richard g. adair
xm9 at sdcc12.ucsd.edu
Tue Dec 7 15:21:39 EST 1993
In article <2dsu72$pg1 at news.acns.nwu.edu> len at schur.math.nwu.edu (Len Evens) writes:
>Someone complained recently that there were too many flames about
>the spelling or grammar of postings. It was suggested that we concentrate
>on the substance of a posting rather than its form. However, on some
>occasions, grammatical and other inadequacies make it very difficult,
>if not impossible, for some of us to understand the substance. The
>posting below is an example.
>In article <CHJ7JL.LoK at murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rjw9y at envsci.evsc.virginia.edu. (rjw9y) writes:
>>i have been reviewing the scientific jounals for cliamte change
>>articles and reviewing them for a fellowship over the last 2 years. My
I was the one who originally posted on this.
Sure, in cases where there is confusion, no problem. Ask for
specific clarifications, politely. I didn't mean to suggest otherwise.
The guidelines on this were written to discourage bashing and ridicule.
Further, NetNews is global in its membership, and so a certain amount
of language mangling is to be expected. However, to condemn somebody
for obvious slips of the fingers is neither productive nor fair. I was
prompted to post by this sort of flaming. Specifically, as the parting
shot of a thoroughly uncivil response, a poster was bashed for the
omission of an irrelevant apostrophe.
I urge you to read the NetNews guidelines, which I'm pretty sure
every NetNews facility maintains, on spelling and grammar flames.
More information about the Ag-forst