This is in response to Alastair Grant's comment that, based on "molecular
work," clitellates belong "somewhere between a family and an 'order'."
Regardless of whether systematic research is based on molecules,
ultrastructure, morphology, what have you, the notion of some group
belonging kinda in an order or maybe kinda like a family is completely
irrelevant. The issue at hand is whether recognition of a monophyletic
"clitellata" of some rank can be justified relative to a monophyletic
Polychaeta. It makes no difference what the ranks are for these taxa
since this simply places taxa into a more inclusive hierarchy of
relationships. Let's worry more about discerning the patterns of
relationship and less about whether groups should be subphyla, classes, ad
nauseum.
At 08:44 AM 1/22/97 +0000, you wrote:
>>I see there is a school which elevates the clitellates to a subphylum
>>Based on molecular work, I would be more inclined to put Clitellata on a
>par with polychaete families, or at most somewhere between a family and an
>"order". Alastair Grant
>>School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
>Phone 01603 592537 Fax 01603 507719
>Email: A.Grant at uea.ac.uk WWW: http://www.uea.ac.uk/~e130/ag.htm
Thanks for your time,
Kirk
"...the process of evaluating a given hypothesis against reality is not
reasoning at all."
P.A. Flach
-----------------------------------------------------
Dr. Kirk Fitzhugh, Associate Curator of Polychaetes
Invertebrate Zoology Section
Research & Collections Branch
Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History
900 Exposition Blvd
Los Angeles CA 90007
Phone: 213-744-3233
FAX: 213-746-2999
e-mail: fitzhugh at bcf.usc.edu
----------------------------------------------------
-- ANNELIDA
Discuss = annelida at net.bio.net = talk to all members
Server = biosci-server at net.bio.net = un/subscribes
Archives = http://www.bio.net:80/hypermail/ANNELIDA/
Resources = http://www.keil.ukans.edu/~worms/annelid.html
--
