From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 03 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!UKCC.UKY.EDU!EQUIGENE
From: EQUIGENE@UKCC.UKY.EDU
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: program
Date: 4 May 1994 08:11:02 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 7
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <199405041510.IAA26183@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

I would also like information on a computer program for systematics of
RAPDs.  Thanks.
Teri L. Lear
University of Kentucky
Dept. of Veterinary Science
Gluck Equine Research Center
Lexington, KY 40546-0099

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 03 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!TAUNIVM.TAU.AC.IL!VPMBJ%VOLCANI.bitnet
From: VPMBJ%VOLCANI.bitnet@TAUNIVM.TAU.AC.IL
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Computer program
Date: 4 May 1994 06:30:42 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 8
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <199405041330.GAA21485@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net


Dose anybody knows on a computer program (for mac or PC)
specific for analysis of population or systematics with
RAPD. If so, where can this program be obtain.

Amos Goaz
The Volcani Center, ISRAEL.


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 03 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!ABRSLE.AGR.CA!DEMEKE
From: DEMEKE@ABRSLE.AGR.CA
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: computer program for RAPD
Date: 4 May 1994 10:29:35 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 15
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <01HBXY0W06QA000HDV@GW.AGR.CA>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net


Hi:

The best way is to refer to the recent publications on RAPD analysis and 
classifications.  Some of the programs used so far are:

1. UPGMA-  Applied Biostatistics, Inc.,
2. NTSYS-pc-  Exeter Software, Setauket, N.Y.,
3. PCO-  one source- Dr. R.P. Adams, Baylor University, Plant Biotechnology 
Center, Waco, Texas, 76798-7372, U.S.A.

Good luck!

Tigst Demeke


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 04 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!CORNELL.EDU!MAL5
From: MAL5@CORNELL.EDU (Muhammad A. Lodhi)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: QTL analysis on woody plants
Date: 5 May 1994 06:17:25 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 10
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <199405051313.JAA20339@postoffice.mail.cornell.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Dear Friends
Has there been any report published or submitted on QTL analysis in woody
plants and/or pseudotestcross populations.  Any information would be highly
appreciated.
Thanks in advance
==========================================
Muhammad A. Lodhi
Program in Grape Breeding and Genetics
Cornell University


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 04 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!news.miami.edu!not-for-mail
From: kramer@oj.rsmas.miami.edu (Jack Kramer)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: QTL analysis on woody plants
Date: 5 May 1994 10:14:08 -0400
Organization: R.S.M.A.S.
Lines: 10
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <2qauvg$gnh@oj.rsmas.miami.edu>
References: <199405051313.JAA20339@postoffice.mail.cornell.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: oj.rsmas.miami.edu

In article <199405051313.JAA20339@postoffice.mail.cornell.edu>,
Muhammad A. Lodhi <MAL5@CORNELL.EDU> wrote:
>Dear Friends
>Has there been any report published or submitted on QTL analysis in woody
>plants and/or pseudotestcross populations.  Any information would be highly
>appreciated.

Try searching citations by Ray Schnell.  He has been doing QTL analyses
with RAPDS on tropical fruit crop trees for several years.


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Thu May 05 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!daresbury!trane.uninett.no!sunic!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!transfer.stratus.com!bigboote.WPI.EDU!wpi.WPI.EDU!jbagshaw
From: jbagshaw@wpi.WPI.EDU (Joseph C. Bagshaw)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: A grinding problem
Date: 6 May 1994 19:48:20 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Lines: 1
Message-ID: <2qe6u4$976@bigboote.WPI.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:14024 bionet.molbio.rapd:552



From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 08 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!PHIBRED.COM!murrayian
From: murrayian@PHIBRED.COM (IAN MURRAY)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Use of PCR for chromosome walking?
Date: 9 May 1994 11:35:42 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 26
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <9405091836.AA21543@gw1.phibred.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hello Netters,

I have a large primer, about 1-2kb and wish t use it in PCR reactions
to amplify large regions of DNA (about 10kb or more).  In this way we 
could chromosome walk.  Here is the crunch>

1)  How can I increase the stringency of binding of such a large piece of 
  DNA???
2) Are there any thermocyclers, programmes, or 
reagent concentrations (or
polymerase enzyme) that would enable this to be done?

3) With such large pieces of synthetic DNA, is the decrease in efficiency
greater than in normal PCR?

4) Does the final product become too viscous, and decrease mixing ?


If anyone has suggestions, references or helping hints, I would be greatly
appreciative.  It would save my coleagues and I a lot of time.

Yours Sincerely,

Ian Murray

Murrayian@phibred.com

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 08 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!UNAMVM1.DGSCA.UNAM.MX!carvalho
From: carvalho@UNAMVM1.DGSCA.UNAM.MX (Carvalho Torres Alexandro cassio-UACPYP)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: RAPD CLONING
Date: 9 May 1994 14:13:24 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 13
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9405091522.E22826-0100000@unamvm1.dgsca.unam.mx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net


Hi,
At the moment I am intending to clone a rapd fragment of 1.6Kb, we have 
some difficult. What is the most pratical tip to cloning this band. What 
is the strategy used by the people that cloned RAP fragments. 
Thanks.
######################################################
Alexandro C.T. Carvalho
Instituto Nacional de la Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
Mexico, DF
FAX 655 9675
#######################################################


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 08 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!MERCURY.UARK.EDU!DRHOADS
From: DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Doug Rhoads")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: RAPD CLONING
Date: 9 May 1994 14:37:02 -0700
Organization: University of Arkansas
Lines: 27
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <D707FA356E@uamercury.uark.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

>To:             rapd@net.bio.net
>From:           carvalho@unamvm1.dgsca.unam.mx (Carvalho Torres Alexandro cassio-UACPYP)
>Subject:        RAPD CLONING
>Date sent:      9 May 1994 14:13:24 -0700

>
>Hi,
>At the moment I am intending to clone a rapd fragment of 1.6Kb, we have
>some difficult. What is the most pratical tip to cloning this band. What
>is the strategy used by the people that cloned RAP fragments.
>Thanks.
>######################################################
>Alexandro C.T. Carvalho
>Instituto Nacional de la Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
>Mexico, DF
>FAX 655 9675
>#######################################################

The method we prefer to use is resolution on an agarose gel,  excise the 
band, rinse for 5-10 minutes in dH2O, soak for several hours in 100ul of 
H2O or low EDTA buffer, reamplify using the same primer on 2ul of eluate, 
and then ligate into a PCR cloning vector such as pGEMT from Promega.

Doug Rhoads                  || Dept. of Biological Sciences
drhoads@mercury.uark.edu     || 601 Science Engineering
drhoads@uafsysb.uark.edu     || University of Arkansas
501-575-3251                 || Fayetteville, AR 72701

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 08 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!MERCURY.UARK.EDU!DRHOADS
From: DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Doug Rhoads")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Use of PCR for chromosome walking?
Date: 9 May 1994 12:09:36 -0700
Organization: University of Arkansas
Lines: 34
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <D491D5328B@uamercury.uark.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

>To:             rapd@net.bio.net
>From:           murrayian@phibred.com (IAN MURRAY)
>Subject:        Use of PCR for chromosome walking?
>Date sent:      9 May 1994 11:35:42 -0700

>Hello Netters,
>I have a large primer, about 1-2kb and wish t use it in PCR reactions
>to amplify large regions of DNA (about 10kb or more).  In this way we
>could chromosome walk.  Here is the crunch>
>1)  How can I increase the stringency of binding of such a large piece of
>  DNA???
>2) Are there any thermocyclers, programmes, or
>reagent concentrations (or
>polymerase enzyme) that would enable this to be done?
>3) With such large pieces of synthetic DNA, is the decrease in efficiency
>greater than in normal PCR?
>4) Does the final product become too viscous, and decrease mixing ?
>If anyone has suggestions, references or helping hints, I would be greatly
>appreciative.  It would save my coleagues and I a lot of time.
>
>Yours Sincerely,
>Ian Murray    Murrayian@phibred.com
>
I am not sure why anyone would want to try and use 1kb primers??  My guess 
is that you actually have 1kbp dsDNA fragments and you want to amplify the 
region between them??  Just about the maximum size primer you should 
want is around 25-30 bases depending on the CG content.  At 50%CG most 
30mers have a Tm of >70C.  90C melts anything but you have to go down to 
70-72 for the Taq enzyme to function maximally.

Doug Rhoads                  || Dept. of Biological Sciences
drhoads@mercury.uark.edu     || 601 Science Engineering
drhoads@uafsysb.uark.edu     || University of Arkansas
501-575-3251                 || Fayetteville, AR 72701

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 09 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!MERCURY.UARK.EDU!DRHOADS
From: DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Doug Rhoads")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: RAPD CLONING
Date: 10 May 1994 07:47:58 -0700
Organization: University of Arkansas
Lines: 56
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <E835092F6C@uamercury.uark.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

>On 9 May 1994, Doug Rhoads wrote:
>
>> >
>> >Hi,
>> >At the moment I am intending to clone a rapd fragment of 1.6Kb, we have
>> >some difficult. What is the most pratical tip to cloning this band. What
>> >is the strategy used by the people that cloned RAP fragments.
>> >Thanks.
>> >######################################################
>> >Alexandro C.T. Carvalho
>> 
>> The method we prefer to use is resolution on an agarose gel,  excise the 
>> band, rinse for 5-10 minutes in dH2O, soak for several hours in 100ul of 
>> H2O or low EDTA buffer, reamplify using the same primer on 2ul of eluate, 
>> and then ligate into a PCR cloning vector such as pGEMT from Promega.
>> 
>> Doug Rhoads                  || Dept. of Biological Sciences
>> 
>Dear Dr. Hoads,
>I try to dp this but I can't success, because I didn't amplify the 
>fragment of 1.6 Kb. Exist some special program to amplify this fragment. 
>I use the follow program.
>94C...........10 sec         X 35c
>36C...........30 sec
>72C...........1 min
>You don't fill in your band or make a specila treatment the plasmid, like 
>alcaline phosphatase reaction.
>Please if you have some tips, send to me. I will very happy with more 
>information.
>Thanks a lot. Alexandro Carvalho
>
I would guess that when you re-amplified you got several of the other 
bands as well.  One thing you can do is go to anneals at 42-45C since by 
now you have a perfect match on the termini.  Also you shouldn't need to 
run more than 20-25 cycles.  You may also want to consider going to an 
acrylamide gel for better resolution of you band.  A 4% gel from 39:1 
acryl:MBA should work even for a 1.6 kbp band.

As far as the plasmid, you need something with a EcoRV site in the 
multi-cloning site in a LacZ gene.  We have used pGEM5Zf from Promega.  
Digest with EcoRV and then incubate with several units of Taq Pol and ONLY 
dTTP to add a single T to the 3' ends (not efficient but can work).  The 
plasmid is then ligated to the PCR product which naturally is A tailed by 
the Taq Pol.  Transfect into XL1 blue or other suitable host and select 
with Amp.  Color determination with Xgal IPTG should identify colonies 
with inserts (white).  Generally we expect about 1% white colonies.  If we 
use the pGEMT vector from Promega we get more like 10% whites.  I guess 
they do a better job than we do.

Standard disclaimer that I am not associated with or remunerated by any 
company mentioned above.

Doug Rhoads                  || Dept. of Biological Sciences
drhoads@mercury.uark.edu     || 601 Science Engineering
drhoads@uafsysb.uark.edu     || University of Arkansas
501-575-3251                 || Fayetteville, AR 72701

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 09 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!UNAMVM1.DGSCA.UNAM.MX!carvalho
From: carvalho@UNAMVM1.DGSCA.UNAM.MX (Carvalho Torres Alexandro cassio-UACPYP)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: RAPD CLONING
Date: 9 May 1994 19:45:59 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 46
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9405092026.A27265-0100000@unamvm1.dgsca.unam.mx>
References: <D707FA356E@uamercury.uark.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net



On 9 May 1994, Doug Rhoads wrote:

> >To:             rapd@net.bio.net
> >From:           carvalho@unamvm1.dgsca.unam.mx (Carvalho Torres Alexandro cassio-UACPYP)
> >Subject:        RAPD CLONING
> >Date sent:      9 May 1994 14:13:24 -0700
> 
> >
> >Hi,
> >At the moment I am intending to clone a rapd fragment of 1.6Kb, we have
> >some difficult. What is the most pratical tip to cloning this band. What
> >is the strategy used by the people that cloned RAP fragments.
> >Thanks.
> >######################################################
> >Alexandro C.T. Carvalho
> >Instituto Nacional de la Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
> >Mexico, DF
> >FAX 655 9675
> >#######################################################
> 
> The method we prefer to use is resolution on an agarose gel,  excise the 
> band, rinse for 5-10 minutes in dH2O, soak for several hours in 100ul of 
> H2O or low EDTA buffer, reamplify using the same primer on 2ul of eluate, 
> and then ligate into a PCR cloning vector such as pGEMT from Promega.
> 
> Doug Rhoads                  || Dept. of Biological Sciences
> drhoads@mercury.uark.edu     || 601 Science Engineering
> drhoads@uafsysb.uark.edu     || University of Arkansas
> 501-575-3251                 || Fayetteville, AR 72701
> 
> 
Dear Dr. Hoads,
I try to dp this but I can't success, because I didn't amplify the 
fragment of 1.6 Kb. Exist some special program to amplify this fragment. 
I use the follow program.
94C...........10 sec         X 35c
36C...........30 sec
72C...........1 min
You don't fill in your band or make a specila treatment the plasmid, like 
alcaline phosphatase reaction.
Please if you have some tips, send to me. I will very happy with more 
information.
Thanks a lot. Alexandro Carvalho


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 09 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!PHIBRED.COM!huangb
From: huangb@PHIBRED.COM (Bin Huang (905)8464446)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: please subscribe me
Date: 10 May 1994 07:40:57 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 1
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <9405101447.AA16774@gw1.phibred.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

    Please subscribe.  HUANGB@PHIBRED.COM

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 09 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!sfu.ca!corley
From: corley@sfu.ca ("Graham Corley-Smith")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: RE: Use of PCR for chromosome walking?
Date: 9 May 1994 21:54:11 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 45
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <75015.corley@sfu.ca>
Reply-To: corley@sfu.ca
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

In Message 9 May 1994 11:35:42 -0700,
  murrayian@phibred.com (IAN MURRAY) writes:

>Hello Netters,
>
>I have a large primer, about 1-2kb and wish t use it in PCR reactions
>to amplify large regions of DNA (about 10kb or more).  In this way we 
>could chromosome walk.  Here is the crunch>
>
>1)  How can I increase the stringency of binding of such a large piece of 
>  DNA???
>2) Are there any thermocyclers, programmes, or 
>reagent concentrations (or
>polymerase enzyme) that would enable this to be done?
>
>3) With such large pieces of synthetic DNA, is the decrease in efficiency
>greater than in normal PCR?
>
>4) Does the final product become too viscous, and decrease mixing ?
>
>
>If anyone has suggestions, references or helping hints, I would be greatly
>appreciative.  It would save my coleagues and I a lot of time.
>
>Yours Sincerely,
>
>Ian Murray
>
>Murrayian@phibred.com

Have you seen the article entitled 'Long PCR' Leaps Into Larger DNA
Sequences, that was published in Science 263:1564-1565 (March 18, 1994)?
   Graham
  ________________
Graham E. Corley-Smith
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
Biological Sciences Department
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C.,
V5A 1S6
Canada
Phone: (604) 291-3021
Fax:   (604) 291-5583



From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 09 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!EU.net!uunet!panix!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!jobone!lynx.unm.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!babbage.ece.uc.edu!ucbeh!rogstad
From: rogstad@ucbeh.san.uc.edu
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: JOB: EPA POSTDOC: PLANT POPULATION GENETICS
Message-ID: <1994May9.231550.7302@ucbeh>
Date: 9 May 94 23:15:50 EST
Distribution: world
Organization: University of Cincinnati
Lines: 29


POSTDOCTORAL POSITION:  PLANT MOLECULAR POPULATION
GENETICIST Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education Research
Fellowship tenable at the Department of Biological Sciences, University of
Cincinnati, and sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory - Cincinnati.  The position
is available immediately and is funded for two years, although application
for extension will be expected.  The research involves all or part of the
following:
*      Investigations, utilizing DNA variation, of effects of anthropogenic
       disturbance on population genetics of selected plant species.
*      Learning, and developing further, methods to investigate genetic
       diversity of selected plant species.  This may involve the use of
       microsatellite, minisatellite, RFLPS, or RAPD analyses.
*      Working with statistical analyses to optimize methods for data
       analysis.
*      Collecting and analyzing DNA variation of field samples from
       impacted and control field sites.

QUALIFICATIONS:  Applicants must have a Ph.D. degree by the time
of appointment.  Individuals with extensive experience in molecular
population genetics including field botany skills, plant DNA extraction,
RFLP Southern hybridization techniques, PCR methodology, and data
analysis will be preferred.

APPLICATION:  Send curriculum vitae, brief statement of research
experience and goals, and list of three references (with phone numbers)
to S. Rogstad, Biological Sciences ML6, University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45229-0006.

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 10 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!EU.net!Austria.EU.net!newsfeed.ACO.net!info.univie.ac.at!lab8486.abc.univie.ac.at!ma
From: ma@ABC.univie.ac.at (Manuel Simon)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: RAPD CLONING
Date: Wed, 11 May 1994 18:28:30
Organization: Inst. Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology
Lines: 39
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <ma.30.00127A33@ABC.univie.ac.at>
References: <E835092F6C@uamercury.uark.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lab8486.abc.univie.ac.at
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]

In article <E835092F6C@uamercury.uark.edu> DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Doug Rhoads") writes:
>From: DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Doug Rhoads")
>Subject: Re: RAPD CLONING
>Date: 10 May 1994 07:47:58 -0700

High, 
some remarks:

>I would guess that when you re-amplified you got several of the other 
>bands as well.  One thing you can do is go to anneals at 42-45C since by 
>now you have a perfect match on the termini.  Also you shouldn't need to 
>run more than 20-25 cycles.  

If you do so, of course you could get unspecific internal priming and 
therefore shorter fragments.  


>As far as the plasmid, you need something with a EcoRV site in the 
>multi-cloning site in a LacZ gene.  We have used pGEM5Zf from Promega.  
>Digest with EcoRV and then incubate with several units of Taq Pol and ONLY 
>dTTP to add a single T to the 3' ends (not efficient but can work).  The 
>plasmid is then ligated to the PCR product which naturally is A tailed by 
>the Taq Pol.  Transfect into XL1 blue or other suitable host and select 
>with Amp.  Color determination with Xgal IPTG should identify colonies 
>with inserts (white).  Generally we expect about 1% white colonies.  If we 
>use the pGEMT vector from Promega we get more like 10% whites.  I guess 
>they do a better job than we do.

There are also other sites available which cut blunt ended (e.g. SmaI) which 
are usually in all commercial vectors. The main problem is, that Taq 
polymerase attaches a 3´ protruding nucleotide to the synthesized strand and 
therefore these fragments are not so easy to ligate. If you are not successful 
with the protocol above try to polish the PCR fragment with T4-DNA polymerase 
in the presence of 100 uM dNTP. Then degradation shall stop at the beginning 
of double strand.

Good luck

Manuel

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 10 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!BRADLEY.BRADLEY.EDU!rrs
From: rrs@BRADLEY.BRADLEY.EDU (Robert Stephens)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: computer program for systematics
Date: 11 May 1994 08:42:36 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 7
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <9405111543.AA20416@bradley.bradley.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

For the mac try getting a copy of PAUP 3.1.1 from 
swofford@onyx.si.edu and for the pc try getting a copy of HENNIG86 
1.5 from Steve Farris at State Unmiversity of New York Stony Brook 
.  Don't know Farris' e-mail or complete address.  Also, R. Page 
has a pc program called Component (?).  Last I read he was affiliated 
with the British Museum.  Hope this helps.


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 10 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!AGRADM.Lan.McGill.CA!MATHER-1
From: MATHER-1@AGRADM.Lan.McGill.CA ("DM-Lab-1")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Help
Date: 11 May 1994 14:35:59 -0700
Organization: McGill University, Macdonald Campus
Lines: 2
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <199405112136.RAA06935@sifon.CC.McGill.CA>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Subscribe
Help

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 10 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!PHIBRED.COM!murrayian
From: murrayian@PHIBRED.COM (IAN MURRAY)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Failing RAPD reactions
Date: 11 May 1994 11:07:19 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 43
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <9405111809.AA24930@gw1.phibred.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

>From:           murrayian@phibred.com (IAN MURRAY)
>Subject:        RAPD primer eqaution
>Date sent:      22 Apr 1994 12:23:58 -0700

>Hello,
>
>
>
>On another note............
>
>I have used the 96 well plate MJ PTC100 thermocycler for a long time now,
>constantly ((6mo).  It now does not work and the reair service said that
>there was nothing wrong with it.  The same reagents work on another
>thermocycler that we use (Ericomp using 0.5 ul tubes) to yield RAPD
>products.  Simultaneous experiments showed that the MJ just did not work for
>RAPD and PCR.  Does anyone have an idea of what is wrong??

Our Idaho did this to us and we solved the problem by lowering the 
denature temp to 90C.  We attributed it to overshoot when the room was 
warmer.

Doug Rhoads                  || Dept. of Biological Sciences
drhoads@mercury.uark.edu     || 601 Science Engineering
drhoads@uafsysb.uark.edu     || University of Arkansas
501-575-3251                 || Fayetteville, AR 72701

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Mike@mj.com  suggested that the 96 well round bottom plates were at
fault.  A suggestion was to wash them with BSA, so that the Polymerase would
not be bound to the plate.

I have not yet tried th above, but if anyone has faile RAPD reactions, PCR
as well and has ruled out the reagents (and mineral oil) as the cause..... The
plates may be the culprit.


Murrayian@phibred.com

Ian Murray
Pioneer Hi-Bred




From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 10 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!VM.CC.FAMU.EDU!XQU
From: XQU@VM.CC.FAMU.EDU
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: (none)
Date: 11 May 1994 08:37:09 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 1
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <199405111537.IAA12879@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Please subscribe me.

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 10 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: Julian Paul Robinson <jpr@st-andrews.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Tm and Operon Technologies
Date: 11 May 1994 15:24:54 +0100
Lines: 14
Sender: daemon@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <2qqprm$dc4@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: Julian Paul Robinson <jpr@st-andrews.ac.uk>
Original-Sender: Julian Paul Robinson <jpr@uk.ac.st-andrews>
Original-To: rapd@dl.ac.uk

Does any one out-there know how to calculate
Tm for primers of 10 bp??

Also, does anyone know the address/fax no.
of Operon Technologies, Inc. 
(or distributor for the UK)

:-)

Julian





From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 11 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!PHIBRED.COM!murrayian
From: murrayian@PHIBRED.COM (IAN MURRAY)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: 'Long PCR' : leapds into larger DNA sequences
Date: 12 May 1994 12:48:42 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 15
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <9405121951.AA22481@gw1.phibred.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hello,

Has everyone read the articl 'long PCR' Leaps into larger DNA sequences in
Science Vol 263 pp 1564-1565 (18 March 1994) ?  In summary, long PCR
products were produced (20 - 45 Kb) by altering either the polymerases or
the PCR reagents.  

However, I heard through the grapevine that it has not been reproduced. 
Has anyone tried it ?  If anyone has comments or further references, they
will be appreciated.


Murrayian@phibred.com

Ian Murray

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 11 23:00:00 1994
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!utnut!utzoo!mes
From: mes@zoo.toronto.edu (Mark Siddall)
Subject: Re: computer program for systematics
Message-ID: <CpoCp6.BML@zoo.toronto.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 May 1994 05:31:53 GMT
Distribution: bionet
References: <9405111543.AA20416@bradley.bradley.edu>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
Lines: 45

In article <9405111543.AA20416@bradley.bradley.edu> rrs@BRADLEY.BRADLEY.EDU (Robert Stephens) writes:
>For the mac try getting a copy of PAUP 3.1.1 from 
>swofford@onyx.si.edu and for the pc try getting a copy of HENNIG86 
>1.5 from Steve Farris at State Unmiversity of New York Stony Brook 

No go!!!  Farris hasn't been at Stoney Brook for about a year or so.  
He's in Sweden somewhere.  Stoney Brook may still distribute Hennig86
though I don't know.

>.  Don't know Farris' e-mail or complete address.  Also, R. Page 
>has a pc program called Component (?).  Last I read he was affiliated 
>with the British Museum.  Hope this helps.

Rod's email address is rod.page@zoology.oxford.ac.uk however COMPONENT
is not so much for phylogeny reconstruction as it is for biogeographic
and host-parasite questions.

To continue: there's Kevin Nixon's ClaDos for examining character optimization.
Also, Felsenstein's Phylip.  And the latest is MEGA.

Most of these packages cost $ but not much.  MEGA is $15, PAUP is pretty
cheap given what it does.

(There's also my own software Random Cladistics, which does not calculate
phylogenies but does allow PC users who like the speed and reliability
of Hennig86 to do bootstrapping, Faith and Cranston's PTP, random-tree
histograms and a couple of other things.  Requires you have Hennig86
independently.  It's available (free) by anonymous ftp to zoo.toronto.edu
whereupon one must "cd pub" (no quotes) and get both random.exe and 
random.doc in binary mode.  Read random.doc for instructions on intalling
the package to your DOS pc.  Let me know if you get it as there's a couple
of helpful hints and limitations one should know about).

Sorry for banging my own drum, but it is free after all.

Mark

>


-- 
Mark E. Siddall            "In saying what is obvious, never choose cunning.
mes@vims.edu                    Yelling works better."     - C. Ozick
Virginia Inst. Marine Sci.
Gloucester Point, VA, 23062

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 11 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!daresbury!trane.uninett.no!sunic!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!psgrain!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!quartz.ucs.ualberta.ca!gpu!asimmond
From: asimmond@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (Andrew Simmonds)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: RAPD on Confier Needles
Date: 12 May 1994 21:58:54 GMT
Organization: University of Alberta
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <2qu8qu$n6u@quartz.ucs.ualberta.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gpu.srv.ualberta.ca
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Might anyone have any suggestions on how to prepare DNA from confier 
needles for RAPD analysis.  We are looking for something quick and dirty, 
other than the usual grinding in liquid nitrogen.  We need clean DNA, and 
CsCl gradients are not an option.  Thanks in advance..

Mark Hicks
Andrew Simmonds

______________________________________________________________________________
Department of Genetics - University of Alberta CANADA
ASIMMOND@GPU.SRV.UALBERTA.CA
G216 Biological Sciences Centre
Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA T6G 2E9
******************************************************************************
            "Does steel wool come from magnetic sheep?" 
******************************************************************************


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Thu May 12 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!pst.pp.ksu.edu!user
From: pst@ksu.ksu.edu (Paul St. Amand)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: RAPD on Confier Needles
Followup-To: bionet.molbio.rapd
Date: Fri, 13 May 1994 13:04:55 -0500
Organization: USDA/ARS & KSU Agronomy dept.
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <pst-130594130455@pst.pp.ksu.edu>
References: <2qu8qu$n6u@quartz.ucs.ualberta.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pst.pp.ksu.edu

In article <2qu8qu$n6u@quartz.ucs.ualberta.ca>,
asimmond@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (Andrew Simmonds) wrote:

> Might anyone have any suggestions on how to prepare DNA from confier 
> needles for RAPD analysis.  We are looking for something quick and dirty, 
> other than the usual grinding in liquid nitrogen.  We need clean DNA, and 
> CsCl gradients are not an option.  Thanks in advance..

Try NaOH extraction. I can't remember the citation, but I think it was in
NAR 1993. It's easy, cheap, and very fast. I get very good PCR results
using it on single alfalfa leaflets. You simply grind fresh tissue in 0.5
Normal NaOH (10ul per mg of fresh tissue) and pipette 5ul of the liquid
phase into 495ul of Tris (100mM, pH = 8.0). Shake well and use or freeze
immediately. Use 1 to 10ul of the Tris solution per RAPD reaction.

Let me know if it works.

Paul C. St. Amand               Research Geneticist
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
USDA/ARS Agronomy Dept.         
122 Throckmorton Hall           (913) 532-6168
Kansas State University         Fax (913) 532-5692
Manhattan KS 66506-5501         PST@KSU.KSU.Edu

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Thu May 12 23:00:00 1994
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!swrinde!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!munnari.oz.au!newsroom.utas.edu.au!ml.csiro.au!mac_1303.ml.csiro.au!chris.bolch
From: Christopher J. S. Bolch <chris.bolch@ml.csiro.au>
Subject: subscribe Bolch
Message-ID: <1994May12.225118.336@ml.csiro.au>
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A9F855D79A016251@mac_1303.ml.csiro.au>
X-Xxdate: Thu, 12 May 94 21: 53:27 GMT
Sender: news@ml.csiro.au
Organization: CSIRO Division of Fisheries, Hobart, Tasmania
X-Useragent: Version 1.1.3
Date: Thu, 12 May 1994 22:51:18 GMT
Lines: 1

subscribe chris.bolch@ml.csiro.au

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Thu May 12 23:00:00 1994
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!swrinde!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!munnari.oz.au!newsroom.utas.edu.au!ml.csiro.au!mac_1303.ml.csiro.au!chris.bolch
From: Christopher J. S. Bolch <chris.bolch@ml.csiro.au>
Subject: RAPD program
Message-ID: <1994May12.225448.466@ml.csiro.au>
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A9F856AA28026251@mac_1303.ml.csiro.au>
X-Xxdate: Thu, 12 May 94 21: 56:58 GMT
Sender: news@ml.csiro.au
Organization: CSIRO Division of Fisheries, Hobart, Tasmania
X-Useragent: Version 1.1.3
References: <199405041510.IAA26183@net.bio.net>
Date: Thu, 12 May 1994 22:54:48 GMT
Lines: 7

In article <199405041510.IAA26183@net.bio.net> , EQUIGENE@UKCC.UKY.EDU
writes:
>I would also like information on a computer program for systematics of
>RAPDs.  Thanks.

So would I.  I have seen analyses of data with other programs (e.g. PAUP)
but would like to know if there are other approaches available.

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Thu May 12 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!bks
From: bks@s27w007.pswfs.gov (Bradley K. Sherman)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: RAPD on Confier Needles
Date: 13 May 1994 20:45:15 GMT
Organization: Dendrome, A Genome Database for Forest Trees
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <2r0osr$h7m@overload.lbl.gov>
References: <2qu8qu$n6u@quartz.ucs.ualberta.ca> <pst-130594130455@pst.pp.ksu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: s27w007.pswfs.gov

asimmond@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (Andrew Simmonds) wrote:
> Might anyone have any suggestions on how to prepare DNA from confier 
> needles for RAPD analysis.  We are looking for something quick and dirty, 
> other than the usual grinding in liquid nitrogen.  We need clean DNA, and 
> CsCl gradients are not an option.  Thanks in advance..

We are attempting to compile protocols used in studying
the molecular biology of forest trees.  If you have not
already looked there, there is a section on the Dendrome
gopher (s27w007.pswfs.gov port 70): 
       
    ...
    6.  Forest tree genome resources (including TreeGenes)/ 
    ....
        4.  Protocols/
                 
where you might find something useful.  This section of 
our server is maintained by Kim Marshall (kam@s27w007.pswfs.gov). 
Suggestions, comments and contributed protocols are welcome. 
 
    --bks 

-- 
Bradley K. Sherman               P.O. Box 245                    
Computer Scientist               Berkeley, CA, 94701
Dendrome Project                 510-559-6437 FAX: 510-559-6440  
Institute of Forest Genetics     Internet: bks@s27w007.pswfs.gov

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sat May 14 23:00:00 1994
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!grapevine.lcs.mit.edu!olivea!koriel!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!EU.net!uunet!utcsri!utzoo!mes
From: mes@zoo.toronto.edu (Mark Siddall)
Subject: Re: RAPD program
Message-ID: <Cpuq6q.2H4@zoo.toronto.edu>
Date: Sun, 15 May 1994 16:08:49 GMT
References: <199405041510.IAA26183@net.bio.net> <1994May12.225448.466@ml.csiro.au>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
Lines: 35

In article <1994May12.225448.466@ml.csiro.au> Christopher J. S. Bolch <chris.bolch@ml.csiro.au> writes:
>In article <199405041510.IAA26183@net.bio.net> , EQUIGENE@UKCC.UKY.EDU
>writes:
>>I would also like information on a computer program for systematics of
>>RAPDs.  Thanks.
>
>So would I.  I have seen analyses of data with other programs (e.g. PAUP)
>but would like to know if there are other approaches available.

I (think) I have responded to this once already regarding the software 
available out there for phylogenetic work.  Upon re-reading the query it 
appears as though the poster might be under the impression that there is
RAPD-systematics oriented software.  There is not.  Nor is there any
need as such.  Phylogenetic software (e.g., PAUP, Hennig86, PHYLIP etc)
are character-based.  It doesn't matter what your characters are.  There
is some software designed for analyzing character information in long
DNA sequences (e.g., MEGA) so that the experimentor doesn't have to
go cross-eyed looking at the sequences.  This is not a problem for 
people doing RAPDs or RFLPs or what have you.  
This brings me to my next point.  Though RAPDs may be suitable for
population-level phenomena, they are not (in my opinion) at all suitable
for phylogenetic studies!  For the same reasons that RFLPs are not either.
Oh, sure, people are doign it, but when you start asking questions of
what is heritable, what is homology, and what constitutes a character
state transformation, it falls apart.
I'm probably going to be unpopular around here for having said this.

Mark


-- 
Mark E. Siddall            "In saying what is obvious, never choose cunning.
mes@vims.edu                    Yelling works better."     - C. Ozick
Virginia Inst. Marine Sci.
Gloucester Point, VA, 23062

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 15 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!edwards
From: edwards@nature.Berkeley.EDU (Owain Edwards)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: band detection programs
Date: 16 May 1994 14:16:59 GMT
Organization: U.C. College of Natural Resources
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <2r7v8r$48i@agate.berkeley.edu>
References: <kkammiov.32.2DD72404@viikki21.helsinki.fi>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nature.berkeley.edu

KARI KAMMIOVIRTA writes:
>Hi all sisters and brothers in PCR,
>
>I've been working with RAPD for two years now and noticed that worst part of 
>the work is comparing bands in pictures. Especially when I have lot of 
>samples (about 250) there is 13 different fotographs I have to compare.
>Has anybody used any programs for this. I have found only one that seems 
>suitable, Pharmacia's RFLPrint, does somebody have any comments about this 
>program? Price is nice (14000 $) and it would be good to have some 
>experienced opinions.
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Kari

	I am also interested in comparing among patterns.  I have been
searching for a while for a program that will do this, and I think I may
have found one, though I have not tried it yet.  I am sending for a demo
for a program called WHOLE BAND MATCHER which is part of the BioImage
Gel Scanner package from Millipore.  The documentation that I have
claims that it lets you compare bands within and between gels and the
program creates dendrograms and similarity indeces directly from gels.

	Has anyone had any experience with this program, or has anyone
heard anything about it?

Thanks,

Owain Edwards (edwards@nature.berkeley.edu)

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 15 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!parc!decwrl!decwrl!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!warwick!pipex!sunic!news.funet.fi!news.csc.fi!news.helsinki.fi!MMKAB-01208.pc.Helsinki.FI!kkammiov
From: kkammiov@viikki21.helsinki.fi (KARI KAMMIOVIRTA (MMKAB))
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: band detection programs
Date: Mon, 16 May 1994 07:43:01 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <kkammiov.32.2DD72404@viikki21.helsinki.fi>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mmkab-01208.pc.helsinki.fi

Hi all sisters and brothers in PCR,

I've been working with RAPD for two years now and noticed that worst part of 
the work is comparing bands in pictures. Especially when I have lot of 
samples (about 250) there is 13 different fotographs I have to compare.
Has anybody used any programs for this. I have found only one that seems 
suitable, Pharmacia's RFLPrint, does somebody have any comments about this 
program? Price is nice (14000 $) and it would be good to have some 
experienced opinions.
Thanks in advance,

Kari

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 15 23:00:00 1994
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.uoregon.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!ns1.nodak.edu!badlands!dahleen
From: dahleen@badlands.NoDak.edu (Lynn S Dahleen)
Subject: Re: RAPD CLONING
Sender: usenet@ns1.nodak.edu
Message-ID: <Cpwsu7.2GCs@ns1.nodak.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 May 1994 19:01:19 GMT
Distribution: bionet
References: <E835092F6C@uamercury.uark.edu>
Nntp-Posting-Host: badlands.nodak.edu
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Lines: 39

Doug Rhoads (DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU) wrote:
: >On 9 May 1994, Doug Rhoads wrote:
: >
: >> >
: >> >Hi,
: >> >At the moment I am intending to clone a rapd fragment of 1.6Kb, we have
: >> >some difficult. What is the most pratical tip to cloning this band. What
: >> >is the strategy used by the people that cloned RAP fragments.
: >> >Thanks.
: >> >######################################################
: >> >Alexandro C.T. Carvalho
: >> 
: >> The method we prefer to use is resolution on an agarose gel,  excise the 
: >> band, rinse for 5-10 minutes in dH2O, soak for several hours in 100ul of 
: >> H2O or low EDTA buffer, reamplify using the same primer on 2ul of eluate, 
: >> and then ligate into a PCR cloning vector such as pGEMT from Promega.
: >> 
: >> Doug Rhoads                  || Dept. of Biological Sciences
: >> 
 I too have had great success with this method using eluates from both 
agarose and acrylamide gels.  However, after re-amplification of the 
eluate, I typically add 5units of klenow to the reaction and incubate 30 
min at 37 degrees C to blunt end the DNA.  I then add 50-200ng of SmaI 
or EcoRV cut plasmid (bluescript in my case) to the mix. I then Phenol 
extract once, Chloroform extract once and then ethanol precipitate in 
order to get rid of excess ATPs that might (?) inhibit blunt ended 
ligations.  After air drying the resulting DNA pellet, I resuspend in 
17ul water and then add 2ul of 10X ligation buffer (NEB) and 1ul of NEBs 
concentrated T4 DNA ligase.  I allow the ligation reaction to go 
overnight at room temperature (about 22 degrees C).  I typically use half 
of the reaction to transform 100ul of competent DH5a cells using Richard 
Swartzes increadible competency proceedure. (Does anyone have a reference 
for this? I could use one as I have only an old beatup protocol from god 
knows where, and I would like to reference it in a paper I am preparing.) 
I hope this is of some additional help.

                                                Dave Horvath
                                                USDA/ARS/NCSL
                                                (701)239-1335

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 16 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!lsa3mac34.berkeley.edu!user
From: dobson@mendel.berkeley.edu (Steve Dobson)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Server for bionet.molbio.rapd
Followup-To: bionet.molbio.rapd
Date: 17 May 1994 17:23:47 GMT
Organization: U C Berkeley
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <dobson-170594092527@lsa3mac34.berkeley.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lsa3mac34.berkeley.edu

I have a friend who wants to link up to bionet.molbio.rapd.  I am linked up
via NewsWatcher for the MacIntosh.  He is unable to use this program.  Can
someone please e-mail him info on how to link up to bionet.molbio.rapd via
his e-mail account.  I assume this can be done, though I don't know how.

His address is :

DGMILL00@UKCC.uky.edu (the "0's" are zeros).

Thanks,

Steve

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 16 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!MERCURY.UARK.EDU!DRHOADS
From: DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Doug Rhoads")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: RAPD CLONING
Date: 17 May 1994 06:09:55 -0700
Organization: University of Arkansas
Lines: 53
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <34124E674D@uamercury.uark.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

>Doug Rhoads (DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU) wrote:
>: >On 9 May 1994, Doug Rhoads wrote:
>: >
>: >> >
>: >> >Hi,
>: >> >At the moment I am intending to clone a rapd fragment of 1.6Kb, we have
>: >> >some difficult. What is the most pratical tip to cloning this band. What
>: >> >is the strategy used by the people that cloned RAP fragments.
>: >> >Thanks.
>: >> >######################################################
>: >> >Alexandro C.T. Carvalho
>: >>
>: >> The method we prefer to use is resolution on an agarose gel,  excise the
>: >> band, rinse for 5-10 minutes in dH2O, soak for several hours in 100ul of
>: >> H2O or low EDTA buffer, reamplify using the same primer on 2ul of eluate,
>: >> and then ligate into a PCR cloning vector such as pGEMT from Promega.
>: >>
>: >> Doug Rhoads                  || Dept. of Biological Sciences
>: >>
> I too have had great success with this method using eluates from both
>agarose and acrylamide gels.  However, after re-amplification of the
>eluate, I typically add 5units of klenow to the reaction and incubate 30
>min at 37 degrees C to blunt end the DNA.  I then add 50-200ng of SmaI
>or EcoRV cut plasmid (bluescript in my case) to the mix. I then Phenol
>extract once, Chloroform extract once and then ethanol precipitate in
>order to get rid of excess ATPs that might (?) inhibit blunt ended
>ligations.  After air drying the resulting DNA pellet, I resuspend in
>17ul water and then add 2ul of 10X ligation buffer (NEB) and 1ul of NEBs
>concentrated T4 DNA ligase.  I allow the ligation reaction to go
>overnight at room temperature (about 22 degrees C).  I typically use half
>of the reaction to transform 100ul of competent DH5a cells using Richard
>Swartzes increadible competency proceedure. (Does anyone have a reference
>for this? I could use one as I have only an old beatup protocol from god
>knows where, and I would like to reference it in a paper I am preparing.)
>I hope this is of some additional help.
>
>                                                Dave Horvath
>                                                USDA/ARS/NCSL
>                                                (701)239-1335

Michael Weiner of Stratagene has pointed out that Klenow is not the best 
enzyme to `polish' ends of PCR products.  This is mostly true for products 
whose 3' nucleotide is NOT-A.  From the info he sent me it looks like if 
the products already terminates in A no further transferase activity is 
exhibited by the Taq Pol.  If you try and `blunt' products with Klenow 
the those with A,C or G at the 3' end (5' of primer NOT T) the Klenow 
treatment doesn't do as well for cloning as does T4 Pol or Pfu Pol.  This 
really means that a lot of us have been very lucky in the past.

Doug Rhoads                  || Dept. of Biological Sciences
drhoads@mercury.uark.edu     || 601 Science Engineering
drhoads@uafsysb.uark.edu     || University of Arkansas
501-575-3251                 || Fayetteville, AR 72701

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 16 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!PHIBRED.COM!murrayian
From: murrayian@PHIBRED.COM (IAN MURRAY)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Summary of Long PCR responses *thanks for the contributions"
Date: 17 May 1994 09:58:00 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 190
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <9405171703.AA19167@gw1.phibred.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hello Netters, 

Sorry for the out of order sequence of some of the posts.  The postings have 
led to my greater interest in long PCR.  I was wondering if fragment extension
was limited by:
1) those factors discussed in Science, March 1994.  (263:15654-1565)
2) the length of primer.  I propose that long primers can cause looping of the
  DNA, or at least increase the amount of unwound DNA.  On the down side,
  longer primers require longer annealing times.
3) lack of helicases and gyrases to release the torsional strain on the DNA
   strands _ I assume that the Polymerase extension causes strand separation.

Any comments???

Furthermore, Could anyone provide me with protocol for long PCR.


Thanks in advance.

Murrayian@phibred.com

Ian Murray
Pioneer Hi-Bred
--------------++++++++++++++++++++++++_______________________



Hi:
	I am surprised that you have a synthetic DNA of this length.
You could definitely help everyone if you can say how you managed
to get it.  I think you may probably have a ds kb length DNA.  In this
case the whole story changes because of its tendency to come together.  

	One main thing you need to be concerned about in using long
primers is their relative ease at which they degrade at high temperature.s
This is a combination of both temperature and the acidity of the reaction
mix resulting from temperature association of Tris' pH. 

	The change in viscosity is one of the last things to be worried 
about.   I would be very much surprised if you can get the PCR going using
such large primers in the first place.  Do let me know if you are successful.
  
Raj Shankarappa D.V.M., Ph.D
bsh@med.pitt.edu
745 Scaife Hall
Department of Pathology
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Pittsburgh PA 15261
Tel: (412) 648-9763 or 648-9573 or 648-9026 (Hey, I can't help it!)
Fax: (412) 648-1916
-----------------------------------------------------

Subj:	Use of PCR for chromosome walking?

Hello Netters,

I have a large primer, about 1-2kb and wish t use it in PCR reactions
to amplify large regions of DNA (about 10kb or more).  In this way we 
could chromosome walk.  Here is the crunch>

1)  How can I increase the stringency of binding of such a large piece of 
  DNA???
2) Are there any thermocyclers, programmes, or 
reagent concentrations (or
polymerase enzyme) that would enable this to be done?

3) With such large pieces of synthetic DNA, is the decrease in efficiency
greater than in normal PCR?

4) Does the final product become too viscous, and decrease mixing ?


If anyone has suggestions, references or helping hints, I would be greatly
appreciative.  It would save my coleagues and I a lot of time.

Yours Sincerely,

Ian Murray

Murrayian@phibred.com
----------------------------------------------
Subj:	Amplifying large DNAs

Interesting questions...why does the primer need to be so long? Otherwise,
yes, there are polymerase/thermal profile considerations that could be
of use to you. We have obtained larger than 10 kb amplifications, but the
primers were of "normal" length. I cannot see why your primers would need
to be so large. I can give some suggestions on the rest, though. Give
me a message if you are interested.


Sincerely,

Bruno WS Sobral
Staff Scientist
California Institute of Biological Research (CIBR)
11099 N. Torrey Pines Road, Suite 300
La Jolla CA USA 92037
(619)535-5483 (office)
(619)535-5491 (lab)
E-mail: sobral@lifsci.sdsu.edu or brunosfly@aol.com
(619)535-5472, 535-5490 or 535-5481 (faxes)
--------------------------------------
>
I am not sure why anyone would want to try and use 1kb primers??  My guess 
is that you actually have 1kbp dsDNA fragments and you want to amplify the 
region between them??  Just about the maximum size primer you should 
want is around 25-30 bases depending on the CG content.  At 50%CG most 
30mers have a Tm of >70C.  90C melts anything but you have to go down to 
70-72 for the Taq enzyme to function maximally.

Doug Rhoads                  || Dept. of Biological Sciences
drhoads@mercury.uark.edu     || 601 Science Engineering
drhoads@uafsysb.uark.edu     || University of Arkansas
501-575-3251                 || Fayetteville, AR 72701
--------------------------------------

Ian,
I read your question on the RAPDs network and agree with Doug Rhoades about the
primer size.  A very expensive primer I bet!!  I do know that Boehringer-
Mannheim has been able to amplify very large DNA fragments using their Taq DNA
polymerase (up to 10kb) using special techniques.  You might want to contact
their technical sevices department for the methods.  I have always gotten good
advice ....  Hope this helps.  Teri
--------------------------------------------

If you know the sequence of your 1 kb "primer", then ... use a portion of 
it (up to about 30 bases).
At larger lengths, it is true that you will have a higher melting temperature,
but Taq polymerase will need you to "cool" to 72 C for extension anyway, so
anything above that is useless for increasing PCR specificity per se. 

As to production of larger amplification fragments, you need to use other
polymerases (than just Taq) for best results. 

Sincerely,

Bruno WS Sobral
E-mail: sobral@lifsci.sdsu.edu or brunosfly@aol.com
--------------------------------------------------------

Have you seen the article entitled 'Long PCR' Leaps Into Larger DNA
Sequences, that was published in Science 263:1564-1565 (March 18, 1994)?
   Graham

Graham E. Corley-Smith
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
Biological Sciences Department
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C.,
V5A 1S6
Canada
Phone: (604) 291-3021
Fax:   (604) 291-5583
----------------------------------

Ian,
..... I still doubt large primers will work the way you expect.
 The article in Science makes sense to read,
but I heard that no one else could reproduce the results (grapevine). I
have not tried such a large amplification here, but 15 kb or so is
pretty standard. 

For walking, you may wish to look at BioTechniques 16(5):792-798. Never
tried it, but it sounds as easy as it's going to get for what I believe
you want to do. 

I also saw a posting of yours about the PTC100 failures. The BSA is
critical. We keep 200 micrograms/ml in all our reactions in the round-
bottom 96-well plates. Or you can use the conical bottom tubes, which do
not require BSA.

Good luck!

Sincerely,

Bruno WS Sobral
E-mail: sobral@lifsci.sdsu.edu or brunosfly@aol.com

------------------------------------------------     
     
     Ian,
     
     I use it all the time and it does work.  Wayne barnes' article was 
     published in the March PNAS.
     
     michael_weiner@stratagene
     
     (please be advised that Stratagene sells one of the ingredients 
     necessary for the reaction)

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 17 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!daresbury!trane.uninett.no!eunet.no!nuug!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!news.cc.emory.edu!news.cc.emory.edu!not-for-mail
From: vvarma@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu (Vijay A. Varma)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Cloning with TA
Date: 18 May 1994 17:39:10 -0400
Organization: Emory University
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <2re1tu$5ms@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: emoryu1.cc.emory.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]


I saw the postings about cloning rapd fragments and wondering why TA
cloning kits are not used more often. The protocols are simpler. Is it the
expense?
 We tried it once (from Novagen, I think) and appeared to work fine.
I would like to hear others' experience with the TA kits before we embark
on more cloning.

Thanks

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 17 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!uknet!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: nfix@virgo.jcu.cz (Ivo Wiesner)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: ?RAPD sampling for outcross popul.??
Date: 18 May 1994 13:05:55 +0100
Lines: 25
Sender: daemon@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <2rd0b3$nsr@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
X-Char-Esc: 29
X-Charset: ASCII
Original-To: rapd@dl.ac.uk


Hello Netters outthere !!!

   could anybody share with me his/her
experience with:
what is the best and fastest strategy for estimation of
the representative sample size (number of individuals)
when I have to discriminate among outcrossing populations, 
I mean populations of outcrossing plants (mutually isolated)
using RAPD technology.???
  (My problem are populations of fescue and ryegrass).

ThnaX in advance for any info or reference !!!!!!!!!!!


Greetings

Ivo Wiesner
nfix@virgo.jcu.cz

Inst.Plant Mol.Biol.
Branisovska 31
Ceske Budejovice
CZ-370 05
Czech Republic

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 18 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!usenet.ufl.edu!gnv.ifas.ufl.edu!afc
From: afc@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu (Andrew Cockburn)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: band detection programs
Message-ID: <1994May19.092946.4438@tower>
Date: 19 May 94 09:29:46 -0500
References: <kkammiov.32.2DD72404@viikki21.helsinki.fi> <2r7v8r$48i@agate.berkeley.edu>
Organization: USDA/ARS
Lines: 49

In article <2r7v8r$48i@agate.berkeley.edu>, edwards@nature.Berkeley.EDU (Owain Edwards) writes:
> KARI KAMMIOVIRTA writes:
>>Hi all sisters and brothers in PCR,
>>
>>I've been working with RAPD for two years now and noticed that worst part of 
>>the work is comparing bands in pictures. Especially when I have lot of 
>>samples (about 250) there is 13 different fotographs I have to compare.
>>Has anybody used any programs for this. I have found only one that seems 
>>suitable, Pharmacia's RFLPrint, does somebody have any comments about this 
>>program? Price is nice (14000 $) and it would be good to have some 
>>experienced opinions.
>>Thanks in advance,
>>
>>Kari
> 
> 	I am also interested in comparing among patterns.  I have been
> searching for a while for a program that will do this, and I think I may
> have found one, though I have not tried it yet.  I am sending for a demo
> for a program called WHOLE BAND MATCHER which is part of the BioImage
> Gel Scanner package from Millipore.  The documentation that I have
> claims that it lets you compare bands within and between gels and the
> program creates dendrograms and similarity indeces directly from gels.
> 
> 	Has anyone had any experience with this program, or has anyone
> heard anything about it?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Owain Edwards (edwards@nature.berkeley.edu)

We have a Millipore BioImage system.  It does some nice stuff, such as
finding bands automatically (not very reliable, though), calculating fragment
sizes (much better than doing it yourself), matching patterns between gels,
and exporting results for printing or storage.

The BioImage system was originally designed for plant breeders, who have to
follow lots of anonymous markers in lots of crosses.  It does this very well.
However, it runs only on a Sun SparcStation.  If you don't happen to have one
sitting in your lab, it will probably cost you $30k to $40k to get the system
set up, counting software, computer, and scanner.  Of course, you really want
to add a $50k phosphorimager: think of all the money you will save on darkroom
supplies!

Our main problem has been user resistance.  Most of my people have enough
trouble using their PCs, and the Sun terrifies them.  Anyone who uses it
on a routine basis thinks that it is great.

Andrew Cockburn
USDA

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 18 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!BORCIM.WUSTL.EDU!woods
From: woods@BORCIM.WUSTL.EDU (Jon Woods)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Cloning with TA
Date: 18 May 1994 17:02:48 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 43
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199405190003.AA08001@wugate.wustl.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

>To: rapd@net.bio.net
>From: vvarma@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu (Vijay A. Varma)
>Subject: Cloning with TA
>Date: 18 May 1994 17:39:10 -0400
> 
>I saw the postings about cloning rapd fragments and wondering why TA
>cloning kits are not used more often. The protocols are simpler. Is it the
>expense?
> We tried it once (from Novagen, I think) and appeared to work fine.
>I would like to hear others' experience with the TA kits before we embark
>on more cloning.
> 
>Thanks


We've found TA cloning of PCR fragments to work reasonably well, without a
kit or buying vector already containing 3' T overhangs.

Insert: PCR fragment, most molecules having 3' single A overhangs.

Vector: Digest cloning vector of choice with enzyme leaving blunt ends. 
Incubate DNA with thermostable polymerase, e.g., Taq, at 72C in the
presence of dTTP as the sole nucleotide.  Thermostable polymerases prefer
to use A to extend a blunt end by 1 nucleotide, but will use other
nucleotides if these are provided without A.  Thus, this procedure creates
vector molecules with 3' single T overhangs, compatible with the PCR
fragment.

Then ligate.

                                Jon

Jon Woods
Department of Molecular Microbiology
Box 8230
Washington University School of Medicine
660 S. Euclid Av.
St. Louis, MO  63110-1093

phone (314) 362-2741
FAX (314) 362-1232
e-mail: woods@borcim.wustl.edu


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 18 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!BORCIM.WUSTL.EDU!woods
From: woods@BORCIM.WUSTL.EDU (Jon Woods)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: TA cloning
Date: 19 May 1994 11:43:57 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 60
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199405191844.AA04799@wugate.wustl.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

>> 
>> Vector: Digest cloning vector of choice with enzyme leaving blunt ends. 
>> Incubate DNA with thermostable polymerase, e.g., Taq, at 72C in the
>> presence of dTTP as the sole nucleotide.  Thermostable polymerases prefer
>> to use A to extend a blunt end by 1 nucleotide, but will use other
>> nucleotides if these are provided without A.  Thus, this procedure creates
>> vector molecules with 3' single T overhangs, compatible with the PCR
>> fragment.
>> 
>> Then ligate.
>> 
>>                                 Jon
>> 
> 
>Hi Jon,  this protocol seems good to me, I wonder if you treat the vector 
>with CIAP before cloning. What is the vector amount (1-2 micrograms?) and 
>the dTTP  concentration (.1 mM?)  that you use for the reaction ?
>Thank you very much for any answer.
>Francesco Argenton, Dipartimento di Biologia
>Universita' di Padova, Via Trieste 75
>35121 Padova Italy
> 
>


Francesco,

        For adding a 3' T to blunt-ended vectors for cloning PCR fragments
with overhanging A termini:

        1. We do not dephosphorylate the vector.  If adding the Ts works,
vector circularization without insert is very inefficient.  We have been
doing this procedure with polylinkers using lacZ color detection of
inserts, and if the Ts are NOT added and the vector circularizes,
transformants are blue, while insert-positive transformants are white.

        2. We use "lots" of vector DNA, at least a microgram or two.

        3. We use quite a high concentration of dTTP: 1 mM.

        4. We use a microliter, i.e. a few units, of thermostable
polymerase in a 100-microliter reaction, and incubate at 72C for 2 hrs,
under mineral oil.

        Note: it doesn't always work, but then, what does?

                                        Jon


Jon Woods
Department of Molecular Microbiology
Box 8230
Washington University School of Medicine
660 S. Euclid Av.
St. Louis, MO  63110-1093

phone (314) 362-2741
FAX (314) 362-1232
e-mail: woods@borcim.wustl.edu


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Fri May 20 23:00:00 1994
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!cs.utk.edu!martha.utcc.utk.edu!bme!gaoli
From: gaoli@bme.utmem.edu (gaoli)
Subject: cDNA probes for stromelysin and collagenase from bovine tissue
Message-ID: <1994May21.040735.3782@martha.utcc.utk.edu>
Keywords: cDNA probes for stromelysin and collagenase
Lines: 11
Sender: gaoli@bme (gaoli)
Reply-To: gaoli@bme.utmem.edu (gaoli)
Organization: University of Tennessee, Memphis
Date: Sat, 21 May 1994 04:07:35 GMT


I am looking for cDNA probes for stromelysin and collagenase from bovine
tissue. Any help would be deeply appreciated. Please E-mail me at below
address:

gaoli@bme.utmem.edu
gaoli@eeg1.lcmc.edu

Thanks in advance.

gaoli

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 22 23:00:00 1994
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!agate!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!uhunix!stiles
From: stiles@uhunix.tmc.edu (John Stiles)
Subject: Re: Tm and Operon Technologies
Message-ID: <Cpr88z.CMA@news.Hawaii.Edu>
Sender: news@news.Hawaii.Edu
Organization: University of Hawaii
References: <2qqprm$dc4@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Distribution: bionet
Date: Fri, 13 May 1994 18:48:34 GMT
Lines: 24

In article <2qqprm$dc4@mserv1.dl.ac.uk> Julian Paul Robinson <jpr@st-andrews.ac.uk> writes:
>Does any one out-there know how to calculate
>Tm for primers of 10 bp??
>
>Also, does anyone know the address/fax no.
>of Operon Technologies, Inc. 
>(or distributor for the UK)
>
>:-)
>
>Julian
>
Julian,
     Operon Technologies, Inc.
     1000 Atlantic Ave.
     Alameda CA 94501 USA

     Phone: (415) 865-8644
     Fax:   (415) 865-5255

Hope this helps.

John Stiles
stiles@uhunixa.uhcc.hawaii.edu

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 23 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!COASMAIL.PHYSICS.DREXEL.EDU!lab_gealt
From: lab_gealt@COASMAIL.PHYSICS.DREXEL.EDU ("Lab Gealt")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: sequencing PCR products
Date: 24 May 1994 15:10:35 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 13
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199405242206.PAA23055@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

REGARDING                sequencing PCR products
Has anyone tried sequencing their PCR product directly. I have been trying to
do it by dideoxy method using Sequenase 2.0 but have only got a smear.  My
product is double-stranded and I used boiling at 100 C for denaturing it.  I
take the PCR product, gel purify it, denature it as above and then follow the
manufacturer's (USB) instructions to do the sequencing.  The labelling reaction
was performed on ice instead of RT.  Anyone who has faced similar problem or
has any other protocol for direct sequencing (without cloning into a plasmid)
of PCR product please let me know. Thanx.
Vandana 
saboovm@duvm.ocs.drexel.edu 



From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 23 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!daresbury!trane.uninett.no!sunic!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!phylo!smith
From: smith@phylo.life.uiuc.edu (Steven Smith)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: RAPD program
Date: 24 May 94 19:25:56 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <smith.769807556@phylo>
References: <199405041510.IAA26183@net.bio.net> <1994May12.225448.466@ml.csiro.au> <Cpuq6q.2H4@zoo.toronto.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: phylo.life.uiuc.edu

mes@zoo.toronto.edu (Mark Siddall) writes:

>In article <1994May12.225448.466@ml.csiro.au> Christopher J. S. Bolch <chris.bolch@ml.csiro.au> writes:
>>In article <199405041510.IAA26183@net.bio.net> , EQUIGENE@UKCC.UKY.EDU
>>writes:
>>>I would also like information on a computer program for systematics of
>>>RAPDs.  Thanks.
>>
>>So would I.  I have seen analyses of data with other programs (e.g. PAUP)
>>but would like to know if there are other approaches available.

>I (think) I have responded to this once already regarding the software 
>available out there for phylogenetic work.  Upon re-reading the query it 
>appears as though the poster might be under the impression that there is
>RAPD-systematics oriented software.  There is not.  Nor is there any
>need as such.  Phylogenetic software (e.g., PAUP, Hennig86, PHYLIP etc)
....
>I'm probably going to be unpopular around here for having said this.

Mark,
  While it is remarkable easy to make such off the cuff statements, you
mislead people in the reliability of character based methods.  All
suffer considerably from false matches.  I suggest you read Hillis
et. al. in April 29, 1994 Science (vol 264). Pay particular attention
to Figure 7 demonstrating comparing sequence based phylogenetic reconstruction
to restriction site data.


Sincerely,
Steven Smith

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 25 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!nermal.cs.uoguelph.ca!herman.cs.uoguelph.ca!mlagace
From: mlagace@uoguelph.ca (Mark C Lagace)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: rapd problems
Date: 26 May 1994 21:10:55 GMT
Organization: University of Guelph
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <2s338v$fhg@nermal.cs.uoguelph.ca>
References: <2s2sme$slc@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: herman.cs.uoguelph.ca
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Shaukat Ali (shaukat@cc.umanitoba.ca) wrote:
: Sorry if this is a FAQ.  We are just starting to do some rapds in our
: lab to distinguish between different isolates of pyrenophora tritici repentis.
: In our first reaction we tested 6 primers under the following conditions:
: dNTPs: 		100mM
: primer: 	0.36 mM
: DNA: 		25 ng
: Mgcl2		1.5 mM
: Taq		1.5 U

: in a 25 ul final vol.  Pcr conditions

: 94	1'
: 36	1'
: 72	2'

: But we did not get any bands.  None at all.  So we played around a bit with
: different conc. of Mgcl2 and DNA.  We got just one reaction working for us
: with just one primer.  The other two primers we tested didn't work.  The
: conditions under which one primer worked were Mgcl2 2.5 mM and 50 ng total
: DNA.

: We are wondering what we should do now.  Any suggestions will be welcome.
: Thanks.

	I have been doing some RAPD work for a few weeks now with P. 
vulgaris (common white bean) DNA.  What I have found to work well is the 
following reaction mixture:
(N.B. ul = microlitre)
	per 24ng DNA (in 3ul H2O)
	3 ul	H2O
	10 ul	2 mM 4dNTP
	2.5 ul	10X PCR buffer (eg Promega or Gibco BRL)
	1.5 ul	100mM MgCl2
	3.0 ul	primer (conc: 10 ug in 1 ml H2O)
	2.0 ul	1U/ul Taq

	The PCR conditions are:	94 C	1 min
				94 C	15 sec  ---|
				36 C	45 sec	   |-- 35 cycles
				72 C	1 min	---|
				72 C	5 min
				then keep at 4 C overnight if necessary.

	I suggest you read "Optimization of the PCR program for RAPD 
analysis", by Kangfu Yu and K.P. Pauls, in Nucleic Acids Research Vol 20, 
No 10, 1992, pp 2606 for a more detailed explanation.  (Note, however, that 
the PCR program has changed slightly from that described in the 
article).
	Unfortunately, different DNA works best under different 
conditions, so trial and error is the only method to determine what will 
work for your samples.

		Sincerely,
				Mark.

 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
	Mark Lagace,	Molecular Biology and Genetics
			University of Guelph
			Guelph, Ontario, Canada
	email:	mlagace@uoguelph.ca

	NSERC Student working for Dr. Peter Pauls, University of Guelph
						   Dept. of Crop Science.
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 25 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!quartz.ucs.ualberta.ca!tribune.usask.ca!canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca!shaukat
From: shaukat@cc.umanitoba.ca (Shaukat Ali)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: rapd problems
Date: 26 May 1994 19:18:38 GMT
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <2s2sme$slc@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pollux.cc.umanitoba.ca

Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: problems with rapd. HELP!
Summary: 
Expires: 
Sender: 
Followup-To: 
Distribution: bionet.molbio.rapd
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Keywords: 

Sorry if this is a FAQ.  We are just starting to do some rapds in our
lab to distinguish between different isolates of pyrenophora tritici repentis.
In our first reaction we tested 6 primers under the following conditions:
dNTPs: 		100mM
primer: 	0.36 mM
DNA: 		25 ng
Mgcl2		1.5 mM
Taq		1.5 U

in a 25 ul final vol.  Pcr conditions

94	1'
36	1'
72	2'

But we did not get any bands.  None at all.  So we played around a bit with
different conc. of Mgcl2 and DNA.  We got just one reaction working for us
with just one primer.  The other two primers we tested didn't work.  The
conditions under which one primer worked were Mgcl2 2.5 mM and 50 ng total
DNA.

We are wondering what we should do now.  Any suggestions will be welcome.
Thanks.


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 25 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!CU-DIALUP-0232.CIT.CORNELL.EDU!bl14
From: bl14@cornell.edu (Barbara E. Liedl)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Post-doc position:  Plant Genetics
Date: Thu, 26 May 1994 13:08:07
Organization: Cornell University
Lines: 49
Sender: bl14@cornell.edu (Verified)
Message-ID: <bl14.70.000D230D@cornell.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cu-dialup-0232.cit.cornell.edu

POSTDOCTORAL POSITION: PLANT GENETICS  
 
A post-doctoral position is available immediately at CORNELL 
UNIVERSITY, Ithaca, NY.  This project is to illucidate the 
molecular genetic control of the biosynthetic pathway for 
acylsugars, a class of compounds mediating multiple pest 
resistance in the wild tomato L. pennellii.  The research is 
directed at determining the role of the genes in identified 
genomic regions on the biosynthesis of acylsugars and using this 
information in the transfer of acylsugar-mediated multiple pest 
resistance to cultivated tomato.  The research involves all or 
part of the following: 
 
*Use of an existing map and additional populations to determine 
the role of each of identified regions in acylsugar biosynthesis 
 
*Testing to determine whether any additional regions not yet 
identified affect types or levels of acylsugars produced 
 
*Use of lines segregating for only one of the acylsugar-related 
genomic regions to improve fine mapping of these regions as a 
precursor to mapped based cloning. 
 
The position is funded by a UDSA/NRI genome grant for up to two 
years, although application for renewal is expected.  
 
QUALIFICATIONS: Applicants MUST have a Ph.D. degree by the time of 
appointment, along with experience in molecular genetics and plant 
molecular biological techniques and/or biochemistry (DNA 
extraction, RFLP techniques, PCR methodology, etc.) and training 
and/or experience in either statistics or quantitative genetics.  
An interest in plant improvement is also highly desirable.  
Experience with QTL mapping is not required. 
 
APPLICATION: Send curriculum vitae, brief statement of research 
accomplishments and goals (less than one page), and list of three 
references (with phone and FAX numbers) to  
 
Dr. Martha A. Mutschler 
Cornell University 
Dept. of Plant Breeding and Biometry 
303 Bradfield Hall 
Ithaca, NY  14853 
 
tel:  607-255-1660 
fax:  607-255-6683 
Email:  mam13@cornell.edu

PLEASE don't contact me, I am only posting the position!!!

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 25 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: dudy bar-zvi <dbarzvi@bgumail.bgu.ac.il>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: RAPD of DNA from dry tissue
Date: 26 May 1994 15:38:20 +0100
Lines: 16
Sender: daemon@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <2s2c8s$8ee@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Original-To: rapd@dl.ac.uk

Hello netters,

I wonder if anyone has the knows if it is possible to get good quality
DNA finger print or RAPD from DNA isolated from dried mammalian tissue
(e.g. dried remaining of muscle or bone marrow tissues).


Thanks for your help,

D. Bar-Zvi
Life Sciences
Ben-Gurion University
Beer-Sheva, Israel

E-mail: dbarzvi@bgumail.bgu.ac.il


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Thu May 26 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!A1.TCH.HARVARD.EDU!FREEMAN_M
From: FREEMAN_M@A1.TCH.HARVARD.EDU ("Michael R. Freeman,Ph.D.")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Southerns of RNA RAPDs
Date: 27 May 1994 15:10:00 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 22
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199405272209.PAA11149@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net


Hello Netters, 

	We are entertaining the idea of attempting to confirm differential
gene expression data obtained by RNA RAPD (differential display) by
using Southern blots of the RAPD products hybridized to 32P-labeled
cDNA probes generated by reverse transcription.  I did something like
this a long time ago (before PCR) to obtain genomic clones corresponding
to genes expressed in rat brain but not in other tissues.  The trick in
this case was to use Cot 1 DNA as competitor to suppress hybridization
to repetitive DNA sequences.

	I'd like any comments/predictions/bets/advice about this 
approach, specifically whether it would be advisable to generate
the cDNA primer extension probe from total RNA or polyA+ RNA, and what
conditions for probe labeling or hybridization might be preferable.

	Thanks in advance.

Michael Freeman
Children's Hospital, Boston
freeman_m@a1.tch.harvard.edu

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Thu May 26 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: Wirote Tuntiwechapikul <mdbcs001@cmu.chiangmai.ac.th>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Subscription
Date: 27 May 1994 08:58:50 +0100
Lines: 7
Sender: daemon@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <2s497q$s46@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Original-To: rapd@dl.ac.uk

subscribe
Wirote Tuntiwechapikul
Department of Biochemistry
Faculty of Medicine
Chiangmai University
Chiangmai, Thailand.


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 30 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!CU-DIALUP-0312.CIT.CORNELL.EDU!bl14
From: bl14@cornell.edu (Barbara E. Liedl)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: What type of gel is best for RAPD?
Date: Tue, 31 May 1994 08:40:38
Organization: Cornell University
Lines: 13
Sender: bl14@cornell.edu (Verified)
Message-ID: <bl14.80.0008ADAB@cornell.edu>
References: <CqnntF.LoG@ucc.su.OZ.AU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cu-dialup-0312.cit.cornell.edu

>Subject: What type of gel is best for RAPD?

We use a 2% agarose gel to separate our RAPDs.  In addition, we use regular 
agarose in our lab.  Several labs have used other combinations, so I tried 
using NuSieve agarose and 1/2 NuSieve:1/2 regular agarose and found no 
differences.  So we use regular agarose (it is lots cheaper than NuSieve) 
and find it separates our samples (300-1500 bp) well.  If you look in 
Maniatis (or Sambrook), 2% gels work well for separating 0.1 - 3 kb.  Hope 
this helps.

Barbara Liedl
Cornell University
Dept. of Plant Breeding

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 30 23:00:00 1994
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!agate!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!munnari.oz.au!metro!angis.su.oz.au!kanemats
From: kanemats@angis.su.oz.au ()
Subject: What type of gel is best for RAPD?
Message-ID: <CqnntF.LoG@ucc.su.OZ.AU>
Sender: news@ucc.su.OZ.AU
Nntp-Posting-Host: morgan.angis.su.oz.au
Reply-To: kanemats@angis.su.oz.au ()
Organization: ANGIS, The University of Sydney, Australia
Date: Tue, 31 May 1994 07:08:02 GMT
Lines: 8

ÿWPCÛ


Ákk*
                            
                                      Many thanks
                                      Francisca Supple
                                      kanemats@morgan.angis.su.oz.au

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 30 23:00:00 1994
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!crcnis1.unl.edu!newsfeed.ksu.ksu.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!vms.ucc.okstate.edu!shufran
From: shufran@vms.ucc.okstate.edu
Subject: temp. slopes
Message-ID: <1994May31.100413.1@vms.ucc.okstate.edu>
Lines: 26
Sender: news@osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu (USENET News System)
Nntp-Posting-Host: vms.ucc.okstate.edu
Organization: Oklahoma State University Computer Center
Date: Tue, 31 May 1994 15:04:13 GMT

I've been lurking for a few days now and here is my first attempt to post a
message.

I have a question conerning annealing and extension times in RAPD-PCR.  I've
just started doing some amplifications with aphid DNA and have tried 2
programs.  They are bascially the same, except for the time of heating from
annealing temp (37) to extension temp (72).  The first program has the temp
increase as fast as possible.  The second uses a slope with a 1 dergree
increase per 8 sec (I got this from Black et al 1992).

My results were quite different.  There was one band well amplified that was
common to both, but the long ramp time had more bands of a larger size.  The
short ramp time had smaller size products.  Bothe progams yielded products
which were consistently amplified with the same template, but the products
differed greatly between the two programs.

Q.1. If I am to continue optimizing, which program should I follow?

Q.2.  Is there an advantage or reason why the long slope time would be better? 

Any advice would be appreciated.

Kevin A Shufran
USDA-ARS
Stillwater, OK


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 31 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunic!EU.net!uunet!senior.nectec.or.th!mars.mahidol.ac.th!mucc!scbst
From: scbst@mucc.mahidol.ac.th (Burachai Sonthayanon - SCBC)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Reducing reaction volume to 10 ul cause problem. Suggestion ?
Date: 1 Jun 1994 11:36:00 GMT
Organization: Mahidol University, Thailand.
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <2shrr0$jbr@mars.mahidol.ac.th>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mucc.mahidol.ac.th
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Dear colleagues,
	I need some advise from you. Since we started to survey a no. of DNA 
samples by reducing rapd reaction volume to 10 ul per tube lately, we 
started to get problem : in many of the reactions, rapd failed to 
produced bands. We have never had problem when using 25 ul reaction 
during the past 6 months.

	My condition was 10 mM Tris-HCl 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 
0.001% gelatin, 200 uM dNTPs, 0.2 uM primer, 10 ng rice genomic DNA, 0.2 
U AmpliTaq, running 35 cycles of 94 C (15 sec), 36 C (45 sec), 72 C (90 
sec). We did not use hot start.
	 
	I would appreciate all comments. Thanks.

				Burachai Sonthayanon


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 31 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!DEAKIN.EDU.AU!huangbx
From: huangbx@DEAKIN.EDU.AU
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: How do you manage your working sample DNA in RAPD?
Date: 31 May 1994 20:29:28 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 14
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199406010329.NAA07640@sol.ccs.deakin.edu.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hello netters,

I am having difficulty in the Abalone DNA. Once the DNA put into -20 or -70
or 4C frige, there was NO RAPD bands immediately. I presume that the DNA
was broken down during the frozen processing. Normally how do you arrange
the DNA if you will use the same DNA in several RAPD reactions?

Heart-felt thanks.

With regards.

Bixing Huang
huangbx@deakin.edu.au


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 31 23:00:00 1994
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!agate!msuinfo!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!angis.su.oz.au!kanemats
From: kanemats@angis.su.oz.au ()
Subject: What type of gel is best for RAPD: 2?
Message-ID: <CqpBs8.Bn6@ucc.su.OZ.AU>
Sender: news@ucc.su.OZ.AU
Nntp-Posting-Host: morgan.angis.su.oz.au
Reply-To: kanemats@angis.su.oz.au ()
Organization: ANGIS, The University of Sydney, Australia
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 1994 04:43:19 GMT
Lines: 10

HELP! (that's just a small "help").
I'm just beginning to use RAPD PCR. My PCR is going O.K. but I'm not 
getting good resolution on my 6% polyacrylamide gels/TBEgels 
(non-denaturing). The band sizes I'm interested in are 1kb or
smaller (100bp). So what I want to know is what sort of gel is going to 
be good for this?
                            
                                      Many thanks
                                      Francisca Supple
                                      kanemats@morgan.angis.su.oz.au

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 31 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!CORNELL.EDU!MAL5
From: MAL5@CORNELL.EDU (Muhammad A. Lodhi)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Conversion of RAPD primers to co-dominant markers?
Date: 1 Jun 1994 11:36:17 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 20
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199406011836.OAA06769@postoffice.mail.cornell.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

In response to Ian,
There are several articles on cleaved amplified polymorphic sequences
(CAPS), amplification fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), sequence
characterized amplified regions (SCARs) and may be some others that could
be used in converting RAPD markers to co-dominant markers.  If you need
references about any of these, please let me know.
Muhammad A. Lodhi
Cornell University
============================================================================= 
>Hello again,
>
>Does anyone know how to or has information concerning converting
>RAPD markers to co-dominant markers?
>
>Thanks for you help in advance.
>
>Murrayian@phibred.com
>
>Ian Murray


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 31 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!CORNELL.EDU!MAL5
From: MAL5@CORNELL.EDU (Muhammad A. Lodhi)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: How do you manage your working sample DNA in RAPD?
Date: 1 Jun 1994 11:28:41 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 27
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199406011828.OAA04773@postoffice.mail.cornell.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

In response to Bixing Huang,

I have kept grape DNA for more than 2 years at -20C without any problem.  I
saw problem in RAPD amplification when the color of the extracted DNA was
not clear before storage.   What I normally do is, just after extraction I
aliquat DNA into several small tubes (25-100 ng/uL dH2O) and keep it at
-20C and the rest of the concentrated stock is also kept at the same temp. 
I keep on using the aliquat tubes without thawing the conc. stock.  This
way if one tube goes bad I have others to work with and also the stock
tube.  This procedure did very well for grapes hope it works with other
species.
Muhammad A. Lodhi   

>Hello netters,
>
>I am having difficulty in the Abalone DNA. Once the DNA put into -20 or -70
>or 4C frige, there was NO RAPD bands immediately. I presume that the DNA
>was broken down during the frozen processing. Normally how do you arrange
>the DNA if you will use the same DNA in several RAPD reactions?
>
>Heart-felt thanks.
>
>With regards.
>
>Bixing Huang
>huangbx@deakin.edu.au


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 31 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!agate!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!pipex!uknet!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: Louis van de Zande <ZANDELPW@biol.rug.nl>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Reducing reaction volume to 10 ul cause problem. Sugges
Date: 1 Jun 1994 15:21:58 +0100
Organization: Department of Biology, RUGroningen
Lines: 18
Sender: daemon@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <2si5i6$i18@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: ZANDELPW@BIOL.RUG.nl
Return-receipt-to: ZANDELPW@BIOL.RUG.NL
Original-To: rapd@dl.ac.uk

> Dear colleagues,
>     I need some advise from you. Since we started to survey a no. of DNA 
> samples by reducing rapd reaction volume to 10 ul per tube lately, we 
> started to get problem : in many of the reactions, rapd failed to 
> produced bands. We have never had problem when using 25 ul reaction 
> during the past 6 months.
> 
>     My condition was 10 mM Tris-HCl 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 
> 0.001% gelatin, 200 uM dNTPs, 0.2 uM primer, 10 ng rice genomic DNA, 0.2 
> U AmpliTaq, running 35 cycles of 94 C (15 sec), 36 C (45 sec), 72 C (90 
> sec). We did not use hot start.
>      
>     I would appreciate all comments. Thanks.
> 
>                 Burachai Sonthayanon
> 

Well, switch back to 25 ul and life is beautiful again.

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 31 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!UNIXG.UBC.CA!hobbs
From: hobbs@UNIXG.UBC.CA
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: UBC DDRT-PCR Kit
Date: 1 Jun 1994 16:36:07 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 57
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <9406012332.AA25824@unixg.ubc.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

We were recently asked to make up the primers required to perform DDRT-PCR
(or "mRNA RAPD") by colleagues here at UBC.  The cost for the 38 primers
they required was fairly substantial based on (even our modest) custom
primer rates, and in view of the wide interest in the technique, it seemed
a reasonable idea to construct an affordable "Kit", in the same way that we
have been putting together Primer kits for RAPD work, and to offer them to
the community in the same way.  So, I have a modest number of kits for
DDRT-PCR work available, if anyone is interested.  If demand is
significant, no doubt we could make more. Details are as follows:

The UBC primer set for Differential Display Reverse Transcription PCR
contains 30 nmoles each of 12 primers of general sequence d[(T11)VN] and 3
nmoles each of 26 primers numbered mRNA 1 through mRNA 26.  These  latter
sequences are the 26 "optimised" sequences described by Bauer et al. in
Nucleic Acids Research, 1993, 21, 4270-4280.  These quantities should
suffice to perform DDRT-PCR in 20 tissue samples, according to the
published protocols (e.g. Bauer et al., and Chang and Pardee).  The primers
were purified by elution with Tris/EDTA buffer through NAP-5 drip columns. 
The yields were determined spectrophotometrically.  Aliquots corresponding
to the quantities indicated above were made near the bottom of sterile
Eppendorf tubes and air dried.  In the case of the mRNA 1-26 primers, the
volume aliquotted was 10 microlitres;  for the d[(T11)VN] primers the
volume of the aliquot varied but was always less than 60 microlitres.  All
manipulations were conducted in a sterile laminar flow hood.  These primers
are functioning well in laboratories at U.B.C.

The price of the UBC DDRT-PCR Primer Set is Can.$400.00 or US$ 315.00, plus
carriage:  by airmail, US$4 to most parts of the world, or, for courier
delivery $7Can. for shipments within Canada, US$ 11 for shipments to the
US,  US$16 to the UK, US$16 to Western Europe, US$17 to Australasia, US$17
to the Far East, US$25 to China, South America, and Africa.   I can accept
purchase orders by fax, mail or e-mail.  Orders must specify your mailing
address, the name of the person to be billed (i.e. grant holder), your
preference as to shipment via courier or air mail, and either an official
Purchase Order Number or your cheque in advance (made out to "University of
British Columbia") and sent to me at the address below.  If an order is
phoned in, a copy of the P.O. for our records is still required.

Our RAPD primer sets #1 through #8 are still available:  stocks are low on
some of them , but we are restocking imminently, and intend to maintain
their availability.  Anyone requiring details of these is requested to
contact me by e-mail, phone or fax.  For those who are wondering, we are
presently at work on Primer Set #9:  it is designed to target
microsatellite sequences.  I will give more details when the set is
available.

John Hobbs
Dr. John Hobbs
Nucleic Acid - Protein Service (NAPS) Unit
Biotechnology Laboratory
Room 237, Wesbrook Building
6174 University Boulevard
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, V6T 1Z3
Canada.
FAX (604)822-5437 or (604)822-0676; Tel. (604)822-6373


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 31 23:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!PHIBRED.COM!murrayian
From: murrayian@PHIBRED.COM (IAN MURRAY)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Conversion of RAPD primers to co-dominant markers?
Date: 1 Jun 1994 06:53:34 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 11
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <9406011358.AA25934@gw1.phibred.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hello again,

Does anyone know how to or has information concerning converting
RAPD markers to co-dominant markers?

Thanks for you help in advance.

Murrayian@phibred.com

Ian Murray


