Tulloch Rule (Wetlands)
dhogaza at pacifier.com
Fri Jan 22 16:26:06 EST 1999
In article <78925c$1av$1 at nnrp1.dejanews.com>, <Langrrr at aol.com> wrote:
>Clause 2: (which is what I meant by describing it as not being a
>Constitutional property rights case).
which is what I meant to say, I meant to say.
Now, are you HAPPY, Andrew?
I hope your employer feels they're getting good value for the
money they pay you to post here.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza at pacifier.com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, at http://donb.photo.net
More information about the Ag-forst