Coles and Harris' CoQ10 Study (was Re: A4M Discussion)

William Stevens wms at metronet.com
Sat Mar 4 13:13:02 EST 1995


<D4x7uD.KnF at midway.uchicago.edu>
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.91.6

In article <D4x7uD.KnF at midway.uchicago.edu>, bmdelane at ellis.uchicago.edu 
(Brian Manning Delaney) says:
>
>In article <JJ.95Mar3185139 at columbus.cis.ohio-state.edu> 
jj at columbus.cis.ohio-state.edu (John Josephson) wrote, among other 
things:
>>I'm not especially interested in living long, independently of the
>>quality of life.  That is, I'd gladly give up some of the feeble
>>period at the end for some enhanced "youthification" before.
>
>But the situation is quite dynamic: Q is whether the extra "feeble"
>years carry you to a time where de-feeblification is possible. If the
>answer is No -- and the tricky part here is that we just can't answer
>the Q yet -- then I agree w/your above statement.
>
>-- 
>Brian M. Delaney <b-delaney at uchicago.edu> [DO NOT cc: articles to me.]

Wouldn't the two goals, life extension and life quality, be more useful 
with some symetry (sp?)  I agree with John's point.  There is not much 
point in living longer if you do it in pain and feebleness.  Not to 
mention the increased cost to continue those frails years at the end of 
life.




More information about the Ageing mailing list