Environmentalists Call for Fair Grazing Fees

HULTGREN arne at snowcrest.net
Wed Sep 15 21:42:43 EST 1999

USFS grazing allotments don't include fencing, water, management, and
usually are on marginally productive forage. This means not many animals can
be carried, per acre. The 'fair market value' of USFS/BLM grazing lands is
waaaaay below what you'd Old MacDonald to graze your steers on his lush,
fenced and watered pasture. They graze them in the remote mountains to
preserve grazing close to home for the Fall-Winter-Spring season....
Jim C <jcampbell90 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7r0mhf$7ef$1 at news.ipa.net...
>As a public forester I spent years opposing public land grazing.  Only
>recently have I noted the benefits of biomass management to reduce fine
>fuels that spread forest/range fires and even control alternate hosts of
>some diseases that affect trees.  This needs research to evaluate the
>potential benefits that might even justify the elimination of fees for
>grazing.  Fencing, administration, etc does cost the taxpayer, but so does
>response to preventable fires.  What about it, folks?

More information about the Ag-forst mailing list