Hi Jeff, in my opinion you are right...., and not only because of the "odd
place" of this record....
I could only suggest to write to the Editor of the Journal....stressing the
poor science of this contribution... in such case, I would consider the
Editor as responsible as the Authors...who revised this piece of work?
surely NO a polychaete specialist of any kind...
All the best and cheers,
Maria Cristina
At 21.53 10/12/2008, Geoff Read wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>>Interesting. There was almost no feedback on that posting. What looks like
>an incomprehensible load of nonsense is published, and the reaction is -
>zilch, blah, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
>>Should we leave awful work uncommented upon? Just ignore it? I don't
>think so. Should I be more kind and non-judgmental? Very likely, but it
>is disappointing to see something like this slip through to muddy the
>waters of the permanent record.
>>Just my opinion. Let me know yours.
>>Geoff
>>_______________________________________________
>Annelida mailing list
>Post: Annelida from net.bio.net>Help/archive: http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/annelida>Resources: http://www.annelida.net
------------------------------
Maria Cristina Gambi
Laboratorio di Ecologia del Benthos
(Stazione Zoologica "Anton Dohrn" di Napoli)
Punta S. Pietro
80077 Ischia (Napoli, Italy)
tel ++39 081 991410 or ++39 081 5833513
fax ++39 081 984201
e-mail:gambimc from szn.it
-------------------------------------------
