A Really Silly Idea
woodtick at lebmofo.com
Thu Mar 5 15:55:52 EST 1998
Karl Davies wrote:
> A REALLY SILLY IDEA
> What if the forest products industries were to stake out the
> environmental high ground on the issue of climate change?
I didn't realize that the industry was taking the low ground. I think
the industry is pretty neutral on the subject of climate change, after
all we are in a carbon neutral or lessening industry. Do you think we
could put a dent in fossil fuel consumption? Look what has happened
to all those co-gen projects throughout the country. Biomass cannot
compete with fossil fuels. Gasoline has slipped to .96, and with
lower consumption in the Pacific rim, these prices could slip further.
> What would happen if the forest products industries (with great
> public fanfare) <G> were to renounce their own subsidies and
> challenge the fossil fuel industries to do the same? What if
> timber industries were to insist on paying for road construction
> to Forest Service timber sales?
Here in the East, there are very few subsidies to our mills, other
than R&D and most mills don't take advantage of that. Road
construction on State sales are deducted from the stumpage prices.
Doesn't this happen of Fed sales?
> The obvious big question on these moves would be whether the
> returns would offset the costs. Loss of free road construction
> would hurt some companies big time. All companies would have to
> pony up something for the trust and the public relations
Most industry associations have taken on PR campaigns. Small,
individual mills cannot afford such luxuries.
> But the long-term bottom line would certainly be positive. There
> would be much lower risk of damage from hurricanes, tornadoes,
> ice storms, wildfires, insect and disease outbreaks. Mortality
> rates would decline and growth rates would increase.
> Foresters and forest products industries would be transformed
> from environmental pariahs into heroes. <G> And we/they could
> continue to embrace Adam Smith, John Locke and other apostles of
> economic self-interest. <G> We could have our cake and eat it
> too. Or am I dreaming?
> Karl Davies, Consulting Forester
> Northampton, MA
Yes, you're dreaming. We can't even get a concensus of how forest
mgmt should be carried out, let alone larger debates on global
warming. I would like to remind you that the Kyoto accord didn't even
raise an eyebrow in this NG.
More information about the Ag-forst