Echiura

Kenneth M. Halanych halanych at metazoan.whoi.edu
Tue Nov 2 19:32:39 EST 1999


I have been following the Echiura debate with some interest and I just 
wanted to add some comments. I think that a comparison of the Echiura to 
the pogonophorans makes Kristian's point all the more relevant. Taxonomic 
ranks are purely man made and have no meaning in nature. Meredith 
Jones (and Ivanov to some degree) was the one who was pushing for the 
"phylum" status of both perviate pogonophorans and vestimentiferans 
based on (what I consider) minor body plan differences. Several genes (I 
am drawing both on published and unpublished data) show very little 
diversity with the vestimentifera and limited diversity in the perviates. A 
rankless taxonomic scheme based on monophyletic groups would avoid 
these problems - diversity and differences of opinion on importance of 
certain features...as well as the abundance of names for the same 
monophyletic clade as is the case with pogonophorans. 	 
 In the 1998 paper quoted by Geoff Read (Cah. Biol. Mar. 39:355-358 ), 
we did agree with McHugh's use of the term Siboglinidae (p357).    

Ken Halanych
Biology Dept. MS 33
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Woods Hole, MA 02543
<halanych at metazoan.whoi.edu>


-- ANNELIDA LIST
   Discuss  =  <annelida at net.bio.net> = talk to all members
   Server =  <biosci-server at net.bio.net> = un/subscribes
   Archives  = http://www.bio.net:80/hypermail/ANNELIDA/
   Resources = http://biodiversity.uno.edu/~worms/annelid.html
--


More information about the Annelida mailing list