"Natural forest devastation"?
Donald L Ferrt
wolfbat359 at mindspring.com
Sat Jun 5 18:46:00 EST 2004
lhfotoware at hotmail.com (Larry Harrell) wrote in message news:<7a90c754.0406012127.107d75dd at posting.google.com>...
> wxdano9 at hotmail.com (Dano) wrote in message news:<e351cb91.0405301900.3b41ca0a at posting.google.com>...
> > lhfotoware at hotmail.com (Larry Harrell) wrote in message news:<7a90c754.0405291804.5b77e6db at posting.google.com>...
> > [snip]
> > > Yep, we can't let facts get in the way of a good story.
> > you can have a reporter not understand the issue and then the purty
> > fact you wanted to get out is obfuscated. You can control the message
> > if you're savvy. That's 'control'.
> I see many articles involving the Forest Service everyday. Most of
> them are slanted in one way or another. I also see lots of those kind
> of articles posted here and other groups. I do like to comment on them
> from time to time and expose "departures from reality". For example,
> an otherwise respectable looking "organization" was pleading with
> people to write letters and e-mails to stop the Forest Service from
> clearcutting the roadless areas. Since the Forest Service has NEVER
> proposed anything like that, what is the use in pushing those kind of
> lies? BTW, I'm also against the "stealth tactics" in establishing
> environmental policies, used by both sides.
Because under Bush, such roadless areas don't exist anymore!
More information about the Ag-forst