Hi again!
Well, certainly agree with Jim on type genera not having to be the oldest
ones, but still don't get it why Pherusea of Grube, 1850 is not ok. And I
do think the name Chloreama and Chloreamidae (whatever spelling) is a out
of the way. But I i still don't get it why Grube's Pherusea isn't a valid
family group name, in the same way as we refer e.g., Nephtyidae,
Glyceridae, Syllidea to him (admittedly I don't have Grube 1850 in front of
me, but these names should appear there according to Fauchald & Rouse
1997:135).
Thanks/Fred
Fredrik Pleijel
Tjärnö Marine Biological Laboratory
SE-452 96 Strömstad, Sweden
tel + 46 526 686 38
fax + 46 526 686 07
e.mail fredrik.pleijel at tmbl.gu.se
-- ANNELIDA
Discuss = annelida at net.bio.net = talk to all members
Server = biosci-server at net.bio.net = un/subscribes
Archives = http://www.bio.net:80/hypermail/ANNELIDA/
Resources = http://biodiversity.uno.edu/~worms/annelid.html
--
