?2_Point_Data vs. ?2_point_data
matthews at GREENGENES.CIT.CORNELL.EDU
Tue Jun 13 05:40:38 EST 1995
> From rd at sanger.ac.uk Tue Jun 13 05:17:50 1995
> To: matthews at greengenes.cit.cornell.edu
> Subject: Re: ?2_Point_Data vs. ?2_point_data
> Currently the internal version would win out for display. I would
> prefer that the version in options.wrm wins. That is the per-class file.
> models.wrm is about models, not classes. You can have an array class
> with no model, and a model for a subtype with no class.
Okay. I hadn't been sensitive to that difference or the philosophies to be
drawn from it.
More information about the Acedb