[Annelida] FW: Why are they doing it?

[Daniel Martin]

Hi all,

I was thinking exactly in the same terms as stated by Christos. Such a critical paper is not only a good idea, but a must be written one. 

Greetings,

Dani.
——
 
Dr. Daniel Martin
Scientific Researcher
 
Centre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB - CSIC)
  
  - Carrer d'accès a la Cala Sant Francesc 14
  - 17300 Blanes (Girona), Catalunya (Spain)
  - Tel: (34) 972336101
  - Mobile phone: (34) 636046003
  - Fax: (34) 972337806
  - WWW Institutional: http://www.ceab.csic.es
  - WWW Personal: http://www.ceab.csic.es/personal/daniel-martin-sintes/

> El 3 des 2018, a les 3:31, Elena Kupriyanova <Elena.Kupriyanova from austmus.gov.au> va escriure:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Sorry, I just cannot be quiet about it. I just seriously wonder why invasion ecologists so blatantly ignore any taxonomical research and I wonder where they get information that they publish?
> 
> Here is a recent example
> https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0191859
> 
> They claim that they found common Australian serpulid Spirobranchus taeniatus and that it is a NATIVE SPECIES in Bay of Biscay, Spain. A 5-second search shows to anyone that this species was described from Australia and is known only from temperate Australia (for example http://www.iobis.org/explore/#/taxon/844904).
> They also write exactly this:
> Five species were not native: Crassostrea gigas, Ostrea stentina, Austrominius modestus, Serpula columbiana, and Neodexiospira sp. C. gigas and A. modestus are listed in the global invasive species database (GISD, http://www.issg.org/database).
> Yes, Serpula columbiana is not a native species in the study area, it is known only from the West Coast of the USA, but it is NOT listed in the database above (check you don't belive me)!
> See Fig. 5 - this is what their wonderful identification "using genetic barcoding" looks like  - the sequences are fragments of 18S! And their photos do not even closely resemble tubes of Spirobranchus taeniatus and Serpula columbiana.
> I just cannot believe it.
> 
> 
> 
> Dr. Elena Kupriyanova
> Senior Research Scientist
> Marine Invertebrates
> 
> Associate Editor,
> Records of the Australian Museum
> 
> Australian Museum Research Institute
> 1 William Street Sydney NSW 2010 Australia
> t 61 2 9320 6340 m 61402735679 f 61 2 9320 6059
> Visit: http://www.australianmuseum.net.au<http://www.australianmuseum.net.au/>
> Like: http://www.facebook.com/australianmuseum
> Follow: http://www.twitter.com/austmus
> Watch: http://www.youtube.com/austmus
> Inspiring the exploration of nature and cultures
> 
> [AM_Logo_Master_RGB_10cm copy.GIF]<http://australianmuseum.net.au/>
> 
> [Image removed by sender.]<https://australianmuseum.net.au/landing/whales/>
> Click here to read the Australian Museum email disclaimer.
> The Australian Museum email disclaimer<https://australianmuseum.net.au/images/footer/disclaimer.htm>
> 
> [https://australianmuseum.net.au/images/footer/am_email_signature.jpg] <https://australianmuseum.net.au/landing/whales/>
> 
> Click here to read the Australian Museum email disclaimer.
> 
> The Australian Museum email disclaimer<https://australianmuseum.net.au/images/footer/disclaimer.htm>
> <~WRD000.jpg>_______________________________________________
> Annelida mailing list
> Post: Annelida from net.bio.net
> Help/archive: http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/annelida
> Resources: http://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/