Environmentalists Want To Save The Forests From Logging by Burning Them
lparker at NOSPAM.emory.edu
Tue Aug 27 09:41:02 EST 2002
In article <506ee3c0.0208270110.21c615cc at posting.google.com>,
jamesjosephbriggs at yahoo.com (flamestar) wrote:
>I don't ignore them at all. It is my belief that they are hired by
>groups like the Sierra Club to burn the forests.
Then you might want to think about defending yourself from a libel
>After all according
>to the Sierra Club Forest Fires are like sunshine and all they are
>doing is bringing a little sun shine to the forests.
>Here's what the Sierra Club has actually said:
>"[Fire] is not a good thing or a bad thing. It's part of the system.
>like sunshine and rain."
>-- Jim Brenner, Fire Management Administrator for the Florida
Well, first, this person isn't identified as a Sierra Club member.
Second, what he said is correct.
>Logging interests and pro-business federal agencies claim that we need
>destroy our wild forests to help prevent dangerous forest fires. In
>reverse is true: logging has been shown to multiply the risk of
>forest fires. That's because timber companies cut down the largest
>are the most resistant to fire, leaving behind flammable smaller trees
>piles of debris. As this report shows, we need to protect, not log,
>national forests - now more than ever.
>Download the Full Report (1.3-mb Acrobat file)
>dwheeler at ipns.com (Daniel B. Wheeler) wrote in message
news:<6dafee1b.0208261703.25cf7839 at posting.google.com>...
>> jamesjosephbriggs at yahoo.com (flamestar) wrote in message
news:<506ee3c0.0208250505.bf999d8 at posting.google.com>...
>> > Environmentalists are the only one's who have a motive to commit
>> > in National forests as they would rather have forests burned then
>> > logged.
>> You ignore the number of fires set by forest service and inactive
>> firefighters this year.
>> As I would expect.
>> Flamestar has stupornova'd.
>> Daniel B. Wheeler
More information about the Ag-forst