EF! Fined $1million in Idaho

[David Whitt]

In article <56b3r4$744_001 at pm5-39.hal-pc.org>,
charliew <charliew at hal-pc.org> wrote:
>In article <5697j7$111 at newz.oit.unc.edu>,
>   davwhitt at med.unc.edu (David Whitt) wrote:
>>
>>In article <568ao9$6r0_003 at pm1-82.hal-pc.org>,
>>charliew <charliew at hal-pc.org> wrote:
>>>In article <566eq5$4vt at newz.oit.unc.edu>,
>>>   davwhitt at med.unc.edu (David Whitt) wrote:
>>>(cut)
>>>>What difference does it make?  I am not against corporations just for
>>>>being corporations.  Some actually do good things, many do.  I am,
>>>>however, against corporations (and people) who I see as doing things which
>>>>are wrong.  The law is fluid and changes over time.  Slavery was once
>>>>legal.  Women once had no rights.  In most places in my state gays can be
>>>>fired, denied housing, and arrested for making love to their companion,
>>>>all legally.  What is legal and what is right are not always the same.  
>>>
>>>
>>>The 64 million dollar question is: Do you advocate illegal 
>>>actions to stop an activity that you consider legal but 
>>>"wrong"?
>>
>>
>>Apparently your reading comprehension skills are inadequate for this
>>debate.  Please re-read my post and if you have any sense what-so-ever,
>>you will find your question redundant.
>>
>
>Apparently, you are not willing to answer a simple question.


Since you do not seem to infer from my post that the answer is yes, let me
say it - yes.  If the cause is just and the activity non-violent then I
see no problem with it.




      ****                   David Whitt     davwhitt at med.unc.edu
     ** ***
         **                  No one can make you feel inferior
         ***                 without your consent.
         ****                                 -Eleanor Roosevelt
        ***  *
       ***   **   *          People often find it easier to be a result
      ***    ******          of the past than a cause of the future.
     ***       ***