RESULT: sci.forestry.misc & misc.industry.wood-products.misc both fail
dstaples at livingston.net
Fri Sep 12 08:24:24 EST 1997
Joseph Zorzin wrote:
> OK, who are the guilty parties voting no? <G>
> I suppose this one group serves the purpose, but I'm tired of seeing
> that agro term, as it really is irrelevant. So why can't usenet work
> like a democracy with the majority ruling? This isn't a constituional
> amendment for crying out loud. And for those of you too lazy to vote,
> shame! Be sure to do so next time.
> Actually I wouldn't mind seeing a group called
> bionet.forestry.consultant, for the elite of the profession. The creme
> de la creme.
> Don't you agree Don Staples, the leader in Texas forestry? <G>
You bet, but right now i am packing my bags for the Headwaters. Seems
they need some hired guns to defend private ownership in the west.
Ego Stroke: http://www.livingston.net/dstaples/
More information about the Ag-forst