kmorrisd at aol.com
Sun Nov 29 14:02:36 EST 1998
Mike Hagen <mhagen at olympus.net> wrote:
>That's all well and good but
>a) SAF has a private list for members which is where they'll go for "serious"
>discussions" if they get razzed too much
What's this? The "santum santorum?" I didn't know, but I should have guessed.
>b) the heat seems to be on for the USFS, but I strongly suspect, there aren't
>too many of them in the SAF. The org is much bigger among state and private
>foresters where membership is expected for career advancement.
Well, we need to be taking all this stuff to our local priests, as well as the
higher-ups in Rome, er, Washington.
>c) the rank and file still can't read newsgroups or voice opinions. They'll
>a Congressman down on their backs!
And some bishop would file a petition to have them excommunicated. <G> Hmmm, I
wonder if they have one in the works for me?
More information about the Ag-forst