[Agroforestry] Re: Ag-forst Digest, Vol 12, Issue 1
Ronald Maldonado Rodriguez
maldona8 at etu.unige.ch
Thu Jun 8 00:12:45 EST 2006
About your question : 1. EtOH-CH4 pipeline conversion/corrosion
i) why converting EtOH to CH4, when CH3OH to CH4 and back is cheaper?
ii) possibly, developing new anticorrosive materials for pipeline
manufacture is a cheaper solution
> Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:59:16 +0000 (UTC)
> From: vjp2.at at at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com
> Subject: [Agroforestry] EtOH-CH4 pipeline conversion/corrosion
> To: ag-forst at net.bio.net
> Message-ID: <e66pk4$jqi$1 at reader2.panix.com>
> Can EtOH be CHEAPLY converted back and forth to CH4?
> EtOH is too corrosive for existing pipelines. All the corn in the USA
> would only supply 10% of the EtOH to power our cars. Cellulosic EtOH
> requires an additional dextrochiralisation process. Simplex coal and
> gasification was developed by Hap Schulz during WW2.
> I'm thinking there have to be conversion innovations (like using
> to convert kerosene to gasoline) that will only come with extensive use,
> hence accidents and experimentation. You should be able to take in
> (corn silage, apple waste, garbage) and produce energy (EtOh, H2, CH4) as
> essentially an "interconvetable triad".
> Ag-forst mailing list
> Ag-forst at net.bio.net
> End of Ag-forst Digest, Vol 12, Issue 1
More information about the Ag-forst