From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Sun May 02 23:00:00 1999
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: art roberts <arthurr@wsunix.wsu.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Great New Website for Molecular Biologists
Date: 3 May 1999 07:59:14 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 31
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Approved: genestructure@yahoo.com
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <7gkdk2$gg6@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

http://biotech.isCool.net
This site allows easy access to hyperlinks and free
software for the
biochemist, biophysicist, and molecular biologist. 
This site is
constantly evolving and expanding, so it can be easy
to use, reliable,
and comprehensive. This is purely a non-profit site
for your enjoyment.


Sincerely,

Art Roberts
 
(web designer)
 
 

===



Moderated
bionet.genome.gene-structure


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


From owner-recombination@net.bio.net Mon May 17 23:00:00 1999
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: "Mr Clive Delmonte" <clived@ndirect.co.uk>
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.recombination
Subject: Recombination Complexes
Date: 18 May 1999 02:49:52 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 119
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Approved: genestructure@yahoo.com
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <7hrd40$7mq@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

May I make a belated, and rather different
contribution to the recent
discussion in bionet newsgroups about the nature and
purpose of "junk" DNA ?
There is the possibility that the purpose of "junk"
DNA is to enable long
lengths of
like-sequence, repetitive DNA to recognise each
other, which could explain
why it is needed in such long lengths.   (I suspect
we might only call it
"junk" DNA because we haven't yet agreed a secure
purpose for it.)

Long lengths of repetitive DNA capable of
recognising the same, or closely
similar, repeat sequences could assist in the
formation of the "30 nm" fibre
of compacted nucleosomes, and in the assembly of
centromeres.

In addition, prior to cell division, the pairing of
like chromosomes could
be facilitated before separation during mitosis or
meiosis, for example.
The 13 pairs of human chromosomes would each need
closely similar repeat
sequences (each with the other), and these would
need to be rather different
from the repeat sequences in the other pairs.  
Perhaps subscribers know the
repeat sequences of all of the human chromosomes ?

The unique pairing of Watson-Crick base pairs, AT
with AT and GC with GC,
was described first by Loewdin in 1963, as far as I
am aware.  These
properties of DNA and others are explored and
developed in detail in my two
books (1,2).

In a single posting it is impossible to develop the
arguments, but those
wishing to consider fresh aspects of the behaviour
of DNA may care to view
the newsgroup "bionet.biophysics" to which I am
currently posting the second
series of DNA Structure Puzzles intended to focus
attention on the wide
range of experimental data which is otherwise
unexplained in the literature.

The attachments to the DNA Structure Puzzles in
"bionet.biophsyics" include
sketches of how individual base pairs can themselves
form pairs, as well as
a sketch of a model of DNA which facilitates such
pairing.

To any interested subscribers, I could send e-mail
attachments of the scheme
for pairing base pairs, and of the framework of the
overall structure within
which such pairing is facilitated.
-------------------------------------------------------
1        Towards a New Structural Molecular Biology,>
by Clive Delmonte
 (1991) ISBN 0 9512276 0 2
 
 "...I find much of Delmonte's critique of other
 workers sound enough to
 raise doubt in my mind about the bulk of the
 classical work in this area.
 ...the book was an eye-opener."
 
 Prof. Steven Benner at Eidgenossische Technische
 Hochscule, Zurich
                         
 -------------------------------------------
 "...the widely accepted Watson-Crick model is
 inadequate to explain many
 important pieces of data, and in some cases defies
 intuitive biological and
 physical logic as a predictive model..I commend you
 on your recognition of
 inconsistencies in the story of DNA..you have the
 potential of changing
 molecular biology."
 
 Prof. Robert Hopkins at the School of Applied and
 Natural Sciences in the
 University of Houston at Clear Lake, Texas
                       
 ----------------------------------------------
 2        Advances in AFM & STM Applied to the
 Nucleic Acids, by Clive
 Delmonte (1997) ISBN 0 9512276 2 9, Library of
 Congress TX 4-856-037
 -----------------------------------------------
 Clive Delmonte
 
 
 Clive Delmonte
 E-mail: clived@ndirect.co.uk
       or: clivedelmonte@c-i-delmonte.freeserve.co.uk
 
 

===



Moderated
bionet.genome.gene-structure


_____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com

