too long, so
that the front is no longer visible.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 03 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.labyrinth.net.au!news.alphalink.com.au!not-for-mail
From: "Justin Clift" <vapour@cryogen.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Anyone heard from Harry Banaharis lately?  Know about the protein folding website?
Date: 5 Mar 1998 03:00:53 GMT
Organization: Alphalink Australia
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <01bd4786$95873da0$e1b73ecb@knight>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp18-9-3.alphalink.com.au
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161

:-)

Just as the subject says...

I'm trying to find Harry John Banaharis and the protein folding site he was
going to create....

Any news or updates?

Regards and best wishes,

+ Justin Clift
Digital Distribution

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 03 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.kodak.com!news-pen-14.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!128.122.253.90!newsfeed.nyu.edu!news.idt.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uninett.no!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!guardian.dcs.warwick.ac.uk!warwick!not-for-mail
From: bssbc@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Dr D T Jones)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: UK Studentships Available
Date: 4 Mar 1998 21:28:15 -0000
Organization: University of Warwick, UK
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <6dkh1f$ibp@lupin.csv.warwick.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lupin-fddi.csv.warwick.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]


                    UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK
              DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES

                   PROTEIN STRUCTURE GROUP

BBSRC STUDENTSHIPS IN PROTEIN STRUCTURE & BIOINFORMATICS AVAILABLE

Applications are invited for a number of BBSRC Studentships available
in the Department of Biological Sciences.

Studentships are avilable for projects in the following areas:

Viral Crystallography         - Supervisor Dr Rob Mckenna,
                                E-mail: mckenna@globin.bio.warwick.ac.uk

Protein Crystallography       - Supervisor Dr Vilmos Fulop,
                                E-mail: vilmos@globin.bio.warwick.ac.uk

Protein Structure Prediction  - Supervisor Dr David Jones,
(Bioinformatics)                E-mail: jones@globin.bio.warwick.ac.uk


For general details on the Protein Structure Group, please check the
following Web page:

http://globin.bio.warwick.ac.uk/structure/structure.html


PLEASE NOTE: Eligibility

1. Candidates must have (or expect to get) a 1st or upper second class
   honours degree (or equivalent).

2. The candidate must be a UK Citizen who has been ordinarily resident
   in Great Britain for at least 3 years.

For general information about the Department of Biological Sciences,
please browse the following address:

http://www.oikos.warwick.ac.uk

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 03 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.nacamar.de!fu-berlin.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news.ruhr-uni-bochum.de!not-for-mail
From: Markus Piotrowski <Markus.Piotrowski@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Staining of PVDF after transfer?
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 18:19:59 +0100
Organization: Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <34FD8D3F.49CAE222@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
References: <34FC0E1D.D33FCCE3@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialppp-5-37.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (Win95; I)
To: Junghans@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de
Xcanpos: shelf.01/199803182101!0023565321

Hi Dirk,

proteins on PVDF can be stained with Coomassie-blue (Ponceau
S will not work)! Simply use your gel stain- and
destain-solutions. Unfortunately, I don't know how good it
can be destained and if remaining blue color will interfere
with your following detection (for example in Westerns). If
you want to make Westerns and you use an ECL-system,
remaining blue color will be no problem for you.
Alternatively, use amido-black.

Give it a try, hope this will help you

Markus

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Mar 04 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!news.ttu.edu!usenet
From: "Benan Dincturk" <knben@ttacs.ttu.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: ideal yeast expression system for (plant) protein expression
Date: 5 Mar 1998 17:47:41 GMT
Organization: Texas Tech Academic Computing Services
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <01bd485e$29aef720$5d227681@chm407-1.chem.ttu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chm407-1.chem.ttu.edu
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161

Hello netters

E. coli expression does not seem to work for my huge protein. So while I am
playing with E. coli vectors, I plan to start with yeast expression. Who
has experience with yeast? Can you suggest some vectors with strong
promoters? What are the important points in yeast transformation? I know
that is the thoughest part usually. I am a beginner so every suggestion
will be appreciated. Thank you all.

Benan


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Mar 04 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!news.net.uni-c.dk!news.uni-c.dk!not-for-mail
From: "Claus S. Nielsen" <SCHAFER-N@SYMBION.DK>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: HPLC Hitachi   help me
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 20:08:49 +0100
Organization: Schafer-N
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <34FEF841.74CA@SYMBION.DK>
Reply-To: SCHAFER-N@SYMBION.DK
NNTP-Posting-Host: schafer-n.symbion.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)

We got an old HPLC from Hitachi, but the manual is lost. Does anyone
have operating instructions for the 655-61 Processor A controller?

Claus Nielsen
Schafer-N
Symbion Science Park
2100 Copenhagen O
Denmark

Fax + 45 39273801
Tel + 45 30273800
shafer-n@symbion.dk

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Mar 04 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!news.tu-darmstadt.de!News.Uni-Marburg.DE!not-for-mail
From: Marco Bocola <bocola@mailer.uni-marburg.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Ligand Binding
Date: 5 Mar 1998 17:36:00 GMT
Organization: HRZ Uni Marburg
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <34FEE20C.6B4EE985@mailer.uni-marburg.de>
References: <6d27os$nla$1@agate.berkeley.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc1661.pharmazie.uni-marburg.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (WinNT; I)
To: Louis Hom <lhom@nature.berkeley.edu>



Louis Hom wrote:

> Basic question:
>         Is there an activation energy associated with ligand binding?
> There has to be, right?  Since you have to displace solvent?
>         This came up after I was talking to an undergrad about basic
> enzyme behavior and the effects on the activation energy of the catalyzed
> reaction and I got to thinking about the reaction that catalyzes the
> reaction.
>         meta-reactions.
> --
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> Lou Hom >K '93
> lhom@nature.berkeley.edu
> http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~lhom

Don't forget about conformational changes of proteins (receptors,channels etc.)
during the binding process (induced fit !!!) which are believed to play the central
role in binding thermodynamics besides the solvation-desolvation process.




From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Mar 04 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!nntp.kreonet.re.kr!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!news.tu-darmstadt.de!News.Uni-Marburg.DE!not-for-mail
From: Marco Bocola <bocola@mailer.uni-marburg.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Ligand Binding
Date: 5 Mar 1998 17:35:40 GMT
Organization: HRZ Uni Marburg
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <34FEE1F7.F648B92@mailer.uni-marburg.de>
References: <6d27os$nla$1@agate.berkeley.edu> <34FAF8FC.3E4D@le.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc1661.pharmazie.uni-marburg.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (WinNT; I)



Dr E. Buxbaum wrote:

> Louis Hom wrote:
> >
> > Basic question:
> >         Is there an activation energy associated with ligand binding?
>
> Yes, there is, and it is easy to measure. Simply determine the Kd at
> various temperatures and plot ln(Kd) vs the reciprocal temperature
> (absolute temperature, i.e. in Kelvin). If certain conditions are met,
> then the data points will be on a straight line, from the slope of which
> you can calculate the activation energy.

 under the assumption that the heat capacity of the system, the local
environment and solvation and furthermore the conformation and folding of
the protein is temperature independent......


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Mar 04 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!bofh.vszbr.cz!news.eecs.umich.edu!news.niehs.nih.gov!not-for-mail
From: Mara Casar <casar@niehs.nih.gov>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Staining of PVDF after transfer?
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 11:56:07 -0500
Organization: NIEHS
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <34FED927.35B4@niehs.nih.gov>
References: <34FC0E1D.D33FCCE3@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ecarballo-jane.niehs.nih.gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.02 (Macintosh; I; PPC)

You can also stain a blot AFTER doing your Western (ECL, HRP, etc.)
detection.  Use Coomassie G-250, not R-250 - R is the one you use for
gels.  Make up the stain and destains the same way as you would for
gels, but then stain your blot for just a few minutes.  It's not
reversible, though, so it's best to do it last.

-Mara

------
Junghans wrote:
> 
> Hi
> I have a problem with staining of PVDF-membranes after western-blot
> transfer.
> How can I stain the marker or in general my proteins before
> immunodetection. I tried PonceauS but this didn't work even after adding
> some methanol the result was not very promising, because only very
> strong bands were recognized.
> Does anybody know a more sensitive method?
> Thanks, Dirk Junghans
> --
> **************************************
> Dirk Junghans
> Max-Planck-Institut f. Hirnforschung
> Abt. Neurochemie
> Deutschordenstr. 46
> 60528 Frankfurt am Main
> 
> e-mail: junghans@mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de
> Tel. ++49 - 69-96769-457
> Fax. ++49 - 69-96769-441
>

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Mar 04 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!news.ttu.edu!usenet
From: "Benan Dincturk" <knben@ttacs.ttu.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Best expression system for (plant) protein expression in yeast
Date: 5 Mar 1998 17:41:58 GMT
Organization: Texas Tech Academic Computing Services
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <01bd485d$5d6e25a0$5d227681@chm407-1.chem.ttu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chm407-1.chem.ttu.edu
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161

Hello netters

E. coli expression does not seem to work for my huge protein. So while I am
playing with E. coli vectors, I plan to start with yeast expression. Who
has experience with yeast? Can you suggest some vectors with strong
promoters? What are the important points in yeast transformation? I know
that is the thoughest part usually. I am a beginner so every suggestion
will be appreciated. Thank you all.

Benan


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Mar 05 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news-peer.gip.net!news-raspail.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!newscore.univie.ac.at!news-ge.switch.ch!news.unige.ch!news
From: "Andreas Mühlemann" <Andreas.Muehlemann@biochem.unige.ch>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: How can I isolate targets of proteins (cytosolic) ?
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 13:40:47 +0100
Organization: University of Geneva
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <6doqrc$mdo@uni2f.unige.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.194.52.82
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4

Hello !
I'm working on a neuronal cytosolic protein and I'd like to
isolate its unknown target in vivo.
Any ideas on the approach I could choose ?

Tanx.
Andreas.



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Mar 05 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsxfer3.itd.umich.edu!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!server1.netnews.ja.net!bham!med1018.bham.ac.uk!user
From: noone@cancer.bham.ac.uk (noone)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: How can I isolate targets of proteins (cytosolic) ?
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 14:55:10 +0000
Organization: noone
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <noone-0603981455100001@med1018.bham.ac.uk>
References: <6doqrc$mdo@uni2f.unige.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: med1018.bham.ac.uk

In article <6doqrc$mdo@uni2f.unige.ch>, "Andreas Mühlemann"
<Andreas.Muehlemann@biochem.unige.ch> wrote:

> Hello !
> I'm working on a neuronal cytosolic protein and I'd like to
> isolate its unknown target in vivo.
> Any ideas on the approach I could choose ?
> 
> Tanx.
> Andreas.

Hi Andreas,

I think some of the usual approaches are

Immunoprecipitation
Yeast two hybrid
Expression of tagged protein and pull-out assay
BiaCore


Peter

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Mar 05 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!howland.erols.net!fastnet!ptdnetP!newsgate.ptd.net!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!server1.netnews.ja.net!bham!med1018.bham.ac.uk!user
From: noone@cancer.bham.ac.uk (noone)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: subcellular fractionation
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 14:57:47 +0000
Organization: noone
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <noone-0603981457470001@med1018.bham.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: med1018.bham.ac.uk

Hi,

I'm looking for a reliable method for subcellular fractionation (samples
for Western) of adherent cells (like human kidney cells, 293's etc.)
Any suggestions would be appreciated,

Peter

p.weber@bham.ac.uk

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Mar 05 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsgate.duke.edu!interpath.net!nntp.news.xara.net!xara.net!server5.netnews.ja.net!server3.netnews.ja.net!server1.netnews.ja.net!news.nott.ac.uk!pmbfjd0.nottingham.ac.uk!user
From: mbzrl@mbn1.biochem.nottingham.ac.uk (Rob)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Disappearing His-tagged proteins
Followup-To: bionet.molbio.proteins
Date: 6 Mar 1998 11:50:18 GMT
Organization: University of Nottingham
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <mbzrl-060398114555@pmbfjd0.nottingham.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pmbfjd0.nottingham.ac.uk

Hi
Has anyone experienced his-tagged proteins apparently 'disappearing' on
FPLC gel filtration columns (eg Superose 6 or 12 columns). I assume they're
coming out of solution, but it's happened now for the last 2 his-tagged
proteins I've tried to purify but doesn't happen for the GST-tagged
equivalents.... Very strange!
Thanks in advance
Rob

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Mar 05 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!newsfeed.nacamar.de!news-kar1.dfn.de!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-ber1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.mu-luebeck.de!not-for-mail
From: "Lars Komorowski" <larskomo@physik.mu-luebeck.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.software
Subject: Proposal for a new bionet newsgroup
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:13:33 +0100
Organization: Med. Universitaet zu Luebeck
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <6dobf1$4cj$1@gwsun.medinf.mu-luebeck.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.83.167.168
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:65549 bionet.molbio.proteins:12408 bionet.software:20661

I propose to set up a new newsgroup for used lab euipment. Who is interested
?
Lars Komorowski
Ins. f. Biochemie
Med. Univ. Luebeck, Germany



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sat Mar 07 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!news1.chicago.iagnet.net!qual.net!iagnet.net!btnet-peer!btnet!newsfeed.metronet.de!news.metronet.de!not-for-mail
From: "J. Jockers" <jjockers@metronet.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.microbiology,bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Problems with beta-Galactosidase and X-Gal
Followup-To: bionet.microbiology
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 01:27:25 +0100
Organization: Metronet
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <6dvd15$74m$1@news.metronet.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kaiserslautern1.pop.metronet.de
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
Xref: biosci bionet.microbiology:12663 bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:65596 bionet.molbio.proteins:12413

Hello!

I am searching for a method to examine funghi for
extracellular beta-galactosidase activity.
Right now I am using X-Gal
(5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indonyl-beta-D-galactopyanoside) as
substrate for this enzyme. I add a (low concentrated) X-Gal
solution to the medium of the funghi. 24 hours later I check
the medium for  blue coloring. I think that I see blue
enzyme-pigment complexes in the medium, because of the
unsolubility of the blue complex.
Well, at least it DOES work, but the results are
unsufficient reproducible, quantitative and reliable. I know
that the use of X-Gal in this case is rather unusual, but I
saw no other way to carry out this task ia a easy and simple
way.

- I know that X-Gal is actual unsoluble in water. But what
about the blue complex after X-Gal has been spit by the
enzyme?
- Does anybody know a "smart" method to do this thing
another way or improve the reliability of this test?
- Does anybody know something about the stability of aquatic
X-Gal-solutions? (In my opinion they degrade quite rapidly
even at storage temperatures of 2-8 degrees celsius)

I would be very happy for any tips and hints that could help
me to solve this problems!

thank you very much!
Jochen, Germany

(please forgive me my very awkward English!)   <- is this
correct, after all?   :-)






From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 08 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!Lightyear
From: Lightyear@uiuc.edu.nospam (Matt)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Best expression system for (plant) protein expression in yeast
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 13:19:51 -0600
Organization: US Robotics and Mechanical Men
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <Lightyear-0903981319510001@bushlab1.life.uiuc.edu>
References: <01bd485d$5d6e25a0$5d227681@chm407-1.chem.ttu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bushlab1.life.uiuc.edu
X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.3.5
X-Face: $VCBL>c'm[sO:~:%UH#A--p2Mjs163<#Yal[|)8@\?Yj"&7`l(h:-VDzvSu3!
        2AU,zEj|^Fu`Igw%qgr'0e)V:pp@$OG&,gIYy>Z"$VO#CX0"&:4vH|sekTYL[r"tT}

Lambda-YES is a great single-copy plasmid with a Gal-Inducible Promoter
and a URA marker..  we use it all the time here. As far as transformation
is concerned, electroporation a la E. coli is fairly effective..  we have
a protocol or two if you're interested.

Matt Vaughn



In article <01bd485d$5d6e25a0$5d227681@chm407-1.chem.ttu.edu>, "Benan
Dincturk" <knben@ttacs.ttu.edu> wrote:

> Hello netters
> 
> E. coli expression does not seem to work for my huge protein. So while I am
> playing with E. coli vectors, I plan to start with yeast expression. Who
> has experience with yeast? Can you suggest some vectors with strong
> promoters? What are the important points in yeast transformation? I know
> that is the thoughest part usually. I am a beginner so every suggestion
> will be appreciated. Thank you all.
> 
> Benan

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice; in practice, however, there is no similarity 

Matthew Vaughn
University of Illinois Department of Biology
190 ERML 1201 W. Gregory Drive
Urbana, IL 61801

PS: You know the part about removing the nospam from the end of my email don't you? I hate to do it but I have gotten some TRULY XXX offensive spams lately and can't tolerate them anymore.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 08 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsgate.duke.edu!nntp-out.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!ais.net!uunet!in4.uu.net!hearst.acc.Virginia.EDU!murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU!not-for-mail
From: John S Walker <jsw9c@virginia.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: "Halos" in Western Blots; What are they?
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 16:57:01 -0500
Organization: University of Virginia
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <350465AD.5DED9FB5@virginia.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mars.med.virginia.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01GoldC-Caldera (X11; I; Linux 2.0.30 i486)

G'day,

I'm a newbie to doing Western blots. At present I'm trying to optimise a
technique for quantifying the percentage phosphorylation of a protein.
The protocol i'm following consists of an isoelectric focusing gel that
is then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane.  The membrane is then
exposed to primary and secondary antibodies.  The detection system uses
enhanced chemiluminescence with a horseradish peroxidase linked
secondary.  The light is detected using x-ray film.  At present we are
having problems with linearity of response and a steep response curve
(i.e. we only go from detection limit to saturation over a five-fold
range of protein concentrations) In addition, and this brings me to my
question, we have halo's around the detection bands, i.e. a light band
just above the more heavily stained 'normal' location of the band.  I've
read some accounts that say that this is due to protein overloading and
some that say it's due to excessive antibody.  Can anybody give me a
clear answer as to what causes these halo's and why?  I don't think that
this is a 'real' band.


John Walker
Dept of Physiology
University of Virginia

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 08 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!NIC.BMI.AC.CN!zhangzg
From: zhangzg@NIC.BMI.AC.CN ("Fei WANG")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: help to concentration
Date: 9 Mar 1998 00:32:51 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 4
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <01bd4b35$7f0d7460$ae247aca@pupo>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

hi, every bodies. i want to concentrate a protein for medicine use,for
injection. i want a method not increase the pyrogen level or DNA content in
final product and at the same time to get the protein product to 2 mg/ml.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 08 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!news.ucsc.edu!tjandra
From: tjandra@darwin.ucsc.edu (hT)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts
Subject: pCAL  or CaM-binding Peptide fusion proteins
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 15:01:03 -0700
Organization: biology
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <tjandra-ya02408000R0903981501030001@darkstar.ucsc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kellogg-lab1.ucsc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.4.0
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.proteins:12418 bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:65620

Hi Everyone: I am soliciting comments from those who have used the pCAL-n/c
plasmid that is available from Stragene, San Diego.  i am wondering if
there is any good and bad thing* I should know of before I order the
plasmid.  Please cc your comments to tjandra@darwin.ucsc.edu and i will
summarize any 'interesting' point in a later posting.  Many thanks.  Hendri

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 08 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!CC.USU.EDU!sl86b
From: sl86b@CC.USU.EDU (Ben)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Gigapite Column
Date: 9 Mar 1998 13:47:14 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 14
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <v03007800b129aecc3d6e@[129.123.32.4]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Is there anyone out there who knows what a Gigapite column is, and if so
who manufactures it?  Came across a paper by a Japanese group which used
the column to purify a lipase.

Thanks,

Benjamin Dias
SL86B@cc.usu.edu
Dept. of Nutrition and Food Science
Utah State University,
Logan, UT 84322
(801) 797 2123



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 08 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!news.ttu.edu!usenet
From: "Benan Dincturk" <knben@ttacs.ttu.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Best expression system for (plant) protein expression in yeast
Date: 9 Mar 1998 23:45:23 GMT
Organization: Texas Tech Academic Computing Services
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <01bd4bb4$b008b8c0$5d227681@chm407-1.chem.ttu.edu>
References: <01bd485d$5d6e25a0$5d227681@chm407-1.chem.ttu.edu> <Lightyear-0903981319510001@bushlab1.life.uiuc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chm407-1.chem.ttu.edu
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161



Matt <Lightyear@uiuc.edu.nospam> wrote in article
<Lightyear-0903981319510001@bushlab1.life.uiuc.edu>...
> Lambda-YES is a great single-copy plasmid with a Gal-Inducible Promoter
> and a URA marker..  we use it all the time here. As far as transformation
> is concerned, electroporation a la E. coli is fairly effective..  we have
> a protocol or two if you're interested.
> 
> Matt Vaughn
> 
> 
Yes, I am interested. Can you possibly send me the vector?

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 09 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!news-peer.gip.net!news-lond.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!peer.news.u-net.net!u-net!news.u-net.com!not-for-mail
From: arnoud@vanvliet.u-net.com (Arnoud van Vliet)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: His-tagged protein and SDS-PAGE migration
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 16:43:37 GMT
Organization: (Posted Via) U-NET Ltd.
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <35056d1f.799515@news.u-net.com>
References: <350540de.110595@news.columbia.edu>
Reply-To: arnoud@vanvliet.u-net.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: p112.nas2.is3.u-net.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230

Hi,

I don't know the system, but if it is a 6-His system, then it can run
a bit higher on SDS-PAGE. My 10 and 14 kDa proteins (low histidine
content) ran at 16 and 20 kDa, respectively. However, there are
exceptions to the rule, as a third protein I expressed (high histidine
content) ran at the expected MW.

So summarizing: yes, up to 6 kDa higher (consult the QiaExpress manual
from Qiagen).

Hope this helps
Arnoud


On Tue, 10 Mar 1998 13:33:45 GMT, ct133@columbia.edu wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Does anybody know whether his-tagged protein expressed from pRSET
>vector (Invitrogen) can migrate aberrantly on SDS-PAGE? 
>
>Thanks,
>
>C. Tunyaplin


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 09 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!news.new-york.net!news.columbia.edu!news-not-for-mail
From: ct133@columbia.edu
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: His-tagged protein and SDS-PAGE migration
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 13:33:45 GMT
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <350540de.110595@news.columbia.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tw116cct.cpmc.columbia.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.478

Hi,

Does anybody know whether his-tagged protein expressed from pRSET
vector (Invitrogen) can migrate aberrantly on SDS-PAGE? 

Thanks,

C. Tunyaplin

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 09 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!newsfeed.nacamar.de!fu-berlin.de!news.tu-darmstadt.de!News.Uni-Marburg.DE!not-for-mail
From: Marco Bocola <bocola@mailer.uni-marburg.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: E280 Protein quantitation on microplates ?!
Date: 10 Mar 1998 19:22:11 GMT
Organization: HRZ Uni Marburg
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <35059283.FB7F6CF3@mailer.uni-marburg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc1661.pharmazie.uni-marburg.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (WinNT; I)

We build up a new biochemical workgroup and looking foorward to by an
UV/VIS-Microplate Reader.
Has anyone experience with UV-Microplates and especially Protein
determination ?
(Unfortunately we have no "normal" UV/VIS Photometer)
Is it possible to measure quantitative absorption with good accuracy for
small volumes?

Thank you for telling me your experiences or suggestions,
Marco Bocola

--
Marco Bocola                                           Inst. f. pharmaz.
Chemistry
                                                                 AG
Prof. Klebe
Tel: +49-6421-28-5071                            Marbacher Weg 6
Fax:                     -8994                            D-35032
Marburg

NEW !!!  e-mail:bocola@mailer.uni-marburg.de  NEW !!!

:-( There are no problems, just solutions !? :-)



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 09 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!STUDENT1.MAHIDOL.AC.TH!g3937506
From: g3937506@STUDENT1.MAHIDOL.AC.TH (Jongrak Kittiworakarn)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re:Gigapite Column
Date: 10 Mar 1998 19:13:54 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 23
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3505FFB0.C6F2F34D@student.mahidol.ac.th>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hi Benjamin:

Gigapite is hydroxy apatite, Ca18 (PO4)6 (OH)2.
You may contact TOAGOSEI CHEMICAL INDUSTRY CO., LTD>
14-1 Nishi Shinbashi,  1-chome, Minoto-ku, Tokyo 105 JAPAN
Tel: 03-597-7739
Fax: 03-597-7217

Hope this help,
Jongrak

--
-----------------------------------Mr. Jongrak Kittiworakarn
                                   g3937506@student.mahidol.ac.th

     Inst. of Science and Technology for Research and Development
     Mahidol University (Salaya Campus)
     Salaya, Nokornprathom, THAILAND.
     Tel. 001-66-2-441-9003-7 ext.1277,1278,1279
     Fax. 001-66-2-441-9906, 001-66-2-441-1013
-----------------------------------------------------------------



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 09 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!news.new-york.net!news.columbia.edu!news-not-for-mail
From: ct133@columbia.edu
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: His-tagged protein and SDS-PAGE migration
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 01:18:06 GMT
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <3505e5df.560449@news.columbia.edu>
References: <350540de.110595@news.columbia.edu> <35056d1f.799515@news.u-net.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tw116cct.cpmc.columbia.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.478

>I don't know the system, but if it is a 6-His system, then it can run
>a bit higher on SDS-PAGE. My 10 and 14 kDa proteins (low histidine
>content) ran at 16 and 20 kDa, respectively. However, there are
>exceptions to the rule, as a third protein I expressed (high histidine
>content) ran at the expected MW.
>
>So summarizing: yes, up to 6 kDa higher (consult the QiaExpress manual
>from Qiagen).

The tag should be about 6 kD. My protein is 64 kD so I'm expecting a
70 kD protein. But what I saw on the gel runs at ~90 kD. This is a bit
too much to be explained by the tag, isn't it?

C. Tunyaplin

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!TC3NET.COM!cola
From: cola@TC3NET.COM (cola)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: growth hormone
Date: 11 Mar 1998 15:13:36 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 4
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <35071AB3.C910BBBB@tc3net.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

I have isolate a putative growth hormone and would like to test my
sample for activity.  Does anyone know of a cell line or other test that
would confirm the sample as being growth hormone? Thanks Cola


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!axisgenetics.co.uk!KH
From: KH@axisgenetics.co.uk (Koen Hellendoorn)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: C-terminal protein sequencing
Date: 11 Mar 1998 03:10:35 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 8
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <c=GB%a=_%p=Axis_Genetics_pl%l=POST-OFFICE-980311102512Z-265@axisgen.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hello,

Can anyone tell me if there is any institute or company (preferably in
the UK/ other Europe) that can do C-terminal sequencing of proteins? 

Thanks,

Koen

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.software
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!chicago-news-feed2.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news-peer.gip.net!news-lond.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!peer.news.u-net.net!u-net!yama.mcc.ac.uk!liv!news
From: GcR <gcr@liv.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Proposal for a new bionet newsgroup
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <35066A66.2B70@liv.ac.uk>
Sender: news@liverpool.ac.uk (News System)
NNTP-Posting-Host: ash-35.liv.ac.uk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: The University of Liverpool
References: <6dobf1$4cj$1@gwsun.medinf.mu-luebeck.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 10:41:42 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.02 (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4c)
Lines: 30
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:65689 bionet.molbio.proteins:12426 bionet.software:20692

Lars Komorowski wrote:
> 
> I propose to set up a new newsgroup for used lab euipment. Who is interested
> ?
> Lars Komorowski
> Ins. f. Biochemie
> Med. Univ. Luebeck, Germany



As I can recall, a few months ago somebody came up with a similar idea,
he made a webpage specially for the (re)sale of used lab equipment. You
can find it at http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Lab/5656/

Sincerely,

GcR

 
---------------------------------------------\/-----
Gert Roosen                                  /\ 
PhD Student                                 /--\
Department of Haematology                  (====\
Royal Liverpool University Hospital         \----)
Duncan Building 2nd floor                    \--/
Prescot Street L69 3BX Liverpool              \/
+ 44 (0)151 706 4326 (phone)                  /\ 
+ 44 (0)151 706 4311 (fax)                   /--\  
g.roosen@liv.ac.uk   (email)                /====)
-------------------------------------------(----/---

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!152.163.199.19!portc03.blue.aol.com!audrey01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: alpies@aol.com (AlPiEs)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: is it the same protein?
Date: 11 Mar 1998 13:16:12 GMT
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <19980311131600.IAA08911@ladder03.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder03.news.aol.com
X-Admin: news@aol.com
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com

We are studying a human protein that we suspect has a tendency to aggregate in 
vivo. After size exclusion chromatography and Western blot analysis of the
fractions with polyclonal antibodies,there are two strong signals: one in the
first fraction, and one in later fraction. Presumably the first fraction
contains an aggregated form of the protein.  My question is: how do we show
that the protein present in both fractions is the same? We do not want to rely
on the antibodies only, and we cannot do microsequencing, the amounts are too
low. Limited proteolysis is not agood idea either if it is the same protein in
different conformations. Any suggestions, please?

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!ruf.uni-freiburg.de!frnicole
From: frnicole@ruf.uni-freiburg.de (Nicole Frankenberg)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Svedberg units
Date: 11 Mar 1998 03:39:03 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 4
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <350685CF.87B75362@sun2.ruf.uni-freiburg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Does anybbody know where to get svedberg units for standard proteins.
any idea of a book or article is appreciated.
Thanks for your help.Nicole


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsgate.duke.edu!nntp-out.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.news.xara.net!xara.net!server5.netnews.ja.net!server3.netnews.ja.net!news.icnet!NewsWatcher!user
From: I.McFarlane@icrf.icnet.uk (Ian McFarlane)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: is it the same protein?
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 17:58:17 +0000
Organization: Imperial Cancer Research Fund
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <I.McFarlane-1103981758170001@143.65.52.61>
References: <19980311131600.IAA08911@ladder03.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 143.65.52.61

If you run SDS-PAGE with mercaptoethanol you should only get one band on
your Western. If this doesn't work, some protein complexes will resist the
treatment urea can be added to the sample buffer and gel. 

Ian Mc



In article <19980311131600.IAA08911@ladder03.news.aol.com>, alpies@aol.com
(AlPiEs) wrote:

> We are studying a human protein that we suspect has a tendency to
aggregate in 
> vivo. After size exclusion chromatography and Western blot analysis of the
> fractions with polyclonal antibodies,there are two strong signals: one in the
> first fraction, and one in later fraction. Presumably the first fraction
> contains an aggregated form of the protein.  My question is: how do we show
> that the protein present in both fractions is the same? We do not want to rely
> on the antibodies only, and we cannot do microsequencing, the amounts are too
> low. Limited proteolysis is not agood idea either if it is the same protein in
> different conformations. Any suggestions, please?

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!newshub.northeast.verio.net!nntp.upenn.edu!msunews!not-for-mail
From: Jonathan Walton <walton@pilot.msu.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: carbon content of proteins?
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 11:34:29 -0500
Organization: Michigan State University
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <3506BD15.5F0F@pilot.msu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 35.8.197.111
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
X-MD5: 859d1742a9f46ed064e94ba21b450691

Can anyone tell me a generally accepted average value for the % (by
weight) of carbon in proteins?  The value of 15-16% for N is generally
used, but how about carbon?  And (related question that would give the
answer) is there is a program that will calculate the elemental
composition of a protein?
Thanks,

Jon Walton
Michigan State Univ.
walton@pilot.msu.edu

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.wli.net!newsfeed.ecrc.net!newsfeed.ecrc.net!news.duesseldorf.ecrc.net!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!usenet
From: "Prof. Dr. Dietmar Schomburg" <D.Schomburg@uni-koeln.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Conference in Bioinformatics
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 10:33:43 +0100
Organization: Universitaet zu Koeln
Lines: 198
Message-ID: <35065A77.9E9F9E07@uni-koeln.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.95.151.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [de] (Win95; I)

GCB 98, Conference on Bioinformatics
FIRST ANNOUNCEMENT AND CALL FOR PAPERS
COMPUTER SCIENCE AND BIOLOGY
German Conference on
BIOINFORMATICS
GCB '98
Cologne University
October 7-10, 1998

              University of Cologne, Institute of Biochemistry
              German Society for Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
(GBM)
              German Society for Computer Science (GI)
              German Society of Chemistry (GDCh)
              German Society for Chemical Apparatus, Chemical
Engineering
              and Biotechnology (DECHEMA)
              German Society for Medical Informatics, Biometry and
              Epidemiology (GMDS)

The conference focuses on the following topics:
* Comprehensive Genome Analysis
* Comparative Genome Analysis
* Protein Structure and Function
* Drug and Protein Design
* Simulation of biological Molecules
* Gene and Target Discovery
* Sequence Data Analysis
* Sequence/Structure/Function Relations
* Evolution of Genomes
* Intelligent Biological Databases
* Software for Genome Analysis

ORGANIZING COMMITTEE:
D. Schomburg (U Koeln) Chair + U. Lessel (U Koeln)

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE:
T. Lengauer (GMD St. Augustin), W. Mewes (MIPS, Martinsried), D.
Schomburg (Univ. Koeln), M. Vingron (DKFZ Heidelberg), E. Wingender
(GBF, Braunschweig)

The German Conference on Bioinformatics (GCB-98) will present the state
of the art in Molecular Bioinformatics. It is an international
conference within the tradition of the German Workshop 'Computers in
Bioscience' created more than 10 years ago. GCB'98 focuses on the
bioinformatics support research in the modern molecular biosciences.
The conference will present the current research in the theory and
application of computational methods to genomic, sequence, and
structural information. The conference language is English.

Participation is invited from the scientific community active in the
development of concepts and applications to the evaluation of genomic
information, analysis and prediction of protein structure, and design of
drugs and proteins. Submissions in the form of full papers or extended
abstracts (ca. three pages) for lectures, or abstracts (1-2 pages) for
posters and demos should reflect recent work to be presented to an
audience of interested scientists and industrial researchers.

Selected papers and presentations are rigorously peer reviewed and are
published in a special issue of CABIOS. The scientific committee will
evaluate submissions and recommend papers for publication in CABIOS.
These manuscripts are subject to the ordinary CABIOS review procedure (3
referees).

A special section for the demonstration of software in form of a plenary
session will adjourn the conference.

Full Papers should be 12 pages, single-spaced and set in 12 point type,
including title, abstract, figures, tables, and bibliography.
Submissions to be considered for CABIOS publication must follow authors
instructions of that journal. Poster and software demonstration
abstracts should be max. 2 pages. Postal and electronic mailing
addresses, telephone, and fax numbers must be included. Processing of
submissions is facilitated by sending postscript files via e-mail to
D.Schomburg@uni-koeln.de

The conference takes place in a beautiful historical place,
Kardinal-Schulte-Haus. The castle-like conference centre is surrounded
by a park and located at the outskirts of a hilly area near Cologne and
overlooking the city and its environment. Access from the Cologne main
station or international airports Koeln/Bonn or Duesseldorf  is
convenient (ca. 30 min. from Cologne central station). Accommodation is
provided in the conference centre or, after the rooms in the
Kardinal-Schulte-Haus are booked, in a nearby hotel. The number of
participants is limited to 200. Please make your reservation as soon as
possible. Speakers and presenters of accepted posters will have
preference, all other places will be given in order of the reception of
the registration.

For more, up-to-date information see our WWW Page:

http://www.uni-koeln.de/math-nat-fak/biochemie/GCB98.htm

DEADLINES:
for Abstracts or extended Abstracts: June 30.
for Registration August 31.

REGISTRATION FORM:

Name/Title:
..............................................................................................................

First Name:
..............................................................................................................

Organisation:
..............................................................................................................

Organisation:
..............................................................................................................

Street:
..............................................................................................................

City:
..............................................................................................................

Phone:
..............................................................................................................

FAX:
..............................................................................................................

E-mail:
..............................................................................................................

Signature, if faxed

Please delete as appropriate:

  I would like to submit an abstract for consideration as a
Lecture/Poster

  Please reserve accomodation for the nights of October 7/8/9/10 (delete
as appropriate)

in single/double room (preferred partner?)

  Full Registration:  DM 250

  Students:  DM 200

  I enclose a cheque/transfer the money before September 15th

RETURN TO:
GCB 98 Secretariate
Universitaet zu Koeln
Institut fuer Biochemie
Zuelpicher Strasse 47
50674 Koeln
FAX +49 221/470-5092
E-Mail: D.Schomburg@uni-koeln.de

Full accomodation includes rooms and meals for accomodation in the
conference centre. We will handle your reservation. Please do not make
advance payments for the accomodation.

Single Room:  DM 276 for 3 days
Double Room:  DM 228 for 3 days per person

For registration please send a cheque payable to:

GCB 98 Bioinformatics

For more information contact:
     Ms. Sullivan
     Tel.: +49 221/470 6440
     FAX : +49 221/470 5092
     e-mail: Sullivan@uni-koeln.de

ACCESS TO COLOGNE
Cologne is served by a number of international airports including
Cologne/Bonn, Duesseldorf, Frankfurt and even Amsterdam and Brussels.
From Cologne/Bonn Airport, busses run every 15- 20 minutes to the city
centre. From Duesseldorf there is a regular train service to the Main
Station (Hauptbahnhof) in the centre of Cologne. From Frankfurt there is
a train via Bonn to the main station in Cologne. Journey time is 2
hours). Good rail links also exist between Amsterdam and Brussels and
Cologne.

The central Euopean location of Cologne means that it can be easily
reached by the major highways from the Netherlands, Belgium, France,
Switzerland, Italy, Austria and Eastern Europe. The main highways are
A1, 3, 4, 54, 57, and 61.

Built on the banks of the Rhine River, Cologne is a beautiful historic
city in the heart of Europe. Cologne has an immense cultural heritage,
including many relics of the Roman city, both in museums and at their
original sites. With the Dom Cathedral, twelve Romanesque churches, the
medieval treasures of "holy Cologne", galleries of modern and
avant-garde art, Cologne offers one of Europe's greatest art
collections. The Opera, Playhouse, Cologne Philharmonia and more than
100 smaller theatres and cultural institutions ensure Cologne has a
cultural present besides its past.





From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.starnet.net!sdd.hp.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.erols.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!guardian.dcs.warwick.ac.uk!warwick!leicester!usenet
From: "Dr E. Buxbaum" <EB15@le.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: is it the same protein?
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 14:04:05 -0800
Organization: University of Leicester (PCFS User)
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <35070A55.6DAA@le.ac.uk>
References: <19980311131600.IAA08911@ladder03.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc47.msb.le.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win16; I)

AlPiEs wrote:
> 
> We are studying a human protein that we suspect has a tendency to aggregate in
> vivo. After size exclusion chromatography and Western blot analysis of the
> fractions with polyclonal antibodies,there are two strong signals: one in the
> first fraction, and one in later fraction. Presumably the first fraction
> contains an aggregated form of the protein.  My question is: how do we show
> that the protein present in both fractions is the same? We do not want to rely
> on the antibodies only, and we cannot do microsequencing, the amounts are too
> low. Limited proteolysis is not agood idea either if it is the same protein in
> different conformations. Any suggestions, please?

2D electrophoresis. The probability that two different proteins have the
same subunit MW, the same pI and react with the same antibody should be
very low indeed.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!guardian.dcs.warwick.ac.uk!warwick!leicester!usenet
From: "Dr E. Buxbaum" <EB15@le.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: E280 Protein quantitation on microplates ?!
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 13:57:05 -0800
Organization: University of Leicester (PCFS User)
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <350708B1.F51@le.ac.uk>
References: <35059283.FB7F6CF3@mailer.uni-marburg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc47.msb.le.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win16; I)

Marco Bocola wrote:
> 
> We build up a new biochemical workgroup and looking foorward to by an
> UV/VIS-Microplate Reader.
> Has anyone experience with UV-Microplates and especially Protein
> determination ?
> (Unfortunately we have no "normal" UV/VIS Photometer)
> Is it possible to measure quantitative absorption with good accuracy for
> small volumes?

The first problem here is not the reader, but the plate, because normal
96 well plates are made of polystyrene, which has considerable (read:
almost total) absorbance at 280 nm. Even if you could get plates made of
polyacryl, the absorbance probably will be some 50 or 60%. Additionally,
I do not know of a 96 well photometer which were able to produce light
of such short a wavelength (you need a mercury or xenon arc bulb, not
the normal tungsten filament lamps). You should be able to get that
information from the specs of the instrument you want to buy, however. 

To measure A280 for small samples, we use a submicro quarz cuvette
together with our Beckman DU-65 spectrophotometer. The minimal volume
with this setup is 50 ul, the cuvette can acomodate up to 100 ul, the
pathlength is 1 cm as for normal cuvettes. We use a "crystall" tip
connected to a vacuum line to empty the cuvette between readings, the
cuvette remains in the instrument. The speed is of course lower than
with 96 well plates, but you can still read 3-4 samples per min if you
are experienced. This system works very well for Warburg protein
assays.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newscore.univie.ac.at!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!guardian.dcs.warwick.ac.uk!warwick!leicester!usenet
From: "Dr E. Buxbaum" <EB15@le.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Svedberg units
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 14:01:09 -0800
Organization: University of Leicester (PCFS User)
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <350709A5.1F76@le.ac.uk>
References: <350685CF.87B75362@sun2.ruf.uni-freiburg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc47.msb.le.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win16; I)

Nicole Frankenberg wrote:
> 
> Does anybbody know where to get svedberg units for standard proteins.
> any idea of a book or article is appreciated.

Analytical ultracentrifugation is a first principle technique, you do
not need standard proteins for calibration. However, you should get
examples from most books on ultracentrifugation. There is one in the
"Practical Approach" series, and Svedbergs "The Ultracentrifuges" is
still worth reading, even after 50 years.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.wli.net!news-xfer.netaxs.com!howland.erols.net!psinntp!ix.netcom.com!news
From: Mark Atlas <mark118@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Online Auctions for used lab equipment Going, Going...Sold!!!
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 15:08:43 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <6e69cq$2ca@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sjx-ca72-24.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Mar 11  9:08:10 AM CST 1998
X-Newsreader: NETCOMplete/4.0

Online Auctions for used lab equipment Going, Going...Sold!!!

Purchasing used equipment has never been easier or more safe.  With Going, Going,...Sold!!! 

You Set the Price
You evaluate the equipment in your lab before taking ownership
You utilize a predeisigned escrow to insure your money
You find great prices
You get knowledgeable unbiased assistance to guide you with your purchase


Items on the block include

Beckman 6300
Waters HPLC systems ( 30%-40% of new price for a new model Detector, Unbelievable)
Waters GPC system
Varian 3400 GC
Centrifuges

Many new items coming up weekly. Stop buy and register for free.

http://www.going-going-sold.com





From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!chicago-news-feed2.bbnplanet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-ge.switch.ch!surfnet.nl!rl0001.unimaas.nl!not-for-mail
From: "Henri M.H. Spronk" <henri.spronk@bioch.unimaas.nl>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Expression problems
Date: 11 Mar 1998 14:15:28 GMT
Organization: RL
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <01bd4cf8$2a1ebda0$2d187889@henri>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bioch0045uns50.unimaas.nl
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161

We are trying to express a eukaryotic cDNA in a prokaryotic expression
system. The E. coli strain is M15 [pREP4] from QIAgen. The pQE40 expression
vector consist of 6His-mouseDHFR and our cDNA (220 bp). Between the
mouseDHFR and the cDNA we placed a factor Xa-digestion site. In the
beginning we had poor expression. At one moment, however, we obtained very
good expression. We always used the same glycerolstock which is defreezed
before used. So repeated freezing and defreezing of the bacteria seems to
result in better expression. Does anybody understand this? 

After changing the Xa-site (4 aa) into AspPro (2 aa) expression is again
very low. We tried already lower expression temperature and different
incubation times. Repeated freezing and defreezing didn't result in a
better expression. Can someone help us?

Thanks in advance,

Henri M.H. Spronk
Department of Biochemistry
University Maastricht
henri.spronk@bioch.unimaas.nl

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Mar 10 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!uthct.edu!shaun
From: shaun@uthct.edu (Shaun D. Black)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Svedberg units
Date: 11 Mar 1998 07:16:51 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 24
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <9803111515.AA24912@athena.uthct.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Greetings All,

     Nicole Frankenberg wrote...

>Does anybbody know where to get svedberg units for standard proteins.
>any idea of a book or article is appreciated.
>Thanks for your help.Nicole

Check the CRC Handbook of Biochemistry (tables of thousands of protein
S20,w and D20,w values); the tables I have are from the 2nd Edition (1970)
in Section C.  You might also look at current biochem textbooks, as many
of them list some values for well-known proteins.  I hope this helps you.


Best regards,

Shaun Black

  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  = Shaun D. Black, PhD   | Internet e-mail address:   shaun@uthct.edu  =
  = Dept. of Biochemistry | University of Texas Health Center at Tyler  =
  = Tyler, TX  75710      | World Wide Web:       http://www.uthct.edu  =
  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Mar 11 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!server1.netnews.ja.net!news.nott.ac.uk!NewsWatcher!user
From: kevin.bailey@nottingham.ac.uk ()
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: C-terminal protein sequencing
Followup-To: bionet.molbio.proteins
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 13:17:02 +0100
Organization: Cripps Computing Centre, The University of Nottingham
Lines: 17
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <kevin.bailey-120398131703@128.243.183.238>
References: <c=GB%a=_%p=Axis_Genetics_pl%l=POST-OFFICE-980311102512Z-265@axisgen.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpbjwk1.biochem.nottingham.ac.uk

In article
<c=GB%a=_%p=Axis_Genetics_pl%l=POST-OFFICE-980311102512Z-265@axisgen.demon.co.uk>,
KH@axisgenetics.co.uk (Koen Hellendoorn) wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Can anyone tell me if there is any institute or company (preferably in
> the UK/ other Europe) that can do C-terminal sequencing of proteins? 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Koen

		At one time Hewlett Packard were acting as intermediaries and taking
C-term samples to demonstrate their sequencer, not sure if this is still
the case though. Try contacting HP UK. At one time there was a service at
the University of Michigan, again not clear if this still runs.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Mar 11 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!server1.netnews.ja.net!news.nott.ac.uk!NewsWatcher!user
From: kevin.bailey@nottingham.ac.uk ()
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Online Auctions for used lab equipment Going, Going...Sold!!!
Followup-To: bionet.molbio.proteins
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 13:23:55 +0100
Organization: Cripps Computing Centre, The University of Nottingham
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <kevin.bailey-120398132355@128.243.183.238>
References: <6e69cq$2ca@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpbjwk1.biochem.nottingham.ac.uk

In article <6e69cq$2ca@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>, Mark Atlas
<mark118@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> Many new items coming up weekly. Stop buy and register for free.
> 
> http://www.going-going-sold.com


			Note for UK/European labs: last time I checked this site it was *only*
available to US sites. 

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Mar 11 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.wli.net!feed2.news.erols.com!erols!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!newsfeed.nacamar.de!fu-berlin.de!news-ber1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.tu-bs.de!rzlimes.gbf-braunschweig.de!not-for-mail
From: kaerst@gbf.de (Uwe Kaerst)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: E280 Protein quantitation on microplates ?!
Date: 12 Mar 1998 12:29:34 GMT
Organization: GBF
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <6e8kfe$1tv$1@rzlimes.gbf-braunschweig.de>
References: <35059283.FB7F6CF3@mailer.uni-marburg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: etnuka.gbf-braunschweig.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.8 (x86 32bit)

In article <35059283.FB7F6CF3@mailer.uni-marburg.de>, 
bocola@mailer.uni-marburg.de says...
>
>We build up a new biochemical workgroup and looking foorward to by an
>UV/VIS-Microplate Reader.
>Has anyone experience with UV-Microplates and especially Protein
>determination ?
>(Unfortunately we have no "normal" UV/VIS Photometer)
>Is it possible to measure quantitative absorption with good accuracy for
>small volumes?
>
>Thank you for telling me your experiences or suggestions,
>Marco Bocola
>
>--
>Marco Bocola                                           Inst. f. pharmaz.
>Chemistry
>                                                                 AG
>Prof. Klebe
>Tel: +49-6421-28-5071                            Marbacher Weg 6
>Fax:                     -8994                            D-35032
>Marburg
>
>NEW !!!  e-mail:bocola@mailer.uni-marburg.de  NEW !!!
>
>:-( There are no problems, just solutions !? :-)
>
>


Molecular Dynamics offers a SpectraMax 250 Reader that goes down to
250 nm. Plates are also available, and we use this routinely and
find it very reliable. Hope this helps (and NO AFFILIATION, of cause!)

Uwe

-- 
Uwe Kaerst
Dept. Enzymology
GBF  - Gesellschaft fuer Biotechnologische Forschung
Mascheroder Weg 1
D-38124 Braunscheig, Germany
Tel:  +(49) 531 6181 318
Fax: +(49) 531 2612313
EMAIL: kaerst@gbf-braunschweig.de
          
-- Disclaimer --
Standard > Keyword : Opinions, my own, nobody else's, no affiliation, 
whatsoever ...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
"It is a mistake to allow any mechanical object to realize that you are in a 
hurry !"


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Mar 11 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!europa.clark.net!164.67.42.145!awabi.library.ucla.edu!128.120.8.185!mark.ucdavis.edu.MISMATCH!news.ucdavis.edu!not-for-mail
From: Jim Kami <jakami@ucdavis.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.software
Subject: Re: Proposal for a new bionet newsgroup
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 08:38:56 -0800
Organization: University of California, Davis
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <35080FA0.2886@ucdavis.edu>
References: <6dobf1$4cj$1@gwsun.medinf.mu-luebeck.de> <35066A66.2B70@liv.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: reqd-091.ucdavis.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (Win95; I)
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:65739 bionet.molbio.proteins:12443 bionet.software:20708

Try   sci.chem.labware  for used equipment. 

Jim Kami
Blue Rose Biotech



GcR wrote:
> 
> Lars Komorowski wrote:
> >
> > I propose to set up a new newsgroup for used lab euipment. Who is interested
> > ?
> > Lars Komorowski
> > Ins. f. Biochemie
> > Med. Univ. Luebeck, Germany
> 
> As I can recall, a few months ago somebody came up with a similar idea,
> he made a webpage specially for the (re)sale of used lab equipment. You
> can find it at http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Lab/5656/
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> GcR
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------\/-----
> Gert Roosen                                  /\
> PhD Student                                 /--\
> Department of Haematology                  (====\
> Royal Liverpool University Hospital         \----)
> Duncan Building 2nd floor                    \--/
> Prescot Street L69 3BX Liverpool              \/
> + 44 (0)151 706 4326 (phone)                  /\
> + 44 (0)151 706 4311 (fax)                   /--\
> g.roosen@liv.ac.uk   (email)                /====)
> -------------------------------------------(----/---

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Mar 11 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!hecate.umd.edu!not-for-mail
From: Hongyu Zhang <hyzhang@carb.nist.gov>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Active site residue
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 14:50:34 -0500
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <35083C8A.41C6@carb.nist.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tabasco.carb.nist.gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01SGoldC-SGI (X11; I; IRIX64 6.4 IP30)

Dear Molecular Biologists,


I have a bit of knowledge that it's only possible for some specific
amino acids to form the active sites of proteins. Can anyone enumerate
all the possible resiude types?

Thanks !

Hongyu
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Hongyu Zhang, Ph.D.          | Tel:  (301) 738-6117 (w)   ^/..\^   
CARB, University of Maryland |       (301) 987-0179 (h) -m( 00 )m-
9600 Gudelsky Drive          | Fax:  (301) 738-6255
Rockville, Maryland 20850    | Email: hyzhang@carb.nist.gov
           URL: http://indigo5.carb.nist.gov/~hyzhang
------------------------------------------------------------------

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Mar 11 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!CLEMSON.EDU!walkerc
From: walkerc@CLEMSON.EDU ("Caroline J. Walker")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: FPLC
Date: 12 Mar 1998 06:30:48 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 11
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <v03102800b12d5a96b1e5@[130.127.44.61]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

We are buying an FPLC and are comparing the Biorad Biologic system with the
Pharmacia FPLC system.  There are some small differences on the specs and
the prices are about the same so we could use either. What I would like to
hear is if anyone has feedback on how easy either of these systems is to
use.  Is the Pharmacia software (OS/2) OK, or is the Windows 95 with the
Biorad better?  How are the leaks? Design faults?? Reliability? Service?
	Would be happy to hear any comments.
Thanks,
Caroline



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Mar 11 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!CLEMSON.EDU!walkerc
From: walkerc@CLEMSON.EDU ("Caroline J. Walker")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: is it the same protein
Date: 12 Mar 1998 10:15:08 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 12
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <v03102800b12d8d0e90be@[130.127.44.61]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Can you take your high mw fraction off the gel filtration column,
concentrate it and run it through again - see if you generate lower mw
monomers from it i.e. you may be able to promote some futher dissociation
of the aggregated form.  I got a similar kind of result with a protein, and
found that the Mg concentration was critical in determining the level of
aggregation (in its absence it ran as monomers).
	 The other possibility you may consider is that in crude preps it
is possible that your protein may be associating with other proteins rather
than just itself e.g. if its a part of a metabolon or other large complex
(even if this association is loose).



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Mar 12 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.wli.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!193.174.75.126!news-was.dfn.de!news-kar1.dfn.de!hades.rz.uni-sb.de!ukmhg03.med-hg.uni-sb.de!user
From: hgtsei@med-rz.uni-sb.de (Thomas Seib)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: FPLC
Date: 13 Mar 1998 15:04:16 GMT
Organization: University of Saarland, Computing Center, Germany.
Lines: 36
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <hgtsei-1303981608500001@ukmhg03.med-hg.uni-sb.de>
References: <v03102800b12d5a96b1e5@[130.127.44.61]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ukmhg03.med-hg.uni-sb.de

In article <v03102800b12d5a96b1e5@[130.127.44.61]>, walkerc@CLEMSON.EDU
("Caroline J. Walker") wrote:

> We are buying an FPLC and are comparing the Biorad Biologic system with the
> Pharmacia FPLC system.  There are some small differences on the specs and
> the prices are about the same so we could use either. What I would like to
> hear is if anyone has feedback on how easy either of these systems is to
> use.  Is the Pharmacia software (OS/2) OK, or is the Windows 95 with the
> Biorad better?  How are the leaks? Design faults?? Reliability? Service?
>         Would be happy to hear any comments.
> Thanks,
> Caroline

We had to make the same decision and finally bought the Pharmacia
FPLC system. The main reason was in my hands, that the BioRad pump
was very sensible to air bubbles trapped, just like a HPLC
system, resulting in strong pulsation of the UV monitor baseline.
Hence, you have to degas buffer solutions very thoroughly
before use. This may be feasible, but sometimes it is of advantage
to apply a large-volume sample via the pump, and then it is very
problematic to degas because of possible denaturation of the proteins.
I also found it very cumbersome to remove air bubbles from the pump
once they were trapped.
With the Pharmacia system, air bubbles are no problem at all. I never
degas any solution. It works very reliable.
The only disadvantage is the computer software running under OS/2,
which is a dying platform and of no use for other purposes. However,
Windows3.1 is also installed and most programs run without problems.
 I hope this helps.

Matthias

-- 
Thomas Seib
Kantstr. 12
66292 Riegelsberg

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Mar 12 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.cc.ukans.edu!not-for-mail
From: PGegen@RNAworld.edu (Dr. Peter Gegenheimer)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: FPLC
Date: 14 Mar 1998 03:35:18 GMT
Organization: Univ. Kansas (Biochemistry)
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <7opiGDf98QgB-pn2-O54PednwKmWS@rnaworld.bio.ukans.edu>
References: <v03102800b12d5a96b1e5@[130.127.44.61]> <hgtsei-1303981608500001@ukmhg03.med-hg.uni-sb.de
Reply-To: PGegen@RNAworld.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: rnaworld.bio.ukans.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Newsreader: ProNews/2 Version 1.00

On Fri, 13 Mar 1998 15:04:16, hgtsei@med-rz.uni-sb.de (Thomas Seib) 
wrote:

> In article <v03102800b12d5a96b1e5@[130.127.44.61]>, walkerc@CLEMSON.EDU
> ("Caroline J. Walker") wrote:
> 
> With the Pharmacia system, air bubbles are no problem at all. I never
> degas any solution. It works very reliable.
> The only disadvantage is the computer software running under OS/2,
> which is a dying platform and of no use for other purposes. However,
> Windows3.1 is also installed and most programs run without problems.

Oops! OS/2 is definitely NOT a dying platform. 

  First, It is a non-Windows platform in a Windows world. There are 
as many OS/2 users as Mac users, but the OS/2 users are all in the 
large corporations which IBM somehow prefers to deal with. OS/2 is 
also the second-best-selling network OS for the Intel processor 
(behind Windows NT). IBM aggressively markets & develops OS/2, just 
not to individual users. OS/2 uses a dynamic desktop like the Mac, 
but with real object-orientation (unlike Mac or Windows). 

  Second, OS/2 is a _complete_ operating environment; you can do 
virtually anything with it more easily than with Win95. (Its only 
competitor is WinNT.) For example, I use a native OS/2 word 
processor, spreadsheet (better than any Win?? app), graphics apps, 
network & internet apps. I also use a few Win3.1 and DOS apps for 
which there are no substitutes (not for the Mac, either). My web 
site is maintained & run on the OS/2 PC we use in our lab. Also, 
don't forget that the LICOR DNA sequencer uses OS/2 to collect and 
interpret sequence data from multiple gels simultaneously.

  Third, you are right in that IBM does not plan to support Win95 or
NT programs under OS/2. However, some of the best Windows NT 
software was developed on OS/2 and ported to NT. Finally, OS/2 is 
one of the few OS's with built-in support for Java programs (i.e. it
runs Java without a browser), and will support--for example--the 
Java Molecular Biology Workbench. 

  Basically, the OS should be the least of your worries 
  

o-------------------------------------------------------------------
--o
| Dr. Peter Gegenheimer       |  Vox: 785-864-3939  FAX: 
785-864-5321 |
| Departments of Biochemistry |    PGegen@UKans.edu                 
 |
|  and of Botany              |    http://RNAworld.Bio.UKans.edu/   
 |
|                             |                                     
 |
| University of Kansas        |                                     
 |
| 2045 Haworth Hall           |  "The sleep of reason produces      
 |
| Lawrence  KS  66045-2106    |   monsters."                  Goya  
 |
o_____________________________|_____________________________________
__o 

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Mar 12 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.kornet.nm.kr!news.maxwell.syr.edu!howland.erols.net!feed1.news.erols.com!winter.news.erols.com!not-for-mail
From: Joan Evans <j.evans@scienceboard.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Restriction enzymes study
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 09:19:21 +0000
Organization: Erol's Internet Services
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <3508FA19.19E4@scienceboard.net>
Reply-To: j.evans@scienceboard.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207-172-57-115.s115.tnt2.ann.erols.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: winter.news.erols.com 889798519 17402 207.172.57.115 (13 Mar 1998 14:15:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@erols.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.02Gold (Macintosh; I; PPC)

The use of restriction enzymes is an essential component of molecular
biology research.  While there appears to be little variation in quality
from one vendor to another, the price of restriction enzymes varies
considerably.

The Science Advisory Board (http://www.scienceboard.net) will soon begin
a series of studies on restriction enzymes.  The goal of these studies
is to better understand the preferences, expectations and unmet needs of
molecular biologists, especially as they relate to reliability,
selection, and packaging.

The Science Advisory Board is a worldwide panel of more than 3,000
scientific experts that convenes electronically to participate in online
surveys and focus groups to voice their opinions on a wide variety of
topics related to new research products and emerging technologies.

In order to participate in these and future studies, it is first
necessary to complete the registration form which can be found at
http://www.scienceboard.net.  Registrants with appropriate backgrounds
will be notified shortly thereafter.  All responses are held in strict
confidence, and participants will be compensated for their time.

Joan Evans
Membership Secretary
The Science Advisory Board
http://www.scienceboard.net

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Mar 12 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!internet!biosci!not-for-mail
From: biohelp (BIOSCI Administrator)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: BIOSCI/bionet miniFAQ & Fundraiser
Date: 13 Mar 1998 02:00:08 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 233
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199803131000.CAA21027@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

(LAST REVISION: 30-JUL-95)

This BIOSCI "miniFAQ" is designed to answer the questions that come up
the *most frequently*.  The main BIOSCI FAQ (Frequently Asked
Questions) is accessible on the World Wide Web at URL
http://www.bio.net/.

If you can not find an answer to your question in this or other
documentation, the BIOSCI technical support staff answers e-mail
queries sent to

		       biosci-help@net.bio.net

We can only answer questions about the use of the newsgroups and
mailing lists.  We unfortunately do not have the staff to do Internet
information searches or answer scientific questions.  Please post
those to the appropriate BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.


	Contents:
	--------
	0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!

	1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.

	2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.

	3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.

	4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.


0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!
------------------------------
BIOSCI's government funding has been expended, and we are now
operating solely from advertising revenue that we have raised from our
Web site at http://www.bio.net/.  We need just a few minutes of your
time to help us serve you.

You can do two important things which will take very little time for
you individually and will immensely help us continue to help you.

First, please use our WWW system at http://www.bio.net/ to access the
archives.  You can post or reply to messages via your Web browser as
described in item #1 below.  Your usage helps attract sponsors. If you
contact any of our sponsors, please be sure to thank them for
supporting BIOSCI. It is critical for them to get this feedback if
they are to continue their sponsorship for the long term.

Second, if you work for a company or organization that provides
products or services of interest to the biology community, please pass
this message on to your marketing or marketing communications
department or other appropriate group.  Please ask them to help
support BIOSCI by sponsoring our Web site and explain the uses and
benefits of the system to the biology community. If they are
interested, they can then contact us for further information at our
tech support address, biosci-help@net.bio.net.


1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.
--------------------------------------------------------
As of 10 December 1995, all BIOSCI/bionet full newsgroups are
accessible through the World Wide Web (WWW) at URL http://www.bio.net.
One can read and reply publicly or privately to both recent postings
and archived messages through one's Web browser if it is configured
properly to send e-mail.  Each newsgroup is equipped with its own WAIS
index.  The main BIOSCI home page also has access to the BIO-JOURNALS
Table of Contents database WAIS index and the BIOSCI user address
database described in another item further below.


2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.
-------------------------------------------------------
BIOSCI is a set of parallel USENET newsgroups (the "bionet" groups),
mailing lists, and a hypermail archive at URL http://www.bio.net/.
The same postings are distributed on all media (except for a small
number of mailing-list-only groups at net.bio.net).  Unfortunately it
is becoming a despicable practice on the Internet (by a few people out
to make a fast buck) to do automated mass postings to thousands of
newsgroups and mailing lists.  These attempts to grab free advertising
are refered to as "spams" in the usual, somewhat boneheaded, net
terminology.  USENET is more susceptible to this practice, and many
spams originate on the USENET groups and then are passed on to the
mailing lists.  However, spammers also get lists of mailing addresses
and hit these too, so neither medium is immune.

What should you do personally if you get junk mail?
---------------------------------------------------
Just delete it and move on without reading it further.  Filing a
protest is becoming increasingly useless because spammers are often
disguising the addresses where the messages are sent from.  Unless you
really understand Internet mail systems, your attempt at protest by
sending replies to the message will often end up being sent to the
address of an innocent person that the spammer is victimizing.

What can BIOSCI/bionet do to protect its newsgroups?
----------------------------------------------------
The only solution currently available is to moderate the newsgroup.
If this newsgroup is already moderated, then you are in good shape.
Moderation protects the USENET distribution from about 95% of the
spams that are being sent to date and protects the mailing lists
completely.  Moderation means, however, that someone has to take the
time to review each message before it goes out.  We have set up
software here that simply allows the moderator to forward to an
address at net.bio.net messages that (s)he wishes to have distributed.
This takes no more time than that needed to read the message and pass
it on, say about 1 min. per message.

Most newsgroups currently have a discussion leader who is responsible
for their newsgroup.  The discussions leaders and their e-mail
addresses are listed in the BIOSCI Information Sheet which is
available on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  If a newsgroup is being
hit with too many junk postings, please contact the discussion leader
for that group and see if there is interest in moderating the group.
Please do not assume that by simply posting a complaint to the
newsgroup itself, anyone on the BIOSCI staff will act on your
complaint.  With close to 100 newsgroups to run, the BIOSCI staff has
to rely on the discussion leaders of each newsgroup to report problems
directly to us at biosci-help@net.bio.net.

We will moderate any of our newsgroups if the discussion leader tells
us that the readership of the group wishes to do so and if a moderator
is willing to do the work.  For most BIOSCI/bionet groups, this
entails only a few minutes of work each day.

Moderating a newsgroup will resolve probably 95% of the junk postings
on the USENET distribution.  Unfortunately there are easy ways for
determined spammers to override the moderation mechanism on USENET,
but we can protect our e-mail subscribers from unwanted postings if
the newsgroup is moderated.  You can also access our newsgroups over
the WWW at URL http://www.bio.net.  While this Web interface will not
stop spammers from trying to post to the groups, this will give you
yet another way, besides using USENET news, to keep the junk out of
your personal mail files.  For those of you with local USENET news
systems, the Web interface will also give you faster access to new
newsgroups and recent postings.


3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.
------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE NOTE: The BIOSCI management does NOT act on
subscription/unsubscription requests that are posted improperly to the
newsgroups and mailing lists.  People who do this only bother everyone
on the lists to no avail.  Please be sure to follow the proper
procedures below.

Gory details are in the BIOSCI Information sheets on the Web at
http://www.bio.net.  Below we give an example utilizing the
METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list at both of our two BIOSCI sites:

Users in the Americas and Pacific Rim countries who use the BIOSCI
------------------------------------------------------------------
node at computer net.bio.net:
----------------------------

A) Determine the "listname" which is the <=8 character mail address
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   for the group.  These can be found in the BIOSCI Info. Sheet.  For
   the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS group the mailing address is
   methods@net.bio.net.  The listname is the portion of the address to
   the left of the @ sign, i.e., "methods".  The listname is used with
   the "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" commands illustrated below.

B) Mail all commands in the body of a mail message addressed to
   biosci-server@net.bio.net.  Do NOT send commands to the newsgroup
   posting addresses!  Leave the Subject: line blank, any text on it
   will be ignored.

C) In the body of your message put one or more of the following
   commands with an "end" command on the last line, e.g.,

   subscribe methods
   unsubscribe methods
   end

   Do NOT put your e-mail address or other text on these lines.  The
   server only allows you to cancel your subscription if the address
   on your mail header matches the address on our mailing list.
   Please ask for help at biosci-help@net.bio.net if your address has
   changed, e.g., if you know you are on the list but the server tells
   you that you are not a member.


Users in Europe, Africa, and Central Asia who use the BIOSCI node at
--------------------------------------------------------------------
computer daresbury.ac.uk (also known as dl.ac.uk):
-------------------------------------------------

To subscribe and unsubscribe to/from the BIOSCI lists, you need to
specify the full USENET newsgroup name with "bionet-news." prepended.
The USENET newsgroup names are listed in the BIOSCI Information sheet
on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  For the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list
the USENET newsgroup name is bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts, thus the
appropriate commands are

    sub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

    unsub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

These commands are included in a message addressed to mxt@dl.ac.uk,
NOT to the newsgroup mailing addresses.  As usual, include the text in
the body of the message as text on the Subject: line is ignored.

To unsubscribe from all the lists at the UK node, use

    unsub bionet-news

Please note that if the address in the list is different than the one
in your mail message header, you will not be able to unsubscribe by
this method. If you have problems, please mail biosci@daresbury.ac.uk.


4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Please take this opportunity to add your name, address, and research
interest information to the BIOSCI User Address Database if you have
not already done so.

You can fill out the address form directly through our Web page at URL
http://www.bio.net/adrform.html.

The address database is reindexed nightly for WWW access (the URL is
http://www.bio.net/).  If you are not directly on the Internet but can
reach it by e-mail, please use our waismail server to access the user
directory.  waismail use is described above.  You can also request a
user address form by e-mail from biosci-help@net.bio.net.

Please check your database entry from time-to-time to see if your
address information is still up-to-date.  Because of our limited
personnel resources, we ask that you resubmit a *complete* form to
revise your entry; we only replace complete entries and do not have
resources to edit old forms.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Mar 12 22:00:00 1998
From: Yu-Ran Luo <luo@seas.marine.usf.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: A Novel Software of Organic Mass Spectra
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 21:21:12 -0500
Organization: University of South Florida
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <3509E998.239C6F83@seas.marine.usf.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.116.54.87
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!howland.erols.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-peer-west.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!news.vphos.net!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news1.usf.edu!not-for-mail

Dear Sir/Madam,

 I am writing to share good news with you. Novel software by name of
SIOMS (Smart Interpretation of Organic Mass Spectra) will be available
next month. The attached paper is its announcement.

 A gift (free Demo) was released. Please give me a reply by e-mail if
you like to try the Demo.

 Many thanks for your attention.

 Sincerely yours,

 Yu-Ran Luo, Ph.D.
============
 What is Smart Interpretation of Organic Mass Spectra?

    Smart Interpretation of Organic Mass Spectra (SIOMS) is a system for
interpretation of organic mass spectra (MS), implemented under Microsoft
Windows.

    The SIOMS is designed to simulate the intelligent behavior of
experienced mass spectroscopists who interpret organic mass spectra
frequently and deduce the molecular structures of unknowns.

   The SIOMS system mainly consists of a set of linked programs:
(1) An input system for the m/z peaks of unknowns;
(2) A forward/reverse search program with combined regulation into the
MS database;
(3) A self-learning program. The SIOMS can select a series of pertinent
MS in the database, and can self-learn by referring them to the unknown
spectrum;
(4) Interpretation programs for deducing likely molecular weight and
substructures;
(5) A structure generator for creating a sequence of candidate
structures of unknowns;
(6) Programs for theoretical MS prediction and structure evaluation of
each candidate;
(7) An output system of optimized structure(s) of unknowns.

Advantages of the SIOMS
1. The excellent self-learning ability of the program. In the SIOMS
system, the self-learning program can find necessary
substructure/spectral correlation rules in order to interpret MS and
deduce molecular structure of unknowns.
2. The ability to easily identify unknowns. This makes the SIOMS
superior to volumed library search systems in current commercial
software.
3. The input for the SIOMS system is the EI (electron ionization) MS at
low resolution of the unknowns. No more effort by the chemists is
needed, such as high resolution MS, MS/MS etc. It fits the general
purpose of organic MS laboratories, and simplifies the MS analytical
work.

Any operator of organic MS can work well as an expert while running the
SIOMS. Molecular structure of samples, including unknowns, will be
displayed once an operator inputs (automatically or manually) data of
the m/z and intensity.



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Mar 12 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.wli.net!feed2.news.erols.com!erols!news.maxwell.syr.edu!bignews.mediaways.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!zeus.rbi.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de!grapool30.rz.uni-frankfurt.de!parcej
From: parcej@biophys.mpg.de (Dr Dave Parcej)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: C-terminal protein sequencing
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 14:13:47 +0100
Organization: MPI fuer Biophysik
Lines: 23
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <parcej-1303981413470001@mac-kb5.biophys.mpg.de>
References: <c=GB%a=_%p=Axis_Genetics_pl%l=POST-OFFICE-980311102512Z-265@axisgen.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mac-kb5.biophys.mpg.de
X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.3.5

Hi
While browsing the web I came accross one company from sweden who do
C-terminal sequencing.
Their URL is http://www.innovagen.se/mbserv/protein.html
I have no affiliation and havent tried them myself, so tell me how you get on!

Dave






In article <k>, KH@axisgenetics.co.uk (Koen Hellendoorn) wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Can anyone tell me if there is any institute or company (preferably in
> the UK/ other Europe) that can do C-terminal sequencing of proteins? 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Koen

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Mar 12 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!TC3NET.COM!cola
From: cola@TC3NET.COM (cola)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: protein sequencing
Date: 13 Mar 1998 07:51:03 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 5
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <350955EC.7A12A497@tc3net.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hello,
I am trying to locate a company in the US that specialize in protein
sequencing.  The protein of interest is approxiamtley 190 amino acids,
MW 24KD.  Would appreciate assistance. Thank you Cola


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sat Mar 14 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!207.217.77.43!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!nntp.earthlink.net!usenet
From: The Antibody Resource Page <antibody@antibodyresource.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Looking for an antibody or information on antibodies?
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 09:31:35 +0000
Organization: EarthLink Network, Inc.
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <350B9FF7.C8@antibodyresource.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.255.9.98
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (Macintosh; I; 68K)

The Antibody Resource Page (http://www.antibodyresource.com/) is an
invaluable website to researchers and educators.  

Here is just some of what can be found on the page:

1. How to Find an Antibody - a variety of ways on and off the web to
find the antibody you are looking for.  There are links to free search
engines that allow you to search a multitude of companies for the
specific antibody you need.

2. Online Companies - links to over 110 companies that sell antibodies
or antibody related products.  Is your company listed on this page?

3. Antibody Image Gallery - animated antibody pictures are available

4. Bulletin Board - Have a question?  Then stop by and post a message.

5. Educational Resources - a variety of new links have been added.There
are links to pages on immunochemistry, antibody production,
autoimmunity, vaccines, immunology and much more.  This page is divided
up into sections on research, educational, and health resources.

6. The latest in antibody news - Get up-to-date,
antibody-relatedarticles on topics from academia and industry.

7.  Online databanks and databases - links to online protein and nucleic
acid sequencing databases.  Invaluable to biochemists and molecular
biologists who work with antibodies.

Check it all out at: 

http://www.antibodyresource.com/

ps.  Don't forget to visit our current sponsor, Research Diagnostics,
Inc.(http://www.researchd.com/absort1.htm).  RDI sells a wide variety of
antibodies for nearly every need.

pps. Are you interested in being a sponsor on the Antibody Resource Page
(ARP)?  Nearly half of the visitors come to find commercially available
antibodies.  If you are a company that sells antibodies and want to
increase webtraffic to your site, email the antibody resource page to
find out about sponsorship:  antibody@antibodyresource.com  

ppps.  The ARP was voted among the top 25 biotechnology webpages for
1997 by Genetic Engineering News!

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 15 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!198.6.0.5!uunet!in3.uu.net!newsfeed.attap.net!mango.singnet.com.sg!dahlia.singnet.com.sg!ocean.singnet.com.sg!id4.nus.edu.sg!nuscc.nus.edu.sg!medp4076
From: medp4076@leonis.nus.sg (Zhu Congju)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: pcDNA3.1(A)-myc
Date: 16 Mar 1998 12:08:11 GMT
Organization: National University of Singapore
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <6ej4nb$qnq$1@nuscc.nus.edu.sg>
NNTP-Posting-Host: leonis.nus.edu.sg
NNTP-Posting-User: medp4076
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Hi,

Does anybody know how I can find a positive control for pcDNA3.1(A)-myc 
(invitrogen) doing western?

Thanks!

CJ Zhu

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 15 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.ums.edu!gamera.cbl.umces.edu!cbl.umces.edu!reno
From: "Reno T. Nguyen" <reno@cbl.umces.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: carbon content of proteins?
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 09:08:20 -0500
Organization: University of Maryland, Chesapeake Biological Lab.
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.980316085204.20366C-100000@cbl.umces.edu>
References: <3506BD15.5F0F@pilot.msu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cbl.umces.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
To: Jonathan Walton <walton@pilot.msu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3506BD15.5F0F@pilot.msu.edu>

On Wed, 11 Mar 1998, Jonathan Walton wrote:

> Can anyone tell me a generally accepted average value for the % (by
> weight) of carbon in proteins?  The value of 15-16% for N is generally
> used, but how about carbon?  And (related question that would give the
> answer) is there is a program that will calculate the elemental
> composition of a protein?
> Thanks,

I've only determined the %C for Rubisco (47%) using a C and N analyzer.
The %N was 13%. I'm not aware of any program that would calculate the
elemental composition of a protein after entry of it's amino acid
composition. I have also determined the average %C and %N for the protein
amino acids usually analyzed (asp, glu, ser, his, gly, thr, arg, ala, tyr,
met, val, phe, ile, leu, lys) to be 46% and 14%, respectively.  These
average values for the amino acids should be similar to those for many
proteins.

Reno 

*************************************************************************
Reno T. Nguyen
Chesapeake Biological Laboratory                 /----\  /-----\   /
Univ. MD Center for Environmental Science      /        /      /  /  
P.O. Box 38                                  /         /______/  /
Solomons, MD 20688                         /          /       \ /
                                          /          /        // 
Tel: (410) 326-7261                      \_______/   \_______/ \_______/ 
     (410) 326-7409                    
Fax: (410) 326-7341
E-mail: reno@cbl.umces.edu
************************************************************************



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Mar 15 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!SOCRATES.BERKELEY.EDU!bbaker
From: bbaker@SOCRATES.BERKELEY.EDU (Barbara Baker)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Postdoctoral Position
Date: 16 Mar 1998 17:09:43 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 61
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <v02140b05b1330860c44d@[147.49.9.12]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

A POSTDOCTORAL POSITION is currently available for research on elucidation
of the N-mediated signal transduction pathways leading to TMV resistance.
        We isolated the first virus resistance gene, N, of plants {Whitham
et al. (1994) Cell 78, 1101-1115}.  The N gene confers resistance to
tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) in tobacco.  To elucidate the mechanisms of
N-mediated resistance we are investigating: (1) regulation of N gene
expression, (2) the structure-function relationship of the N encoded
protein domains, (3) the structure, biochemical properties and cellular
localization of the N protein (4) the identification of TMV protein
required for N induced resistance (5) identification of components of the
resistance signal transduction pathway by genetic dissection of N
resistance pathway and identification of cellular interacting proteins, and
(7) identification of genes with structural and functional similarities to
N for comparative studies.  The applicant will have the opportunity to
participate in one or more of these projects, however, the available
position primarily concerns genetic dissection of the N-mediated signal
transduction pathway in tobacco, tomato and Arabidopsis.
        N is a member of the TIR-NBS-LRR class of R genes. The sequence of
several recently isolated R genes shows that they encode deduced products
with strikingly similar structural features {Baker et al. (1997) Science
276,726-733}.  It is postulated that R genes encode receptors or components
of signaling pathways that participate in pathogen recognition and
signaling leading to cell death (hypersensitive response-HR), systemic
defense (systemic acquired resistance-SAR) and pathogen inhibition.
        The amino-terminal domain of N (TIR) and other members of this
class of R genes share homology with the cytoplasmic domains of the
interleukin-1 receptor (Il-1R) the Drosophila and human Toll receptor
proteins, participants in pathogen defense programs.  The sequence
similarity of N, IL-1R and Toll suggests that N mediates pathogen
resistance through an IL-1R/Toll-like signal transduction pathway.  The
nucleotide binding site domain (NBS) of N and other R genes is homologous
to the putative ATPase domain of the caspase activating proteins CED-4 and
Apaf-1, proteins that regulate apoptosis in C. elegans and mammals
respectively. The sequence similarity of N and other R genes to CED-4 and
Apaf-1 suggests there may be similarities between mechanisms of cell death
in plants and animals {Chinnaiyan et al. (1997) Nature 388, 728-729}.
Applicants should have experience in genetics, biochemistry, molecular
biology and/or cell biology, however, prior work with plants is not
required.  A cover letter describing research experience and interests, a
curriculum vitae and names of three references should be sent to: Dr.
Barbara Baker, University of California, Berkeley and USDA, Plant Gene
Expression Center, 800 Buchanan St., Albany, CA 94710. FAX: 510-559-5929 or
510-559-5678; email: bbaker@socrates.berkeley.edu



Barbara Baker
Plant Gene Expression Center
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology
University of California, Berkeley
& USDA-ARS
800 Buchanan St.
Albany, CA 94710
bbaker@socrates.berkeley.edu
Fax: 510-559-5678



                                



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 16 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.kodak.com!news-pen-14.sprintlink.net!207.41.200.15!news-pen-15.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.nysernet.net!news.nysernet.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!128.122.253.90!newsfeed.nyu.edu!ptdnetP!newsgate.ptd.net!fastnet!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!193.174.75.126!news-was.dfn.de!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-ber1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.rz.uni-kiel.de!not-for-mail
From: Ulf Sommer <usommer@biochem.uni-kiel.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Q: Tetranitromethane
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 18:50:43 +0100
Organization: Universtity of Kiel, Germany
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <350EB7F3.2522@biochem.uni-kiel.de>
Reply-To: usommer@biochem.uni-kiel.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: r203.biochem.uni-kiel.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)

I wonder if anyone can help me to find a supplier of tetranitromethane
after Sigma-Aldrich stopped its production. Or do you even know another
tyrosine-specific amino acid modifying reagent? I already tried
N-acetylimidazole. Many thanks.

		Ulf Sommer

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 16 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.kodak.com!news-pen-14.sprintlink.net!206.229.87.26!news-east.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!newsfeed.internetmci.com!169.207.30.81!newsfeeds.sol.net!news.mindspring.net!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!cronkite.cc.uga.edu!mac200.ccrc.uga.edu!user
From: rmerkle@uga.cc.uga.edu (Roberta K. Merkle)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Carbohydrate Laboratory Courses
Date: 17 Mar 1998 15:08:42 GMT
Organization: CCRC, Univ. Georgia
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <rmerkle-1703981013100001@mac200.ccrc.uga.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mac200.ccrc.uga.edu

Techniques for Characterization of Complex Carbohydrates

Four courses will be offered in 1998 at the Complex Carbohydrate Research
Center (CCRC) of the University of Georgia: 
1. Separation and Characterization of Glycoprotein Oligosaccharides (June 1-5), 
2. Structural Analysis of Oligosaccharides (June 8-12), 
3. Mass Spectrometry and MS/MS Analysis of Glycoconjugates  (June 15-19),  
4  NMR of Carbohydrates (July 22-26).  

Courses will consist of hands-on laboratory work, demonstrations and
lectures; lab manual including selected analytical techniques and
references will be provided.  More details can be seen at the CCRC web
site at http://www.ccrc.uga.edu/web/training/courses.html     For further
information and application form contact Dr. Roberta K. Merkle, CCRC, 220
Riverbend Road, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-4712. 
Phone: 706-542-4402.  FAX: 706-542-4412.  E-mail: rmerkle@uga.cc.uga.edu

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Mar 16 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: Cormac Shaw <cshaw@ollamh.ucd.ie>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: FPLC (Repost)
Date: 17 Mar 1998 12:35:16 -0000
Organization: University College Dublin
Lines: 108
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <6elqm4$hl1@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: cormac.shaw@ucd.ie
Original-To: walkerc@CLEMSON.EDU, PROTEINS@DL.AC.UK

[Apologies if you already got this but the gremlins were in the 
college mail system last weekend and it never appeared on my bionet 
list -C.]

On 12 Mar 98 at 6:30, Caroline J. Walker <walkerc@CLEMSON.EDU> wrote:
>We are buying an FPLC and are comparing the Biorad Biologic system with the
>Pharmacia FPLC system.  There are some small differences on the specs and
>the prices are about the same so we could use either. What I would like to
>hear is if anyone has feedback on how easy either of these systems is to
>use.  Is the Pharmacia software (OS/2) OK, or is the Windows 95 with the
>Biorad better?  How are the leaks? Design faults?? Reliability? Service?
>	Would be happy to hear any comments.
>Thanks,
>Caroline

For your consideration:
Our lab took delivery of a Biorad Biologic system about 18 months ago 
to compliment a 10 year-ish old Pharmacia FPLC system. Now the older 
system was a manual one with a basic gradient controller and a 
hardcopy-only UV output so the comparison is a little uneven.

Both systems have their good and bad points. The more recently 
designed Biologic has more user friendly tubing connections, column 
grips, etc. which makes setup and rearrangments easier, especially 
putting connectors on tubing. Its also very easy to use non-Biorad 
columns with the supplied connection adaptors. Changing buffers is 
also much quicker than the Pharmacia system.

But not all is perfect. As another poster mentioned, air bubbles are 
a pain. Unlike the Pharmacia system, the buffer uptakes are light and 
springy and must be carefully positioned to avoid popping out of the 
liquid. The long and spongy nature of the intake covers mean that 
they draw air down to the inlet even when there's several cm of 
buffer covering them (this obvious design blip ma