Nereis speciation event 2nd thoughts

Jon Norenburg norenbur at onyx.si.edu
Thu Mar 21 08:35:34 EST 1996


>Usenet post by Joseph E Boxhorn. Forwarded to ANNELIDA for comment. I have not
>yet seen the paper referred to. (For non-usenetters an FAQ is a document of
>Frequently Asked Questions (with answers :-)) GBR.
>===========================================================================
>
> From: jboxhorn at alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Joseph E Boxhorn)
> Newsgroups: talk.origins
> Subject: Observed Speciation FAQ
> Date: 20 Mar 1996 03:56:56 GMT
> Organization: Information & Media Technologies, University of Wisconsin -
>   Milwaukee
> Lines: 79
> Distribution: world
>
> Some recently published data calls into question whether one of the
> examples listed in the Observed Instances of Speciation FAQ actually
> represents a speciation event.  In the FAQ I wrote:

Very interesting.  It's tempting to use hindsight to make some snide
comments about this event - but I think the lesson is obvious, the studies
were well-executed, and I certainly can see myself falling into the same
pit; and the event actually is instructive in its way.  I find particularly
ironic the implications this has for the escalating use of citation index
numbers (esp. here in the US) by tenure and promotion committees - do you
suppose anyone will tell these committees explicitly that these two spikes
should be treated as subtractive?
--Jon

Jon L. Norenburg
Department of Invertebrate Zoology-MRC 163
National Museum of Natural History
Washington, DC  20560





More information about the Annelida mailing list