State Agencies
Don Staples
dstaples at livingston.net
Tue Jan 6 10:38:50 EST 1998
Steve Nix, in either a post here or by e-mail, commentted on limited
funding for state agecies. So, as an example, I thought I would post
one state agencies budget and breakdown. That is for Missouri, Texas
doesn't like to talk about theirs.
Missouri Conservation Commission gets .7% of the state budget, some
$122,521,232.00 in 1996-97 fiscal year. Of this the main source is a
Conservation Sales Tax that brought in 61.5%.
Disbursements are:
Land Aquisition: n 9.8% (interesting, a state buying land)
Admin: 1.7%
Admin Services: 17%
Constrution/development: 8.7%
Design and Development: 2.5%
FORESTRY: 14%
Wildlife: 14%
Fisheries: 10.2
Law Enforcement: 10.9%
Natural History: 1.2%
Outreach and Education: 9.5%
Susan, would you care to comment on effectiveness of programs?
Missouri, to me, reflects some of the best use of tax dollars in a state
agency. Texas has no Natural History expenditure in any of its many
resource agencies. And I would doubt if 1% went to Outreach and
Education in Texas. The really interesting thing in Missouri is the
land purchase, a conservation agency actually preserving by buying,
outragious! And forestry and wildlife getting 28% of the budget. Well
done, Missouri, the Show Me State may show us some real use of tax
monies.
--
Don Staples
UIN 4653335
My Ego Stroke: http://www.livingston.net/dstaples/
More information about the Ag-forst
mailing list