Report says Klamath panel erred

Daniel B. Wheeler dwheeler at ipns.com
Sun Nov 24 22:31:07 EST 2002


Larry Caldwell <larryc at teleport.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.184b052a2492639998a36d at news.earthlink.net>...
> In article <6dafee1b.0211231415.178e1db6 at posting.google.com>, 
> dwheeler at ipns.com writes: 
>  
> > There does appear to be an agenda. I don't see the Klamath tribe
> > involved in it, since their tribe legally doesn't exist at this time
> > to my knowledge.
> 
> You are very mistaken.  Plus, it is the Klamath TribeS.  There are Modoc, 
> Paiute and Klamath tribes involved in the Klamath Basin.  They have all 
> had official tribal status restored, but they didn't get their 
> reservations back.
I'd still like to see something more than just your informed opinion,
Larry. If I am mistaken, a citation would certainly prove that
allegation.

Daniel B. Wheeler
www.oregonwhitetruffles.com



More information about the Ag-forst mailing list