[Annelida] Peer review - the human foible effect

[Roman Luštrik]

Thank you Geoff for this gem. I only wish the authors would include editors
as well, as they are also one of the nodes the manuscript must pass on its
path to glory.

It's a pity they didn't mention open-access publishing sensu PLoS
one<http://www.plosone.org/home.action>
.



On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Geoff Read <g.read from niwa.co.nz> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Slightly peripheral topic, but see what strikes a chord with your
> experience.
>
> Peer review highly sensitive to poor refereeing, claim researchers.
> http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/43691
>
> The article pdf
> http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1008/1008.4324v1.pdf
>
> Geoff
>
>
>
>
>
> NIWA is the trading name of the National Institute of Water & Atmospheric
> Research Ltd.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Annelida mailing list
> Post: Annelida from net.bio.net
> Help/archive: http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/annelida
> Resources: http://www.annelida.net
>



-- 
In God we trust, all others bring data.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.bio.net/bionet/mm/annelida/attachments/20100915/4886243c/attachment.html