From owner-emf-bio@net.bio.net Mon Jul 07 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: Bioelectromagnetics Journal <bems@cs.uwp.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.emf-bio
Subject: Bioelectromagnetics Vol. 18 No. 5, 1997 Table of Contents
Date: 7 Jul 1997 17:10:07 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 83
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Approved: afrey@uu.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9707031028.C1511-0100000@cs.uwp.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net


BIOELECTROMAGNETICS VOLUME 18, No. 5, 1997 Table of Contents
==============================================================================
NOTE: Please contact your library or the authors for reprints or further 
information about specific articles, NOT the editor, Society, or Publisher!

For information about the journal, contact the Editor.  For member 
subscription information, contact the Society at 7519 Ridge Road, 
Frederick, MD  21702-3519.  For library or other non-member subscription 
information, contact the Publisher, Wiley/Liss Inc., 605 Third Avenue, 
New York, NY  10158-0012, Attn.: Subscription Dept., 9th Floor.

Table of Contents from recent previous issues are available on the
Bioelectromagnetics Society Home Page (http://biomed.ucr.edu/bems.htm) or 
the Publishers' Home Page for this journal 
(http://journals.wiley.com/0197-8462/). 

Ben Greenebaum, Editor
University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Box 2000, Kenosha, WI  53141-2000
Internet: bems@cs.uwp.edu
==============================================================================
Bioelectromagnetics

Journal of Bioelectromagnetics Society, the Society for Physical 
Regulation in Biology and Medicine, and the European Bioelectromagnetics 
Association

Volume 18, Number 5, 1997

(c) Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Articles

341 Bioelectric Potential Gradients May Initiate Cell Cycling: ELF and 
Zeta Potential Gradients May Mimic This Effect
   J. Alan Beech

349 Interactions of Radiofrequency Radiation-Induced Hyperthermia and 
2-Methoxyethanol Teratogenicity in Rats
   B.K. Nelson, David L. Conover, Edward F. Krieg, Jr, Diana L. Snyder, 
and Richard M. Edwards

360 The Effects of 50 Hz Magnetic Field Exposure on 
Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene Induced Thymic Lumphoma/Leukemia in Mice
   Y.H. Shen, B.J. Shao, H. Chiang, Y.D. Fu, and M. Yu

365 Effects Function Analysis of ELF Magnetic Field Exposure in the 
Electric Utility Work Environment
   Jun Zhang, Indira Nair, and Jack Sahl

376 No Short-Term Effects of High-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on the 
Mammalian Pineal Gland
   L. Vollrath, R. Spessert, T. Kratzsch, M. Keiner, and H. Hollmann

388 The Role of Temporal Sensing in Bioelectromagnetic Effects
   T.A. Litovitz, M. Penafiel, D. Krause, D. Zhang, and J.M. Mullins

Brief Communication

396 Detection of Magnetism in the Red Imported Fire Ant (Solenopsis 
invicta) Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
   T.J. Slowik, B.L. Green, and H.G. Thorvilson

Comments

400 Comment on "Effects of 60 Hz Electromagnetic Fields on Early Growth 
in Three Plant Species and a Replication of Previous Results" by Mark S. 
Davies
   W.C. Parkinson

401 Reply to Parkinson
   Mark S. Davies

(c) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.










From owner-emf-bio@net.bio.net Tue Jul 08 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: amarino@lsumc.edu (Marino, Andrew)
Newsgroups: bionet.emf-bio
Subject: Statistical test for EMF bioeffects
Date: 9 Jul 1997 13:37:18 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 18
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Approved: afrey@uu.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <v03102800afe96ae0c199@[155.58.117.209]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Previously, I suggested that a new statistical test is needed to evaluate
EMF bioeffects studies - a test that took into consideration possible
EMF-induced effects on the mean or the variance. Such a test, the L test,
has now been developed. Details regarding the L test can be found at:
http://www.ortho.lsumc.edu/Faculty/Marino/Stat.html

*************************************
Andrew A. Marino, Ph.D.
Dept. Orthopaedic Surgery, LSUMC
P.O. Box 33932, Shreveport, LA  71130
Phone:  318-675-6177
Fax:  318-675-6186
email:  amarino@lsumc.edu
*************************************





From owner-emf-bio@net.bio.net Sat Jul 12 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: Allan Frey <afrey@UU.NET>
Newsgroups: bionet.emf-bio
Subject: Linet et al epidemiological study
Date: 13 Jul 1997 16:34:42 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 48
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Approved: afrey@uu.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <33C98EE6.7941@uu.net>
Reply-To: afrey@UU.NET
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Are the conclusions of the Linet et al epidemiological study and
associated editorial by Campion justified?  I think not.

Allan H. Frey
afrey@uu.net 

The fault, as is often the case in science, is in assumptions made
before the study began, assumptions upon which the study is based. If
the assumptions can not be shown to be true, then the conclusions are
not valid. 

In their statistical study, it was assumed that the active agent in
power line biological effects is the 60Hz sinusoidal wave.  But there is
substantial data and biological theory that indicate the primary active
agent would be the transients that are found on power lines in varying
forms to varying degrees in various places (Frey, 1994).  A broad
statistical study such as Linet et al's would tend to obscure such
effects since data from areas where there are effective transients would
be submerged in the mass of data from areas where there are not such
transients.  

Epidemiological studies, and statistical studies in general, are quite
useful for hypothesis generation. But they are not appropriate for
drawing conclusions. Causality can not be shown. There are just too many
unknown and uncontrolled factors operating in a large statistical study,
as compared to wet biological experiments.  This is particularly the
case with magnetic fields as an agent, for it is not yet clear what
parameters of the agent are of importance biologically.  

Is it appropriate to draw what may be life and death conclusions on the
basis of one statistical study that is based on an assumption about what
is the active agent, an assumption that can not be shown to be true?  I
doubt that many people would be willing to stake their life on one such
study.

Linet, M. et al. Residential Exposure to Magnetic Fields and Acute
Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children and editorial by E. Campion. New
England Journal of Medicine 333, 1997.

Frey, AH. On the nature of electromagnetic field interactions with
biological systems. RG Landes Co. Austin TX, 1994.

-- 
Allan H. Frey					Email:  afrey@uu.net
11049 Seven Hill Lane				Voice:  301.299.5181
Potomac, MD 20854,  USA



From owner-emf-bio@net.bio.net Wed Jul 16 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: liboff@oakland.edu (A.R. Liboff)
Newsgroups: bionet.emf-bio
Subject: Linet Study
Date: 17 Jul 1997 14:26:48 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 42
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Approved: afrey@uu.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <199707141718.NAA07765@cliff.acs.oakland.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

Like Allan Frey, I too have doubts concerning the implications of the Linet
study. 

Frey points to the possibility of transients as the metric underlying the
earlier correlations. 

Another possibility is that the geomagnetic field may be a complementary
factor, either because of cyclotron resonance or some other type of
resonance interaction. In connection with this it appears that Denver was
not one of the areas examined, which is puzzling considering the fact that
data from the Denver vicinity was the impetus for such epidemiological
studies. 

The media has characterized this study as the largest yet. For some time, I
have had the feeling that funding for such studies would continue until the
funders got the answer they wanted. Never mind the original objections to
the Wertheimer and Savitz results--that epidemiological studies were
"innately non-scientific" and did not prove anything. Now that the results
are more in line with what is desired, we are subjected to newspaper and TV
reports saying that this report is the final word.

Nowhere does the media awaken the public to the fact that since
Wertheimer's original 1979 results, there has arisen a wealth of
(laboratory) evidence showing that ELF magnetic fields can have profound
effects on living things. What in 1979 seemed inconceivable no longer
appears improbable.

Perhaps now that we have had, in the words of the media, the "final word",
the rest of us can get on with the science underlying these ELF
interactions, and, through the science, determine the consequences for
human hazard.

A,R, Liboff
Professor of Physics
Oakland University
Rochester, MI 48309
(248) 370-3412
liboff@oakland.edu





From owner-emf-bio@net.bio.net Wed Jul 16 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: "Mason, Patrick A." <patrick.mason@aloer.brooks.af.mil>
Newsgroups: bionet.emf-bio
Subject: Radiofrequency Radiation Dosimetry Handbook - Now on WWW
Date: 17 Jul 1997 14:14:48 -0700
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 16
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Approved: afrey@uu.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=BROOKSAFB%l=BASIA-970714160634Z-1328@basia.brooks.af.mil>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

The Radiofrequency Radiation Dosimetry Handbook (4th edition) (Durney et
al., 1986, USAFSAM-TR-85-73) has been converted into a digital format
and is now available on the World Wide Web (WWW) at:
http://www.brooks.af.mil/AL/OE/OER/handbook/cover.htm (some individuals
have stated that this address is case sensitive).  Converting the
handbook into a digital version was a collaboration between the
Radiofrequency Radiation Division at Brooks Air Force Base, Texas and
Cotton Computer Services, Helotes, Texas.  If you have any questions,
please contact William Hurt (210) 536-3167 or Patrick Mason (210)
536-2362 (patrick.mason@aloer.brooks.af.mil).  Thank you.

Patrick Mason, Ph.D.
Brooks AFB, TX




From owner-emf-bio@net.bio.net Wed Jul 16 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: cogreslab@aol.com (Cogreslab)
Newsgroups: bionet.emf-bio
Subject: Re: Linet et al epidemiological study
Date: 17 Jul 1997 14:30:14 -0700
Organization: AOL, http://www.aol.co.uk
Lines: 25
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Approved: afrey@uu.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <19970715200000.QAA24905@ladder02.news.aol.com>
References: <33C98EE6.7941@uu.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

>From Coghill Research Laboratories

As a lab who believes that the electric component is more biologically
important, we are not surprised that Dr Linet's study found no correation
with measured magnetic fields and the disorder of interest although we
note that if a 0.3microT cut-off point is used there appears to be a 1.8
elevation of risk).

The wire code configurations should however be a weak surrogate for
electric fields, so these need a closer appraisal if our view of the
importance of the electric field is to be supported. We are a little
concerned to see that the distance from powerlines in the Linet study  was
limited to 150 feet (46 metres). There is a study by Ward et al. (1986)
carried out by the UK National Grid showing that magnetic fields at over
100 metres distance from 400kV lines are still in excess of 0.2 microT,
(and elsewhere the NGC indicates that at 100 metres the electric component
may still exceed 30V/m).

This may have the effect in the Linet study of omitting a number of
leukaemia cases and thereby biasing the results towards the nul
hypothesis. Comments welcomed.

Roger Coghill cogreslab@aol.com



From owner-emf-bio@net.bio.net Fri Jul 18 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: Russell Senior <russell@emf-data.org>
Newsgroups: bionet.emf-bio
Subject: EMF Measurements Database -- Announcement!
Date: 19 Jul 1997 08:30:19 -0700
Organization: EMF Measurements Database
Lines: 69
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Approved: afrey@uu.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <86soxc54ek.fsf@coulee.tdb.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net



                   A newly revised and reorganized

          E M F   M E A S U R E M E N T S   D A T A B A S E

                          is now online at:
                                   
                      <http://www.emf-data.org>

The EMF Measurements Database is a project sponsored by the U.S.
Department of Energy through the EMF Research and Public Information
Dissemination (EMF RAPID) Program. The purpose of the project is to
make measurements of electric and magnetic fields publicly available.

Two data sets are currently available for immediate free download.
Additional data sets are in the pipeline.  Anyone is welcome to use
this data, subject to a user license.

The two data sets are:

001 Personal 24 Hour Emdex Pilot Project: Lynne Gillette and Doreen
    Hill, EPA, 1992.

    This project involved twenty volunteers who wore EMDEX C meters
    for 24 hours (including a typical work/school day) and logged
    information about their activities and possible sources of
    magnetic fields they encountered.

002 Household Appliance Magnetic Field Data: James R. Gauger, IITRI, 1983.

    The results of a non-comprehensive survey of the 60-Hz magnetic
    fields produced by common household appliances and tools are
    reported. Maximum magnetic field levels as a function of distance
    for 95 appliances of 27 basic types are characterized by
    measurement.

Additional data sets in the pipeline include an office worker study
completed at the University of Washington by Patricia Hogue and
Michael Yost, as well as data from some of the other EMF RAPID Program
Engineering Projects.

The web site includes information on using the data products as well
as how to contribute your data to the EMF Measurements Database so
that others may benefit by it.

We welcome any comments, suggestions or questions.  If you would like
to contact the EMF Measurements Database we can be reached ...

...by email at: info@emf-data.org

...by phone at: (503) 233-2181

...by USPS at:  EMF Measurements Database
                T. Dan Bracken, Inc.
                5415 S.E. Milwaukie Avenue
                Portland, Oregon  97202

-- 
Russell Senior                                     russell@emf-data.org
EMF Measurements Database                       http://www.emf-data.org
T. Dan Bracken, Inc.                                     (503) 233-2181
Portland, Oregon  97202                              FAX (503) 233-2665







From owner-emf-bio@net.bio.net Sun Jul 27 23:00:00 1997
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: "Timothy E. Vaughan" <tvaughan@epore.mit.edu>
Newsgroups: bionet.emf-bio
Subject: Re: Linet Study
Date: 28 Jul 1997 11:52:38 -0700
Organization: Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology
Lines: 13
Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
Approved: afrey@uu.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <33DCA42C.68C0@epore.mit.edu>
References: <199707141718.NAA07765@cliff.acs.oakland.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

> Nowhere does the media awaken the public to the fact that since
> Wertheimer's original 1979 results, there has arisen a wealth of
> (laboratory) evidence showing that ELF magnetic fields can have profound
> effects on living things. What in 1979 seemed inconceivable no longer
> appears improbable.

Could you please cite three or so laboratory studies (from outside your
own lab) that you consider to be top-notch evidence that there is a
biological effect from weak, ELF magnetic fields?

Tim



