Group Appreciation

LRLake lrlake at aol.com
Mon Mar 9 19:16:33 EST 1998




Ron Wenrich wrote:
>Let's interject a little realism.  There is nowhere, that I know of, where
>foresters
>are required to work on private lands.

Try California.  If you own the land, you are exempt from "practicing forestry"
when acting on yur own behalf.

There are few other exceptions.  The Feds can do their own thing but require
Licensed contractors for work which is considered "practicing forestry" under
California law.

FYI

Lawrence Lake, RPF
Redding, CA



More information about the Ag-forst mailing list