Lawyers To The Rescue
dashley at TENET.EDU
Wed Mar 1 00:10:30 EST 1995
My apologies for any bashing implied. It is easy for me to spot the
prejudice in others, but my own stereotyping of occupational groups
shamefully surfaces in inappropriate conversations. I just negate myself
when I devalue groups without indivuation.
Can you help us with suggestions about how we can take action to promote
research (funding and investing) for the advancement of genetic
anti-aging research; specifically immortality studies?
With your expertise, you can outline efficient political strategy for
those of us who don't want to go back and study genetics and
biochemistry. We are not interested, however, in sitting around and waiting
for others to determine our destiny.
This is a long shot that is as controversial as it is revolutionary.
Consider, though, the benefits for mankind when a breakthrough surfaces.
On 26 Feb 1995, Ronald B. Keys J.D. Ph.D wrote:
> Is it really necessary to bash lawyers, here? Some lawyers are even very
> nice and like myself, have been a member of the Life Extension Foundation
> since 1983. I publish as a public advocate as well as a clinician
> counseling professional on this and a number of other biology-related
> databases. And my material is on patient assessment, molecular biology and
> metabolic pathways, not pathways to the courtroom. Lets stop lumping and
> generalizing and getting negative or you are just going to turn people off.
> Be professional and act like menschen.
> >From the cutting edge,
> Ronald B. Keys, JD, PhD (rkeysphd at pipeline.com)
> National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys
> American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine
> American Academy of Clinical Gerontology
> International Association of Biomedical Gerontology
> American Aging Association
> Life Extension Foundation
> Professional Mediator
More information about the Ageing