EF! Fined $1million in Idaho
dbraun at u.washington.edu
Thu Nov 21 16:56:38 EST 1996
On 16 Nov 1996, Mike Asher wrote:
> David Whitt <davwhitt at med.unc.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > >Anthropomorphism carried to extremity. Sorry, but I will never attend
> > >"funeral" of a tree. They're plants....sometimes lovely, sometimes
> > >hideous, sometimes useful, sometimes not. But they're just plants. I
> > >won't play a dirge for dead grass in my yard either. I'll just plant
> > >more. Just like we do trees.
> > While they may be "just" plants, they support all life on this planet,
> > including mankind. It is in our best interest to not destroy them.
> Who proposed destroying every plant on the planet? When trees are cut
> down, new ones are planted. The newer trees actually grow faster, and
> perform far better at CO2 uptake and oxygen creation than old-growth
Propaganda. The issue is storage of carbon in old-growth (and primary
forests), which can be several times greater on an area basis. I have
made this point before.
> > >> ...Ask yourself one question: "Why?" Why are environmentalists
> > >> environmentalists? Is there money to gain by our position?
> > >
> > >Ask yourself one question: "Why are serial murderers murderers? Is
> > >money to be made from it?"
> > Are you saying that environmentalists are on par with murderers or is
> > simply a red herring?
> I'll explain the logic behind this, using small words. An opionion was set
> forth that, because environmentalists (sorry for the long one there) are
> not motivated by money, that they must be right and good and true. I
> disproved the statement by showing a contradictory member, i.e., serial
> murderers. I made no claims as to how many environmentalists were in fact
> serial murderers, mind you.
Pure bs, Mike.
> > What is good for the planet is good for humans too. This is ONE planet,
> > not two (one for nature and one for man).
> Yes, but what is best for a roach, or a spotted owl, or a white pine tree,
> is not neccesarily whats best for humans. And, in many cases,
> environmentalists are actually harming the planet they claim to protect.
More pure bs. Please support these assertions.
> > ... you simply have been
> > brainwashed by all of those Dow and Dupont commercials (to name a few)
> > telling you they're so good and that they really care about us and the
> > environment.
> I can't recall ever seeing a Dow commercial. Perhaps you can tell me how
> one goes?
> Mike Asher
> masher at tusc.net
More information about the Ag-forst