Board Feet From Logs?
redoak at forestmeister.com
Mon Oct 13 20:05:08 EST 1997
mcready at northernnet.com wrote:
> Environmentalists are always harping about save the white pine, save the
> red pine, save this tree, etc. They have recently calls for 'zero-cut' in
> National Forests, which to me doesn't represent forest management at all.
If all cutting on National Forests was stopped, the timber prices on
private land would go up, and since I sell timber off private land- my
fees would go up- so if I want to be selfish which of course is the WAY
in our greedy capitalist society - I should encourage stopping such
National Forest harvesting. <G>
> Why do many environmentalists have log homes? If we should 'save all our
> trees' why aren't they crying about all the trees wasted on their homes?
Very few environmentalists say all harvesting should stop on National
Forests, most say it could be done better.
> Wouldn't it be nice if educated foresters, not environmentalists, could
> manage our forests? Forest management has come a long way since the
> clear-cutting of the early 1900s.
Ya know, there is no reason why this distinction should be made between
foresters and environmentalists. It's foolish and backward thinking.
We're all environmentalists. A friend of mine in the USFS once used the
word "environmentalist" as if describing some loathsome creature- some
despicable communist. Foresters should give up this primitive
perspective. No wonder foresters have such a bad reputation as
Neanderthals among environmentalists. Foresters will get more respect in
the society at large if they BECOME "environmental foresters". Or to use
the motto of Microsoft- "embrace and extend". Seize their thunder by
listenting to what they have to say, then LEAD.
"The ONLY forester's web page in the otherwise sophisticated state of
More information about the Ag-forst