CDS tags....
Ed Griffiths
edgrif at sanger.ac.uk
Tue Aug 29 08:30:14 EST 2000
Ian,
> I don't really have any great feeling either way about in which coordinate set
> the CDS description should be (although working in coordinates of what is
> essentially a subsequence of a subsequence, while more correctly representing
> the biology, is harder to get your head around).
Current concensus seems to favour having spliced-DNA coords.
> What I would like is to see this all properly implemented so that we can get
> around the awful fudge that is prevalent now in the sanger human acedbs whereby
> to describe the translated portion of a transcript two subsequence objects are
> made, the transcript itself and then the translated (CDS) object. To make this
> look nice the views of the two objects are tweaked so that they are in different
> colours and the translation lies on top.
I don't see why we can't do this, it will require some changes to fmap code and
maybe a new tag, I'm not sure at the moment, but basically the code is all there
to do it.
> What seems nicer to me would be to only make transcript subsequences, and to
> describe the translation of these using CDS Int Int in whatever coordinates are
> deemed appropriate, and to add in a function to colour or fill in the translated
> portion of the transcript in the fmap display. (BTW I presume that the system
> allows description of the translation of polycistronic messages?)
I don't see why we can't do this. My only doubts are that I don't know what
polycistronic means....
cheers Ed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Ed Griffiths, Acedb development, Informatics Group, |
| The Sanger Centre, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, |
| Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK |
| |
| email: edgrif at sanger.ac.uk URL: http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Users/edgrif |
| Tel: +44-1223-494780 Fax: +44 1223 494919 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Acedb
mailing list