Those DOIs seem to be faulty apart from the last one on Scripps.
Try starting at the journal issue http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v471/n7336/index.html
Geoff
>>> On 3/03/2011 at 9:55 a.m., "Geoff Read" <g.read from niwa.co.nz> wrote:
> Back to the errants and sedents - apparently.
>> Struck, Torsten H.et al. 2011: Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid
> evolution. Nature 471(7336): 95-98. (Issue of 3 March)
>>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09864>> There is a commentary by Detlev Arendt, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/471044a>> "... Many of the nodes in their tree, especially that separating the
> Errantia from the Sedentaria, had remarkably high support values (contrasting
> with those of previous annelid phylogenies based on single genes4), making it
> highly likely that this grouping is definitive."
>> This is of course would be somewhat of a nightmare return to the past for
> those of us who have to implement a higher classification for practical use.
>> Also this week Nature reports on the likely closure of Scripps Library.
>>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/471018a
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
NIWA is the trading name of the National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd.
