From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Jun 01 01:43:00 1999
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!logbridge.uoregon.edu!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!newsfeed.nacamar.de!newsfeed.nacamar.de!fu-berlin.de!server1.netnews.ja.net!pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!not-for-mail
From: Maria Jesus Martin <martin@ebi.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Release 10 of TrEMBL, a protein sequence database supplementing SWISS-PROT
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 10:36:54 +0100
Organization: EMBL-EBI
Message-ID: <3753A9B6.6461C3CF@ebi.ac.uk>
Reply-To: martin@ebi.ac.uk
NNTP-Posting-Host: burns.ebi.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk 928229815 27667 193.62.196.82 (1 Jun 1999 09:36:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Jun 1999 09:36:55 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
Lines: 96


INTRODUCTION
============

TrEMBL is a protein sequence database supplementing the SWISS-PROT
Protein Sequence Data Bank. TrEMBL contains the translations of all
coding sequences (CDS) present in the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence
Database not yet integrated in SWISS-PROT. TrEMBL can be considered
as a preliminary section of SWISS-PROT. For all TrEMBL entries
which should finally be upgraded to the standard SWISS-PROT
quality, SWISS-PROT accession numbers have been assigned.


RELEASE 10.0 OF TrEMBL
=====================

This TrEMBL release is created from the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence
Database release 58 and contains 244'862 sequence entries,
comprising 66'562'800 amino acids.

TrEMBL is split in two main sections; SP-TrEMBL and REM-TrEMBL:

SP-TrEMBL (SWISS-PROT TrEMBL) contains the entries (201'082),
which should be eventually incorporated into SWISS-PROT.
SWISS-PROT accession numbers have been assigned for all SP-TrEMBL
entries.

SP-TrEMBL is organized in subsections:

arc.dat (Archea):               7408 entries
fun.dat (Fungi):                6679 entries
hum.dat (Human):                8518 entries
inv.dat (Invertebrates):       23653 entries
mam.dat (Other Mammals):        3130 entries
mhc.dat (MHC proteins):         4236 entries
org.dat (Organelles):          16261 entries
phg.dat (Bacteriophages):       1971 entries
pln.dat (Plants):              17352 entries
pro.dat (Prokaryotes):         45992 entries
rod.dat (Rodents):              7480 entries
unc.dat (Unclassified):           44 entries
vrl.dat (Viruses):             53916 entries
vrt.dat (Other Vertebrates):    4442 entries


REM-TrEMBL (REMaining TrEMBL) contains the entries (46'785) that we do
not want to include in SWISS-PROT.


WEEKLY UPDATES OF TrEMBL AND NON-REDUNDANT DATA SETS
====================================================
Weekly cumulative updates of TrEMBL are available by anonymous FTP and
from the EBI SRS server.
We also produce every week a complete non-redundant protein sequence
collection by providing three compressed files (these are in the
directory /pub/databases/sp_tr_nrdb on the EBI FTP server):
sprot.dat.Z, trembl.dat.Z and trembl_new.dat.Z.


ACCESS/DATA DISTRIBUTION
========================

FTP server:     ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/trembl
SRS server:     http://srs.ebi.ac.uk/

TREMBL is also available on the SWISS-PROT CD-ROM.
SWISS-PROT + TREMBL is searchable on the FASTA3, BLAST2 and Bic_sw
servers of the EBI.



TrEMBL HAS BEEN PREPARED BY:
============================

Rolf Apweiler, Kirsty Bates, Margaret Biswas, Sergio Contrino,
Wolfgang Fleischmann, Gill Fraser, Henning Hermjakob, Vivien Junker,
Youla Karavidopoulou, Fiona Lang,  Minna Lehvaslaiho, Michele Magrane,
Maria Jesus Martin, Steffen Moeller, Nicoletta Mitaritonna,
Nicola Mulder, Claire O'Donovan and Eleanor Whitfield
at the EMBL Outstation - European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) in
Hinxton, UK;
Amos Bairoch and Alain Gateau at the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
in Geneva, Switzerland.


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Maria Jesus Martin                     email:martin@ebi.ac.uk
EMBL Outstation EBI
(European Bioinformatics Institute)    URL: http://www.ebi.ac.uk
Wellcome Trust Genome Campus           Tel: +44 (1223) 494408
Hinxton                                fax: +44 (1223) 494468
Cambridge
CB10 1SD UK
-----------------------------------------------------------------



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Jun 01 07:13:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!newsfeed.nacamar.de!newsfeed.nacamar.de!news-fra.pop.de!newsfeed.ecrc.net!news.belnet.be!news.rediris.es!news.uv.es!not-for-mail
From: paz <pmoreno@ibv.csic.es>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: metalloproteinases
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 17:03:50 +0200
Organization: Universitat de Valencia
Message-ID: <3753F655.FACF9227@ibv.csic.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.146.183.148
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: peque.uv.es 928249439 22592 193.146.183.148 (1 Jun 1999 15:03:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: postmaster@uv.es
NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Jun 1999 15:03:59 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
Lines: 4

I am a student, and i am studing a particalars proteins, the
metalloproteinases. I don´t know about of that. If somebody know about
of that i would be very grateful.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Jun 02 08:04:00 1999
Path: biosci!NS.GLC.CN.NET!longjy
From: longjy@NS.GLC.CN.NET (Jianyin Long)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: vefg
Date: 2 Jun 1999 09:04:17 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 7
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <37555471.35340659@ns.glc.cn.net>
Reply-To: longjy@cheerful.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

I'm wondering that if fusion of some  short peptides to the c-terminal
of VEGF has any effects on the expression of VEGF and its bioactivity ?



v


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Jun 02 08:57:00 1999
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!skynet.be!poster!not-for-mail
From: "Fiers-Vercruysse" <fiers.vercruysse@skynet.be>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: plant biotechnology club
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 18:50:58 +0200
Organization: Belgacom Skynet SA/NV
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <7j3nf9$rvk$1@news1.skynet.be>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup23.mechelen.skynet.be
X-Trace: news1.skynet.be 928342313 28660 195.238.30.23 (2 Jun 1999 16:51:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@skynet.be
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Jun 1999 16:51:53 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211

Dear all, this is a message in which i will present a new online club for
people interested in plant molecular biology. It does not contain any
question or answer to a problem mentioned higher. Please ignore if not
interested.
The plant biotechnology club is a club recently founded to bring together
researchers in the field of
plant molecular biology from all over the world to discuss the research in
there area. With the
controverse existing these days about GMOs in the media our discussions have
been concentrating on that
topic: the ethic aspects of genetic engineering of plants, public opinion,
environmental aspects, etc.
But it is also the goal of the club to discuss research problems and
advances.
Currently there are two founders in this club: Shai Lawit, graduate student
in plant molecular
biology at the University of Florida and Dan Hancock, medical student at
Cambridge. They 'lead' the
discussions and bring up new topics to discuss in order to keep the quality
of the discussions as high as possible.
The club mostly works via its message board where every member can post a
message that all other members can read and reply to at later times (just as
in newsgroups). In addition to this there is also a place where links can be
added to interesting sites on the internet concerning the subject. (A very
interesting link that has been added there is to the yahoo full coverage
site on the news about GMOs where you can follow up the most recent news on
the subject.) Also a place in this club that may be of much interest in the
future is the chat room to discuss topics in a more direct way.
This club has been started up 3 weeks ago and I guess it will need some time
to grow bigger to become as
interesting as it is intended to be. That is why we keep on looking for
interesting and interested members
to participate in our club. The more people, the more ideas! Nevertheless,
we have had already some
interesting discussions.
You can find the club at http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/plantbiotechnology. If
you want to obtain more information about how to funtion in the club, mail
your questions to gentech2002@yahoo.com.




From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Jun 02 14:45:00 1999
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!chippy.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!128.174.5.49!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!not-for-mail
From: colby <none@uiuc.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: H-bonding side-chains
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 17:44:00 -0500
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <3755B3B0.8B801D00@uiuc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bambam.scs.uiuc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en

Can the side chain of a tryptophan residue accept a H-bond? What about
an arginine residue?

According to http://swift.embl-heidelberg.de/future/aainfo/hbonds.html,
the only site on the web I found that discusses amino acid side chain
H-bonding, these two residues do not seem to accept H-bonds. Is it
because of steric hindrance by the atoms that the N-atoms are bonded to?
If so, why does it not affect the H-bond accepting capability of
histidine?

I appreciate any replies.



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Jun 02 17:55:00 1999
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!awabi.library.ucla.edu!128.230.129.106!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!carnaval.risq.qc.ca.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Benoit Pelletier" <bp@hermes.usherb.ca>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: alcohol dehydrogenase MW
Lines: 4
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Message-ID: <gbl53.3478$U4.90415@carnaval.risq.qc.ca>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 01:50:04 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.167.181.108
X-Trace: carnaval.risq.qc.ca 928374604 206.167.181.108 (Wed, 02 Jun 1999 21:50:04 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 21:50:04 EDT

Can some one give me molecular weight of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme ???




From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Jun 02 21:52:00 1999
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!logbridge.uoregon.edu!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!portc01.blue.aol.com!audrey01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: baron0805@aol.com (Baron0805)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: H-bonding side-chains
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder05.news.aol.com
X-Admin: news@aol.com
Date: 3 Jun 1999 05:46:50 GMT
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
References: <3755B3B0.8B801D00@uiuc.edu>
Message-ID: <19990603014650.10959.00000349@ng-fd1.aol.com>
Lines: 8

I looked in my Cell book to see what you were talking about.  Both of these
structures are very stable structures.  Tryptphan is stabilized by the ring
structures and Arginine is stabilized by its resonance ability.  I would say
that these two amino acids are able to H-bond, but it is very unlikely due to
resonance.  That would be my guess.
Junior, Biology, University of Southern Indiana

Question everything!!!!

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Jun 02 23:35:00 1999
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!207.172.3.37!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!netnews.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!news-was.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.gwdg.de!not-for-mail
From: Steffen Schmidt <sschmid2@Uni-MolGen.gwdg.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: pk of Threonin
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 07:49:30 +0200
Organization: GWDG, Goettingen
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <3756176A.5E45B8EA@Uni-MolGen.gwdg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.76.70.65
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="------------E26008AF265D99F74D268E6F"
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------E26008AF265D99F74D268E6F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

does anyone know the pk-value of the hydroxy-group of threonin, or a
citation where I can find it.

Thanks, Steffen

--------------E26008AF265D99F74D268E6F
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="sschmid2.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Steffen Schmidt
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="sschmid2.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Schmidt;Steffen
tel;work:Arbeitsgruppe PD Dr. R. Sterner
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.gwdg.de/~sschmid3
org:Institut für Mikrobiologie und Genetik;Abteilung für molekulare Genetik und präparative Molekularbiologie
adr:;;Grisebachstr. 8;37077 Göttingen;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:sschmid2@Uni-MolGen.gwdg.de
title:Georg-August Universität Göttingen
fn:Steffen Schmidt
end:vcard

--------------E26008AF265D99F74D268E6F--


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 03 08:15:00 1999
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!washdc3-snf1!news.gtei.net!news.ums.edu!gamera.cbl.umces.edu!news.umces.edu!cbl.umces.edu!reno
From: "Reno T. Nguyen" <reno@cbl.umces.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: H-bonding side-chains
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 12:00:28 -0400
Organization: University of Maryland Chesapeake Biological Laboratory
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9906031157180.14933-100000@cbl.umces.edu>
References: <3755B3B0.8B801D00@uiuc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cbl.umces.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: gamera.cbl.umces.edu 928425636 25104 131.118.224.6 (3 Jun 1999 16:00:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: feedback@cbl.umces.edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Jun 1999 16:00:36 GMT
To: colby <none@uiuc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3755B3B0.8B801D00@uiuc.edu>


Hi,

Check out the URL address http://www.proteometrics.com/aainfo/contents.htm
There's info. on residue hydrogen bonding for Arginine and tryptophan.  

Reno Nguyen
                           


On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, colby wrote:

> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 17:44:00 -0500
> From: colby <none@uiuc.edu>
> Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
> Subject: H-bonding side-chains
> 
> Can the side chain of a tryptophan residue accept a H-bond? What about
> an arginine residue?
> 
> According to http://swift.embl-heidelberg.de/future/aainfo/hbonds.html,
> the only site on the web I found that discusses amino acid side chain
> H-bonding, these two residues do not seem to accept H-bonds. Is it
> because of steric hindrance by the atoms that the N-atoms are bonded to?
> If so, why does it not affect the H-bond accepting capability of
> histidine?
> 
> I appreciate any replies.
> 
> 
> 
> 


*************************************************************************
Reno T. Nguyen
Chesapeake Biological Laboratory                 /----\  /-----\   /
Univ. MD Center for Environmental Science      /        /      /  /  
P.O. Box 38                                  /         /______/  /
Solomons, MD 20688                         /          /       \ /
                                          /          /        // 
Tel: (410) 326-7261                      \_______/   \_______/ \_______/ 
     (410) 326-7409                    
Fax: (410) 326-7341
E-mail: reno@cbl.umces.edu
************************************************************************



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 03 08:25:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!washdc3-snf1!news.gtei.net!news.ums.edu!gamera.cbl.umces.edu!news.umces.edu!cbl.umces.edu!reno
From: "Reno T. Nguyen" <reno@cbl.umces.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: pk of Threonin
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 12:19:52 -0400
Organization: University of Maryland Chesapeake Biological Laboratory
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9906031209120.14933-100000@cbl.umces.edu>
References: <3756176A.5E45B8EA@Uni-MolGen.gwdg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cbl.umces.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: gamera.cbl.umces.edu 928426794 25356 131.118.224.6 (3 Jun 1999 16:19:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: feedback@cbl.umces.edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Jun 1999 16:19:54 GMT
To: Steffen Schmidt <sschmid2@Uni-MolGen.gwdg.de>
In-Reply-To: <3756176A.5E45B8EA@Uni-MolGen.gwdg.de>


Hi,

Check out the URL address http://www.proteometrics.com/aainfo/contents.htm
You'll find info on the pKa values for the side chains of amino acids that
ionize.  Threonine's hydroxy side chain does not ionize. You won't find
any pKa value for Thr, other than for its alpha amino and carboxyl groups.
Only the side chains of the following amino acids will ionize: 

Arg (guanido group)
Asp (beta carboxylic acid)
Cys (sulfhydryl) 
Glu (gamma carboxylic acid)
His (imidazole)
Lys (epsilon amino group)
Tyr (phenol) 


Reno Nguyen


On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Steffen Schmidt wrote:

> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 07:49:30 +0200
> From: Steffen Schmidt <sschmid2@Uni-MolGen.gwdg.de>
> Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
> Subject: pk of Threonin
> 
> Hi,
> 
> does anyone know the pk-value of the hydroxy-group of threonin, or a
> citation where I can find it.
> 
> Thanks, Steffen
> 


*************************************************************************
Reno T. Nguyen
Chesapeake Biological Laboratory                 /----\  /-----\   /
Univ. MD Center for Environmental Science      /        /      /  /  
P.O. Box 38                                  /         /______/  /
Solomons, MD 20688                         /          /       \ /
                                          /          /        // 
Tel: (410) 326-7261                      \_______/   \_______/ \_______/ 
     (410) 326-7409                    
Fax: (410) 326-7341
E-mail: reno@cbl.umces.edu
************************************************************************



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 03 10:13:00 1999
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!arclight.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!not-for-mail
From: colby <none@uiuc.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: H-bonding side-chains
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 13:07:44 -0500
Organization: None
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <3756C470.41C6@uiuc.edu>
References: <3755B3B0.8B801D00@uiuc.edu> <19990603014650.10959.00000349@ng-fd1.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: leucine.ncsa.uiuc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP12)

Baron0805 wrote:
> 
> I looked in my Cell book to see what you were talking about.  Both of these
> structures are very stable structures.  Tryptphan is stabilized by the ring
> structures and Arginine is stabilized by its resonance ability.  I would say
> that these two amino acids are able to H-bond, but it is very unlikely due to
> resonance.  That would be my guess.

Thanks for your reply. It prompts me to ask why histidine is able to
accept a H-bond - in fact both N-atoms in the His sidechain can be
H-bond acceptors. Does histidine not have resonance stabilization too?
(You can find details at
http://swift.embl-heidelberg.de/future/aainfo/hbonds.html).

-colby

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 03 10:20:00 1999
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!arclight.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!not-for-mail
From: colby <none@uiuc.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: H-bonding side-chains
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 13:14:53 -0500
Organization: None
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <3756C61D.167E@uiuc.edu>
References: <3755B3B0.8B801D00@uiuc.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.05.9906031157180.14933-100000@cbl.umces.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: leucine.ncsa.uiuc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP12)

Reno T. Nguyen wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Check out the URL address http://www.proteometrics.com/aainfo/contents.htm
> There's info. on residue hydrogen bonding for Arginine and tryptophan.

Hi,

	Thanks for your reply. But the site you mention has the same link as
the site I mentioned earlier, it was the data at this site that made me
raise the question. I'm interested in knowing what makes the His side
chain an *acceptor* of H-bonds, but not the Arg and Trp side chains.
(All these side chains do act as H-bond *donors*).

I appreciate any replies.

-colby

> On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, colby wrote:
> 
> > Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 17:44:00 -0500
> > From: colby <none@uiuc.edu>
> > Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
> > Subject: H-bonding side-chains
> >
> > Can the side chain of a tryptophan residue accept a H-bond? What about
> > an arginine residue?
> >
> > According to http://swift.embl-heidelberg.de/future/aainfo/hbonds.html,
> > the only site on the web I found that discusses amino acid side chain
> > H-bonding, these two residues do not seem to accept H-bonds.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 03 10:52:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!uchinews2!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!netnews.com!news-peer1.sprintlink.net!news-in-west1.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.aecom.yu.edu!fengli
From: Tristan <fengli@aecom.yu.edu>
Newsgroups: sci.research.postdoc,bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.general
Subject: Re: Postdocs in biochemistry & molecular biology, U. of Chicago
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 14:41:32 -0400
Organization: Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Lines: 31
Distribution: na
Message-ID: <030619991441325243%fengli@aecom.yu.edu>
References: <FCo69u.LJq@midway.uchicago.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: skylark.aecom.yu.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=HZ-GB-2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: jm68@midway.uchicago.edu (Jim Mensch)
Posted-And-Mailed: yes
User-Agent: YA-NewsWatcher/4.2.2
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.proteins:14429 bionet.general:33208

[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
   the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]

No email responses allowed and you will discard all emails?  That's why
you have to post your message twice on the newsgroup!

Don't annoy other people anymore if you feel annoyed by other people's
email.

Tris


In article <FCo69u.LJq@midway.uchicago.edu>, Jim Mensch
<jm68@midway.uchicago.edu> wrote:

> Two postdoctoral research positions will soon be available at the Kennedy
> Mental Retardation and Connective Tissue Research Center located at the
> University of Chicago, Chicago IL.  These positions will involve research
> projects in the areas of protein biochemistry/enzymology and molecular
> biology.  To be considered for these appointments, and for further
> information, please write to:
> 
>         Postdoctoral Search
>         Kennedy Center,  MC5058
>         5841 S. Maryland Ave.
>         Chicago IL 60637
> 
> Please include curriculum vitae in your correspondence.  No phone calls or 
> email please.  The person posting this announcement is not reviewing the
> applicants; all email responses will be discarded.
>             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 03 11:03:00 1999
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: pk of Threonin
From: immune@intergate.bc.ca (immunechem)
Reply-To: immune@intergate.bc.ca
Organization: Internet Gateway
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7
References: <3756176A.5E45B8EA@Uni-MolGen.gwdg.de> <Pine.GSO.4.05.9906031209120.14933-100000@cbl.umces.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
NNTP-Posting-Host: pm45s14.intergate.bc.ca
Message-ID: <3756cefa@carrera.intergate.ca>
Date: 3 Jun 1999 11:52:42 -0800
X-Trace: 3 Jun 1999 11:52:42 -0800, pm45s14.intergate.bc.ca
Lines: 64
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.vphos.net!carrera.intergate.ca!pm45s14.intergate.bc.ca

even at pH 14?
I though any OH group is analog of water. then should be ionizable

In article <Pine.GSO.4.05.9906031209120.14933-100000@cbl.umces.edu>, 
reno@cbl.umces.edu says...
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Check out the URL address 
http://www.proteometrics.com/aainfo/contents.htm
>You'll find info on the pKa values for the side chains of amino acids 
that
>ionize.  Threonine's hydroxy side chain does not ionize. You won't find
>any pKa value for Thr, other than for its alpha amino and carboxyl 
groups.
>Only the side chains of the following amino acids will ionize: 
>
>Arg (guanido group)
>Asp (beta carboxylic acid)
>Cys (sulfhydryl) 
>Glu (gamma carboxylic acid)
>His (imidazole)
>Lys (epsilon amino group)
>Tyr (phenol) 
>
>
>Reno Nguyen
>
>
>On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Steffen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 07:49:30 +0200
>> From: Steffen Schmidt <sschmid2@Uni-MolGen.gwdg.de>
>> Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
>> Subject: pk of Threonin
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> does anyone know the pk-value of the hydroxy-group of threonin, or a
>> citation where I can find it.
>> 
>> Thanks, Steffen
>> 
>
>
>***********************************************************************
**
>Reno T. Nguyen
>Chesapeake Biological Laboratory                 /----\  /-----\   /
>Univ. MD Center for Environmental Science      /        /      /  /  
>P.O. Box 38                                  /         /______/  /
>Solomons, MD 20688                         /          /       \ /
>                                          /          /        // 
>Tel: (410) 326-7261                      \_______/   \_______/ 
\_______/ 
>     (410) 326-7409                    
>Fax: (410) 326-7341
>E-mail: reno@cbl.umces.edu
>***********************************************************************
*
>
>


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 03 11:51:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!192.195.196.233!testbox!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3756DB98.5937@bridgew.edu>
From: "Frank R. Gorga" <fgorga@bridgew.edu>
Reply-To: fgorga@bridgew.edu
Organization: Bridgewater State College
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: H-bonding side-chains
References: <3755B3B0.8B801D00@uiuc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 64
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 15:46:32 -0400
NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.241.191.50
X-Trace: testbox 928439125 134.241.191.50 (Thu, 03 Jun 1999 15:45:25 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 15:45:25 EDT

colby wrote:
> 
> Can the side chain of a tryptophan residue accept a H-bond? What about
> an arginine residue?
> 
> According to http://swift.embl-heidelberg.de/future/aainfo/hbonds.html,
> the only site on the web I found that discusses amino acid side chain
> H-bonding, these two residues do not seem to accept H-bonds. Is it
> because of steric hindrance by the atoms that the N-atoms are bonded to?
> If so, why does it not affect the H-bond accepting capability of
> histidine?
> 
> I appreciate any replies.

The simple answer is "yes"... the side chains of all of these residues
(Tyr, Arg & His) are chemically capable of both donating to and
accepting hydrogen bonds. Wether they will do so in a specific
situtation in a protein is, of course, much more complicated.

Here is the longer answer...

Hydrogen bonding requirements

 Donor --  a polar X-H bond

    i.e. X is significantly more electronegative than H;
    for proteins X is almost always N or O

 Acceptor -- -Y:

    i.e. an electronegative atom with a nonbonded (lone) pair
of            electrons, again for proteins this is almost always N or O

Bottom line --

The hydroxyl (OH) of tyrosine is capable of both donating to and
accepting H bonds The same is true for both the guanidium group of arg
and the imidazole group of histidine.

As for resonance (suggested in other replies)... it has nothing to do
with hydrogen bonding.


Biochemically --

The situtation in proteins is much more complicated... in order to form
a H-bond in proteins both donor and acceptor have to be positioned
properly with respect to one another (both angle and distance are
critical). The polarity of environment is also critical... the more
polar the enviroment the less likely a residue will be H-boned to
anything other that water.


Hope this helps,

-- FRG

*********************************
Frank R. Gorga, Ph.D.
Department of Chemical Sciences
Bridgewater State College
Bridgewater, MA 02325
(508) 697-1200 x2827
fgorga@bridgew.edu

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 03 13:47:00 1999
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!logbridge.uoregon.edu!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!newsfeed.tli.de!grolier!club-internet!not-for-mail
From: "ciavatti" <ciavatti@club-internet.fr>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: nitrosomonas
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 23:39:17 +0200
Organization: Club-Internet (France)
Message-ID: <7j6sp0$t21$1@front3.grolier.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lorient-1-1.club-internet.fr
X-Trace: front3.grolier.fr 928446048 29761 195.36.142.1 (3 Jun 1999 21:40:48 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Jun 1999 21:40:48 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Lines: 14

I search informations on oxydation of NH4+ by Nitosomonas :

all pot Redox of electron transporteurs
synthesis of ATP?
What is the hydogen and electron accepteur?
how does Nitrosomonas incorporate CO2?
and also the same informations for chiomiotrophic bacteria using H2S
with many thanks

G. Ciavatti
ciavatti@club-internet.fr
http://perso.club-internet.fr/ciavatti/evolution/evolution.htm



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 03 15:08:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!awabi.library.ucla.edu!164.67.43.25!news.ucla.edu!not-for-mail
From: "Kevin Klapstein" <kklap@biomath.medsch.ucla.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Request for help regarding homology recognition by RecA
Date: 3 Jun 1999 23:02:44 GMT
Organization: University of California, Los Angeles
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <01beae13$53a3adc0$1c9c8e95@gradlab_pc_2.biomath.medsch.ucla.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 149.142.156.28
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1155

Hello;

I'm currently studying RecA, and I'm interested in the 
homology recognition part of the strand exchange process.
Particularly puzzling to us right now is how homology is
recognized between two DNA molecules when one of them
(the one bound to RecA) is extended by 50%.  There are
also some topological problem I am trying to work out
that seem very stubborn.

If anybody reading this has an interest in or knowledge 
about the homology recognition phase of RecA facilitated
strand exchange and wouldn't mind talking to a confused 
graduate student for a little while, please drop me a line.

Cheers,

Kevin

kklap@biomath.medsch.ucla.edu





From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Jun 07 03:55:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!bofh.vszbr.cz!news.daimi.au.dk!not-for-mail
From: "Ditlev Brodersen" <ding@imsb.au.dk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: XAct: A program for construction of crystallisation trials
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 13:40:15 +0200
Organization: IMSB, Aarhus University, Denmark
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <7jgb46$4396o$1@xinwen.daimi.au.dk>
Reply-To: "Ditlev Brodersen" <ding@imsb.au.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dings.imsb.au.dk
X-Trace: xinwen.daimi.au.dk 928755654 4302040 255.255.255.255 (7 Jun 1999 11:40:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@daimi.au.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Jun 1999 11:40:54 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211

SOFTWARE ANNOUNCEMENT:

*****************************************************************

                     XAct 1.0 for Windows 95/98

            A Program for Contruction, Automated Setup,
          and Bookkeeping of Crystallisation Experiments

                   Macromolecular Crystallography
           Institute of Molecular and Structural Biology
                         Aarhus University
                              Denmark

*****************************************************************

XAct is a stand-alone application for Microsoft Windows 95/98 that
can be used to construct, maintain, and record the results of many
crystallisation experiments. Through an extensive object-oriented
data structure, the program supports multiple users each with many
crystallisation experiments organised in a hierarchical fashion.

The program has been developed in the Laboratory for Macromolecular
Crystallography, Institute of Molecular and Structural Biology, Aar-
hus University, Denmark headed by Asc. Prof. Jens Nyborg.

XAct is being used on a daily basis in our laboratory by technicians,
students, grad. students, and post.doc.'s to set up crystalisation
trials in an organised way. At the moment, the program can be down-
loaded in a late beta-version.

The software is available free of change to all academic users after
the registration form has been completed. Registration and download
is done through the XAct homepage at

  http://zombie.imsb.au.dk/xact

This page also contains additional information about the software,
screen shots, manual, references, etc.

The program supports automatic dispensing of the designed solutions
using a Gilson model 222 autosampler attached to the PC. We are espe-
cially interested in response from people who have this equipment in
the lab and who might wish to use it for setting up crystallisation
trials.

  Ditlev Brodersen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      __
     /_/\       Ditlev E. Brodersen       Phone: +45 8942 5021
    / /\ \      M.Sc., Ph.D. student      Fax  : +45 8620 1222
   / / /\ \     IMSB, Aarhus University   Email: ding@imsb.au.dk
  / / /\ \ \    Gustav Wieds Vej 10c      WWW  : http://imsb.au.dk/~ding/
 / /_/__\ \ \   DK-8000 Aarhus C
/_/______\_\/\  Denmark
\_\_________\/




From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Jun 07 17:30:00 1999
Path: biosci!esr.cri.nz!Rachael.Russell
From: Rachael.Russell@esr.cri.nz ("Russell, Rachael")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Cell lysing for protein assay
Date: 7 Jun 1999 18:30:27 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 12
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <9173148B8F8CD1118AAC00805F0649C66C2C61@KSCXCHG2>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hi there
I am looking for protocols cell lysing for Luciferase assays - I have a kit
that has everything but the lysing buffer! If anyone has any ideas, please
let me know. Am currently using an EDTA/PBS/Triton X-100 buffer, but would
like to know of more possibile buffers, and methods ie how long to incubate
buffer. (I am using adherant cells in 96-well plates)

Thanks
Rachael Russell
ESR
Kenepuru Science Centre
New Zealand

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Jun 08 14:24:00 1999
From: "Tom Johnston" <tomj@free4all.co.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: horseradish peroxidase
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 23:09:43 +0100
Lines: 8
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.131.244.249
Message-ID: <375d949a@news.jakinternet.co.uk>
X-Trace: 8 Jun 1999 23:09:30 GMT, 194.131.244.249
Path: biosci!newshost.lanl.gov!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!peernews!news.jakinternet.co.uk!194.131.244.249

Does anyone know if horseradish peroxidase has sialic acids on its
carbohydrates and if so what type(s)?

Cheers,

Tom



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Jun 09 09:27:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!wnmaster2!not-for-mail
From: "Bob" <robdebob@att.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: how to calculate the molar absorption coefficient of a protein?
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 13:21:37 -0400
Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <7jm7qv$ing$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.78.211.42
X-Trace: bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net 928948895 19184 12.78.211.42 (9 Jun 1999 17:21:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jun 1999 17:21:35 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211

Is there any web site that would calculate the absorption coefficient of a
protein on the basis of the number of tryptophans, tyrosins, Phe, disulfide
bonds...

Or if not, what is the formula?

Thanks, Rob





From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Jun 09 10:51:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!europa.netcrusader.net!206.228.179.2!news-peer1.sprintlink.net!news-in-central.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.aecom.yu.edu!not-for-mail
From: gottfrie@aecom.yu.edu (David Gottfried)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: how to calculate the molar absorption coefficient of a protein?
Date: 9 Jun 1999 18:41:01 GMT
Organization: AECOM  Bronx, NY
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <7jmcft$a4q$1@moonbeam.aecom.yu.edu>
References: <7jm7qv$ing$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>
Reply-To: gottfrie@aecom.yu.edu (David Gottfried)
NNTP-Posting-Host: photon.aecom.yu.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0

In <7jm7qv$ing$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>, "Bob" <robdebob@att.net> writes:
>Is there any web site that would calculate the absorption coefficient of a
>protein on the basis of the number of tryptophans, tyrosins, Phe, disulfide
>bonds...
>
>Or if not, what is the formula?
>

See the article: Gill and von Hippel, Analytical Biochemistry 182, 319-326 (1989).

----------------------------
David S. Gottfried, Ph.D.
Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
----------------------------


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Wed Jun 09 11:36:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.nyu.edu!newsfeed.sgi.net!pitt.edu!not-for-mail
From: pxpst2@vms.cis.pitt.edu (Peter)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Cell lysing for protein assay
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 15:29:53 -0400
Organization: University Of Pittsburgh
Lines: 23
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <pxpst2-0906991529530001@pelli.pathology.pitt.edu>
References: <9173148B8F8CD1118AAC00805F0649C66C2C61@KSCXCHG2>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pelli.pathology.pitt.edu
Mail-Copies-To: pxpst2@vms.cis.pitt.edu
X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4.4

In article <9173148B8F8CD1118AAC00805F0649C66C2C61@KSCXCHG2>,
Rachael.Russell@esr.cri.nz ("Russell, Rachael") wrote:

> If anyone has any ideas, please
> let me know. Am currently using an EDTA/PBS/Triton X-100 buffer, but would
> like to know of more possibile buffers, and methods ie how long to incubate
> buffer. (I am using adherant cells in 96-well plates)

20 mM Tris pH 8 with the addition of prtease inhibitors is what I use.
PBS is normal saline so yo will have to use mechanical force to break the
cell open.

regards,

-- 
Peter

_____________________________________________________________________
" Some of you might not agree 
'Cause you probably likes a lot of misery 
But think a while and you will see... 
Broken hearts are for assholes"
                                    FZ

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 10 01:44:00 1999
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.news.xara.net!xara.net!server5.netnews.ja.net!news.york.ac.uk!not-for-mail
From: "Peter Ashton" <pda2@york.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: how to calculate the molar absorption coefficient of a protein?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:39:46 +0100
Organization: The University of York, UK
Lines: 23
Sender: pda2@york.ac.uk
Message-ID: <7jo129$9hr$1@pump1.york.ac.uk>
References: <7jm7qv$ing$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: biolpc294.york.ac.uk
X-Trace: pump1.york.ac.uk 929007497 9787 144.32.84.128 (10 Jun 1999 09:38:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@york.ac.uk
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Jun 1999 09:38:17 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300

this should tell you what you need to know

http://www.expasy.ch/tools/protparam.html

Pete


Bob <robdebob@att.net> wrote in message
news:7jm7qv$ing$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net...
> Is there any web site that would calculate the absorption coefficient of a
> protein on the basis of the number of tryptophans, tyrosins, Phe,
disulfide
> bonds...
>
> Or if not, what is the formula?
>
> Thanks, Rob
>
>
>
>



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 10 01:54:00 1999
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!newsfeed.nacamar.de!newsfeed.nacamar.de!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!bofh.vszbr.cz!news.inet.tele.dk!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Krag <tk@dcb-glostrup.dk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: GST-fusion degradation!
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 12:02:19 +0200
Organization: Tele Danmark Internet
Message-ID: <375F8D2B.38C1A56C@dcb-glostrup.dk>
References: <01bea6f6$11907cc0$3754cc84@ribosome.bch.umontreal.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.192.80.89
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.inet.tele.dk 929008123 1902 194.192.80.89 (10 Jun 1999 09:48:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: Department of Abuse <abuse@news.inet.tele.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Jun 1999 09:48:43 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [da] (Win95; I)
Lines: 49

I don't know what kind of proteins you are working with, but some of the
degradation depends on the N-terminal part of the fused protein. Meaning
that if you've got an N-terminal, which isn't tightly coiled up or bound
to the rest of the protein with disulphide bridges, it becomes more
susceptibel for proteolytic digest. It is hard to avoid this
degradation, but to some instance a lowering of the temperature will do
it, to 30 or 27 degrees celsius.
If you lower the concentration of the inducer and instead induce twice
within an hour, you may get better results as well. Nothing guaranteed
though!
 Addition of more inhibitors like Aprotinin, pepstatin and leupeptin may
help. Regarding sonication, it is probably the best method, though I
know a lot of people will dispute this. But everything depends on your
sonication protocol. Some of your protein may stay in the pellet after
sonication, in which case you'll have to revise your protocol or you may
denature the whole thing.

I'm not sure the MBP-fusion system will solve the degradation issue as
your problem does not seem to have anything to do with the
fusionprotein, GST, itself! 

Regards

Thomas Krag

PS What cell line are you using? BL21, DH5alpha, ....?

Robert, Francis skrev:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
>         I'm working with GST-fusion system.  For two of my fusion proteins I get
> degradation of the fused part only while for others, ther is no degradation
> at all.   This means that the only protein I can purify is the GST alone
> since it has a better affinity for the column than the fusion protein.  I'm
> not sure, but I think I see on a coomassie-stained gel that the degradation
> occurs fisrt in the cells and continues during the course of the
> purification. I use PMSF and Benzamidine.  Should I use more inhibitors?
> The lysis method implies sonication, should I use other lysis methods?
> 
>         Is there any magical methods that would prevent degradation like reducing
> the growth temperature or the inducing time? Would the MBP-fusion system be
> a better system in case of degradation.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Francis R.

--

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 10 01:55:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!hermes.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!hub1.ispnews.com!cyc12.deja.bcandid.com!nntp1.deja.com!nnrp2.deja.com!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Kresten <kresten@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: how to calculate the molar absorption coefficient of a protein?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 08:54:03 GMT
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <7jnuf9$d2t$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <7jm7qv$ing$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> <7jmcft$a4q$1@moonbeam.aecom.yu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.226.1.36
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jun 10 08:54:03 1999 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 www2.crc.dk:3128 (Squid/2.1.RELEASE),NetCache@www-cache: Version 3.3.1, 1.0 x29.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 130.226.182.217, 130.226.1.36


> >Is there any web site that would calculate the absorption coefficient
of a

NO (not yet), but there are ways of estimating them

> >protein on the basis of the number of tryptophans, tyrosins, Phe,
disulfide
> >bonds...

> >
>
> See the article: Gill and von Hippel, Analytical Biochemistry 182,
319-326 (1989).

There has also been a more recent paper going down the same way. I
cannot (sorry) find the ref. at the moment.

Also see:
http://www.expasy.ch/tools/protparam.html
and the references at that site.

HTH
Kresten

--
The address kresten@my-dejanews.com is for spambots only. Please mail me
at LysLeuLeu@crc.dk , transforming the pre@-part into my initials.
Kresten Lindorff Larsen, Dept. Yeast Genetics
Carlsberg Laboratory, Denmark


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 10 02:35:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!bofh.vszbr.cz!news.inet.tele.dk!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Krag <tk@dcb-glostrup.dk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Concentrating enzymes
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 12:42:54 +0200
Organization: Tele Danmark Internet
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <375F96AE.CC8A3DBA@dcb-glostrup.dk>
References: <3.0.1.32.19990525161510.006dbd7c@cc.usu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.192.80.89
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.inet.tele.dk 929010557 1902 194.192.80.89 (10 Jun 1999 10:29:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: Department of Abuse <abuse@news.inet.tele.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Jun 1999 10:29:17 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [da] (Win95; I)

Why not just dialyse the pooled batches into 20mM Tris, 0.5M NaCl
, pH 7.4 or a buffer that is compatible with your enzyme, and after
dialysis, let the pool recirculate on your ConA column overnight or some
hours (depends on the size of your column). Elution will happen in a
much smaller volume, so you may get from 200 ml pooled batch to 1½-2 ml
eluted protein in two easy steps. Only problem is your requirement for
concentration at an earlier step. 

Regards

Thomas Krag


Phil Harrison skrev:
> 
> Hello all.
> 
> I have been losing my enzyme activity when I concentrate the
> enzyme and could use some help.
> I am purifying a fructosyltransferase from plant tissue.  After
> ammonium sulfate fractionation and
> desalting, I have been pooling 4-5 batches and concentrating by
> an Amicon thin channel device.
> These are not sold any more, so let me explain that they are
> like a stirred cell, except the
> enzyme solution is pumped through a thin channel tangentially
> over the surface of the membrane.
> Nitrogen from a compressed nitrogen tank pushes the buffer
> through the membrane while the pump
> recirculates the enzyme solution over the membrane.
> 
> I am concentrating ca. 200 ml down to ca. 45 ml.  Occasionally I
> get ca. 90% recovery of the
> enzyme activity.  More often I get 20-25% recovery, and
> sometimes even less.
> 
> Can anyone suggest a method or methods for concentrating that
> would be more gentle on my
> enzyme?  It is a glycoprotein of MW ca. 60 kD.  I use a ConA
> column later in the procedure,
> but need concentrating steps earlier.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Phil

-- 
********************************************************************
Thomas Krag, M.Sc                     Phone/work: +45 43232470
Dept. of Clinical Biochemistry        Fax/work:   +45 43233929
Glostrup Hospital                     Email/work: tk@dcb-glostrup.dk
DK-2600 Glostrup                      Email/home: krag@post6.tele.dk
Denmark                                 
********************************************************************

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 10 03:35:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!uchinews2!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!newsfeed.enteract.com!newsfeed.tli.de!newsfeed.nacamar.de!fu-berlin.de!news.uni-paderborn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.gwdg.de!not-for-mail
From: Silke Beismann <sbeisma@uni-molgen.gwdg.de>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Streptomycin-preciptation
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 12:07:39 +0200
Organization: GWDG, Goettingen
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <375F8E6B.16B5B20D@uni-molgen.gwdg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.76.70.64
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en

Hi ,

during my protein purification I have a lot of trouble to get rid of
nucleic acids. I have to use high amounts of Benzonase, dialyse
extensively, use several chromatography columns and so on. Now I read in
a paper a protocoll for streptomycin sulfate precipitation of nucleic
acids. Has anyone used this method before? Is it mild to the protein and
efficiently in respect of the nucleic acids?

Thanks for your answers,

Silke Beismann


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 10 06:41:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!remarQ73!remarQ-easT!supernews.com!remarQ.com!grolier!club-internet!not-for-mail
From: thesax@club-internet.fr (Loïck Le Dantec)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: GST-fusion degradation!
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 14:46:59 GMT
Organization: Club-Internet (France)
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <3766cfe2.17318286@news.club-internet.fr>
References: <01bea6f6$11907cc0$3754cc84@ribosome.bch.umontreal.ca> <375F8D2B.38C1A56C@dcb-glostrup.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pau-6-195.club-internet.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: front1m.grolier.fr 929025125 11883 195.36.133.195 (10 Jun 1999 14:32:05 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Jun 1999 14:32:05 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.01/32.397

>> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>>         I'm working with GST-fusion system.  For two of my fusion proteins I get
>> degradation of the fused part only while for others, ther is no degradation
>> at all.   This means that the only protein I can purify is the GST alone
>> since it has a better affinity for the column than the fusion protein.  I'm
>> not sure, but I think I see on a coomassie-stained gel that the degradation
>> occurs fisrt in the cells and continues during the course of the
>> purification. I use PMSF and Benzamidine.  Should I use more inhibitors?
>> The lysis method implies sonication, should I use other lysis methods?
>> 
>>         Is there any magical methods that would prevent degradation like reducing
>> the growth temperature or the inducing time? Would the MBP-fusion system be
>> a better system in case of degradation.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Francis R.
>
>--
There's some hints inGoeddel V.(1990) Systems for heterologous gene
expression. Methods in Enzymology, 185, 3-228.
Periplasmic export may be used (MBP-fusion with the pMAL-p2 system) as
a means to remove the protein of interest from the proteases.

hth
(sorry for my english)

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 10 09:23:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!carnaval.risq.qc.ca.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Denis LeBel" <dlebel@courrier.usherb.ca>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Promega's GeneEditor
Lines: 10
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Message-ID: <1rS73.7919$U4.333543@carnaval.risq.qc.ca>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 17:17:49 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 132.210.26.30
X-Trace: carnaval.risq.qc.ca 929035069 132.210.26.30 (Thu, 10 Jun 1999 13:17:49 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 13:17:49 EDT

Did anyone ever used the GeneEditor product (Promega) satisfactorily to make
more than one mutation on a single plasmid? If so, I would very much like to
contact this person.
Thanks
Denis LeBel,
Biology, University of Sherbrooke





From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 10 09:47:00 1999
Path: biosci!BILONG.COM!info
From: info@BILONG.COM (BILONG Transgenics)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: '99 ISAAST.
Date: 10 Jun 1999 10:47:44 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 253
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <375FF811.3021C350@bilong.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

'99 International Symposium on Aging and Antiaging Science & Technology
                      (with EXHIBITION)
             September 8-12, 1999  Beijing, China


Scientific Sessions
1. Biological Science
2. Clinical & Experimental Medicine
3. Health Care for the Elderly
4. Traditional Chinese Medicine in Aging & Antiaging

Invited Speakers:

I. Biological Sciences

Prof. Hajime Orimo, Japan
   # Osteoporosis - - - -Update

*Dr. Dazhong Yin, Sweden
   # Free Radical, Non-enzymatic Glycosylation & Lipofuscin

Prof. Zong-Yu Zhang and Tan-Jun Tong: Beijing, China
    # Progress in Research on Molecular Mechanisms of Aging

Dr. Xu Song, Beijing, China
    # The Demonstration of the Thesis of Nonenzymatic Glycosylation
Inducing
      Aging

*Prof. Ayala Hochman, Tel Aviv, Isreal,
    £¿ # Overview of Free Radicals and Neurodegenerative diseases

* Dr. Ron Kohen, Jerusalem, Israel
    # Reducing Equivalents in the Aging Process

Prof. Beka Solomon: Tel Aviv, Isreal
    # Therapeutic Antibodies, a New Approach in Treatment of Alzheimer’s

      Disease

Prof. Wen-Bin Li, Beijing, China
    # Aging-mimetic effect of D-galactose and its Mechanism

Dr. Zhong-Ming Wen, Suzhou, China
     Study of Aging Model in Rats

Prof. Biansheng Liu, Wuhan, China
    # The Relationship of Nutrition and Aging

Prof. Anna Xue, Beijing, China
   # Study on the Induction of Apoptosis by Superoxide Anion and
Inhibition
     Effect of Antioxidant Nutrient

Dr. Andrey I. Sukhodub, Kharkiv, Ukraine
   # Hypothetical Mechanism of Benzene Membrane Damage Action on the
Liver
     Microsomers£¨£¿£© from Different Age Rats

Prof. Ke-ji Chen, Beijing, China
   # Chinese Medicine and Health Preserving

Dr. Cai-min Xu, Beijing, China
   # The Changes of Membrane Lipids and Proteins in the Aging Process of

     Erythrocytes

Dr. Ping Wang, Wuhan, China
   # Theoretical and Experimental Research on the Relationship Between
Excessive Intake of Fat-sweet Food and Senility

II. Geriatrics

*Prof. David J.E.Callaway, New York, USA
   # Molecular Model of Alzheimer Amyloid Fibril Formation

Prof. Rui Han, Beijing, China
   # Recent Progress of Anticancer Drugs Originated From Plants in China

Prof. Shu-Li Sheng, Beijing, China
   # Advance in Pathogenic Mechanism of Alzheimer’s Disease

Prof. Yong-Jie Li, Beijing, China
   # Progress in Surgical Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease

Dr. Jinghe Li, Pharmacia & Upjohn, USA
   # A New Twist in Alzheimer Presenilins

Prof. Geng-tao Liu, Beijing, China
   # Protective Action of the Extract of Gingko Biloba (EGb761) Against
     Oxidized Low Density Lipoprotein-induced Damage of Endothelial
Cells
of New
     Born Calf Aorta.

Dr. Shi-xin Jin, Beijing, China
   # The Osteoporosis of Aged Male --74 Case Analysis

Prof. Yong-xing Ma, Shanghai, China
   # Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in the Aged and Preaged :
Comprehensive
     Mechanism and Intervention


Prof. Zhu-fang Shen, Beijing, China
   # The Hypoglycemic Effects of a Chinese Traditional Medicine (S 2),
One of
     the Glucosidase Inhibitors

Dr. Chun-qiang Guo, Beijing, China
   # Effects of 9804 on Learning and Memory of Mice

Dr. Ying Wang, Beijing, China
   # Investigation of 9804 on Some Amino Acids in Brain of Mice

Dr. Jiang-guo Chen, Nanjing, China
   # Studies on the Relationship between the Oxidatively Modified Low
Density
     Lipoprotein and the Aging of the Myocardial and Renal Cells in
Ovariectomized Rhesus Monkey.

Dr. Huaxi Xu, New York, USA
   # Cell Biology of Alzheimer’s Disease: Mechanism for Beta-amyloid
     Generation and Regulation

Dr. Lan Sun, Beijing, China
   # Effects of Coryfolia Extract in Prevention and Treatment of
Osteoporosis

Dr. Feng-hua Liu, Beijing, China
   # The Neuprotective Effect of Estrogen and Antioxidants Against
     Beta-amyloid Peptides(25-35) Induced Toxicity in Cultured Neuron
Cells

Dr. Wei Wang, Beijing, China
   # Research Report on Behavior and Therapeutic Mechanism of
Alzheimer’s-type
      Dementia Induced in Mice by Centrally Administered Beta-amyloid
Peptides

Yan Chen, Beijing, China
   # Therapeutic Effects of 764-3 on Alzheimer’s-type Dementia Induced
in Rats
     by Centrally Administered Beta-amyloid Peptides

Dr. Mengen Zhang, Beijing, China
   # Prevention and Therapeutic Effects of BuShenHuoXueFang on
Ischemia-type
     Dementia in Mice

Hu Zhu, Beijing, China
   # Combined Monitoring of CEA and TSA Value in Early Diagnosis of Lung

cancer

III. Traditional Chinese Medicine in Treatment of Diseases in the
Elderly

Dr. Jia-shi Zhu, California, USA
    # The Effect of Chinese Anti-aging Food/drug Corcyceps (CordyMaxTM
Cs-4)
      Improves Steady Bio-energy Status in Mouse Liver

Prof. Jun-tian Zhang, Beijing, China
   # Study on the Antiaging Effect of Ginsenoside Rg1 and Rb1

Prof. Junda Liu, Beijing, China
   # Modulate effect of Chinese Herbs on Immune Function of Lymphocytes
in the
     Elderly

Prof. Chunsheng Li, Beijing, China
   # Status of a Decade of Study on Anti-senility Drugs by Applying
     Life-experiment and Senile Animal Model in China

Zhi-xin Li, Beijing, China
   # Comparative Study on Modulating Effects of Different
Kidney-Supplementing
     Spleen-vigorating Stasis-Removing Decoctions on Immune Function and
Free
     Radical Metabolism in Old Mice

Prof. Zhi-qui Wu, Beijing, China
   #1. Molecular Study of Crystalline Modification for Preventing Senile

       Cataract with Chinese Herbs of Tonifying Kidney and Supplementing
Blood
   #2. A Study of Antiaging by Chinese Medicine Herbs of Tonifying
Kidney
       and Nurishing Blood from the View of TCM theory.

Dr. Guan-hua Du and Yong-hong Chen, Beijing, China
   # Effects of Salvianolic acid B on the Functions of Brain
Mitochondria in
     Aging Mice

Prof. Lin Li, Beijing, China
    # Effects of Chinese Herbs on dementia-like animal Models and Cell
Models

Prof. Jin-Zhou Tian, Beijing, China
    #1. The Influence of Compound Fhubarb Preparation on ChAT, AChE
        Activities and Ach Content of Aged Mice’s Cerebral Cortex and
Hippocampus.

or #2. Neuropsychological Findings Preceding Alzheimer’s dementia in
English
        Individuals with Cognitive Impairment.
    #3. Research into the Treatment for Vascular Dementia in China Using

        Traditional Chinese Therapies

Dr. Jiansheng Li, Zhengzhou, China
    # Effect of Daihuang Zhechong Pill of TCM on Kidney TXB2 and
6-Keto-PGF12 of
      Patients with Early-Stage Diabetic Nephropathy in the Aged.

Exhibition
The companies engaged in producing the instruments or reagents that may
facilitate the antiaging researches are welcomed and encouraged to
exhibit
their high-tech products. For whose interested in the exhibition, please

contact us at your earliest convenience.

Sponsor
Antiaging Science & Technology Society£¬ Gerontological Society of China

Organizers
Antiaging Science & Technology Society , Gerontological Society of China

China International Symposium Center for Sciences and Technology
(CICCST)

Supporters
Gerontological Society of China
Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology,  Peking Union Medical College,
Chinese
Academy of medical Sciences
Beijing Hospital and Gerontological Research Institute
(to be continued)

Contact:
*********************************************************
BILONG Academic Events
Add: 8 Nan Er Jie, Zhong Guan Cun, Beijing 100080, China
Box: P.O. Box 8734, Beijing 100080, China
Tel: 86-10-6256-0561, 6256-2226 Ext 211, 800-810-0797
Fax: 86-10-6253-2114
Email: BAE@bilong.com
Website: www.ciccst.org.cn/99ISAAST
*********************************************************


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 10 09:47:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!cyclone.bc.net!mongol.sasknet.sk.ca!news@mongol
From: "Michael R. Thompson" <mthompson@pbi.nrc.ca>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Streptomycin-preciptation
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 11:22:12 -0600
Organization: SaskTel
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <7josfm$ev05@mongol.sasknet.sk.ca>
References: <375F8E6B.16B5B20D@uni-molgen.gwdg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pbigate.pbi.nrc.ca
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3

I have used protamine sulphate to remove nucleic acids prior to isoelectric
focusing, or before purifying a recombinant enzyme. Dissolve protamine
sulphate powder in buffer and neutralize (it is quite acidic) before adding
to your protein prep. Use at a ratio (w:w) of about 1:30 of total protein.
Shake or rotate the vessel in the coldroom for about 1 hour, spin out the
precipitate afterwards. Seems to work well in both of my applications and
doesn't affect the activity of the enzyme. Protamine binds to all nucleic
acids, consequently it may also precipitate nucleic acid-binding proteins
(handy selective purification step in some applications). It may also
precipitate other proteins so you will have to check with yours.
Streptomycin precipitates ribosomes quite cleanly but doesn't remove DNA.


Silke Beismann wrote in message <375F8E6B.16B5B20D@uni-molgen.gwdg.de>...
>Hi ,
>
>during my protein purification I have a lot of trouble to get rid of
>nucleic acids. I have to use high amounts of Benzonase, dialyse
>extensively, use several chromatography columns and so on. Now I read in
>a paper a protocoll for streptomycin sulfate precipitation of nucleic
>acids. Has anyone used this method before? Is it mild to the protein and
>efficiently in respect of the nucleic acids?
>
>Thanks for your answers,
>
>Silke Beismann
>



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 10 12:05:00 1999
From: Cornelius Krasel <krasel@wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Subject: Re: Streptomycin-preciptation
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
References: <375F8E6B.16B5B20D@uni-molgen.gwdg.de>
User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990413 ("Endemoniada") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.36 (i486))
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 20:19:40 +0200
Message-ID: <sjvoj7.omj.ln@wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!news-lond.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!colt.net!news0.de.colt.net!blackbush.xlink.net!uni-erlangen.de!uni-wuerzburg.de!not-for-mail
Lines: 29

Silke Beismann <sbeisma@uni-molgen.gwdg.de> wrote:
> during my protein purification I have a lot of trouble to get rid of
> nucleic acids. I have to use high amounts of Benzonase, dialyse
> extensively, use several chromatography columns and so on. Now I read in
> a paper a protocoll for streptomycin sulfate precipitation of nucleic
> acids. Has anyone used this method before? Is it mild to the protein and
> efficiently in respect of the nucleic acids?

Our lab used this when purifying recombinant phosducin from E.coli
before applying the supernatant to a MonoQ column. The reference is
probably either
       Bauer PH, Müller, Puzicha M, Pippig S, Obermaier B, Helmreich EJM,
       Lohse MJ: Phosducin is a protein kinase A-regulated G-protein
       regulator. Nature 358: 73-76 (1992).
or
       Hekman M, Bauer PH, Söhlemann P, Lohse MJ: Phosducin inhibits
       receptor phosphorylation by the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase in
       a PKA-regulated manner. FEBS Lett. 343: 120-124 (1994).
However, since then the lab has switched to using his-tagged proteins,
simply because the protein purification is much more convenient (no HPLC
needed for same purity).

Hope that helps,
--Cornelius.

-- 
/* Cornelius Krasel, U Wuerzburg, Dept. of Pharmacology, Versbacher Str. 9 */
/* D-97078 Wuerzburg, Germany   email: phak004@rzbox.uni-wuerzburg.de  SP4 */
/* "Science is the game we play with God to find out what His rules are."  */

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Thu Jun 10 20:32:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.unimelb.edu.au!ludwignt-4
From: murphy_r@licre.ludwig.edu.au (Roger Murphy)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: how to calculate the molar absorption coefficient of a protein?
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 99 03:29:06 GMT
Organization: Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <7jq34u$n89$1@izvestia.its.unimelb.edu.au>
References: <7jm7qv$ing$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ludwignt-4.austin.unimelb.edu.au
X-Trace: izvestia.its.unimelb.edu.au 929075166 23817 128.250.186.193 (11 Jun 1999 04:26:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@news.unimelb.edu.au
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Jun 1999 04:26:06 GMT
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.0 Beta #0

Sure, go to the ExPassy web site and select the proteomics tools options.  
There you can either load in your own sequence (paste from a text file) or a 
database number if the protein of interest is known, and calculate all sorts 
of physicochemical parameters, using a number of tools.

Cheers,

Roger

In article <7jm7qv$ing$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>, "Bob" <robdebob@att.net> 
wrote:
>Is there any web site that would calculate the absorption coefficient of a
>protein on the basis of the number of tryptophans, tyrosins, Phe, disulfide
>bonds...
>
>Or if not, what is the formula?
>
>Thanks, Rob
>
>
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Murphy, Ph.D.
Biological Production Facility
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
Austin & Repatriation Medical Centre
Studley Road,
Heidelberg,  Vic. 3084
Australia.

Tel  61-3-94965463
Fax  61-3-94965436
Email Roger.Murphy@Ludwig.edu.au

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Jun 11 00:49:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!newsfeed.nacamar.de!newsfeed.nacamar.de!fu-berlin.de!server1.netnews.ja.net!pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!biosci
From: gussak@mail.agri.gov.il (Eugene Gussakovsky)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: how to calculate the molar absorption coefficient of a protein?
Date: 11 Jun 1999 08:08:53 +0100
Organization: ARO
Message-ID: <3760B659.50A47E8C@ias.agri.gov.il>
References: <7jm7qv$ing$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk 929084934 14976 193.62.192.80 (11 Jun 1999 07:08:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Jun 1999 07:08:54 GMT
X-Received: from alpha.netvision.net.il (alpha.netvision.net.il [194.90.1.13])
	by hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA02120
	for <proteins@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Fri, 11 Jun 1999 08:08:49 +0100 (BST)
X-Received: from mail.agri.gov.il (mariana.agri.gov.il [62.0.34.66])
	by alpha.netvision.net.il (8.9.3/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA18594;
	Fri, 11 Jun 1999 10:08:47 +0300 (IDT)
X-Received: from ias.agri.gov.il by mail.agri.gov.il (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/20May99-1040AM)
	id KAA0000021205; Fri, 11 Jun 1999 10:06:07 +0300 (IDT)
X-Reply-To: gussak@mail.agri.gov.il
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
X-To: Bob <robdebob@att.net>
X-CC: proteins@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Lines: 27



Bob wrote:

> Is there any web site that would calculate the absorption coefficient of a
> protein on the basis of the number of tryptophans, tyrosins, Phe, disulfide
> bonds...
>
> Or if not, what is the formula?
>
> Thanks, Rob

Hi, Rob,

Try a good paper by Pace et al. (1995) in Protein Science 4,2411-2423. But pay
attention that there are no any method to exactly calculate an extinction
coefficient. A calculated value can be used for estimation only (however the
estimation may be quite good!). I'd recommend to measure (i) using Biuret or
other absolute method of the protein concentration determination and (ii)
applying a procedure for light scattering subtraction at the absorption spectra
determination.

Best wishes
Eugene


---

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Fri Jun 11 18:28:00 1999
Path: biosci!GOLDRUSH.COM!geos
From: geos@GOLDRUSH.COM ("george sibbald")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Scientfic review article AFM in Biology 1999
Date: 11 Jun 1999 19:28:47 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 16
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <032f01beb47a$28300cc0$74c0dad1@sibbald>
Reply-To: "george sibbald" <geos@goldrush.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Review article on SPM in Biology! First draft, posted for comments/feedback
only, final version will be published by John Wiley in the book "Scanning
Tunneling Microscopy and related techniques" ed. D. Bonnell.

Author:  Prof. Stuart Lindsay, ASU

View the Article here.  http://green.la.asu.edu/index.html










From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sat Jun 12 20:30:00 1999
Newsgroups: alt.support.cancer,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.molbio.proteins
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news.new-york.net!uunet!ffx.uu.net!world!sphinx
From: sphinx@world.std.com (SPHINX Technologies)
Subject: Re: Your cancer cure!
Message-ID: <FD9060.CML@world.std.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 04:22:47 GMT
References: <37616cf1.109178972@news.mindspring.com> <18650-3762C6C5-319@newsd-611.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
Organization: SPHINX Technologies, Inc., Wellesley Hills, MA
Lines: 227
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:2083 bionet.molbio.proteins:14457

<Comments by .molbio readers are solicited!>

In article <18650-3762C6C5-319@newsd-611.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,
Nancy Luft <NancyLuft@webtv.net> wrote:
>normal healthy cells [and] tumor cells are undifferentiated cells.
>Embryonic cells in an embyro are also undifferentiated cells. Normal
>healthy cells are adult cells or differentiated cells.
>
>What is the difference between the two types?  Undifferentiated cells in
>neoplasms and embryos both lack the organelles of mature, healthy cells.
>Organelles are tiny structures of cells that allow a cell to carry on
>the functions of adult, mature, differentiated cells.  Undifferentiated
>cells are immature cells that can not carry on the functions of mature
>cells.

Presumably you mean that undifferentiated cells lack SOME of the organelles
of adult differentiated cells.  I would think that all cells would have
ribosomes, which are the organelles responsible for manufacturing proteins.
Or, as I have learned recently, more precisely, for translating the codes
for proteins in DNA (after its transcription into RNA) into the corresponding
protein.  The basic protein molecule is then, more often than not, "edited"
into a slightly different final form by subsequent chemical reactions.
(This can include splitting a protein into two or more sub-chains, so
"slightly" isn't always strictly accurate.)

>Cone Cancer Treatment, from what I gather not knowing much abut it, is
>very similar to what the Gerson Institute uses, in some basic ways.

This certainly seems to be correct, from my reading of descriptions of
the two methods.

>They both increase metabolism with the use of thyroid hormone, but I do
>not think it is the increaed metablism per se that actually  cures their
>patients.

Several people who have tried to apply Warburg's theory seem to think that
it is the competition for glucose that deprives the cancer cells of their
source of fuel.  However, they may not be understanding all aspects of
the process.

>The Pac Man Action of immune cells is their ability to eat up and
>destroy the bad guys, microbes, cancers, etc., it is called their
>phagocytic action that takes place inside of phagocytic immune cells.
>It is caused by a chemical reaction inside of tiny organelles or tiny
>sacs inside of those phagocytic immune cells called phagosomes.  That
>chemical reaction in those tiny phagosomes is called the Klebanoff
>Syndrome or The hydrogen peroxide + myeloperoxidase + halide   system.
>The halide is an iodine anion in the equation.  So the late Dr. Max
>Gerson fed his patients iodine to help their immune systems to work.
>
>In that above chemical equation is myeloperoxidase, which is an enzyme.
>Enzymes are made of proteins.

From what I have read, most enzymes ARE proteins. 

>Thyroid hormone is necessary in order for
>the human body to make hundreds of different kinds of proteins that act
>as enzymes, act as ion pumps (channels), and act as carrier proteins.

I would be interested to learn where thyroid hormone is needed in this
process.  After reading this statement or one like it in an earlier post,
I did some more reading and learned more about the protein synthesis
process.  In particular, I learned, as I noted above, that synthesis by
the ribosomes is not always, maybe even not usually, the end of the process.
So post-processing to edit the basic ribosome-produced protein into the
final form is one place I can imagine that thyroid hormone could be needed.

The other is kind of interesting.  It turns out that ribosomes are themselves
complexes -- it's not entirely clear from Stryer's "Biochemistry" if they
are actually molecules or strings of molecules bonded together in some way --
anyway they are made up of sections which are basically RNA and are called
ribosomal RNA, and sections which are proteins.  Already in 1994 when
Stryer's 4th Edition was published, the structure of ribosomes was known
in great detail and doubtless even more is known today.  Anyway, what I
found fascinating was to realize that

(1) Ribosomes are the "factories" that make proteins (or at least make
    the preliminary forms), and

(2) Ribosomes themselves are partly made up of proteins.

Which leaves us with a sort of "chicken and egg" problem, doesn't it?
I.e., how can ribosomes get made in the first place if ribosomes are 
needed to make protein, but ribosomes CONTAIN protein?  That is why
a bare planet with just some DNA could not have life spring up very easily.
As a minimum, I would think it would require a single cell containing
both the DNA and a ribosome, plus some amino acids floating around.

But that's digressing too much.  Back to my question -- can you fill me in
on how the thyroid hormone is used in the process of making myeloperoxidase?

>Best I have been able to research is that the human body can not make
>that needed myeloperoxidase enzyme unless it has enough thyroid hormone
>to do so.  So Gerson, and I was told also Cone, use thyroid hormone so
>their patients can make the needed myeloperoxidase enzyme that their
>patients must have in order for their phagocytic immune cells to attack
>cancers.
>
>From my research thus far, Gerson, and perhaps Cone, have the highest
>cure rates for incurable cancers, because of their use of thyroid
>hormone, etc..

This is VERY interesting especially in the light of your "do-it-yourself"
formula for getting the thyroid producing more thyroxin, because your 
method does NOT require the assistance of an M.D. (although supervision
would probably be wise).

>Folks with advanced cancers do not have a normal imflammation reaction
>like healthy folks because they immune systems refuse to work and often
>die as a result of infections because their immune systems refuse to
>work.  They have too much sodium and not enough potassium inside of
>every cell in their bodies, also, undoubtably caused by a lack of
>sodium-potassium ion pumps (channels) ... which is caused by a lack of
>thyroid hormone.  Their nervous systems do not work properly either
>caused by a lack of neurotransmitters, ie., dopa, dopamine, adrenalin,
>and noradrenalin, which are made from from an amino acid called
>tyrosine.  An enzyme in the liver converts the amino acids phenylalanine
>into the amino acids tyrosine which is then converted into those missing
>neurotransmitters.  Folks with cancers lack that enzyme to convert
>phenylalanine into tyrosine because they lack thyroid hormone that is
>necessary to make that enzyme.

Interesting...  I wonder if your method of souping up thyroid function
would also help people with phenylketonuria or those with difficulty
processing NutraSweet(tm)?  Which metabolizes into phenylanaline among
other things.

>When a person eats proteins the proteins get broken down into amino
>acids in the digestive system and then they enter the blood system and
>are taken the liver when they are deaminated, ie., in the presense of an
>enzyme the ammonia group is removed from the amino acids ... which later
>ends up in the urine and gives urine its smell of ammonia.  Folks with
>advanced cancers can not tolerate proteins much at all because that lack
>that enzyme needed to deaminate amino acids ... because they lack
>thyroid hormone which is necessary to produce that enzyme.

What you describe here must apply to amino acids which are not needed or
which are present in excess, because the body needs an "amino acid pool"
to be used to synthesize proteins.

>In order for the body to produce thyroid hormone it needs a bit of
>Vitamin E, some iodine, and the amino acid tyrosine.  Folks with
>advanced cancers lack the enzyme in their livers to convert the amino
>acid phenylalanine into the amino acid tyrosine, so they can not produce
>enough thyroid hormone.  Right they lack that given enzyme that is
>needed to convert phenylalanine into tyrosine because they need thyroid
>hormone to make that enzyme!  So many folks with cancers just spiral
>down hill until DEATH.
>
>Well, after reading, researching, going through endess hell and
>confusion, I learned the above information.  And I took 1000 mgs. of
>L-tyrosine I purchased at a GNC store, plus a bit of Vitamin E, never
>more the 100 IU's per day, and seven times the daily recommended dose of
>iodine, never take more then ten times the daily recommended dose of
>iodine or it shuts down your thyroid, and I got my immune system to
>function and wipe out cancers, and infections for me!

Interestingly, Adelle Davis in "Let's Get Well" claims that adequate
vitamin E intake can also facilitate REPAIR of damaged (scar) tissue
in the thyroid, the liver, the kidneys, and elsewhere.  I think she would
suggest a higher dose that 100 IUs.  Also, research reported a few years
ago by the Tufts University Center on Nutrition and Ageing said that
their data showed 800 IU/day to be "cancer-protective".  They also said
that preliminary results suggested that only 400 IU/day would also have a
cancer-protective effect but that they did not feel confident in stating
that result positively at that time.  All dosages should be scaled to the
patient's body volume, hence more or less to mass or weight, because the
substance be it drug or vitamin gets diluted throughout the volume of the
body.  But anyway, for average-sized people, I would think that 400 IU
would be a good dosage of vitamin E.  Did you have a reason for limiting
it to 100 IU?

> Yup, I got my
>thyroid to make its own hormone.  I now retain potassium, I can eat
>proteins again, etc., also.  If doing what I did, always take your pulse
>and temperatue and record it.  If your pulse gets too rapid or your
>temperature too high, stop temporary or reduce the downward the doses.
>I thought my approach much safer then using unsupervised thyroid
>hormone.

When giving a patient thyroid hormone supplements, a smart doctor will
usually not wait for the symptoms you mention, but will "read the body's
theromostat", i.e. prescribe a test for TSH, or Thyroid-Stimulating
Hormone, level in the blood.  This is the body's signal that asks for
more thyroxin to be made.  It would probably be the best way to determine
how your method was working, too, and to guide you in chages of dosage
of tyrosine/iodine/vit E.


>If you read a lot of health books you learn that both chloride and
>The best thus far I have come up with for  folks that have active
>cancers is to combine an anti egg diet with what I did or a combination
>of iodine and thyroid hormone ... the latter I do not like folks using
>without medical supervision, ie., using tyrosine, a bit of E, and some
>small amount of iodine is much safer as I did.

It would be interesting to see what would be the effect of oxygen in
context with thyroid extract.  My hunch, for what it's worth, is that
having an adequate oxygen level present would be helpful too, although
the thyroxin level might well also be necessary to stimulate the aerobic
cells to USE the oxygen.

>Gerson's book, A Cancer Therapy, used potassium supplements because of
>the lack of potassium in every cell in the body in his cancer patients.
>If you do that, just remember that potassium suppements will block the
>absorption of B-12 and cause anemia, therefore you must take B-12
>supplements with the potassium supplements.  Or eat lots of steam cooked
>potatoes, winter squash, bananas, orange or grapefruit juice, ... foods
>rich in potassium.
>
>Well, I must end this, but I hope you understand the pure science when I
>CAUTION cancer folks about eating things that reduce the amount of
>iodine in their bodies, now.

I for one appreciate your comments.  You've alerted me to the fact that
limiting CHLORIDE (and fluoride) intake may be more important than
limiting SODIUM intake!

And I applaud your efforts to understand, as you said, why these
dietary cancer therapy methods work when they do work, and why they
don't when they don't.  If we could only get the mainstream oncology
research community to look at this question instead of calling all
non-mainstream cures "spontaneous" remissions, we would begin to see
more progress toward a repeatable cure for cancer.

-John Sangster
 Wellesley Hills, MA

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Jun 13 01:00:00 1999
Path: biosci!internet!biosci!not-for-mail
From: biohelp (BIOSCI Administrator)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: BIOSCI/bionet miniFAQ & Fundraiser
Date: 13 Jun 1999 02:00:18 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 233
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199906130900.CAA21704@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

(LAST REVISION: 30-JUL-95)

This BIOSCI "miniFAQ" is designed to answer the questions that come up
the *most frequently*.  The main BIOSCI FAQ (Frequently Asked
Questions) is accessible on the World Wide Web at URL
http://www.bio.net/.

If you can not find an answer to your question in this or other
documentation, the BIOSCI technical support staff answers e-mail
queries sent to

		       biosci-help@net.bio.net

We can only answer questions about the use of the newsgroups and
mailing lists.  We unfortunately do not have the staff to do Internet
information searches or answer scientific questions.  Please post
those to the appropriate BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.


	Contents:
	--------
	0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!

	1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.

	2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.

	3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.

	4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.


0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!
------------------------------
BIOSCI's government funding has been expended, and we are now
operating solely from advertising revenue that we have raised from our
Web site at http://www.bio.net/.  We need just a few minutes of your
time to help us serve you.

You can do two important things which will take very little time for
you individually and will immensely help us continue to help you.

First, please use our WWW system at http://www.bio.net/ to access the
archives.  You can post or reply to messages via your Web browser as
described in item #1 below.  Your usage helps attract sponsors. If you
contact any of our sponsors, please be sure to thank them for
supporting BIOSCI. It is critical for them to get this feedback if
they are to continue their sponsorship for the long term.

Second, if you work for a company or organization that provides
products or services of interest to the biology community, please pass
this message on to your marketing or marketing communications
department or other appropriate group.  Please ask them to help
support BIOSCI by sponsoring our Web site and explain the uses and
benefits of the system to the biology community. If they are
interested, they can then contact us for further information at our
tech support address, biosci-help@net.bio.net.


1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.
--------------------------------------------------------
As of 10 December 1995, all BIOSCI/bionet full newsgroups are
accessible through the World Wide Web (WWW) at URL http://www.bio.net.
One can read and reply publicly or privately to both recent postings
and archived messages through one's Web browser if it is configured
properly to send e-mail.  Each newsgroup is equipped with its own WAIS
index.  The main BIOSCI home page also has access to the BIO-JOURNALS
Table of Contents database WAIS index and the BIOSCI user address
database described in another item further below.


2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.
-------------------------------------------------------
BIOSCI is a set of parallel USENET newsgroups (the "bionet" groups),
mailing lists, and a hypermail archive at URL http://www.bio.net/.
The same postings are distributed on all media (except for a small
number of mailing-list-only groups at net.bio.net).  Unfortunately it
is becoming a despicable practice on the Internet (by a few people out
to make a fast buck) to do automated mass postings to thousands of
newsgroups and mailing lists.  These attempts to grab free advertising
are refered to as "spams" in the usual, somewhat boneheaded, net
terminology.  USENET is more susceptible to this practice, and many
spams originate on the USENET groups and then are passed on to the
mailing lists.  However, spammers also get lists of mailing addresses
and hit these too, so neither medium is immune.

What should you do personally if you get junk mail?
---------------------------------------------------
Just delete it and move on without reading it further.  Filing a
protest is becoming increasingly useless because spammers are often
disguising the addresses where the messages are sent from.  Unless you
really understand Internet mail systems, your attempt at protest by
sending replies to the message will often end up being sent to the
address of an innocent person that the spammer is victimizing.

What can BIOSCI/bionet do to protect its newsgroups?
----------------------------------------------------
The only solution currently available is to moderate the newsgroup.
If this newsgroup is already moderated, then you are in good shape.
Moderation protects the USENET distribution from about 95% of the
spams that are being sent to date and protects the mailing lists
completely.  Moderation means, however, that someone has to take the
time to review each message before it goes out.  We have set up
software here that simply allows the moderator to forward to an
address at net.bio.net messages that (s)he wishes to have distributed.
This takes no more time than that needed to read the message and pass
it on, say about 1 min. per message.

Most newsgroups currently have a discussion leader who is responsible
for their newsgroup.  The discussions leaders and their e-mail
addresses are listed in the BIOSCI Information Sheet which is
available on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  If a newsgroup is being
hit with too many junk postings, please contact the discussion leader
for that group and see if there is interest in moderating the group.
Please do not assume that by simply posting a complaint to the
newsgroup itself, anyone on the BIOSCI staff will act on your
complaint.  With close to 100 newsgroups to run, the BIOSCI staff has
to rely on the discussion leaders of each newsgroup to report problems
directly to us at biosci-help@net.bio.net.

We will moderate any of our newsgroups if the discussion leader tells
us that the readership of the group wishes to do so and if a moderator
is willing to do the work.  For most BIOSCI/bionet groups, this
entails only a few minutes of work each day.

Moderating a newsgroup will resolve probably 95% of the junk postings
on the USENET distribution.  Unfortunately there are easy ways for
determined spammers to override the moderation mechanism on USENET,
but we can protect our e-mail subscribers from unwanted postings if
the newsgroup is moderated.  You can also access our newsgroups over
the WWW at URL http://www.bio.net.  While this Web interface will not
stop spammers from trying to post to the groups, this will give you
yet another way, besides using USENET news, to keep the junk out of
your personal mail files.  For those of you with local USENET news
systems, the Web interface will also give you faster access to new
newsgroups and recent postings.


3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.
------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE NOTE: The BIOSCI management does NOT act on
subscription/unsubscription requests that are posted improperly to the
newsgroups and mailing lists.  People who do this only bother everyone
on the lists to no avail.  Please be sure to follow the proper
procedures below.

Gory details are in the BIOSCI Information sheets on the Web at
http://www.bio.net.  Below we give an example utilizing the
METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list at both of our two BIOSCI sites:

Users in the Americas and Pacific Rim countries who use the BIOSCI
------------------------------------------------------------------
node at computer net.bio.net:
----------------------------

A) Determine the "listname" which is the <=8 character mail address
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   for the group.  These can be found in the BIOSCI Info. Sheet.  For
   the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS group the mailing address is
   methods@net.bio.net.  The listname is the portion of the address to
   the left of the @ sign, i.e., "methods".  The listname is used with
   the "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" commands illustrated below.

B) Mail all commands in the body of a mail message addressed to
   biosci-server@net.bio.net.  Do NOT send commands to the newsgroup
   posting addresses!  Leave the Subject: line blank, any text on it
   will be ignored.

C) In the body of your message put one or more of the following
   commands with an "end" command on the last line, e.g.,

   subscribe methods
   unsubscribe methods
   end

   Do NOT put your e-mail address or other text on these lines.  The
   server only allows you to cancel your subscription if the address
   on your mail header matches the address on our mailing list.
   Please ask for help at biosci-help@net.bio.net if your address has
   changed, e.g., if you know you are on the list but the server tells
   you that you are not a member.


Users in Europe, Africa, and Central Asia who use the BIOSCI node at
--------------------------------------------------------------------
computer daresbury.ac.uk (also known as dl.ac.uk):
-------------------------------------------------

To subscribe and unsubscribe to/from the BIOSCI lists, you need to
specify the full USENET newsgroup name with "bionet-news." prepended.
The USENET newsgroup names are listed in the BIOSCI Information sheet
on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  For the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list
the USENET newsgroup name is bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts, thus the
appropriate commands are

    sub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

    unsub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

These commands are included in a message addressed to mxt@dl.ac.uk,
NOT to the newsgroup mailing addresses.  As usual, include the text in
the body of the message as text on the Subject: line is ignored.

To unsubscribe from all the lists at the UK node, use

    unsub bionet-news

Please note that if the address in the list is different than the one
in your mail message header, you will not be able to unsubscribe by
this method. If you have problems, please mail biosci@daresbury.ac.uk.


4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Please take this opportunity to add your name, address, and research
interest information to the BIOSCI User Address Database if you have
not already done so.

You can fill out the address form directly through our Web page at URL
http://www.bio.net/adrform.html.

The address database is reindexed nightly for WWW access (the URL is
http://www.bio.net/).  If you are not directly on the Internet but can
reach it by e-mail, please use our waismail server to access the user
directory.  waismail use is described above.  You can also request a
user address form by e-mail from biosci-help@net.bio.net.

Please check your database entry from time-to-time to see if your
address information is still up-to-date.  Because of our limited
personnel resources, we ask that you resubmit a *complete* form to
revise your entry; we only replace complete entries and do not have
resources to edit old forms.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Sun Jun 13 22:20:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.direct.ca!newsfeed.concentric.net!newsfeed.clear.net.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail
From: "Ross Prestidge" <axolotl@ihug.co.nz>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: kuyfyfifkif
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 21:54:14 +1200
Organization: The Internet Group Ltd
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <7k26l7$222$1@newsource.ihug.co.nz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p18-max7.akl.ihug.co.nz
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4

fxcugtdc,f,yvf,fcdcdgt



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Jun 14 07:18:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newsflash.concordia.ca!pitt.edu!not-for-mail
From: pxpst2@vms.cis.pitt.edu (Peter)
Newsgroups: alt.support.cancer,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Your cancer cure!
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 11:11:39 -0400
Organization: University Of Pittsburgh
Lines: 349
Message-ID: <pxpst2-1406991111390001@pelli.pathology.pitt.edu>
References: <37616cf1.109178972@news.mindspring.com> <18650-3762C6C5-319@newsd-611.iap.bryant.webtv.net> <FD9060.CML@world.std.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pelli.pathology.pitt.edu
Mail-Copies-To: pxpst2@vms.cis.pitt.edu
X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4.4
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:2086 bionet.molbio.proteins:14461

In article <FD9060.CML@world.std.com>, sphinx@world.std.com (SPHINX
Technologies) wrote:

> In article <18650-3762C6C5-319@newsd-611.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,
> Nancy Luft <NancyLuft@webtv.net> wrote:
> >normal healthy cells [and] tumor cells are undifferentiated cells.
> >Embryonic cells in an embyro are also undifferentiated cells. Normal
> >healthy cells are adult cells or differentiated cells.

Normal cells may or may not be differentiated.  Those words have little to
do with each other.  For example, the bone marrow houses fully
differeintiated cells (ie osteoclasts, octeoblasts osteocytes and others)
it also houses blood precussor cells which are at various levels of
differentiation.  Embryonic cells are generally considered to be
undifferentiated when the embryo is still in the "early blast stages" but
once the somites appear they are now beginning to differentiate into
endoderm, ectoderm and mesoderm.  And depending on the location of the
cells, induction to diferentiate starts to happen by intaeraction of
Mesoderm with endo/ectoderm or any combination of layers.
This is a crude explination,BTW.

> >
> >What is the difference between the two types?  Undifferentiated cells in
> >neoplasms and embryos both lack the organelles of mature, healthy cells.
> >Organelles are tiny structures of cells that allow a cell to carry on
> >the functions of adult, mature, differentiated cells.  Undifferentiated
> >cells are immature cells that can not carry on the functions of mature
> >cells.

All organelles exsit within all cell types but there ratio to total cell
volume may change over time depending on the differentiaion state of the
cell.  For example, a resting B-cell will apppear small and condensed.  It
still has all the organelles but since they are not needed they "appear
without under a light microscope but can be seen with the electron
microscope.  Once the B-cell is stimulated, it enlarges greatly and
everything can be seen under a light microscope.  Once again this is a
gross oversimplification.
> 
> Presumably you mean that undifferentiated cells lack SOME of the organelles
> of adult differentiated cells.  I would think that all cells would have
> ribosomes, which are the organelles responsible for manufacturing proteins.
> Or, as I have learned recently, more precisely, for translating the codes
> for proteins in DNA (after its transcription into RNA) into the corresponding
> protein.  The basic protein molecule is then, more often than not, "edited"
> into a slightly different final form by subsequent chemical reactions.
> (This can include splitting a protein into two or more sub-chains, so
> "slightly" isn't always strictly accurate.)

Here you are correct.  All the organelles are there but enzymes required
to do some of the post translational modifications may not be present in
the imature cell.  For example, a hepatoblast(hepatocyte precurssor and I
am using this term lightly) does not express the enzyme responsible for
gamma carboxylation of coagulation enzymes. Therfore even though some
coagulation factor X is expressed at very low levels it is not gamma
carboxylated.  What is actually going on at this level is modulation of
transcription factors.  Whether or not a protein is expressed is dependant
on the existance of the proper transcription factors which will drive its
promoter.  Currently, scientist are striving to understand more about
transcription factors but we have a long long long way to go.

> 
> >Cone Cancer Treatment, from what I gather not knowing much abut it, is
> >very similar to what the Gerson Institute uses, in some basic ways.
> 
> This certainly seems to be correct, from my reading of descriptions of
> the two methods.
> 
> >They both increase metabolism with the use of thyroid hormone, but I do
> >not think it is the increaed metablism per se that actually  cures their
> >patients.

This is one way to treat cancer but will not work on all tpes of cancer
rather just a small subset of cancers.  TH is T3 which is a ligand to a
transciption factorcalled the thyroid hormone recepror.  Once T3 binds to
its receptor the complex then binds to a promoter element and cranks up
the production of various genes that have the proper regulatory sequence
in its promoter.  Since T3 is distributed by the blood it will act
systemically.  If this is inappropriate for the cell due to altered
metabolism or something else, then the cell will realize that something is
wrong and will trigger a suicide program and lead to cell death by
apoptosis.

I think it is important at this point to define what makes a cell
cancerous.  A cancer cell is a cell who has mutated genomic DNA.  In order
for the cancer to destroy the organism, it must learn many new tricks.  It
must learn how to live move, it must learn how to eat through basement
membranes, it must learn how to induce vasculatature, it must learn how to
move into the vasculature, it must learn how to survive in the blood, it
must learn how to get out of the vasculature and finally it must learn how
to live and grow in another site.  All in all many genes need to be hit
genetically as to allow their in appropriate expression.  I hope you are
realizing that cancer is a difficult thing to completly understand and it
is a very complex process.  I do not believe that any one " magic bullet"
exists to cure all cancers.  Most advanced cancers have very screwed up
DNA.  If you looked at the chromasomes, you would see many breaks and
repairs and chromasome pieces may be located in inapropriate locations.
This is all very cursory explination, if you want more info, I would be
happy to direct to it.

> 
> Several people who have tried to apply Warburg's theory seem to think that
> it is the competition for glucose that deprives the cancer cells of their
> source of fuel.  However, they may not be understanding all aspects of
> the process.

This is putting it mildly.


> 
> >The Pac Man Action of immune cells is their ability to eat up and
> >destroy the bad guys, microbes, cancers, etc., it is called their
> >phagocytic action that takes place inside of phagocytic immune cells.
> >It is caused by a chemical reaction inside of tiny organelles or tiny
> >sacs inside of those phagocytic immune cells called phagosomes.  That
> >chemical reaction in those tiny phagosomes is called the Klebanoff
> >Syndrome or The hydrogen peroxide + myeloperoxidase + halide   system.
> >The halide is an iodine anion in the equation.  So the late Dr. Max
> >Gerson fed his patients iodine to help their immune systems to work.

Immune cells are quite specific on what is a target.  Immune cells do not
just go out and kill.  And the phagocytic machinery/cells are different
then the cells that kill.  The cells that kill are either cytotoxic T
cells or NK cells.  In the case of T cell, there is a specific receptor
that identifies abnormal proteins and upon recognition, it starts to
perforate the cell and kill it.  Then the Phagocytic cells come along and
clean up the debris.  For NK cells it is not known how the target is
identified but it is specific and does pierce the membrane.  Current
strategies that want to use the immune system invlove the removing of T
cells from the patient and stimulating them in the precense of cancer
cells till one can be found that recognizes the cancer cell.  This cell is
then grown and reingected into to patient.  Variants of this involve the
the use of cytokines that stimulate the t cells in the persons body.  See
work by Michael Lotz at University of Pittsburgh.

> >
> >In that above chemical equation is myeloperoxidase, which is an enzyme.
> >Enzymes are made of proteins.
> 
> From what I have read, most enzymes ARE proteins.

All enzymes are proteins except for ribozymes.  But some interesting
enzymes exsist that are a compbination of Nucleic acid and protein(see
telomerase) and sine it is the belief of the scientific community that
telomerase is important to stabilizing the ends of DNA, it is VERY
important to cancer. 

> 
> >Thyroid hormone is necessary in order for
> >the human body to make hundreds of different kinds of proteins that act
> >as enzymes, act as ion pumps (channels), and act as carrier proteins.
> 
> I would be interested to learn where thyroid hormone is needed in this
> process.  After reading this statement or one like it in an earlier post,
> I did some more reading and learned more about the protein synthesis
> process.  In particular, I learned, as I noted above, that synthesis by
> the ribosomes is not always, maybe even not usually, the end of the process.
> So post-processing to edit the basic ribosome-produced protein into the
> final form is one place I can imagine that thyroid hormone could be needed.

Learn what T3 is and then think about he problem.  I stated above the
basics.  What you need to do is see what cells are responsive to it.  
> 
> The other is kind of interesting.  It turns out that ribosomes are themselves
> complexes -- it's not entirely clear from Stryer's "Biochemistry" if they
> are actually molecules or strings of molecules bonded together in some way --
> anyway they are made up of sections which are basically RNA and are called
> ribosomal RNA, and sections which are proteins.  Already in 1994 when
> Stryer's 4th Edition was published, the structure of ribosomes was known
> in great detail and doubtless even more is known today.  Anyway, what I
> found fascinating was to realize that
> 
Ribozomes are made of many proteins not just one that come to gether as
subunits.  For more info get a cell biology book.  I would suggest
Darnell, Lodish and Baltimores  "Molecular Cell Biology"

> (1) Ribosomes are the "factories" that make proteins (or at least make
>     the preliminary forms), and

Ribosomes are platforms where mRNA is read and corresponding tRNA can dock.
> 
> (2) Ribosomes themselves are partly made up of proteins.

Ribosomes are all protein but the RNA that dock there are not. :-)

> 
> Which leaves us with a sort of "chicken and egg" problem, doesn't it?
> I.e., how can ribosomes get made in the first place if ribosomes are 
> needed to make protein, but ribosomes CONTAIN protein?  That is why
> a bare planet with just some DNA could not have life spring up very easily.
> As a minimum, I would think it would require a single cell containing
> both the DNA and a ribosome, plus some amino acids floating around.

You are now moving into evollution and how it all came to be.  The current
theory is that RNA came first then DNA and then protein but this is just
theory and conjecture.  Remember what I mentioned above the RNA can act as
an enzyme and it is called a ribozyme.

> 
> But that's digressing too much.  Back to my question -- can you fill me in
> on how the thyroid hormone is used in the process of making myeloperoxidase?
> 
> >Best I have been able to research is that the human body can not make
> >that needed myeloperoxidase enzyme unless it has enough thyroid hormone
> >to do so.  So Gerson, and I was told also Cone, use thyroid hormone so
> >their patients can make the needed myeloperoxidase enzyme that their
> >patients must have in order for their phagocytic immune cells to attack
> >cancers.

see article:  Piedrafita FJ. Molander RB. Vansant G. Orlova EA. Pfahl M.
Reynolds WF. An Alu element in the myeloperoxidase promoter contains
a composite SP1-thyroid hormone-retinoic acid response element. Journal of
Biological Chemistry. 271(24):14412-20, 1996 Jun 14.
> >
> >From my research thus far, Gerson, and perhaps Cone, have the highest
> >cure rates for incurable cancers, because of their use of thyroid
> >hormone, etc..

This is highly speculative on your part.  I see no evidence this far to
say that the non specific poly nuclear leucocytes are the ones killing the
"cancer cells".
It is entirely possible that the T3 is acting on the cancer cell and
inducing oxidative stress on those cells and thus causing the cells to die
via apoptosis.
> 
> This is VERY interesting especially in the light of your "do-it-yourself"
> formula for getting the thyroid producing more thyroxin, because your 
> method does NOT require the assistance of an M.D. (although supervision
> would probably be wise).
> 
> >Folks with advanced cancers do not have a normal imflammation reaction
> >like healthy folks because they immune systems refuse to work and often
> >die as a result of infections because their immune systems refuse to
> >work.  They have too much sodium and not enough potassium inside of
> >every cell in their bodies, also, undoubtably caused by a lack of
> >sodium-potassium ion pumps (channels) ... which is caused by a lack of
> >thyroid hormone. 

Is it?  please explain your logic.

you can not just say that it A caused B and B caused C threfore the reason
for elevation of C is due to Z without proof.
T3receptor is a permiscous nuclear receptor that can pair with RXR, RAR
and others and bind to sp1 sites.  Which partner it binds to will define
the effect.  Therefore, how do you know it is not the partner to T#
receptor that is the culprit?


> >Their nervous systems do not work properly either
> >caused by a lack of neurotransmitters, ie., dopa, dopamine, adrenalin,
> >and noradrenalin, which are made from from an amino acid called
> >tyrosine.  An enzyme in the liver converts the amino acids phenylalanine
> >into the amino acids tyrosine which is then converted into those missing
> >neurotransmitters.  Folks with cancers lack that enzyme to convert
> >phenylalanine into tyrosine because they lack thyroid hormone that is
> >necessary to make that enzyme.

This is right and WRONG.  Metabolism is not so clear cut.  The body
prefers to get its amino acids from food and adsorbs them uniformly.  What
you are describing is a scavenger system which may or may not be used.
Also, if the enzyme is missing, it presumably is not being made and one
must first speculate that the the promoter of the enzyme is not being
properly stimulated which takes us back to transcription factors and which
ones are or are not there.
 
> 
> Interesting...  I wonder if your method of souping up thyroid function
> would also help people with phenylketonuria or those with difficulty
> processing NutraSweet(tm)?  Which metabolizes into phenylanaline among
> other things.
> 
> >When a person eats proteins the proteins get broken down into amino
> >acids in the digestive system and then they enter the blood system and
> >are taken the liver when they are deaminated, ie., in the presense of an
> >enzyme the ammonia group is removed from the amino acids ... which later
> >ends up in the urine and gives urine its smell of ammonia.  Folks with
> >advanced cancers can not tolerate proteins much at all because that lack
> >that enzyme needed to deaminate amino acids ... because they lack
> >thyroid hormone which is necessary to produce that enzyme.

Folks with advanced cancers.....were these cancers treated or untreated? 
Many chemothearapuetic agents severly impair liver function.  Thius if
someone has been treated then one would expect decreasedliver function.
> 
> What you describe here must apply to amino acids which are not needed or
> which are present in excess, because the body needs an "amino acid pool"
> to be used to synthesize proteins.

Most correct.

> 
> >In order for the body to produce thyroid hormone it needs a bit of
> >Vitamin E, some iodine, and the amino acid tyrosine.  Folks with

What they need is TSH (tyroid stimulating hormone) from the pituitary.

> >advanced cancers lack the enzyme in their livers to convert the amino
> >acid phenylalanine into the amino acid tyrosine, so they can not produce
> >enough thyroid hormone.  Right they lack that given enzyme that is

If that is so then one should be able to measure the tyrosine in the blood
and note a " marked" decrease.  I have not seen such data.  Do you have
it?

> >needed to convert phenylalanine into tyrosine because they need thyroid
> >hormone to make that enzyme!  So many folks with cancers just spiral
> >down hill until DEATH.

The rate limiting ingredient for TH production is iodine and TSH.  

> >
> >Well, after reading, researching, going through endess hell and
> >confusion, I learned the above information.  And I took 1000 mgs. of
> >L-tyrosine I purchased at a GNC store, plus a bit of Vitamin E, never
> >more the 100 IU's per day, and seven times the daily recommended dose of
> >iodine, never take more then ten times the daily recommended dose of
> >iodine or it shuts down your thyroid, and I got my immune system to
> >function and wipe out cancers, and infections for me!

Wooooooo.  Your are now treading into the danger zone.   First, I doubt
that the liver allows for the tyrosine to escape to the serum.  and if it
did, you may run into toxicity problems.
see : Yokogoshi H. Effect of dietary level of protein or methionine and
threonine on the amino acids and catecholamines in brain of rats fed a
high
tyrosine diet. Journal of Nutritional Science & Vitaminology.
31(5):519-31, 1985 Oct. 
or
Datta K. Ghosh JJ. Effect of dietary threonine supplementation on tyrosine
toxicity in the rat. Journal of Nutrition. 107(9):1575-82,
1977 Sep
Many more references can be found.  If I were you, I WOULD STOP
EXPERIMENTING ON YOURSELF.  You are putting yourself at risk and do not
have the knowledge base needed to create your own anti cancer therapy.  If
you want my opinion, eat lots of beans,  I have seen studies that show
that peaple with high intake of beans have low matastasis rates.  Remeber
that primary cancers do not kill it is the ones that get out that do.  

The rest was snipped because I could not take any more.

Please do not experiment on onesself without a doctor because it is a bad
idead is all I can say



Regards

Peter Pediaditakis
Dept of Pathology
University of Pittsburgh

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Jun 14 08:06:00 1999
Path: biosci!WSUNIX.WSU.EDU!arthurr
From: arthurr@WSUNIX.WSU.EDU (arthur roberts)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Site with many links to protein search and analysis
Date: 14 Jun 1999 09:06:45 -0700
Organization: Institute of Biological Chemistry
Lines: 47
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3765268B.BB524B42@wsunix.wsu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Art's Biotechnology Resource
----------------------------

The website can be linked by the following:

http://biotech.isCool.net

or

http://www.ahpcc.unm.edu/~aroberts

or

http://www.arc.unm.edu/~aroberts

This site allows easy access to hyperlinks and free software for
the biochemist, biophysicist and molecular biologist.  This site
is constantly evolving and expanding, so it can be easy to use,
reliable, and comprehensive. As of 6/13/99, many new links have
been added.  There have also been some new categories added:

Employment Opportunities: this is a list of the "searchable"
databases with jobs that are related to the biotechnology field.
If you know of any links that are related to employment,
please email me at arthurr@wsunix.wsu.edu

Best Biotechnology Sites: this is a list of the best biotechnology-
related sites in the world.  If you know of any websites that are
not on the list that would be considered the best, please email
me at arthurr@wsunix.wsu.edu

Bioethics/ Legal Issues:  provides information on the public's view
of biotechnology research and legal issues that concern the
biotechnology
community.  If you know of any other important sites related to the
legality of biotechnology or ethics (i.e. human cloning), please email
me at arthurr@wsunix.wsu

      Sincerely,
      Art Roberts
      (web designer)
      arthurr@wsunix.wsu.edu
(P.S. I reply to all emails that are sent, and I appreciate your
comments
and suggestions)



From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Jun 14 13:06:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!solaris.cc.vt.edu!news.vt.edu!portal.gmu.edu!news
From: Debbie Grippaudo <debbieg@ib3.gmu.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: ATCC Biotech Patent & Licensing Forum
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:54:20 -0400
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
Lines: 90
Message-ID: <37656BFB.6C6FCFEF@ib3.gmu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.174.206.133
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------F1B3D2CCE28D2303436486F7"
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en


--------------F1B3D2CCE28D2303436486F7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

17th Annual ATCC Biotech Patent & Licensing Forum

September 23 -26, 1999

Hyatt Dulles Hotel - Herndon, Virginia

The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and The Institute for
Biosciences, Bioinformatics and Biotechnology(IB3) at George Mason
University,  are proud to host the above conference.

Please refer to our WEB site at URL: http://www.ib3.gmu.edu (follow the
link to Conferences and Forums) for information on the meeting being
held September 23 -16 , 1999.  Following are just a few of the
distinguished speakers who'll be presenting at this cutting-edge
conference:

Maria Freire - NIH
Thomas Caskey - Merck Pharmaceuticals
Joan Leonard - Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Ian Pike - MRC, London
Karen Hersey - MIT
Jorge Goldstein - Stern, Kessler




Should you have any questions or need additional information,  please
contact our Conference Coordinator:

Deborah Grippaudo
IB3 - George Mason University
10900 University Drive, MSN 4E3
Prince William Campus
Manassas, VA  20110
703-993-8449
703-993-8460 (fax)
email:  debbieg@ib3.gmu.edu


--------------F1B3D2CCE28D2303436486F7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>

<h1>
<font size=+1>17th Annual ATCC Biotech Patent &amp; Licensing Forum</font></h1>

<h1>
<font size=+1>September 23 -26, 1999</font></h1>

<h1>
<font size=+1>Hyatt Dulles Hotel - Herndon, Virginia</font></h1>

<p><br>The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and The Institute for
Biosciences, Bioinformatics and Biotechnology(IB3) at George Mason University,&nbsp;
are proud to host the above conference.
<p>Please refer to our WEB site at URL: <A HREF="http://www.ib3.gmu.edu">http://www.ib3.gmu.edu</A> (follow
the link to Conferences and Forums) for information on the meeting being
held September 23 -16 , 1999.&nbsp; Following are just a few of the distinguished
speakers who'll be presenting at this cutting-edge conference:
<p>Maria Freire - NIH
<br>Thomas Caskey - Merck Pharmaceuticals
<br>Joan Leonard - Howard Hughes Medical Institute
<br>Ian Pike - MRC, London
<br>Karen Hersey - MIT
<br>Jorge Goldstein - Stern, Kessler
<br>&nbsp;
<br>&nbsp;
<br>&nbsp;
<p>Should you have any questions or need additional information,&nbsp;
please contact our Conference Coordinator:
<p>Deborah Grippaudo
<br>IB3 - George Mason University
<br>10900 University Drive, MSN 4E3
<br>Prince William Campus
<br>Manassas, VA&nbsp; 20110
<br>703-993-8449
<br>703-993-8460 (fax)
<br>email:&nbsp; debbieg@ib3.gmu.edu
<br>&nbsp;</html>

--------------F1B3D2CCE28D2303436486F7--


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Mon Jun 14 22:23:00 1999
Newsgroups: alt.support.cancer,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.molbio.proteins
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!remarQ73!supernews.com!remarQ.com!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!newsfeed.nacamar.de!newsfeed.tli.de!do.de.uu.net!uunet!ams.uu.net!ffx.uu.net!world!sphinx
From: sphinx@world.std.com (SPHINX Technologies)
Subject: Re: Your cancer cure!
Message-ID: <FDCurp.Inw@world.std.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 06:16:37 GMT
Bcc: sphinx
References: <37616cf1.109178972@news.mindspring.com> <18650-3762C6C5-319@newsd-611.iap.bryant.webtv.net> <FD9060.CML@world.std.com> <pxpst2-1406991111390001@pelli.pathology.pitt.edu>
Organization: SPHINX Technologies, Inc., Wellesley Hills, MA
Lines: 52
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:2087 bionet.molbio.proteins:14464

Hah!  We got a LIVE one!  Thanks very much for your knowledgeable comments!

In article <pxpst2-1406991111390001@pelli.pathology.pitt.edu>,
Peter <pxpst2@vms.cis.pitt.edu> wrote:
>
>...
>
>I think it is important at this point to define what makes a cell
>cancerous.  A cancer cell is a cell who has mutated genomic DNA.  In order
>for the cancer to destroy the organism, it must learn many new tricks.  It
>must learn how to live move, it must learn how to eat through basement
>membranes, it must learn how to induce vasculatature, it must learn how to
>move into the vasculature, it must learn how to survive in the blood, it
>must learn how to get out of the vasculature and finally it must learn how
>to live and grow in another site.  All in all many genes need to be hit
>genetically as to allow their in appropriate expression.  I hope you are
>realizing that cancer is a difficult thing to completly understand and it
>is a very complex process.  I do not believe that any one " magic bullet"
>exists to cure all cancers.  Most advanced cancers have very screwed up
>DNA.  If you looked at the chromasomes, you would see many breaks and
>repairs and chromasome pieces may be located in inapropriate locations.
>This is all very cursory explination, if you want more info, I would be
>happy to direct to it.
>

I find your description of the cancerous cell very interesting.  It
reinforces my impression that cancer is not the result of randomly-
altered genes, but is rather the result of purposeful manipulation 
of genes by some "purposeful" organism.

As one with a certain level of knowledge of "combinatorics", or the
art of mathematically counting complex things (and often using this
to estimate probabilities or expected frequencies of occurrence), I
find it very difficult to imagine how all the necessary FUNCTIONAL
mutations to explain what you just described could have happened
by chance in anything LIKE the current age of the universe.

As you probably know, there is a small minority of researchers in
the cancer research community who assert that there IS a cancer
organism which they can isolate from any cancer cell and show you
if you will only look.  (Dr. Virginia Livingston-Wheeler was one of
the better known.)

Your description certainly sounds like the "trail" left by a
purposeful organism, not chance alone!

Thanks also for all the other detailed comments.  It is going to take
awhile for me to digest all the new information, which I very much
appreciate.

-John S.


From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Jun 15 05:07:00 1999
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!howland.erols.net!portc02.blue.aol.com!pitt.edu!not-for-mail
From: pxpst2@vms.cis.pitt.edu (Peter)
Newsgroups: alt.support.cancer,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Your cancer cure!
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 09:01:14 -0400
Organization: University Of Pittsburgh
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <pxpst2-1506990901140001@pelli.pathology.pitt.edu>
References: <37616cf1.109178972@news.mindspring.com> <18650-3762C6C5-319@newsd-611.iap.bryant.webtv.net> <FD9060.CML@world.std.com> <pxpst2-1406991111390001@pelli.pathology.pitt.edu> <FDCurp.Inw@world.std.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pelli.pathology.pitt.edu
Mail-Copies-To: pxpst2@vms.cis.pitt.edu
X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4.4
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:2091 bionet.molbio.proteins:14467

In article <FDCurp.Inw@world.std.com>, sphinx@world.std.com (SPHINX
Technologies) wrote:

> I find your description of the cancerous cell very interesting.  It
> reinforces my impression that cancer is not the result of randomly-
> altered genes, but is rather the result of purposeful manipulation 
> of genes by some "purposeful" organism.

It hust appears "purposeful".  The only genetic hits that are noticed are
ones that give a cell some survival advantage over another cell.  For
example, the p53 gene which has the abilty to detect flaws in the DNA and
is responsible for halting the cell cycle so that DNA can be repaired.  If
this gene is turned into a dominant negative mutant then one will
accumulate mutations at a fast rate and more growth regulatory genes will
get hit and so on and so on...

Peter

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Jun 15 05:29:00 1999
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newsflash.concordia.ca!pitt.edu!not-for-mail
From: pxpst2@vms.cis.pitt.edu (Peter)
Newsgroups: alt.support.cancer,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Your cancer cure!
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 09:22:29 -0400
Organization: University Of Pittsburgh
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <pxpst2-1506990922290001@pelli.pathology.pitt.edu>
References: <37616cf1.109178972@news.mindspring.com> <18650-3762C6C5-319@newsd-611.iap.bryant.webtv.net> <FD9060.CML@world.std.com> <pxpst2-1406991111390001@pelli.pathology.pitt.edu> <FDCurp.Inw@world.std.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pelli.pathology.pitt.edu
Mail-Copies-To: pxpst2@vms.cis.pitt.edu
X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4.4
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:2092 bionet.molbio.proteins:14468

In article <FDCurp.Inw@world.std.com>, sphinx@world.std.com (SPHINX
Technologies) wrote:

> As one with a certain level of knowledge of "combinatorics", or the
> art of mathematically counting complex things (and often using this
> to estimate probabilities or expected frequencies of occurrence), I
> find it very difficult to imagine how all the necessary FUNCTIONAL
> mutations to explain what you just described could have happened
> by chance in anything LIKE the current age of the universe.

Why is it difficult?  Keep in mind that mutations that do not allow for
"selection" to occur are unnoticed and irrelevant.  Also, you must bear in
mind that certain genes are more important than others.  As I mentioned
earlier, the S phase (DNA sythesis phase) of the cell cycle is stoped by a
protien called p53.  If a mutaion occurs at the N17 ( I think that is the
right place) then a dominant negative mutant will be created.  And even
though you may still have another good copy of p53 (from mom or dad), it
will not work.  Now the mutation rate will accelerate.  And do not forget
that the population of cells in the human is big (in the order of
10e8-10e9 cells).  If one cell gets an advantage, then it will out grow
its neighbors and increase the odds of another hit.
Cancer researchers classify these growth genes as proto oncogenes (when
normal) and oncogenes (when abnormal) and they can either be tumor
suppressor genes(inhibit growth of normal cells) or tumor promoter
genes(promote growth of normal cells).
> 
> As you probably know, there is a small minority of researchers in
> the cancer research community who assert that there IS a cancer
> organism which they can isolate from any cancer cell and show you
> if you will only look.  (Dr. Virginia Livingston-Wheeler was one of
> the better known.)

That is complete and utter bullshit(pardon the english).  It is known that
virus can promote cancer.  And there is some belief that chronic
infections can possibly lead to cancer But the thought that an organism is
the cause of Cancer is total garbage.
What is interesting about the virus is that they have picked up small
chunks of DNA that code for proteins that regulate the "growth genes I
mentioned before.
> 
> Your description certainly sounds like the "trail" left by a
> purposeful organism, not chance alone!
> 
> Thanks also for all the other detailed comments.  It is going to take
> awhile for me to digest all the new information, which I very much
> appreciate.

What I have given you is the present Dogma regarding Cancer.  As a cancer
researcher, I am comfortable with saying that all cancer researchers that
I know believe that this is indeed the way Cancer works.

The current dream is that methods to determine which of the protooncogenes
have been turned to oncogenes and what drugs could be used to effect them.

BTW, clonal expansion of cancer cells has been proven in rodents and humans.

Regards,
Peter Pediaditakis

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Jun 15 06:34:00 1999
Path: biosci!agate!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed1.swip.net!swipnet!news.algonet.se!newsfeed1.telenordia.se!algonet!newsfeed1.funet.fi!newsfeed.sunet.se!news01.sunet.se!news99.sunet.se!umdac!umu.se!not-for-mail
From: Elisabeth Liu <bigqin97@student.umu.se>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Help
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 16:20:57 -0700
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <3766DFD9.6F66@student.umu.se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc1.climi.umu.se
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: hudsucker.umdc.umu.se 929455996 798 130.239.180.153 (15 Jun 1999 14:13:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@umu.se
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Jun 1999 14:13:16 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I; 16bit)

Hello,

Does anyone know where to get vasoactive intestinal polypeptide receptor
2 (VIP2) antagonist and/or agonist?

Thanks!

Elisabeth Liu

From owner-proteins@net.bio.net Tue Jun 15 07:00:00 1999
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.tli.de!blackbush.xlink.net!news-kar1.dfn.de!news.embl-heidelberg.de!news.dkfz-heidelberg.de!news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de!genius.embnet.dkfz-heidelberg.de!un691cs
From: CSC <un691cs@genius.embnet.dkfz-heidelberg.de>
Newsgroups: alt.support.cancer,bionet.molbio.gene-linkage,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: Your cancer cure!
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 16:34:47 +0200
Organization: University of Heidelberg, Germany
Lines: 61
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9906151619220.26254-100000@genius.embnet.dkfz-heidelberg.de>
References: <37616cf1.109178972@news.mindspring.com> <18650-3762C6C5-319@newsd-611.iap.bryant.webtv.net> <FD9060.CML@world.std.com> <pxpst2-1406991111390001@pelli.pathology.pitt.edu> <FDCurp.Inw@world.std.com> <pxpst2-1506990922290001@pelli.pathology.pitt.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: genius.embnet.dkfz-heidelberg.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <pxpst2-1506990922290001@pelli.pathology.pitt.edu>
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.gene-linkage:2093 bionet.molbio.proteins:14470

On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Peter wrote:

> In article <FDCurp.Inw@world.std.com>, sphinx@world.std.com (SPHINX
> Technologies) wrote:
> 
> > As one with a certain level of knowledge of "combinatorics", or the
> > art of mathematically counting complex things (and often using this
> > to estimate probabilities or expected frequencies of occurrence), I
> > find it very difficult to imagine how all the necessary FUNCTIONAL
> > mutations to explain what you just described could have happened
> > by chance in anything LIKE the c