How many trees?

D. Braun dbraun at
Fri Mar 1 16:07:03 EST 1996

On Fri, 1 Mar 1996, D. Braun wrote:

> On 1 Mar 1996, Robert G. Weinberger wrote:
> > 
> > The original poster specifically asked "How many trees would 
> > have to be destroyed to produce 563,000 sheets of copy 
> > paper?"(neither grade of copy paper nor size of paper or trees
> > were specified).  Other comments in the original post gave 
> > strong indication that the poster's understanding of forests and 
> > papermaking was probably gained *primarily* from reading books and 
> > flying over the forest - not unlike the indications one gets from 
> (snip)>  
> > Bob Weinberger - 
> > Not a scientist, but a manager who uses scientists and 
> > scientific method to gain a clearer understanding of complex biological
> > processes, so that I may better accomplish goals that I, my employers, 
> > our customers, and much of society deem to be good. 
> >                                                        
> I guess I am "the poster".  I really don't have time any more to respond 
> to your attacks on my credibility.  Be it known that bias rests in every 
> human's observations and interpretations of the natural world.  To claim 
> otherwise is simply not true.
> 		-- Dave Braun ("the poster")

Correction: I was NOT the original poster to this thread; I was the first 
to post in response to Jack ----, the person that responded to the 
question about trees and paper.  I am not in the habit of posting 
questions just to get a thread started--- I think this is called 
"trolling".  I just misread the latest message in this thread, which I 
think has run its course.  This is obvious to me when my detailed 
responses are met with personal attacks, instead of discussion of the 

			Dave Braun 

More information about the Ag-forst mailing list