Helmut Zibrowius wrote:
> In matters of representivity of Zoological Record
> (at least in mollusc matters and some years ago),
> see these papers:
There is further Bouchet analysis of Zoo Rec in:
Bouchet, P. 1997: Inventorying the molluscan diversity of the world: what
is our rate of progress. The Veliger 40: 1-11.
(Trends from analysis of 12 thousand names from Zoo Record.)
Bouchet, P. 1999: Recording and registration of new scientific names: a
simulation of the mechanism proposed (but not adopted) for the
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Bulletin of Zoological
Nomenclature 56: 6-15.
(Examination of the defects in Zoological Record coverage during 1980-
92 in relation to the failed proposal for name registration and several
other issues surrounding this. The omissions mainly relate to fossils, to
non-periodicals, and (less than expected) to Russian and other non-
mainstream sources. Zoo Rec believes it now does better.)
--
Geoff Read <gread at actrix.gen.nz>
-- ANNELIDA
Discuss = annelida at net.bio.net = talk to all members
Server = biosci-server at net.bio.net = un/subscribes
Archives = http://www.bio.net:80/hypermail/ANNELIDA/
Resources = http://biodiversity.uno.edu/~worms/annelid.html
--
