Fw: Mechanisms of hearing question

RonBlue rcb5 at msn.com
Wed Dec 16 09:38:50 EST 1998


-----Original Message-----
From: F. Frank LeFever <flefever at ix.netcom.com>
To: neur-sci at net.bio.net <neur-sci at net.bio.net>
Date: Sunday, December 13, 1998 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: Mechanisms of hearing question


>
>I'll admit to some ignorance about the fine details of auditory sense
>mechanisms, but why do you invoke higher centers in this "tuning"?
>Lateral inhibition in the retina works at the retinal level, I believe.
>Of course, the retina is ALREADY in the CNS (at the level of the
>ganglion cells), so maybe this is not the best comparison, but is it
>not possible that lateral inhibition and fine-tuning is at the level of
>lateral inhibition between hair cells?  Someone out there with a better
>grasp of cochlear funcction out there?  HELP!
>
>F. Frank LeFever, Ph.D.
>New York Neuropsychology Group
>
>
>In <19981213062632.06806.00002674 at ngol06.aol.com> tonyjeffs at aol.com
>(TONYJEFFS) writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>My understanding is that the 'dead' cochlea has a frequency resolution
>of
>>around 1/2 an octave, and in vivo it is the 'lateral inhibition'
>provided by
>>the motile outer hair cells (OHCs) that refines this frequency
>resolution.
>>
>>Now consider the following:
>>IHCs initially detect a sound pressure wave and send the information
>to the
>>brain. The brain processes this data, and send instructions back to
>the
>>appropriate OHCs.  The OHCs do their 'fine tuning' work, enabling the
>>appropriate IHCs to accurately identify the frequency of the incoming
>sound.
>>
>>If that is approximately correct, I see a  problem:-:
>>There would be a delay of the order of milliseconds while (1) the
>initial
>>information is relayed to appropriate brain nuclei, (2) The
>information is
>>processed, (3) instructions are sent to the OHCs.
>>
>>Several milliseconds delay seems rather a long time, particularly as I
>think
>>(?) we can hear sounds of a shorter duration than this.
>>
>>Is my description along the right lines? I suspect I'm missing
>something!
>>Could  there really such a delay?
>>
>>Thanks
>>Tony
>>
>
>
>







More information about the Audiolog mailing list