Surgically inflicted tinnitus
acampane at postbox.acs.ohio-state.edu
Mon Jun 19 22:19:52 EST 1995
In article <3s445n$e1j at lastactionhero.rs.itd.umich.edu> mstaben at umich.edu (Matthew S. Staben) writes:
>From: mstaben at umich.edu (Matthew S. Staben)
>Subject: Re: Surgically inflicted tinnitus
>Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 15:12:59 GMT
>twday at netcom.com (Tom Day) wrote:
>>Last year I had nasal reconstructive surgery.
>>A few weeks after the surgery, a vein deep
>>in my sinus cavity burst and an inflatable catheter was inserted
>>deep into my right nostril to stop the bleeding. Within a few hours
>>I returned to the emergency room because I felt tremendous pressure
>>building up in my right ear. My surgeon discounted the pressure and
>>pain and the catheter was left in place. By the next morning, my
>>ear was loudly ringing and was nearly deaf. The catheter was slightly
>>deflated at that point and the pressure relaxed over the next few
>>days. A week later it was removed and I complained of the tinnitus
>>and loss of hearing. I was tested and discovered to have experienced
>>severe hearing loss in the right ear.
>I'd sue the bastards for all they're worth. It appears you did the
>right thing by showing up and complaining; and the surgeon did the
>wrong thing by discounting pain and pressure. Malpractice is what I
To engage in a law suit, go to your yellow pages. The "Ambulence chaser"
type of lawyer advertises there. Look for expertise in "wrongful injury".
(My son was his by a car years ago, breaking both legs, almost lost a foot,
and dislocated bith shoulders.. The driver had no insurance. We found such
an attorney that pndered this for a few weeks, tehn discovered that my very
own insurance had a coverage clause stating that my children on foot were
also covered. We were able to "stack 3 such policies... etc.)
He worked on a "contingency" basis, collecting 30% on settlement.
I should add that we did not go to court, but agreed to an "arbitrated"
settlement (by, as it were, 3 judges). We were satisfied..
>>I am a musician. Under no circumstances, would I have submitted to
>>an operation that could destroy my hearing.
>All the more reason to sue. The fact that the whole procedure was
>unsuccessful (it should have been) shows the ineptness of the surgeon
>and the attractiveness of the lawsuit.
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Sound Technology /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
More information about the Audiolog