Report says Klamath panel erred
Daniel B. Wheeler
dwheeler at ipns.com
Sun Nov 24 22:31:07 EST 2002
Larry Caldwell <larryc at teleport.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.184b052a2492639998a36d at news.earthlink.net>...
> In article <6dafee1b.0211231415.178e1db6 at posting.google.com>,
> dwheeler at ipns.com writes:
>
> > There does appear to be an agenda. I don't see the Klamath tribe
> > involved in it, since their tribe legally doesn't exist at this time
> > to my knowledge.
>
> You are very mistaken. Plus, it is the Klamath TribeS. There are Modoc,
> Paiute and Klamath tribes involved in the Klamath Basin. They have all
> had official tribal status restored, but they didn't get their
> reservations back.
I'd still like to see something more than just your informed opinion,
Larry. If I am mistaken, a citation would certainly prove that
allegation.
Daniel B. Wheeler
www.oregonwhitetruffles.com
More information about the Ag-forst
mailing list