> Why is the family name Flabelligeridae Saint-Joseph 1894 the one in
> current use? Stöp-Bowitz pointed out that Chloraemidae was not to be used
> as Chloreama is a junior synonym of Flabelligera (see also Article 40(b)
> in the Code). But what about Pherusea Grube, 1850 - shouldn't that be name
> to be used (as Pherusidae)???
Would it be relevant that Chloremiens Quatrefages 1849 appears to
predate Pherusea Grube 1850, thus making Chloraema (or its subjective
senior synonym) always the type genus?
--
Geoff Read <g.read at niwa.cri.nz>
-- ANNELIDA LIST
Discuss = <annelida at net.bio.net> = talk to all members
Server = <biosci-server at net.bio.net> = un/subscribes
Archives = http://www.bio.net:80/hypermail/ANNELIDA/
Resources = http://biodiversity.uno.edu/~worms/annelid.html
--
