Tulloch Rule (Wetlands)

Don Baccus dhogaza at pacifier.com
Fri Jan 22 16:26:06 EST 1999


In article <78925c$1av$1 at nnrp1.dejanews.com>,  <Langrrr at aol.com> wrote:

>Clause 2: (which is what I meant by describing it as not being a
>Constitutional property rights case).

which is what I meant to say, I meant to say.

Now, are you HAPPY, Andrew?

I hope your employer feels they're getting good value for the
money they pay you to post here.

-- 

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza at pacifier.com>
  Nature photos, on-line guides, at http://donb.photo.net



More information about the Ag-forst mailing list