Neither Filograna nor Filigrana have a species setosa listed in Hartman's
Catalogue 1959 or Supplement 1965 , and Malaquin 1901 is not listed in her
1951 Literature or in Ward & Fauchald 1997 Polychaete Bibliography. If one
of the specialists doesn't have an answer, it sounds like the name has been
incorrectly cited or referred. You might check Zoological Record for years
around then.
Otherwise check Malaquin 1896, C.R. Acad, Sci. Paris 123: 1316-1318. The
paper deals with monstrillid copepods in filigranes. (p. 162 in Hartman 1951).
Good luck and let us know how you make out.
Mary
Tel +45-35 32 10 67 - Fax +45-35 32 10 10
E-mail: mepetersen at zmuc.ku.dk
>ooooooooo))))):>
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Bamber [mailto:rnb at nhm.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 10:06 PM
To: annelida at net.bio.net
Subject: Filograna setosa
I am trying to track down the current name of a polychaete - which I need to
list as the host of a parasitic copepod. The name given was Filograna
setosa, and it was in a paper published by Malaquin in 1901. I think it was
French material - certainly European. Has anyone any idea of the current
name
for this animal - it is not listed as a synonym in Faune de France? (I realize
that Filograna is monotypic for implexa.)
Many thanks
Dr Roger Bamber
Consultancy Leader
Environment: Coastal & Marine
The Natural History Museum
Cromwell Road
London SW7 5BD
United Kingdom
Tel: 0207 942 5636
Fax: 0207 942 5054
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/science/consulting/index.htmlhttp://www.nhm.ac.uk/zoology/stranding/index.html
-- ANNELIDA LIST
Discuss = <annelida at net.bio.net> = talk to all members
Server = <biosci-server at net.bio.net> = un/subscribes
Archives = http://www.bio.net/hypermail/annelida/
Resources = http://www.annelida.net/
--
