slick propaganda by Weyerhaeuser??
mhagen at olympus.net
Mon Mar 29 11:57:29 EST 1999
As it stands now companies which export logs or are not in the immediate
geographic area can not bid on DNR sales. There has been a (no surprise
here) big drop in state revenues because of this. Last week, a change
was proposed to remove that restriction.
What isn't clear to me is how the "export restricted" clause which is on
virtually all state sale prospectus will be treated. They could remove
it if they want to increase the bids or just increase the number of
"exportable " sales allowed. Smaller companies than W. would share in
the rise as well since there are still quite a few export log buyers in
The substitution problem would likely get as sticky as it was back when
FS sales were common. It's very difficult to track logs once they've
entered a sorting yard.
Jim Frost wrote:
> Are you saying that Weyer. cannot bid on (ie. Wash DNR sales) or accept
> public timber if it exports as suggested in what Michael Hagen wrote or
> did I not get what was written?
> HULTGREN wrote:
> > It's called 'substitution' and it's not allowed, even at arm's length.
> > Jim Frost <jimfrost at hctc.com> wrote in message
> > news:36FD9B92.7D55 at hctc.com..
> > >Michael Hagen wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Very cool. And now I have to objection to their being able to bid on
> > >> Washington State DNR timber sales, from which had been banned
> > >> previously, to prevent the mixing of domestic and exportable logs.
> > >
> > >Since when? I thought that if a company is a exporter they are not
> > >allowed to buy public timber. Did they take the step I've seen some
> > >companies do, create a new arms-length company, that allows them to bid
> > >on public sales? And if so, they couldn't sell it the the Weyerhaeusr
> > >mills, could they? Who do they sell it to?
> > >
> > >Jim
More information about the Ag-forst