From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Tue Apr 01 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!SELWAY.UMT.EDU!wr
From: wr@SELWAY.UMT.EDU (Rong Wang)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: suicide vectors
Date: 2 Apr 1997 13:53:16 -0800
Organization: The University of Montana
Lines: 5
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3342C682.55F0@selway.umt.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

I am looking for suicide vectors for E. coli.  Any information and
product suggestions are most welcome.

Angelika Longacre
longacre@selway.umt.edu

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Thu Apr 03 23:00:00 1997
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Path: biosci!rutgers.rutgers.edu!gatech!EU.net!news-peer.gsl.net!newsfeed.nacamar.de!azure.xara.net!xara.net!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!uknet!bcc.ac.uk!news
From: Paul Wells <p.wells@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: PRACTICAL COURSE IN GENETIC ENGINEERING
Message-ID: <1997Apr3.141908.28273@ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 14:19:08 GMT
Organization: University College London
Lines: 33

A one week practical course designed to teach the basic
techniques in genetic engineering will be held from
16th-20th June 1997 at the Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
University College London.

A "hands on" approach will enable scientists from
higher education and industry, clinicians and research
workers who have had no practical experience of recombinant
DNA technology to set up such techniques in their own
laboratories.

Techniques to be covered will include, Southern hybridisation
DNA sequencing, PCR, and analysis of cloned DNA using enzyme
restriction mapping. Supplemented with some lectures. 

Course fee 900 pounds sterling (750 for full time postgraduate
students) exclusive of accomodation.

Bed and breakfast accomodation for the period of the course
can be provided in a local hall of residence for 102 pounds
sterling from Sunday 15th June until Saturday 21st June.

Write for application forms and further details to:
Dr. John Ward
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
University College London
Gower Street
London WC1E 6BT
Fax: 0171 380 7193

Or e-mail either:-
j.ward@biochem.ucl.ac.uk
p.wells@ucl.ac.uk


From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Sat Apr 05 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!ODYSSEE.NET!dellaire
From: dellaire@ODYSSEE.NET (Graham Dellaire)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re:suicide vectors
Date: 6 Apr 1997 08:26:05 -0700
Organization: McGill Div. of Experimental Medicine
Lines: 15
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3347BED6.1472@odyssee.net>
Reply-To: dellaire@odyssee.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hello Angelika 

I am aware of one such vector.  It contains a Gata-1 gene from the
mouse.  The Gata 1 gene is toxic to E.coli.  Disruption of the Gata-1
gene leads to rescue of the bacterium, ex. by cloning into the vector. 
Look for the following reference

Trudel P.  Provost S.  Massie B.  Chartrand P.  Wall L.  
    pGATA: a positive selection vector based on the toxicity of
the         transcription factor GATA-1 to
bacteria.                                Biotechniques.  20(4):684-93,
1996 Apr. 


Angelika

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Sun Apr 06 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!rutgers.rutgers.edu!gatech!csulb.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!azure.xara.net!xara.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!uunet!in3.uu.net!136.142.185.26!newsfeed.pitt.edu!newsflash.concordia.ca!feed.umontreal.ca!cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA!szat
From: szat@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Szatmari George)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re: suicide vectors
Date: 7 Apr 97 20:59:05 GMT
Organization: Universite de Montreal
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <szat.860446745@cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA>
References: <3347BED6.1472@odyssee.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cyclone.ere.umontreal.ca
Lines: 20

Regarding suicide vectors in gram neg's, I am aware of several:

ones based on a thermosensitive plasmid replicon (pSC101)
refer to J. Bact 178 p 894 (1996)

ones based on a lambda dv plasmid, which can be inhibited by
the lambda repressor
refer to Flinn et al J. Bact 171 p 2241-3 (1989)

my favorite: based on the R6K replicon, which requires the pi protein
to be supplied in trans
refer to Skzrypek et et Plasmid 29 p 160-3 (1993) (one of many refs)

ones based on a lethal gene (sacB) whos expression is lethal to coli:
see Mobley et al, Mol. Micro 10 pp143-55, 1993

Hope this helps
George Szatmari
Dept de microbiologie, Univ de Montreal


From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Tue Apr 08 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!daresbury!uninett.no!hermod.uio.no!nntp.uio.no!newsfeed.nacamar.de!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.erols.net!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.idt.net!usenet.logical.net!news.dal.ca!news.nstn.ca!newsflash.concordia.ca!news.mcgill.ca!news
From: mdty@musica.mcgill.ca
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Conference June 5-7, 1997 [conf.97] (1/1)
Date: 9 Apr 1997 14:10:40 GMT
Organization: McGill University Computing Centre
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <5ig810$t97@sifon.cc.mcgill.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.168.147.137
X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)

begin 644 CONF.97
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M;6)I82!#86YC97(@4F5S96%R8V@-"B`@("`@($-E;G1E<BX-"DUA<F,M161O
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M1V5N97)A;"!(;W-P:71A;`T*,38U,"!#961A<B!!=F5N=64-"DUO;G1R96%L
M+"!1=65B96,@2#-'(#%!-`T*5&5L93H@*#4Q-"D@.3,W+38P,3$@97AT+C0Q
M-C$O-#$W.0T*1F%X.B`H-3$T*2`Y,S0M.#(R,`T*92UM86EL.B!M9&QE0&UU
M<VEC82YM8V=I;&PN8V$@("!O<B`@(&UD='E`;75S:6-A+FUC9VEL;"YC80T*
M#0I296=I<W1R871I;VX@:6YF;W)M871I;VX@879A:6QA8FQE(&9R;VTZ#0I$
M:6%N82!387)A:0T*0V]O<F1I;F%T;W(-"F4M;6%I;#H@<V%R86E`;65D8V]R
,+FUC9VEL;"YC80T*
`
end

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Tue Apr 08 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!daresbury!uninett.no!hermod.uio.no!nntp.uio.no!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!sprint!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.idt.net!usenet.logical.net!news.dal.ca!news.nstn.ca!newsflash.concordia.ca!news.mcgill.ca!news
From: mdty@musica.mcgill.ca
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Conference June 5-7, 1997 (0/1)
Date: 9 Apr 1997 14:10:36 GMT
Organization: McGill University Computing Centre
Lines: 2
Message-ID: <5ig80s$t97@sifon.cc.mcgill.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.168.147.137
X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)

Conference on: From DNA Damage to Cell Death: The Role of Nuclear Structure in the Response to 
Cancer Therapy.   June 5-7, 1997      Montreal, Canada.

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Tue Apr 08 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!daresbury!uninett.no!nntp.uio.no!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!ais.net!uunet!in3.uu.net!136.142.185.26!newsfeed.pitt.edu!newsflash.concordia.ca!news.mcgill.ca!news
From: mdty@musica.mcgill.ca
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: conference June 5-7, 1997
Date: 9 Apr 1997 14:30:55 GMT
Organization: McGill University Computing Centre
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <5ig96v$t97@sifon.cc.mcgill.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.168.147.137
X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)

Sorry about the earlier posting.   Here is the decoded informations.


Conference:

From DNA Damage to Cell Death: The Role of Nuclear Structure in the Response to Cancer Therapy

June 5-7, 1997
Montreal, Canada


Topic include:
* Nuclear Matrix Organization and Radiation/Drug Sensitivity

* Nuclear Structure in Relation to the Formation of Chromosome Aberrations

* Nuclear Organization, DNA Repair and Apoptosis

*Nuclear Factors Influencing DNA Damage Heterogeneity


Preliminary list of invited speakers:
Joel S. Bedford, Colorado State University
Charles Geard, Columbia University
Walter N. Hittelman, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
George Iliakis, Thomas Jefferson University
Peter J. Johnston, University of British Columbia Cancer Research Centre
Marc-Edouard Mirault, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite Laval
Nancy Oleinick, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine
Peggy Olive, University of British Columbia Cancer Research Centre
Guy Poirier, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite Laval
Joseph Roti Roti, Washington University, St. Louis
Jeffrey L. Schwartz, University of Washington, Seattle


Information:
Drs. Shirley Lehnert and Terry Chow
Radiation Oncology, McGill University
Montreal General Hospital
1650 Cedar Avenue
Montreal, Quebec   H3G 1A4  Canada
Tel:  (514) 937-6011  ext. 4161/4179
Fax: (514) 934-8220
e-mail: mdle@musica.mcgill.ca     or      mdty@musica.mcgill.ca

Registration available upto three weeks befor conference date.  For Information contact:

Diana Sarai
Coordinator
Tel: (514) 398-6268
e-mail: sarai@medcor.mcgill.ca


From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Wed Apr 09 23:00:00 1997
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Path: biosci!daresbury!uninett.no!nntp.uio.no!newsfeeds.sol.net!europa.clark.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!uknet!bcc.ac.uk!news
From: Paul Wells <p.wells@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: PRACTICAL COURSE IN GENETIC ENGINEERING
Message-ID: <1997Apr10.101900.65433@ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 10:19:00 GMT
Organization: University College London
Lines: 33

A one week practical course designed to teach the basic
techniques in genetic engineering will be held from
16th-20th June 1997 at the Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
University College London.

A "hands on" approach will enable scientists from
higher education and industry, clinicians and research
workers who have had no practical experience of recombinant
DNA technology to set up such techniques in their own
laboratories.

Techniques to be covered will include, Southern hybridisation
DNA sequencing, PCR, and analysis of cloned DNA using enzyme
restriction mapping. Supplemented with some lectures. 

Course fee 900 pounds sterling (750 for full time postgraduate
students) exclusive of accomodation.

Bed and breakfast accomodation for the period of the course
can be provided in a local hall of residence for 102 pounds
sterling from Sunday 15th June until Saturday 21st June.

Write for application forms and further details to:
Dr. John Ward
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
University College London
Gower Street
London WC1E 6BT
Fax: 0171 380 7193

Or e-mail either:-
j.ward@biochem.ucl.ac.uk
p.wells@ucl.ac.uk


From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Wed Apr 09 23:00:00 1997
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!europa.clark.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!uknet!bcc.ac.uk!news
From: Paul Wells <p.wells@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Practical introduction to genetic engineering course
Message-ID: <1997Apr10.133521.60390@ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 13:35:21 GMT
Organization: University College London
Lines: 35

A one week practical course designed to teach the basic
techniques in genetic engineering will be held from
16th-20th June 1997 at the Dept. of Biochemistry and 
Molecular Biology University College London. 

A "hands on" approach will enable scientists from
higher education and industry, clinicians and research
workers who have had no practical experience of recombinant
DNA technology to set up such techniques in their own
laboratories.

Techniques to be covered will include, Southern hybridisation
DNA sequencing, PCR, and analysis of cloned DNA using enzyme
restriction mapping. Supplemented with some lectures. 

Course fee 900 pounds sterling (750 for full time postgraduate
students) exclusive of accommodation.

Bed and breakfast accommodation for the period of the course
can be provided in a local hall of residence for 102 pounds
sterling from Sunday 15th June until Saturday 21st June.

<A href"http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/~wells/pige97.htm"
>For further information visit our web site</A>
Write for application forms to:
Dr. John Ward
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
University College London
Gower Street
London WC1E 6BT
Fax: 0171 380 7193

Or e-mail either:-
j.ward@biochem.ucl.ac.uk
p.wells@ucl.ac.uk


From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Sat Apr 12 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!daresbury!uninett.no!nntp.uio.no!newsfeed.nacamar.de!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!sprint!howland.erols.net!news.starnet.net!news.starnet.net!axb.slu.edu!news
From: Nanda Somarajan <somarank@slu.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: subscribe
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 14:51:33 -0500
Organization: Saint Louis University
Lines: 1
Message-ID: <334FE7C5.5992@slu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 165.134.21.45
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
CC: somarank@slu.edu

subscribe bionet-news.bionet.molbio.recombination

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Sun Apr 13 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!ODYSSEE.NET!dellaire
From: dellaire@ODYSSEE.NET ("Graham Dellaire")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: POSTDOC in DNA REPLICATION (Dr. Carl Schildkraut)
Date: 14 Apr 1997 16:18:45 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 48
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <97Apr14.191929-0400_edt.585982-8564+4316@skywalker.microtec.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

To: biojobs@net.bio.net

From: schildkr@aecom.yu.edu (Dr. Carl Schildkraut)

Subject: POSTDOCTORAL FELLOW POSITION, DNA REPLICATION

Date: 3 Apr 1997 16:37:10 GMT


POSTDOCTORAL FELLOW POSITION 

AVAILABLE

A position is available to study the molecular genetics of replication
and the cell cycle in the mammalian genome. We use Epstein-Barr and
human papilloma virus sequences as model systems both in vivo and in
vitro to study site-specific initiation and termination of DNA
replication (Cell 58:527, 1989; Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:6268, 1991; J.
Virol. 67:1739, 1993; Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2893, 1995; J. Biol. Chem.
271:33009, 1996). The replication of globin and immunoglobulin gene
families (Mol. Cell. Biol. 8: 2149 and 4958, 1988; 9:3524, 1989;
10:4314 and 4324, 1990) and the role of replication in oncogene
rearrangements and in development is being investigated. We are
characterizing origins of replication that we have identified in human
rDNA (Mol. Cell. Biol., 13:6600, 1993). Targeted integration mediated
by homologous recombination will be used to modify chromosomal origins
and to determine the sequences critical for origin function. Other
projects include the role of the Locus Control Region (LCR) in the
regulation of replication of globin and immunoglobulin gene loci. The
spatial and temporal organization of DNA replication in mammalian
nuclei is also being studied.

Supported by NIH funding for at least three years. The Albert Einstein
College of Medicine is located in a pleasant, very safe, residential
area of New York.

Send curriculum vitae by both Email and FAX or Air Mail and the names
of three references (including telephone, FAX and Email numbers) to: 

Dr. Carl Schildkraut
Department of Cell Biology (CH 416)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
1300 Morris Park Ave.
New York, New York 10461

Phone (718) 430-2097
FAX (718) 430-8574
Email schildkr@aecom.yu.edu

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Sun Apr 13 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!ODYSSEE.NET!dellaire
From: dellaire@ODYSSEE.NET (Graham Dellaire)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re:Ethics of Genetic Engineering
Date: 14 Apr 1997 16:13:49 -0700
Organization: McGill Div. of Experimental Medicine
Lines: 10
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3352B9E8.93@odyssee.net>
Reply-To: dellaire@odyssee.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Nanda are you familiar with MEDLINE

You can use it from your local library.  Type in Keywords and it will
lead you to articles on Gene Therapy and Genetics.  I believe there is a
Gene Therapy Journal as well and the first 5 issues or so are devoted to
ethical issues of Gene Therapy.  This is really dated already but is a
good start.


Graham

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Sun Apr 13 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!ODYSSEE.NET!dellaire
From: dellaire@ODYSSEE.NET ("Graham Dellaire")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: THE SCIENCE GUIDE (Science News and Much more)
Date: 14 Apr 1997 15:10:16 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 148
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <97Apr14.181102-0400_edt.585891-8564+4211@skywalker.microtec.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net



----------
> From: Robert W. Georgantas III <rgeorgan@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>
> To: GENSTRUCTURE Graham Dellaire <dellaire@odyssee.net>
> Subject: Help with a Posting
> Date: Monday, April 14, 1997 1:28 PM
> 
> To: Graham Dellaire
> Moderator of the GENSTRUCTURE BioNet Discussion Group.
> 
> I was hoping that you could help me, please read the letter below then do

> with it as you wish.
> 
> I am a student with the Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences

> at Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine.  I have started up a 
> small internet site called "The Science Guide" located at the URL 
> http://www.scienceguide.com.  I started the site to address the lack of a

> unifying source of information for scientists on the internet.  As you 
> can see in the announcement below the Guide consists of a number of 
> sections designed to help scientists find information on the internet, 
> The news section is currently our most popular service receiving over 4K 
> visits per day, with a hundreds of subscribers to the Daily News Emailer.
> 
> Since we do not charge for our service, and since we are  not accepting 
> advertisers; we have only a small number of routes by which to spread the

> word about the Guide (we have no advertising budget as well).  One of 
> these routes is by posting to Usenet groups.  We have done this on a 
> small basis by looking at a news group to assure that the users of the 
> group are appropriate for our service, and then posting the Announcement 
> enclosed below to the group.  We Do Not Spam.  Over the last month we 
> have posted to roughly forty news groups and have received a great 
> response in the form of emails telling us how useful our site is, and 
> will become as we add more content to it.  We have not received a single 
> negative response, which we have interpreted to mean that our site is 
> useful enough to scientists that they do not mind our "off-subject" 
> posting.
> 
> That brings me to the crux of the email, I was hoping that you could take

> the time to visit the Science Guide, determine if it would be of use to 
> the subscribers of the group which you modify, and if so - post the 
> announcement text below to the group. This would be of great help to us 
> in getting the word out about the Guide.
> 
> If you feel that this posting would be inappropriate, please accept my 
> apologies for having taken your time, and just disregard this letter.
> 
> One thing that may be particularly of interest, is our plan to start 
> monitoring Congress for bills containing items concerning scientific 
> funding.  We plan on doing this to take advantage of the power of the 
> internet to set up a pseudo lobbying group.  As an example - during the 
> Congressional Debates over the NIH budget a few months ago we encouraged 
> our readers to email their congress-person asking for an increase in the 
> budget.  At the time we had just started the guide and had only a small 
> number of readers, but now that we have literally thousands of users (and

> our usership is growing at 40% per week) and we think that we could make 
> a significant difference in funding by informing our users of congresses'

> actions and helping them to act in writing to the House, or Senate, or 
> President.  
> 
> Thank you 
> Robert Georgantas - The Science Guide
> 
> PS.  You can check to make sure that I am actually who I say that I am 
> buy fingering my student email account: rgeorgan@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu.

>  The Science Guide is hosted under the .com domain by Hway Technologies, 
> because Hopkins was not willing to host a site with our potential
traffic.
> 
> 
> ------------------Announcement Text------------------------
> 
> Announcing the SCIENCE GUIDE.
> http://www.scienceguide.com
> 
> A New Internet Directory and Information Service run by Scientists and 
> Physicians for Scientists and Physicians.  After visiting the Guide, If 
> you have any suggestion for making the Guide better please let us know. 
> (webmaster@scienceguide.com)
> 
> The Science Guide consists of a number of different sections designed to 
> help the scientist and physician find information on the internet and to 
> sponsor communication between those interested in science:
> 
> 
> NEWS SECTION
> 
> Every day the Science Guide compiles medical and research news from 
> national news sources around the net.  Most of the news articles are 
> concerned with medicine, bioscience, and physics, but all other sciences 
> from agriculture to zoology are commonly included. News sources currently

> listed include: CNN, EurekAlert, HMS Beagle, MSNBC Sci-Tech, Science 
> Magazine's ScienceNow, CBS Space News, USA Today, The Albuquerque 
> Journal, Scientific American Web Weekly, The Why Files, Discover 
> Magazine, Scientific American, Smithsonian Magazine, and the Technology 
> Review.  The news pages also list links to news sources not compiled 
> within the News site.  We are currently working on adding a number of 
> other sources to the site to make it even more useful.
> 
> To make getting science news even easier, we send out a DAILY NEWS 
> EMAILER listing the articles which have been compiled on our site.  
> Anyone can subscribe to the Emailer by sending an email to 
> news@scienceguide.com with the message "Subscribe"
> 
> 
> DIRECTORY OF USENET NEWS GROUPS and DISCUSSION LISTS
> 
> The Directory of Usenet and Discussion Groups is compiled quarterly from 
> different sources around the net to provide the scientist and those 
> interested in science easy access to these invaluable sources of 
> discourse and information.  We are currently working on finding the 
> proper subscription method for each of the discussion lists.  This is 
> taking a bit longer that we thought so please pardon our dust.  The 
> Usenet portions of this section are complete.
> 
> 
> ON-LINE JOURNAL HYPERLINK SECTION
> 
> The Journals Section contains links to peer reviewed scientific journals 
> on the Internet.  Each listing clearly indicates whether the journal 
> provides only the table of contents, TOC with abstracts, or the full text

> of the journal
> 
> 
> EMPLOYMENT SECTION
> 
> The Jobs and Positions Section contains hyperlinks to the best Scientific

> Employment Databases and Classifieds on the net.
> 
> 
> GRANTS and FUNDING SECTION
> 
> The funding section contains links to the best funding and grant 
> databases on the Internet, making it very easy for scientists to quickly 
> find funding opportunities.  The featured site of the section is "The 
> Community of Science," a Johns Hopkins service designed to help 
> scientists find and continue funding.

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Sun Apr 13 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!ODYSSEE.NET!dellaire
From: dellaire@ODYSSEE.NET ("Graham Dellaire")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: New on EMJL for March and April '97 (JOBS IN BIOLOGY/BIOMEDICINE)
Date: 14 Apr 1997 16:29:24 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 90
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <97Apr14.192947-0400_edt.585994-8565+4252@skywalker.microtec.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS POST DIRECTLY BUT PLEASE VISIT 
THE EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE JOB LISTING (EMJL) at:
http://www.medcor.mcgill.ca/EXPMED/DOCS/jobs.html
===================================================

New on EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE JOB LISTING (EMJL)

The following are some of new the postings we have received in March and
April:

Canada

1.Ph.D. Molecular mechanisms regulating the activity and substrate
specificity of
cholinephosphotransferase and lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase
	-in the laboratory of Dr. Christopher R. McMaster
(Dalhousie Univeristy, Halifax, Nova Scotia)

http://www.medcor.mcgill.ca/EXPMED/DOCS/jobs.html#ATL

2.Post-doctoral Position in therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment
using protein toxins
	- in the Laboratory of Dr. Jean Gariepy at the University of Toronto
(Toronto, Ontario)

http://www.medcor.mcgill.ca/EXPMED/DOCS/jobs.html#ONT

United States

3.Post-doc to study a novel family of murine homeobox genes that are
involved in embryonic development of the mesoderm and nervous system
	- in the laboratory of Dr. Thomas Lufkin (Brookdale Center for Molecular
Biology, New York, New York) 

4. Two Post-doc positions (studies beta globin LCR and Tal1 protein)
	-in the laboratory of Dr. Emery Bresnick (University of Wisconsin-Madison)


http://www.medcor.mcgill.ca/EXPMED/DOCS/jobs.html#US

EUROPE:

Germany

5.Ph.D. Student Position, Multidrug Resistance in Human Tumors
	- in the laboratory of Dr. Ulrike Stein at the Max-Delbrueck-Center for
Molecular Medicine (Berlin, Germany) Available Immediately 

Neatherlands

6.Post-doc to study effects of nuclear/chromatin structure on transcription
of the globin locus
	-in the laboratory of Dr. Peter Fraser (Erasmus University, Rotterdam)

http://www.medcor.mcgill.ca/EXPMED/DOCS/jobs.html#EURO

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please Visit the EMJL Web Page to apply, do not reply to this post
directly.
http://www.medcor.mcgill.ca/EXPMED/DOCS/jobs.html

All e-mail received by Graham Dellaire at dellaire@odyssee.net
will be deleted without comment.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
=====================================
| Graham Dellaire                    
|				   
| Division of Experimental Medicine  
| Dept of Medicine, McGill University
|(http://www.medcor.mcgill.ca/EXPMED/expmed.html)                          
       
| 
| e-mail: dellaire@odyssee.net        
| Fax: (514) 896 4689               
| Vox: (514) 281 6000 ext. 6936
| 
| Bionet: bionet.molbio.recombination
|         bionet.genome.gene-structure                  
=====================================
| Snail Mail:                         
| Institut du Cancer de Montreal   
| Centre de Recherch L.C. Simard     
| 1560 Sherbrooke St. East         
| Montreal, Quebec, CANADA           
| H2L 4M1                               
=====================================





From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Sun Apr 13 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!daresbury!not-for-mail
From: "Nanda Somarajan" <somarank@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Ethics of Genetic Engineering
Date: 14 Apr 1997 01:13:05 +0100
Lines: 28
Sender: lpddist@mserv1.dl.ac.uk
Distribution: bionet
Message-ID: <5irsqh$4e6@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
X-Originating-IP: [165.134.21.21]
Original-To: molmodel@net.bio.net


        Hi.  I have to write a 10 page paper in English and I have 
decided to do it on the Ethics of Genetic Engineering.  Can anyone give me any 
sources that I can find information on this topic?  
         
           I am first telling what genetic engineering is and then I tell the 
consequences of it-such as genetic discrimination due to having a gene for a 
certain disease and human cloning.  I also talk about the human genome project 
and genetic recombination.  I also want to talk about the possibility of someone 
genetically creating a deadly virus to kill people.
      
           Any sources of information on any of the topics I talked about above 
would be help-including how it works, the consequences, what organisms are used 
to transfer the genes-would be helpful. Sources such as journals, books, 
Internet...would be helpful.  Can you please just e-mail me your reply please 
instead of just posting in on the newsgroup.  Thank you very, very much.

**********************************************************************
Nanda Somarajan
somarank@slu.edu
somarank@hotmail.com
Ebola Information Headquarters:   http://www.angelfire.com/ok/nanda
**********************************************************************


---------------------------------------------------------
Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Tue Apr 15 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov!cpk-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in3.uu.net!140.142.64.3!news.u.washington.edu!pogo!evolution
From: Mark Mozden <72012.1130@CompuServe.COM>
Newsgroups: bionet.general,bionet.molbio.recombination,sci.bio.technology
Subject: A writer's questions
Date: 12 Apr 1997 16:03:27 GMT
Organization: CompuServe, Inc. (1-800-689-0736)
Lines: 14
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <5iobof$csk$1@mhade.production.compuserve.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pogo.cqs.washington.edu
Status: RO
Originator: evolution@pogo
Xref: biosci bionet.general:26454 bionet.molbio.recombination:407 sci.bio.technology:7745

	Hi, I'm a techno-y writer with the following questions for any kind
hearted soul-in-the-know in this busy medium:
1) What is the approximate DNA similarity between a human and a rat?
All I need is a rough estimate...
2) Is there a new/better truth serum beyond Thiopental?
3) Can you name a good coffee shop in Cambridge where scientist 
types are likely to hang out and get wired?

	Post note, or preferably email me direct at:
72012.1130@Compuserve.Com
	I thank you for any questions you can answer, and I appreciate your
time.
	-Mark Mozden


From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Tue Apr 15 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!agate!howland.erols.net!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!jussieu.fr!rallye.ijm.jussieu.fr!user
From: matic@saphir.ijm.jussieu.fr. (ivan matic)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: natural transformation of E. coli
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 14:00:58 +0100
Organization: ijm
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <matic-1604971400580001@rallye.ijm.jussieu.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rallye.ijm.jussieu.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

E. coli has been considered as naturally non-transformable microorganism.
However, recently (Applied and Environ. Microbiol. 1996 vol. 62 page
3673-78) the transformation of E. coli in freshwahter has been reported. 
Does anybody know for some other studies concerning natural
transformability of E. coli or S. typhimurium. I am particulary interested
of the reports on transformation in vivo. Thank you in advance!!!

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Tue Apr 15 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!daresbury!uninett.no!hermod.uio.no!nntp.uio.no!newsfeeds.sol.net!feed1.news.erols.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!EU.net!newsfeed.Austria.EU.net!newscore.univie.ac.at!news-ge.switch.ch!feed2.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!alpha.luc.ac.be!pstn10.luc.ac.be!user
From: ghermans@luc.ac.be (Guy Hermans)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: pTRACER stability without T antigen??
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 18:18:21 +0100
Organization: Dr. L. Willems-Instituut
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <ghermans-1604971818210001@pstn10.luc.ac.be>
Reply-To: hellings@luc.ac.be
NNTP-Posting-Host: pstn10.luc.ac.be


I'm considering of using the new pTRACER vectors of Invitrogen. It are
vectors with an SV40 ori and as tracer GFP. I'm planning of using them to
express a gene in lymphocytes. 

My questions:

1. Is it possible to use this vector in transfections of T lymphocytes?
They don't have the large T antigen, and I wondered if the T antigen is a
necessary factor? It doesn't say anything in the folder I got. What will
theoretically happen with the SV40 plasmid vector? Will it replicate
together with the cells?  It is possible to select for an antibiotic.

2. Does anyone have experience with this at all?


Thanks for the help
niels hellings
-- 
  Niels Hellings, PhD student
  Ms research Unit              Immunology research group
  Dr. L. Willems-Institute      Dept. of Physiology, LUC
  University Campus             University Campus
  B-3590 Diepenbeek             B-3590 Diepenbeek
  Belgium                       Belgium
Voice  ++32(0)11/26.92.07
Fax    ++32(0)11/26.92.09

-- 
Niels

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Tue Apr 15 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!ODYSSEE.NET!dellaire
From: dellaire@ODYSSEE.NET (Graham Dellaire)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: RE:pTRACER stability without T antigen??
Date: 16 Apr 1997 16:56:53 -0700
Organization: McGill Div. of Experimental Medicine
Lines: 31
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <335566A7.3256@odyssee.net>
Reply-To: dellaire@odyssee.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hello Niels,

Without the T-antigen these cells won't replicate efficiently.

What will happen is that the vector will be maintained
extrachromosomally for perhaps 48 to 72 hours and then will be lost as
each generation of cells dilutes out the original amount of plasmid DNA
(i.e. each time a cell divides each daughter gets half the total
molecules -theoretically-).  This is fine for quick transient studies of
gene expression or for coimmunoprecipitation etc.

YOu can have stable transfection but this involves integration of the
vector illegitimately after a break in the plasmid.  This may occur at a
frequency of anywhere between 10-3 to 10-4 per cell transfected
(depending on the recombinogenicity of your cell line... murine LTA
fibroblasts for instance are very recombinogenic). 

Any stable clones will be due to integrated plasmid and not
extrachromosomal plasmid.

IF you are transfecting lymphocytes you should probably use lipofectin
or some other lipid or cationic carrier.  Electroporation also works but
you will kill many cells, so if your cells are hard to come by use
lipofectin.


Regards,

Graham Dellaire
McGill Div. of Exp. Medicine
dellaire@odyssee.net

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Thu Apr 17 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!internet!biosci!not-for-mail
From: biohelp (BIOSCI Administrator)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: BIOSCI/bionet miniFAQ & Fundraiser
Date: 18 Apr 1997 02:00:24 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 239
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199704180900.CAA16455@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

(LAST REVISION: 30-JUL-95)

This BIOSCI "miniFAQ" is designed to answer the questions that come up
the *most frequently*.  The main BIOSCI FAQ (Frequently Asked
Questions) is accessible on the World Wide Web at URL
http://www.bio.net/.

If you can not find an answer to your question in this or other
documentation, the BIOSCI technical support staff answers e-mail
queries sent to

		       biosci-help@net.bio.net

We can only answer questions about the use of the newsgroups and
mailing lists.  We unfortunately do not have the staff to do Internet
information searches or answer scientific questions.  Please post
those to the appropriate BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.


	Contents:
	--------
	0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!

	1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.

	2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.

	3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.

	4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.


0) BIOSCI NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!!
------------------------------
BIOSCI's government funding has been expended, and we are now
operating solely from advertising revenue that we have raised from our
Web site at http://www.bio.net/.  We need just a few minutes of your
time to help us serve you.

You can do two important things which will take very little time for
you individually and will immensely help us continue to help you.

First, please use our WWW system at http://www.bio.net/ to access the
archives.  You can post or reply to messages via your Web browser as
described in item #1 below.  Your usage helps attract sponsors. If you
contact any of our sponsors, please be sure to thank them for
supporting BIOSCI. It is critical for them to get this feedback if
they are to continue their sponsorship for the long term.

Second, if you work for a company or organization that provides
products or services of interest to the biology community, please pass
this message on to your marketing or marketing communications
department or other appropriate group.  Please ask them to help
support BIOSCI by sponsoring our Web site and explain the uses and
benefits of the system to the biology community. If they are
interested, they can then contact us for further information at our
tech support address, biosci-help@net.bio.net.


1) Using the WWW to access the BIOSCI/bionet newsgroups.
--------------------------------------------------------
As of 10 December 1995, all BIOSCI/bionet full newsgroups are
accessible through the World Wide Web (WWW) at URL http://www.bio.net.
One can read and reply publicly or privately to both recent postings
and archived messages through one's Web browser if it is configured
properly to send e-mail.  Each newsgroup is equipped with its own WAIS
index.  The main BIOSCI home page also has access to the BIO-JOURNALS
Table of Contents database WAIS index and the BIOSCI user address
database described in another item further below.


2) What to do about "spams," i.e., junk mail, ads, etc.
-------------------------------------------------------
BIOSCI is a set of parallel USENET newsgroups (the "bionet" groups),
mailing lists, and a hypermail archive at URL http://www.bio.net/.
The same postings are distributed on all media (except for a small
number of mailing-list-only groups at net.bio.net).  Unfortunately it
is becoming a despicable practice on the Internet (by a few people out
to make a fast buck) to do automated mass postings to thousands of
newsgroups and mailing lists.  These attempts to grab free advertising
are refered to as "spams" in the usual, somewhat boneheaded, net
terminology.  USENET is more susceptible to this practice, and many
spams originate on the USENET groups and then are passed on to the
mailing lists.  However, spammers also get lists of mailing addresses
and hit these too, so neither medium is immune.

What should you do personally if you get junk mail?
---------------------------------------------------
Just delete it and move on without reading it further.  Filing a
protest is becoming increasingly useless because spammers are often
disguising the addresses where the messages are sent from.  Unless you
really understand Internet mail systems, your attempt at protest by
sending replies to the message will often end up being sent to the
address of an innocent person that the spammer is victimizing.

What can BIOSCI/bionet do to protect its newsgroups?
----------------------------------------------------
The only solution currently available is to moderate the newsgroup.
If this newsgroup is already moderated, then you are in good shape.
Moderation protects the USENET distribution from about 95% of the
spams that are being sent to date and protects the mailing lists
completely.  Moderation means, however, that someone has to take the
time to review each message before it goes out.  We have set up
software here that simply allows the moderator to forward to an
address at net.bio.net messages that (s)he wishes to have distributed.
This takes no more time than that needed to read the message and pass
it on, say about 1 min. per message.

Most newsgroups currently have a discussion leader who is responsible
for their newsgroup.  The discussions leaders and their e-mail
addresses are listed in the BIOSCI Information Sheet which is
available on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  If a newsgroup is being
hit with too many junk postings, please contact the discussion leader
for that group and see if there is interest in moderating the group.
Please do not assume that by simply posting a complaint to the
newsgroup itself, anyone on the BIOSCI staff will act on your
complaint.  With close to 100 newsgroups to run, the BIOSCI staff has
to rely on the discussion leaders of each newsgroup to report problems
directly to us at biosci-help@net.bio.net.

We will moderate any of our newsgroups if the discussion leader tells
us that the readership of the group wishes to do so and if a moderator
is willing to do the work.  For most BIOSCI/bionet groups, this
entails only a few minutes of work each day.

Moderating a newsgroup will resolve probably 95% of the junk postings
on the USENET distribution.  Unfortunately there are easy ways for
determined spammers to override the moderation mechanism on USENET,
but we can protect our e-mail subscribers from unwanted postings if
the newsgroup is moderated.  You can also access our newsgroups over
the WWW at URL http://www.bio.net.  While this Web interface will not
stop spammers from trying to post to the groups, this will give you
yet another way, besides using USENET news, to keep the junk out of
your personal mail files.  For those of you with local USENET news
systems, the Web interface will also give you faster access to new
newsgroups and recent postings.


3) Examples of subscribing and unsubscribing to the mailing lists.
------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE NOTE: The BIOSCI management does NOT act on
subscription/unsubscription requests that are posted improperly to the
newsgroups and mailing lists.  People who do this only bother everyone
on the lists to no avail.  Please be sure to follow the proper
procedures below.

Gory details are in the BIOSCI Information sheets on the Web at
http://www.bio.net.  Below we give an example utilizing the
METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list at both of our two BIOSCI sites:

Users in the Americas and Pacific Rim countries who use the BIOSCI
------------------------------------------------------------------
node at computer net.bio.net:
----------------------------

A) Determine the "listname" which is the <=8 character mail address
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   for the group.  These can be found in the BIOSCI Info. Sheet.  For
   the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS group the mailing address is
   methods@net.bio.net.  The listname is the portion of the address to
   the left of the @ sign, i.e., "methods".  The listname is used with
   the "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" commands illustrated below.

B) Mail all commands in the body of a mail message addressed to
   biosci-server@net.bio.net.  Do NOT send commands to the newsgroup
   posting addresses!  Leave the Subject: line blank, any text on it
   will be ignored.

C) In the body of your message put one or more of the following
   commands with an "end" command on the last line, e.g.,

   subscribe methods
   unsubscribe methods
   end

   Do NOT put your e-mail address or other text on these lines.  The
   server only allows you to cancel your subscription if the address
   on your mail header matches the address on our mailing list.
   Please ask for help at biosci-help@net.bio.net if your address has
   changed, e.g., if you know you are on the list but the server tells
   you that you are not a member.


Users in Europe, Africa, and Central Asia who use the BIOSCI node at
--------------------------------------------------------------------
computer daresbury.ac.uk (also known as dl.ac.uk):
-------------------------------------------------

To subscribe and unsubscribe to/from the BIOSCI lists, you need to
specify the full USENET newsgroup name with "bionet-news." prepended.
The USENET newsgroup names are listed in the BIOSCI Information sheet
on the Web at http://www.bio.net/.  For the METHODS-AND-REAGENTS list
the USENET newsgroup name is bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts, thus the
appropriate commands are

    sub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

    unsub bionet-news.bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts

These commands are included in a message addressed to mxt@dl.ac.uk,
NOT to the newsgroup mailing addresses.  As usual, include the text in
the body of the message as text on the Subject: line is ignored.

To unsubscribe from all the lists at the UK node, use

    unsub bionet-news

Please note that if the address in the list is different than the one
in your mail message header, you will not be able to unsubscribe by
this method. If you have problems, please mail biosci@daresbury.ac.uk.


4) The BIOSCI user address and research interest directory.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Please take this opportunity to add your name, address, and research
interest information to the BIOSCI User Address Database if you have
not already done so.

You can fill out the address form directly through our Web page at URL
http://www.bio.net/adrform.html.

The address database is reindexed nightly for WWW access (the URL is
http://www.bio.net/).  If you are not directly on the Internet but can
reach it by e-mail, please use our waismail server to access the user
directory.  waismail use is described above.  You can also request a
user address form by e-mail from biosci-help@net.bio.net.

Please check your database entry from time-to-time to see if your
address information is still up-to-date.  Because of our limited
personnel resources, we ask that you resubmit a *complete* form to
revise your entry; we only replace complete entries and do not have
resources to edit old forms.

				Sincerely,

				Dave Kristofferson
				BIOSCI/bionet Manager

				biosci-help@net.bio.net

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Mon Apr 21 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!ims.unich.it!"masulli"
From: "masulli"@ims.unich.it (masulli michele)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: suicide vectors
Date: 22 Apr 1997 02:07:12 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 2
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <9704220906.AA24658@phobos.unich.it>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

I looking for suicide vector for Proteus mirabilis. any information are 
welcome. nerino allocati

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Mon Apr 21 23:00:00 1997
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Path: biosci!fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov!cpk-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!uknet!bcc.ac.uk!news
From: Paul Wells <p.wells@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: PRACTICAL COURSE IN GENETIC ENGINEERING
Message-ID: <1997Apr22.133528.86267@ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 13:35:28 GMT
Organization: University College London
Lines: 35

A one week practical course designed to teach the basic
techniques in genetic engineering will be held from
16th-20th June 1997 at the Dept. of Biochemistry and 
Molecular Biology University College London. 

A "hands on" approach will enable scientists from
higher education and industry, clinicians and research
workers who have had no practical experience of recombinant
DNA technology to set up such techniques in their own
laboratories.

Techniques to be covered will include, Southern hybridisation
DNA sequencing, PCR, and analysis of cloned DNA using enzyme
restriction mapping. Supplemented with some lectures. 

Course fee 900 pounds sterling (750 for full time postgraduate
students) exclusive of accommodation.

Bed and breakfast accommodation for the period of the course
can be provided in a local hall of residence for 102 pounds
sterling from Sunday 15th June until Saturday 21st June.

For further information visit our web site
"http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/~wells/pige97.htm
Write for application forms to:
Dr. John Ward
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
University College London
Gower Street
London WC1E 6BT
Fax: 0171 380 7193

Or e-mail either:-
j.ward@biochem.ucl.ac.uk
p.wells@ucl.ac.uk


From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Wed Apr 23 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!OSPREY.UNF.EDU!jander
From: jander@OSPREY.UNF.EDU ("John E. Anderson")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: location of crossovers with respect to coding sequences
Date: 23 Apr 1997 22:40:18 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 26
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <335EF246.442F@osprey.unf.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hi

I am teaching a course in general biology, and in the section on
evolution, I'm puzzled by the statement in at least two textbooks that
sexual recombination, i.e. meiotic crossover, can't generate new
alleles.  If one of the two alleles of a gene carries a mutation near
the 5' end of the coding sequence, and the other carries a mutation near
the 3' end, then crossover between the two mutations would generate two
new alleles, one with both mutations and one with neither:

5'---*----------3'                  5'---*------*---3'
        X                --->       
5'----------*---3'                  5'--------------3'

Is there something wrong with my thinking here?

Please respond by email as well as to the list, as I don't read this
list regularly.

Thanks a lot for your help.

John Anderson
--
John E. Anderson
jander@unf.edu


From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Thu Apr 24 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!daresbury!uninett.no!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!sprint!uunet!in1.uu.net!136.142.185.26!newsfeed.pitt.edu!newsflash.concordia.ca!news.mcgill.ca!news
From: Terry Chow <mdty@musica.mcgill.ca>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re: location of crossovers with respect to coding sequences
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 12:56:43 -0400
Organization: McGill University Computing Centre
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <3360E24B.3106@musica.mcgill.ca>
References: <335EF246.442F@osprey.unf.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.168.147.137
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
To: "John E. Anderson" <jander@OSPREY.UNF.EDU>

John E. Anderson wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> I am teaching a course in general biology, and in the section on
> evolution, I'm puzzled by the statement in at least two textbooks that
> sexual recombination, i.e. meiotic crossover, can't generate new
> alleles.  If one of the two alleles of a gene carries a mutation near
> the 5' end of the coding sequence, and the other carries a mutation near
> the 3' end, then crossover between the two mutations would generate two
> new alleles, one with both mutations and one with neither:
> 
> 5'---*----------3'                  5'---*------*---3'
>         X                --->
> 5'----------*---3'                  5'--------------3'
> 
> Is there something wrong with my thinking here?
> 
> Please respond by email as well as to the list, as I don't read this
> list regularly.
> 
> Thanks a lot for your help.
> 
> John Anderson
> --
> John E. Anderson
> jander@unf.edu


Dear John,

You are partly right.  The event that you described is only rearrange
the existing information.  The alleles of 3' mutation and 5' mutation
are only rearranged.  There is no generation of "new allele" as if
mutation event has occurred.  What the textbook mean is that
recombination in general is not mutagenic.  It does not generate "new
thing" but only rearrange existing one.  I hope this explanation will
help.

Terry Chow

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Sat Apr 26 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!ODYSSEE.NET!dellaire
From: dellaire@ODYSSEE.NET (Graham Dellaire)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re: location of crossovers with respect to coding sequences
Date: 27 Apr 1997 09:22:12 -0700
Organization: McGill Div. of Experimental Medicine
Lines: 32
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <33637C71.3898@odyssee.net>
Reply-To: dellaire@odyssee.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hello John and Terry,

YOu wrote:
"I'm puzzled by the statement in at least two textbooks that
sexual recombination, i.e. meiotic crossover, can't generate new
alleles."

and Terry responded:

"What the textbook mean is that recombination in general is not
mutagenic. It does not generate "new thing" but only rearrange existing
one."

I agree with what Terry said but I would add a qualifier: "gene
conversion and equal X-over", found during mieotic recombination, are
usually not mutagenic.  So the text book is probably referring to normal
equal X-over, and gene conversion occuring during mieosis between two
reciprocal alleles.

You are very right to assume recombination  can be mutagenic.  The
repair of DNA damage by recombination in the germline fixes mutations
and is one possible mechanism, of many, of evolution.

Illegitimate recombination can very easily disrupt an allele or create a
hybrid one(ex. translocation event leading to the Philadelphia
chromosome in chronic mylogenous leukemia (CML) which creates a new
oncogene by combining bcr and the tyrosine kinase abl). 


Graham Dellaire

dellaire@odyssee.net

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Sun Apr 27 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov!cpk-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!uunet!in2.uu.net!132.205.106.4!newsflash.concordia.ca!news.mcgill.ca!news
From: Terry Chow <mdty@musica.mcgill.ca>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re: location of crossovers with respect to coding sequences
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 10:33:16 -0400
Organization: McGill University Computing Centre
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <3364B52B.3922@musica.mcgill.ca>
References: <33637C71.3898@odyssee.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.168.147.137
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)

Graham Dellaire wrote:
> 
> Hello John and Terry,
> 
> YOu wrote:
> "I'm puzzled by the statement in at least two textbooks that
> sexual recombination, i.e. meiotic crossover, can't generate new
> alleles."
> 
> and Terry responded:
> 
> "What the textbook mean is that recombination in general is not
> mutagenic. It does not generate "new thing" but only rearrange existing
> one."
> 
> I agree with what Terry said but I would add a qualifier: "gene
> conversion and equal X-over", found during mieotic recombination, are
> usually not mutagenic.  So the text book is probably referring to normal
> equal X-over, and gene conversion occuring during mieosis between two
> reciprocal alleles.
> 
> You are very right to assume recombination  can be mutagenic.  The
> repair of DNA damage by recombination in the germline fixes mutations
> and is one possible mechanism, of many, of evolution.
> 
> Illegitimate recombination can very easily disrupt an allele or create a
> hybrid one(ex. translocation event leading to the Philadelphia
> chromosome in chronic mylogenous leukemia (CML) which creates a new
> oncogene by combining bcr and the tyrosine kinase abl).
> 
> Graham Dellaire
> 
> dellaire@odyssee.net


Hello Graham,

If you get into illegitimate recombination, then there will be almost
infinite potential of generating different alleles.  But, however,
almost all the mieotic recombination are normal homologous type of
events.  If I use the example that John posted, then we are dealing with
three alleles.  The normal, wild-type alleles, the 3' mutated alleles,
and the 5' mutated alleles.  If we consider only the each of the alleles
in the gene, there is no generation of new allele but only rearrange of
the existing one; although in one case, the 3' mutated allele and the 5'
mutated allele is in the same chromosome.  Mutations generate by
recombination events (including illegitimate recombination) are rare.

Terry Chow
mdty@musica.mcgill.ca

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Sun Apr 27 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!OSPREY.UNF.EDU!jander
From: jander@OSPREY.UNF.EDU ("John E. Anderson")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: location of crossovers with respect to coding sequences
Date: 28 Apr 1997 09:13:49 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 45
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3364CB14.6E38@osprey.unf.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

This is a summary of responses and followup to the query I made to the
list last week, which is reproduced here:

> I am teaching a course in general biology, and in the section on
> evolution, I'm puzzled by the statement in at least two textbooks that
> sexual recombination, i.e. meiotic crossover, can't generate new
> alleles.  If one of the two alleles of a gene carries a mutation near
> the 5' end of the coding sequence, and the other carries a mutation near
> the 3' end, then crossover between the two mutations would generate two
> new alleles, one with both mutations and one with neither:
> 
> 5'---*----------3'                  5'---*------*---3'
>         X                --->
> 5'----------*---3'                  5'--------------3'
> 
> Is there something wrong with my thinking here?

Of the four individuals who responded to me by email (whom I thank for
their responses), two said that I am right, that recombination does
occur within coding sequences and can produce new alleles.  The other
two said that I am partly right, that recombination such as I've
indicated above would generate new alleles, but that these are not
strictly speaking *new* because they just make a new combination of two
already-existing mutations.  I know what this argument is getting at,
but I think that the two new alleles produced by the recombination I
pictured above might very well produce products with very different
properties than the original alleles.  In that case, the two new alleles
would be *functionally different* from the original two, and because of
that, could contribute to the evolution of the population.

Let me refine the original query a bit, though.  What I intended to ask
(which didn't come out in the post) was whether there is an observed
tendency for crossovers to occur outside coding sequences, over and
above what you might expect from the relative amount of coding versus
non-coding DNA.  For instance, is there a particular DNA sequence,
perhaps in promoter regions, where recombination preferentially occurs?

Again, please respond by email, and thanks for your help.

John Anderson
--
John E. Anderson
jander@unf.edu



From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Sun Apr 27 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!OSPREY.UNF.EDU!jander
From: jander@OSPREY.UNF.EDU ("John E. Anderson")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re: location of crossovers with respect to coding sequences
Date: 28 Apr 1997 16:34:04 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 82
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <336532D5.2C7D@osprey.unf.edu>
References: <3364B52B.3922@musica.mcgill.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hi folks

I've subscribed to the email list so I can follow this thread.

Terry Chow wrote:
> 
> Graham Dellaire wrote:
> >
> > Hello John and Terry,
> >
> > YOu wrote:
> > "I'm puzzled by the statement in at least two textbooks that
> > sexual recombination, i.e. meiotic crossover, can't generate new
> > alleles."
> >
> > and Terry responded:
> >
> > "What the textbook mean is that recombination in general is not
> > mutagenic. It does not generate "new thing" but only rearrange existing
> > one."
> >
> > I agree with what Terry said but I would add a qualifier: "gene
> > conversion and equal X-over", found during mieotic recombination, are
> > usually not mutagenic.  So the text book is probably referring to normal
> > equal X-over, and gene conversion occuring during mieosis between two
> > reciprocal alleles.
> >
> > You are very right to assume recombination  can be mutagenic.  The
> > repair of DNA damage by recombination in the germline fixes mutations
> > and is one possible mechanism, of many, of evolution.
> >
> > Illegitimate recombination can very easily disrupt an allele or create a
> > hybrid one(ex. translocation event leading to the Philadelphia
> > chromosome in chronic mylogenous leukemia (CML) which creates a new
> > oncogene by combining bcr and the tyrosine kinase abl).
> >
> > Graham Dellaire
> >
> > dellaire@odyssee.net
> 
> Hello Graham,
> 
> If you get into illegitimate recombination, then there will be almost
> infinite potential of generating different alleles.  But, however,
> almost all the mieotic recombination are normal homologous type of
> events.  If I use the example that John posted, then we are dealing with
> three alleles.  The normal, wild-type alleles, the 3' mutated alleles,
> and the 5' mutated alleles.  If we consider only the each of the alleles
> in the gene, there is no generation of new allele but only rearrange of
> the existing one; although in one case, the 3' mutated allele and the 5'
> mutated allele is in the same chromosome.  Mutations generate by
> recombination events (including illegitimate recombination) are rare.
> 
> Terry Chow
> mdty@musica.mcgill.ca

It looks like Terry considers the "allele" to be the base-pair change...
sorry, if I'm wrong.  I thought the allele was the entire gene, in which
case the 3'/5' mutant in my example would be a new allele by virtue of
having both mutations in the same gene.  (It occurs to me as I'm writing
this that maybe I wasn't clear that both mutations are supposed to be in
the same gene...) In any case, I think that in the context of evolution,
a "different allele" is a gene that specifies a gene product with a
different function, which would affect a trait in such a way as to
affect the fitness of the organism.  The 3'/5' mutated gene product in
my example could easily have a very different function than either of
the parent gene products.  Both of the parent alleles could be
nonfunctional, for example, but the amino acid changes might compensate
for each other in the 3'/5' mutant, so that the 3'/5' mutant protein
structure would be functional.  Or both of the single mutants might have
partial function, and the double mutant be completely inactive.  Or any
of a number of other possibilities. So while the base pair changes in
the 3'/5' mutant might not be novel, the mutant gene in which they both
occur might have a product with a novel function, which would, at least
by my functional definition, be a new allele in the population's gene
pool.

John
--
John E. Anderson
jander@unf.edu


From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Mon Apr 28 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!GPU.SRV.UALBERTA.CA!hastings
From: hastings@GPU.SRV.UALBERTA.CA (P Hastings)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re: location of crossovers with respect to coding sequences
Date: 29 Apr 1997 07:39:58 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 106
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.93.970429082402.46656A-100000@gpu4.srv.ualberta.ca>
References: <336532D5.2C7D@osprey.unf.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

On 28 Apr 1997, John E. Anderson wrote:

> Hi folks
> 
> I've subscribed to the email list so I can follow this thread.
> 
> Terry Chow wrote:
> > 
> > Graham Dellaire wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello John and Terry,
> > >
> > > YOu wrote:
> > > "I'm puzzled by the statement in at least two textbooks that
> > > sexual recombination, i.e. meiotic crossover, can't generate new
> > > alleles."
> > >
> > > and Terry responded:
> > >
> > > "What the textbook mean is that recombination in general is not
> > > mutagenic. It does not generate "new thing" but only rearrange existing
> > > one."
> > >
> > > I agree with what Terry said but I would add a qualifier: "gene
> > > conversion and equal X-over", found during mieotic recombination, are
> > > usually not mutagenic.  So the text book is probably referring to normal
> > > equal X-over, and gene conversion occuring during mieosis between two
> > > reciprocal alleles.
> > >
> > > You are very right to assume recombination  can be mutagenic.  The
> > > repair of DNA damage by recombination in the germline fixes mutations
> > > and is one possible mechanism, of many, of evolution.
> > >
> > > Illegitimate recombination can very easily disrupt an allele or create a
> > > hybrid one(ex. translocation event leading to the Philadelphia
> > > chromosome in chronic mylogenous leukemia (CML) which creates a new
> > > oncogene by combining bcr and the tyrosine kinase abl).
> > >
> > > Graham Dellaire
> > >
> > > dellaire@odyssee.net
> > 
> > Hello Graham,
> > 
> > If you get into illegitimate recombination, then there will be almost
> > infinite potential of generating different alleles.  But, however,
> > almost all the mieotic recombination are normal homologous type of
> > events.  If I use the example that John posted, then we are dealing with
> > three alleles.  The normal, wild-type alleles, the 3' mutated alleles,
> > and the 5' mutated alleles.  If we consider only the each of the alleles
> > in the gene, there is no generation of new allele but only rearrange of
> > the existing one; although in one case, the 3' mutated allele and the 5'
> > mutated allele is in the same chromosome.  Mutations generate by
> > recombination events (including illegitimate recombination) are rare.
> > 
> > Terry Chow
> > mdty@musica.mcgill.ca
> 
> It looks like Terry considers the "allele" to be the base-pair change...
> sorry, if I'm wrong.  I thought the allele was the entire gene, in which
> case the 3'/5' mutant in my example would be a new allele by virtue of
> having both mutations in the same gene.  (It occurs to me as I'm writing
> this that maybe I wasn't clear that both mutations are supposed to be in
> the same gene...) In any case, I think that in the context of evolution,
> a "different allele" is a gene that specifies a gene product with a
> different function, which would affect a trait in such a way as to
> affect the fitness of the organism.  The 3'/5' mutated gene product in
> my example could easily have a very different function than either of
> the parent gene products.  Both of the parent alleles could be
> nonfunctional, for example, but the amino acid changes might compensate
> for each other in the 3'/5' mutant, so that the 3'/5' mutant protein
> structure would be functional.  Or both of the single mutants might have
> partial function, and the double mutant be completely inactive.  Or any
> of a number of other possibilities. So while the base pair changes in
> the 3'/5' mutant might not be novel, the mutant gene in which they both
> occur might have a product with a novel function, which would, at least
> by my functional definition, be a new allele in the population's gene
> pool.
> 
> John
> --
> John E. Anderson
> jander@unf.edu
> 
> 
> 
	The original concept of an allelomorph included the idea that
alleles could not be separated by recombination, since the gene was the
unit of recombination.  When it became apparent that mutations of the same
function in more or less the same place could recombine, they were known
for a time as Pseudoalleles.  This was dropped as it become apparent that
different mutions of the same gene are hardly ever in the same place.
This has left us with the problem you point out that a recombination
person means a varient base-pair or so when she says allele, and we have
no word for varient conditions of a gene.  Of course you are right that a
novel gene product can be generated by recombinations of alleles.  This
concept is in the population biology literature.  
	It is improbable that recombination between alleles occurs by
crossing-over.  A crossover occupies a length in which conversion occurs.
Usually, one end of the length is outside the gene where the event is
initiated.  
	recombination is turning out to be much more mutagenic than we had
supposed, but I shall get back to this another time if anyone is
interested. 
	Phil.


From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Mon Apr 28 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!worldnet.att.net!dciteleport.com!usenet.logical.net!news.dal.ca!newsflash.concordia.ca!news.mcgill.ca!news
From: Terry Chow <mdty@musica.mcgill.ca>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re: location of crossovers with respect to coding sequences
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 13:02:21 -0400
Organization: McGill University Computing Centre
Lines: 95
Message-ID: <3366299D.7E8C@musica.mcgill.ca>
References: <3364B52B.3922@musica.mcgill.ca> <336532D5.2C7D@osprey.unf.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.168.147.137
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
To: "John E. Anderson" <jander@OSPREY.UNF.EDU>

John E. Anderson wrote:
> 
> Hi folks
> 
> I've subscribed to the email list so I can follow this thread.
> 
> Terry Chow wrote:
> >
> > Graham Dellaire wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello John and Terry,
> > >
> > > YOu wrote:
> > > "I'm puzzled by the statement in at least two textbooks that
> > > sexual recombination, i.e. meiotic crossover, can't generate new
> > > alleles."
> > >
> > > and Terry responded:
> > >
> > > "What the textbook mean is that recombination in general is not
> > > mutagenic. It does not generate "new thing" but only rearrange existing
> > > one."
> > >
> > > I agree with what Terry said but I would add a qualifier: "gene
> > > conversion and equal X-over", found during mieotic recombination, are
> > > usually not mutagenic.  So the text book is probably referring to normal
> > > equal X-over, and gene conversion occuring during mieosis between two
> > > reciprocal alleles.
> > >
> > > You are very right to assume recombination  can be mutagenic.  The
> > > repair of DNA damage by recombination in the germline fixes mutations
> > > and is one possible mechanism, of many, of evolution.
> > >
> > > Illegitimate recombination can very easily disrupt an allele or create a
> > > hybrid one(ex. translocation event leading to the Philadelphia
> > > chromosome in chronic mylogenous leukemia (CML) which creates a new
> > > oncogene by combining bcr and the tyrosine kinase abl).
> > >
> > > Graham Dellaire
> > >
> > > dellaire@odyssee.net
> >
> > Hello Graham,
> >
> > If you get into illegitimate recombination, then there will be almost
> > infinite potential of generating different alleles.  But, however,
> > almost all the mieotic recombination are normal homologous type of
> > events.  If I use the example that John posted, then we are dealing with
> > three alleles.  The normal, wild-type alleles, the 3' mutated alleles,
> > and the 5' mutated alleles.  If we consider only the each of the alleles
> > in the gene, there is no generation of new allele but only rearrange of
> > the existing one; although in one case, the 3' mutated allele and the 5'
> > mutated allele is in the same chromosome.  Mutations generate by
> > recombination events (including illegitimate recombination) are rare.
> >
> > Terry Chow
> > mdty@musica.mcgill.ca
> 
> It looks like Terry considers the "allele" to be the base-pair change...
> sorry, if I'm wrong.  I thought the allele was the entire gene, in which
> case the 3'/5' mutant in my example would be a new allele by virtue of
> having both mutations in the same gene.  (It occurs to me as I'm writing
> this that maybe I wasn't clear that both mutations are supposed to be in
> the same gene...) In any case, I think that in the context of evolution,
> a "different allele" is a gene that specifies a gene product with a
> different function, which would affect a trait in such a way as to
> affect the fitness of the organism.  The 3'/5' mutated gene product in
> my example could easily have a very different function than either of
> the parent gene products.  Both of the parent alleles could be
> nonfunctional, for example, but the amino acid changes might compensate
> for each other in the 3'/5' mutant, so that the 3'/5' mutant protein
> structure would be functional.  Or both of the single mutants might have
> partial function, and the double mutant be completely inactive.  Or any
> of a number of other possibilities. So while the base pair changes in
> the 3'/5' mutant might not be novel, the mutant gene in which they both
> occur might have a product with a novel function, which would, at least
> by my functional definition, be a new allele in the population's gene
> pool.
> 
> John
> --
> John E. Anderson
> jander@unf.edu


Hi John,

You are right.  By the definition of the classical genetic, it is
different alleles of the same gene.  I just want to point out that, in a
way, the example you cited is in theory of four alleles.  3', 5', 3'-5',
and wild-type.  Meiotic recombination is merely rearrange them and not
generate new one that is different from the four.

Terry Chow
mdty@musica.mcgill.ca

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Tue Apr 29 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!bcm.tmc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!feeder.chicago.cic.net!news.uiowa.edu!news.physics.uiowa.edu!newsrelay.iastate.edu!news.iastate.edu!not-for-mail
From: "Patrick S. Schnable" <schnable@iastate.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re: location of crossovers with respect to coding sequences
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 12:12:55 -0500
Organization: Iowa State University
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <33677CEF.14FB@iastate.edu>
References: <3367431F.6AEC@osprey.unf.edu> <Pine.A32.3.93.970430082213.39506A-100000@gpu2.srv.ualberta.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc2696.agron.iastate.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Macintosh; U; PPC)

> Dear John,
>         No.  I'm sorry I was not more clear.  Our concept of a crossover
> is that it involves substantial lengths  homologous sequences (hundreds
> to thousands of base pairs)  in which heteroduplex is formed and usually
> corrected to give conversion.  The process may also involve some deletion
> and gap filling from the homologue, though this is not clear. The
> resolution of this structure may result in a crossover  i. e. reciprocal
> recombination of flanking sequences.  There is plenty of evidence in
> yeast that, in meiosis,the event begins outside the gene at one end (often
> but not always the promoter end).  Thus one does not expect alleles to be
> recombined by crossing-over.  Tetrad analysis confirms this.
> 
> Phil.

Maybe I misunderstand you, but because the sites at which a crossover
initiates and resolves are separate,  intragenic recombination could
occur even if initiation occurs outside of the gene.  And indeed, we (Xu
et al. 1995 Plant Cell 7:2151-2161) and others have very clear sequence
data that demonstrates that crossing over can  recombine sequence
polymorphisms within alleles.

-- 
Patrick S. Schnable
Associate Professor 
G405 Agronomy
Iowa State University
Ames, IA  50011 USA
515-294-0975 (office)
515-294-2299 (fax)
http://www.public.iastate.edu/~schnable/

From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Tue Apr 29 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!ODYSSEE.NET!dellaire
From: dellaire@ODYSSEE.NET ("Graham Dellaire")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: ON the Issue of Heritable Mutation... Look at this article I found!
Date: 30 Apr 1997 05:46:31 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 85
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <97Apr30.084817-0400_edt.585875-32659+894@skywalker.microtec.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Hello Everyone,

On the subject of heritable mutations, new alleles and such look at the
following paper.  I find it very, very interesting.

In particular this line in the abstract:

"which is responsible for the NF1 phenotype in a
kindred with two children affected because of
germline mosaicism in the unaffected father, who has the mutation in 10% of
his spermatozoa. "

The father is not affected...meaning the mutation is in perhaps a clone of
spermatagonia that had acquired the deletion.  I think 10% would be too
high for spontaneous mutation occuring during gametogenesis.

see the following:


Am J Hum Genet 57 (5): 1044-1049 (1995) 
Molecular characterization of the breakpoints of a 12-kb deletion in the
NF1 gene in a family showing germ-line mosaicism.

Lazaro C, Gaona A, Lynch M, Kruyer H, Ravella A, Estivill X

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is caused by deletions, insertions,
translocations, and point mutations in the NF1 gene, which
spans 350 kb on the long arm of human chromosome 17. Although several point
mutations have been described, large
molecular abnormalities have rarely been characterized in detail. We
describe here the molecular breakpoints of a 12-kb
deletion of the NF1 gene, which is responsible for the NF1 phenotype in a
kindred with two children affected because of
germline mosaicism in the unaffected father, who has the mutation in 10% of
his spermatozoa. The mutation spans introns
31-39, removing 12,021 nt and inserting 30 bp, of which 19 bp are a direct
repetition of a sequence located in intron 31, just
4 bp before the 5' breakpoint. The 5' and 3' breakpoints contain the
sequence TATTTTA, which could be involved in the
generation of the deletion. The most plausible explanation for the
mechanism involved in the generation of this 12-kb deletion is
homologous/nonhomologous recombination. Since sperm of the father does not
contain the corresponding insertion of the
12-kb deleted sequence, this deletion could have occurred within the NF1
chromosome through loop formation. RNA from
lymphocytes of one of the NF1 patients showed similar levels of the mutated
and normal transcripts, suggesting that the
NF1-mRNA from mutations causing frame shifts of the reading frame or stop
codons in this gene is not degraded during its
processing. The mutation was not detected in fresh lymphocytes from the
unaffected father by PCR analysis, supporting the
case for true germ-line mosaicism. 

********************************************************

Cheers,

Graham

=====================================
| Graham Dellaire                    
|				   
| Division of Experimental Medicine  
| Dept of Medicine, McGill University
|(http://www.medcor.mcgill.ca/EXPMED/expmed.html)                          
       
| 
| e-mail: dellaire@odyssee.net        
| Fax: (514) 896 4689               
| Vox: (514) 281 6000 ext. 6936
| 
| Bionet: bionet.molbio.recombination
|         bionet.genome.gene-structure                  
=====================================
| Snail Mail:                         
| Institut du Cancer de Montreal   
| Centre de Recherch L.C. Simard     
| 1560 Sherbrooke St. East         
| Montreal, Quebec, CANADA           
| H2L 4M1                               
=====================================



From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Tue Apr 29 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!GPU.SRV.UALBERTA.CA!hastings
From: hastings@GPU.SRV.UALBERTA.CA (P Hastings)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re: location of crossovers with respect to coding sequences
Date: 30 Apr 1997 07:32:37 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 28
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.93.970430082213.39506A-100000@gpu2.srv.ualberta.ca>
References: <3367431F.6AEC@osprey.unf.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

On 30 Apr 1997, John E. Anderson wrote:

> P Hastings wrote:
> >         It is improbable that recombination between alleles occurs by
> > crossing-over.  A crossover occupies a length in which conversion occurs.
> > Usually, one end of the length is outside the gene where the event is
> > initiated.
> 
> Do you mean that crossing over deletes some of the DNA?
> 
> John
> --
> John E. Anderson
> jander@unf.edu
Dear John,
	No.  I'm sorry I was not more clear.  Our concept of a crossover
is that it involves substantial lengths  homologous sequences (hundreds
to thousands of base pairs)  in which heteroduplex is formed and usually
corrected to give conversion.  The process may also involve some deletion 
and gap filling from the homologue, though this is not clear. The
resolution of this structure may result in a crossover  i. e. reciprocal
recombination of flanking sequences.  There is plenty of evidence in
yeast that, in meiosis,the event begins outside the gene at one end (often
but not always the promoter end).  Thus one does not expect alleles to be
recombined by crossing-over.  Tetrad analysis confirms this.

Phil.   


From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Tue Apr 29 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!OSPREY.UNF.EDU!jander
From: jander@OSPREY.UNF.EDU ("John E. Anderson")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re: location of crossovers with respect to coding sequences
Date: 30 Apr 1997 06:26:53 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 31
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <33674889.60D1@osprey.unf.edu>
References: <3366299D.7E8C@musica.mcgill.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Terry Chow wrote:
>I just want to point out that, in a
> way, the example you cited is in theory of four alleles.  3', 5', 3'-5',
> and wild-type.  Meiotic recombination is merely rearrange them and not
> generate new one that is different from the four.

I agree that the genes having the 3', 5', wt, and 3'-5' mutations are
different alleles.  But while the crossover does merely rearrange the
already-mutated base pairs, in doing so it puts them both on the same
chromosome, a situation that did not exist before, and thereby generates
a new allele of the gene.  

I know this is getting tiresome.  As somebody mentioned, it's really
just a sloppy use of the term allele.  But when discussing the sources
of new alleles in a gene pool in an evolutionary sense, I think allele
means a gene with a different DNA sequence (which may or may not have a
different function).  It is in this sense that the crossover in my
example generates a new allele.  

So I think it is incorrect to say, in a textbook unit on evolution, that
mutation is the only way to generate new alleles.  There are, in fact,
at least three ways: mutation, crossover, and changes in chromosome
structure (deletions, transpositions, inversions, etc).

Thanks to all for helping me figure this out.

John
--
John E. Anderson
jander@unf.edu


From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Tue Apr 29 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!OSPREY.UNF.EDU!jander
From: jander@OSPREY.UNF.EDU ("John E. Anderson")
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re: location of crossovers with respect to coding sequences
Date: 30 Apr 1997 06:26:47 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 14
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3367431F.6AEC@osprey.unf.edu>
References: <Pine.A32.3.93.970429082402.46656A-100000@gpu4.srv.ualberta.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

P Hastings wrote:
>         It is improbable that recombination between alleles occurs by
> crossing-over.  A crossover occupies a length in which conversion occurs.
> Usually, one end of the length is outside the gene where the event is
> initiated.

Do you mean that crossing over deletes some of the DNA?

John
--
John E. Anderson
jander@unf.edu



From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Wed Apr 30 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!GPU.SRV.UALBERTA.CA!hastings
From: hastings@GPU.SRV.UALBERTA.CA (P Hastings)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Re: location of crossovers with respect to coding sequences
Date: 1 May 1997 07:38:03 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 53
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.93.970501082215.18654A-100000@gpu1.srv.ualberta.ca>
References: <33677CEF.14FB@iastate.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Patrick S. Schnable wrote:

> > Dear John,
> >         No.  I'm sorry I was not more clear.  Our concept of a crossover
> > is that it involves substantial lengths  homologous sequences (hundreds
> > to thousands of base pairs)  in which heteroduplex is formed and usually
> > corrected to give conversion.  The process may also involve some deletion
> > and gap filling from the homologue, though this is not clear. The
> > resolution of this structure may result in a crossover  i. e. reciprocal
> > recombination of flanking sequences.  There is plenty of evidence in
> > yeast that, in meiosis,the event begins outside the gene at one end (often
> > but not always the promoter end).  Thus one does not expect alleles to be
> > recombined by crossing-over.  Tetrad analysis confirms this.
> > 
> > Phil.
> 
> Maybe I misunderstand you, but because the sites at which a crossover
> initiates and resolves are separate,  intragenic recombination could
> occur even if initiation occurs outside of the gene.  And indeed, we (Xu
> et al. 1995 Plant Cell 7:2151-2161) and others have very clear sequence
> data that demonstrates that crossing over can  recombine sequence
> polymorphisms within alleles.
> 
> -- 
> Patrick S. Schnable
> Associate Professor 
> G405 Agronomy
> Iowa State University
> Ames, IA  50011 USA
> 515-294-0975 (office)
> 515-294-2299 (fax)
> http://www.public.iastate.edu/~schnable/
> 
Dear Patrick,  I don't know how I got myself into this mess,  But I think
it is all to do with precisely what we mean by various words.  I do not
know your paper in plant cell, but I would be delighted if you sent me a
copy because I have long felt that plant recombination is a neglected
field.  A crossover is, by definition, a reciprocal event.  To demonstrate
a crossover one must therefore recover both products of the same event.
This can be done by tetrad analysis or by the use of attatched
chromosomes.  It can be done in mitosis by the use of twin spots. I expect
that you know all this.  My point is that use of these methods shows that
recombination between alleles is almost always non reciprocal.  We then
say that it occurred by conversion, which is a catch-all term.  Even when
, rarely, one sees a reciprocal intragenic event, one does not really know
that a whole crossover event was included between the allelic markers
because there are various patterns of correction, migration,
back-migration and resolution that can give the sme appearance.  I had
only raised the point because people seemed to be using the terms
"recombination" and "crossover" as though they were synonymous wheras, in
an intragenic situation they are certainly not.   
 Phil Hastings, Biology Dept, U of Alberta, Edmonton.  


