From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 01 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsrelay.iastate.edu!bvc.edu!yuqian
From: yuqian@bvc.edu (Suicidal Freshman)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: New Dedicated Bio-tech/science/chem BBS
Message-ID: <1995May2.123420.10885@bvc.edu>
Date: 2 May 95 12:34:20 CDT
Organization: Buena Vista College, Storm Lake, IA
Lines: 27
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.proteins:4430 bionet.molbio.rapd:1118

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
        A NEW BBS IS ONLINE AND NEEDS PEOPLE LIKE YOU TO HELP IT PROSPER

The IDT Online Information System is now up and running and needs intelligent 
users such as yourselves. Anyone interested in Chemistry or Biology or any 
twist of the two is more than welcome. If you are a user of Oligonucleotides, 
there is an online order system that allows you to place your order directly 
into the production facility for 48 hour turnaround.

	       THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO CHARGE FOR USAGE.
	 YOU DO NOT HAVE TO BE A CUSTOMER TO USE THE SYSTEM

Just a sample of some of the discussion forums:

Parsitology            Classifieds         Employment      Chemical Engineering
Computer Software   Biochemistry     Programming  Molecular Medicine
Genetics       Organic Chemistry   Oligo Design     Scientific Humor
BioPhysics           Cell Biology        Internet Topics  Biomed Engineering
Late Breaking News     Immunology     NeuroScience    Suggestions

The system is in place, and we are looking for good users, and a few Forum
Moderators, so:

Check it out:
		   telnet 204.71.106.202   or  telnet idtdna.com

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 01 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsrelay.iastate.edu!bvc.edu!yuqian
From: yuqian@bvc.edu (Suicidal Freshman)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.proteins,bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: New Dedicated Bio-tech/science/chem BBS
Message-ID: <1995May2.123306.10882@bvc.edu>
Date: 2 May 95 12:33:06 CDT
Organization: Buena Vista College, Storm Lake, IA
Lines: 27
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.proteins:4429 bionet.molbio.rapd:1117

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
        A NEW BBS IS ONLINE AND NEEDS PEOPLE LIKE YOU TO HELP IT PROSPER

The IDT Online Information System is now up and running and needs intelligent 
users such as yourselves. Anyone interested in Chemistry or Biology or any 
twist of the two is more than welcome. If you are a user of Oligonucleotides, 
there is an online order system that allows you to place your order directly 
into the production facility for 48 hour turnaround.

	       THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO CHARGE FOR USAGE.
	 YOU DO NOT HAVE TO BE A CUSTOMER TO USE THE SYSTEM

Just a sample of some of the discussion forums:

Parsitology            Classifieds         Employment      Chemical Engineering
Computer Software   Biochemistry     Programming  Molecular Medicine
Genetics       Organic Chemistry   Oligo Design     Scientific Humor
BioPhysics           Cell Biology        Internet Topics  Biomed Engineering
Late Breaking News     Immunology     NeuroScience    Suggestions

The system is in place, and we are looking for good users, and a few Forum
Moderators, so:

Check it out:
		   telnet 204.71.106.202   or  telnet idtdna.com

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 02 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!ASRR.ARSUSDA.GOV!abartlet
From: abartlet@ASRR.ARSUSDA.GOV ("Alan C. Bartlett")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Stoffel Framgent and RAPD
Date: 3 May 1995 10:43:15 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 10
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950503133936.23510D-100000@asrr.arsusda.gov>
References: <Chris_Jones.115.000888A5@VME.CCC.NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

We have used Stoeffel fragment exclusively for our insect RAPD work and 
are happy with the results.  I think it is somewhat cheaper than TAQ, so 
if it works for you, then it is probably worth it.

Alan C. Bartlett
"GENES-R-US"
"ALTERATIONS AVAILABLE!^"
"^some restrictions may apply:)"



From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 02 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!RS6000.CMP.ILSTU.EDU!jadole
From: jadole@RS6000.CMP.ILSTU.EDU (Jeff Dole)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Bulk Segregant Analysis
Date: 3 May 1995 09:54:21 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 31
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <9505031653.AA76417@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net


Adam Marchant asks:
>Could someone please give me a reference for a clear exposition of the
>principles of bulk segregant analysis using RAPDs - the theory, as well as
>the practical details?

Here's the original reference:

Michelmore, R. W., I. Paran and R. V. Kesseli, 1991  Identification of
markers linked to disease 
resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect
markers in specific genomic 
regions by using segregating populations.  Proceedings of the National
Academy of Science 88: 9828 - 
9832.

There are many more recent references, but this should help.

Jeff Dole
Biology Department
Illinois State University
Normal, IL 61701
(309) 438-7351
jadole@ilstu.edu
                   
>
>
>
>
>


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 02 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!cabi.org!D.BRAYFORD
From: D.BRAYFORD@cabi.org ("David Brayford ", IMI)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: SSRSSRSSRSSR
Date: 3 May 1995 04:08:33 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 13
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <2FA7642A@msm.cgnet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net


Hi All
I've been trying SSR-primer PCR with some fungi and have got nice 
fingerprint-like banding patterns with e.g. (CAG)x5 and (TCC)x5, but with 
(CAT)x5 all I get is a smear at the top of the gel.  My interpretation of 
this is that:  (a). amplification is happening, so presumably target 
sequences are present;  but  (b).  these are not dispersed, just one long 
lump.
Has anybody else found similar things?  Do you agree with my interpretation? 
 Maybe there's something more complicated going on?
Cheers,
Dave Brayford
d.brayford@cabi.org

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 02 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!gatech!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!not-for-mail
From: marchaa@agric.nsw.gov.au (A.Marchant)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Bulk Segregant Analysis
Date: 2 May 1995 23:38:47 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
Lines: 18
Sender: nobody@cs.utexas.edu
Message-ID: <Pine.3.07.9505031446.A7654-9100000@wagsun>
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.cs.utexas.edu

Could someone please give me a reference for a clear exposition of the
principles of bulk segregant analysis using RAPDs - the theory, as well as
the practical details?

One thing that I am interested in is the possibility of finding
markers, using bulk segregant analysis, when near-inbred lines are not
available.

Thanks very much,

	Adam Marchant
	Agricultural Research Institute
	Wagga Wagga, NSW
	Australia

	marchaa@agric.nsw.gov.au



From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 02 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!warwick!griffin.nott.ac.uk!pmbcjz.nottingham.ac.uk!Chris_Jones
From: Chris_Jones@VME.CCC.NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK (Chris Jones)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Stoffel Framgent and RAPD
Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 08:31:58
Organization: Univ. of Nottingham Biochemistry Dept
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <Chris_Jones.115.000888A5@VME.CCC.NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pmbcjz.nottingham.ac.uk
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]

Hello
         ,I went to an ABI seminar yesterday and they claimed that Stoffel 
fragment of Taq was better for RAPD. I have also dug up a paper from LaJolla 
where this is claimed. Has anyone experience of getting better RAPD results 
from Stoffel. Is there extra cost and are the results woth it?

Thanks
Chris Jones

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 02 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!MERCURY.UARK.EDU!DRHOADS
From: DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Douglas Rhoads")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Bulk Segregant Analysis
Date: 3 May 1995 05:47:08 -0700
Organization: University of Arkansas
Lines: 44
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <F73BB66E6C@mercury.uark.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

> To:            rapd@net.bio.net
> From:          marchaa@agric.nsw.gov.au (A.Marchant)
> Subject:       Bulk Segregant Analysis
> Date:          2 May 1995 23:38:47 -0500

> Could someone please give me a reference for a clear exposition of the
> principles of bulk segregant analysis using RAPDs - the theory, as well as
> the practical details?
> 
> One thing that I am interested in is the possibility of finding
> markers, using bulk segregant analysis, when near-inbred lines are not
> available.
> 
> Thanks very much,
> 
> 	Adam Marchant
> 	Agricultural Research Institute
> 	Wagga Wagga, NSW
> 	Australia
> 
> 	marchaa@agric.nsw.gov.au
The original reference for Bulked Segregant Analysis (BSA) is from 


 Michelmore,RW; Paran,I; Kesseli,RV (1991): Identification of markers
 linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: A rapid
 method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using
 segregating populations. PNAS, USA 88, 9828-9832.

A good article on the use of BSA (as well as other approaches is

Tanksley,SD; Ganal,MW; Martin,GB (1995): Chromosome landing: a paradigm
for map-based gene cloning in plants with large genomes. T.I.G. 11, 63-
68.

By the way, I believe NIL stands for Near-Isogenic Lines.
//========================================================\\
||Doug Rhoads              || Dept. of Biological Sciences||
||drhoads@mercury.uark.edu || 601 Science Engineering     ||
||drhoads@uafsysb.uark.edu || University of Arkansas      ||
||501-575-3251             || Fayetteville, AR 72701      ||
==========================================================||
||     My Dogma Just Got Run Over by Someone's Karma      ||
\\========================================================//

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 02 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!BRADLEY.BRADLEY.EDU!rrs
From: rrs@BRADLEY.BRADLEY.EDU (Robert Stephens)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Bulk Segregant Analysis
Date: 3 May 1995 14:46:41 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 10
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9505031606.B1983-0100000@bradley.bradley.edu>
References: <F73BB66E6C@mercury.uark.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

And T. I. G. stands for----
Thanks

rrs@bradley.bradley.edu
Robert Rhea Stephens
Biology Department
Bradley University
Peoria, IL 61625



From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 02 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!warwick!news.ncl.ac.uk!usenet
From: Guy Reeves <R.Guy.Reeves@ncl.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: sizing DNA using RAPDS?
Date: 28 Apr 1995 13:24:16 GMT
Organization: Newcastle University
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <3nqqa0$o0s@whitbeck.ncl.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: beck16.ncl.ac.uk
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.5

 I am interested in finding out the maximum 
amplifyable length of DNA from samples that 
have been either degraded  and/or  chemically 
modified.
  I am thinking of trying RAPDs to do this, 
using the assumption that the largest fragment 
amplified will be a reasonable indicator of the 
size of DNA that could be amplified using 
conventional PCR primers.  
I have no experience of  using RAPDs and 
would be grateful for any body's opinion as to 
whether it is a feasible approach or if anybody 
has successfully applied such an approach?
I am thinking of using several RAPD primers 
in the same reaction or useing very short 
(6mers) primers to ensure that lack of suitably 
complementary sites doesn't limit the 
approach.

Thanks in advance for any help.

Guy


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 03 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!HARPO.TNSTATE.EDU!GAWELN
From: GAWELN@HARPO.TNSTATE.EDU
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Stoffel fragment and RAPDs
Date: 4 May 1995 06:05:12 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 10
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <01HQ3J9B3M028WXFHY@HARPO.TNSTATE.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

I have used Stoffel fragment to generate RAPDs from a number of genera
and have had good results.  However, a plant I have worked with recently
produced only very small fuzzy bands with Stoffel, but clear sharp bands
with standard Taq.  So you may see some specificity for your DNA.

As far as cost goes, I normally use 1.0-1.5 units/reaction.  At this
concentration Stoffel has been the cheapest of any Taqs I have seen.

Nick Gawel
Tennessee State University

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 03 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news2.near.net!news3.near.net!saturn.caps.maine.edu!maine.maine.edu!io20109
Organization: University of Maine System
Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 22:30:23 EDT
From: <IO20109@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
Message-ID: <95123.223023IO20109@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Stoffel Framgent and RAPD
References: <Chris_Jones.115.000888A5@VME.CCC.NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK>
Lines: 6

I use Stoffel fragment with DNA from seaweed (Fucus) and
it yields more bands, especially of smaller sizes.
I am quite happy with it. It also seems to be less
sensitive to small variations in MgCl2, and that
helps to make results consistent, which is very important
when doing RAPD.
Ester Serrao

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 03 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!acadiau.ca!marlene.snyder
From: marlene.snyder@acadiau.ca ("MARLENE SNYDER")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: NaOH in primers
Date: 4 May 1995 10:06:34 -0700
Organization: Acadia University
Lines: 5
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <2260A4632F6@ace.acadiau.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Andre Hamel suggested using NaOH at 10 mM in RAPD primer solutions in 
order to prevent aggregation.  We have tried using the NaOH but are 
still having mixed results.  I am wondering if others are using NaOH 
in their primers, and what the consensus is on whether it is indeed a 
good idea to store primers in NaOH.

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sat May 06 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!MERCURY.UARK.EDU!DRHOADS
From: DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Douglas Rhoads")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Bulk Segregant Analysis
Date: 7 May 1995 09:25:17 -0700
Organization: University of Arkansas
Lines: 28
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <387A547BA@mercury.uark.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

> Date:          Wed, 3 May 1995 16:45:06 -0500 (CDT)
> From:          Robert Stephens <rrs@bradley.bradley.edu>
> Subject:       Re: Bulk Segregant Analysis
> To:            Douglas Rhoads <DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU>
> Cc:            rapd@net.bio.net

> And T. I. G. stands for----
> Thanks
> 
> rrs@bradley.bradley.edu
> Robert Rhea Stephens
> Biology Department
> Bradley University
> Peoria, IL 61625
> 
> 

Trends in Genetics.


//========================================================\\
||Doug Rhoads              || Dept. of Biological Sciences||
||drhoads@mercury.uark.edu || 601 Science Engineering     ||
||drhoads@uafsysb.uark.edu || University of Arkansas      ||
||501-575-3251             || Fayetteville, AR 72701      ||
==========================================================||
||     My Dogma Just Got Run Over by Someone's Karma      ||
\\========================================================//

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sat May 06 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!CGNET.COM!N.HUANG
From: N.HUANG@CGNET.COM
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: classification with STS
Date: 6 May 1995 23:19:30 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 19
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <01HQ83G0ZWMO004JNM@irri.cgnet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Dear Netters,

We like to classify rice germplasm with STS plus restriction 
digestion.  This might be better than RAPD as the STS is
highly reproducible.  We however have problem on how to
score the STS bands after restriction digestion.  We commonly
obtained a few to several dozen bands when the PCR products digested 
with several 4bp cutters.  Should we score all bands or score only the 
polymorphic ones? In both cases we worry about that we would repeatly
score the same things again and again as the polymorphism (DNA
variation between varieties) can be present in many STS/enzyme 
combination.  Any of you have any idea or know any work (reference)
of this kind of work?  We need your help.  Thanks.

Ning Huang
IRRI
E-mail  N.HUANG@CGNET.COM
FAX     63-2-891-1292


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sat May 06 23:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!news.gun.de!news.hamburg.pop.de!nordwest.pop.de!informatik.uni-bremen.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!news.belwue.de!news.belwue.de!scsing.switch.ch!rzusuntk.unizh.ch!botcannabis.unizh.ch!user
From: frey@umnw.ethz.ch (Daniel Frey)
Subject: gel analysis software
Message-ID: <frey-0305951835330001@botcannabis.unizh.ch>
Sender: newsadm@rzu-news.unizh.ch (CNEWS ADMINISTRATION)
Organization: Geobotanical Institute ETH
X-Newsreader: Value-Added NewsWatcher 2.0b24.0+
Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 16:35:33 GMT
Lines: 14

Hello folks
   I would like to know what kind of software do you use for your gel
analysis?  I tried out GelReader but was not satisfied.  I have seen
another package running on a DOS machine and it seems to be quite good. 
I'd really appriciate to get some ideas on prices, features, problems.

Thanks in advance  Dani  :-)
----------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Frey                             Tel: +41 1 6323854
Geobotanical Institute                  Fax: +41 1 3854204
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
Zollikerstrasse 107
CH-8008 Zuerich                   Email frey@umnw.ethz.ch
----------------------------------------------------------

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sat May 06 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!uunet!news.inhouse.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news
From: Cynthia Helphingstine <76657.42@CompuServe.COM>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.molluscs,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.molbio.yeast,sci.bio,sci.bio.technology
Subject: Customers of Core DNA Sequencing La
Date: 7 May 1995 17:41:54 GMT
Organization: The Biotron Group
Lines: 11
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <3oj0p2$f60$2@mhadg.production.compuserve.com>
Xref: biosci bionet.molbio.molluscs:88 bionet.molbio.rapd:1133 bionet.molbio.yeast:2888 sci.bio:16345 sci.bio.technology:2995

If you manage a lab in the USA that sends DNA samples to a core 
lab for sequencing, we would like to have you participate in a 
market research study we are doing.  By answering our questions, 
you will be contributing to the availability of better sequencing 
products and equipment for all of us.  If you would like to 
participate in this study, please send you name, phone number and 
the best time of day to reach you to 76657.42@compuserve.com. Our 
questions will take about 10 minutes.  Your responses will be 
viewed in aggregate only and we will not release your phone 
number.  If you prefer, you can call us at 1-800-592-9575 x 175 
after 2:00 am Monday May 8.  Thank you!

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 07 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!gatech!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!NewsWatcher!user
From: wfl1@cornell.edu (Warren Frank Lamboy)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Tm values, annealing and amplification
Followup-To: bionet.molbio.rapd
Date: Sun, 07 May 1995 16:34:04 -1200
Organization: Cornell University
Lines: 17
Sender: wfl1@cornell.edu (Verified)
Message-ID: <wfl1-070595163404@132.236.3.170>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 132

Can someone please tell me how one utilizes the Tm (melting temperature) of
a DNA primer in computing the annealing and amplification temperatures for
a PCR amplification?  Are there any references in the literature on this? 
Rummaging around in the dim recesses of my memory, it seems that I once
could have answered this question myself, but not any longer.  

Also, I use the DNASTAR program, and that program gives two different
temperatures, the Davis, Botstein, Roth and the Wallace temperatures.  Are
one or both of these Tm's?  Or are they different animals entirely?   [I do
not have a DNASTAR manual, which I assume would explain this.]  

Thanks a lot for your help on these questions.  

-- 
Warren F. Lamboy                            "It's easy if you know how to
                                             do it, but it's impossible if
                                             you don't know how to do it."

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 08 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!rutgers!csn!silo.nrcs.usda.gov!ftcnews.nrcs.usda.gov!usenet
From: roberts@tfrl.ars.usda.gov
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Gel Analysis
Date: 9 May 1995 20:30:05 GMT
Organization: USDA-SCS NHQ in Fort Collins
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <3oojcd$ong@ftcnews.nrcs.usda.gov>
References: <frey-0805951029210001@botcannabis.unizh.ch>
Reply-To: roberts@tfrl.ars.usda.gov
NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.79.48.2
X-Newsreader: Firefox WinVN 1.0 beta 5

Daniel:

I am using a Windows program called GelCompare which, although somewhat 
difficult to learn because the documentation is somewhat cryptic, is a 
program with many desirable features, especially for RAPD analyses.  One 
nice feature is the ability to combine gels from different primers into a 
composite gel for analysis, making primer selection less subjective.  Gel 
Compare is a product of Applied Maths in Kortrijk, Belgium (I have no 
commercial interest in this company, by the way)

Rodney Roberts

In article <frey-0805951029210001@botcannabis.unizh.ch>, 
frey@umnw.ethz.ch says...
>
>Hello folks
>   I would like to know what kind of software do you use for your gel
>analysis?  I use RAPDs on agarose gel and would like to get an analyse 
of its bands by computer....  


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 08 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!MERCURY.UARK.EDU!DRHOADS
From: DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Douglas Rhoads")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: (none)
Date: 9 May 1995 11:13:25 -0700
Organization: University of Arkansas
Lines: 45
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3556DA080E@mercury.uark.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net




> To:            rapd@net.bio.net
> From:          Christian.Mouton@greb.ulaval.ca (Christian Mouton)
> Subject:       (none)
> Date:          9 May 1995 09:53:55 -0700

> On May 8 1995, Daniel Frey wrote:
> 
> > Hello folks
> >    I would like to know what kind of software do you use for your gel
> > analysis?  I use RAPDs on agarose gel and would like to get an analyse of
> > its bands by computer.  I tried out GelReader but was not satisfied.  I
> > have seen
> > another package running on a DOS machine and it seems to be quite good.
>  > I'd really appriciate to get some ideas on prices, features, problems.
> >
> 
> Check with P.A.D. Grimont, Institut Pasteur, Paris, who wrote "Taxolab
> softwares" for Mac: RestrictoScan, RestrictoTyper, Adanson. They are
> intended for ribotyping or RFLP but using an inverted image they perform
> extremely well with RAPD fingerprints and are at affordable price.
> 
> pgrimont@pasteur.fr (Patrick A. D. Grimont)
> 
> The postal address is : Institut Pasteur, Service des Entirobactiries, 28
> rue du Docteur-Roux, 75724 Paris cedex 15 France
> 
> regards,
> 

Could you define `affordable' please.  To some $5000 US is 
affordable.  But to some of us $50 is affordable.

 
 
//========================================================\\
||Doug Rhoads              || Dept. of Biological Sciences||
||drhoads@mercury.uark.edu || 601 Science Engineering     ||
||drhoads@uafsysb.uark.edu || University of Arkansas      ||
||501-575-3251             || Fayetteville, AR 72701      ||
==========================================================||
||     My Dogma Just Got Run Over by Someone's Karma      ||
\\========================================================//

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 08 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!ASRR.ARSUSDA.GOV!abartlet
From: abartlet@ASRR.ARSUSDA.GOV ("Alan C. Bartlett")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Gel Analysis
Date: 9 May 1995 07:53:10 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 28
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950509103206.24186B-100000@asrr.arsusda.gov>
References: <frey-0805951029210001@botcannabis.unizh.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

You could take a look at RFLPscan from Scanalytics, 40 Linnell Circle,=20
Billerica, MA 01821.  This programs runs in Windows.  It will read TIF or=
=20
BMP files from a scanner or other type of system that can produce a=20
graphics file.  You can mark lanes and bands, do desmiling and background=
=20
corrections, etc.  It will accept labels for each lane and molecular=20
weight or rf standards for band analysis and will print and store the=20
results of the analysis.  The latest version contains a database function=
=20
for comparison of lanes even across gels.  The program is kind of=20
expensive,  I think it is around $5000 for one user.  The 800 number for=20
customer support is 8=FC0-325-3110.  I assume they could give you further=
=20
information.  We have used the program for almost 3 years and have  found=
=20
it very useful.  For example, in the database you can ask questions such=20
as: "Which lanes are the most similar to lane 7"  Or "which lanes have=20
bands with a molecular weight (bp) between 430 and 450" etc.  The program=
=20
has run well on machines from 386 to pentium.

Alan C. Bartlett
"GENES-R-US"
"ALTERATIONS AVAILABLE!^"
"^some restrictions may apply:)"



From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 08 23:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!Germany.EU.net!news.dfn.de!scsing.switch.ch!rzusuntk.unizh.ch!botcannabis.unizh.ch!user
From: frey@umnw.ethz.ch (Daniel Frey)
Subject: Gel Analysis
Message-ID: <frey-0805951029210001@botcannabis.unizh.ch>
Sender: newsadm@rzu-news.unizh.ch (CNEWS ADMINISTRATION)
Organization: Geobotanical Institute ETH
X-Newsreader: Value-Added NewsWatcher 2.0b24.0+
Date: Mon, 8 May 1995 08:29:21 GMT
Lines: 16

Hello folks
   I would like to know what kind of software do you use for your gel
analysis?  I use RAPDs on agarose gel and would like to get an analyse of
its bands by computer.  I tried out GelReader but was not satisfied.  I
have seen
another package running on a DOS machine and it seems to be quite good.
I'd really appriciate to get some ideas on prices, features, problems.

Thanks in advance  Dani  :-)
----------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Frey                             Tel: +41 1 6323854
Geobotanical Institute                  Fax: +41 1 3854204
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
Zollikerstrasse 107
CH-8008 Zuerich                   Email frey@umnw.ethz.ch
----------------------------------------------------------

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 08 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!greb.ulaval.ca!Christian.Mouton
From: Christian.Mouton@greb.ulaval.ca (Christian Mouton)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: (none)
Date: 9 May 1995 09:53:55 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 37
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <9505091654.AA21845@hermes.ulaval.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

On May 8 1995, Daniel Frey wrote:

> Hello folks
>    I would like to know what kind of software do you use for your gel
> analysis?  I use RAPDs on agarose gel and would like to get an analyse of
> its bands by computer.  I tried out GelReader but was not satisfied.  I
> have seen
> another package running on a DOS machine and it seems to be quite good.
 > I'd really appriciate to get some ideas on prices, features, problems.
>

Check with P.A.D. Grimont, Institut Pasteur, Paris, who wrote "Taxolab
softwares" for Mac: RestrictoScan, RestrictoTyper, Adanson. They are
intended for ribotyping or RFLP but using an inverted image they perform
extremely well with RAPD fingerprints and are at affordable price.

pgrimont@pasteur.fr (Patrick A. D. Grimont)

The postal address is : Institut Pasteur, Service des Entérobactéries, 28
rue du Docteur-Roux, 75724 Paris cedex 15 France

regards,

-----------------------------Christian Mouton-----------------------------
Groupe de Recherche en Écologie Buccale
tél. (418)656-5872
Faculté de médecine dentaire
fax. (418)656-2861
Université Laval
Email: Christian.Mouton@greb.ulaval.ca
Québec (Québec)
G1K 7P4  CANADA






From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 08 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!SERVIDOR.DGSCA.UNAM.MX!carvalho
From: carvalho@SERVIDOR.DGSCA.UNAM.MX (Carvalho Torres Alexandro cassio-UACPYP)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Gel Analysis
Date: 9 May 1995 08:12:20 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 28
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950509091131.21702C-100000@servidor>
References: <frey-0805951029210001@botcannabis.unizh.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net



On Mon, 8 May 1995, Daniel Frey wrote:

> Hello folks
>    I would like to know what kind of software do you use for your gel
> analysis?  I use RAPDs on agarose gel and would like to get an analyse of
> its bands by computer.  I tried out GelReader but was not satisfied.  I
> have seen
> another package running on a DOS machine and it seems to be quite good.
 > I'd really appriciate to get some ideas on prices, features, problems.
> 
> Thanks in advance  Dani  :-)
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Daniel Frey                             Tel: +41 1 6323854
> Geobotanical Institute                  Fax: +41 1 3854204
> Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
> Zollikerstrasse 107
> CH-8008 Zuerich                   Email frey@umnw.ethz.ch
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
Dear Dani.
I use for analysis of my gel The Gel Compar 3.1 for windows. I scanned my 
negative for the pollaroid photos and after tahta I analyse the tif 
archive in the program. If youy like I could send you the address of this 
company. best regards. Alexandro carvalho.
FAX 525 513 0010

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 09 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!adam.cc.sunysb.edu!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!usenet
From: mmg6@psu.edu (mmg6)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Tm values, annealing and amplification
Date: 10 May 1995 01:48:57 GMT
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 6
Sender: mmg6@hearst.cac.psu.edu
Message-ID: <3op629$ial@hearst.cac.psu.edu>
References: <wfl1-070595163404@132.236.3.170>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp112.cac.psu.edu
X-Authinfo-User: mmg6@psu.edu
X-Posted-From: InterNews 1.0.4@ppp112.cac.psu.edu
X-Authenticated: mmg6 on INN host hearst.cac.psu.edu

For oligos 20 bp or less the Tm can be calculated thusly - 2 C for each
A or T and 4 C for each G or C - the sum equal the Tm.  

Cheers,

Michael

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 10 23:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!adam.cc.sunysb.edu!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!decwrl!tribune.usask.ca!canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca!newsflash.concordia.ca!CC.UMontreal.CA!landryp
From: landryp@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Landry Pierre-Alexandre)
Subject: number of markers needed in genetic distance ????
Message-ID: <landryp.800229827@alize.ERE.UMontreal.CA>
Keywords: population, genetic distance
Sender: news@cc.umontreal.ca (Administration de Cnews)
Organization: Universite de Montreal
Date: Thu, 11 May 1995 22:03:47 GMT
Lines: 11

I would like to know if anyone ever worked on a relation between the 
number of RAPD markers and genetic distances calculated?  In other words, 
how many markers should be used to calculate the genetic distance in 
order to obtain something that will be constant for all the individuals 
in the same population vs another population?  And is this number of 
markers the same for comparisons of genetic distances between species, 
families or classes?

Thanks in advance,

PA

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Wed May 10 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.starnet.net!wupost!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: Michal Pater <katgenmi@uoo.univ.szczecin.pl>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Dreissena
Date: 11 May 1995 09:02:43 +0100
Lines: 14
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <3osgb3$bab@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Original-To: rapd@dl.ac.uk


Hello,
I would like to investigate Dreissena polymorpha by rapd method.
Does anybody work on this material? I am interested in DNA isolation
protocol, thermocycler's profile and articles about molecular researches on 
Dreissena or similer objects. I will be very glad for each information.

Michal Pater
Department of Genetics US
Lukasinskiego 43
71-215 Szczecin
Poland
katgenmi@uoo.univ.szczecin.pl


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Thu May 11 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!SASK.USASK.CA!MARILLIA
From: MARILLIA@SASK.USASK.CA
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: (none)
Date: 12 May 1995 07:50:47 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 1
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <01HQERG5FYRO8WW9ZM@SKYCAT.USask.CA>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

please unsubscribe me from RAPD

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sat May 13 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!xlink.net!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!news.uni-ulm.de!news
From: Flavio Ortigao <ortigao>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: INTERACTIVA The VIRTUAL LABORATORY
Date: 14 May 1995 10:18:04 GMT
Organization: University of Ulm, Germany
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <3p4lcs$ss4@waage.rz.uni-ulm.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pintado.physik.uni-ulm.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP22)
X-URL: news:bionet.molbio.rapd

INTERACTIVA was established to design, manufacture and market new products for the
biomedical community. We are proud to present the VIRTUAL LABORATORY.
Our goal is to provide scientists from all over the world with the virtual access to a
real state of the art, laboratory for oligonucleotide and oligopeptide synthesis. We
offer more than products, we offer information systems.
Welcome to visit us at http://pintado.physik.uni-ulm.de

Best regards, Flavio Ramalho Ortigao, CEO
-- 
OLIGONUCLEOTIDES&OLIGOPEPTIDESBIOPOLYMERSWORLDWIDEINFORMATIONSYSTEM
J. F. Ramalho Ortigao, PhD, CEO/INTERACTIVA/SEDANSTRASSE 10/D-89077 ULM/
PHONE +49 731 935 79 59/FAX +49 731 935 79 79/E-MAIL
flavio.ortigao@physik.uni-ulm.de/URL http://pintado.physik.uni-ulm.de
http://www.interactiva.de


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 14 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.uoregon.edu!gaia.ucs.orst.edu!transgene.FSL.ORST.EDU!rottmann
From: rottmann@fsl.orst.edu (William H. Rottmann)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: quality of primers, UBC vs Operon
Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 14:01:02
Organization: Forestry Sciences Lab
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <rottmann.23.000E04DD@fsl.orst.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: transgene.fsl.orst.edu
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]

Our lab has noticed that more people are using Operon primers as compared to 
UBC primers.  Because we are concerned about the reproducibility of our 
reactions, we were wondering if there was a technical reason for the apparent 
preference.  Is anyone aware of quality differences between primers from the 
two sources that affect reproducibility, strength of bands, total yield, 
background smearing?

Will Rottmann
Forest Science
Oregn State University

rottmann@fsl.orst.edu

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 14 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!demon!doc.news.pipex.net!pipex!uknet!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: BANANA & PLANTAIN <N.C.Pancholi@reading.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Help required on finding e-mail address in Turkey...
Date: 15 May 1995 10:58:34 +0100
Lines: 27
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <3p78ka$b47@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Original-To: Plant Biology <plantbio@dl.ac.uk>, RAPD <rapd@dl.ac.uk>

Hello Netters,

I would be greatful if anyone can forward an e-mail address for any one 
of the following from TUBITAK, Marmara Research Center, Department of 
Biology, Gebze-Kocaeli, Istanbul, Turkey:

Gozukirmizi Nermin,
Ari S.,
Gurel F.,
Gumusel F. or
Girakoglu B.

Thanks in advance.

-Naresh


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
      NARESH PANCHOLI
      AGRICULTURAL BOTANY            PHONE: +44 1734 875123 EXT. 4087     
      SCHOOL OF PLANT SCIENCES       FAX:   +44 1734 316577
      UNIVERSITY OF READING
      READING RG6 6AS
      ENGLAND                                   N.C.PANCHOLI@READING.AC.UK
-------------------------------------------------------------------------



From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 14 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!msunews!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.uwa.edu.au!newsman.csu.murdoch.edu.au!newsman.csu.murdoch.edu.au!usenet
From: morgan@numbat.murdoch.edu.au (Una Morgan)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: RAP-RNA fingerprinting problems
Date: 15 May 1995 01:48:52 GMT
Organization: Murdoch University
Lines: 25
Sender: -Not-Authenticated-[4945]
Message-ID: <3p6bu4INNn0i@newsman.murdoch.edu.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vetmac2.murdoch.edu.au
X-Posted-From: InterNews 1.0.1@vetmac2.murdoch.edu.au
Xdisclaimer: No attempt was made to authenticate the sender's name.

Help? I've been trying to generate RNA fingerprints using arbitrarily
primed PCR on viral RNA. I used Promega AMV RT for the first strand
synthesis using the supplied first strand recation buffer and Tth plus
polymerase for the second strand reaction. The first couple of
reactions I ran looked very promising i.e some background smearing but
also numerous distinct bands 1.5kb to 100bp in the test reaction and
nothing in the negative controls. (The negative controls consisted of
an aliquot of the first strand reaction minus RNA added to the PCR
reaction). The last few reactions I have run have resulted in smears in
the tests and lots of bands in the negative controls. Increasing the
stringency of the second strand reaction results in the disappearence
of everything in the tests as well as the negative controls. In theory,
DNA contamination should not cause this because AP PCR fingerprinting
of DNA requires at least two low stringency cycles to permit initial
priming events to occur in opposite directions. Primers that do not
normally result in bands in the negative control under standard RAPD
condition for DNA amplification are generating numerous bands under
these conditions. The reaction temperature for the first strand
reaction was 42 degrees and the cycling conditions for the second
reaction was one cycle of  94-5 min; 50-5 min; 72-5 min followed by 42
cycles of 94-1 min; 60-1 min and 72-2 min and a final cycle of 72-10
min. Does anyone have any ideas of what I can try next?

Thanks
Una Morgan

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 14 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!KORYU.STATCI.GO.JP!tsu01135
From: tsu01135@KORYU.STATCI.GO.JP ("R.F.Whittier")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: The Accordian Effect
Date: 14 May 1995 18:34:28 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 56
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <9505150135.AA01658@koryu.statci.go.jp>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

>Subject: number of markers needed in genetic dist

>Date: Thu, 11 May 1995 22:03:47 GMT
>From: landryp@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Landry Pierre-Alexandre)
>Errors-To: BIOSCI-REQUEST@net.bio.net
>To: rapd@net.bio.net

>I would like to know if anyone ever worked on a relation
>between the number of RAPD markers and genetic distances
>calculated?  In other words, how many markers should be used to
>calculate the genetic distance in order to obtain something
>that will be constant for all the individuals in the same
>population vs another population?  And is this number of
>markers the same for comparisons of genetic distances between
>species, families or classes?

>Thanks in advance,

>PA

It's a trivial point, but nevertheless of over-riding practical
importance that marker mis-scoring expands genetic maps. The
more markers used, the greater this accordian effect will be.
For each per cent mis-scoring of each marker, the calculated map
will expand by as much as 2 bogus centimorgans (one cM on each
side of the marker). One mild example of this accordian effect
is the map of Arabidopsis thaliana, as based upon mapping of
various molecular markers in the recombinant inbred (RI) lines
of Lister & Dean (1993, Plant J., 4, 745-750). The original map,
based upon 67 loci (66 RFLP and one phenotypic, largest gap:
27.2 cM) indicated a total of 283 cM. Their most recent map sent
to the Arabidopsis news group, now with 301 markers, indicates
578 cM separating what were the most distal markers on the
original map. This mapping is based upon the same population of
RI lines. Actually, the absence of an even greater accordian
effect indicates to me that most of the loci were scored with
remarkably high accuracy. All the same, I'd lay odds that most
of the observed expansion is bogus.

RAPD scoring tends to be less accurate than for the sorts of
markers used in the Arabidopsis map, although reproducibility
varies from marker to marker. In the best RAPD studies I have
seen (e.g. Grattapaglia and Sederoff, 1994, Genetics 137: 1121--
1137) a subset of the most reliable RAPD markers, 5 to 20 cM
apart, is selected and used as "framework" markers to establish
the overall genetic map, including map distance from end to end.
Other markers are then intercalated into this map, without
affecting the calculations of map distance between the framework
markers.

Cheers,

Bob Whittier
Mitsui Plant Biotechnology Research Institute
E-mail: tsu01135@koryu.statci.go.jp


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 15 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!UCRAC1.UCR.EDU!judelson
From: judelson@UCRAC1.UCR.EDU (Howard S. Judelson)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: quality of primers, UBC vs operon vs. genosys
Date: 16 May 1995 12:29:24 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 31
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199505161925.AA02379@postman>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

>Our lab has noticed that more people are using Operon primers as compared to 
>UBC primers.  Because we are concerned about the reproducibility of our 
>reactions, we were wondering if there was a technical reason for the apparent 
>preference.  Is anyone aware of quality differences between primers from the 
>two sources that affect reproducibility, strength of bands, total yield, 
>background smearing?


I have used all of the Operon primers (1000?), about 300 of the UBC
primers, and 20 primers from Genosys. We have been amplifying DNA from
Phytophthora infestans.  

For the UBC and Genosys primers, we had to use about 3 times more primer
(by OD based on  the manufacturers' data) in order to get decent banding
patterns.  The bands were usually very faint or nonexistent if we used the
standard amounts.  About 90% of the Operon primers gave good banding
patterns while 70% of the primers from the other sources gave good patterns
(using 3X of our standard volume).  When the primers worked there was no
obvious differences in the number of bands observed.  

For the UBC primers we frequently ran out of certain primers since we had
to use a lot more primer per reaction, and had to get them custom
synthesized.

Howard Judelson
Department of Plant Pathology
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521
USA



From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 15 23:00:00 1995
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!msunews!netnews.upenn.edu!newshost!jtudor
From: jtudor@sju.edu (John Tudor)
Subject: RAPD Analysis?
Message-ID: <D8o6Bv.Bys@sju.edu>
Organization: Saint Joseph's University
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Date: Tue, 16 May 1995 11:52:43 GMT
Lines: 6

I have RAPD data for fourteen different strains of bacteria.
I would like to arrange them on a relatedness diagram, such
as a dendrogram.  Does anyone know of a rather simple computer
program that I could use that would help me construct such
a diagram?  If so, is it available at an ftp or www site?
Thanks for whatever info you can give.

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 15 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!MERCURY.UARK.EDU!DRHOADS
From: DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Douglas Rhoads")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: quality of primers, UBC vs Operon
Date: 16 May 1995 05:34:49 -0700
Organization: University of Arkansas
Lines: 33
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <2D75D916EC@mercury.uark.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

> To:            rapd@net.bio.net
> From:          rottmann@fsl.orst.edu (William H. Rottmann)
> Subject:       quality of primers, UBC vs Operon
> Date:          Mon, 15 May 1995 14:01:02

> Our lab has noticed that more people are using Operon primers as compared to
> UBC primers.  Because we are concerned about the reproducibility of our
> reactions, we were wondering if there was a technical reason for the apparent
> preference.  Is anyone aware of quality differences between primers from the
> two sources that affect reproducibility, strength of bands, total yield,
> background smearing?
> 
> Will Rottmann
> Forest Science
> Oregn State University
> 
> rottmann@fsl.orst.edu
> 

We have used over 800 primers from UBC and about 20 from Operon.  
Initially, the reason was cost.   A large collection was required for 
our genome scanning project and we more easily  afford sets of 100 
primers rather than sets of 20.  I also believe Operon has done a 
good job of advertising whereas UBC has advertised only by email and 
word of mouth.  We have never had any problems with the UBC primers.
//========================================================\\
||Doug Rhoads              || Dept. of Biological Sciences||
||drhoads@mercury.uark.edu || 601 Science Engineering     ||
||drhoads@uafsysb.uark.edu || University of Arkansas      ||
||501-575-3251             || Fayetteville, AR 72701      ||
==========================================================||
||     My Dogma Just Got Run Over by Someone's Karma      ||
\\========================================================//

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 15 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.uoregon.edu!gaia.ucs.orst.edu!news.uidaho.edu!raven.csrv.uidaho.edu!will9369
From: will9369@raven.csrv.uidaho.edu (Williams Karren)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: public domain neuro tests
Date: 11 May 1995 07:18:22 GMT
Organization: University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho
Lines: 4
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3osdnu$cd@newshound.uidaho.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: raven.csrv.uidaho.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

I am looking for public domain neuropsych tests which have strong 
established norms.  If you have suggestions, please let me know at 
will9369@uidaho.edu, thanks!


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 16 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!acadiau.ca!marlene.snyder
From: marlene.snyder@acadiau.ca ("MARLENE SNYDER")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: UBC primer concentration
Date: 17 May 1995 07:18:10 -0700
Organization: Acadia University
Lines: 9
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <5932FA1D62@ace.acadiau.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

I was very interested to read the comment about the UBC primers and 
the fact that concentration had to be boosted to get good banding 
patterns.  We went to 5x the recommended concentration, and at the 
concentration get good results, but got negligible banding at the 
recommended concentration.  Re-ordering specific primers is pretty 
inexpensive, so we haven't minded too much the fact that we go 
through them a little more rapidly than expected.

Marty Snyder

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 16 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!BRADLEY.BRADLEY.EDU!rrs
From: rrs@BRADLEY.BRADLEY.EDU (Robert Stephens)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: UBC primer concentration
Date: 17 May 1995 09:40:22 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 23
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9505171107.A3759-0100000@bradley.bradley.edu>
References: <5932FA1D62@ace.acadiau.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hi, Marty.
What organism(s) do you study?
Bob
rrs@bradley.bradley.edu
Robert Rhea Stephens
Biology Department
Bradley University
Peoria, IL 61625

On 17 May 1995, MARLENE SNYDER wrote:

> I was very interested to read the comment about the UBC primers and 
> the fact that concentration had to be boosted to get good banding 
> patterns.  We went to 5x the recommended concentration, and at the 
> concentration get good results, but got negligible banding at the 
> recommended concentration.  Re-ordering specific primers is pretty 
> inexpensive, so we haven't minded too much the fact that we go 
> through them a little more rapidly than expected.
> 
> Marty Snyder
> 
> 


From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 16 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!SERVIDOR.DGSCA.UNAM.MX!carvalho
From: carvalho@SERVIDOR.DGSCA.UNAM.MX (Carvalho Torres Alexandro cassio-UACPYP)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: RAPD Analysis?
Date: 16 May 1995 17:09:56 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 21
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950516180721.10891B-100000@servidor>
References: <D8o6Bv.Bys@sju.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

 

On Tue, 16 May 1995, John Tudor wrote:

> I have RAPD data for fourteen different strains of bacteria.
> I would like to arrange them on a relatedness diagram, such
> as a dendrogram.  Does anyone know of a rather simple computer
> program that I could use that would help me construct such
> a diagram?  If so, is it available at an ftp or www site?
> Thanks for whatever info you can give.
> 
> 
Dear Tudor,
We could make a matriz, like presence of a band (1) and non-presence (0). 
Wiht htis results you could nalyse your data in program like SSPC. This 
program you could analyse your data and make phylogenetic tree.

Luck
Best regards.
Alexxandro carvalho
INNSZ. Mexico City.

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 21 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!rutgers!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!pipex!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: "R.Rapley" <apx085@coventry.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: RNA analysis & PCR methods courses
Date: 22 May 1995 13:30:18 +0100
Lines: 47
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <3pq04q$ri7@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
X-Sender: apx085@rowan
MIME-Version: 1.0
Original-To: bionews@dl.ac.uk, bioforum@dl.ac.uk, methods@dl.ac.uk, rapd@dl.ac.uk,
 plantbio@dl.ac.uk, microbio@dl.ac.uk, sci.bio.usenet@decwrl.com,
 sci.bio.technology.usenet@decwrl.com

                           RNA Extraction & Analysis
                           =========================

                    20 September 1995 & 19th December 1995

                          PCR Methods & Applications
                          ==========================

                    21 September 1995 & 20th December 1995

                           Coventry University, UK


These are two one day laboratory based practical courses that may be
attended alone or as a two day course. They provide a basic
introduction into the extraction and characterisation of RNA and the
techniques and applications of the PCR.

The practical component is supplemented by seminars and demonstrations
in related topics such as ; Northern blotting, mRNA isolation, RPA & S1
mapping, rRNA isolation, cDNA synthesis & RT-PCR etc. for the RNA
course. For the PCR course, Microbe identification, probe preparation,
PCR cloning & sequencing and primer design will be among the topics.  

These introductory courses will be of interest to those initiating work
in these areas or wishing to update their knowledge.  Fees are GBP100
for each course inclusive of lunch, tea/coffee. For attendance at both
courses the fee is GBP160. 

Further Information and Registration forms:

           Debbie Elliott,
           Commercial Development Unit,
           Coventry University,
           Priory Street,
           Coventry,
           CV1 5FB
           United Kingdom.

           Tel.  01203 838145
           Fax.  01203 221396
           email  Dr Ralph Rapley (rapley@coventry.ac.uk)

*************************************************************************




From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 21 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!rutgers!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!news.bc.net!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news
From: your.id@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (your name)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: HELP: guinea pig cDNA library needed
Date: 22 May 1995 21:14:36 GMT
Organization: University of Alberta
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <3pqurs$1rsc@rover.ucs.ualberta.ca>
Reply-To: khull@physio.med.ualberta.ca
NNTP-Posting-Host: wombat.physio.med.ualberta.ca
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.4

I'm trying to find a guinea pig hepatic cDNA library.  Stratagene doesn't
have one, Clontech has one, but in a poor vector, and I don't know where
else to look.  Any ideas? 

Thanks,

Kerry

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 21 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!LIFSCI.SDSU.EDU!MCCLELLAND
From: MCCLELLAND@LIFSCI.SDSU.EDU
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: postdoc
Date: 22 May 1995 13:47:39 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 46
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <950522060004.20200704@LIFSCI.SDSU.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

PLEASE POST			Postdoctoral Fellowship 
				Salmonella genome

May 22nd 1995

Dear colleague,

	The primary postdoc on our Salmonella project has been 
offered his own laboratory at DOE/WSU. I am thus looking for someone to 
take over his position as soon as possible. If you know someone who might 
be interested I would be grateful if you could direct that person to me by 
e-mail to McClelland@lifsci.sdsu.edu or by FAX to 619 535 5472. 

	The first step of this project is well advanced with 95% of the 
genome covered by an order and overlapping set of lambda clones. 
Approximately, 20% of these have been restriction mapped. We have 
delineated in these clones many of the known loops that distinguish 
Salmonella from E. coli. 

	The most interesting part of the project is just starting in which we 
delineate the role of some of these lifestyle-specific regions. The next 
stage of the project will also involve the use of RNA fingerprinting by 
arbitiarily primed PCR in identify coordinately regulated genes in point 
mutations and large deletions in these regions (Wong K.K. and McClelland 
M. 1994. A stress-induced gene from Salmonella typhimurium identified by 
arbitrarily primed PCR of RNA (RAP). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91:639-
643; McClelland et al., Trends in Genetics, June 1995). Se also Wong K.K. 
and McClelland M. 1994. High-resolution restriction map for a 240-
kilobase region spanning 91- to 96 minutes on the Salmonella 
typhimurium LT2 genome. J. Bacteriol. 176: 5729-5734.

	I am seeking someone with leadership and organizational skills who 
will coordinate with our collaborator Ken Sanderson and will direct a 
technician on the project. I would greatly appreicate your help in locating 
such an individual.

Michael McClelland
Director, 
Cal. Inst. Biol. Research
11099 North Torrey Pines Road
La Jolla
CA 92037

Phone 	619 535 5486
FAX 		619 535 5472
E-mail 	McClelland@lifsci.sdsu.edu

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 21 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!CORNELL.EDU!gsr1
From: gsr1@CORNELL.EDU (Geoffrey Rule)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Discriminating primers for L. monocytogenes ET types
Date: 22 May 1995 11:16:50 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 20
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <v02110100abe648797b87@[132.236.8.54]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Sorry to ask , but what does ET stand for?

Geoff

At 3:22 PM 5/22/95, m.cooper wrote:
>We have tried a range of decamers in our laboratory to attempt to type L.
>momcytogenes within existing ET types.  Obviously the theoretical number
>of different 10 mer
>primers we could look at is prohibitive and so we are keen to know if anyone
>uses a primer not supplied by Operon that is particularly useful for typing.
>
>M. Cooper

Geoffrey S. Rule
Analytical Chemistry Labs
NYSAES/ Cornell University
Geneva, NY 14456
1-315-787-2435



From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 21 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!daresbury!trane.uninett.no!sunic!sunic.sunet.se!seunet!news2.swip.net!doc.news.pipex.net!pipex!uknet!strath-cs!st-and!Aberdeen!mbi049
From: mbi049@abdn.ac.uk (m.cooper)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Discriminating primers for L. monocytogenes ET types
Date: 22 May 1995 15:22:07 GMT
Organization: University of Aberdeen,  Scotland
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <3pqa6v$c3t@nof.abdn.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sysb.abdn.ac.uk
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

We have tried a range of decamers in our laboratory to attempt to type L.
momcytogenes within existing ET types.  Obviously the theoretical number of different 10 mer
primers we could look at is prohibitive and so we are keen to know if anyone
uses a primer not supplied by Operon that is particularly useful for typing.  

M. Cooper

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 22 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!YVAX.BYU.EDU!anderswr
From: anderswr@YVAX.BYU.EDU (W. Ralph Andersen)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: (none)
Date: 23 May 1995 10:42:29 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 7
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <01HQUALTY5FUA23COZ@yvax.byu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Doug R. was concerned about how some of us users of RAPD primers feel about
his product and service compared to the "other" company.  We have used the
full slate of Operon and UBC primers during the sugarcane mapping project. 
In terms of the good quality of product and very satisfactory service we
would highly recommend both sources to our colleagues.    Ralph Andersen



From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 22 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: "Miss D.A. Heipel" <D.A.Heipel@liverpool.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: RAPDPLOT
Date: 23 May 1995 10:06:46 +0100
Lines: 5
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <3ps8j6$jd@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Original-To: rapd@dl.ac.uk

Does anybody know where I can get a copy of RAPDPLOT from?

Diana Heipel
Port Erin Marine Laboratory
Port Erin, Isle of Man, UK

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 22 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!gatech!newsfeed.pitt.edu!godot.cc.duq.edu!ddsw1!vanbc.wimsey.com!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!news.ucdavis.edu!dale!ez007415
From: ez007415@dale.ucdavis.edu (Marilyn Warburton)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: RAPDs vs coefficent of coancestry
Date: 22 May 1995 22:37:26 GMT
Organization: University of California, Davis
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <3pr3n6$2r9@mark.ucdavis.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dale.ucdavis.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Hello, netters, gotta question for you.

	Does anyone have citations for the latest (or any!) papers which 
compare genetic similarities based on RAPDs with the coefficents of 
coancestry (or inbreeidng coefficents) of individuals of known pedigree?  
there dosent seem to be a lot of work in this field...  Thanks in advance 
for your help;

Marilyn Warburton
UCDavis Dept. of Pomology
Davis, CA 95616
mlwarburton@ucdavis.edu

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 22 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: "R.Rapley" <apx085@coventry.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.announce,bionet.general,bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.molbio.rapd,bionet.plants,bionet.microbiology,sci.bio,sci.bio.technology
Subject: RNA analysis & PCR methods courses
Date: 22 May 1995 17:26:05 -0700
Organization: Coventry University
Lines: 45
Sender: biohelp@net.bio.net
Approved: bionews-moderator@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.950518182018.28652A-100000@rowan>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net
Xref: biosci bionet.announce:2110 bionet.general:15336 bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:28634 bionet.molbio.rapd:1162 bionet.plants:6884 bionet.microbiology:2314 sci.bio:16700 sci.bio.technology:3101


                           RNA Extraction & Analysis
                           =========================

                    20 September 1995 & 19th December 1995

                          PCR Methods & Applications
                          ==========================

                    21 September 1995 & 20th December 1995

                           Coventry University, UK


These are two one day laboratory based practical courses that may be
attended alone or as a two day course. They provide a basic
introduction into the extraction and characterisation of RNA and the
techniques and applications of the PCR.

The practical component is supplemented by seminars and demonstrations
in related topics such as ; Northern blotting, mRNA isolation, RPA & S1
mapping, rRNA isolation, cDNA synthesis & RT-PCR etc. for the RNA
course. For the PCR course, Microbe identification, probe preparation,
PCR cloning & sequencing and primer design will be among the topics.  

These introductory courses will be of interest to those initiating work
in these areas or wishing to update their knowledge.  Fees are GBP100
for each course inclusive of lunch, tea/coffee. For attendance at both
courses the fee is GBP160. 

Further Information and Registration forms:

           Debbie Elliott,
           Commercial Development Unit,
           Coventry University,
           Priory Street,
           Coventry,
           CV1 5FB
           United Kingdom.

           Tel.  01203 838145
           Fax.  01203 221396
           email  Dr Ralph Rapley (rapley@coventry.ac.uk)

*************************************************************************

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 22 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!MERCURY.UARK.EDU!DRHOADS
From: DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Douglas Rhoads")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Oops and Re: quality of primers, UBC vs Operon
Date: 23 May 1995 11:33:58 -0700
Organization: University of Arkansas
Lines: 48
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <343B9F26B8@mercury.uark.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

> Date:          Tue, 23 May 1995 11:26:04 -0700
> From:          anderswr@yvax.byu.edu (W. Ralph Andersen)
> Subject:       Re: quality of primers, UBC vs Operon
> To:            DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Douglas Rhoads")

> Doug;  We have used your all of your primers and all of Operon's primers on
> our sugarcane mapping project with the sugarcane consortium for melecular
> biology.  We found no difference in quality or service.  Both are
> excellent.  I would recommend you both highly.
> 
> Sincerely yours, Ralph
> 
> 
> 
>To:               rapd@net.bio.net
>From:             anderswr@yvax.byu.edu (W. Ralph Andersen)
>Subject:          (none)
>Date sent:        23 May 1995 10:42:29 -0700
>
>Doug R. was concerned about how some of us users of RAPD primers feel about
>his product and service compared to the "other" company.  We have used the
>full slate of Operon and UBC primers during the sugarcane mapping project.
>In terms of the good quality of product and very satisfactory service we
>would highly recommend both sources to our colleagues.    Ralph Andersen


First- sorry about the do nothing meaningless email that preceded, 
"fingers doeth without thought!!"

Second- lest there be any confusion, I am not affiliated with John
Hobbs, the NAPS, University of British Columbia, nor am I a
spokesperson for any of these persons or entities.  I have on
occasion expounded on the virtues of the oligo sets from UBC but
should not be construed to be in the business of producing RAPD
primers or other oligos.  I don't even own a synthesizer, I buy
mine. No offense to Ralph or anyone else, I just want to make sure
and clear this up. 

Go Forth and Amplify

//========================================================\\
||Doug Rhoads              || Dept. of Biological Sciences||
||drhoads@mercury.uark.edu || 601 Science Engineering     ||
||drhoads@uafsysb.uark.edu || University of Arkansas      ||
||501-575-3251             || Fayetteville, AR 72701      ||
==========================================================||
||     My Dogma Just Got Run Over by Someone's Karma      ||
\\========================================================//

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Mon May 22 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!MERCURY.UARK.EDU!DRHOADS
From: DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Douglas Rhoads")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: quality of primers, UBC vs Operon
Date: 23 May 1995 11:25:30 -0700
Organization: University of Arkansas
Lines: 33
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <34140E4138@mercury.uark.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

> Date:          Tue, 23 May 1995 11:26:04 -0700
> From:          anderswr@yvax.byu.edu (W. Ralph Andersen)
> Subject:       Re: quality of primers, UBC vs Operon
> To:            DRHOADS@MERCURY.UARK.EDU ("Douglas Rhoads")

> Doug;  We have used your all of your primers and all of Operon's primers on
> our sugarcane mapping project with the sugarcane consortium for melecular
> biology.  We found no difference in quality or service.  Both are
> excellent.  I would recommend you both highly.
> 
> Sincerely yours, Ralph
> 
> 
> 
To:               rapd@net.bio.net
From:             anderswr@yvax.byu.edu (W. Ralph Andersen)
Subject:          (none)
Date sent:        23 May 1995 10:42:29 -0700

Doug R. was concerned about how some of us users of RAPD primers feel about
his product and service compared to the "other" company.  We have used the
full slate of Operon and UBC primers during the sugarcane mapping project.
In terms of the good quality of product and very satisfactory service we
would highly recommend both sources to our colleagues.    Ralph Andersen

//========================================================\\
||Doug Rhoads              || Dept. of Biological Sciences||
||drhoads@mercury.uark.edu || 601 Science Engineering     ||
||drhoads@uafsysb.uark.edu || University of Arkansas      ||
||501-575-3251             || Fayetteville, AR 72701      ||
==========================================================||
||     My Dogma Just Got Run Over by Someone's Karma      ||
\\========================================================//

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 23 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!UKCC.UKY.EDU!DGMILL00
From: DGMILL00@UKCC.UKY.EDU (Don Miller)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: (none)
Date: 24 May 1995 13:51:04 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 1
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199505242050.NAA15234@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

unsubscribe rapd-net

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Tue May 23 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!COSMAIL2.CTD.ORNL.GOV!ygl
From: ygl@COSMAIL2.CTD.ORNL.GOV ("Lee E. Gunter")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: RAPDPLOT
Date: 24 May 1995 05:56:14 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 28
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <328.ygl@cosmail2.ctd.ornl.gov_POPMail.PC_3.2.2>
Reply-To: <ygl@ornl.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

On 23 May 1995 10:06:46 +0100, Miss D.A. Heipel wrote:

>Does anybody know where I can get a copy of RAPDPLOT from?
>
>Diana Heipel
>Port Erin Marine Laboratory
>Port Erin, Isle of Man, UK

RAPDPLOT is available through anonymous ftp from Bill Black at Colorodo 
State:

1. Log on to the network
2. ftp lamar.colostate.edu
3. <user:> anonymous
4. <password:> your id
5. cd pub/wcb4
6. binary
7. dir
You will see a long list of compressed files which can be transferred and 
unzipped using the PKUNZIP program (which is, I think, available at this 
site if you don't already have it).  Good luck!

Lee E. Gunter                         ygl@cosmail2.ctd.ornl.gov: e-mail
Environmental Sciences Division       (615) 576-7697           : phone
Oak Ridge National Laboratory         (615) 576-9939           : fax
Bldg 1506, MS-6034
P.O. Box 2008
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6034

From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Thu May 25 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!VMS2.MACC.WISC.EDU!roc
From: roc@VMS2.MACC.WISC.EDU (Raul O. Castillo)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Use of RAPD for somaclonal variation...
Date: 26 May 1995 16:14:42 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 63
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <25052618141154@vms2.macc.wisc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Date: Fri, 26 May 95 16:33:16 ,  n.c.pancholi@reading.ac.uk:

NARESH PANCHOLI:

You might be working with mitochondrial amplified sequences, that is why
you are getting different polymorphisms. 

I also assume you have the same genotype for every treatment, otherwise
that might be the problem.

Are you tested if the primers are sampling nuclear genome? How about ploidy
level, remember the dominance character of the RAPDs?

Just some thoughts, I hope it is not complicating more.

Cheers,

                               
Raul O. Castillo                                     
ROC@macc.wisc.edu                     
U. of Wisconsin, Horticulture,                    
1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706    
Tel. 608-262 7406, Fax 608-262 4743                 
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""   
                                      
-----> After june 30/95:

Raul O. Castillo                    
castillo@fitogen.sc.iniap.gov.ec
NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF PLANT GENETIC             
RESOURCES (DENAREF)-INIAP 
Casilla 17-01-340                
Quito-Ecuador
Tel. (593-2) 690 691/2/3/4, (593-2) 650 042
FAX: (593-2) 504 240 and 593-2-690-691

























   



From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Thu May 25 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: BANANA & PLANTAIN <N.C.Pancholi@reading.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Use of RAPD for somaclonal variation...
Date: 26 May 1995 21:23:21 +0100
Lines: 40
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <3q5dbp$7a5@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Original-To: RAPD <rapd@dl.ac.uk>, Plant Biology <plantbio@dl.ac.uk>,
 Methods-and-Reagents <methods@dl.ac.uk>

Hello Netters,

I used RAPD for the detection of somaclonal variation in in vitro grown 
banana plants.  I compared plants grown in solid medium (i.e., solidified 
with Gelrite) or liquid medium.  Also, I tested 2 different cytokinins.
The objective was to find the variation generated by different system 
and the degree of variation, if there is any.

Surprisingly, significant somaclonal variation between 2 different media
as well as cytokinins was observed.

I found varied band intensity among variant samples, apart from extra or
missing bands.  My question is whether this change in band intensity
(which was reproducible, so at least it is not because of RAPD parameters)
is really associated with the presence of somaclonal variation?  If so,
then what is the possible explanation?  One in my mind is that this
indicates an alteration in the copy number of gene involved. 

Has anybody observed similar phenomena? Any pointer in this direction 
will be highly appreciated.

Thanks.

Posted to:
bionet.molbio.rapd
bionet.plants
bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
      NARESH PANCHOLI
      AGRICULTURAL BOTANY            PHONE: +44 1734 875123 EXT. 4087     
      SCHOOL OF PLANT SCIENCES       FAX:   +44 1734 316577
      THE UNIVERSITY OF READING
      READING RG6 6AS
      ENGLAND                                   N.C.PANCHOLI@READING.AC.UK
-------------------------------------------------------------------------





From owner-rapd@net.bio.net Sun May 28 23:00:00 1995
Path: biosci!SERVIDOR.DGSCA.UNAM.MX!carvalho
From: carvalho@SERVIDOR.DGSCA.UNAM.MX (Carvalho Torres Alexandro cassio-UACPYP)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.rapd
Subject: Re: Discriminating primers for L. monocytogenes ET types
Date: 29 May 1995 15:08:49 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 6
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950529160858.29937B-100000@servidor>
References: <3pqa6v$c3t@nof.abdn.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Dear Cooper,
Try teh primers descibed by Mazurier et al., I can't remember the year. I 
think is 1992. 
Betst regards,
Alexandro carvalho
Mexico City

