> We are trying to upgrade our ACCESS database for the invertebrates
> collection. The query is, for those of you involved in cataloging of this
> sort, do you have a separate category for genus and a separate (non-linked)
> category for species? Or do you put in genus and species together as one
> (linked) category?
>> Presently our program, if you put in a family, will give the list of genera
> within that family, and species within that genus, but somehow it got
> complicated and the computer programmer has asked the above question.
If I understand correctly you are talking about the process whereby one
selects the species one is going to give a new record to, and the prompting or
restrictions that the form offers on the choices?
With total rigour one should not be able to create a new combination at this
point, and certainly not a new genus. Separately there should be a table or
tables defining the species, including a link to the basionym (the original
combination when the species was erected).
But in practice I would probably want freedom to create impromtu species
epithets (but not genera). Which may or may not be a good idea if data entry
for the group (e.g. polychaetes) is being done by a non-group-specialist
Geoff Read <g.read at niwa.co.nz>
-- ANNELIDA LIST
Discuss = <annelida at net.bio.net> = talk to all members
Server = <biosci-server at net.bio.net> = un/subscribes
Archives = http://www.bio.net/hypermail/annelida/
Resources = http://www.annelida.net/